Perhaps an unreasonable feature; CRT simulation

[spiralknightking]

I saw that Blurbusters have developed a CRT simulation feature that works incredibly well even on 120Hz screens to simulate 60 Hz. It works better the higher one goes. But for scrolling and using a browser, I actually much prefer the blur reduction this produces and it works great on both LCD and OLED alike.

https://blurbusters.com/crt-simulation-in-a-gpu-shader-looks-better-than-bfi/

The question is really; can this be added? Is it too unreasonable?

The blurbusters tests of this feature with the scrolling image at 120Hz on my LG C1 display works flawlessly on zen and other browsers at least.

Blurbusters states on their page that someone who wants to use it simply has to "add it to their engine". I'm no expert on this so I'm assuming it's not that easy. Regardless this would be fun to see in a browser and I don't think any of the other ones would even think of adding such. For browser games to doom-scrolling, I think it would be a fantastic feature for Zen especially as today many users run high refresh rate displays and blur reduction for scrolling is something less thought about, while in terms of improving reading comfort and usability in a browser it's severely underrated.

Their pro's list is quite rich;

1. Major motion blur reduction on 240Hz+ displays.
2. Soft phosphor fade & rolling scan, less eyestrain at same Hz than BFI or strobe mode.
3. Variable per-pixel MPRT (Timothy Lotte’s brightness redistribution algorithm).
4. Great for reducing display motion blur of 60 years of legacy 60fps 60Hz content.
5. Works on LCDs and OLEDs
6. Realtime (for retro & emulator uses) and slo-mo modes (educational)
7. Brightness adjustment (less motion blur at lower gain values, by trading off brightness)
8. Seamless; no banding* (when ABL algorithm in display isn’t interfering)

I've used OLEDs and grew up on CRT's, and this simulation is quite pleasing to the eyes so I thought I would at least share the news about it.