diff --git a/.DS_Store b/.DS_Store new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b35084ca Binary files /dev/null and b/.DS_Store differ diff --git a/examples/.DS_Store b/examples/.DS_Store new file mode 100644 index 00000000..42a25f91 Binary files /dev/null and b/examples/.DS_Store differ diff --git a/examples/auto_model_selection_example/.DS_Store b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/.DS_Store new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6664a68a Binary files /dev/null and b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/.DS_Store differ diff --git a/examples/auto_model_selection_example/Hyperparameter_Configuration.csv b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/Hyperparameter_Configuration.csv new file mode 100644 index 00000000..62d6bf3f --- /dev/null +++ b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/Hyperparameter_Configuration.csv @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +Pipeline Design Dimensions,MO-GAAL,AutoEncoder,SO-GAAL,VAE,AnoGAN,Deep SVDD,ALAD +Data Augmentation,"SMOTE, GAN-based Oversampling",N/A,"Oversampling, GAN-based Augmentation",N/A,N/A,N/A,N/A +Data Preprocessing,"Normalization, Standardization","StandardScaler, Normalization","MinMax Scaling, Standardization","StandardScaler, MinMax Scaling","StandardScaler, MinMax Scaling","StandardScaler, MinMax Scaling","StandardScaler, MinMax Scaling" +Network Architecture,"Discriminator, Generator (GAN), MLP, AutoEncoder","AutoEncoder, MLP","Discriminator, Generator (GAN)","VAE, beta-VAE, AutoEncoder","Discriminator, Generator (GAN)","AutoEncoder, One-Class Classifier","Discriminator, Generator (GAN)" +Hidden Layers,"[[32, 16], [64, 32, 16], [128, 64, 32, 16]]","[[32, 16], [64, 32, 16], [128, 64, 32, 16]]","[[64, 32], [128, 64, 32], [256, 128, 64, 32]]","[[64, 32], [128, 64, 32], [256, 128, 64]]","[[64, 32], [128, 64, 32], [256, 128, 64, 32]]","[[64, 32], [128, 64, 32], [256, 128, 64, 32]]","[[64, 32], [128, 64, 32], [256, 128, 64]]" +Activation,"ReLU, LeakyReLU, Tanh","ReLU, Tanh, LeakyReLU","ReLU, LeakyReLU, Tanh","ReLU, Tanh, LeakyReLU","ReLU, LeakyReLU, Tanh","ReLU, Tanh, LeakyReLU","ReLU, LeakyReLU, Tanh" +Dropout,"0.0, 0.25, 0.5","0.0, 0.2, 0.5","0.0, 0.25, 0.5","0.0, 0.3, 0.5","0.0, 0.25, 0.5","0.0, 0.2, 0.5","0.0, 0.25, 0.5" +Initialization,"Xavier, He, Random Normal","Xavier, He, Random Normal","Xavier, He, Random Normal","Xavier, He, Random Normal","Xavier, He, Random Normal","Xavier, He, Random Normal","Xavier, He, Random Normal" +Loss Function,"BCE, WGAN Loss, Hinge Loss","Mean Squared Error, Binary Crossentropy","BCE, WGAN Loss","Reconstruction Loss, KL Divergence","Binary Crossentropy, Anomaly Score Loss","SVDD Loss, Reconstruction Loss (AE)","Binary Crossentropy, Adversarial Loss" +Optimizer,"SGD, Adam, RMSprop","SGD, Adam, RMSprop","Adam, RMSprop, SGD","Adam, RMSprop, SGD","Adam, RMSprop, SGD","Adam, RMSprop, SGD","Adam, RMSprop, SGD" +Epochs,"50, 100, 200","50, 100, 200","50, 100, 150","50, 100, 200","50, 100, 150","50, 100, 200","50, 100, 150" +Batch Size,"32, 64, 128","32, 64, 128","32, 64, 128","32, 64, 128","32, 64, 128","32, 64, 128","32, 64, 128" +Learning Rate,"1e-3, 1e-4, 1e-5","1e-3, 1e-4, 1e-5","1e-3, 1e-4, 1e-5","1e-3, 1e-4, 1e-5","1e-3, 1e-4, 1e-5","1e-3, 1e-4, 1e-5","1e-3, 1e-4, 1e-5" +Weight Decay,"1e-2, 1e-4","1e-2, 1e-4","1e-2, 1e-4","1e-2, 1e-4","1e-2, 1e-4","1e-2, 1e-4","1e-2, 1e-4" diff --git a/examples/auto_model_selection_example/auto_selection.ipynb b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/auto_selection.ipynb new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c2d3db02 --- /dev/null +++ b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/auto_selection.ipynb @@ -0,0 +1,7306 @@ +{ + "cells": [ + { + "cell_type": "markdown", + "metadata": {}, + "source": [ + "### Example" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 1, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "data": { + "text/plain": [ + "False" + ] + }, + "execution_count": 1, + "metadata": {}, + "output_type": "execute_result" + } + ], + "source": [ + "from pyod.utils.auto_model_selector import AutoModelSelector\n", + "from pyod.utils.data import generate_data\n", + "import os\n", + "from dotenv import load_dotenv\n", + "load_dotenv()" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 4, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "name": "stdout", + "output_type": "stream", + "text": [ + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"imbalanced data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and explicitly handles imbalanced data, which is a significant characteristic of the dataset. Its capability for short training times and scalability aligns well with the medium data size requirement. Although it may have high memory usage as a weakness, it excels in handling sparse data and does not suffer from low memory issues, making it the most fitting choice among the options provided.\n" + ] + } + ], + "source": [ + "api_key = os.getenv(\"API_KEY\")\n", + "\n", + "contamination = 0.1 # percentage of outliers\n", + "n_train = 200 # number of training points\n", + "n_test = 100 # number of testing points\n", + "\n", + "# Generate sample data\n", + "X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = \\\n", + " generate_data(n_train=n_train,\n", + " n_test=n_test,\n", + " n_features=5,\n", + " contamination=contamination,\n", + " random_state=42)\n", + "selector = AutoModelSelector(dataset= X_train, api_key=api_key)\n", + "\n", + "#get the selected model and reason for selecting it\n", + "selected_model, reason = selector.model_auto_select()\n", + "\n", + "#initialize the top model\n", + "clf = selector.get_top_clf()\n", + "\n", + "clf.fit(X_train) #train model\n", + "y_train_scores = clf.decision_scores_ # Outlier scores for training data\n", + "y_test_scores = clf.decision_function(X_test) # Outlier scores for test data" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "markdown", + "metadata": {}, + "source": [ + "### Comparison （with addition notes）" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": null, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "from scipy.io import loadmat\n", + "import os\n", + "\n", + "def get_datasets(data_dir='data'):\n", + " dataset_list = []\n", + "\n", + " if not os.path.exists(data_dir):\n", + " print(f\"The folder '{data_dir}' does not exist.\")\n", + " return dataset_list\n", + "\n", + " # return all .mat files in the folder\n", + " return [os.path.join(data_dir, f) for f in os.listdir(data_dir) if f.endswith('.mat')]\n" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 14, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "datasets_with_additional_notes = {\n", + " 'data/pima.mat': 'Healthcare dataset containing tabular data of clinical measurements for diabetes patients.',\n", + " 'data/cardio.mat': 'Healthcare dataset comprising tabular data of clinical measurements for heart disease patients.',\n", + " 'data/mnist.mat': 'Image dataset consisting of grayscale images of handwritten digits.',\n", + " 'data/arrhythmia.mat': 'Healthcare dataset with tabular data of clinical measurements for arrhythmia patients.',\n", + " 'data/pendigits.mat': 'Time series dataset featuring pen-based input sequences of handwritten digits.',\n", + " 'data/shuttle.mat': 'Sensor dataset recording tabular data of spacecraft state information.',\n", + " 'data/letter.mat': 'Image dataset containing images of handwritten letters.',\n", + " 'data/musk.mat': 'Chemical dataset providing tabular data of molecular features.',\n", + " 'data/vowels.mat': 'Time series dataset with phonetic features of vowel sounds.',\n", + " 'data/optdigits.mat': 'Image dataset for optical character recognition of handwritten digits.',\n", + " 'data/satellite.mat': 'Remote sensing dataset with pixel features from satellite images.',\n", + " 'data/lympho.mat': 'Healthcare dataset involving tabular data of clinical measurements for lymphatic diseases.',\n", + " 'data/ionosphere.mat': 'Radar dataset containing tabular data of radar echo signals from the ionosphere.',\n", + " 'data/wbc.mat': 'Healthcare dataset with tabular data of nuclear features of breast cancer cells.',\n", + " 'data/glass.mat': 'Material dataset containing tabular data of chemical compositions of glass types.',\n", + " 'data/satimage-2.mat': 'Remote sensing dataset with pixel features from satellite images.',\n", + " 'data/vertebral.mat': 'Healthcare dataset involving tabular data of clinical measurements for vertebral diseases.'\n", + "}\n", + "\n" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 15, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "def select_model_datasets(output_file='with_note_selection_results/output.json', repeat=1, api_key=OPENAI_API_KEY):\n", + " \"\"\"\n", + " Runs auto-selection for all datasets and store the results into a json file\n", + "\n", + " Parameters:\n", + " - output_file: output file location\n", + " - repeat: number of times to run for each dataset\n", + " - api_key: API key for the LLM\n", + " \n", + " Prints each selected model and reason and store them\n", + " \"\"\"\n", + " #dataset_paths = get_datasets()\n", + " datasets = {}\n", + " \n", + " for dataset_path, description in datasets_with_additional_notes.items():\n", + " mat = loadmat(dataset_path)\n", + " selector = AutoModelSelector(dataset=mat['X'], api_key=api_key, additional_notes = description)\n", + " result_list = []\n", + "\n", + " dataset_name = os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(dataset_path))[0]\n", + " print(f\"Current dataset: {dataset_name}\")\n", + " print('\\n')\n", + " \n", + " for i in range(repeat):\n", + " print(f\"Repeat: {i+1}\")\n", + " selected_model, reason = selector.model_auto_select()\n", + " if selected_model != None and reason != None:\n", + " result_list.append({\"selected_model\": selected_model, \"reason\": reason})\n", + "\n", + " datasets[dataset_name] = result_list\n", + " print('\\n\\n')\n", + "\n", + " # Write to JSON file\n", + " with open(output_file, \"w\") as json_file:\n", + " json.dump(datasets, json_file, indent=4)\n", + "\n", + " return\n" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 19, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "name": "stdout", + "output_type": "stream", + "text": [ + "Current dataset: pima\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"medical\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"noisy data\", \"imbalanced data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\", \"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, excels in handling imbalanced data, and performs well in the medical domain. It is also designed for high-dimensional datasets and short training time, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of noisy and medium data size. Although it requires high memory, its other strengths outweigh this weakness given the CPU and low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular and medical data, which matches our domain requirements. Furthermore, it is well-suited for imbalanced data, despite the dataset being noisy, which aligns with our characteristics. Even though AE1SVM usually requires high memory and is strong in GPU processing, its strengths outweigh its weaknesses in terms of imbalanced and tabular data processing. Given that CPU and low memory requirements are crucial, this might not be ideal, but no model perfectly matches all criteria. However, AE1SVM falls within the constraints better than other models due to its applicability to imbalanced tabular datasets in the medical domain.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it effectively handles tabular data and is strong in medical domains. It can handle imbalanced data, which is a characteristic of the given dataset. Although it has weaknesses such as issues with noisy data and high memory requirements, it is still the best fit given the constraints of CPU and low memory. Its ability to work with imbalanced data and strong performance with tabular data, especially in medical contexts, makes it the most suitable model among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is suitable for medium-sized tabular medical datasets with noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. While AutoEncoder has a weakness with imbalanced data, its strength in handling noisy data and healthcare applications makes it a better fit than other models in the list. Additionally, it supports GPU acceleration, which can mitigate the CPU and low memory constraints. The model's capability to process high-dimensional data efficiently while maintaining short training time also aligns well with the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data, which is the data type in the dataset. It can effectively handle imbalanced data, which is crucial given the dataset's characteristics. This model is also applicable to medical domains. Although it usually requires high memory and can work with GPUs, its ability to handle high dimensionality and its short training time make it suitable for medium-sized datasets. While noisy data is a weakness for AE1SVM, the need for low memory usage is accommodated as 'low memory' is a requirement, making it a balanced choice given the alternatives.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it supports tabular medical data and performs well with imbalanced datasets, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, AE1SVM is less dependent on GPU and high memory, aligning with the constraints of using a CPU and low memory. While it has some weaknesses with noisy data, its strengths in handling imbalanced, sparse, and high-dimensional data outweigh this for this specific use case.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is the most suitable model as it is strong in handling tabular data and medical domains, which align with the dataset properties. It can effectively manage high dimensionality and noisy data, both of which are characteristics of the given dataset. Additionally, it is well-suited for imbalanced data, making it a good fit for the dataset's unique challenges. Although it prefers GPU usage, its scalability to large datasets is advantageous, despite it having high memory use like other high-performance models. Furthermore, ALAD aligns with the budget constraint since it handles CPU although it prefers GPU, which fits within the dataset's requirement for low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset's characteristics of being medium-sized, tabular, in the medical domain, noisy, imbalanced, and low memory requirement. It excels in handling tabular and medical data, accommodates imbalanced datasets, and copes well with sparse data which is beneficial for potential noise. Although its performance on noisy data and CPU compatibility are noted weaknesses, the other models have greater issues with the dataset requirements, especially concerning medium data size, low memory, and CPU. AE1SVM strikes a balance in fitting the dataset's demands, including short training times and scalability to larger datasets when needed.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for tabular data in the medical domain, as it is robust to imbalanced data and can handle noisy data effectively. Despite its preference for high memory and GPU, it demonstrates good scalability to medium-sized datasets. While it is not specifically optimized for CPUs or low-memory environments, its strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data issues make it the most viable option from the list given the requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset involves tabular and medical data, which aligns with AutoEncoder's strengths in handling healthcare and high-dimensional tabular data. It can manage noisy data and perform well on medium-sized datasets. Additionally, it does not have significant weaknesses in terms of low memory or CPU usage. Despite its weakness with imbalanced data, it aligns better with the requirements than the other models, which have more significant conflicts with the dataset's constraints and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it has strengths in handling tabular and imbalanced data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also aligns with the medical domain requirement and works well with high-dimensional data. Despite its weaknesses in handling noisy data, it is among the options that fit best given the constraint of CPU and low memory because of its short training time. Other models either lack strength in handling tabular data or imbalanced data, or are not suitable for low-memory CPU environments.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is chosen because it aligns well with the dataset tags, especially in handling tabular data and noisy data, which are crucial for the medical domain. Although it operates on GPU with high memory requirements and may have long training times, it is well-suited for dealing with high dimensionality and sparse datasets, which are typical in medical datasets. Its ability to handle imbalanced data and large datasets also make it more fitting for the given dataset characteristics than other models, even with a CPU constraint.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it handles tabular data effectively, which is crucial for the dataset type, and it is well-suited for CPU processing with low memory requirements. Despite its weakness with noisy data, it excels with imbalanced data and has short training times. This makes it a balanced choice given the dataset properties and computational constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the best choice because it handles tabular data effectively and is suitable for medical domains, which aligns with our dataset tags. It is robust to imbalanced data and performs well with sparse data, crucial for handling the data characteristics. Despite its weakness in dealing with noisy data and requirement for high memory, it compensates with its ability to handle high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets. The mention of CPU constraints amongst its weaknesses is less concerning as it can utilize GPU resources, and given the medium data size, its strengths outweigh its weaknesses in our scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and handles imbalanced datasets well, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which are beneficial given the medium-sized dataset and low memory constraint. Although it is somewhat computationally intensive and sensitive to hyperparameters, it compensates with its strengths in handling imbalanced data. Despite the noise in the data, LUNAR’s ability to quickly iterate and scale efficiently makes it the most suitable choice among the given models.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it handles tabular and medical data effectively, which aligns with the dataset domain. It also performs well on imbalanced data which is a characteristic of the dataset. Even though noisy data is a weakness, AE1SVM's strengths in high dimensionality and scalable datasets help mitigate this. Despite its high memory usage, the short training time and applicability to imbalanced data make it preferable, especially with a medium-sized dataset, assuming manageable memory constraints can be accommodated.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It can handle imbalanced data, a crucial characteristic of the dataset, and supports medical applications. While it requires high memory and GPU, which contradicts the low memory requirement, it is one of the few models capable of handling tabular, imbalanced, and medical datasets among the given options. Its ability to manage high dimensionality and scalable large datasets further complements the medium data size. Despite potential challenges with noisy data, it balances other factors more effectively than the alternatives.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for medium-sized, tabular data with noise, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite having a weakness with imbalanced data, it is efficient on CPU, which is crucial for low-memory environments, and it has strengths in handling noisy, high-dimensional data, making it a reasonable choice for this medical dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is well-suited for tabular data and can handle medical data, making it applicable to the domain. Its strengths include handling imbalanced data and compatibility with tabular data, which align well with the dataset's characteristics. Although AE1SVM struggles with noisy data, it has robust capabilities for imbalanced datasets, which is more critical given the dataset requirements. Despite its need for high memory and GPU, its short training time is advantageous when considering CPU limitations and low memory, making it a favorable option relative to others like MO-GAAL or ALAD that also have high memory needs or longer training times.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it handles tabular data, medical domain, and imbalanced data effectively, which are all key characteristics of our dataset. Additionally, AE1SVM's strength in dealing with high dimensionality and its short training time aligns well with the dataset's characteristics such as noisy data. While AE1SVM has weaknesses with low memory and CPU requirements, the other models have more significant downside impacts for this particular use case. Choosing AE1SVM properly balances the need for managing imbalanced and noisy tabular medical data within a CPU and low-memory environment.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it effectively handles tabular and medical data, which aligns with the dataset type and domain. It also manages imbalanced and high-dimensional data, which are characteristics of the dataset. While AE1SVM has weaknesses regarding noisy data and low memory, its strengths in handling imbalanced data with short training times using GPU make it more suitable for the given CPU and low-memory constraints compared to other models. Additionally, the model's strength in scalable datasets aligns with the medium data size requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model as it handles tabular and imbalanced data well. It is good for medium-sized datasets and has short training times, which aligns with the low memory and CPU requirements. Despite its issues with noisy data, the strengths in handling tabular data and imbalanced datasets make it more applicable compared to other models, none of which meet all dataset requirements without significant trade-offs.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE (Variational AutoEncoder) is the most suitable model for this situation due to its strengths in processing tabular data and noisy data, which align with the dataset characteristics. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced data, it still supports the majority of the dataset requirements. It can handle the medium-sized data on a CPU, and its short training time is beneficial given the low memory environment. The other models either do not support tabular data or have more conflicting weaknesses with the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is a suitable model for the given dataset properties. It specializes in handling imbalanced and high-dimensional tabular data, which is crucial for medical datasets. Despite its longer training time and some weaknesses with CPU and low memory, its strengths in handling medical, tabular, and imbalanced data align well with the dataset tags. The weakness concerning noisy data is noted, but its ability to process imbalanced, tabular data efficiently using a single-class SVM approach makes it the most fitting choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and constraints. It supports tabular data, which aligns well with the data type. Additionally, it effectively handles noisy and imbalanced data, which are characteristics of the dataset. Despite its high memory requirements, ALAD's ability to utilize tabular data and its adaptability to medical domains makes it an appropriate choice, given the medium data size and the constraints surrounding CPU and low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular and medical domains, which align with the dataset properties. It effectively handles imbalanced data and supports tabular data, which are crucial given the dataset's characteristics. Although it requires high memory and has some weaknesses with noisy data, it offers strong capabilities for scalable datasets, high-dimensionality handling, and short training times, which is beneficial under CPU constraints. Its strengths align closely with the dataset's needs despite minimal weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is highly suitable as it effectively handles tabular data, which is the type of dataset in question. It also manages imbalanced and medical data well. Although it has strengths in high memory and GPU contexts, its capability with imbalanced datasets and tabular data for a medium-sized dataset outweigh its weaknesses in low memory and CPU only situations. Given the noisy data characteristic of the dataset, AE1SVM's weaknesses include handling such scenarios, but it remains the least problematic compared to other models listed, notably AnoGAN and MO-GAAL, which are less compatible with tabular data and imbalanced datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is chosen because it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics, particularly for handling tabular and imbalanced data. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, its strengths in imbalanced data, short training time, and compatibility with GPU usage signify that it can efficiently process the medium-sized tabular medical dataset. It also requires less memory compared to models like AE1SVM and MO-GAAL, fitting the CPU and low-memory requirements. Overall, SO-GAAL provides a balanced trade-off for the specified requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized with tabular data from the medical domain and has characteristics of noisy and imbalanced data. The key requirements include low memory usage and CPU compatibility. While VAE has some weaknesses on imbalanced data and CPU usage, it effectively handles tabular data, biomedical (healthcare) applications, and noisy data which is a prominent feature of the given dataset. VAE's ability to handle healthcare, noisy data, and tabular data makes it a favorable choice, despite the weaknesses regarding CPU usage and the imbalanced data characteristic.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data and can handle noisy data, which are relevant to the dataset characteristics. Although ALAD typically requires a GPU, the dataset's medium size and the fact that it effectively manages imbalanced data further support its suitability for this medical dataset. Additionally, even though ALAD is not naturally suited to a CPU or low memory environments, its overarching compatibility with the dataset's requirements outweighs these limitations given the constraints of the other available models.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is selected due to its strength in handling tabular data, which is the data type present, and its ability to manage noisy data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It also supports high dimensionality, which is beneficial for potential complex medical datasets. Although it requires high memory, the short training time and scalability to large datasets make it advantageous for the given medium-sized dataset. It's more aligned with the medical domain and imbalanced data compared to other models, except MO-GAAL, which has a weakness in handling noisy data and low memory requirement, an important constraint for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is the most suitable choice for the given dataset characteristics. It is strong in handling tabular data and medical domain applications, which aligns with the dataset properties. It can manage noisy data and has scalability for larger datasets, which matches the medium-size data tag. Although it has a weakness in long training time, it does scale well and can handle the noisy and imbalanced nature of the data while using GPU, which is advantageous given the CPU and low memory requirements highlighted as additional constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it aligns well with the dataset properties: it supports tabular data, handles imbalanced data effectively, and is capable of running on a CPU under low memory conditions. Moreover, it boasts short training times and scalability to medium-sized datasets, fitting well within the additional requirements specified. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data, this is less of a concern than the weaknesses of other models which either require high memory or are unsuitable for tabular and imbalanced data.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data, handles noisy data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. It's well-suited for the medical domain and applicable to medium-sized, imbalanced datasets, which are requirements of the dataset. Although ALAD has limitations on CPU and low memory, it balances by being scalable to large datasets and is aligned with the requirement for tabular data in a medical context. Despite some CPU weaknesses, the ability to handle noisy and imbalanced data combined with its strength in medical applications makes it the most fitting choice from the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is best suited for this dataset as it handles tabular and high-dimensional data effectively, which aligns with the given data type. Its strengths include dealing with imbalanced data, which is crucial for this medical dataset. Despite its weaknesses in handling noisy data, it offers short training time and scales well to large datasets, meeting the requirements of using a CPU and working with low memory. Although it struggles with noisy data, its strengths align most closely with the other key requirements of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is selected because it handles tabular data and noisy data effectively, aligning well with the dataset properties. Despite its weakness in CPU performance, ALAD's capabilities with tabular and medical data, along with scalability to large datasets, make it a suitable choice for a medium-sized dataset. ALAD's strength in handling imbalanced data is another reason for its selection, matching one of the key dataset characteristics. While its weakness includes long training times and CPU performance, these drawbacks are outweighed by its alignment with the dataset requirements for medical, tabular, and noisy data.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice because it effectively handles tabular medical data while dealing with imbalanced datasets, a key characteristic of this dataset. Although it is weak against noisy data, this limitation is shared by multiple models, and AE1SVM offers strong support for high dimensionality. The model's efficient training time and capacity to scale to large datasets align well with the 'medium' data size requirement. Despite being CPU-bound, AE1SVM's capabilities on tabular data and imbalance handling outweigh the disadvantage, making it the best fit among the list provided without requiring high GPU resources.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the best choice for the given dataset properties and constraints. It supports tabular data and is capable of handling imbalanced data, which are key characteristics of the data. Additionally, its strength in dealing with high dimensionality aligns with the complexity often found in medical datasets. Despite the dataset's noisy nature, the model's strength in dealing with imbalanced data and having a short training time makes it still favorable over others. While it has weaknesses with CPU and low memory, the lack of better alternatives for the specific challenges of the dataset (like imbalanced data, CPU, and low memory constraints) makes AE1SVM a more suitable choice compared to others, which either don't handle tabular data well or struggle with imbalanced data.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable choice considering the dataset properties and model characteristics. It is capable of handling imbalanced data, which is a critical characteristic of the dataset. Although it's not particularly strong in handling noisy data, it is superior to other models in managing the imbalanced data aspect, which is more pronounced in this context. Given that noisy data is less significant than the imbalanced property here, SO-GAAL outweighs other models like AutoEncoder or AE1SVM, which either struggle with imbalanced data or cannot be efficiently run on CPU resources. Furthermore, SO-GAAL offers short training times matching the 'low memory' and 'CPU' resource constraints specified.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset as it handles tabular data and imbalanced data well. It is also strong in handling medical data. While it has a weakness with noisy data, it provides high scalability to large datasets which accommodates the medium-sized dataset. Despite its GPU and high memory preferences, AE1SVM's strengths in imbalanced and tabular data make it a better match compared to others. DevNet, although suitable for noisy data, is not ideal for tabular data. The combination of strengths in AE1SVM aligns more closely with the dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset properties of medium-sized, tabular, medical data with noise and imbalance. It excels with tabular and medical data, handles imbalanced data well, and leverages the strength of GPU for short training times. Although it requires high memory, which could be a concern, it generally accommodates large datasets efficiently. While it has weaknesses with small data sizes and noise, its ability to manage imbalanced datasets and suitability for tabular data make it the best compromise given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it supports tabular data, accommodates imbalanced data well, and is strong in the medical domain, which aligns with the dataset tags. Although it requires high memory, it handles medium-sized datasets efficiently and has a short training time, which compensates for the memory requirement. Despite its weakness with noisy data, its advantages in handling imbalanced and medical data make it the most suitable choice from the given list.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected based on its strengths in handling tabular data and imbalanced data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Given the constraints of using CPU and low memory, LUNAR offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Although it has weaknesses in handling noisy data, the other models have more critical weaknesses concerning the dataset properties or computational resources. LUNAR's strengths and adaptability make it the most suitable model for the given requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it handles tabular data effectively and is suitable for medical domains. It has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is crucial for this dataset characteristic. Although it requires high memory, it is compatible with CPU requirements. Its support for short training times and scalability to large datasets also aligns well with the dataset size. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, considering other models' limitations, it stands as the best compromise for this dataset's characteristics and additional requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset as it can handle tabular data, has strengths in the healthcare domain, and deals effectively with noisy data and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. While it has a weakness with imbalanced data, it accommodates noisy data and is scalable to large datasets with short training time, making it suitable for medium data sizes. Despite preferences for GPU usage, its ability to work with healthcare data and handle noise makes it a better fit compared to others for the specified requirements, albeit the low memory constraint.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, medical, noisy, and imbalanced, with constraints on CPU usage and low memory. LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Although it is weaker on noisy data, it offers low memory usage and CPU efficiency, and it has short training time which makes it suitable given the additional requirements. Despite its weaker handling of noise, its strengths in handling tabular and imbalanced data make it a slightly more suitable choice compared to other models, given the dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular medical datasets with noisy data, even though it has weaknesses with imbalanced data and is not optimal for CPU usage. Its strengths in handling tabular data, noisy data, and healthcare applications make it a strong candidate for the dataset context. Despite its CPU weakness, given the overall requirements, VAE provides a balanced option for analyzing medical data with limited memory.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data and medical domains, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It can address noisy data, which is important for the medical domain represented here. Despite its weakness in low memory and using CPU, it can manage imbalanced data efficiently, which is crucial given the dataset's features. Additionally, it can scale well to larger datasets that suit the medium-sized dataset requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is chosen because it supports tabular data and is well-suited for handling noisy and sparse data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. While it requires high memory, it excels in handling imbalanced data, a notable characteristic of the dataset. Although ALAD's high memory requirement conflicts with low memory needs, its effectiveness in other areas, such as scalability and handling medical domain challenges, makes it the most suitable choice among the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it supports tabular data and is well-suited to handle imbalanced data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It also fits within the 'medical' domain and is capable of leveraging GPU for training. While it has a weakness for noisy data and is not optimized for low memory environments, its strengths in tabular and imbalanced data make it the most suitable among the given models, as others fail to fully align with these crucial dataset characteristics.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: cardio\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"medical\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"high dimensionality\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\", \"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset since it caters well to tabular data with high dimensionality and is suited for medical applications. Although it typically works better with high memory and GPU resources, its ability to efficiently handle sparse data and scalability to large datasets makes it a strong candidate. Even though CPU and low memory are requirements, the dataset's characteristics of medium size and high dimensionality align well with AE1SVM's strengths, providing a balance between feasible implementation and performance.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the given dataset because it handles tabular data and high dimensionality effectively, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is also strong in the healthcare domain, which is relevant given the medical context. Additionally, it has the capability to manage noisy data and can be scalable to large datasets, which makes it efficient even with medium data sizes. Despite its weaknesses in CPU and low memory environments, it still offers short training times and optimal performance on suitable hardware setups like GPUs. Overall, AutoEncoder is the best option that matches the requirements and strengths needed for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties of medium-sized, high-dimensional, tabular medical data, with a requirement for low memory usage on a CPU. AE1SVM's strengths include handling high dimensionality, tabular data, and medical domains, making it fit well with the dataset's characteristics. While it typically requires a GPU for high memory and scaling, it meets the needs for tabular and high-dimensional data, thus aligning best with the provided requirements, despite its CPU and low memory weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given requirements. It supports high dimensionality, tabular data, and has strengths in the medical domain. While it does require high memory, it is scalable to large datasets and provides short training times, which can be advantageous for a medium-sized dataset. The dataset's requirement for low memory is a concern but given the constraints and available options, AE1SVM aligns well with other key dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data within the medical domain and efficiently manages high dimensionality while using low memory resources, aligning with the dataset's constraints and requirements. While it does have a weakness with CPU, it has a short training time and is capable of handling the required types of data without a significant memory overhead. Despite its GPU reliance, its compatibility with tabular data and high dimensionality makes it the best fit given the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling high-dimensional, tabular data in the medical domain, which matches well with the dataset tags. Despite its requirement for high memory, its compatibility with tabular data, scalability to large datasets, and short training time are beneficial. Additionally, it can be effective for high dimensionality data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Although it primarily utilizes GPU, its strengths align best with the dataset requirements compared to the other models available.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data in the medical domain, which are the characteristics of the dataset. It handles high dimensionality effectively and works well with tabular and medical data, despite its preference for GPU over CPU. It also offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which can be beneficial even with medium-sized datasets. Although it has weaknesses concerning CPU usage and low memory, its strengths align closely with the dataset's requirements and make it the best choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is chosen because it effectively handles high dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It is suitable for the healthcare/medical domain and can utilize a GPU, aligning well with the medium data size requirement. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data and high memory requirements, it remains as one of the best fits due to the dataset's specific need for handling high dimensionality efficiently and its scalability to larger datasets. Additionally, the models with higher compatibility with 'CPU' and 'low memory' requirements either do not handle high dimensionality as effectively or have significant weaknesses in tabular data handling, making Deep SVDD a balanced choice overall.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected because it supports tabular data and handles high dimensionality well, which matches the dataset's properties. It performs efficiently on healthcare data and can work with noisy data, which is typical in medical datasets. While it usually operates better with GPUs and consumes high memory, its short training time and scalability are advantageous. Despite its weakness of not being optimized for CPU, it still stands out among the available options given the balance between dataset needs and its strengths.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is a suitable choice because it supports tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset properties. Additionally, it operates well with medium-sized data and low memory requirements on a CPU. Although LUNAR has high memory weaknesses, the need for CPU and short training time align well with the dataset's additional requirements. It avoids weaknesses such as GPU-only strengths or long training time, making it an optimal choice given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties as it handles tabular data and high dimensionality effectively. Although it generally requires high memory and utilizes GPU, these characteristics should be manageable given that the data size is medium. Additionally, it can handle healthcare data, which aligns well with the medical domain context. Despite its preference for GPU, the medium data size and VAE's ability to process high dimensionality and tabular data make it a strong candidate. The CPU and low memory requirements may require customization or optimization, but VAE's other strengths align well with the key dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it is well-suited for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data in the medical domain. It handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, and is efficient with short training times. Although it requires high memory and prefers GPU, which is not ideal for a CPU-focused requirement, its strengths align closely with the dataset's nature, particularly for high dimensional medical tabular data. It is scalable to large datasets and suitable for healthcare applications, making it the best choice among the available models despite the low memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for the given dataset because it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It handles high dimensionality, a key characteristic of the dataset, and is strong in the medical domain. While VAE typically relies on a GPU, its short training time is an advantage given the medium data size. Although VAE has a weakness in being reliant on CPU, it is one of the few models in the list that supports the main dataset requirements, especially for a medium-sized, high-dimensional medical dataset, despite its high memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It is capable of handling medium-sized data and has a short training time. While it generally prefers GPU, the model's compatibility with healthcare and its strength in handling high-dimensional data make it a good choice, despite the requirement for low memory. Other models have more pronounced weaknesses concerning the dataset properties or the requirement for CPU use.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it effectively handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It also supports medical domains, making it well-suited for this application. While the model has a weakness with CPU and low memory, which are additional requirements, it still aligns better with the dataset tags compared to other models that either do not support tabular data or have significant weaknesses with medium-sized datasets and high dimensionality.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling tabular data, particularly in the medical domain with high dimensionality. It is also efficient with noisy data, which might be present in the dataset, and it has a short training time. Although it is not optimal for CPU and low memory usage, among the options, it offers the best balance in terms of dealing with high dimensional data and scalability suitable for a medium-sized dataset within the constraints provided.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is best suited for the given medical tabular dataset with high dimensionality. Although it requires high memory and is typically implemented on a GPU, its strengths align well with tabular data, healthcare domain, and high dimensionality, which are critical features of this dataset. Despite its weakness in CPU utilization and low memory environments, it has short training time and handles large datasets effectively, making it a suitable option given the characteristics listed.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable because it effectively handles tabular data and high dimensionality, which are characteristics of our dataset. Despite requiring high memory, it can run on a GPU which alleviates CPU and memory constraints. Additionally, it has short training time and scalability to large datasets, fitting well with the dataset's size and dimensions. Although it has limitations with imbalanced data, this is less critical compared to the strengths it offers concerning dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data with medical domain applications. Although it requires high memory, it is still the best fit because it handles high dimensionality, medical tabular data effectively, and offers scalability to large datasets. Its ability to manage imbalanced and sparse data also aligns with potential characteristics of medical datasets, making it a viable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it matches the dataset characteristics of high dimensionality and tabular data while being capable of handling medical data effectively. Although it has a weakness for CPU usage and low memory environments, its strengths align well with the dataset requirements, including the capability to manage high dimensionality in tabular formats. Other models either have significant weaknesses related to the provided dataset tags or are less suited to the domain and data type attributes.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular with high dimensionality in the medical domain, and the requirements include low memory and CPU processing. The AutoEncoder has strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, supports short training times, and has applicability in healthcare. Despite its weakness with low CPU, it aligns closely with the strengths required for the dataset characteristics when weighed against its competitors, which either face more severe constraints concerning CPU usage or memory requirements. AutoEncoder's proven effectiveness in similar high-dimensional and healthcare-related tasks makes it a suitable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice because it handles tabular data efficiently and is tailored for high dimensionality, both of which are pertinent characteristics of the dataset. Despite its computational intensity, the strengths such as scalable to large datasets compatibility, support for tabular data, and short training times align well with the dataset requirements. Additionally, LUNAR works efficiently on CPU environments and does not have constraints on memory, making it a suitable option when considering the given requirements of low memory and CPU usage.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and from the medical domain with high dimensionality, and it needs to be processed with low memory on a CPU. AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data and high dimensionality which fits well for the medical domain. Although it generally requires high memory and GPU, it still fulfills more criteria regarding data types and scalability compared to other models. It has a short training time, making it efficient for medium-sized datasets despite the constraints of requiring low memory and CPU.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected because it is strong with tabular data, healthcare applications, and handles high dimensionality well, aligning with the dataset characteristics. Although it typically requires high memory and GPU resources for training, which can be a weakness, it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it efficient with medium-sized datasets. Its support for noisy data is, in addition, useful for medical datasets, making it the most suitable choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data and the medical domain, meeting the key dataset characteristics. Although it requires high memory and GPU, it can handle high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which are the primary dataset requirements. Additionally, it offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which align with the medium data size requirement. The weaknesses related to CPU and low memory are less concerning given the overlap of strengths with the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for this dataset because it can handle high dimensionality and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Although it typically requires high memory and is GPU-optimized, among the available models, it is the most compatible with medical data. While its limitation of requiring high memory is noted, it does not specifically mention CPU as a weakness, making it more feasible for a CPU-centric requirement compared to other options. Its ability to manage imbalanced data and scalability to large datasets further makes it a strong candidate.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it excels in handling high dimensional, tabular data, which is aligned with the dataset's characteristics. It supports medical domains and requires high memory, aligning well with a medium data size. Although it has limitations with CPU usage, its strengths in high dimensionality and tabular data make it the most compatible with the dataset's requirements compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is the most suitable choice because it effectively handles tabular data with high dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, it is capable of scaling to medium-sized datasets as required, and it perfectly aligns with the medical domain context of the data. Even though it requires a GPU and has weaknesses like noisy data handling, the lack of necessity for low memory usage in this context allows Deep SVDD to be the ideal choice over other models that inadequately support CPU or low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality in the medical domain. It can handle high-dimensional datasets efficiently and supports medical and healthcare applications. While it typically requires a GPU and high memory, it offers a short training time and scalable performance for medium-sized datasets. Although the model generally prefers GPU for processing, no other models from the list provide a better match for the dataset characteristics and constraints of CPU and low memory while still being effective for medical applications.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is selected because of its suitability for handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which fits the dataset properties. It also efficiently processes medical data and is well-suited for health applications. Despite its preference for GPU, it requires high memory, which might not perfectly match the low memory requirement; however, its ability to handle noisy data, high dimensionality, and scalability to medium data sizes makes it the most suitable choice among the provided options.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable choice for this medical tabular dataset characterized by high dimensionality and medium size, since it supports high dimensionality and performs well on tabular data. While it typically benefits from GPU use and higher memory environments, it is capable of working with tabular healthcare data under the constraints described. Additionally, VAE has a short training time, which aligns with the need for efficiency. Despite its weakness with CPUs and low memory, its strengths align well with the dataset's characteristics in comparison to the other models.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular datasets, particularly in the medical domain. It supports high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Despite the CPU and low memory requirements, the AutoEncoder is a strong candidate due to its ability to handle high dimensionality and tabular data efficiently, having short training times and high scalability to large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data in the medical domain, especially when there are constraints on memory and CPU usage. While it typically leverages a GPU for best performance, its strengths in handling high dimensionality, and noisy data align well with the dataset properties, whereas its weaknesses do not conflict significantly with the given dataset requirements. Other models either do not handle tabular data well, require high memory, or are more suited for GPU-exclusive operations, making the AutoEncoder the best fit in this context.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected as it aligns well with the dataset properties, such as tabular data and medium data size. Although it does not explicitly mention the medical domain, its ability to handle tabular data and high dimensionality is suitable given the characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it offers scalability to large datasets and short training time, which are beneficial for handling medium data size efficiently. Even though it has a weakness in noisy data and higher memory requirements, the advantages align more closely with the CPU and low memory constraints, since it is computationally intensive yet capable of effective processing within those constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, fitting the dataset's characteristics of medium data size and high dimensionality. While it generally relies on GPU, it is designed for short training times and scalability to large datasets, which offset the limitation of CPU preference. Despite its weakness with discrete data, VAE's strengths in handling healthcare and medical applications make it a fitting choice given the domain of the dataset. Furthermore, although it is GPU-intensive, the model's efficiency in memory usage relative to the task makes it a viable option for this specific scenario considering the low memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It supports high dimensionality and the tabular data type, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it performs well in the medical domain and has a short training time, suitable for medium data sizes. Although it typically leverages GPU, its ability to handle high dimensional data with low memory makes it an appropriate choice despite the CPU requirement scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is also adept in the medical domain, which is relevant here. Despite its strengths in requiring high memory and GPU, its short training time and ability to handle scalable datasets make it a strong candidate. Although it has a weakness concerning low memory and CPU constraints, it balances these with its capabilities to manage tabular data efficiently in a medium data size context.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset involves tabular medical data with high dimensionality and requires low memory usage on a CPU. AutoEncoder is suitable for high-dimensional and tabular data, especially in healthcare. Although it typically benefits from GPU and high memory, its ability to handle large datasets and short training time make it a practical choice given the medium-sized dataset. Despite its weaknesses with small data size and CPU, its strengths more closely align with the dataset features compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is suitable for the dataset because it handles high-dimensional tabular data well, especially in the medical domain. It is optimized for high memory and GPU usage, which is ideal given the low memory requirement where we can still achieve short training time using a time-efficient algorithm. Although the dataset requires CPU compatibility, the strengths of the AutoEncoder in dealing with high-dimensional medical data make it a strong choice, balancing performance with training duration limitations.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for this medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular dataset in the medical domain, even when considering the constraints of CPU usage and low memory. Its strengths align closely with the dataset requirements: it handles tabular data and high dimensionality effectively, and it is known for its scalability and relatively short training times. Despite its preference for GPU, the focus on high dimensionality and tabular data in combination with its strengths outweigh the fact no model perfectly suits the CPU and low memory conditions. The AutoEncoder is therefore the best choice given the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it supports high dimensionality, medical domain, and tabular data, which are key properties of the dataset. It is also efficient for tabular data analysis, despite its weakness in CPU and low memory requirements. However, considering medical domain and tabular data with high dimensionality, AE1SVM can leverage its strengths effectively for this data type, tagging it as the most aligned with the dataset properties among the options.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected because it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it is suitable for medical domains and can handle noisy data well, which is often a concern in medical datasets. Although it typically requires high memory, the short training time and scalability make it a good choice for a medium-sized dataset on a CPU with low memory requirements, provided that training configurations are optimized.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the dataset characteristics. It is strong in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, both of which are key aspects of this dataset. Additionally, it supports healthcare/medical domain applications, which aligns with the dataset's domain. It performs well with noisy data (another characteristic of this dataset) and offers short training times, which is beneficial for CPU usage despite being a bit more oriented towards GPU. While it has a noted weakness on small datasets, this dataset is medium-sized, thus mitigating that concern. Though not optimized for low memory, AutoEncoder's other strengths outweigh this consideration when compared to other models on the list.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is suitable for the dataset because it handles high dimensionality and works well with tabular data, which aligns with the dataset properties. It is also strong in the medical domain and can operate efficiently with medium-sized datasets. Although it has a weakness with CPU usage, it excels in short training time and scalability, making it a good fit for the requirement of low memory usage, even if this could be a concern. Its strengths in working with high-dimensional datasets outweigh its weaknesses for this specific use case.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is well-suited for tabular medical data with high dimensionality, as indicated by its strengths in high dimensionality, healthcare, tabular data, and scalability to large datasets. Although VAE has a weakness on CPUs, given the dataset requirements for CPU and low memory, the VAE may still be a reasonable choice as none of the other models perfectly fit all aspects. VAE's strengths align well with the medical domain and tabular data characteristics, making it a suitable choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is selected because it is suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset properties. It also performs well in healthcare and medical domains and can handle noisy data, which are crucial aspects for the current dataset. Despite its weakness of requiring high memory, it aligns with the low memory requirement under CPU usage better than other model options, as other models have more significant weaknesses regarding CPU and memory usage. Additionally, AutoEncoder offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets, which are advantageous given the medium data size.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AE1SVM model is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties and constraints. It supports high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Moreover, its ability to handle medical data further aligns with the domain. While AE1SVM can operate well with GPUs, the constraint of CPU and low memory is a noted weakness; however, among the options, it still offers the best fit due to its compatibility with medium-sized datasets and short training time. The model also scales to large datasets, which means it can efficiently handle the medium data size without the limitations of small data size affecting its performance.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is suitable for the given tabular medical dataset with high dimensionality and medium data size. It handles high dimensionality well and supports healthcare applications, which aligns with the domain requirement. Despite being optimized for GPU, it demonstrates a short training time and scalability to large datasets which is advantageous for this medium-sized dataset. While it requires high memory, the mention of CPU and low memory may pose constraints, but AutoEncoder's strength in handling high dimensionality and medical tabular data makes it the best fit from the provided list.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data well, which fits the dataset tags provided. It is also strong in the medical domain. Although it is typically GPU-optimized and high memory intensive, its strengths align well with the high dimensionality and tabular nature of the data, making it more appropriate for the dataset properties compared to other models. Despite having weaknesses in low memory and CPU environments, these constraints are the least conflicting given the options available.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the best choice because it handles tabular data efficiently and is robust for high dimensionality data which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it is suitable for the medical domain and can operate under low memory conditions while having a short training time. Even though it has a weakness for CPU usage, it has overall strengths aligning with the dataset properties, making it more suitable compared to other models which show significant incompatibilities with tabular data or low memory requirements.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: mnist\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"images\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"education\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"high dimensionality\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"GPU\", \"high memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is particularly well-suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling images and high-dimensional data, which aligns with the characteristics of the dataset. It also supports GPU usage and handles high memory demands well. Additionally, VAE is known for efficient training times and scalability to large datasets, making it suitable for the medium-sized dataset described. Moreover, its application in the education domain makes it a strong fit for the dataset's domain requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is highly suitable for the given dataset as it is strong in handling images and high-dimensional data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, VAE is capable of utilizing GPU and high memory, making it ideal for the dataset's additional requirements. VAE is also noted for handling high dimensionality and noisy data well, which are relevant to the dataset. It supports large datasets and has a short training time, making it efficient for medium-sized educational image data.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is highly suitable for a medium-sized image dataset with high dimensionality, requiring GPU and high memory. It is known for handling images and high-dimensional data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, VAE fits well in the education domain and has strengths in handling noisy data, which may be beneficial. The model also supports high memory requirements and has a short training time, aligning well with the dataset's additional constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is highly suitable for image data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It supports GPU usage and requires high memory, aligning with the additional dataset requirements. Moreover, it performs well with noisy data and is optimized for short training times, making it efficient for a medium-sized educational dataset. Its weaknesses, such as struggles with discrete data and imbalanced data, are not matched by the dataset characteristics, making VAE an optimal choice among the provided models.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the educational domain and images, is capable of handling high-dimensional data, and benefits from GPU and high memory resources. It also boasts short training times for large datasets, aligning with the dataset's medium size and image nature. While it has weaknesses in handling real-time and discrete data, these are not identified as properties in the dataset tags, making it the most suitable model for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is well-suited for the given dataset properties as it excels with images and high-dimensional data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. The VAE's strengths in education, high memory requirements, GPU utilization, and handling of noisy data align well with the dataset tags. Furthermore, VAE is scalable to large datasets and supports short training times, making it the best choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the best choice as it handles high dimensionality, requires high memory and GPU, aligns well with image data types, and is specifically mentioned to be used in education. It also provides short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is suitable for the medium-sized image dataset described. The weaknesses of VAE, such as issues with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, do not impact this dataset significantly.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for processing image data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It can utilize GPU and high memory, crucial for efficient performance with the given requirements. Additionally, VAE's strength in handling noisy data and short training time make it an ideal choice for an educational domain dataset that is medium-sized and potentially noisy. Other models have weaknesses with image data or don't align as closely with the dataset's needs in terms of GPU and memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is described as medium-sized, consists of images, has high dimensionality, and requires GPU and high memory resources. The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model aligns well with these dataset characteristics. It is designed to handle images and high-dimensional data, works efficiently on GPUs, and can manage large datasets given its scalability and short training time. Additionally, VAE is suited for the educational domain, which is a key aspect of the dataset. While VAE has limitations with discrete or categorical data, these are not relevant in this context, making VAE the most suitable choice from the list.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for working with images, especially in the education domain, which often involves high-dimensional data. The dataset requires high memory and is GPU compatible, aligning with VAE's strengths. Additionally, VAE is capable of handling large datasets efficiently, has a short training time, and can manage noisy data. These characteristics align well with the dataset tags provided.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for medium-sized image datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties. It leverages GPUs for efficient computation, supports high memory usage, and offers short training times. The model's strengths in high-dimensional image data and its applicability in the educational domain make it the most suitable choice from the list, despite minor weaknesses like handling imbalanced data or sparse data, which do not apply to the current scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is optimal for this medium-sized image dataset from the education domain due to its strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and its capability to leverage GPU and high memory effectively. It offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it well-suited for educational data with potential complexity and volume. Additionally, VAE's ability to handle noisy data aligns well with the dataset characteristics, ensuring robust performance.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for the given dataset properties as it excels in handling images with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It also supports GPU usage and requires high memory, both of which align with the additional requirements. Furthermore, VAE is applicable to the education domain and has a short training time, making it a practical choice with scalability to large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it is well-suited for high-dimensional image data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is also specifically mentioned as an appropriate model for the education domain. Additionally, VAE can handle noisy data, utilizes a GPU for its processes, supports high memory requirements, and is efficient with large datasets - all of which align with the dataset tags. Although it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and certain real-time or sparse datasets, these do not conflict with the given dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is specifically designed for image data and supports high dimensionality, aligning perfectly with the dataset characteristics. It can handle noisy data, which is beneficial for image datasets that might have artifacts or variations. Additionally, VAE is compatible with GPU and high memory requirements, making it feasible for medium-sized datasets that may demand substantial computational resources. Its short training time and scalability to large datasets further enhance its suitability for scenarios within the educational domain that may involve iterative development and deployment.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it specifically excels in handling images and high dimensionality, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it supports GPU and high memory requirements, important for efficient processing of the images with the given hardware constraints. Unlike other models such as DevNet or LUNAR which are weak with images, or MO-GAAL which has issues with interpretability, the VAE is well-suited for educational image datasets, making it the optimal choice.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for medium-sized image datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties. It excels in handling image data, supports GPU and high memory requirements, and offers short training time, making it efficient for educational applications. Additionally, its ability to manage high dimensionality and noisy data further aligns with the dataset characteristics, making it the most suitable choice from the given model list.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is well-suited for this dataset as it has strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and education domain, which aligns perfectly with the dataset properties. It is optimized for use with GPUs and supports high memory requirements, which matches the additional requirements of the dataset. Additionally, it can manage large datasets with short training times, ensuring efficiency in model training. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, which are not relevant to this dataset, VAE provides good generalization capabilities for high-dimensional imagery data in educational contexts.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is a suitable choice because it is well-suited for handling images, which are high-dimensional data. It also supports the education domain, aligns with the high dimensionality characteristic, and can efficiently utilize a GPU for processing. Moreover, VAE handles high memory requirements and performs well on medium-sized datasets with short training times, making it highly compatible with the dataset's properties and additional requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It excels with images and handles high dimensionality efficiently, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it benefits from GPU support and high memory usage, which matches the additional dataset requirements. Given that the data size is medium, the model's ability to work well with large datasets without requiring real-time data makes it a strong fit. Its short training time is an added advantage.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and the educational domain, coupled with its ability to utilize GPU and high memory effectively. Additionally, it offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns perfectly with the dataset's requirements. The dataset's medium size and lack of specific characteristics such as sparseness or imbalance make VAE's weaknesses less significant in this context.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, image-based, high-dimensional, and requires GPU and high memory, which aligns well with VAE's strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and utilizing GPU and high memory efficiently. VAE also supports education datasets and offers short training time, making it suitable for medium-sized datasets. Despite its weakness with imbalanced data, there is no evidence suggesting the dataset suffers from this issue, making VAE the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset as it specifically addresses requirements such as image data, high dimensionality, and high memory, which align with the dataset characteristics. It can efficiently process image datasets in the education domain, supporting high dimensional data in a GPU environment. Additionally, VAE offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it an excellent choice given the medium data size and other requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties which include images, medium data size, high dimensionality, and requires GPU and high memory. VAE excels in handling images and high dimensional data, it requires a GPU and supports high memory use, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. Moreover, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which adds flexibility for scalability beyond medium-sized data.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It handles images and high-dimensional data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, VAE supports GPU and requires high memory, matching the additional requirements. Its short training time and scalability to large datasets make it a suitable choice for a medium-sized dataset in the education domain. While it has some weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, these do not majorly impact the suitability for the given dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It excels with images, handles high dimensionality, and is compatible with educational domains. Additionally, VAE supports GPU and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. The strengths of VAE, including short training time and scalability to large datasets, further make it an ideal choice over other models despite its weakness with discrete or categorical data and real-time use, which are not major considerations for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is highly suitable as it excels with image data and high dimensionality, aligns well with the educational domain, and benefits from GPU and high memory, which are necessary given the additional requirements. Its short training time and scalability to large datasets also make it well-suited for a medium-sized dataset in this context.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for this scenario as it is well-suited for image data, which is a dataset tag. VAE also supports high dimensionality and requires GPU and high memory, aligning with the additional requirements. Its strengths in handling educational domain data and its scalability to large datasets align well with the dataset properties. The weaknesses of VAE, such as issues with discrete data and imbalance, do not conflict with the dataset properties provided.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is highly suitable for the given dataset properties. It is designed to handle images, works well with high dimensionality, and is specifically tailored for domains like education. It supports GPU and high memory requirements, which align with the additional dataset requirements. Additionally, VAE is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it a strong match for a medium-sized dataset requiring efficient computation. Although it struggles with discrete data and real-time applications, these weaknesses do not conflict with the current dataset properties, making VAE the most appropriate choice.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It is well-suited for image data and can handle high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, VAE is optimized for scenarios requiring high memory and GPU usage, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. Furthermore, VAE's strengths in domains like education and high dimensionality make it a strong candidate for this application, especially since it supports short training times and scalability to handle medium-sized datasets effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for the dataset due to its strengths in handling images and high dimensionality, which align with the dataset characteristics. It also supports GPU usage and high memory requirements. Furthermore, VAE has short training time and scales well to large datasets, which caters to the medium data size specified. Additionally, it is effective in domains like education, which matches the domain tag of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is characterized by medium data size, high dimensionality, and consists of images, which makes it suitable for models that are designed to work well with images and handle high dimensionality. VAE possesses strengths in processing images, handling high dimensional data, and education domain applications. It also supports GPU and high memory, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. Moreover, VAE is capable of handling noisy data, offers short training time, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable choice for this dataset. It aligns well with the dataset properties, particularly given the medium data size and the high dimensionality of images, which are within its strengths. VAE handles images efficiently and is well-suited for educational domain applications. It also supports GPU and high memory requirements, ensuring optimal performance. Additionally, VAE has a short training time and scalability, making it useful for datasets of this size and type. While other models have some overlapping strengths, VAE stands out due to its specific alignment with the educational domain and image data characteristics, as well as its robustness against high dimensionality and noise.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset and task requirements. It handles images and high dimensionality well, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. VAE also supports GPU usage and requires high memory, both of which are noted requirements. It has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Furthermore, VAE's strengths in the education domain specifically align with the dataset's domain tag, making it an optimal choice.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized datasets consisting of images, as it is specifically strong in handling high-dimensional data types common in education. It efficiently utilizes GPU capabilities and high memory, aligning perfectly with the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, VAE offers short training times and effective scalability to large datasets, which is advantageous for datasets with high dimensionality.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling images and high dimensionality, which align with the dataset properties. It also fits within the educational domain and has the capability to leverage GPU for processing high memory requirements. Additionally, it has a relatively short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it efficient for medium-sized datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a strong candidate due to its suitability for image data and its capability to handle high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It also supports GPU and high memory requirements, which are additional requirements for the dataset. The VAE model has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it well-suited for the medium-sized dataset in an educational domain. Additionally, VAE's strengths in handling noise and working with image data make it the best fit among the models listed.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties because it excels in handling images with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset's characteristics, while also supporting GPU and high memory requirements. It is also scalable to large datasets, making it a strong choice for educational domains where high dimensionality is involved. Additionally, VAE's short training time is advantageous compared to others with long training durations that do not sufficiently align with the dataset's needs.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is highly suitable because it has strengths that align closely with the dataset properties: it is effective for high-dimensional image data, fits well within the education domain, and leverages GPUs and high memory, which match the additional requirements. Additionally, it handles large datasets and noisy data efficiently, making it the best choice given the specified dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the best choice for this dataset as it is well-suited for images and benefits from high dimensionality, both of which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it requires high memory and can leverage GPU, aligning perfectly with the additional requirements. VAE has short training times and can handle large datasets, making it an efficient option for the medium-sized dataset. The model is also applicable to the education domain and tolerates noisy data, making it an ideal fit considering the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties due to its strengths in handling images and high-dimensional data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, VAE is optimized for high memory environments and utilizes GPUs, making it appropriate for educational applications that may involve extensive computations. While it may not be suited for discrete data, the primary requirement here is image data processing, where VAE excels. Furthermore, VAE allows for short training times and can manage large datasets effectively, fulfilling the dataset’s additional requirements of high memory and GPU utilization.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is the most suitable model because it excels in handling image data and high-dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset properties. It is also optimized for scenarios that require GPU and high memory usage, matching the additional requirements. VAE is well-suited for educational domains and has a short training time, which is beneficial given the medium data size. Its ability to process large datasets effectively and its strengths in handling noisy data further make it a strong candidate for this task.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model as it effectively handles image data with high dimensionality, meets the requirement for GPU and high memory, and supports educational domains. VAE's strengths align with the dataset's needs, including short training time and scalability to large datasets. It is specifically mentioned as strong in images and education, making it a top choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is a suitable choice because it is strong in handling image data which is high-dimensional and requires high memory, making it compatible with the dataset characteristics. It supports GPU training for efficient computation which aligns with the additional requirements of the dataset. Furthermore, it has strengths in domains related to education and it can efficiently work on medium-sized datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for images with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also supports high memory and GPU requirements, as specified in the additional requirements. VAE demonstrates strong performance in educational domains and has short training times, making it a practical choice given the dataset's medium size. Moreover, its ability to handle large datasets and noisy data further complements the dataset properties, making it the most suitable choice from the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for this medium-sized image dataset in the education domain because it supports high dimensionality and has strengths in handling images. It also leverages GPU and high memory effectively, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, VAE is efficient for datasets expecting short training times, and its applicability to large datasets is beneficial for scalability. Its strengths in the education domain further make it a fitting choice.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized image datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns perfectly with the dataset tags provided. It is designed for image data and supports high dimensionality, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Moreover, it capitalizes on GPU usage and requires high memory, fitting the additional requirements. Although not specifically developed for real-time data or imbalanced datasets, VAE's strengths in short training time, compatibility with large datasets, and educational domain applicability make it the most suitable choice among the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset as it is strong in handling images, high dimensionality, and education domain datasets. It efficiently leverages GPU and supports high memory requirements, making it apt for high-computation tasks. Additionally, VAE has a short training time and scalability to large datasets, aligning well with the data size and additional requirements provided. Its weaknesses in categorical data and imbalanced data do not significantly affect the dataset characteristics, enhancing its suitability.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model based on the dataset properties. It excels with image data, handles high dimensionality well, is specifically beneficial for the education domain, and works efficiently with GPUs and high memory environments. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the 'medium' data size and other dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is highly suitable as it aligns well with the dataset properties. It is strong in handling images and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Moreover, VAE is optimized for GPU usage and benefits from high memory, which are specified additional requirements. Furthermore, it performs well in educational domains and is suitable for large datasets, matching the medium data size of the dataset. While it has some weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these are not relevant concerns given the current dataset properties.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: arrhythmia\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"medical\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"high dimensionality\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also suitable for the medical domain and operates effectively even with imbalanced data, an essential consideration here. While it is more efficient with GPU, it can still manage with CPU constraints given its strengths. The model also provides short training time, making it viable for medium-sized datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it handles high dimensionality, medical domain, and tabular data effectively. It also scales well to large datasets without significant training time implications, which suits the medium-sized dataset. The presence of high dimensionality is particularly well managed by AE1SVM. Other models like VAE and AutoEncoder, although strong in similar areas, have weaknesses that disqualify them for CPU usage, which is a key requirement here.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for medium-sized, high dimensional tabular data in the medical domain, which aligns with the dataset tags. It supports high dimensionality, is efficient in training time, and is scalable to large datasets. Although the dataset requires CPU support, the focus is more on handling high dimensionality in tabular data, making AutoEncoder the most fitting choice with its ability to manage noisy data and its applicability in healthcare.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the best choice for this dataset because it aligns well with the dataset properties: it is capable of handling high dimensionality and tabular data, both of which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, AE1SVM is effective in the medical domain. While it does perform better with a GPU, it can still perform well with CPU resources if high memory is not a limiting factor, making it suitable for the given requirement. Despite some weaknesses, its strengths closely match the dataset requirements compared to other models on the list.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for the given dataset because it handles tabular data effectively, which aligns with the dataset tag 'tabular data'. It also performs well with high dimensionality, matching the dataset's 'high dimensionality' characteristic. While VAE is weaker on 'CPU', it excels in short training time, making it a practical choice for a medium-sized dataset in the medical domain. The medical strength of VAE and its capability with high-dimensional and noisy data make it a suitable option compared to other models within the provided list.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is highly suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality and aligns well with the medical domain. It supports high dimensional datasets and is efficient in handling noisy data, which is beneficial given the dataset's characteristics. Although it prefers GPU, its other strengths in handling tabular data and fast training times make it a practical choice, especially considering the medium-sized dataset. Other models have limitations with tabular data or CPU usage that make them less suitable for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AE1SVM model is chosen because it handles high-dimensional tabular data effectively, as well as medical and imbalanced data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It also supports scalability to large datasets and requires a relatively short training time, which compensates for the CPU requirement stated in the dataset tags. While AE1SVM has weaknesses such as CPU utilization, it still aligns more closely with the dataset needs compared to the other models provided, which either prefer GPU or have limited applicability to tabular medical data.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AE1SVM model is well-suited for the given dataset, which is characterized by medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data in the medical domain, and needs to run on a CPU. AE1SVM supports high dimensionality and performs well on tabular and medical data. Although its strengths mention GPU usage, it also indicates short training time and scalable solutions, making it possibly adaptable to CPU scenarios. It handles imbalanced and sparse data efficiently, which aligns with common challenges in medical datasets. Despite its weakness on noisy data, its compatibility with tabular data and medical domain make it more appropriate than other options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is a suitable choice given the dataset characteristics. It is well-suited for tabular data and high-dimensional datasets, which matches the dataset's properties. The model also handles medical domain data effectively and supports scalability to medium-sized datasets. While AE1SVM is not strong with CPU, its strengths, including short training time and capability to work with tabular data, high dimensionality, and medical domain data, align well with the dataset requirements, making it the best-fit model from the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics: it handles tabular data and is noted for performing well on high dimensional data, which is a key aspect of the dataset. It’s also suitable for medium data sizes and medical domains. While AE1SVM leverages GPU, which isn't fully compatible with the CPU requirement, it does support short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it advantageous for efficient processing and scalability of the high-dimensional medical data.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM suits the dataset's high dimensionality and tabular data type effectively. It supports medical domains and offers scalability to medium-sized datasets, which aligns with the dataset's medium size. While it's optimized for GPU, it does have a short training time that mitigates the requirement for CPU use. Its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data make it an appropriate choice for this context.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is suitable for this dataset because it handles tabular data effectively, supports high dimensionality, and is applicable in the medical domain, aligning well with the dataset characteristics. Despite its weakness on CPU usage, its strengths in handling medium-sized, high-dimensional datasets with short training times make it the best choice among the models available.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the best choice for this dataset because it supports high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. It is also suitable for medical data, which aligns with the domain specified. Despite its weaknesses with CPU usage, it offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it a viable option for medium-sized datasets. Additionally, it is designed for applications requiring high dimensionality and tabular data processing, making it the most appropriate model from the list provided.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, medical, and characterized by high dimensionality. AE1SVM is well-suited for high dimensionality, tabular data, and medical domains. It also works well with CPU, which matches the additional requirement of the dataset. Although it is more efficient with GPUs, it still can leverage high memory and deliver short training times. Other considerations, such as scalability and the ability to handle medium-sized datasets, make AE1SVM the most balanced choice given these constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data in the medical domain, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It handles high dimensionality effectively and is known for short training times. It is scalable to large datasets, which is beneficial given the medium data size. Although it prefers GPU, it can still operate on a CPU for medium-sized data. Its weaknesses, like imbalanced data handling, are less relevant for the given dataset description.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is best suited for the given dataset properties because it supports tabular data and has strengths in handling high-dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It is also a strong choice for medical data, a feature of the domain. Although it typically uses GPU, its scalability and short training time enable efficient usage even with CPU constraints. While some weaknesses like CPU limitation exist, the alignment with dataset characteristics makes it the best choice from the provided options.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it effectively handles high dimensionality and is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. The model is ideal for medical data, which aligns with the dataset's domain requirement. Although it is better suited for GPU, it can manage short training times and handle large datasets efficiently. Given the requirement for a CPU and the constraints of the other models (such as AnoGAN's weakness for tabular data and VAE's weakness for CPU usage), AE1SVM is the most appropriate choice from the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset because it supports tabular data in the medical domain and is adept at handling high dimensionality. It has strengths in scenarios requiring high dimensionality and tabular data, aligning well with the dataset properties. Additionally, it is adequate for high dimensionality, which is pivotal for this dataset characteristic. Although its strengths usually involve GPU utilization, its capacity to manage high-dimensional data and support for tabular data make it a strong candidate even for CPU-based processing.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and requirements. It excels in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, AE1SVM performs well in the medical domain and supports CPU usage, meeting the dataset's additional requirement. While it may have long training times on CPU, its ability to handle medium-sized datasets with high dimensionalities in the medical field makes it a strong candidate. Compared to other models, its pertinent strengths align well with the dataset needs, and its weaknesses do not significantly impact the dataset's defined characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset as it effectively handles tabular data with high dimensionality and is designed for medical domains, which align with the dataset properties. Additionally, it supports CPUs, which matches the computing requirements, and offers short training time and scalability to large datasets. While AE1SVM is weak on CPUs, it outperforms other models in strengths relevant to this dataset's characteristics without conflicting weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized and tabular with high dimensionality, and the requirement is to run on CPU. AE1SVM excels with tabular data and high dimensionality. Although it is stronger with GPU, it can still handle high dimensionality efficiently. While CPU and low memory are marked as weaknesses for AE1SVM, the model's capabilities in handling tabular medical datasets with high dimensionality make it the best choice among the available models, despite the trade-off with the CPU preference.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular medical data with a CPU requirement. AE1SVM excels in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which fits well with the dataset properties. Although AE1SVM prefers GPU for high memory capacity, it compensates with short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it a suitable choice given the dataset characteristics and the requirement to utilize CPU given other models' constraints with CPU or training time.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset properties include medium data size, tabular data, and high dimensionality in the medical domain, with a requirement for CPU-based processing. AE1SVM is well-suited for high-dimensional and tabular data in medical applications. While it does prefer GPU for optimal performance, it can still function effectively with CPU. Its strengths align well with the dataset's high dimensionality and tabular nature, making it the most suitable choice from the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice because it handles high-dimensional tabular data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset tags of 'medium' data size and 'high dimensionality'. AE1SVM's strengths also include support for 'medical' domain data, and while it is optimized for GPU usage, it offers short training times and large dataset scalability, making it a promising fit for the 'CPU' requirement, given that it can capitalize on existing CPU resources efficiently, despite its GPU preference. Additionally, its ability to manage imbalanced and sparse data is advantageous if the dataset contains such characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also suitable for the medical domain. While the dataset requires CPU processing, AE1SVM generally copes well with medium-sized datasets, and its short training time is beneficial. Despite its CPU weakness, its compatibility with the dataset's properties and requirements outweighs this drawback compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it supports high dimensionality, tabular data, and medical domain data which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it is capable of medium data sizes and can handle high memory, short training time, and scalability, making it well paired with a CPU environment even though it's optimized for GPU. Its weaknesses such as small data sizes and long training time on CPU are not major limitations given the dataset's medium size and additional CPU requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is a suitable choice because it supports high dimensionality, works well with tabular data, and is applicable in the medical domain, all of which align with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, although it mentions GPU compatibility, it doesn't have CPU listed as a weakness, making it viable for CPU-based deployment. Its ability to handle large datasets with high dimensionality makes it a strong candidate for this task, given the dataset is of medium size and high dimensionality.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset characterized by medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data in the medical domain with CPU availability. It is specifically strong in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. AE1SVM also excels in the medical domain. Although it prefers GPU, it is capable of leveraging high memory and providing short training times, which can help mitigate its CPU limitation. Other models have weaknesses such as long training times, a preference for GPU, or worse compatibility with tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the best choice because it is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It has strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, sparse data, and medical domains, which are key aspects of this dataset. Although it does use high memory and has a weakness for CPU usage, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it a good fit given the dataset size and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it supports high dimensionality and tabular data, and is specifically noted for applications in the medical domain, which fits the dataset characteristics. Despite being listed as requiring a GPU and having a weakness on CPU, its suitability on tabular data, capability to handle high dimensionality, and applicability to medical data make it the best match among the given options. Additionally, it has a short training time and can handle imbalanced data, relevant qualities for this project.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is chosen because it effectively handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which are core characteristics of the dataset. It is also suited for medical data, which aligns with the dataset's domain. Although it has CPU as a weakness, AE1SVM’s strengths in high dimensional data and tabular data usage outweigh this specific requirement, making it the most aligned with the dataset's properties compared to other models on the list.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It handles tabular data with high dimensionality and is explicitly marked for use in the medical domain. Furthermore, it can operate well with imbalanced and sparse data, which are common in medical datasets. Despite having a preference for GPU, it is the best compromise given the requirement to use a CPU, as other models with better CPU compatibility either do not support high dimensionality well or lack medical domain suitability.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder excels in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and is suitable for the medical domain, aligning well with the dataset properties. It also supports scalable analysis with its GPU capability and short training time, which is advantageous given the medium data size and high dimensionality. Despite the additional requirement for CPU, AutoEncoder's strengths in the relevant data type and characteristics make it a more suitable option over other models whose weaknesses align more significantly with the dataset characteristics, such as CPU-dependency or poor performance on tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset tags because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It supports medical domain data, which is specifically required here. Although it traditionally leverages GPU, it can be adapted for CPU use without major drawbacks. Additionally, it offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, fitting the medium-sized data requirement. Other models may not support the CPU as well or lack comprehensive alignment with both data type and domain needs.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for medium-sized, high-dimensional, tabular medical data, which are the characteristics of the dataset in question. It supports tabular data and works well under high-dimensional conditions, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. While it requires a GPU and typically high memory for better performance, AE1SVM is capable of short training times and is scalable to large datasets, ensuring efficient processing within the resources on a CPU is the additional requirement here. Despite the CPU requirement being less optimal for AE1SVM, its strengths in handling high dimensional tabular data in the medical domain make it the most suitable choice compared to other options.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for the dataset properties as it supports tabular data, high dimensionality, and the medical domain. Although it prefers a GPU, its weaknesses regarding CPU are less critical compared to alternatives. Additionally, AE1SVM is robust to high-dimensional data and has a short training time, making it a better fit for a medium-sized dataset with high dimensionality constraints, unlike other models that have significant weaknesses with tabular data or CPU usage.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling high-dimensional tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is designed for medical domains and performs well with medium-sized datasets. Although it usually operates with a GPU, CPU can suffice if memory is managed appropriately. AE1SVM's strengths in tabular and medical data, combined with its ability to handle high dimensionality, make it the best choice given the dataset properties and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling high-dimensional and tabular data, which align with the dataset properties. It is also well-suited for medium-sized datasets typically found in the medical domain. Additionally, it supports CPU usage, which is a requirement. Although it has weaknesses with CPU performance, it is comparatively more suitable than others given the dataset properties and model characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which are key properties of the dataset. It is designed for medical applications, aligning with the domain requirement. Additionally, it offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which fits the medium data size requirement. Although CPU is listed as a weakness, AE1SVM's strengths closely match the dataset characteristics better than other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset characteristics and requirements. It offers strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, both of which are traits of the dataset in question. Additionally, AE1SVM is applicable to medical domains and can efficiently operate with a short training time, despite its weakness with CPU-based implementations. Other models either lack one or more of these critical strengths or have limitations that make them less suitable for the given requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model considering the dataset properties and requirements. It is effective with tabular, high-dimensional data commonly found in medical domains, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. It offers strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data and is scalable to medium-sized datasets. Though it prefers GPU over CPU, its strengths outweigh others that either focus mainly on image data or require longer training times on CPU. AutoEncoder's suitability for healthcare and its efficient training time make it the best fit for these requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It handles high-dimensional tabular data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. AE1SVM also handles medical data proficiently and performs well with medium-sized datasets. While it requires GPU and has high memory needs, these are not listed as constraints. Its features of short training time and scalability to large datasets further make it preferable.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is designed for medical domain applications, offers scalability to large datasets, and has a short training time, making it efficient on CPU despite its preference for GPU. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, its strengths overlap significantly with the dataset requirements, making it the most suitable choice among the options.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it is designed to handle tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, the AutoEncoder is known for its strengths in healthcare and can efficiently manage noisy data while providing a scalable solution for medium-sized datasets. Although the CPU requirement is a weakness, the balance of other strengths makes it a better fit compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model highly aligns with the dataset's characteristics and requirements. It supports tabular data, which is the data type of the dataset. It also handles high dimensionality well, a key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, the model performs efficiently with medium data sizes and provides scalability to larger datasets, making it suitable for the given dataset size. Although it requires a GPU for optimal performance, it excels in healthcare and medical domains and can handle noisy data, making it a suitable choice despite the additional CPU requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for the dataset as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, aligning with the medical domain. It also supports CPUs, which matches the requirement, despite its general preference for GPUs. Though it has longer training times, its strengths in tabular data and medical applications make it the best fit among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is a suitable choice as it supports tabular data and is effective for datasets with high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. Although it requires a GPU for optimal performance, it is mentioned as scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the medium-sized dataset requirement. Additionally, it is robust with noisy data, which is beneficial in the medical domain, even though the preference for CPU could be a limitation, the AutoEncoder's strengths outweigh this consideration.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is a suitable model for the given dataset as it handles tabular data effectively and is proficient in managing high dimensionality, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also aligns well with medical domain requirements and supports GPU, which is a preferable condition since CPU is not a strength. While AE1SVM does have a weakness regarding CPU, this is outweighed by the strengths it offers for handling the task at hand. It also boasts short training times and scales well to large datasets, ensuring performance is maintained across the medium-sized dataset provided.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is also adept in medical domains and offers short training time, making it a good fit for CPU-based requirements. Despite its weakness on CPU usage, its capabilities in handling high-dimensional medical tabular data outweigh this limitation, making it the most suitable choice among the given models.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality, aligns well with the medical domain, and performs efficiently in terms of both training time and scalability to large datasets. Despite requiring a GPU for optimal performance, its compatibility with tabular data and the medical domain makes it a suitable choice from the provided options given the dataset's characteristics and CPU requirements are secondary to dimensionality and domain match.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: pendigits\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"large\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"time series\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"low-signal data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\", \"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it can handle large datasets and is scalable to large datasets, which suits the 'large' data size tag. Despite not being specifically labeled for 'time series', its emphasis on high dimensionality and scalability could offer a flexible approach to handling time series data. Although it shows weaknesses with 'low memory', there isn't another model better suited that sufficiently matches the strengths needed alongside CPU compatibility. Its handling of high dimensionality aligns well with the needs typically associated with time series data, even if the signal is low.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it supports large datasets and is scalable, which aligns with the dataset's 'large' size property. While it is generally strong in handling sparse and imbalanced data with GPU support, its compatibility with time-series data is limited. However, compared to other models, it has the advantage of being capable of handling large datasets with relatively low computational resources, and it offers short training times. Its weaknesses in hyperparameter sensitivity can be managed, and the computational intensity can be mitigated by its short training time and scalability.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for large datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties of a large time series dataset. While it has weaknesses related to CPU and low memory use, there are no models perfectly matching these needs specifically for time series and low-signal data. AE1SVM is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it a better compromise than the other models, which have more critical weaknesses for this dataset type.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected as it supports large datasets and is scalable. It can handle high dimensionality and noisy data, which are pertinent to the dataset characteristics. Although it requires GPU and high memory, it can adapt to CPU with optimizations. While it does have a weakness in low-signal data, this is outweighed by the strengths applicable to large time series datasets. None of the other models fully address the requirements and constraints presented as effectively as AutoEncoder does.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Although time series data and low-signal data are noted weaknesses for LUNAR, it matches the constraints of requiring low memory usage and CPU compatibility better than other options. Additionally, it is suitable for large datasets and has short training time which is important for scalability and computational efficiency on CPU. Given the limitations of other models with CPU, low memory, and low-signal capabilities, LUNAR is the best fit from the available options, despite its weaknesses in handling time series data.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a large time series with low-signal data, requiring low memory and CPU efficiency. SO-GAAL, although not specifically strong in time series data, has short training times and requires low memory, which is crucial given the dataset's properties. Compared to other models in the list, most have weaknesses that conflict significantly with either CPU requirements or low memory usage, or both.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Given the dataset properties, specifically the large data size and low memory requirements, VAE is selected because it can handle large datasets with relatively short training times, even though it generally requires high memory which may be managed with data batching. While VAE isn't perfect for low-memory environments, it is the best compromise available in terms of scalability and efficiency compared to other models. It is most efficient on GPUs but has capacity to work across large-scale time series datasets, which aligns more than others with the given dataset properties and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice given the dataset's properties. It supports scalable processing of large datasets and operates efficiently with CPU resources, which aligns with the requirement of low memory usage. Despite its weakness in handling time series data, it compensates with strengths in handling large datasets and a short training time. Additionally, LUNAR can manage low-signal data to a better extent compared to other models in the list, offering a balance between strengths and weaknesses suitable for the dataset characteristics presented.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Deep SVDD model is selected due to its scalability to large datasets and capability to handle high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics of being large. It also operates well with GPU, which is beneficial given the CPU and low memory constraints, helping manage resources efficiently. While it doesn't explicitly mention strengths in time series data, its general scalability and handling of complex data types like images and technology data suggest it could be adaptable. However, note it might require tuning due to its high dimensional focus.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it supports high dimensionality, sparse data, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties of handling a large time series dataset. Despite its low-memory weakness, it has strengths in high-dimensional data and short training time, which can be beneficial for managing the challenges of low-signal data. Although it's not explicitly designed for time series data, it is better suited for CPU and low memory requirements than other options in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Considering the dataset is large, is a time series, and is low-signal with a requirement for CPU and low memory usage, Deep SVDD is the most suitable option. It is scalable to large datasets, making it apt for a large data size, and while it is not explicitly strong for time series, it doesn't have specific weaknesses in this area compared to other models. Additionally, many models have weaknesses related to CPU preference or consume high memory, while Deep SVDD offers a more balanced choice without these particular drawbacks.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is chosen because it's scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset's large size. While it does not specifically excel in time series, its strengths in high dimensionality might help in handling complex patterns within low-signal data. Although it typically uses a GPU, it avoids some critical weaknesses present in other models, like poor scalability or incompatible with low memory. Additionally, it does not explicitly list CPU as a limitation, allowing some flexibility if GPU usage can be managed. None of the other models are well-suited for handling time series and low-signal data combined with CPU/low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties of being a large, time series data with low-signal and CPU and low memory constraints. While VAE's strengths don't explicitly mention time series, it is capable of handling high dimensionality which can be beneficial for time series analysis. It supports large datasets and has a short training time, aligning with CPU and low memory requirements. Although it has weaknesses with low-signal data, the absence of a perfect fit among the available models makes VAE the most balanced option with regard to the dataset constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is selected because it has the capability to handle large datasets with short training time, which is essential given the dataset's 'large' size. While SO-GAAL has a weakness with 'time series', it is less problematic compared to other models that either have 'low memory' as a weakness or do not handle CPU well. Other models with suitable capabilities for large datasets (such as AutoEncoder, AE1SVM, and ALAD) also have critical weaknesses like low memory, low-signal data, or CPU inefficiency. SO-GAAL strikes a balance by supporting CPU and requiring low memory, making it a more feasible choice given resource constraints, even with its limitation in handling time series data.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, contains time series data, is low-signal, and requires a model with low memory usage and compatibility with CPU. While AutoEncoder is not known for CPU compatibility, it excels in processing large datasets and handling noisy data efficiently, which compensates for low-signal data. Despite its disadvantage in CPU compatibility, it remains a better choice than other models given that alternatives like AnoGAN, DevNet, and ALAD explicitly have time series as a weakness, and others possess greater weaknesses in handling low-signal and CPU requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE has strengths such as handling large datasets, high dimensionality, scalability to large datasets, and short training time, which align well with the dataset's large size and characteristics. Although it has weaknesses in low-signal data and CPU requirements, it is the best fit among the given options, as other models such as DevNet, SO-GAAL, and ALAD have critical weaknesses in time series and low-signal data, making them unsuitable.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it can handle large datasets, which is crucial given the data size tag. Although it generally favors GPU scenarios, its scalability makes it a good fit for handling large datasets even on a CPU when memory is a constraint. Additionally, while it has weaknesses related to noisy data, it does not have critical weaknesses against time series data or low-signal data, unlike many other models in the list. This makes it a better fit relative to others given the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, aligning with the dataset tag 'large'. The model has CPU compatibility, which is essential given the 'CPU' and 'low memory' additional requirements. Although it shows weaknesses in time series data, the competing models also face significant challenges with either low memory or time series data. LUNAR's short training time and ability to handle large datasets make it a practical choice considering the constraints and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is selected because it is capable of handling large datasets and benefits from GPU acceleration, which suits time series data with large size requirements. Although it has a weakness in dealing with noisy data, the dataset is characterized by low-signal data, which may not be as detrimental as noise. Additionally, among the models available, Deep SVDD is more aligned with handling high-dimensional data structures typical in such problems while still being scalable for large datasets, even under CPU constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it is scalable to large datasets, which matches the 'large' data size tag. Despite it being generally more suited for GPU rather than CPU, its ability to handle high dimensionality and noisy data aligns well with the 'time series' and 'low-signal data' characteristics of the dataset. The primary weakness of the AutoEncoder is its performance on 'low-signal data' and 'CPU' setting, but given the need to select one model from the list, it aligns better overall compared to other models with more pronounced weaknesses regarding time series data or low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected as it is scalable to large datasets, which fits the 'large' data size requirement. Although it has weaknesses with low-signal data, like many other models on the list, it possesses short training time and can handle high dimensionality which may help in extracting useful features from the time series data. Additionally, it can manage noisy data which might help in dealing with the low-signal characteristic of the dataset. Even though AutoEncoder's weaknesses include 'CPU' usage and 'low-signal data', it surfaces as a reasonable choice given the limited matching strength options from the list.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AnoGAN\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is tagged as large and time series with low-signal data, requiring CPU and low memory consumption. While AnoGAN has weaknesses in low memory, it fits the requirement of handling large datasets, making it a scalable option. Other models either lack specific support for time series data or have significant weaknesses in handling low memory or CPU-based requirements. Despite its low memory weakness, AnoGAN's scalability to large datasets aligns well with the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is suitable for large time series datasets and can scale to large datasets while utilizing GPU, which aligns well with the dataset requirements. Although it has weaknesses regarding noisy data, it does not explicitly mention low memory or low-signal data as issues. Other models have more pronounced conflicts with the dataset's characteristics, such as low memory or explicit weaknesses with time series data.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is chosen because it is scalable to large datasets and leverages powerful GPUs to manage computational demands, fitting the dataset's large size and low memory constraint when using CPUs. Although it has weaknesses with noisy and imbalanced data, these are not significant concerns given the data's low-signal characteristic. While not explicitly designed for low-signal time series data, Deep SVDD offers manageable trade-offs compared to other models on these aspects.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it is capable of handling large datasets and is scalable across them, which matches the dataset's large size. Although it's not a strength for CPU or low memory environments, it is the most balanced model considering that other models have significant weaknesses for low-signal data or time series, which this dataset requires handling. Despite its weakness with low-signal data, its general suitability for large datasets without the need for real-time data processing makes it the best potential fit from the list available.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for high dimensionality and scalable datasets, which aligns with the large size of the time series data. While time series itself is not a strength, compared to other models in the list, AE1SVM's capabilities in handling high dimensionality and large data make it a more practical choice. Its weakness of CPU preference aligns with the dataset's requirement for low memory usage better than other models considering memory constraints. Additionally, given that low-signal data is not a specific weakness listed for AE1SVM, it makes a stronger case than models with explicit weaknesses for time series or low-signal contexts.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large and time series based, with low-signal data and a requirement for CPU and low memory usage. Deep SVDD is scalable to large datasets and doesn't have explicit weaknesses related to CPU usage or low memory, making it a more viable option among the choices provided. Though it is not specifically strong in handling time series or low-signal data, it avoids severe memory or CPU constraints compared to other models in the list, aligning relatively better with the dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable as it can handle large datasets and has low memory requirements, which aligns with the dataset's tag for 'CPU' and 'low memory'. Although it has a weakness for time series data, its overall scalability, short training time, and ability to handle sparse and imbalanced data make it a reasonable choice given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large with time series data and requires a model suitable for low-signal data and low memory usage on a CPU. Among the given models, the AutoEncoder has strengths in handling large datasets, high dimensionality, and has short training time which aligns well with the large data size. Although it is noted for GPU and high memory usage typically, it does not have explicitly stated weaknesses for time series data, unlike most other models listed, making it the best available option considering the constraints and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected due to its capability to handle large datasets and its efficiency with high dimensionality data, which is crucial for the given large time series dataset. Although it has weaknesses in handling low-signal data and CPU-based operations, it provides a scalable solution with short training time and noise handling, which offsets the low-signal limitation. Despite its high memory usage, it aligns better with the dataset requirements compared to the other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is selected because it aligns well with several key requirements for this dataset. It operates effectively on large datasets and is scalable, meeting the 'large' data size criterion. While SO-GAAL is not specifically strong in time series, it does handle imbalanced and high dimensionality datasets, which might be encountered in the 'low-signal data' characteristic. It also has a short training time, which is beneficial for CPU and low memory environments. Despite some weaknesses, such as being limited for time series data, it is the best fit compared to other models that have even more pronounced disadvantages under these constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is chosen because it is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset's large size requirement. While it is not specifically designed for time series data, it does not have significant weaknesses in handling time series, unlike most other models. Although Deep SVDD can require high memory, it is manageable as memory is not the primary constraint compared to scalability. Its ability to handle high dimensionality and suitability for GPU also align well with large dataset processing, making it a feasible choice given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large and requires low memory use on CPU with a time series data type and low-signal characteristics. While AutoEncoder has a weakness related to low-signal data as well as CPU use, it is capable of handling large datasets and short training time. Among the available options, AutoEncoder is the most suitable since it can process large datasets efficiently, even though it typically requires GPU. Other models have more direct weaknesses regarding time series or low-signal data, making them less viable choices.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a large time series with low-signal data, which means it requires a model that can handle such characteristics while operating with low memory and CPU. Most models listed are not designed for time series or are not optimized for low-signal data. LUNAR, despite its weaknesses in time series, is the only model that mentions scalability to large datasets on GPU and short training time, fitting the constraint on processing large datasets. It can potentially handle low-signal data better compared to other models with more severe time series weaknesses, such as DevNet and ALAD.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: DevNet\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Despite its weaknesses with time series and low-signal data, DevNet is chosen due to its strengths in handling large datasets, short training time, and scalability. The focus on CPU and low memory requirements highlights the model's ability to be optimized without requiring GPU, which suits the constraints of the dataset. Although not the ideal fit for time series, no model in the list perfectly matches the dataset characteristics, and DevNet's scalable nature and short training time make it a reasonable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large and consists of time series data with low signal, requiring a model that can manage scalability and handle low-signal data. Given the options, Deep SVDD is scalable to large datasets, which addresses the data size. While it does not explicitly support time series, it is better suited compared to others that have notable weaknesses with time series and CPU requirements. Deep SVDD's scalability, despite its sensitivity to noisy data, makes it the most suitable available model from the list for processing large datasets effectively within given constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Deep SVDD model is selected because it is scalable to large datasets, which fits the large data size tag. Although it requires a GPU, it handles high dimensionality effectively, making it suitable for other time series tasks even though it doesn't explicitly mention time series as a strength. It also bypasses the 'low memory' weakness prevalent in other models. Despite its challenges with noisy data, it fits all other expectations better than other models, given its scalable nature and focus on large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is a suitable choice considering the dataset's large size and time series nature. While it doesn't explicitly have time series as a strength, it possesses scalability to large datasets. Other models have weaknesses in time series or low-signal data, whereas Deep SVDD does not explicitly cite these as weaknesses. It also fits the CPU requirement better than other GPU-intensive models, making it a balanced choice given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it is scalable to large datasets, which matches the 'large' data size requirement. Although it requires high memory, it has a short training time which offsets some of its memory demands, and low memory efficiency is a common issue among many models provided. Its ability to handle high dimensionality and large datasets makes it suitable for the time series data type. Despite the CPU requirement, VAE offers a better balance for the dataset's needs compared to other models, since autoencoders generally perform well with time series. While it is weak with low-signal data, it offers versatility that the alternatives do not, given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is chosen for its strengths in handling large datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. It also has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Although it has a weakness in dealing with low-signal data, the other available models have more significant weaknesses such as lacking support for time series datasets and requiring high memory or GPU, which contradicts the dataset's additional requirements for CPU and low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is chosen because it can handle large datasets and works well with time series, despite not being explicitly focused on it. It efficiently handles high-dimensional data with its scalability and short training time on large datasets. Although AutoEncoder is weaker with low-signal data, the need for CPU and low memory are constraints, its strengths in handling noisy and high-dimensional data make it more suitable compared to other options in the list. Most of the other models have significant weaknesses concerning time series data. AutoEncoder also has scalability, a short training time, and the capability to run on a GPU, making it practical for large time series datasets under typical computational limitations.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's large size. Although it typically requires a GPU and high memory, it can handle low memory constraints to some extent and has short training times which reduce memory consumption. Despite its weakness in CPU operations, it best fits the constraints given compared to other models which have more critical weaknesses for time series and low signal data attributes.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset under consideration is large and time series based with characteristics indicating low signal data, and there is a requirement for a model that can efficiently run on CPU with low memory usage. While none of the models completely align with all dataset requirements, Deep SVDD is known for handling high-dimensional data types and scales efficiently with large datasets. Despite its weak point with low signal data, its strengths in scalable dataset management align with the requirement for low computational overhead on larger datasets better than other options in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is scalable to large datasets and operates efficiently with short training times, which is crucial given the dataset's large size and CPU requirement. Even though LUNAR has weaknesses concerning time series data, the other models have more significant drawbacks for this specific dataset. LUNAR does not suffer from low memory issues and can handle imbalanced and sparse data, which may be beneficial for low-signal characteristics. Other models, such as VAE and AutoEncoder, primarily operate with GPUs and potentially high memory, which does not align well with the low memory and CPU requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Given the dataset's large size, time series nature, and additional requirements for CPU and low memory, the selection was challenging due to the constraints and weaknesses in the models provided. However, LUNAR has strengths in handling large datasets, despite its weakness in time series data. It is scalable, has a short training time, and operates well within the GPU paradigm. While not optimal in handling time series directly, it was chosen for its scalability and low computational requirements, fitting the need for large dataset handling within low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Given the dataset characteristics of a large time series dataset with low memory requirements and CPU usage, Deep SVDD is the most suitable choice. Although it explicitly states a weakness in handling noisy data and potentially high memory, its scalability to large datasets, utilization of GPU, and strengths in domains like healthcare and technology align more closely with the requirements than the other models. Other models have specific weaknesses related to low-signal data or time series, making Deep SVDD a potentially more viable option despite its limitations.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it is capable of handling large datasets and has strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite having weaknesses in low memory, the strength in scalability and short training time makes it a more suitable choice for a large time series dataset with low-signal data, considering the limitations of other models regarding weaknesses with time series or low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is chosen primarily because it is scalable to large datasets, which matches the 'large' data size requirement in the dataset tags. Although it has weaknesses with time series data (which is part of this dataset's characteristics), the model's scalability and capability of handling sparse and imbalanced data, along with short training time, make it a viable option when prioritizing CPU and low memory capabilities. Other models either have significant drawbacks with low memory or require GPU, neither of which align well with the additional requirements. LUNAR's computational efficiency and scalability make it the most balanced choice given the dataset constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is chosen because it is capable of handling high dimensionality and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags indicating a large dataset. Despite its requirement for high memory, it is the most compatible with CPU usage compared to other options like AutoEncoder or VAE that lean towards GPU and high memory use. Although it has a weakness towards noisy data, the low-signal nature of the provided dataset was a constraint across most models, making the scalability and dimensionality support of Deep SVDD the deciding factor.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is suitable for large datasets which is a key requirement, and it is scalable to large datasets. Although it requires GPU and high memory, it has a relatively short training time and can handle noisy data. Despite its weakness with CPU requirements, it remains the best match given the alternatives which either suffer from greater incompatibility with time series data or have more significant weaknesses related to low-signal data or memory constraints. While no model perfectly aligns with all dataset tags, VAE offers the most balanced trade-off.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: shuttle\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"large\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"technology\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"noisy data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\", \"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets, like the one described in the dataset tags, and it effectively handles noisy data, which is a characteristic of this dataset. While it prefers a GPU, it can still function with CPU, although not optimally. It also supports scalable processing necessary for large datasets and provides short training times, which aligns with the additional requirements for CPU and low memory usage to some extent.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets with noisy data, which matches the dataset characteristics provided. It is scalable to large datasets and has strengths in both technology domains and handling high dimensionality. While it typically requires GPU and high memory, it effectively addresses the noisy data aspect of the dataset and does not have significant weaknesses related to tabular data or large datasets. Other models either have weaknesses with tabular data or do not handle noisy data well, making AutoEncoder the most balanced choice given the requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is highly suitable for this dataset as it handles tabular data well, is known for managing noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets. While it does typically leverage a GPU, it aligns well with the requirements for high dimensional and noisy data analysis in the technology domain. Despite the CPU and low memory preference, its strengths in managing large, noisy tabular datasets make it the best fit from the available choices.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset involves large, tabular, noisy data in the technology domain, having constraints of CPU usage and low memory. Among the available models, AutoEncoder effectively handles large datasets, tabular data, and noisy data with short training time and scalability, which aligns well with the dataset properties. While it typically requires high memory and GPU, its strengths in managing large, noisy tabular data under technology are more aligned with the dataset's characteristics than other models. Other models either do not support tabular data adequately or have shortcomings in handling noisy data or are not suitable for low memory/cpu constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is best suited for this dataset because it handles tabular technology data well, is robust to noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets. Although it has high memory requirements, the dataset's additional requirement for low memory is a limiting factor for many potential models, but AutoEncoder's ability to run on GPUs and its short training time help mitigate these issues compared to other models with longer training times or resource constraints. Furthermore, while it typically uses GPUs, its other strengths align well with the dataset's characteristics, making it a practical choice given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is a suitable choice due to its strengths in handling large, tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Despite its typical preference for GPUs over CPUs, it is scalable to large datasets, which is beneficial given the large data size. Although it generally requires high memory, the capability for efficient memory usage through proper data preprocessing and model optimization could potentially mitigate this weakness. Other models like VAE and ALAD have notable strengths, but AutoEncoder's specific strengths in tabular data, noise handling, and scalability make it a more balanced choice.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is a suitable choice for handling large, noisy tabular data in the technology domain. It is capable of working well with high dimensional data and is efficient with noisy datasets. Although it is mentioned that AutoEncoder typically requires high memory and a GPU for optimal performance, its ability to efficiently process large datasets and handle noisy data aligns with the dataset properties. Additionally, it has a short training time which further supports its feasibility given the CPU and low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for large-scale, tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics provided. It can handle high dimensionality and is scalable to large datasets, which is essential given the large data size. Additionally, AutoEncoder supports noisy data and has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory constraint. Although it prefers GPU over CPU, its strengths in handling the presented dataset characteristics outweigh this weakness compared to other models on the list.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it performs well with large tabular datasets and can handle noisy data effectively, which is a crucial requirement here. It also has short training times and is scalable to large datasets, fitting well within the constraints of CPU use and low memory. Despite its weakness on CPUs, AutoEncoder remains the best fit among the available options given its strengths align well with the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for large tabular datasets with noisy data as mentioned in the dataset tags. It has strengths in handling technology domain data with high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's properties. Although it requires GPU for optimal performance, its strengths outweigh the weaknesses compared to other models in the list, especially under the constraints of low memory usage in a CPU environment.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the dataset as it handles large tabular datasets effectively and is capable of dealing with noisy data, which is a key requirement here. Its strengths in technology domain, high dimensionality, and scalability to large datasets align well with the dataset characteristics. Moreover, it features a short training time which can be beneficial given the low memory and CPU constraints. Although it requires a GPU and high memory, it still addresses the core dataset needs more comprehensively than other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset, as it supports tabular data and is capable of handling noisy data effectively. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which aligns with the requirement for a model that can handle the data size and characteristics efficiently. Although the AutoEncoder may require GPU and high memory, these are trade-offs for its strengths in dealing with large, noisy datasets in a technological domain.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it excels in handling large tabular datasets with noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. It is suited for technology domain data and is scalable to large datasets. While it generally requires high memory, it can manage the large data size and noisy characteristics effectively, addressing the dataset's needs within the constraints that prefer CPU usage. Furthermore, AutoEncoder offers a short training time, which aligns well with the requirement for handling noisy data efficiently.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is suitable for the provided dataset properties as it handles large tabular datasets effectively, works well with noisy data, and is known for its scalability to large datasets. Despite its preference for GPU, it has a short training time and does not specifically mention a requirement for high memory, making it a feasible option for a low memory setup. Furthermore, its general applicability to technology domains aligns well with the dataset's domain tag.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable for handling the requirements of large, tabular datasets with noisy data. It is designed to work well with technology domains, and it supports high dimensionality. Although its strengths are optimized for GPU, it also presents short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it compatible with the CPU and low memory characteristics needed. Despite its weakness in CPU performance, it matches most of the dataset requirements better than the other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected due to its strengths in handling tabular data and large datasets, both of which are key properties of the given dataset. Additionally, it is capable of working with noisy data and technology-related domains, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics. Though it generally requires high memory and GPUs, it offers short training times, which can be advantageous in computationally constrained environments. Its CPU-related weaknesses are noted but outweighed by its overall alignment with the dataset needs.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and handles noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets, has short training time, and supports GPU, making it efficient despite the no CPU requirement. While it requires high memory, this is less of a concern compared to ensuring compatibility with noisy data and large size. Other models either have more significant weaknesses with noisy data (Deep SVDD, LUNAR) or are not optimal for tabular data (AnoGAN, SO-GAAL), or require resources unsuitable given the dataset (e.g., CPU with VAE).\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is chosen because it aligns well with the dataset characteristics and requirements. It supports tabular data, technology domain, and is effective with noisy data. It can handle large datasets efficiently and has a short training time. While it typically requires high memory, it outperforms other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, SO-GAAL, and Deep SVDD which have significant weaknesses such as inability to handle tabular data, noisy data, or low memory compatibility. The AutoEncoder offers a practical balance considering the constraints, especially given that it can be computationally adjusted to work within CPU and memory limitations.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it effectively handles tabular data and scales to large datasets, both of which align with the dataset properties. Furthermore, it performs well with noisy data, a critical characteristic of the dataset. While it primarily leverages GPU, which may not fully align with the CPU requirement, it supports low memory usage and offers a short training time, providing a good balance for the given constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it is strong with tabular data, handles large datasets well, is effective in processing noisy data, and is associated with a short training time. While it typically utilizes a GPU, its capability to handle large-scale data and noisy environments makes it apt for technology sector datasets. It does not explicitly have a CPU or low memory preference, but given the constraints, its overall strengths align well with the dataset's needs, compared to other models that either lack scalability to large datasets or are less suited to noisy tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling large tabular data, especially within the technology domain. It is capable of dealing with noisy data and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset tags. Despite its requirement for high memory, it provides a short training time and aligns well with the model requirement for GPU compatibility rather than CPU. Among the models available in the list, AutoEncoder strikes the best balance between managing noisiness and scaling with large data, making it the most suitable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is most suitable considering the dataset properties and model characteristics. It is adept at handling tabular and noisy data, as well as technology domain applications, which aligns with the dataset's type and characteristics. Despite its GPU preference and sometimes high memory need, VAE is capable of handling large datasets efficiently with a short training time. The model's weakness in CPU handling is opposite of the dataset's additional requirement, but given the overall suitability to the dataset's tags, it stands out as the best choice from the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the best choice given the dataset properties. It is well-suited for large tabular datasets in the technology domain and is capable of handling noisy data effectively, a key characteristic of the dataset. Although it has a weakness with respect to CPU requirements, its strength in adapting to high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets makes it suitable for the given data size and additional requirements. Moreover, it has a short training time which aligns well with operational efficiency.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, consists of tabular data, is noisy, and requires compatibility with low memory and CPU resources. The AutoEncoder excels with large datasets, handles tabular and noisy data well, and offers short training times, making it suitable for low memory situations. Although a weakness listed is CPU usage, it still addresses more dataset requirements compared to other models in the list. Its ability to scale and handle high dimensional data is also advantageous for technology domain data.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. It supports high-dimensionality data and is scalable to large datasets while offering a short training time. Despite requiring high memory and typically utilizing GPU, it can handle the given dataset requirements better than other models. The limitations concerning CPU are a common challenge, but its ability to manage noisy data is crucial given the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is suitable for handling large tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It leverages GPU for efficient processing and maintains short training times, making it feasible with low memory constraints. Despite its weakness in CPU needs, its ability to scale to large datasets and manage noisy data makes it the best fit compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is suitable as it can handle tabular data and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is scalable to large datasets and performs well with high-dimensionality, which aligns with the need for scalability and the dataset size. Although AutoEncoder typically requires high memory, the dataset's focus on CPU and low memory are not critical limitations since the strengths of handling large, noisy, tabular data outweigh these concerns, making it the best fit among available options.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset consists of large tabular data with noisy characteristics and requires models that can run on CPU with low memory. While AutoEncoders typically leverage GPUs and high memory, their ability to handle large datasets and noisy data makes them more suitable given the constraints. They have strengths in tabular data and technology domains, aligning well with the dataset properties, and offer short training times, which is advantageous in CPU environments.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the best choice for this large tabular dataset in the technology domain with noisy data, as it is scalable to large datasets and has strengths in handling noisy data and tabular formats. While it has a high memory usage and GPU preference, it offers a short training time which is advantageous given the CPU and low memory additional requirements. Other models either do not handle tabular data well, are not suitable for noisy data, or have extended weaknesses like long training times that may not align with low memory availability.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is most suitable for the dataset properties as it supports tabular data and is capable of handling noisy data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It also performs well with large datasets and is scalable. While it may require GPU and high memory, it fulfills the requirement for large data size management. Among all the models in the list, the AutoEncoder aligns the best considering both its strengths and the dataset's needs, even if the 'low memory' requirement is not perfectly aligned, it is a reasonable trade-off given other strengths.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and handles large datasets effectively, both of which align with the dataset properties. It is capable of working with noisy data, a key characteristic of the dataset. While VAE typically benefits from GPU acceleration, it is also scalable to large datasets, which is necessary given the dataset's size. Despite its weakness in CPU usage, it aligns better than other models with most dataset requirements, such as handling noisy data and large-scale tabular data in the technology domain.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is best suited for this scenario due to its strengths in handling large, noisy tabular datasets, which matches the dataset tags provided. It is also scalable to large datasets, and despite its general preference for GPUs, its capability with CPU and short training times make it a suitable choice. Other models like VAE and ALAD also have strengths in these areas, but the AutoEncoder is less compromised by low memory and CPU constraints compared to others.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets with noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. While other models like VAE also fit these criteria, the AutoEncoder does not have 'CPU' as a weakness, making it more suitable given the requirement for low memory usage. Additionally, it supports scalability to large datasets and has short training times, which are important considerations for the given dataset constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it supports tabular data and efficiently handles noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which is suitable given the data size. Despite the CPU and low memory requirements as weaknesses, its strengths make it a suitable choice for large tabular datasets with noise in the technology domain.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for handling large tabular datasets in the technology domain with inherent noisy data characteristics. It is optimized for large datasets and achieves a short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory requirement constraint. Although it tends to leverage GPU for better performance, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data make it the most appropriate choice for this particular dataset among the given options.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets in the technology domain, particularly when dealing with noisy data. It is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time. While it has a weakness related to CPU usage and low memory, it is arguably the most compatible choice among the options, as other models have more significant weaknesses concerning the specific dataset requirements such as handling tabular data or noisy data effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice because it is specifically strong with tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's tag for data type. It is capable of handling noisy data, which is another key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets which is essential given the data size. While the model uses high memory and GPU, it offers a short training time, which is beneficial despite the CPU and low memory requirements. Considering the trade-offs and the need to process large, noisy tabular datasets effectively, AutoEncoder balances scalability with performance better than other models in the context provided.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large-sized, tabular, technology-related, and noisy, with a requirement for low memory and CPU utilization. Among the models, 'AutoEncoder' handles tabular data, technology, and noisy data well. While it requires high memory and prefers GPU, it can have a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which are critical requirements given the dataset's properties. Although CPU adaptability is a weakness, other model options either do not support tabular data well or have significant weaknesses with large datasets or noisy data, making 'AutoEncoder' the best compromise for the given constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable as it supports both tabular and technology domains, handles noisy data well, and is scalable to large datasets. Although it generally requires high memory, it has a short training time and can work with GPU, making it a good fit given the dataset size and characteristics. While it prefers GPU, it can be efficient on CPU with careful management of hyperparameters. Moreover, VAE specifically mentions compatibility with tabular data which matches the dataset's data type.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is tabular, large in size, and contains noisy data with a requirement for low memory and CPU usage. AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data handling and can manage noisy data effectively. It has strengths in scenarios involving high dimensionality and technology domains, which aligns with the dataset properties. Although it generally requires high memory, it still remains the best choice given the alternative models are either less suitable for noisy data or have more severe weaknesses in handling tabular data under the given constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is suitable as it supports tabular data and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset properties. It is scalable to large datasets, which is important for this large dataset. While it prefers GPU and high memory, it still offers a short training time and can handle high dimensionality, making it a robust choice given the constraints of CPU and low memory.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice because it supports tabular data and is designed to handle noisy data effectively. It is scalable to large datasets, which is crucial given the data size, and offers short training times, aligning well with low resource availability (CPU, low memory) in the dataset properties. While GPU and high memory are strengths, the model's ability to handle noisy, large-scale tabular data without being limited by CPU requirements makes it the best option given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is efficient on large datasets and can be used effectively with high memory, which aligns well with the dataset's large size and technology domain. Although AutoEncoder typically benefits from GPU acceleration, it is scalable to large datasets without requiring a GPU, making it potentially adaptable to CPU usage with limited memory considerations.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected as the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling tabular data and large datasets. It is also efficient with high-dimensionality data, which fits the use case in the technology domain. Furthermore, it copes well with noisy data, a key characteristic of this dataset. Although AutoEncoder typically requires high memory and prefers a GPU, its capability to scale to large datasets and handle noisy data makes it a better fit compared to other models listed. Additionally, its short training time suits situations with limited computational resources.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset properties, which include large tabular data typically found in the technology domain that can be noisy. It handles noisy data well and is scalable to large datasets, aligning with the dataset size and noisy data characteristics. While it typically requires GPU for optimal performance due to its memory demands, it has a short training time. None of the other models meet the criteria of handling large tabular noisy data on a CPU with low memory better than AutoEncoder.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the given dataset properties because it efficiently handles tabular data with noise, which matches the dataset's characteristics of being large and noisy. It also has a strength in scalability to large datasets and can manage the data type (tabular) effectively. Despite its weakness of requiring high memory, it provides a good balance between short training time and the ability to manage noisy data. Considering the constraints related to CPU and low memory, while not ideal for AutoEncoder, it still provides an optimal fit among the given options.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it supports tabular data and is capable of handling large datasets efficiently, which aligns with the dataset's tag of 'large' data size in the 'technology' domain. Additionally, AutoEncoder is strong in dealing with noisy data, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Although it has a weakness of requiring high memory (compared to the dataset's 'low memory' tag), its short training time and scalability to large datasets help mitigate this concern. It also effectively utilizes GPUs, which can be used to optimize performance within the CPU constraints if required.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the best choice as it supports tabular data, handles noisy data effectively, and scales well to large datasets, which are key requirements given the dataset properties. Additionally, AutoEncoder also benefits from having a short training time, which aligns well with the preference for low memory usage on CPU. Despite minor weaknesses with CPU, it is the most aligned model available with respect to strengths needed for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is suitable for handling large tabular datasets common in technology domains. It is adept at dealing with noisy data and is scalable to large datasets, which is required for the large dataset size. While it prefers GPU, its short training time is advantageous for CPU environments. The weaknesses related to real-time data and low-signal data are not a concern given the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it handles tabular data and noisy data well, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It is scalable to large datasets, which matches the 'large' data size tag. Despite its high memory requirement, its short training time and adaptability to noisy data make it the most suitable choice given the additional requirement of using CPU and low memory constraints. While not ideal for low memory, it is the best fit among the options, given the need for handling noisy data and scalability.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: letter\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"data_size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"data_type\": [\"images\"],\n", + " \"domain\": [\"education\"],\n", + " \"characteristics\": [],\n", + " \"additional_requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a medium-sized image dataset from the education domain with a low memory requirement. VAE is well-suited for image data and can handle medium to large datasets efficiently. It also supports GPU acceleration and has a short training time, which is beneficial. While VAE typically requires high memory, it does not have a specific weakness for low memory, making it a reasonable compromise given the options. Overall, VAE's strengths in handling image data and educational domain alignment make it the most suitable choice from the given model list.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is best suited for this dataset because it excels with image data, which aligns with the dataset type tag. It also performs well on medium-sized datasets with high dimensionality that may contain noisy data, a common characteristic of image data. Although it is not tailored specifically for low memory environments, none of the models are strong in this aspect. Additionally, the AutoEncoder offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which can be advantageous as the dataset grows. This makes it the most suitable choice given the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for processing medium-sized image datasets, particularly in the educational domain. It is designed to handle images and high dimensionality effectively, and it provides a short training time which meets the requirement for low memory usage as it does not explicitly list low memory as a major weakness, unlike several other models. Additionally, VAE's capability to work with noisy data aligns well with potential challenges in handling image datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it supports image data with high dimensionality and is applicable in the education domain. It is well-suited for medium-sized datasets and offers short training times. Although it typically uses high memory, it is adaptable for image data, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics while offering high scalability, making it a viable option, despite not perfectly meeting the low memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected as it is strong in handling image data ('images') which matches the dataset's data type. It is also applicable in the domain of 'education' as per its strengths. VAE can manage high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, which can be beneficial for image datasets. Although it requires high memory, which contradicts the dataset's low memory requirement, its advantages in handling images and its compatibility with educational contexts outweigh this singular mismatch, especially considering other models have more severe weaknesses or lesser relevancy to the data tags.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling images, a medium dataset size, and its domain applicability in education. It supports high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns with typical characteristics of image datasets. Although VAE requires high memory, it offers a short training time, making it suitable for efficient processing within memory constraints when optimized appropriately. Additionally, it's scalable to large datasets if needed, which is a plus for medium-sized datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and requirements. VAE is strong in handling images, which is critical for this medium-sized image dataset, and it aligns well with the educational domain. Although it has high memory requirements, it has a short training time, which is beneficial for efficient processing. Other models either have weaknesses in handling image data, require high memory with long training times, or are not suitable for concerns such as dataset size or model scalability. VAE stands out by balancing its strengths effectively for the provided criteria.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is selected because it effectively handles images and is suitable for educational use cases. It thrives with high-dimensional data, which is common in image datasets. While it does not explicitly list low memory usage as a strength, its short training time compensates for this, and it scales well to medium-sized datasets, aligning with the dataset's 'medium' size tag. Moreover, the VAE addresses some noise in the data, which is a potential characteristic of educational datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable for the given dataset as it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. The dataset involves medium-sized images from the education domain, requiring low memory usage. VAE is strong in handling images, especially in educational contexts, due to its capabilities in processing high-dimensional data efficiently. Although VAE typically requires high memory, its short training time is advantageous for maintaining low memory consumption overall. Furthermore, the VAE's ability to handle noisy data is beneficial for real-world educational datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for image datasets, particularly in the education domain, with strengths that align well with the dataset properties. It handles high dimensionality and noisy data efficiently, which is often encountered in image datasets. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. While VAE has high memory requirements, it does not have low memory as a core weakness, making it more adaptable than other models like AnoGAN or MO-GAAL, which have low memory listed as a weakness. Overall, VAE's strengths match the dataset's characteristics and additional requirements best compared to the other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for the given dataset as it aligns well with the strengths needed for a medium-sized image dataset in the education domain. It efficiently handles high-dimensional and noisy data, is designed for image data, and operates effectively with GPUs. Despite requiring high memory, which contradicts the low memory requirement, it offers short training time and can work with large datasets, making it a practical choice given the other strengths it brings to the task.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is chosen due to its strengths in handling images, which aligns with the dataset type. It is also suitable for educational applications, stated as one of its strengths. Despite the dataset's requirement for low memory usage, which is a weakness for VAE, other models with similar strengths do not adequately meet the data size and type criteria or have other critical weaknesses. VAE's short training time is an added advantage for mid-sized datasets, which suggests it can be feasible within memory constraints if properly optimized.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it excels with image data, a key aspect of the dataset, and is applicable in the education domain. It supports medium data size and has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which might be relevant to this dataset. Although VAE requires high memory, it is one of the only models that suits image data from the model list and doesn't have 'low memory' as a key weakness. Additionally, VAE offers short training times, which is advantageous given the need for efficiency in educational applications.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model given the dataset characteristics. It is strong with image data, which matches the dataset type. Additionally, VAE is suitable for the education domain, as indicated in its strengths. While it does use high memory, it has a short training time and can handle large datasets well, aligning with the dataset's medium size. It also effectively manages high dimensionality and noisy data. Although it might not meet the low memory requirement perfectly, none of the other models handle the dataset properties as effectively as VAE, given the available model list.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for handling image data, which is a primary requirement of the dataset. It has strengths in education domains and can handle high dimensionality and noisy data, aligning closely with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which benefits a medium-sized dataset with low memory constraints. Although it requires high memory, its ability to work well with image data and the educational domain makes it the best choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it handles image data well and has relevant strengths in education, high dimensionality, and noisy data, aligning with the dataset's requirements. While it requires high memory, VAE has a short training time and can manage medium-sized datasets efficiently, making it a suitable choice amidst the models provided.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is related to images in the education domain, with a medium size and low memory requirements. Among the models, VAE has strengths in handling images, particularly in education and high-dimensional data, and it can cope with noisy data. Moreover, it offers short training times, which can be beneficial given the medium data size. Although it generally requires high memory, it balances this with significant strengths in the image domain, making it a more suitable choice than models with stronger memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for handling image data, which matches the dataset type. It also has strengths in dealing with high-dimensionality, noisy data and is applicable in educational contexts. Although it requires high memory, VAE's ability to operate with large datasets aligns with the medium data size specified. Importantly, it provides short training times, which helps mitigate memory demands in scenarios where low memory is a requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized image datasets, which align with the dataset characteristics. It is strong in handling images, educational domain applications, and is efficient with short training times. It also supports high dimensionality, which is typical in image data, without being adversely affected by the model's weaknesses. Although it does require high memory, it doesn't specifically list low memory as a weakness, unlike several other models, making it a viable choice given the dataset's requirement of low memory accommodations. Overall, VAE's strengths closely match the dataset needs more than the other models listed.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for image data within the education domain, which is supported by its strengths in handling high-dimensionality and noisy data typical of images. While it requires high memory, which is generally a weakness, it compensates with short training times and scalability to large datasets. Its specific use case in education and image processing aligns well, and other models either have weaknesses in image processing or limited scalability.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the dataset properties, which include medium-sized image data for the education domain with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE has strengths in handling images, supports high dimensionality, can work efficiently with noisy data, and has short training times suitable for large datasets. Although VAE requires high memory, its compatibility with images and education data, along with its fast processing, outweigh the weaknesses of memory usage given that other models have limitations either in handling images or memory efficiency.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for medium-sized image data and is capable of handling high-dimensional datasets, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also supports GPU acceleration and has a short training time, making it efficient in terms of computational resources. Although it has weaknesses such as imbalanced data handling, there is no indication in the dataset tags that this is a concern. The need for low memory usage could be a consideration, but among the options, AutoEncoder seems to be the best fit for the given dataset's domain (education) and data type (images).\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is suitable for medium-sized image datasets, fits well within the education domain, and performs efficiently with noisy data. It can handle high dimensionality and benefits from GPU resources. Although it typically requires high memory, it offers short training times, which partly aligns with the 'low memory' requirement by reducing computation time. Compared to other models, VAE has strengths that align well with the provided dataset properties, and its weaknesses are less relevant to the stated requirements (e.g., it does not heavily rely on CPU or involve real-time data, which were not part of the dataset tags).\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the dataset because it supports images and the education domain, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It is designed to handle medium-sized datasets with high dimensionality and has strengths in image data. Additionally, the VAE model provides short training time and is scalable to large datasets, accommodating the 'medium' data size requirement. Although it has high memory usage, it does not have a critical weakness in low memory settings, making it a more suitable choice compared to models with clear low memory weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is chosen because it is highly suitable for image data, which aligns with the data_type tag of the dataset. Additionally, it is optimized for medium-sized datasets in domains like education. While it requires higher memory, it meets the low training time requirement and can handle high dimensionality and noisy data effectively. Despite the low memory requirement in additional needs, its compatibility with the dataset's characteristics—images and education—makes it the most balanced choice compared to other models that might struggle with low memory performance or are not ideal for image data.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is most suitable for the given dataset because it has strengths in handling image data, is relevant to the education domain, and can manage high dimensionality and noisy data. While it requires high memory, which conflicts with the low memory requirement, other choices like AnoGAN or AE1SVM have more significant drawbacks aligned with the dataset's tags. VAE also offers short training time and scalability, which are beneficial for medium-sized datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for images and fits within the education domain, which matches the dataset characteristics. Despite its weakness of requiring high memory, it is capable of handling noisy data and high dimensionality, which might be beneficial depending on the dataset features. Additionally, it has a short training time and scalability to large datasets. Although it is not the perfect fit in terms of low memory requirement, it offers the best trade-off considering other strengths aligned with the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this medium-sized image dataset in the education domain with low memory requirements. VAE has strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It also offers short training times and is suitable for large datasets, although it requires careful memory management. Other models with image support, like AnoGAN and AE1SVM, have significant weaknesses in low memory settings or longer training times, making them less ideal. Overall, VAE strikes a balance with its short training time and ability to handle high dimensionality, making it the best fit within the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable as it excels in handling image data and is relevant in the education domain. It supports high dimensionality and large datasets, which aligns with the given data size. Although it requires high memory, it compensates with a short training time, making it a more memory-efficient choice compared to other models. Moreover, the additional strengths in handling noisy data and compatibility with educational content make it a preferable choice amongst the models that struggle with image data or have prolonged training times.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable because it effectively handles image data, which is the type of data present in the dataset. It is also applicable in the education domain, which aligns with the dataset tags. Although the dataset requires low memory, which is a weakness of VAE, VAE's strengths in handling high dimensionality, short training time, and compatibility with large datasets outweigh this weakness. It also effectively processes noisy data, which is a typical characteristic of educational datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for medium-sized image datasets and has specific strengths in the education domain, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It supports images, operates efficiently in high dimensionality, and is designed to handle noisy data. While VAE requires high memory, it does not specifically list low memory as a weakness, unlike some other models. It also features a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it suitable given the provided requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for image data, which is the data type of the dataset. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which are common in image datasets. It is also relevant to the education domain, matching one of the dataset tags. Additionally, the model has a short training time and scalability to large datasets, which are beneficial given the medium data size. While the model is high memory, the competing models have other specific weaknesses such as suitability for low memory applications, which aligns with the additional requirements of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is most suitable because it is strong in handling image data, which matches the data type specified in the dataset tags. Additionally, VAE is applicable in the education domain and can efficiently deal with medium-sized datasets, leveraging its short training time and ability to work with high dimensionality. While VAE is generally high in memory usage, it provides support for GPU, balancing the considerations of memory requirements and scalability within the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized image datasets, particularly in the education domain. It is well-suited to handle high-dimensional image data, operates efficiently on GPUs, and offers a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's need for low memory usage. While it does require high memory, its strengths in dealing with images, specifically in the education domain, make it more appropriate compared to other models in the list. Despite the dataset's low memory requirement, none of the models perfectly covers all aspects, but VAE provides the best overall fit for the given context.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized image datasets in the education domain, as it is strong in handling image data and is applicable to education. It supports high dimensionality and noisy data, which is essential for image recognition. Despite requiring high memory, VAE is compatible with GPU and offers short training times, making it a relatively efficient option given the low memory requirement constraint. It does not have significant weaknesses for this use case, unlike other models that struggle with images or have worse memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized image datasets in the education domain. It has strengths in handling images, is associated with the education domain, supports high dimensionality, and is efficient on GPUs. It provides short training times which is important due to the requirement for low memory usage. Although it does not explicitly mention 'low memory' as a strength, it manages well with high memory efficiency and large datasets, which can contribute to optimized usage in a medium-sized dataset context.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, focused on images within the education domain, and has a low memory requirement. Among the options, SO-GAAL is well-suited for image data and efficient training. Although it generally requires a GPU, its short training time compensates for memory constraints, making it a practical choice for medium data where low memory usage is required.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized image datasets and is specifically strong in educational domains. It supports high dimensionality and handles noisy data effectively, which are important for image-based datasets. While it has high memory requirements, it offers short training times and can be scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset's need for low memory use relative to other options that either require longer training times or are not as scalable.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized image datasets in the education domain, as it handles images well and has strengths in education. Although it requires high memory, which is a consideration, it has a short training time and can process large datasets. It is better aligned with the dataset requirements compared to other models, as it supports images directly and manages high dimensionality effectively, which is important for image data.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for a medium-sized image dataset in the education domain with a requirement for low memory usage. It has strengths in handling images, education-specific datasets, high dimensionality, noisy data, and has a relatively short training time. While it typically requires high memory, it does not have a specific weakness in low memory environments like some other models, making it a more balanced choice given the dataset properties and specified model constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a suitable choice due to its strengths in handling image data, education domain relevance, and compatibility with medium-sized datasets while providing short training times. Although VAE requires high memory, its strengths in handling images and maintaining scalability to large datasets align well with the dataset's needs. Other models either lack the strengths for image data or are unsuitable due to memory constraints, such as AnoGAN, AE1SVM, and ALAD.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for medium-sized image datasets, particularly in the education domain. It handles high dimensionality and noisy data efficiently, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Although it has high memory requirements, it maintains a balance between short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it the most fitting choice given the dataset's low memory requirement constraint compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it is strong in handling image data, which matches the data type 'images' of the dataset. Additionally, VAE fits the domain 'education' and is capable of dealing with high dimensionality and some noisy data, which are likely characteristics of the dataset. Despite the 'high memory' weakness, it offers short training time, making it more suitable for medium-sized datasets with a need for efficiency. Other models with a strength in images either have longer training times or don't address the specific domain or data characteristics as effectively as VAE.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized datasets involving images and the educational domain. It is compatible with high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Despite having a 'high memory' requirement, it provides short training time and scalability to large datasets, which can be advantageous even for medium-sized datasets. Other models either have more significant limitations with memory or are less compatible with image data, making VAE the most balanced choice.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, consists of images, falls within the education domain, and has a low memory requirement. VAE excels with images, is applicable in the education domain, supports high dimensionality, and can handle noisy data, which are important dataset characteristics. Although VAE typically requires higher memory, its ability to work with images and handle medium-sized datasets makes it the best choice considering the options available.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable for the given dataset properties because it has strengths in handling images and educational data, which are consistent with the dataset's domain. It also operates efficiently with medium data sizes and offers short training times. Despite its weakness in high memory use, it does not have an explicit weakness in low memory environments, making it a viable option compared to the other models, which have more pronounced weaknesses related to memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it's well-suited for medium-sized image datasets in the education domain. It specializes in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which is beneficial given the dataset's characteristics. Although VAE has high memory requirements, it offers strengths in managing images and provides scalability and short training times, making it a fitting choice for this use case despite the low memory requirement mentioned.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it has strengths in handling image data, aligns well with the education domain, and is capable of managing high-dimensional data with noisy characteristics, which are relevant given the dataset tags. Although it typically requires high memory, it offers short training times which can be beneficial for efficient processing in a medium-sized dataset. The other models either do not perform well with image data in the educational context, require high memory, or have other weaknesses that make them less suitable for this particular dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset because it specifically caters to images, which is the data type in question. Although it has a high memory requirement, it matches the medium data size and domain of education. Additionally, VAE supports high dimensionality, performs well with noisy data, and has a short training time. These attributes align well with the dataset's structure and requirements. Other models like AnoGAN and AutoEncoder also handle images well, but VAE uniquely balances the medium data size with the need for efficient processing, making it the best choice.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for image processing, aligns with the education domain, and can handle medium-sized datasets efficiently. It is also capable of utilizing GPUs and has a relatively short training time, which matches the low memory requirement constraint better than other models. Additionally, VAE's capability to manage high dimensionality and noisy data makes it an appropriate choice for the given dataset properties.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: musk\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"large\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"high dimensionality\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\", \"high memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It can handle large datasets and requires high memory, making it an appropriate choice given the CPU and high memory requirements. Additionally, it includes scalability to large datasets as one of its strengths, making it more suitable than models that either require GPUs or have limited scalability.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset consists of tabular data with high dimensionality, which suits the strengths of the AutoEncoder model as it is effective with high dimensional and noisy data, works well on tabular datasets, and is scalable to large datasets. Additionally, it supports high memory usage which matches the dataset's characteristics for high memory. AutoEncoder's capability for short training time also fits well with the resource requirements of using CPU. Its weaknesses related to small data size, audio, and video data types are irrelevant here.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it has strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality, is scalable to large datasets, and can utilize high memory which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it supports scenarios requiring GPUs, which aligns well with the additional requirements of high memory. While it doesn't excel with CPU usage, its ability to manage noisy data and provide short training time makes it an optimal choice given the dataset properties and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is highly suited for tabular data with high dimensionality and is capable of handling large datasets, aligning well with the dataset properties. It is designed for high memory environments and has a short training time, which matches the CPU and high memory requirement. Additionally, its strengths include scalability to large datasets and effective handling of noise, making it a suitable choice given the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and large datasets. It is capable of efficiently using high memory resources, which aligns with the dataset requirements. Additionally, AutoEncoder has a short training time and can be scaled to large datasets, making it an optimal choice for the given conditions.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is highly suitable for the dataset because it handles tabular data effectively and excels with high dimensionality and large datasets. It also supports high memory, which aligns well with the dataset's additional requirements. Despite its weakness in CPU environments, it compensates with strengths in scalability and short training time using GPUs, making it the best choice considering the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets, which matches the dataset characteristics of having high dimensionality and being large in size. The AutoEncoder can handle tabular data efficiently, offers scalability to large datasets, and supports high memory capacity. Even though it's more optimal with GPU, it remains a fitting choice given the requirement for high memory, which aligns with its strengths, and it maintains a short training time.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset properties which include high dimensionality and tabular data. It effectively handles large datasets and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. While AE1SVM has a weakness with CPU usage, this is mitigated by its strengths such as scalability to large datasets and short training time, making it the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and model analyses.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected as it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It handles high dimensionality and is suited for tabular data, both key aspects of the dataset. AE1SVM is also scalable to large datasets, accommodates high memory requirements, and has a short training time, making it suitable given the dataset size and specified constraints. Although it may struggle slightly with CPU usage, its strengths outweigh this, compared to the other models whose weaknesses are more prominent in relation to the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also scalable to large datasets and capable of working with high memory, aligning with the additional requirements of the dataset. Furthermore, AE1SVM features short training time, making it efficient for the model's computational capabilities. Despite its weakness of requiring GPU for full effectiveness, it remains more aligned with the given dataset compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is a suitable model for the dataset because it handles tabular data well and is effective with high dimensionality, which is a characteristic of the dataset. It is scalable to large datasets and supports high memory, aligning with the dataset's requirements. Additionally, AutoEncoder has a short training time, which is advantageous given the size of the data. While it primarily uses GPU, the requirement for CPU is noted as a weakness across several models, making AutoEncoder a balanced choice despite this limitation.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is chosen because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, matching the dataset properties. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time on GPU, which suits the 'large data size' and 'high memory' requirements. While its weaknesses include CPU usage, it primarily functions on GPU, making it compatible with 'high memory' needs.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is highly suitable for the given dataset properties as it supports tabular data and handles high-dimensionality effectively. It is scalable to large datasets, requires high memory, and has a short training time, which corresponds well with the dataset's characteristics of large size and high memory requirements. Additionally, its strengths in processing tabular data and scalability make it a suitable choice over models with CPU requirements or longer training times.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets and has strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data. It is scalable to large datasets and performs well on high dimensionality while requiring high memory, which aligns with the dataset's CPU and memory capabilities. Despite its weakness in CPU preference, its scalability and alignment with high dimensionality and short training time make it the best choice among the given models for the provided dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and characterized by high dimensionality, requiring high memory support and CPU compatibility. AutoEncoder is a suitable choice as it can efficiently handle large, high-dimensional datasets, supports tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets. Additionally, its ability to handle noisy data and high memory requirements aligns with the dataset's characteristics. While it has weaknesses with CPU usage, its strengths align well with the dataset's high dimensionality and large size.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It excels in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and operates effectively with high memory, both of which are requirements of the dataset. The model's weaknesses related to CPU and long training time are not a concern since CPU is an additional requirement, not a necessity, and AE1SVM benefits from high memory, which can mitigate longer training times.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable because it handles high dimensionality, works well with tabular data, and is capable of scaling to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags provided. Additionally, while it requires high memory, it does not have the CPU-specific limitations that would adversely affect its performance for this dataset type. Given its short training time and adaptability to high dimensional data, it is also a good fit for the 'large' data size characteristic of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the given dataset as it is capable of handling tabular data with high dimensionality and large data sizes. It supports scaling to large datasets and has a short training time, making it compatible with high memory scenarios. Although it prefers a GPU, it is one of the few models that does not explicitly require high memory or GPU resources. The combination of handling high dimensionality and the ability to scale with high memory requirements makes it the most appropriate choice given the dataset properties, despite its weakness of performing on CPU efficiently.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice for this dataset, as it excels with tabular data, which matches the data type in the dataset properties. Additionally, it handles high dimensionality well and is scalable to large datasets, accommodating the dataset's size and characteristics. While it does have a CPU weakness, its strengths in supporting high memory requirements balance this, making it a suitable choice for deployment on a system with high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and characterized by high dimensionality, which aligns well with the strengths of the AutoEncoder. This model can handle high memory requirements and is scalable to large datasets. It is also a suitable choice for tabular data and performs well with high dimensionality. Although it has a weakness for real-time data, this characteristic is not present in the dataset requirements, making the AutoEncoder the most appropriate choice from the provided list.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is a suitable choice for this dataset as it is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets, can handle high memory requirements, and benefits from short training times, addressing the dataset's needs for CPU and high memory utilization. Additionally, AE1SVM supports sparse and imbalanced data, which can be advantageous for high-dimensional datasets. Despite its weaknesses in handling smaller datasets and real-time data, these are not relevant concerns given the dataset's properties.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, can efficiently handle large datasets, and meets the CPU and high memory requirements. It also supports short training time, which is beneficial for large data. Despite having a weakness with imbalanced data, it aligns well with the dataset properties provided, whereas other models have significant drawbacks regarding tabular data or the need for GPU, which the dataset tags don't suggest.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality, which aligns well with the strengths of AE1SVM. This model is suitable for high dimensionality and tabular data, can handle large datasets efficiently, and works well with high memory environments. While AE1SVM generally prefers GPUs, the dataset's characteristics related to CPU and high memory make it an applicable choice, as it is the closest match given the need to process large and complex datasets with high dimensionality.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset as it effectively handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It also supports high memory and is scalable to large datasets, aligning with the dataset's requirements. Additionally, its strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data complement the dataset needs, despite requiring GPU for optimal performance.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset has high dimensionality and is tabular, which aligns well with the strengths of the AutoEncoder model. It can handle high dimensionality and noisy data effectively. Additionally, the model is designed to be scalable to large datasets with high memory requirements, making it suitable for the given dataset properties. Despite requiring GPU, which aligns with the hardware, it does not have real-time or imbalanced data weaknesses that are less relevant in this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is a suitable choice for this dataset because it handles tabular data and high dimensionality well, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets and supports high memory requirements, both key attributes of the dataset. Additionally, it has a short training time and works effectively on imbalanced and sparse data. The dataset's requirement for CPU and its high memory usage fit within the strengths of AE1SVM. While it has weaknesses such as handling noisy data and requiring long training time on a CPU, its advantages align more closely with the dataset characteristics compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the best choice because it is well-suited for handling high-dimensional and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is scalable to large datasets and fits well with the requirement for high memory usage. Although it has a weakness for CPU usage, its other attributes align closely with the dataset requirements, making it a suitable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It can handle large datasets efficiently while leveraging high memory resources, both of which are requirements of the dataset. Its ability for short training time and handling noisy data adds to its compatibility with the dataset properties, despite being more optimized for a GPU rather than a CPU. Other models have limitations with tabular data or high memory usage whereas AutoEncoder aligns well with the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, high dimensional, tabular, and requires a model with high memory capacity. AutoEncoder is suitable because it handles tabular data well, is highly scalable for large datasets, excels in high dimensionality, and supports GPU utilization, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements for CPU and high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is selected because it handles high dimensional tabular data effectively, which aligns with the dataset properties. It is scalable to large datasets and benefits from GPU and high memory, matching the additional requirements. Furthermore, it has a short training time, making it suitable for the task at hand. Despite its weakness in CPU preference, its overall strengths make it the most suitable choice given the dataset characteristics provided.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the dataset properties, including large data size, tabular data, and high dimensionality. It is capable of handling high memory requirements and is scalable to large datasets, which align with the dataset's additional requirements of CPU and high memory. Additionally, it has short training time and supports GPU processing, which is advantageous. While it does have weaknesses with small data size and low-signal data, these do not apply to the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for high dimensionality and tabular data, both of which match the characteristics of the dataset. It is also capable of handling large datasets with a short training time and high memory, aligning well with the dataset requirements. Furthermore, AutoEncoder's strengths include handling noisy data, which may be beneficial given the dataset's potential complexity. Although it typically requires a GPU environment, its ability to scale to large datasets makes it the most suitable choice among the listed models.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice because it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also good for handling large datasets and has the capability to work with noisy data. Additionally, it is scalable and has efficiency in utilizing high memory requirements, which aligns well with the given dataset properties. Despite its weakness in handling small data sizes or requiring a CPU, the large data size and specific compatibility with GPUs and high memory make it a strong contender overall.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable for this dataset because it handles tabular data well and is optimized for high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it supports high memory usage and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the additional requirements of the dataset. Despite its weaknesses in handling CPU processing, it remains a strong candidate due to its adaptability with large and complex datasets needing high memory and GPU support.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality, with the requirement for high memory. AutoEncoder is well-suited for handling high dimensionality and tabular data, showing strengths in scalability to large datasets and high memory usage. Additionally, it provides short training time, making it efficient for large datasets while accommodating high memory needs.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, consists of tabular data with high dimensionality, and requires high memory. AutoEncoder matches these dataset properties effectively as it is suited for large datasets and tabular data, handles high dimensionality well, and is compatible with high memory requirements. While AutoEncoder typically benefits from GPU, the need for CPU can be addressed by appropriate configuration or tuning. Its scalability and short training time also align with handling large, complex datasets efficiently.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and large tabular data. It is also scalable to large datasets, which suits the given dataset size. Moreover, AE1SVM operates well with high memory requirements and provides short training times, aligning with the additional dataset requirements of CPU and high memory. While LUNAR and AutoEncoder are also strong candidates, AE1SVM's specialization in tabular data and scalability with short training time makes it the optimal choice for the given dataset conditions.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is strong in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of this dataset. Additionally, AE1SVM is scalable to large datasets and supports high memory requirements, aligning well with the dataset's requirement for handling large data on CPUs with high memory. Despite being less favorable for small datasets and real-time data, these are not concerns for the current dataset, making AE1SVM a solid choice.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the best choice for the given dataset because it handles tabular data very well and is designed to work with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It performs efficiently on large datasets and can handle noisy data, which is an additional advantage. Though it requires high memory and uses a GPU for optimal performance, it supports short training times and scales effectively, making it ideal for this large, high-dimensional dataset on a CPU with high memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and model characteristics. It supports tabular data and high dimensionality, both critical characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it can handle large datasets efficiently and requires high memory, which aligns well with the dataset's specified requirements. The AutoEncoder's short training time is also beneficial given the computational limitations of using a CPU. It covers the weaknesses associated with using a CPU by not relying solely on GPU, unlike some other models like AnoGAN or ALAD that have a strong GPU dependency.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice for the dataset characterized by large size, tabular data, and high dimensionality, which requires robust handling with high memory capacity and scalability. AE1SVM effectively supports high dimensionality and tabular data, offers scalability to large datasets, and operates well with GPU resources. While it mentions a weakness with CPU usage, it aligns closely with the requirement of high memory and is tailored for short training times, making it a fitting option given the dataset characteristics and model strengths.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is chosen because it excels with large, high-dimensional tabular data, which matches the dataset's properties. It has strengths in dealing with noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics, and it is capable of handling large datasets efficiently. Additionally, it supports high memory usage, which is a requirement. The quick training time and scalability are advantageous, ensuring efficient use of CPU resources despite the model's typical preference for GPUs.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It supports large datasets and requires high memory, which matches the dataset properties. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, its ability to handle large, high-dimensional tabular datasets on a GPU makes it the best fit among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it is well-suited for handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is scalable to large datasets and requires high memory, matching the additional requirements. While it is not optimized for CPU, its strengths in tabular data and high dimensionality make it the most suitable choice given the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the best choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data efficiently. It is scalable to large datasets and is well-suited for high memory requirements, as noted in the dataset tags. Additionally, the AutoEncoder supports noisy data which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. Despite its CPU weakness, its other strengths make it the most suitable choice among the given models.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of 'large', 'tabular data', and 'high dimensionality'. Additionally, AE1SVM supports high memory usage and is scalable to large datasets, addressing the dataset's requirement for 'high memory'. While it may have a longer training time and requires a GPU, these constraints do not conflict with the dataset's properties, making it a strong candidate given the other available options from the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is optimal for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, which are key properties of the dataset. It is scalable to large datasets and can utilize high memory, which aligns well with the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, this model has a short training time and works well with noisy data, further complementing the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is best suited for this dataset as it handles tabular data well, supports high dimensionality, scales to large datasets, and has a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of being large and high-dimensional. Although it prefers GPU, which is compatible, it can operate with high memory. Its strengths in dealing with noisy data are beneficial too. Despite the preference for a GPU, its overall compatibility with the dataset needs makes it the most appropriate choice.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset has large size, is of tabular type, and exhibits high dimensionality, which aligns well with the strengths of AutoEncoder. AutoEncoder is adept at handling tabular data and high dimensionality, and it is scalable to large datasets while operating efficiently with high memory. Despite the dataset requiring CPU capability, AutoEncoder supports efficient processing with its high memory strength, and its short training time is advantageous. Thus, AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is best suited for the given dataset properties as it supports tabular data and can handle high dimensionality effectively. It is scalable to large datasets and has strengths in handling noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics provided. Additionally, the model's demand for high memory aligns with the dataset's 'high memory' requirement, making it an excellent fit for the given conditions.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: vowels\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"data_size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"data_type\": [\"time series\"],\n", + " \"domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"characteristics\": [],\n", + " \"additional_requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset requires a model with low memory usage and ability to handle medium-sized time series data. While none of the models explicitly list time series as a strength, AutoEncoder does not specify it as a weakness and offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it suitable for medium-sized datasets with potential high dimensionality. Additionally, the requirement for low memory outweighs the minor weaknesses related to imbalanced data and low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is selected because it handles medium-sized datasets efficiently, can process noisy data well, and works with high dimensionality. While it is noted for its preference for high memory usage, in this dataset context with the given constraints, it is preferable over the others due to its strengths in large datasets and short training times which support scalability and low-memory requirements better than the weaknesses of other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is chosen as it can handle medium-sized datasets and is scalable to large datasets. While it doesn't explicitly specialize in time series data, it possesses strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which can be beneficial. Despite its weaknesses with small datasets and low-memory requirements, its short training time and adequate scalability make it more suitable than other models for this dataset's constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for medium-sized datasets and excels with high dimensionality and sparse data. Although it has weaknesses regarding low memory, it is the most compatible option given that the dataset is a time series. Other models either have weaknesses specific to time series data or have more severe memory usage issues. AE1SVM's high memory usage can be mitigated better than models like MO-GAAL or AnoGAN, which also have incompatibilities with time series data.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, pertains to a time-series domain, and needs a model with low memory requirements. Although AutoEncoder has a weakness with small data sizes, this does not apply here. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which can be encountered in time series datasets. Additionally, it requires a short training time and is scalable, which is beneficial for medium-sized datasets. AutoEncoder is the best fit among the given options, as other models exhibit significant weaknesses related to time series or low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset tags and requirements. Although time series data is not explicitly mentioned in the strengths, AutoEncoders can be adapted to handle time series data effectively, especially when it involves feature extraction or anomaly detection tasks. The dataset is of medium size and requires low memory usage; while AutoEncoders are generally categorized under high memory models, they can be designed to be memory-efficient with smaller architectures and proper tuning. Additionally, AutoEncoders have strengths in scalability to large datasets, short training time, and applicability to high-dimensional, noisy data types that are common in time series tasks, which makes them a viable choice considering the constraints and the characteristics of the dataset provided.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized and involves time series data with a requirement for low memory usage. AutoEncoder is a good choice as it has strengths in handling time series data indirectly through dimensionality reduction, it is scalable to larger datasets, and offers short training time. While it typically requires high memory, it can be adjusted for medium-sized data through appropriate configurations. The challenges with other models include weaknesses directly associated with time series data or higher memory requirements without scalability options.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a medium-sized time series with a low memory requirement. While none of the models perfectly match all criteria, Deep SVDD is somewhat suitable because it handles high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets (which conveys adaptability). Although it has a long training time and memory issues, it is the closest fit available from the list, as most other models explicitly list time series or low memory as weaknesses. Careful model design and optimization could help manage memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a medium-sized time series data with a requirement for low memory usage. While none of the listed models is specifically designed for time series, VAE has strengths in handling high-dimensional data and works well with datasets that are not real-time. Despite requiring high memory, it has strong compatibility with datasets that are bigger in size. Given the constraints and dataset characteristics, VAE is the most suitable option due to its adaptability and ability to efficiently process medium-sized datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable for medium-sized datasets and can handle high-dimensionality and noisy data, which are common in time series data. Although it does not explicitly mention time series as a strength, it has a broad application in handling complex data types. Additionally, AutoEncoder offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which compensates for its high memory requirement given the requirement for low memory preferences over time. Other models have specific weaknesses on time series data or low memory which makes AutoEncoder the more balanced choice among the provided options.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Although AutoEncoder does not specialize specifically in time series data, it is suitable for medium-sized datasets and offers a balance between high dimensional data processing and resilience to noisy data. Given the requirements for low memory usage, it is the least unsuitable compared to other models, despite its high memory preference. Other models have explicit weaknesses against time series data or high memory usage, which makes them less suitable choices for this dataset scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a medium-sized time series requiring low memory usage. AutoEncoder is suitable due to its ability to handle high-dimensional datasets with noisy data, possesses short training time, offers scalability to large datasets, and strong performance with GPU processing. Although AutoEncoder is not specifically focused on time series, its overall strengths align better with the given requirements compared to other models, which either have weaknesses with low memory or time series data.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a medium-sized time series dataset with a requirement for low memory usage. AutoEncoder is suitable due to its short training time and scalability to large datasets. While it typically requires high memory, its suitability for high dimensionality and noisy data makes it a better fit compared to other models in this list for time series data, especially when other models like SO-GAAL, DevNet, and ALAD have explicit weaknesses in handling time series data.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is chosen because it primarily handles high-dimensional data and is scalable to large datasets. While it has weaknesses such as long training time and high memory usage, the dataset's additional requirement for low memory is a challenge across nearly all models. Deep SVDD is the closest match as it offers some scalability, and the dataset format as a time series is not explicitly listed as a weakness for this model. Certainly, the model selection is not perfect due to inherent dataset constraints and model capabilities mismatch, but Deep SVDD stands out as the most relevant option.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a medium-sized time series with low memory requirements. AutoEncoder can handle high dimensionality and medium-sized datasets effectively with short training times and scalability to large datasets. Despite being weak with real-time data, which is not specified as a need here, it is suitable for handling noisy data and supports GPU, which can help mitigate any resource concerns. Other models in the list typically have significant weaknesses for either time series or low memory environments, making AutoEncoder the most balanced choice given the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Although none of the models are perfectly suited for time series data and low memory requirements, AutoEncoder is a more generalized model that can handle medium-sized datasets effectively and operates well with high dimensionality and noisy data. It also benefits from short training times and good scalability, which makes it more adaptable to a variety of situations beyond its primary strengths, even if low memory is a limitation as noted in combination with high memory requirement. None of the available models explicitly support both time series and low memory, but AutoEncoder's flexibility and scalability across different data types give it an edge over other options in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it can handle medium-sized datasets, is suitable for domains requiring low memory usage, and accommodates high dimensionality data, which matches the dataset properties. Even though it has weaknesses with small data sizes and specific types of imbalanced data, those weaknesses do not heavily apply to the given dataset provided. It also offers a short training time which aligns with additional requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is chosen because it handles medium-sized datasets well, works efficiently with time series data, and is able to manage noisy data efficiently. While it requires high memory and GPU, the strengths in handling high dimensionality and scalable datasets make it a suitable candidate. Although it is not specifically optimized for low memory, none of the models are perfectly aligned with all of the requirements, making AutoEncoder the most balanced option given the dataset characteristics and model analyses provided.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the best choice for a medium-sized time series dataset with low memory requirements. While it does have challenges with small data sizes and memory-intensive processes, it is scalable to large datasets and performs well with high dimensionality and noisy data, both of which are common in time series data. It also has the advantage of short training times and, importantly, supports application across multiple domains, which suits the dataset's unspecified domain category and additional low memory requirement despite specific weaknesses in low-memory scenarios.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected because it has the capability to handle time series data due to its adaptability in capturing complex patterns in high-dimensional data which can be beneficial for time series analysis. Additionally, it requires short training time and can be efficient with GPU support, which suits the dataset's requirement for low memory usage. While it does have a weakness with small data size, the dataset size is medium, which should be adequate. Other models either explicitly list time series as a weakness or require high memory, which is unsuitable given the dataset's constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized and is a time series type with a low memory requirement. Although none of the models have strengths directly associated with time series data, the AutoEncoder is capable of handling medium-sized datasets, has strengths in handling technological data with high dimensionality and noisy data, and can scale well to large datasets, which may indirectly benefit time series. Despite the low memory requirement, AutoEncoder's strength in short training times is beneficial. Other models, such as DevNet and ALAD, explicitly state weaknesses against time series data. Moreover, AutoEncoder does not specify weakness in memory constraints, making it a balanced choice given the constraints and alternatives.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model considering the dataset properties. While the dataset is a time series, which is not explicitly a strength of the AutoEncoder, it is not a weakness either. Furthermore, the dataset requires low memory usage. The AutoEncoder's general weakness is with small data sizes, but with a medium-sized dataset, this issue is less prominent. The capacity of AutoEncoders for handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets makes it flexible enough to be adapted adequately to handle time series data, given the other models have explicit weaknesses in either time series or memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized and characterized as a time series with a requirement for low memory usage. Most models in the list either have weaknesses with time series data or high memory consumption. The AutoEncoder, however, is suitable for high-dimensional, noisy data and offers short training times. Although it is typically high memory, it balances the pros and cons better than other options. Additionally, AutoEncoder's ability to handle medium-sized datasets and scale to large datasets makes it a pragmatic choice despite its general weaknesses not favoring low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Despite the dataset being time series and having a requirement for low memory usage, the AutoEncoder model is the most suitable option because it supports time series data indirectly through transformation and feature extraction. It provides strengths such as scalability to large datasets and short training time, which aligns with the medium data size and the requirement for low memory usage, while having minimal impact from its weaknesses on this application.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is chosen because it handles high dimensionality, noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets—all important for a medium-sized time series dataset. While AutoEncoder typically relies on GPU and high memory usage, its short training time aligns well with the need for low memory requirements compared to other models, such as AnoGAN and AE1SVM, which have long training times and issues with scalability or memory. Other models, like ALAD and DevNet, have weaknesses in handling time series data.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a medium-sized time series with a requirement for low memory usage. Although no model perfectly fits all criteria, an AutoEncoder is relatively more adaptable to medium-sized datasets and time series data compared to others. It supports GPU, which can help in maintaining low memory usage, and it has a short training time, which benefits from quick processing. Despite some weaknesses in real-time and low-memory applications, it provides versatility across domains and data types, making it the most balanced option available from the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a medium-sized time series with a low memory requirement. While none of the models are perfectly suited for time series data with low memory requirements, the AutoEncoder model has strengths in handling medium-sized datasets, high dimensionality, and scalability to large datasets without consuming excessive memory. Its short training time is also beneficial for time series tasks. Although it doesn't specialize in time series, it is a versatile model that can be adapted for varied applications, making it a suitable choice given the options.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a medium-sized time series with a requirement for low memory usage. While none of the models are perfectly suited for time series analysis, the AutoEncoder model is somewhat more versatile, handling high dimensionality and noisy data (common in time series) effectively. Although it does not mention low memory explicitly, AutoEncoder manages to handle various data types and large datasets efficiently, making it a slightly better fit given the constraints. The other models have more significant weaknesses in relation to time series data or require high memory, which is unsuitable for this dataset's requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is of medium size, is a time series, and requires low memory consumption. While AutoEncoder is typically high memory, it has the necessary strengths for handling high-dimensional, noisy data and is scalable to large datasets with a short training time. Though not explicitly strong in time series, it fits better than others given the constraints, as many other models are unsuitable for time series or are high in memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable for the dataset properties since it is scalable to medium-sized datasets and operates well with high dimensionality, which is common in time series data. It also handles noisy data effectively. Although it generally requires high memory, the focus on short training time aligns with the requirement for efficiency. The weaknesses related to small data size and real-time data are not pertinent here, making the AutoEncoder a viable choice given the requirements and dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AnoGAN\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Although none of the models are perfectly suited for a medium-sized, low-memory time series dataset, AnoGAN is chosen as it has fewer critical weaknesses related to memory compared to most other models. Despite its limitation with low memory and real-time data, its lack of other time series-focused alternatives makes it relatively better fitted for this selection. Other models have significant weaknesses with time series data, which is a crucial aspect of this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Although none of the models is specifically tailored for time series data in the provided list, AutoEncoder has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, making it versatile. Additionally, it offers short training times and is scalable to large datasets, which can be beneficial for medium-sized datasets. While it has weaknesses with small data sizes and lacks some time-series-specific capabilities, its overall strengths align more closely with the dataset tags provided, especially under the constraint of suitable low-memory models.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is selected due to its ability to handle medium-sized datasets in a memory-efficient manner. Although this is a time series dataset and AutoEncoder is not specifically strong in handling time series data, its efficiency with respect to memory and scalable to large datasets makes it a viable option considering the low memory requirement and the medium data size. Other models like DevNet, ALAD, and LUNAR have explicit weaknesses in handling time series data. AutoEncoder's capability to manage noisy data, short training time, and scalability make it the most suitable given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it is suitable for medium-sized datasets, handles time series data, and offers low memory requirements compared to other models in the list. Its strengths in handling high-dimensional and noisy data align well with typical characteristics of time series datasets. While not explicitly mentioned for time series, it provides the best trade-off in terms of adaptability and resource requirements, especially given the need for low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Given the dataset tags of medium-sized time series data with a requirement for low memory, AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice. It supports high dimensionality and noisy data, which can be prevalent in time series datasets. Although it typically requires high memory, it compensates with a short training time and good scalability to larger datasets. While not optimally suited for small data sizes or real-time processing, its overall alignment with the data characteristics makes it the best fit from the available model list.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which are advantageous for medium-sized datasets. Although it has a weakness with time series data, the other models either have low memory as a weakness, are not suited for time series, or have long training times. LUNAR's strength in being scalable and efficient outweighs its one weakness in the given context.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is chosen because it effectively handles medium-sized datasets and can cope with high dimensionality, which is useful for time series data. It has strengths such as working with technology and finance domains, which cover a broad range. Despite a drawback with small data size, our dataset is medium-sized, allowing us to leverage its efficient training time and scalability. Additionally, it supports the use of GPU and aligns with additional requirements such as low memory usage, making it a suitable choice for the given dataset's constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset involves a medium-sized time series with low memory requirements. While none of the models specifically list time series as a strength, AutoEncoder is suitable for high dimensionality and is capable of handling noisy data. It has short training times and can be scalable to large datasets, which fits the medium data size characteristic. Despite not being optimized for low memory, it holds a better balance of required characteristics compared to other models, which have more critical weaknesses such as inefficiency with time series or low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is suitable for the dataset as it is capable of handling medium-sized datasets and offers strengths in dealing with time series data, which aligns with the dataset's time series nature. Despite its high memory usage, its other strengths like handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets make it more adept in comparison to other models on the list, given the requirement for low memory.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it supports high dimensional dataset types and works well with noisy data, which aligns with the given dataset type. It also offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which compensates for the medium data size. Despite its weakness with small data sizes, the dataset size here is medium which shouldn't be a significant issue. Additionally, although it has high memory usage as a weakness, the requirements didn't explicitly prohibit models with relatively high memory usage. This model does not have any listed weaknesses related to time series data, making it more suitable than the other options in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it can handle medium-sized datasets and time series applications efficiently, even though the dataset has a low memory requirement. While AutoEncoder is generally used in high memory scenarios, its adaptability and efficiency in time series data, combined with its good performance on medium-sized datasets, make it suitable compared to other models in this list that specifically list time series as a weakness.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a medium-sized time series with a requirement for low memory usage. Despite the low memory requirement not aligning perfectly with AutoEncoder's strength in terms of memory and time series data handling, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets, along with its short training time, make it the most suitable choice given the constraints. Other models in the list have weaknesses directly conflicting with the key aspects of the dataset, such as issues with time series data or low memory performance.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized and requires low memory usage, which is a challenge for most models but not a direct disqualifier for AutoEncoder. AutoEncoder is well-suited for time series data and is capable of handling medium data sizes efficiently. It also supports GPU, which can help speed up processing time, addressing the time series requirement efficiently. Despite its weakness with small data sizes, this model can manage medium-sized datasets and supports short training times and high-dimensional data, making it the most suitable choice among the provided options.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized time series datasets with low memory requirements. Although it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, this is less relevant to the given dataset. Its strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data alongside short training time make it a suitable candidate, considering low memory constraints. The absence of significant weaknesses related to time series data makes it the best available option given the context.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is the most suitable model given the dataset's requirements. Even though the dataset is time series, the model performs well with high dimensional data and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with 'medium' data size. Importantly, Deep SVDD does not have a specific memory constraint, making it appropriate for low-memory scenarios. The dataset does not present noisy or imbalanced data, which are weaknesses of Deep SVDD. Thus, it is the best fit among the provided options, given the dataset's characteristics and additional low memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the best choice based on the provided dataset characteristics. Although the dataset is tagged as time series, which is not a specific strength of AutoEncoder, it is suited for medium-sized datasets and can handle high dimensional and noisy data effectively, both of which are common in time series analysis. It also supports scalability to large datasets, uses GPUs efficiently (which is preferable for low memory usage), and has short training times. Despite its weakness in handling imbalanced and real-time data, these are not given requirements, making it more compatible with the low memory constraint compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is suitable for medium-sized datasets and provides support for time series through high dimensionality capabilities. It performs well with noisy data and is capable of short training times, which is beneficial for low memory requirements. Although it has weaknesses with small data sizes, this dataset is medium-sized, which should be adequate. AutoEncoder's capability for high-dimensional data and scalability to large datasets matches the dataset's properties better than the other alternatives, which have specific weaknesses with time series or are not optimized for low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is chosen because it supports medium-sized datasets well, handles high dimensionality and noisy data which could be present in time series data. It also has the advantage of a short training time and scalability to large datasets. Although it has a few weaknesses, such as not being specifically strong for time series and requiring high memory, given the dataset's requirement of low memory, other options from the model list exhibit more severe weaknesses with time series data, making AutoEncoder the best compromise considering the given dataset properties and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a medium-sized time series with low memory requirements. Among the available models, the AutoEncoder is the most suitable due to its ability to handle high dimensionality and noisy data, which is typical in time series. Despite its weakness with small data sizes, the medium data size here is sufficient, and its strength in being scalable to large datasets ensures it can handle the medium data size efficiently. Other models either have weaknesses in handling time series data or require high memory, making AutoEncoder the best compromise given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is chosen as it is well-suited for medium-sized datasets and can handle high dimensionality, which can be relevant for time series data. It has strengths in scalable datasets and a short training time, which is beneficial when considering low memory constraints. Although time series isn't explicitly mentioned as its strength, it generally performs reasonably well on diverse types of data, including time-series. Its weaknesses such as small data size and imbalanced data do not apply to the current dataset, making it the most suitable choice from the list.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: optdigits\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"images\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"education\", \"technology\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"high dimensionality\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"GPU\", \"high memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is most suitable due to its strengths in handling images, technology, high dimensionality, and its capability to leverage GPU effectively. It is well-suited for datasets requiring high memory and supports short training time, addressing the additional requirements perfectly. While VAE does have some weaknesses with imbalanced and categorical data, these aspects are not highlighted in the dataset tags, making VAE a robust choice overall for the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the task as it caters to images, supports high-dimensional data, and leverages GPU capabilities, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is known for handling large datasets efficiently with high memory requirements, making it ideal for the educational and technological domain. Although AnoGAN and AutoEncoder also handle images well, VAE stands out due to its compatibility with the education domain, high memory usage, and ability to manage high dimensionality combined with short training times.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It excels with images and high-dimensional data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it supports GPU and high memory usage, which are required for this task. It has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it suitable for a medium-sized data set in education and technology domains.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice for the given dataset tags, as it has strengths in handling image data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it supports GPU and high memory requirements, making it suitable for the dataset's additional requirements. The model's strengths in education and technology domains further align with the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the optimal choice as it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It supports image data, high dimensionality, and is well-suited for the technology and education domains. Moreover, VAE benefits from GPU acceleration, handles high memory requirements effectively, and trains on medium data sizes efficiently. Its ability to scale to large datasets and deal with noisy data further complements the dataset's attributes.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is highly suited for this dataset because it handles images and high-dimensional data effectively, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is also compatible with the requirements of GPU usage and high memory, allowing for efficient processing and training time. Moreover, its ability to handle noisy data and be scalable to large datasets makes it a robust choice for the educational and technology domain context provided.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the best choice because it is well-suited for image data with high dimensionality, aligning perfectly with the dataset's characteristics. It supports GPU and high memory environments, which are additional requirements of the dataset. Furthermore, VAE is efficient with large datasets and has a short training time, addressing potential computational constraints. Its strengths in handling image data in educational and technological contexts make it an ideal fit for the given domain.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, technology and education domains, and GPU usage. It requires high memory and offers short training time, which aligns well with the additional requirements of the dataset. Unlike some other models, it doesn't have notable weaknesses towards image data or high dimensionality, making it the best fit from the provided options.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is highly suitable for the dataset due to its strengths in handling image data and high dimensionality, which fits with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it operates well with technology and education domains. The requirements for GPU and high memory are also perfectly matched by VAE's capabilities. Moreover, VAE has short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it a strong fit for the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is highly suitable for this dataset due to its strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and its applicability to the technology and education domains. It supports GPU acceleration, which is ideal for high memory requirements. Additionally, it has a short training time and can handle large datasets effectively, aligning well with the medium-sized, high-memory image dataset tags provided.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is a highly suitable choice given the dataset properties and model characteristics. The dataset consists of images, is of medium size, and has high dimensionality, which aligns well with VAE's strengths. The VAE is well-suited for image datasets and can handle high-dimensionality with the use of GPUs and high memory, meeting the dataset's additional requirements. Its capability for short training times and scalability to large datasets further makes it an optimal choice, as other models could present longer training times or are not scalable. VAE also aligns with the application domains of education and technology.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is centered around medium-sized image data with high dimensionality, found in the education and technology domains. VAE is well-suited for these characteristics as it excels at handling images, high dimensionality, and is effective in the technology and education domains. Moreover, VAE supports GPU and requires high memory, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, it has the advantage of short training time, which can be beneficial for handling a medium-sized dataset efficiently.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It strengths align well with the requirements: it is strong in handling images, which is key since the data type is images. It handles high dimensionality well, a critical characteristic of the dataset. It supports the education and technology domains relevant to the dataset. VAE requires high memory and makes efficient use of a GPU, both of which are listed additional requirements. Additionally, it can manage noisy data and scales to large datasets, meeting more of the dataset's needs.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is highly suitable for the given dataset properties as it handles images effectively, leverages high dimensionality, and requires GPU and high memory, which aligns with the dataset requirements. Additionally, VAE is effective in domains like technology and education, and it supports large datasets with a short training time, making it the most fitting choice compared to other models, which have greater weaknesses in these areas.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which align with the dataset properties. It also supports GPU and high memory requirements, making it capable of efficiently processing medium-sized datasets with high dimensionality in the education and technology domains. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model fits well with the dataset properties as it is suited for image data with high dimensionality, which is a crucial requirement for the given dataset. It also supports GPU processing and can handle high memory demands, ensuring efficient processing of medium-sized datasets. Furthermore, VAE is scalable to large datasets and requires only short training time, making it a practical choice for technology and education domains. Other model options failed to meet some of these critical requirements, such as support for GPU and high memory or suitability for image data with high dimensionality.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model is the most suitable choice for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling images, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It is also well-suited for high dimensionality and works effectively in technological and educational domains, as reflected in the dataset tags. VAE supports GPU usage and high memory requirements, which are also specified dataset needs. Additionally, its ability to handle noisy data and large datasets makes it an ideal fit given the dataset's high dimensionality and medium size.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well suited for the dataset as it effectively handles images and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of this dataset. It is also compatible with technology and education domains, aligning with the dataset's domain tags. Additionally, VAE can handle noisy data, utilizes GPU, supports high memory requirements, has a short training time, and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset's additional requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is the best choice for this dataset because it specifically handles images with high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset properties. It is suitable for educational and technological domains, supports GPU, and is effective with high memory settings. VAEs also provide short training times and are scalable to large datasets, matching the dataset's characteristics and requirements. Despite its limitations with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced datasets, these do not apply significantly here, making it a suitable model for this context.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is highly suitable for the dataset due to its strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, the technology domain, and educational domains, which align well with the dataset tags. It also supports GPU and high memory requirements, both of which are necessary given the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, VAE offers short training times on large datasets, which is advantageous for efficient model development in medium-sized image datasets. Although it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced datasets, these are not primary concerns according to the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It is proficient with images and high dimensionality, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. Furthermore, it supports GPU acceleration and high memory, addressing the additional requirements. VAE also demonstrates strengths in the domains of education and technology, making it particularly fit for this dataset. Its capabilities with large datasets and short training times offer additional advantages, making VAE the most suitable model from the provided list.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is best suited for the given dataset properties as it excels at handling image data with high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, AutoEncoder is GPU compatible, supports high memory usage, and has a short training time, making it efficient for medium-sized datasets. Its scalability to large datasets and ability to manage noisy data further complement the dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is selected as it aligns well with the dataset properties. The dataset characteristics include medium-sized image data with high dimensionality, a requirement for GPU, and high memory. VAE specifically excels in handling images, high dimensionality, and operates efficiently with GPU and high memory environments. It also has a short training time, which is advantageous. Additionally, it fits well within the education and technology domain specified in the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling images with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset properties. VAE supports technology and education domains, aligns well with the requirement for GPU and high memory, and can process noisy data efficiently. Furthermore, it offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets, meeting all the additional dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the best choice for this dataset because it is well-suited for images with high dimensionality and it benefits from GPU and high memory usage, which matches the dataset requirements. It is scalable to large datasets, and although there are some weaknesses related to small data sizes and imbalanced data, these are not as critical given the dataset's medium size and lack of mention of imbalance. Additionally, the short training time is advantageous for practical deployment.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset as it aligns well with the dataset properties and requirements. The dataset is described as having medium size and involves images with high dimensionality, which VAE can handle effectively due to its strengths in images and high dimensionality. Additionally, it supports GPU processing and high memory usage, which matches the additional requirements of the dataset. VAE's robustness against noisy data and its adaptability to large datasets make it an ideal choice for the educational and technological domain specified.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It is suitable for medium-sized datasets with high dimensionality and image data, which are the main features of the dataset. VAE performs well with high memory and GPU resources available, as required by the dataset. Additionally, it supports technology and education domains, making it a good fit for this task. Its strengths in handling large datasets and short training time further enhance its suitability.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is particularly well-suited for the given dataset because it is strong in handling images with high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It also supports high memory and leverages GPUs effectively, which is necessary since a GPU and high memory are additional requirements. Though VAE has weaknesses with imbalanced, sparse, or categorical data, none of these are specified as issues with the dataset. Additionally, the education and technology domains of the dataset align well with VAE's strengths.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset because it excels with image data, which matches the data type. It handles high dimensionality well, a key characteristic of this dataset. Additionally, VAE benefits from a GPU and high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. Its strengths in education and technology domains make it a good fit for the dataset's domain. Moreover, VAE has a short training time and can scale to large datasets, addressing the medium data size effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model because it effectively handles the high dimensionality and image data present in the dataset. Given the 'medium' data size and requirements for GPU and high memory, VAE is well-equipped with strengths in images, high dimensionality, GPU capability, and high memory. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which aligns well with the dataset properties and additional requirements tagged.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice as it aligns well with the dataset properties. It excels in handling image data, supports high dimensionality, and fits the domain of education and technology. Additionally, it leverages GPU and high memory requirements effectively while offering short training times for medium-sized datasets. Despite the challenges with discrete or categorical data, these are not explicit concerns in the given dataset attributes, making VAE a strong candidate.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for a medium-sized dataset consisting of images with high dimensionality in the education and technology domain. The model's strengths align well with the dataset's characteristics, as it is specifically strong in handling image data, high dimensionality, and can utilize GPU and high memory effectively. Additionally, VAE has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it versatile for the given requirements. Despite its weaknesses in handling discrete or imbalanced data, these do not apply in this context, making VAE an optimal choice.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the best choice as it is well-suited for image data, aligns with the educational and technology domain, handles high dimensionality, and is capable of leveraging GPU and high memory resources. It also has short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which fits the medium-sized dataset requirement. Although it struggles with imbalanced and sparse data, these issues are not highlighted as critical dataset tags, making VAE the most compatible option based on strengths.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model is the most suitable choice for the provided dataset characteristics. The dataset includes medium-sized image data with high dimensionality, falling under the education and technology domains, and requiring GPU and high memory resources. VAE is strong with images, high dimensionality, and education/technology domains, while also being optimized for use with GPUs and high memory. It has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. These align well with the dataset requirements, making it the best fit compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the best choice for the given dataset because it is particularly strong at handling images and high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, VAE supports GPU and high memory requirements and has been noted for its capability to handle large datasets within the technology and education domains. Its short training time is an added advantage for efficient processing.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, consists of images, and has high dimensionality, which aligns well with VAE's strengths. VAE is well-suited for dealing with images, high dimensionality, and education and technology domains. It supports GPU and high memory, which meets the dataset's additional requirements. It also handles noisy data and has a short training time, making it a strong candidate considering the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for image data with high dimensionality, as indicated in the dataset properties. It supports GPU use and high memory, which are additional requirements for this dataset. The VAE model also has strengths in both the education and technology domains, which match the dataset domain. It handles noisy data appropriately and is scalable to large datasets, matching the dataset's medium size. It has a short training time, which is beneficial for efficient model development.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it aligns well with the dataset properties: working effectively with images and handling high dimensionality. It requires GPU and high memory, which matches the additional requirements. Moreover, it has the capability for short training times and can manage large datasets. Although it struggles with discrete data and imbalanced datasets, these weaknesses are not relevant given the dataset characteristics, making VAE an apt selection for educational and technological image data analysis.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties which include images, high dimensionality, and the requirement for high memory and GPU capabilities. VAE's strengths align well with these properties, as it is particularly strong with images, handles high dimensionality effectively, and is optimized for GPUs with high memory. Additionally, VAE provides short training time and works well with large datasets, making it an ideal choice for a medium data size in the educational technology domain.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset as it has strengths in handling image data, high dimensionality, and is compatible with GPU usage. It is particularly strong in the domains of technology and education, which match the dataset's domain tags. Furthermore, VAE can manage high memory requirements and offers short training time, making it ideal given the high memory need and medium data size. Although it has weaknesses with certain types of data, these do not conflict with the properties of the provided dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is highly suitable for the given dataset properties because it is specifically strong in handling images with high dimensionality, which aligns with the 'images' and 'high dimensionality' tags of the dataset. VAE also supports GPU and high memory usage, matching the additional requirements. Moreover, it aligns well with the educational and technological domains. Despite its weaknesses, the VAE remains efficient for the dataset size indicated as 'medium' and does not suffer significantly from issues with the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model as it is strong in handling images with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it is designed for use with GPU and high memory, meeting the additional requirements, and is well-suited for technology and education domains. Compared to other models, VAE has the advantage of short training times, handling large datasets, and dealing with noisy data, making it an optimal choice given the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a strong candidate for the given dataset because it handles images, high dimensionality, and noisy data effectively. It is compatible with GPU usage and high memory requirements, which aligns with the additional dataset needs. Furthermore, its strengths in technology and education domains, along with a short training time on large datasets, make it an excellent choice for the provided dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it is strong in handling images, which matches the data type of the dataset. It also effectively handles high dimensionality and can leverage a GPU and high memory, addressing the dataset's additional requirements. Furthermore, VAE is well-suited for educational and technology domains, aligns with the dataset's mentioned domains, and supports short training times, which could be beneficial depending on implementation constraints. While some weaknesses exist in terms of discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, for this dataset's tags, VAE’s strengths are the best match.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational AutoEncoder) model is best suited for the dataset as it effectively handles high-dimensional image data, which aligns with the dataset's properties of 'images', 'high dimensionality', and 'technology'. VAE is also known for its strengths in the education domain and supports the additional requirements of using a GPU and high memory capacity. It offers a short training time, which is beneficial given the dataset's medium size and requirement for high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable for this dataset because it is specifically strong in processing images and handling high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's high dimensionality and image-type characteristics. It also supports GPU and requires high memory, which fits the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, AutoEncoder can manage large datasets efficiently with relatively short training times. It provides a balance between the dataset's medium size and the educational and technology domains, making it a versatile choice for various image processing tasks in these fields.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is well-suited for high dimensional image data, which is the type of data in the dataset. It operates efficiently on GPUs and requires high memory, matching the additional requirements for model performance in high-dimensional spaces. VAE offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which addresses the medium data size needs. Additionally, VAE is applicable to the education and technology domain, making it a strong fit for this application.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset involves images with high dimensionality and requires a model that can utilize GPUs and handle high memory. The AutoEncoder is well-suited for this dataset as it has strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and utilizing GPU and high memory resources. Additionally, it offers short training times and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's medium size and education and technology domains. Despite its weaknesses, such as handling small datasets and imbalanced data, these are not critical for the given dataset's properties. Therefore, AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is best suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling images and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is capable of using GPU and accommodating high memory needs, as required by the dataset properties. Moreover, it has a short training time and can scale to large datasets, aligning well with the 'medium' data size described. These attributes make AutoEncoder the optimal choice over other models, which may have specific weaknesses, such as in handling noisy data, imbalanced data, or scalability issues.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is highly suitable for the dataset as it excels with image data, which is the type of data in this case. It supports high-dimensionality and technology domains, both of which are relevant to the dataset. The model also requires a GPU and high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. VAE additionally offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which are beneficial given the medium data size.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: satellite\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"large\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"agriculture\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"high dimensionality\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for the given dataset characteristics as it effectively handles high dimensionality and tabular data, two key aspects of the dataset tags. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's large size requirement. Despite its weakness on CPU usage, its strength in short training time and capability to manage high dimensionality and sparse data make it a strong candidate for agricultural domain data, ensuring efficient processing given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected because it handles tabular data and high dimensionality effectively, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which is crucial given the dataset's large size. While there is a weakness noted for CPU use, the model's strengths in handling large datasets, high dimensionality, and tabular data make it the most suitable choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset properties. It is scalable to large datasets and supports high dimensionality, which is crucial for this task. The weaknesses related to CPU do not significantly outweigh the advantages for handling large datasets on CPUs since it has short training times and is highly suitable for the data characteristics mentioned.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for the dataset's characteristics, including 'large' data size, 'tabular data' type, 'high dimensionality', and requirement for scalability on CPU resources. It is capable of handling high dimensionality and tabular data effectively. Although it has a weakness with CPU as an additional requirement, it balances this by offering 'short training time' and 'scalability to large datasets', making it a good fit overall, given the dataset's requirements and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset's characteristics. It excels in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset tags. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and offers a short training time, which fits the large data size requirement. While AE1SVM has weaknesses related to CPU utilization, its ability to handle high dimensional tabular data and scalability outweighs this limitation in the context of the provided dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice based on the dataset properties. It handles tabular data well and efficiently deals with high dimensionality, making it apt for large datasets. It also has a short training time and scales well to large datasets, which is beneficial when dealing with high-dimensional, large-scale data. Despite its weakness in CPU utilization, its strengths outweigh other models for the given dataset characteristics, particularly in high dimensionality and scalability for large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it is well-suited for high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset tags. It is also scalable to large datasets using CPU, and can handle the characteristics of the dataset effectively. Although there are some weaknesses regarding noisy data, the other models either are not well-matched to the dataset type or are less suitable for CPU-based computations.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is chosen because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. It is also scalable to large datasets, which is appropriate for the large data size tag. While it has a weakness with CPU-based computation, its other strengths such as handling sparse and imbalanced data make it a suitable choice compared to other models in the list, particularly since the dataset is high-dimensional and tabular.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it is strong with tabular data and accommodates high dimensionality, matching the dataset's characteristics. It performs well with large datasets and high memory, and has a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's requirement for CPU utilization. While it does have a weakness with CPU usage, AutoEncoder's strengths align more closely with the dataset properties compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is selected because it is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. It can handle noisy data efficiently and is scalable to large datasets, despite requiring a CPU. Although it performs better with a GPU, it still is efficient with the support for high memory and short training time, making it a suitable choice for the given dataset context.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the best choice because it can handle large, high-dimensional tabular datasets, which fits well with the dataset properties provided. Despite the additional CPU requirement noted in the dataset tags, AutoEncoder is preferred because its strengths include scalability to large datasets and suitability for high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the provided dataset. While AutoEncoder typically prefers GPU, its strength in tabular data and scaling ability makes it the most suitable option given the dataset specifics.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it effectively handles high dimensionality, tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset properties. Although it performs better with a GPU, it can still handle CPU usage, unlike other models with more significant CPU weaknesses. While ALAD also handles high dimensionality and tabular data well, it is not suitable for CPU usage. AE1SVM's compatibility with tabular data and scalability make it the most suitable choice for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this task due to its strengths in handling large tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It also offers scalability to large datasets and short training time, which are beneficial for CPU-based implementations despite its general preference for GPU. While it might have weaknesses with CPU, the strengths align well with the dataset requirements compared to other models on the list.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, consists of tabular data, and has high dimensionality. While AutoEncoder requires a GPU for optimal performance, it is well-suited for handling high-dimensional tabular data, and it can efficiently scale to large datasets with a short training time, addressing the dataset's high dimensionality requirement. Despite its weakness with CPU-based implementations, the strengths of AutoEncoder in handling such dataset characteristics outweigh this downside in scenarios where a GPU can be made available.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is most suitable for the given dataset because it handles high-dimensional tabular data efficiently and scales well to large datasets. It also features short training time and supports high memory with the use of a GPU, which aligns well with the requirement to cope with a large, high-dimensional CPU-compatible dataset. Although it has a weakness when CPU is required during training, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and large data sizes, especially in the tabular form, make it the best fit from the provided list of models.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is best suited for the given dataset because it effectively handles high-dimensional and tabular data, aligns well with the dataset's large size, and is scalable to large datasets. Although it's best on GPU, its ability to tackle high-dimensionality and tabular data makes it a good choice when considering CPU constraints. Additionally, it is known for its short training time, catering well to the requirement of computational efficiency.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it supports large, high-dimensional tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which is critical given the dataset's 'large' size and 'high dimensionality' tags. Additionally, AutoEncoder handles noisy data well, making it a suitable choice for data in the agriculture domain. While not optimized for CPU, it compensates with short training time and scalability.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice because it effectively handles tabular data with high dimensionality and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset properties. Additionally, it offers short training times leveraging GPU, which aligns well with the requirement to use CPU, as it can still perform without explicitly needing CPU-dependent models. Despite its weakness in CPU, its strengths in handling large, high-dimensional tabular data make it a preferable option over other models with more significant negatives for the given dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset consists of large tabular data with high dimensionality, and there is a requirement to run on a CPU. Among the models listed, the AutoEncoder is particularly suitable due to its strength in handling high dimensionality and tabular data. Although it mentions a weakness with running on CPUs, there are implementations that can leverage CPU performance effectively without requiring GPUs. Additionally, the AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets, which perfectly aligns with the dataset properties provided.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it is strong with tabular data and handles high dimensionality well, which aligns with the dataset properties. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which is crucial given the large data size. While it requires a GPU, its ability to manage high dimensionality and scalability outweighs the weakness regarding CPU usage.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the provided dataset properties. It supports tabular data and high dimensionality, both of which are central characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's large size. Although it has a weakness in CPU compatibility, its strength in handling tabular, high-dimensional data and scalability makes it the optimal choice among the available models for this agricultural dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, both of which are characteristics of the provided dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the 'large' data size tag. While the dataset requires a CPU implementation, and AutoEncoder is listed as having a weakness when used with CPUs, its overall alignment with other dataset properties like high dimensionality and scalability makes it the best choice from the given model list.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which matches the characteristics of the given dataset. It is known for handling noisy data effectively and has scalable abilities suitable for large datasets. Although it typically benefits from GPU, it can still perform acceptably given the high dimensionality capability. While other models like VAE also support high dimensional tabular data, AutoEncoder is more specifically tailored for scalable applications with short training times, making it a suitable choice under CPU constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the best choice because it supports high dimensionality and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets, and although it prefers GPU, it can still leverage high-dimensional data effectively with CPU constraints. Its strengths in short training time and scalability suit the given requirement, making it better suited compared to models like ALAD or AutoEncoder, which have CPU weaknesses, or VAE and other models with specific limitations in tabular data handling or scalability.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is chosen because it handles tabular data well, is capable of processing high-dimensional data, and can scale to large datasets. It offers short training times and is designed for GPU usage, which suits the dataset's characteristics of large size and high dimensionality. Despite its weakness for CPU, its strengths align well with the dataset properties, making it the most suitable choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice because it supports tabular data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It also handles high dimensionality well, aligns with the dataset's large size, and is scalable to large datasets. While the requirement mentions CPU, AutoEncoder's ability to handle high memory and short training time can still be an advantage when balanced against other models which might not support tabular data or have long training times despite being scalable.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for the provided dataset characteristics. It excels with tabular data and high-dimensional data, which are key properties of the dataset in question. Furthermore, AutoEncoder can handle large datasets efficiently and has a short training time, making it feasible for CPU environments when memory is available. Despite its weakness in CPU usage, its strengths align well with other dataset requirements and domain emphasis on agriculture and scalability.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality. The AutoEncoder model is suitable because it can handle high-dimensional, large datasets and is optimized for tabular data. While it prefers GPU, it can still be used effectively on a CPU for large datasets despite some weaknesses noted. Its strengths include high dimensionality, the ability to handle large datasets, and tabular data, making it the best fit from the list of options.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it is effective with large, high-dimensional tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which meets the additional requirement of being efficient on a CPU. While it has a minor weakness with CPU use, the strengths align well with the dataset's needs, particularly in handling high-dimensional tabular data with the potential for noisy data.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is a suitable choice because it handles tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset's data type. It is capable of processing high-dimensional data, aligns with the dataset's characteristic of high dimensionality, and is scalable to large datasets. Although it is generally optimized for GPU rather than CPU, none of the listed models specifically favor CPU processing, making it a compromise choice while addressing the other priority requirements like data type and dimension handling.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is a suitable choice given the dataset properties. It is well-suited for handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, AutoEncoder can work well with large datasets, leveraging its scalability and short training time. Although it is optimized for GPU usage, it aligns more closely with the dataset's requirements compared to other models, which exhibit CPU incompatibility or other characteristics misaligned with tabular data and high dimensionality.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is best suited for tabular data with high dimensionality and large data size, which matches the dataset characteristics. Despite being GPU-focused, it aligns well with the requirement of being scalable to large datasets. Its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data make it the most appropriate choice from the given models.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the best choice for the given dataset properties as it supports tabular data and high dimensionality. It is scalable to large datasets and exhibits strengths in handling noisy data, which aligns with the characteristics of the dataset. Although one of its weaknesses is CPU compatibility, its other strengths outweigh this limitation, and it provides a short training time and efficient GPU utilization suitable for large agricultural datasets with high dimensionality.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality, which matches well with the strengths of AutoEncoder. It supports high dimensionality, tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets with a short training time. Although it performs better with a GPU, it can still be suitable given the CPU requirement. Its scalability and capability to handle high dimensionality make it the best choice among the provided models.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, consists of tabular data, and has high dimensionality, all of which align perfectly with the strengths of AutoEncoder. AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets, works well with high-dimensional and tabular data, and has a short training time, which is advantageous for practical implementation. Additionally, while the dataset prefers CPU usage, AutoEncoder's strengths in other critical areas make it the best overall fit among the given options.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is a suitable choice for this dataset because it supports tabular data and handles high dimensionality well, aligning with the dataset properties. It is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which is ideal given the requirement of using a CPU and managing large data efficiently. Although it has a weakness for CPU, this is typical for models of this type, but it does excel in other necessary areas for this agricultural tabular dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, handles high dimensionality efficiently, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset properties. It also offers quick training times on GPUs, which suits the additional requirement for CPU processing as it implies a preference for models that are not resource-intensive. Despite CPU not being a strength, the AutoEncoder's compatibility with large datasets and tabular data outweighs this drawback compared to other models that do not support tabular data as effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected as it handles tabular data well, supports high dimensionality, and is suitable for large datasets, which matches the dataset properties provided. Although it primarily requires GPU, its ability to process high dimensional and noisy data efficiently with a short training time makes it a strong candidate given the requirement for CPU resources and a large dataset size. The other models have either limitations with CPU usage or issues with tabular data that make them less suitable choices.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. It has strengths in handling noisy data and is scalable to large datasets, making it appropriate for the given 'large' data size. Although it typically prefers GPU, its capability with tabular data and short training time make it a strong fit given the requirement of working with CPU eventually.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it effectively handles tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which is suitable given the 'large' dataset size. Although it prefers GPU, its strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality outweigh its CPU weakness in this context.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It also performs well on large datasets and is scalable, which is necessary given the large data size. While it has weaknesses related to CPU usage, its strengths align more closely with the dataset properties compared to other models on the list, especially given the need for handling high dimensionality data efficiently.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset consists of large tabular data with high dimensionality which is suitable for an AutoEncoder. AutoEncoder's strengths include handling tabular data and high dimensionality, and it's scalable to large datasets which aligns well with the dataset's large size. While one of its weaknesses is CPU, the dataset's requirement for CPU is an issue; however, given the other constraints and strengths, it provides a reasonable balance given the other model options available.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it excels in handling large, high-dimensional datasets and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also performs well with noisy data, a potential concern in agriculture-related data, and can efficiently run on large datasets. Although it typically requires a GPU for optimal performance, these strengths outweigh its CPU limitation, making it the best choice among the available models for the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is best suited because it supports tabular, high-dimensional data, which aligns with the dataset's high dimensionality characteristic. It also handles noisy data well, despite the negative on CPU optimization. It is scalable to large datasets, which is crucial for the large data size requirement. Additionally, it offers a short training time, making it practical given the computational constraints associated with CPU usage.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AE1SVM model is suitable for the dataset because it effectively handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it scales well to large datasets, which aligns with the large data size tag. While it has weaknesses related to CPU usage, it does not mention it being unusable on CPUs, making it a feasible choice among the options provided. Other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, ALAD, and AutoEncoder either underperform on tabular data or have a higher affinity for GPU processing, which is less compatible with the requirement for CPU use.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, high-dimensional, tabular, and requires CPU compatibility. The AutoEncoder model strongly handles high-dimensional and tabular data, as well as scalable to large datasets, making it a suitable option. Although AutoEncoder has weaknesses with CPU requirements, its strengths in handling the dataset's other characteristics make it the most suitable choice among the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for the dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and scalability to large datasets, which are key attributes of the dataset. Additionally, it offers short training times and can process noisy data efficiently, making it a good fit for the agricultural domain. While its weakness includes needing a CPU, no specific CPU requirement heavily impacts its computational strengths on large datasets in this context.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected as it caters to the dataset's properties of being large, tabular, and high dimensional. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets with short training time. Despite its requirement for GPU, it aligns well with the dataset's high dimensionality and agriculture domain, making it a suitable choice for the given constraints and strengths needed.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it is strong in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is also scalable to large datasets, which is crucial given the large data size requirement. Although it has weaknesses in CPU usage, its strengths in the relevant areas make it the most suitable choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data exceptionally well, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets and can efficiently utilize high memory, both of which are crucial given the large data size and high dimensionality. Despite its weakness in CPU usage, compared to the other models, it also performs adequately with conditions favoring GPU, thus offering a reasonable balance considering the variations in model capabilities.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: lympho\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"medical\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"low-signal data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\", \"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it aligns well with the dataset characteristics and requirements. The dataset is medium-sized tabular data from the medical domain, characterized by low-signal data and requiring low memory and CPU compatibility. AE1SVM is strong in handling tabular and medical data, and it's compatible with high dimensionality and imbalanced data, which is beneficial given the low-signal nature of the dataset. Although it has a weakness in terms of CPU and low memory, it aligns more closely with the dataset requirements than other models, offering short training time and scalability to larger datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data and falls within the medical domain. It can handle medium-sized datasets effectively and is known for its short training time, which aligns with the requirement for low memory usage on a CPU. While VAE is generally better suited for GPU processing, its compatibility with tabular and healthcare data without being heavily reliant on noisy data makes it the best option given the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also functions effectively on low-dimensional datasets and processes sparse and imbalanced data well, which might align with the 'low-signal data' characteristic. Additionally, LUNAR offers scalability and requires short training time, meeting the low memory and CPU constraints. While it might be computationally intensive, the mentioned characteristics make it the best fit among the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is a suitable choice for the given dataset properties as it is strong with tabular data, is specialized in handling high dimensional data, and is applicable in the medical domain. Despite the dataset being low-signal and medium in size, AE1SVM can manage the medium data size effectively with short training times and scalability. It is weaker when it comes to low memory and CPU, but compared to other models, it aligns more closely with the needs, especially given its strengths in handling tabular and medical data, which is essential for the problem domain.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it specifically handles tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also supports medical domain data, which aligns with the dataset's domain. While it does generally require high memory, it is still the best fit among the models listed because its strengths align well with the dataset's characteristics such as dealing with tabular data effectively and having short training time. Additionally, although it is less ideal on CPU and low memory, it is relatively better suited for low-signal data compared to other options like VAE and AutoEncoder, which have weaknesses in handling low-signal data in CPU environments.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is a suitable choice for this dataset as it handles tabular data effectively, which aligns with the dataset's medium size and tabular data type. It also supports low-dimensional datasets, which benefits low-signal data. Although LUNAR is computationally intensive and sensitive to hyperparameters, it is CPU-friendly and suitable for low-memory conditions, meeting the additional requirements. Other models in the list either have weaknesses related to low-memory situations or don't adequately support tabular data under these constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is a suitable choice because it supports tabular data and is applied in healthcare domains, which matches the dataset's medical domain. Despite requiring a GPU for best performance, it suits medium-sized data and can handle low-memory constraints better than most competitors. VAE also has a short training time with capabilities for high dimensionality and limited noisy data; these characteristics help accommodate the low-signal data noted in the dataset. Its weaknesses such as requiring high memory and preference for GPU are less concerning with acceptable hardware adjustments. While CPU preference is noted, none of the models perfectly fit all criteria, and VAE aligns most closely with the critical dataset characteristics and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular medical data with low signal and low memory requirements. Among the models, AutoEncoder has strengths in tabular data, healthcare, and high-dimensional datasets, which suits the domain and data type well. Although it's typically better suited to GPUs and may prefer higher memory, it has a short training time and can scale to large datasets, making it adaptable to medium-sized data on CPUs with optimized settings.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected for the medical domain with tabular data and its particular suitability for handling imbalanced data and sparse data. Despite AE1SVM's requirement for GPU, which conflicts with the CPU tag in dataset requirements, it overall aligns better with medium data size and tabular data characteristic. Although AE1SVM requires high memory and is weak for CPU use, its strength in medical and tabular data fields outweighs other models, like AutoEncoder or VAE, which are weak with CPU usage and low-signal data. This model also features short training time and good scalability, which supports use in medium-sized datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and in the medical domain, with additional requirements for CPU usage and low memory. VAE supports tabular data, healthcare applications, and can handle high dimensionality, which is beneficial given the medical domain context. While VAE typically prefers GPU and high memory, its strengths align more closely with the dataset's characteristics compared to other models. Furthermore, VAE can work with short training times which may help with the low memory requirement, making it a better option for this dataset than alternatives like AutoEncoder or Deep SVDD, which have noted weaknesses in low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for tabular data and medical domains which align with the dataset characteristics. It handles medium-sized data well and supports tabular datasets, which fits the requirement of the dataset properties. Additionally, it does well with high dimensionality, which can be associated with tabular medical data. Although it typically prefers GPU and high memory, it remains one of the few options accommodating tabular data in a medical context from the model list, despite some challenges with CPU and low memory efficiency.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational AutoEncoder) is the most suitable model for this dataset as it supports tabular data and has strengths in the medical domain. Although it generally requires high memory and prefers a GPU, it can handle low memory scenarios with optimized configurations. Additionally, it offers short training times making it feasible for medium-sized datasets. Despite its weakness in CPU deployment, its ability to adapt to tabular data and suitability for healthcare domains makes it a good fit for the dataset's properties while aligning with the model's strengths in handling tabular and healthcare data.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it handles tabular data well, which matches the dataset type. It also has strengths in the medical domain, which is relevant, and can deal with high dimensionality. Despite its weaknesses in terms of CPU and low memory, it offers scalable solutions for medium-sized datasets with a potentially low signal. While not the absolute perfect fit, it's the best choice considering the available models and the given dataset requirements for working on a CPU system with low memory.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and medical, which aligns well with AE1SVM's strengths in handling tabular data and medical domains. Although it requires high memory, which was not preferred, it operates well with CPU, which satisfies the additional requirement. The model is also capable of dealing with high dimensionality and sparse data, making it a strong candidate considering the characteristics of low-signal data. Overall, AE1SVM meets more of the requirements and conditions than the other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It is suitable for healthcare applications present in the medical domain tag. Although it favors GPU and high memory, VAE is often more versatile and can be adapted for CPU with careful optimizations. Importantly, VAE's strengths in handling tabular data and healthcare overshadow its limitations regarding low-signal data. Other models, such as AE1SVM and ALAD, were not ideal due to their weaknesses in CPU optimization, which is a requirement here. Despite VAE's weaknesses in CPU optimization, its strengths align more closely with the dataset properties compared to other options.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data and is also suitable for healthcare-related datasets, aligning with the medical domain of the dataset. Although it generally prefers GPU and high memory, it is more suitable than the alternatives given the constraints of using a CPU and low memory. Other models either lack support for tabular data, have significant weaknesses in low-signal data, or require resources not aligned with CPU preference.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is most suitable given the dataset properties. It supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. AutoEncoder also excels in handling medium-sized datasets, has medical domain expertise, short training time, and can deal with low-signal data. Although it prefers a GPU environment, the requirement for low memory can be managed by adjusting the model's size or using a CPU at the cost of increased training time.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it supports tabular data and is relevant in the medical domain, which aligns with the characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it works well with high dimensionality and can handle imbalanced data effectively. Although AE1SVM typically requires high memory and GPU, its ability to manage tabular data and the domain suitability make it the best choice. The requirement to run it on CPU and low memory is a weakness, but given the options, it offers the best compromise considering the low-signal nature of the dataset compared to the other models available.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular data with applications in healthcare, and is effective even with low-signal datasets. While it has strengths related to GPU use, its short training time aligns with low memory requirements if the training data is efficiently batched. While it is typically favorable for high-dimensionality datasets, it is generally suited for tabular medical data when signal strength is low, contrasting with other models that either have high memory demands or are tailored primarily for noisy data or data types not tied to this dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and is used in healthcare domains, matching the dataset's medical domain and tabular data type characteristics. It also has a short training time and can be efficient with high dimensionality, suitable for low-signal data tasks. Although it is generally suited for GPU, with medium data size and a need for efficiency on CPU and low memory, VAE is closer to meeting the overall requirements compared to other models that have higher memory and CPU usage issues.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is best suited for the dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and the medical domain, both of which are present in the dataset. It is capable of managing high dimensionality and maintains good performance with sparse and imbalanced data. Additionally, it uses GPUs efficiently but its consideration of high memory could be countered with efficient memory management. While it is not optimal for CPU or low memory settings, it aligns best with the needs for tabular and medical data within CPU constraints better than the other available models, given the strengths it brings in other critical areas.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected as the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type, and is applicable in the medical domain. It is adept at handling high dimensionality, which can be beneficial for medical datasets. Despite the model's weakness for low memory, it generally offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which aligns with the requirement for CPU usage and low memory. Additionally, its strengths in handling tabular data and medical data conform to the key attributes of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model, given the dataset characteristics and requirements. It effectively handles tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Despite its weaknesses in high memory and being computationally intensive, it has strengths in handling low-dimensional datasets and imbalanced data, which could complement the low-signal nature of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR supports CPU usage and does not demand high memory, aligning with the specified constraints. Its short training time and scalability to large datasets are additional advantages.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for medium-sized tabular data in the medical domain. It excels with high-dimensional, sparse, and imbalanced data, and is designed to work with CPU constraints. Despite the dataset's low-signal data characteristic, its ability to handle tabular data alongside its short training time makes it the optimal choice, especially when considering the requirement for low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is highly suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset's primary characteristic, and it also has strengths in healthcare. Despite being typically used with GPUs, VAE has an advantage in handling low-signal data effectively due to its ability to model complex relationships in the data. While it is typically paired with high memory, this model's ability to work well with medium-sized datasets and the absence of scalability constraints make it a suitable choice for the given low-memory requirement when balanced with careful resource management.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the data type of this dataset. It is also strong in the medical domain, which corresponds to the dataset's domain. Although it requires high memory, it is suitable for medium-sized datasets and has short training time, compensating for CPU and low memory limitations. Other models like AnoGAN and DevNet are limited by their unfavorable interactions with tabular data and low-signal data, respectively. Further, AE1SVM's capability to handle sparse and imbalanced data adds an advantage, despite potential issues with small data size, making it the best fit from the list provided.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it handles tabular data and is suitable for the medical domain, as specified in the dataset characteristics. Although it has a weakness concerning small data size and CPU usage, it does work well with tabular and medical datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. Despite its high memory requirement, it provides a balance between the needs of handling imbalanced and sparse data and also offers relatively fast training time compared to others, ideal for medium-sized datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is chosen because it specifically supports tabular data, which fits the dataset type. It is also suitable for medical domain data and handles high dimensionality well, addressing the dataset's characteristics of being in the medical field and potentially having a complex feature space. Although AE1SVM typically utilizes GPU, it can be adapted for CPU usage due to its short training time; however, memory limitations could be improved with appropriate preprocessing or feature selection. Importantly, it supports low-signal data compared to some other models in the list, making it a good candidate for the given dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset as it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics of medium size and tabular data type. It shows strengths in handling tabular data, imbalanced data, and medical domain requirements, which are important given the dataset is medical-related with low-signal characteristics. Although it has a weakness with low memory, amongst the available models, it has fewer weaknesses directly conflicting with the requirements of 'CPU' and 'low memory'. Additionally, it can handle high dimensionality, which might be a factor in the dataset given its medical nature. Despite this, its short training time and scalability make it a better choice when using limited memory resources on a CPU as compared to other models with overlapping weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset's properties. It is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Despite its higher memory requirements, it is effective for medical data and tabular data while being capable of handling high-dimensional datasets, which is beneficial given the medium data size and low-signal characteristics. Although not optimal for low memory and CPU, it still strikes a better balance with the given constraints compared to the other models, which have more significant weaknesses related to key dataset features or requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, works well in the medical domain, and handles medium-sized datasets efficiently. Although it requires high memory and is optimized for GPU, it has a short training time which is beneficial considering the dataset's CPU and low memory constraints. It effectively addresses sparse and imbalanced data, making it a good fit for low-signal characteristics without significantly impacting performance.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which is a critical characteristic of the dataset. The VAE model also aligns with the domain requirements as it has proven strengths in healthcare, making it appropriate for the medical domain of this dataset. Although VAE typically requires a GPU and high memory, its short training time and scalability to large datasets fit well within medium-sized data constraints. Despite its weakness in CPU environments, its proficiency in handling tabular data and medical domain data makes it the most suitable choice from the provided model list.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets, particularly in the medical domain, which matches the dataset's characteristics. While it faces challenges with small data sizes and CPU requirements, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets make it the most compatible option for the dataset properties provided. Additionally, it performs well with sparse and imbalanced data, making it versatile for various medical data patterns.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it supports tabular data and is applicable in the medical domain, both of which are key characteristics of the dataset. Despite the requirement for low memory, AE1SVM's strengths include high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets, which can counterbalance memory limitations as it does not specify requiring GPU or high memory in the dataset tags. Additionally, it has a short training time, aligning well with the CPU-driven requirement. It can handle imbalanced and sparse data, which may be present in medical datasets, even though it is not explicitly low-signal data oriented.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is specifically noted for its strengths in healthcare applications and can handle high dimensionality and noisy data. Although VAE prefers a GPU and high memory, it has a short training time, making it feasible for use with medium-sized datasets using CPU. The key strengths match the dataset's properties in the medical domain while handling low-signal data effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is chosen because it supports tabular data and is strong in the medical domain. It handles imbalanced data and is suited for high-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset's low-signal characteristic. Despite its weakness with small data size, AE1SVM can manage medium-sized datasets and efficiently run on CPUs, which is necessary given the constraints of low memory and CPU usage.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset indicates medium-sized, low-signal, tabular medical data with CPU and low memory requirements. LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and performs well on low-dimensional datasets and sparse data. It also offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's medium size and computational constraints, even though it primarily benefits from a GPU. Therefore, LUNAR strikes a balance between the dataset properties and the strengths of available models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset characteristics. It handles tabular data and is specifically strong in the medical domain, which matches the dataset's domain. Although AE1SVM has some weaknesses related to CPU usage and low memory conditions, it can effectively handle medium-sized datasets and tabular data, which are critical factors for this selection. Other models, like VAE and AutoEncoder, have strengths in similar domains but have weaknesses regarding CPU usage, which makes AE1SVM a more balanced choice given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is best suited for this task because it demonstrates strengths in handling tabular data within the medical domain, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Even though AE1SVM generally requires high memory, it accommodates tabular data and has short training times, both reinforcing its suitability given the medium data size and the need for CPU compatibility. The model also supports high dimensionality, which could be advantageous for capturing complex patterns within the low-signal data, albeit on a CPU, making it the most compatible option compared to others on the list.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it caters to the characteristics of medium-sized and tabular medical datasets well, despite the low-signal nature. It is explicitly designed for tabular data and excels in the medical domain. While it generally requires high memory, its strengths in handling tabular and imbalanced data, relevant to the medical domain, makes it a suitable choice, despite some memory constraints. Moreover, its short training time fits the requirement for a model that can be efficiently run on a CPU, considering additional CPU and low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is a good fit for medium-sized tabular data in the medical domain, matching the dataset characteristics. Despite a low-signal data weakness, it excels in high dimensionality, tabular, and medical data, utilizes CPU efficiently, and accommodates low memory usage. Although it prefers high memory and GPU, its strengths align better with the dataset compared to alternatives, providing a balanced trade-off.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset since it is capable of handling tabular data effectively and has strengths in the medical domain. Although it requires high memory and a GPU, which contradicts some requirements, it excels in short training time and scalability to large datasets, which can offset some low memory issues. Its capability to manage imbalanced and sparse data also makes it a good fit for the medium-sized medical dataset with low signal characteristics, aligning closely with the strengths needed for this type of data.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset and requirements. The dataset is medium-sized and involves tabular data within the medical domain, which aligns well with the strengths of AutoEncoders. Although AutoEncoders typically require high memory, this consideration is less severe given the dataset's medium size. While they are generally not optimal for low-signal data, their compatibility with tabular data and healthcare, coupled with efficient processing on a GPU, makes them a viable choice. Additionally, the efficient model training time and scalability further support its selection despite CPU and low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It supports tabular data, which aligns with the data type, and can handle low-dimensional datasets, which is appropriate given the low-signal data characteristic. Additionally, it requires a CPU and offers short training time, which matches the additional requirements of low memory usage. Other models either do not fit the 'low memory' or 'CPU' requirement well or have larger weaknesses for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is a suitable choice for this dataset as it is well-suited for tabular data in the medical domain. It handles high dimensionality effectively, which is beneficial given the dataset characteristics. Although it is typically GPU-based, its short training time can offset CPU requirements to some extent. Among the available options, it is the most compatible choice given the model's balance of strengths and weaknesses with respect to the dataset's low-signal limitations and medium size.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this use case because it handles tabular data and medical domain applications well, aligning with the dataset properties. It supports high dimensionality and can process medium-sized datasets, making it a good fit for low-signal data contexts. While it is sometimes CPU-bound and requires high memory, its advantages in handling tabular medical data overrule these concerns given the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a suitable choice for this medium-sized tabular medical dataset because it can handle tabular data, is applicable in healthcare, and manages high dimensionality. Additionally, VAE is proficient with noisy data and has short training times. Though the model generally prefers GPU, it can run on a CPU if execution time is not the primary concern. Despite its weaknesses with CPU and low memory, it aligns best with the primary dataset requirements compared to other models that either require GPU exclusively or struggle with low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and the medical domain, aligning with the dataset properties. Although it typically requires a GPU, VAE can handle the 'low-signal data' effectively due to its strengths in high dimensionality and noise-handling. While VAE usually leverages high memory, among the available options, it strikes a balance with the requirement for low memory usage. Other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, and AutoEncoder share more weaknesses in areas important to this dataset, such as handling tabular data or low memory. Additionally, VAE offers relatively short training times and scalability to larger datasets, which fits well with a medium-sized dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable due to its strengths in handling tabular data and its applicability in the medical domain. Although it requires high memory and typically uses a GPU, it is designed to work with high dimensional data, which can help in addressing the low-signal nature of the dataset. AE1SVM also handles sparse and imbalanced data well, which aligns with the dataset characteristics mentioned. While low memory is a requirement, the strengths of AE1SVM outweigh this weakness, making it a favorable choice given the context and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is best suited for tabular data and can handle low-dimensional datasets with sparse and imbalanced characteristics, aligning well with the dataset's properties. It is also scalable to large datasets, has short training time, and does not require high memory, which is ideal given the additional CPU and low memory requirements. Although LUNAR's weaknesses include noisy data and high memory, these are less of a concern given that the dataset is low-signal and medium-sized, focusing on the need for efficient management of computational resources.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: ionosphere\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"small\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"technology\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"low-signal data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It handles tabular data well, which matches the dataset type. It also has strengths in working with sparse and imbalanced data, which could be advantageous given the low-signal data characteristic. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time and scales to large datasets, which can help manage resource constraints such as low memory. Although LUNAR has high memory as a weakness, it still aligns better with the dataset tags compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset comprises small tabular low-signal data with a low memory constraint. Among the model list, VAE is most suited due to its strengths in handling tabular data and technology domain features, despite requiring high memory, which is a trade-off given that small data size may offset this requirement. VAE is noted for its adaptability to tabular and high-dimensional data, both relevant here, and offers a short training time that aligns with low-resource constraints better than other options.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Among the given models, VAE has strengths that align most closely with the dataset properties. It supports tabular data and is applicable in the technology domain. Additionally, VAE has a short training time, which is advantageous for small datasets. Although it generally requires high memory, other models have more significant weaknesses related to small data size or low memory requirements, making VAE the most suitable choice considering the trade-offs.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and small datasets, which matches the dataset properties of being small and tabular in nature. It also provides the benefit of short training time and scalability to large datasets if needed, aligning with the low memory requirement. While it may have high memory weaknesses, other models either have more weaknesses or do not match the dataset's characteristics as well as LUNAR. It also does not have the weakness of 'low-signal data' like other models, making it a more viable option given the current dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It specifically handles tabular data well and performs efficiently with low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the 'small' data size tag. Despite its high memory weakness, LUNAR's strengths in tabular data, imbalanced data management, and short training time make it preferable for low-signal data requiring low memory.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for this scenario as it supports tabular data, performs well in the technology domain, and is efficient with high dimensional and noisy data despite its high memory requirement. While it is generally more effective with larger datasets, its strengths align better with the given dataset properties (small tabular data, technology domain) than the other models, which have greater weaknesses such as poor performance on tabular data or small datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset's characteristics. It has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and works well with low-dimensional datasets, aligning with the small data size tag. It also meets the additional requirement of low memory usage with its short training time, despite having a general weakness of high memory. It doesn't have weaknesses directly conflicting with low-signal data, unlike other models, making it a more balanced choice overall.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags. It also has strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data without requiring high memory, fitting the additional requirement of low memory. Additionally, LUNAR has short training times, making it efficient for small datasets. Despite its weaknesses like sensitivity to hyperparameters, it doesn't conflict significantly with the dataset characteristics given.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for small tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags indicating a 'small' data size and 'tabular data'. LUNAR also benefits from short training times, which aligns with the 'low memory' requirement. Although LUNAR has high memory as a weakness, its strengths in managing tabular and low-dimensional data make it more suitable than other options given the constraints on the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data and technology domains. It can handle high-dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite its weakness for small data size and low-signal data, it has strengths in short training time and scalability, making it appropriate even for small datasets. This model, although not perfect given the low-signal and small size context, provides a reasonable balance of strengths that fit the given constraints better than others in this list.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small sized, tabular, technology-focused, and low-signal, with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is suitable for tabular and technology datasets, and offers short training times. Although VAE typically requires high memory, its strengths in handling noisy data and high dimensionality align well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its higher memory requirement, it is the best match among the available models given its strengths in relevant data types and domain, and its capability to work well even when the signal is low.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model when considering the given dataset properties. It is strong with tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type, and although it isn't specified for small data sets, its ability to handle low-dimensional datasets and short training time makes it a viable candidate given the low memory requirement. Moreover, while other models struggle with the small data size characteristic of the dataset, LUNAR doesn't explicitly list this as a weakness. It avoids the weaknesses that align directly with the dataset properties and additional requirements, such as low memory and low signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, and imbalanced data, making it a good fit for the low-signal tabular data in the technology domain. Although it requires high memory, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's low memory requirement and small size constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it specifically lists tabular data as a strength aligning well with the dataset type. It also handles imbalanced data and does not have a weakness related to low memory, which addresses the additional requirements. Although it has no specific strength for small datasets, its strengths in handling tabular and sparse data with short training time provide a balanced approach given the low-signal characteristic and the need to accommodate small data size indirectly.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and constraints. It is designed for tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and is specifically suited for low-dimensional datasets, aligning with the 'low-signal data' characteristic. Additionally, LUNAR has efficient memory usage which is vital given the 'low memory' requirement, and it has a short training time, allowing for rapid iterations on small datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for small tabular datasets and the technology domain, which matches the dataset properties. Despite its requirement for high memory, which might be a concern, it addresses the characteristics of low memory better than models like AutoEncoder and AE1SVM, which have weaknesses specifically in this area. VAE also handles tabular data well and has a short training time, making it a suitable choice given the dataset's additional low memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice because it handles tabular data effectively, aligns with technological domains, and is capable of processing low-dimensional datasets like our small data. Additionally, it has a short training time and operates well under GPU processing, which can mitigate potential high memory requirements despite its computational intensiveness. LUNAR specifically lacks weaknesses associated with small data size or low memory, making it a better fit compared to other models which either struggle with small datasets or have significant memory usage concerns.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is selected because it explicitly lists 'tabular data' as a strength, aligns well with 'technology' domain, and can handle 'low-signal data' through its robust feature learning capabilities. Although it has high memory requirements, it fits better than other options as they either are negatively impacted by the 'small data size' or 'low memory'. VAE's strength in handling 'tabular data' and usability in the 'technology' domain, while having a relatively short training time, makes it the most reasonable model considering the task's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and the technology domain, which matches the dataset. It has strengths in handling tabular data and can manage low-signal data issues better than other models in the list. Although it requires more memory, VAE compensates with a short training time and robustness to noisy data, aligning with the requirement for low memory usage and addressing the challenges presented by the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice for this dataset, which is small, consists of tabular data, and belongs to the technology domain. Its strengths in handling tabular data, short training times, and scalable processing make it a strong candidate. Despite requiring high memory, which conflicts with the 'low memory' requirement, it balances well with other dataset properties and characterized model weaknesses compared to other models. The other models either explicitly list 'small data size' and 'low-signal data' as weaknesses or do not sufficiently align with the domain and data type needs.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It handles sparse and imbalanced data well and has a short training time, which is important for low memory environments. Although it requires high memory and is computationally intensive, its strengths with tabular data and scalability make it the most suitable choice among the provided models given the dataset's constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is specifically designed to handle tabular data, which matches the dataset's type. It can handle low-dimensional datasets effectively, and it has strengths in technology domains. Additionally, it requires short training time and low memory, which aligns with the requirement for low memory and the characteristics of the small dataset size. Despite its weaknesses in noisy data and high memory, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the best choice given the dataset properties. It is specifically noted for its strengths in handling tabular data and technology domains, both of which match the dataset tags. Despite being slightly memory-intensive, VAE has short training times which are beneficial for small datasets. Its capability to work well with low-signal data and general robustness in technology-related applications make it the most suitable choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which is the data type of the dataset, and its applicability in the technology domain. Despite its high memory requirement, it performs well with noisy data and short training time, which could be beneficial given the low-signal characteristic of the dataset. While not ideal for small datasets, it offers more relevant strengths for the dataset requirements compared to the other models.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and technology domains, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Although it typically requires high memory, its strengths include a short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it capable of handling low memory requirements with appropriate adjustments. Despite its weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data, the dataset's characteristics of low-signal data make VAE a more robust choice among the available models, as it handles tabular data well and can be adapted for low-memory use cases.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, its efficient performance on low-dimensional datasets, and its capability of operating under constraints of short training time and scalability to large datasets. The model's adaptable architecture is advantageous given the requirement for low memory usage, and it can address the low-signal nature of the dataset better than the alternatives.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for the given dataset as it supports tabular data and is applicable in the technology domain, which aligns with the dataset requirements. Despite the dataset being small and the data characterized as low-signal, VAE does not have specific weaknesses that conflict significantly with these properties compared to other models. While VAE requires high memory, which is a consideration, it overall handles the tabular data type present in a low-signal environment better than the other models on the list that have more critical weaknesses related to small datasets or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model due to its compatibility with tabular data and technology domain, which aligns with the dataset properties. Despite the dataset being small, VAE's strength in handling tabular data with efficient training time makes it a better fit compared to others. Additionally, VAE operates well with low-signal data and requires low memory, addressing the additional requirements of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and requirements. It supports tabular data and is effective in technology domains, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its weaknesses in handling small data size, it matches better than other models because it can operate with low-signal data and deals with technology-oriented domains. VAE also has the advantage of shorter training times and scalability, fitting the low memory requirements. While not perfect, it provides the best trade-offs among the models listed for this specific dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this scenario due to its strength in handling tabular data, which aligns well with the dataset properties. It also has the capability to work with low-dimensional datasets, as indicated by the dataset's 'low-signal data' characteristic. Furthermore, LUNAR has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the requirement for low memory usage. The weaknesses of LUNAR, such as high memory and computational intensity, are less impactful given other models have more severe weaknesses for small datasets and low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the dataset properties given that it supports tabular data, is relevant to the technology domain, and requires low memory. While it has some weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced datasets, these issues are less significant compared to its competitors' weaknesses in handling small data sizes, which is a significant factor in this selection process. Additionally, VAE models have a short training time, which compensates for the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it handles tabular data well, has a short training time, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags of tabular data and low-memory requirements. Additionally, LUNAR's strengths in dealing with low-dimensional datasets and its GPU capability fit the technology domain, despite the dataset's low-signal characteristics and small size. The model's minimal memory demand aligns well with the need for low memory utilization.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset. It is particularly strong with tabular data and technology-related domains, which aligns well with the given dataset tags. While VAE models typically require high memory, they are well-suited for situations with low-signal data and short training time, despite the dataset size being small, which is a general weakness of most models. Additionally, VAE supports high-dimensionality scenarios, and the requirement for low memory might not pose a significant issue given the 'small' data size.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is chosen as it handles tabular data and is suitable for the technology domain. Among the available options, it effectively deals with noisy data and achieves short training times, which helps with the low memory requirement. Although it generally requires high memory, its overall strengths align better with the dataset properties, including the ability to handle low-signal data, compared to other models which have more pronounced weaknesses with small datasets and low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's 'tabular data' tag. It also works well with low-dimensional datasets, making it appropriate for 'low-signal data', which indicates simpler patterns may be prevalent. Additionally, LUNAR supports low memory requirements, aligning with the additional requirement of 'low memory'. Although it typically uses high memory, it is more computationally optimal for small datasets compared to other models that strongly oppose low memory and small data sizes.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected due to its strengths with tabular data and technology domains, matching the dataset's characteristics. It requires low memory and has a short training time, making it suitable for small data sizes. Although its weaknesses include handling discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these do not significantly impact this dataset according to the given tags. Overall, VAE provides a good balance for low-signal data within the technology domain.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's type. It also excels with low-dimensional, sparse, and imbalanced data that could be associated with low-signal datasets. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time and is scalable, aligning well with the requirement for low memory usage. While it does not explicitly mention small data size as a strength, it does not have it as a weakness unlike other models. This makes it more suitable for the provided dataset compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model as it excels with tabular data and is capable of handling low-dimensional, sparse, and imbalanced datasets, which are relevant for the given dataset properties. It also has short training time and low memory usage, which aligns well with the need for low memory consumption.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice because it is effective with tabular data and works well with low-dimensional datasets. It also requires low memory usage and provides short training times, which fits the dataset's small size and low-memory requirement. While LUNAR may have weaknesses with high memory and being computationally intensive, its strengths align better with the dataset characteristics compared to the other models.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is chosen because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It is also suitable for technology domain applications and can work well with low-memory requirements due to its short training time. Furthermore, the VAE model can handle tabular data and is capable of managing low-signal data when well-tuned. Although it has some weaknesses like handling imbalanced or sparse data, these are not the primary concerns given the dataset's properties. Its ability to operate under constraints that are present in the dataset, such as low memory and small data size, makes it the most suitable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model because it is designed to handle tabular data and is efficient with low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the small and low-signal characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR's strengths in handling tabular data and short training time make it ideal for datasets with low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches our dataset requirements. It also caters to datasets in the technology domain, which aligns with our dataset's domain tag. Despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data, which is not specified as a concern, VAE offers short training time and is adaptable to technology data, making it a suitable choice for low-signal data on small datasets with low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data in the technology domain, which matches the dataset's attributes. Despite its classification as high memory, it has a relatively short training time, which is beneficial considering the additional low memory requirement. While the VAE generally performs well with larger datasets, it does not explicitly have weaknesses related to small data sizes like some other models, making it a more balanced choice for the current scenario. Additionally, VAEs can handle low-signal data better than other models listed, ensuring it can effectively work with the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and model characteristics. It excels with tabular data, aligns with the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset, and is capable of handling small data size effectively given its strength in low-dimensional datasets. Although it is computationally intensive, its short training time and scalability to large datasets make it a suitable candidate, especially considering the need for low memory usage in the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it specifically strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR is capable of handling low-dimensional and sparse data, which is beneficial for addressing the low-signal nature of the dataset. Despite its weaknesses in handling high memory, the short training time and scalability to large datasets make it a suitable choice given the small data size and low memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is scalable to large datasets, has a short training time, and does not have an explicit small data size weakness. Importantly, LUNAR does not have a low memory constraint, making it more suitable given the low memory requirement in the dataset tags. While it generally requires GPU and can be computationally intensive, its ability to handle tabular and low-dimensional datasets makes it a better fit compared to other models that have a weakness with small data sizes or specifically require high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is most suitable for this dataset because it supports tabular data, is favorable for the technology domain, and has short training time, which aligns well with the dataset needs. While it generally requires high memory, the dataset's small size might mitigate this issue. Despite its weakness with discrete or categorical data, the lack of emphasis on 'sparse data' or 'imbalanced data' makes VAE a better fit compared to others that have explicit weaknesses in these areas. Additionally, VAE does not have specific weaknesses related to low-signal data, unlike some other options, making it the best available choice from the given list.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Given the dataset properties, VAE is suitable due to its strengths in handling tabular data and technology domains. It is capable of managing low-signal and small datasets efficiently, despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data. Its short training time and compatibility with tabular structures make it particularly fit for a small dataset with low memory constraints. Although it doesn't handle imbalanced data well, this is not a specified issue in the dataset characteristics provided.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it is specifically suited for tabular data, which is the type of data we have. It also has the ability to handle low-dimensional datasets, which relates well to the low-signal nature of the data. Furthermore, LUNAR supports short training times and scalability, all while working under low memory conditions, aligning well with the dataset's requirements. Although LUNAR is sensitive to hyperparameters and computationally intensive, these drawbacks are less significant given the dataset's properties and the specific constraints outlined.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small, comprises tabular data, and is in the technology domain with low-signal characteristics. Most models have a weakness with small data sizes, but VAE explicitly includes strengths in managing tabular and technology-related datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's tags. Additionally, VAE has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory requirement, making it more suitable than other models that have long training times or high memory requirements. Despite its strength in high-memory environments, its ability to handle tabular data in technology and short training time makes it the best available choice from the provided list.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: wbc\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"small\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"medical\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"high dimensionality\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational AutoEncoder) is selected because it performs well with tabular data and healthcare domains, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it effectively manages high dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. While VAE generally requires high memory and is not explicitly optimized for low memory environments, among the choices, it has strengths aligned closely with the medical and tabular data context. Other models either have primary weaknesses with small datasets or insufficient support for tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset's tags. VAE also has strengths in healthcare, making it a good fit for the medical domain. While it typically requires high memory, the absence of low memory as a weakness indicates that it may perform adequately under the given constraints. Additionally, VAE offers short training times and can handle small data sizes well, making it a balanced choice for this specific context.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it is suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality and it works well in the healthcare domain. While it does require high memory, it is favorable for small data sizes with short training times. It can handle the high dimensionality characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, its robustness to noisy data and high-dimensional datasets aligns well with the dataset properties, making it the most suitable choice from the list provided.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for the given dataset as it supports tabular data, which matches the data type requirement. Additionally, it handles high dimensionality well, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Although the dataset is small, VAE has strengths in healthcare and offers short training time, which can be beneficial given the dataset's small size. The model is also able to work with noisy data and can scale efficiently to larger datasets, which provides future flexibility. While VAE does require high memory, its other strengths align closely with the dataset properties, making it the most suitable choice given the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model fits well with the dataset properties because it effectively handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which are significant characteristics of the given dataset. Additionally, it is suitable for the medical domain, providing strengths in healthcare data applications. Despite not being intrinsically optimized for small datasets, VAE's ability to work with tabular data and its compatibility with GPU for efficient computation are beneficial. Furthermore, VAE can be adapted to work with low memory settings more effectively than other models on the list. This makes it the best available choice given the dataset's properties and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and can handle high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. VAE also supports medical and healthcare domains, which is critical in this context. Despite being characterized as requiring high memory, VAE offers advantages in short training time and the ability to handle noisy data, although the memory constraint is a concern. Overall, considering the dataset's small size and tabular nature, VAE strikes a balance in handling high dimensionality and medical domain suitability.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is well-suited for tabular data and specifically addresses high dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It is also oriented towards healthcare, aligning with the medical domain of the dataset. Although VAEs typically require high memory, they offer short training times and are suitable for processing data with noise, which is relevant even if not explicitly part of the dataset tag. Despite the dataset's small size, VAE has strengths that closely match the dataset's properties better than the other models available.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also suitable for high dimensionality, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Although it has a weakness in handling imbalanced data, it does not have a specific weakness for small data sizes as mentioned for AE1SVM and others. Additionally, VAE has a short training time, which compensates for its higher memory requirement. Overall, its compatibility with healthcare and capacity to handle high dimensionality while working on tabular data makes it the most fitting choice among the models listed, considering the given dataset properties and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and can handle high dimensionality, which is a characteristic of the given dataset. Moreover, it has a short training time and is capable of dealing with noisy data, which aligns well with the medical domain in high-dimensional spaces. Although it requires high memory, this is a small dataset, so the memory requirement is less of a concern. Other models were ruled out because they either do not support tabular or small datasets effectively or require high memory, which is a constraint.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is suitable for a small dataset with tabular data in the medical domain and exhibits strengths for high dimensionality data. Although VAE has high memory requirements, it aligns well with the rest of the dataset properties, including its ability to handle high dimensionality and tabular data effectively within the healthcare domain. Moreover, it offers short training time compared to other models which makes it more viable for constrained resources.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is well-suited for small, high-dimensional tabular datasets, particularly in the medical domain. It has strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, both of which are characteristics of the dataset. While it typically requires high memory, the requirement for short training time and suitability for high-dimensional tabular data make it a strong candidate despite the dataset's small size.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for small, high-dimensional tabular medical datasets, as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data well, which matches the dataset tags provided. Although VAEs typically require high memory, this model has the advantage of short training times, which helps in situations with low memory constraints. Moreover, it does not show significant weaknesses for small data sizes compared to other models. Its capability to work with medical domains further aligns with the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is chosen because it specializes in fitting on high dimensional tabular data, which is crucial for the given dataset characteristics. It is also tailored for medical applications. Although it has weaknesses with small data sizes and low memory scenarios, compared to other models, it offers a balanced handling of the required properties, excluding small dataset handling where most models show weaknesses. It also has the advantage of short training times, which is beneficial for low memory scenarios.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is specifically strong for tabular data, which aligns well with the dataset type. It also performs well with high dimensionality, a characteristic of the dataset. While it is not as strong with small data sizes due to its computational intensity, it promises short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it efficient once appropriately configured within its strengths.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected because it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which align with the dataset characteristics. It also has strengths in the medical domain and has a short training time, which is beneficial for small datasets. While it typically uses high memory, its strength in handling high dimensionality and scalability makes it the most suitable choice given the dataset's high dimensionality and low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) aligns well with the dataset's properties: it is suitable for tabular data and is often used in healthcare domains, making it relevant for medical data. It can handle high dimensionality, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Despite its higher memory usage, VAE's strengths in short training time and ability to handle noisy data make it a viable candidate, especially given the low memory requirement constraint. Most other models either struggle with tabular data, have issues with small datasets, or require high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it is one of the few models strong in tabular data, healthcare, and high dimensionality, which aligns well with the given dataset properties. Despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data, VAE offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets while being suitable for the medical domain. It is not heavily penalized for small data sizes, a critical requirement of this dataset. The low memory requirement is a challenge for VAE, but its strengths in the other necessary areas make it a suitable compromise.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for the dataset as it supports tabular data, healthcare domain, and high dimensionality. It is well-suited for small datasets as it can provide short training times. Despite its requirement for high memory, no other model perfectly matches the dataset's characteristics better while aligning with the low memory requirement, except in its ability to adequately handle the specific strengths required by the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the best choice for this dataset because it handles tabular data well, which is our primary data type. It is also suited for high dimensionality, a characteristic of our dataset, and it works effectively in the medical domain. Although the dataset size is small, the strengths of VAE in handling tabular data and high dimensionality outweigh this weakness. Additionally, despite its higher memory requirements, it has a short training time, which is advantageous when low memory is desired. Other models, such as AnoGAN, MO-GAAL, and AE1SVM, have notable weaknesses with small data size or low memory, making them less ideal for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which are crucial for this dataset. It is also known for its applicability in healthcare, making it relevant for the medical domain. Although it requires high memory, it has shorter training time and includes well with high-dimensional datasets which aligns with the dataset characteristics despite its constraint on data size.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data and is well-suited for healthcare or medical domains. It also handles high dimensionality effectively, which is an important characteristic of the dataset. Though VAE generally requires high memory, the other choices are not better suited due to their significant weaknesses in the context of medical tabular data with high dimensionality and low memory requirements. The VAE's capability of processing small datasets overcomes some of the trade-offs required.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is highly suitable for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are relevant characteristics of the dataset. Furthermore, it performs well in the medical domain and offers short training times, which is beneficial given the low-memory requirement. While it generally requires high memory, the short training time and compatibility with tabular, high-dimensional data make it a good fit despite the small data size. This balance of relevant strengths makes VAE the most suitable choice among the given models.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for small tabular datasets with high dimensionality, matching the dataset's properties. It performs well in medical and healthcare domains and handles high dimensionality effectively. VAE is also efficient in terms of memory usage with a short training time, which aligns with the low memory requirements. While it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, these do not outweigh its advantages for the dataset at hand.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable for this dataset because it handles tabular and high-dimensional data effectively, which matches the dataset's tabular data type and high-dimensionality characteristic. Additionally, it operates well within domains such as healthcare, aligning with the medical domain of the dataset. Despite its requirement for high memory, VAE's short training time and compatibility with GPU make it a viable option given the dataset's small size and low memory requirement constraints. Its ability to handle high-dimensionality and noisy data further solidifies its suitability for this use case.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for this scenario because it handles high dimensionality well, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It also supports tabular data and is strong in the healthcare domain, aligning with the medical domain of the dataset. Additionally, VAE features a short training time and can be applied to small datasets, making it a better fit compared to other models that either have a weakness with small datasets or require more memory than specified.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected as it is well-suited for tabular data and the healthcare domain, handling high dimensionality efficiently. It supports scenarios with noisy data, which is a characteristic of the dataset, though with limited constraints on the presence of noisy data in this particular context. While VAE requires high memory, its strengths in handling small datasets in healthcare and tabular contexts outweigh this minor weakness. It also offers short training times in most circumstances, making it a practical choice for datasets with high dimensionality and low memory requirements, providing a good balance between the dataset characteristics and the model's capabilities.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset's properties. It is well-suited for tabular data and can handle high dimensionality, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, LUNAR offers low memory usage and short training time, which aligns with the requirement for low memory. While it is not specifically tagged for the medical domain, its compatibility with tabular data and short training time makes it a better fit than the other models, which have weaknesses related to small data sizes or high memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. Although it typically requires high memory, it has a short training time and is capable of working with smaller datasets when optimized properly, making it a reasonable fit considering the low memory requirement. Other models have significant weaknesses related to the given dataset characteristics such as being unsuitable for small datasets or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected as it is suitable for tabular data and has strengths in handling high dimensionality and healthcare (medical) datasets. While it usually requires high memory, its ability to deal with noisy data and provide a short training time makes it the best fit given the constraints. Other models in the list either have significant weaknesses with small datasets or are unsuitable for tabular data and low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which aligns with the dataset's properties. While it generally requires high memory, it has a short training time, making it more efficient for a small dataset compared to other models. Despite the weakness with low memory, its ability to work well with healthcare data, accommodating the medical domain, makes it a preferable option among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset as it handles high dimensionality and is applicable for tabular data and medical domains, which match the dataset tags. Although it is not ideal for small data sizes and low memory usage, its strengths in managing high dimensionality, optimal tabular data handling, and capability in the medical field make it the most suitable choice compared to the other models. Other candidate models either lack strengths in tabular or medical datasets, or have significant weaknesses such as inefficiency with small data sizes or low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality, as well as within the medical domain, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It also has a short training time and works well on GPUs. Though it generally requires high memory, it accommodates small datasets, which matches the requirement for a low memory footprint, given the dataset is small. Its strengths in healthcare and high dimensionality make it an appropriate choice for this task.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is chosen because it accommodates tabular data and is suitable for high-dimensional datasets, which matches the dataset properties. Despite requiring high memory, it fits the small size of the dataset due to its ability to handle short training times well, making it more efficient for the given constraints compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the best choice as it effectively handles small tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which matches the given dataset's properties. It also works well in medical domains. While it requires higher memory, it offers short training times and is scalable, which makes it suitable under memory constraints when configured properly. Despite its weakness with discrete or categorical data, the dataset is tagged as tabular and high dimensional, which aligns well with VAE's strengths. In contrast, issues like small dataset size and low memory significantly hinder other model alternatives.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable because it handles tabular data and healthcare domains well, matching the dataset's medical domain tag. It is also strong with high dimensionality, which fits the dataset's characteristics. VAE has a short training time, which compensates for the small data size's potential issues, and while it has weaknesses with imbalanced data and low memory, it doesn't explicitly state a problem with small dataset sizes, unlike models such as AE1SVM or ALAD. This makes VAE the best fit among the options, despite not being optimized for low memory settings.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model given the dataset's properties. It excels in handling high-dimensional tabular and medical data, and it offers short training times which is beneficial for smaller datasets. Despite requiring higher memory, its strengths align well with the dataset characteristics, specifically its ability to manage high dimensionality and tabular data. Additionally, VAEs are equipped to deal with noisy data, and while they might not be the best for discrete or categorical data, the provided dataset does not specify such requirements, making VAE a compatible choice for this task.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data with short training times, aligning with the dataset's need for low memory usage. Despite its minor weakness of needing high memory, it supports high dimensionality, which is a crucial aspect of the dataset. The model's strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data also complement the high-dimensional medical dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, healthcare domain data, and high-dimensional datasets, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite the small data size and low memory requirements which are not its strengths, VAE excels in short training time and can efficiently manage high dimensionality typical of medical datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model is selected because it is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data, includes strengths in the healthcare/medical domain, and effectively handles noisy data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Although VAE requires high memory, its short training time is advantageous given the small data size, and it is scalable, which aligns with dataset constraints and the need for low memory requirements as much as possible.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it handles tabular data and high dimensionality well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Despite its weakness on discrete or categorical data, it requires short training time and is scalable, which aligns with the requirement for low memory usage. Even though VAE typically uses high memory, the focus on the strengths that match the dataset's high dimensionality and compatibility with tabular data in the medical domain make it the best option compared to other models, which have more significant weaknesses related to small data size or the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality and is known for handling healthcare-related datasets well. It performs effectively on small datasets and requires low memory, which aligns well with the dataset requirements. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced data, this aspect is not highlighted in the dataset tags, making VAE the most compatible choice from the list considering both strengths and weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it is tailored for tabular data and can handle small data sizes, which is crucial given the dataset's size characteristic. It also offers short training time and scalability for large datasets, making it adaptable for future data expansions. Although it has high memory usage as a weakness, other models that handle small datasets better do not align well with the tabular data type or low memory requirement in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data, is used in healthcare contexts, and can handle high dimensionality which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. While it may have weaknesses with small data sizes, other models also share this limitation or have other significant weaknesses such as low memory or incompatibility with tabular data. The AutoEncoder is optimized for high-dimensional healthcare data and has short training times, making it a feasible option despite the given constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is specifically strong with tabular data, which fits the dataset's data type. VAE handles high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite having a weakness in low-memory requirements, other models in the list have more critical weaknesses regarding small data size, making them less suitable. VAE also has a short training time and is known for its applicability in the medical domain, matching the dataset's domain needs.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, which is the type of data in this dataset. It is well-suited for high dimensionality, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Even though it is not optimized for small data sizes, it is a good fit considering other model options that have more prominent weaknesses relative to this dataset, especially with low memory requirements. Moreover, AutoEncoder has short training time and scalability, making it advantageous for the given context.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for small, tabular, high-dimensional medical datasets, matching all the given dataset properties. Although VAE has memory constraints, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data while being applicable to healthcare make it the best choice among the provided models. VAE's short training time and ability to work with noisy data further align well with the dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data in the medical domain with high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset properties. It also requires low memory, a critical factor for the dataset. Although VAE has weaknesses with imbalanced data, this is not a specified characteristic of the dataset, making it a more feasible choice compared to others that have more significant weaknesses for small data sizes. VAE also supports short training time, which is beneficial given the dataset's small size.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is selected because it handles tabular data effectively and works well with datasets that have high dimensionality. It also supports datasets with sparse and imbalanced characteristics, which are common in medical data. While it requires high memory, the short training time and capability to handle small datasets make it suitable for this scenario where memory needs to be optimized. Given these considerations, it balances the dataset needs of being high-dimensional and tabular with practical computational constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data, is suitable for healthcare and high dimensionality, both of which align with our dataset properties. It is capable of coming to terms with noisy data and offers a short training time, which is advantageous given the need for low memory use. Although it generally requires high memory, its strengths outweigh its weaknesses compared to other models in the list, particularly for small datasets that it can efficiently manage due to its general adaptability.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is selected because it supports tabular data and works with high-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset characteristics of tabular data and high dimensionality. Although the dataset is small, LUNAR's strength in handling sparse and imbalanced data, along with its short training time, offers flexibility and adaptability. Moreover, despite LUNAR's weakness of being computationally intensive, its ability to work with low-dimensional datasets mitigates the concern of high dimensionality and low memory requirements, making it a suitable choice for the given conditions.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: glass\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"small\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the best choice because it excels with tabular data and is suitable for small datasets, as indicated by its strength in low-dimensional datasets. It features low memory consumption with short training times, which matches the requirement of low memory usage. Additionally, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets, making it versatile for various dataset sizes, unlike other models with weaknesses in handling small data sizes.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is described as 'small', 'tabular data', with a requirement for 'low memory'. LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and is characterized by short training time and good scalability to large datasets. While it is acknowledged for its high memory usage, it has strengths in handling low-dimensional datasets and sparse data, which might offset the memory demand on small data size, making it the optimal choice among the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset as it is designed for tabular data and performs well on small datasets. It is also compatible with low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the small data size and low memory requirement. Additionally, LUNAR offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it a resilient option as data size or complexity potentially increases.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this scenario because it specifically lists tabular data as a strength and is well-suited for low-dimensional datasets. It also has a short training time and is capable of handling sparse and imbalanced data, which might be beneficial even if these are not specified. Although it can be computationally intensive and requires high memory, the low memory requirement of the dataset is a challenge but other models show more serious alignment issues regarding dataset size or data type. Additionally, other models either have explicit weaknesses with small datasets or tabular data, making them less ideal choices.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is suitable for this scenario because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the data type in the dataset. While it generally has higher memory requirements, it offers short training times and does not explicitly list small data size as a weakness, making it a better option than models like AnoGAN, AE1SVM, and ALAD, which suffer from weaknesses related to small data size. Furthermore, VAE manages noisy data effectively, aligning with the characteristics of the dataset. Therefore, VAE balances an acceptable trade-off given the low memory constraint and matches well with tabular data processing needs.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is best suited for this dataset because it demonstrates strengths in handling tabular data, which is a critical dataset characteristic. Additionally, it supports low-dimensional datasets, which is likely applicable given the small data size. LUNAR also has a short training time and is scalable, making it well-suited for low-memory environments. Although LUNAR is computationally intensive and exhibits high memory usage during hyperparameter tuning, its strengths align most closely with the dataset requirements compared to other models in the list, which typically suffer from weaknesses such as inefficiency with small data size or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it has strengths in handling tabular data and small data size is not listed as a weakness. Additionally, it offers short training time, which aligns well with the requirement for low memory usage. Other models either have small data size or low memory listed as a weakness.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags. It is also characterized by short training times and scalability to large datasets, which can accommodate small data size. Despite the dataset's requirement for low memory usage, LUNAR is preferable to other models that have weaknesses in handling small data sizes and low memory situations.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Despite having a small data size, LUNAR's strength lies in handling tabular, low-dimensional datasets efficiently. Moreover, it meets the additional low-memory requirement better than other models, as its weaknesses do not include memory concerns and it boasts a short training time. This makes LUNAR a good fit for the given requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties: it is designed for tabular data, supports low-dimensional datasets, operates well with low memory, and has a short training time. While the dataset size is small, LUNAR's strengths and scalability make it a better fit than the other models available, which generally have weaknesses with low memory or small datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model is the most suitable choice for this scenario due to its capability to handle tabular data and its strength in dealing with small, low-memory datasets. Although not explicitly noted for supporting low memory, it has a short training time which can indirectly assist in managing memory constraints. Other models have explicit weaknesses towards small datasets or low memory, making them less suitable for this specific dataset configuration.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small and is composed of tabular data with a need for low memory usage. LUNAR is strong in handling tabular data, works well with low-dimensional datasets, and operates with short training time, making it suitable for small datasets with low memory requirements. While it requires GPU, it fits better compared to other models which generally have weaknesses in managing small data sizes or require high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data, which is the type of dataset provided. Although it requires high memory, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the additional requirement of low memory. Additionally, VAE's handling of noisy data might be beneficial if the dataset contains noise, making it a balanced choice despite some of its weaknesses on small data sizes.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type provided. It is also optimized for small, low-dimensional datasets and operates efficiently under low memory constraints. Though it has weaknesses like high memory usage, these do not directly affect its ability to handle small datasets and tabular data. Additionally, LUNAR's strengths in short training time and scalability are advantageous compared to other models with small data size weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Although it does not explicitly mention small data sets as a strength, it does not have it listed as a weakness either, which is a better fit compared to other options that list small data size as a weakness. Additionally, VAE has a short training time and supports high dimensionality, which can be beneficial even for small datasets. While it does require high memory, the absence of a low memory constraint as a strength in other models makes VAE a balanced choice given the provided requirements and model analyses.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is suitable for small tabular datasets with low memory requirements. It explicitly lists tabular data as one of its strengths and has a short training time, which is beneficial for small datasets. While it mentions high memory as a weakness, it does not adversely affect datasets of small sizes. Thus, LUNAR's ability to handle tabular data efficiently and its robustness against imbalanced and sparse data makes it a fitting choice.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also efficient with low-dimensional datasets and requires low memory as per the dataset's additional requirements. While the dataset is small, LUNAR offers short training times and is scalable to large datasets, making it adaptable without over-specializing on large memory usage. Additionally, LUNAR does not have 'small data size' as a weakness, unlike many other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. While it does have weaknesses regarding small datasets, its strengths include handling tabular data effectively and offering short training time, which is beneficial given the 'low memory' requirement. Other models either do not support tabular data or have significant weaknesses when applied to small datasets and low memory scenarios.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is strongest in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Although it has some weaknesses with small data size, it is relatively better suited compared to others in terms of handling tabular data with low memory requirements. The other models either do not support tabular data optimally or have significant weaknesses with small datasets and low memory, making VAE the most suitable option from the list provided.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, a key aspect of the dataset. Despite the small data size being a weakness, VAE's strengths in handling tabular data, coupled with short training times and low memory requirements, make it the most appropriate choice from the model list. Other models have more significant weaknesses related to small data size and low memory that make them less suited for the given dataset constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this task as it is specifically designed to handle tabular data and is capable of working with small datasets, which aligns with the 'small' and 'low memory' requirements of the dataset. While it does not have high memory efficiency as a strength, it is the most aligned with the given data characteristics compared to other models that have significant weaknesses with small data size or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small in size, composed of tabular data, and requires low memory usage. LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, has a short training time, and is scalable to large datasets. It excels with low-dimensional datasets and does not have the issue of requiring high memory, which aligns well with the dataset's requirement for low memory usage. While LUNAR has a weakness with images and high memory requirements, these are not dataset requirements or issues, making it a more suitable model compared to others in the list that either poorly handle small datasets or require high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice for a small tabular dataset with the requirement of low memory usage. It is specifically mentioned as strong in handling tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, sparse and imbalanced data, and involves short training time, all of which are essential given the dataset's 'small' size and 'tabular data' characteristics. Additionally, it can be scalable to large datasets, ensuring flexibility for future data growth. While LUNAR has weaknesses concerning high memory usage, its strength in tabular data and lower computational costs makes it the optimal model from the provided list, given the dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset requires a model suitable for small, low-memory tabular data. LUNAR is capable of working well with tabular data while keeping low memory requirements in mind. It offers short training times and scalability, which can be beneficial for further adaptation. Although it is generally computationally intensive, its strengths align with the low-memory and small data size needs better than other models in the list, making it a suitable choice for the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small and consists of tabular data with a low memory requirement. Among the available models, VAE handles tabular data well. While it does have higher memory usage typically associated with its strengths, its short training time and capability with small datasets align with the dataset's characteristics. Although not a perfect fit, it is the best option considering the requirements outlined, as the alternatives have more severe weaknesses in relation to small data sizes or low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it can handle tabular data effectively, which is a specific requirement of the dataset. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and short training times, which are beneficial for extracting meaningful insights from even small datasets. Despite its general requirement for high memory, it's the most suitable considering alternatives' greater weaknesses for the dataset specifics, particularly in dealing with small data size and the need for low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type, and it is designed for low-dimensional datasets, which fits the small data size requirement. It also operates efficiently with sparse data and is scalable to large datasets, offering flexibility beyond the current dataset's small size. Additionally, LUNAR supports low memory usage which is an explicit requirement. While it has some weaknesses like being computationally intensive, these are not critical given the dataset constraints and the context provided.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model as it is well-suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It also efficiently handles small datasets and requires low memory, which matches the additional dataset requirement. Furthermore, it offers scalability and short training time, making it an efficient choice given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is a suitable choice given the dataset properties because it specializes in tabular data, which matches the data type provided. Additionally, despite the small data size, LUNAR is strong with low-dimensional datasets and offers short training time, making it ideal for environments with low memory requirements. Its ability to handle sparse and imbalanced data could also be beneficial. Although LUNAR needs high memory, the other strengths outweigh its weaknesses compared with other models available in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the best choice given the dataset characteristics and requirements. It is suitable for tabular data, accommodates low-dimensional datasets, and ensures a short training time while being scalable to large datasets. Importantly, LUNAR has a strength in handling imbalanced and sparse data which might be relevant given the dataset's small size. It also addresses the low memory requirement better than other models in the list, as it is not explicitly stated to have high memory usage as a weakness, minimizing computational intensive concerns.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this scenario because it supports tabular data, requires low memory, and performs well with small datasets. The dataset is described as small and tabular, so LUNAR's strengths including handling low-dimensional datasets with sparse or imbalanced data make it an optimal fit. While other models may handle tabular data effectively, they often have weaknesses in low memory scenarios or small dataset sizes which align with the dataset's constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Given the small size and tabular nature of the dataset, along with the need for low memory usage, VAE is the most suitable option. It supports tabular data well and has a short training time. Though it has high memory usage as a weakness, it remains more compatible with the dataset than other models which have more pronounced weaknesses for small datasets or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice as it is explicitly designed for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles low-dimensional datasets effectively, which is ideal given the small data size requirement. LUNAR also requires only short training time, a crucial consideration for the low memory requirement. Therefore, it aligns well with the dataset's constraints and tags, even though it has some weaknesses in hyperparameter sensitivity and computational intensity, which are manageable given the scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, aligns well with the requirement for handling small datasets due to its short training time, and can operate within a low memory constraint. Despite its weakness with small datasets, it is relatively better suited compared to other options, as it can manage tabular data efficiently without excessive memory use and has a short training time, which are critical given the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the dataset because it supports tabular data and small dataset sizes, aligns well with low-memory requirements, and offers short training time and scalability, which are beneficial given the dataset constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for small tabular datasets with low memory requirements. It has strengths in handling tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, and provides short training times, which align with the dataset's properties. Unlike the other models, it does not explicitly list 'small data size' as a weakness, and its low memory usage fits the additional requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most appropriate choice for this dataset as it supports tabular data and is well-suited for small datasets due to its short training time. It also performs well on low-dimensional datasets and can run with low memory requirements, matching the dataset's needs for a model that consumes minimal resources. Despite some weaknesses in handling certain data types, its strengths align closely with the dataset's characteristics, making it more suitable than the other models listed.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small and tabular with a requirement for low memory usage. While VAE does not explicitly have strengths in low memory usage, it supports tabular data and has a short training time, which is beneficial for small datasets. VAE's capacity to work with tabular data and its overall compatibility with the given dataset characteristics make it the most suitable choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Although it is designed for larger datasets, it offers short training time, which is beneficial for small datasets. It does not have low memory requirements, which is a disadvantage, but compared to other options, it aligns closely with dataset needs without significant weaknesses. VAE's strengths include handling noisy data, easy integration with GPU, and short training time, making it the best fit among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is chosen because it is compatible with tabular data and addresses the requirement for low memory usage due to its short training time. Despite its need for high memory, VAE does not explicitly have 'low memory' as a weakness, unlike other models. Most critically, VAE is well-suited for small datasets, making it the best choice considering the dataset properties and limited compatibility of other models with small data sizes.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is a strong fit for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also suitable for small datasets as it works well with low-dimensional datasets, and has low memory requirements which aligns with the additional requirement of low memory consumption. LUNAR supports scalable learning with short training times, making it efficient for small datasets while ensuring effective performance.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small and of tabular type, with low memory requirements. VAE is particularly suitable for tabular data and has a short training time, compensating for the dataset's small size. Despite its high memory usage, it aligns more closely with the dataset characteristics compared to other models, which have significant weaknesses in tabular data or require larger datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small, tabular, and requires a low memory footprint. Despite LUNAR's high memory usage weakness, it is suitable for tabular data, has short training time, and supports small, low-dimensional datasets, matching the dataset properties. Its strength in handling sparse and imbalanced data, along with short training times, makes it the best fit among the options.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset because it excels with tabular data and is designed for low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics and size. It also has efficient memory usage and short training time, making it apt for low-memory constraints, which is a requirement here. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which can be beneficial as the dataset grows.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the best choice for the given dataset properties because it supports tabular data and has strengths in handling low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset characteristics of being small in size and tabular in nature. It also offers low memory usage and short training time, which meet the additional requirement of low memory. While it has weaknesses related to images and audio, these are not relevant to the dataset type at hand.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model because it excels with tabular data, which matches the dataset data type. It also handles low-dimensional and sparse data well, aligning with the dataset's need for low memory usage. Additionally, LUNAR offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which are advantageous attributes that align with small data size constraints, even though high memory might be a concern. Other models like VAE and AutoEncoder have weaknesses with small data and low memory, making them less suitable in this context.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for a small tabular dataset with low memory requirements. It specifically strengths in handling tabular data and small datasets, with efficient memory usage and short training time which meets the dataset's additional requirements. Unlike other models, it does not have significant weaknesses for small dataset sizes or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected as it aligns well with the dataset properties of being small, tabular, and requiring low memory. It is specifically strong for tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, making it well-suited for handling the provided dataset. Moreover, LUNAR has a short training time and does not rely on high memory, which suits the additional requirement of low memory usage. While it has some weaknesses such as being computationally intensive, its strengths play well into the dataset characteristics provided.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice as it specifically lists tabular data as a strength, matches the requirement of being efficient for low-dimensional datasets, and is scalable to large datasets. Additionally, it suits low memory requirements with short training time, making it ideal for small data sizes. While it is computationally intensive, its strengths align well with the dataset characterized as small, tabular, and requiring low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this case because it is designed to handle tabular data efficiently, which aligns with the dataset type specified. Additionally, it requires low memory and has a short training time, making it ideal for a small dataset with low memory requirements. While it is computationally intensive, its compatibility with GPU can compensate for this, and it is scalable to large datasets, which provides flexibility for future data expansion.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: satimage-2\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"large\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"agriculture\", \"technology\", \"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"high dimensionality\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"high memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality and high memory requirements, as indicated by the dataset tags. Its strengths include handling high dimensionality, tabular data, and scalability to large datasets, which align perfectly with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, AE1SVM benefits from using GPU and a short training time, making it efficient for large-scale applications in technology domains.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for large datasets with high dimensionality and tabular data, aligning with the dataset properties. It also requires high memory and has strengths in utilizing the GPU, both of which are additional requirements for this dataset. Unlike other models, AE1SVM also gracefully handles sparse and imbalanced data, which is not explicitly required but could be beneficial. Its ability to scale to large datasets with short training time makes it an optimal choice for the problem at hand.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and large datasets, which matches the dataset tags. It is also capable of using high memory and has a short training time, which aligns with the 'high memory' requirement. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, making it a good fit given the dataset size is large. Although it may struggle with imbalanced data, this is less prioritized given its other strengths that match the dataset characteristics. Other models either lack scalability, or are not optimized for tabular data, limiting their compatibility with the dataset's nature.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected as the most suitable model because it excels at handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also scalable to large datasets and supports high memory usage, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirements. The short training time is an additional advantage for efficiently processing the large dataset, whereas its capabilities in technology and noisy data domains further support its suitability for the provided dataset context.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is highly suitable for the given dataset properties as it has strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, both of which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and can process high memory requirements, which aligns well with the dataset's large size and memory constraints. Furthermore, its capability to manage noisy data is beneficial given the potential presence of noise in high-dimensional agricultural and technology-related data.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is a good choice because it is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also handles noisy data effectively and supports GPU acceleration, which are important given the high-memory requirement. Furthermore, ALAD is scalable to large datasets, making it a strong candidate for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it has strong alignment with the dataset characteristics: it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset's high dimensionality and tabular data properties. Moreover, it is suitable considering the high memory requirement and is scalable to large datasets. It also leverages a GPU and offers short training times, making it efficient for processing large datasets with high dimensional complexity, which fit well within the provided dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it handles high-dimensional tabular data efficiently, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets, supports high memory requirements, and offers a short training time, matching the dataset's large size and additional memory constraints. While it may not be ideal for imbalanced data, this is not a specified requirement in the dataset properties, making it an excellent overall choice given the strengths needed.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the dataset given its strengths. It is effective with tabular data and high dimensionality, aligning with the dataset's properties. Additionally, AE1SVM handles large datasets with scalability and has high memory capacity, meeting the dataset's requirements for high memory. The model also offers compatibility with GPU and short training time, ensuring efficient processing. Its applicability in the technology domain further complements the dataset's domain specifications. Despite its weakness with noisy data, AE1SVM's strengths in other relevant areas make it the best choice from the provided model list.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it caters to large tabular datasets with high dimensionality and high memory requirements. It is also scalable to large datasets and benefits from a short training time. Additionally, the strengths of AutoEncoder align with the technology domain, which is part of the dataset characteristics. Despite its weaknesses with imbalanced data, which wasn't highlighted as a concern, the AutoEncoder's strengths make it well-suited for this task over the other models considered.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It handles high dimensional tabular data effectively and is capable of scaling to large datasets, which is essential given the dataset's large size and high dimensionality. Additionally, it supports high memory requirements, making it a good match. Unlike some other models, AE1SVM's strengths do not conflict with any of the dataset tags, and its ability to operate on tabular data specifically aligns well with the characteristics of the dataset provided.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable for the given dataset properties as it supports tabular data, has strengths in handling high dimensionality, and is scalable to large datasets. It capitalizes on the use of GPU and requires high memory, aligning with the additional requirements stated. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced datasets, this does not directly conflict with the provided dataset tags, making it a viable choice considering the overall strengths relevant to the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It also operates well under high memory conditions and is scalable to large datasets, which fits the requirements of the dataset. Additionally, ALAD aligns with the domain tags such as technology and agriculture. Although it has long training times as a weakness, its strengths align more closely with the dataset properties compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is ideal for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and scalability to large tabular datasets, which match the dataset characteristics. It also efficiently utilizes high memory environments and provides short training times, aligning well with the additional dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is best suited for the dataset as it strongly supports high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the provided dataset tags. It is also scalable to large datasets and leverages GPU and high memory, aligning with the additional requirements. Despite its weakness with noisy data, it still offers short training times and handles sparse and imbalanced data well, making it a robust choice for this context.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for tabular data and is strong in handling high dimensionality and large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset properties. Additionally, it supports high memory requirements and is scalable to large datasets. Its strengths in technology and imbalanced data further match the domain and characteristics of the dataset. Despite its weakness in handling noisy data, the other strengths outweigh this consideration for the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is best suited for this dataset because it handles high dimensional tabular data effectively. It supports high memory use, making it suitable for large datasets, and has a short training time. It is capable of dealing with noisy data and can be scaled to large datasets. Despite its weaknesses with small data size and imbalanced data, these do not conflict with the dataset properties provided.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is chosen for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is also scalable to large datasets and supports high memory usage, addressing the dataset's large size and memory requirements. Additionally, the AutoEncoder can manage noisy data and benefits from short training times, making it suitable for the domain of agriculture and technology, while avoiding the weaknesses associated with small data size or imbalanced datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is suitable for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It supports GPU for faster processing, handles high memory requirements, and is scalable to large datasets. Furthermore, it efficiently manages noisy data, which is crucial given the dataset properties. The strengths of AutoEncoder align well with the dataset's characteristics, and it does not have critical weaknesses that would negatively impact its performance for this application.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which align with the dataset characteristics. It also supports high memory usage and is scalable to large datasets, addressing the additional requirement of high memory. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data and small data sizes, these are not primary concerns given the dataset's characteristics of being large and high-dimensional. The alignment with such key dataset properties makes AE1SVM a better choice compared to other models on the list for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is the best choice given the dataset properties: large size, tabular data, high dimensionality, and high memory requirements. It is strong in handling tabular data and high dimensionality and can be implemented on a GPU for scalability to large datasets. The strengths align well with the dataset tags and outweigh the weaknesses, such as long training time and non-scalability, given the dataset's nature and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality with a need for high memory. AutoEncoder is suited for tabular data with high dimensionality and is scalable to large datasets. It also handles noisy data and utilizes high memory efficiently. Additionally, it has a short training time which is beneficial for dealing with large data sizes.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is strong in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, both characteristics of our dataset. It is also capable of working with large datasets and utilizes high memory, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, it has short training times and is scalable to large datasets, making it efficient for the large dataset size. The weaknesses of AutoEncoder, such as its performance on small data sizes or real-time data, are irrelevant, as our focus is on a large tabular dataset. Other models like DevNet and AnoGAN have weaknesses related to tabular data or high memory needs, making them less suitable.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the dataset given its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. It also supports large data sizes and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset requirements. Moreover, it is scalable to large datasets and benefits from using GPU, which is advantageous in this use case. Although it might struggle with noisy data, the other strengths outweigh this weakness for the given dataset context.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the best choice for this dataset because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also supports high memory requirements and is scalable to large datasets, fitting well with the dataset's tags. Additionally, it offers short training times and is optimized for noisy data, making it suitable for applications in agriculture and technology.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It has strengths in handling high dimensional data, adapting to tabular data, and leveraging high memory resources efficiently, along with a capacity for managing large datasets. The model's strengths in technology-related domains further support its suitability. Despite the weakness in handling discrete or categorical data, which is not a primary concern here, VAE aligns well with the dataset's tags and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the best choice for this dataset as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data efficiently, which are crucial for the given dataset's characteristics. It is designed to work well with large datasets and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. The AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which makes it suitable for large-scale applications in domains like agriculture and technology that are mentioned in the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it handles tabular data with high dimensionality effectively. It scales well to large datasets and supports high memory requirements. Moreover, it has a short training time and is compatible with noisy data, aligning well with the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The ALAD model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and model analyses. The dataset is characterized by large size, tabular data, high dimensionality, and a need for high memory capacity. ALAD's strengths align well with these properties, including handling tabular and high-dimensional data, support for large datasets, and high memory capability. Despite long training times, its scalability, suitability for large datasets, and capability in handling high dimensionality make it the most appropriate option among the provided models.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which matches the characteristics of the provided dataset. It supports tabular data, high dimensionality, requires high memory, and is scalable to large datasets, making it an excellent choice for the dataset tags provided. Additionally, AE1SVM has strengths in technology and can handle the data characteristics well without any major weaknesses impacting its performance for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It handles tabular data well, which matches the dataset type. The large data size can be managed efficiently since AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets. It performs well with high dimensionality and requires high memory, which fits the characteristics of the dataset. The model also offers short training time, which is advantageous in working with large datasets and ensures efficient model deployment in technological applications.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset description indicating high memory requirements and large data size. Its strengths include the ability to handle high dimensionality, tabular data, and scalability to large datasets, all key aspects of this dataset. While it may not perform as well with noisy data, it aligns with most of the dataset characteristics, making it the best overall fit from the model list provided.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality and high memory requirements. Unlike other models, it specifically excels in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and is scalable to large datasets with strengths in technology domains. It also leverages GPU which is beneficial for large datasets and complex computations, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics. While it does struggle with real-time and noisy data, these are not the prominent concerns for the given dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset properties with its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is capable of handling large datasets with high memory requirements. AE1SVM's scalability makes it appropriate for the large data size specified. Despite its weakness in dealing with noise, the dataset doesn't emphasize this requirement, making AE1SVM the best fit among the available model choices.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AE1SVM model is the most suitable for the provided dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which match the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, AE1SVM is capable of utilizing high memory resources and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset requirements. Its weaknesses are not directly impactful given the dataset properties, making it a fitting choice compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and large datasets, which align with the dataset properties. It also supports high memory usage, making it ideal given the additional memory requirements. AE1SVM's capability to handle sparse and imbalanced data further contributes to its suitability, despite the current dataset not explicitly mentioning these characteristics. Its short training time and scalability to large datasets add to its advantages, aligning well with the dataset's large size.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset consists of large tabular data with high dimensionality and high memory requirements. The AutoEncoder is well-suited for this dataset as it is designed to handle tabular data and high dimensionality. It also supports large datasets with scalable architecture and benefits from the usage of GPUs. Its short training time further adds to its effectiveness given the dataset's large size.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. It also handles high memory requirements and is scalable to large datasets, making it a robust choice for the dataset described. Additionally, it supports GPU acceleration and has a relatively short training time, further enhancing its suitability for this use case. Despite potential limitations with noisy data, its overall strengths align well with the dataset's needs in agriculture and technology domains.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is best suited for this dataset due to its strengths. It is capable of handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. Moreover, it is scalable to large datasets and supports high memory requirements. Additionally, it has a short training time, making it efficient for handling large datasets. Its capability to leverage GPU enhances its scalability further. While it does not deal well with noisy data, this is not a constraint of the dataset based on the given tags.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, aligning with the dataset's properties. It handles high dimensionality effectively and supports GPU usage for better performance on large datasets. Furthermore, its capacity for high memory usage and short training time makes it apt for the described requirements. Despite the dataset's large size, the AutoEncoder's scalability to large datasets and its ability to handle noisy data and high-dimensional features make it the most suitable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. Moreover, it is designed to handle high memory requirements, leverage GPU, and offer a scalable solution for large datasets, while also performing well with technology domain data. Its strengths align closely with the dataset requirements, particularly its ability to manage noisy data and deliver short training times, which are beneficial for efficient processing of extensive agricultural and technological data collections.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AE1SVM model is the most suitable choice as it aligns well with the dataset properties and requirements. It excels with high dimensionality, tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets, matching the dataset's characteristics. It supports high memory usage, which is a requirement for this dataset, and offers short training times which is beneficial given the large data size. Although AE1SVM does not handle noisy data well, this drawback is less impactful given its overall alignment with other critical dataset properties and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is particularly well-suited for the given dataset as it supports high dimensional tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets, aligns with the requirement of high memory usage, and offers short training time which is crucial for processing large datasets efficiently. Additionally, AE1SVM handles high dimensionality effectively and is suitable for domains like technology, which is one of the domains mentioned in the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is best suited for this dataset because it effectively handles tabular data, high dimensionality, and large datasets, which are all relevant features of the provided dataset. Additionally, it supports high memory usage and has a short training time, making it well-suited for handling large-scale problems in the technology and agriculture domains. Its compatibility with GPU further enhances its scalability and efficiency for high-dimensional and large-size datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, high-dimensional, and requires high memory utilization. AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data, scales well to large datasets, and handles high dimensionality efficiently. It also supports high memory requirements and provides short training time, making it a fitting choice given the dataset's characteristics and additional needs.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and the requirement for high memory, which aligns with the dataset's tags. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, has a short training time, and supports the use of GPUs. These strengths make it the most appropriate choice for the large, high-dimensional, tabular dataset, while other models have weaknesses such as long training times or being less suited for high memory usage that are not aligned with the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is capable of handling tabular data and high dimensionality, both characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is well-suited for large datasets and high memory requirements, aligning well with the dataset's description. The model's strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and capability of leveraging GPUs further support its selection. While it is not the best choice for imbalanced data, this dataset characteristic is not mentioned, making the AutoEncoder a rational choice considering the given context.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable for this dataset as it supports high dimensional and tabular data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also utilizes GPU and can handle large datasets with high memory requirements, aligning with the dataset's properties. Additionally, AutoEncoder has a short training time, making it efficient for large datasets, and it does not have a limitation on high memory, unlike some other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it excels in handling high dimensionality, supports tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets. Additionally, it is optimized for high memory usage, which aligns with the dataset's requirements. Although it is weak in dealing with noisy data, no model perfectly fits all dataset characteristics, and AE1SVM's overall compatibility with the provided dataset properties makes it the most appropriate choice from the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, as well as large datasets which require high memory, aligning perfectly with the dataset tags. It also handles noisy data effectively and has short training time, making it a robust choice despite its weaknesses with small data size and real-time data, which are not applicable concerns in this scenario.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: vertebral\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"small\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"medical\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"noisy data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties because it is capable of handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also performs well with noisy data, aligning with the dataset's noise characteristic. Despite the data's small size, VAE's strengths in the healthcare domain and short training time make it an ideal choice. Although it does not specifically cater to low memory requirements, it does sufficiently align with other critical dataset needs, especially in handling tabular and noisy data effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for this task as it handles tabular data well and is specifically strong in healthcare applications, where medical data is typically used. It is proficient in dealing with noisy data, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Although it is generally better for larger datasets, VAE's short training time makes it a good option given the need for low memory usage. Other models either do not perform well with small datasets, noisy data, or tabular data, making VAE the most balanced choice given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data, which is a primary characteristic of the dataset provided. It handles noisy data effectively, a key dataset characteristic, and performs adequately on small datasets. Although its weakness is in using high memory, the 'low memory' requirement doesn't disqualify it as significantly as it does other models. The VAE's compatibility with tabular, medical data and capability to manage noisy datasets makes it the most appropriate choice given the constraints and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset because it effectively handles tabular data and healthcare domains, both of which are relevant to this dataset. Additionally, VAE is known for its strength in dealing with noisy data, a key characteristic of the provided dataset, and it is optimized for short training times, which is beneficial for small datasets requiring low memory usage. While VAE does have weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, the other characteristics align well with the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is suitable for tabular data, healthcare (medical domain), and handles noisy data well. Despite the dataset being small, VAE does not have explicit weaknesses in handling small data size compared to other models in the list. Additionally, it doesn't require low memory, but it compensates by offering short training time and the ability to handle noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it is suitable for tabular data and healthcare domains, can handle noisy data, and requires short training time. Despite its weakness with small data sizes, it generally aligns well with the data characteristics given the available options. Other models either have significant weaknesses with tabular data or noisy data, or require high memory capacity that the dataset cannot accommodate.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable for small tabular datasets within the medical domain, handling noisy data effectively. Despite high memory requirements, it offers short training times and is appropriate for healthcare applications, making it the best match for the given dataset’s characteristics, especially when no other model from the list supports both small data sizes and noisy environments without substantial weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is best suited for the provided dataset because it supports tabular data and is applicable to the medical domain. VAE handles noisy data effectively, which is a key characteristic of the dataset, and it trains relatively quickly. Although it is typically designed for larger datasets, it can still function on small datasets if the noise handling capability is critical. The model's downsides, such as issues with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, do not significantly conflict with the dataset properties. Additionally, while VAE tends to require higher memory, it is more flexible compared to other models which explicitly highlight low memory and small data size as weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data in the medical domain with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite being suboptimal for small data sizes, it possesses strengths in handling tabular, healthcare-focused datasets with noise, making it the best candidate compared to others in the list. It also benefits from short training times and is scalable to large datasets, which could be advantageous if the dataset grows. Additionally, its reliance on GPU rather than CPU aligns well with the dataset needs related to memory and computational considerations.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is suitable for tabular data, healthcare (medical domain), and can handle noisy data, matching the dataset's properties of being small, tabular, noisy, and in the medical domain. Although it requires high memory, it is well suited for small data sizes unlike other available models that strongly disfavor small datasets. It also has a short training time, fulfilling the low memory requirement as best as possible from the given options.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. The dataset is small, consists of tabular data related to the medical domain, and may contain noise. VAE strengths include handling tabular data, healthcare applications, and dealing with noisy data. Additionally, it has a short training time, which meets the low memory requirement. While it isn't optimal for small datasets, no model perfectly meets all of the dataset tags, and the advantages of VAE align more closely with the dataset requirements than the other options.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is most suitable for small, noisy, tabular medical datasets with low memory requirements. Its strengths include handling tabular data, healthcare applications, and noisy data effectively. Although it requires high memory, it has the advantage of short training time and scalability to large datasets, which compensates for the dataset's low memory constraint. Other models with strengths in handling noisy data or medical datasets have weaknesses regarding small data sizes or tabular data that the VAE doesn't have.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and healthcare domains, which aligns with the dataset properties. It handles noisy data effectively and has a short training time, which is beneficial given the requirement for low memory usage. Despite being better suited for larger datasets, its strengths closely match the dataset characteristics more than other models on the list.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable choice for a small dataset of tabular data in the medical domain characterized by noisy data, with additional requirements of low memory usage. The VAE model's strengths include handling tabular data and noisy data effectively, both of which are key characteristics of the provided dataset. Though it generally operates with high memory, for small datasets like the one described, it should still manage memory constraints better than other options, making it the best fit compared to other models listed.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It is effective for handling noisy data, a characteristic of the dataset. Even though VAE requires high memory, which is a potential issue given the low memory requirement, its strengths in handling small datasets with short training time, particularly in the medical domain, outweigh this drawback. Other models have more critical weaknesses for this context, such as poor performance with tabular data or longer training times that do not align with the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is recommended as it supports tabular data, can handle noisy data, and is suitable for healthcare domain applications. While it requires high memory, its capability to manage noisy and high-dimensional data makes it a better fit for the given dataset characteristics compared to the other models listed. Despite the data size being small, VAE's aptness for healthcare and robustness against noise make it the most balanced choice.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for small, noisy, tabular medical data, as it specifically lists tabular data, healthcare, and noisy data as its strengths. Despite its need for high memory, it is the only model in the list that adequately balances the requirement for handling both tabular data and noise effectively. While some weaknesses include potential high memory usage, the dataset's other needs align well with VAE's capabilities compared to other models, making it the best overall choice given the low-memory constraint is not as heavily emphasized in the dataset tags as other characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is chosen because it is effective with tabular data, particularly in the healthcare domain, and can handle noisy data which is a characteristic of the dataset. Despite its vulnerability to high memory usage and requiring careful hyperparameter tuning, it has a short training time suitable for small datasets and provides GPU acceleration. This aligns well with the dataset's small size, noisiness, low memory requirement, and the medical domain specification.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for small tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset properties. Its ability to handle healthcare data, short training time, and good performance on noisy tabular data make it a strong candidate. Although it requires high memory, its strengths align well with the primary requirements of the dataset such as handling noisy data and tabular format, and it will perform adequately despite the dataset size being small.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is the best choice for this dataset because it supports tabular data and excels in handling noisy data, which aligns with the characteristics of the dataset. Furthermore, it is relevant in the medical domain and has a short training time, making it suitable for a small dataset that requires low memory usage. Despite its minor weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, VAE's high dimensionality capabilities and efficient performance on noisy data make it the most suitable model from the provided list.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model given the dataset's characteristics. The dataset is small, comprises tabular data from a medical domain, and contains noisy data. VAE has strengths in handling both tabular and noisy data and is commonly applied in healthcare domains. While it uses high memory, which is a minor concern, it compensates with its short training time, making it a viable option under low memory conditions. None of the weaknesses of the VAE, like issues with discrete data or requiring well-tuned hyperparameters, are highly problematic for this dataset, making it the best fit among the given models.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable because it handles tabular data and noisy data well, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is also noted for performing effectively in the healthcare domain, which is relevant to this dataset's medical domain. Although VAE requires high memory, it has a short training time, making it more feasible for small datasets compared to the other models. Overall, VAE appears to be the best fit given the dataset properties and model analyses.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for small tabular medical datasets with noisy data. Its strengths include handling of tabular data, healthcare domain applicability, and robustness to noisy data, aligning well with the dataset's properties. While VAE typically requires high memory, its compatibility with noisy data and short training time make it a better fit compared to other models, given the constraints of the dataset, especially in terms of memory efficiency and data compatibility.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for the provided dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and healthcare domains, which align with the dataset's characteristics. It is also capable of dealing with noisy data, which is a key property of the dataset. Although VAE typically requires high memory, it has a short training time which mitigates this constraint to some extent in a small dataset context. Among the listed models, VAE aligns most closely with the dataset needs, particularly focusing on tabular, medical data, and noise resiliency.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the best choice given the dataset's properties and the model's characteristics. It is well-suited for handling tabular data and performs efficiently with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Although not optimal for small data sizes, it handles healthcare and medical domains effectively, which is a critical factor given the dataset's domain. Furthermore, VAE has a comparatively short training time and is optimized for noisy data, making it suitable for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it performs well on tabular data, handles noisy data effectively, and has strengths in the healthcare domain. Although it usually requires high memory, it has a short training time, making it relatively efficient. While VAE works well on large datasets, it doesn't explicitly have weaknesses related to small datasets in the context provided, unlike others in the list. Thus, it aligns well with your requirement for low memory alongside handling tabular medical data.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and healthcare domains, as well as its ability to manage noisy data effectively. It has strengths in high dimensionality and short training time, which align with the dataset's characteristics. Although VAE requires high memory, its strengths outweigh its weaknesses compared to other models in the list, especially since it supports short training times on small, noisy datasets in a medical domain.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model as it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics and requirements. It is effective with tabular data and can handle noisy data, which is critical for the medical domain with potentially noisy inputs. While not optimized for small data sizes, it offers advantages like short training time, which aligns with low memory constraints. The VAE's strengths in handling healthcare-specific data further support its selection in this context.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data, healthcare-related datasets, and noisy data, which matches the characteristics of the given dataset. It also supports short training times and works well with high-dimensional datasets. Although it requires high memory, the short training time and its ability to handle noisy and tabular data make it a good choice for small datasets, especially in the medical domain, despite the dataset's low memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is best suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, healthcare, and noisy data. It is capable of working with small datasets and offers short training time. Although it requires high memory, it aligns well with the domain (medical) and data characteristics (noisy data) while also effectively handling tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice as it supports tabular data and can handle noisy data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It is also commonly used in the healthcare domain, and while it has high memory requirements, the dataset being 'small' helps mitigate this disadvantage. Additionally, the VAE's ability to work with small datasets and short training time makes it a viable option given the requirement for low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is best suited given the dataset properties and model characteristics. It performs well on tabular data and specifically caters to applications in healthcare, aligning well with the medical domain tag. It is capable of handling noisy data, a notable characteristic of the dataset. VAE also offers a short training time, which is advantageous for efficient model deployment. Despite its high memory requirement, it is the most appropriate choice from the list, considering the absence of better-matching models for small datasets with low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data, healthcare, and can handle noisy data, which fits the dataset's characteristics. Even though VAE typically benefits from larger datasets, its compatibility with tabular data, short training time, and ability to manage noise make it a reasonable choice for a small, noisy medical dataset. Additionally, it can work in a low memory environment and requires less computational power compared to some other models.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is selected due to its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset properties. Despite the small data size being a minor drawback, VAE's capabilities in healthcare and its suitability for low memory environments make it the best fit among the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data and handles noisy data well, which are critical for this medical dataset. It also includes strengths like short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory requirement. Despite needing higher memory generally, VAE’s ability to work on small datasets in healthcare and its capability with tabular data makes it the most appropriate choice considering the dataset's properties.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a suitable choice because it handles tabular data well, which is crucial given the dataset type. It also addresses noisy data, a characteristic of the dataset, and is recognized for short training times that align well with the low memory requirement. Although it has a weakness with discrete or categorical data, this is not highlighted as a dataset property, allowing VAE's strengths to be leveraged effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is chosen because it is strong in handling tabular data and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its high memory requirements, VAE offers high utility in medical domains and is known for its short training time, making it a suitable choice for a small dataset size while managing noisy data effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for small tabular datasets with noisy data and limited memory requirements. It also caters well to medical applications, which aligns with the dataset domain. The model's strengths in handling tabular data, healthcare applications, and noisy data, combined with short training time, make it the most appropriate choice given the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the best choice due to its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, both of which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, VAE is suitable for small data sizes, has a short training time, and can operate with low memory requirements despite its high-memory strength, making it apt for the given low-memory constraint. Although it has weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data, the overall fit with the dataset characteristics outweighs this issue.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is suitable for the given dataset properties as it is strong with tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It effectively handles noisy data, a key characteristic of the dataset. Even though it has high memory requirements, which is a potential issue, its strengths align well with the requirements of handling small medical datasets in a tabular format.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, which are aspects of the given dataset. Additionally, it is well-suited for small data sizes, unlike many other models in the list that have weaknesses in handling small datasets. Although VAE typically requires high memory, its strengths in short training times and capability to handle high dimensionality make it the best fit among the options provided, especially when 'low memory' is a constraint, as none of the models perfectly meet this requirement while also being favorable for small and noisy tabular datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small, tabular, and noisy, requiring a model that can handle these characteristics while also having low memory requirements. VAE is strong with tabular data, noisy data, and noisy healthcare-related datasets, and has a short training time, which fits the small dataset criterion well. While it has a high memory requirement, it is the most suitable choice given the other models have more significant weaknesses for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is well-suited for small, tabular datasets often found in medical domains and performs effectively with noisy data. It has strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, which aligns well with the characteristics of the provided dataset. While VAE does have high memory usage, it compensates with short training times, making it relatively efficient even with memory constraints. Other models either lack support for small datasets or tabular data, or have pronounced weaknesses in handling noisy data effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It supports tabular data and is effective with noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset's primary characteristics. While VAE typically requires high memory resources, its short training time and compatibility with medical domain make it a viable option for a small dataset with low memory requirements. Among the listed models, VAE provides a balance between handling noise and being efficient on small datasets in the medical domain.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It can handle noisy data, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Despite high memory requirements being a weakness, VAE's strengths in short training time and its ability to work with small data sizes, make it a better fit than other models. Most importantly, VAE specifically mentions strengths in healthcare, aligning with the domain of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected as it supports tabular data, is well-suited for healthcare and noisy data contexts, and offers short training times. While it does favor high memory, it balances this by aligning with the requirement to handle noisy data and tabular formats effectively, making it a better choice over other models that have specific limitations related to small data sizes or low memory capabilities.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it effectively handles tabular data and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Although it requires high memory, it is suitable for small data sizes in healthcare domains, aligning well with the dataset's medical tag. It also supports efficient training times, making it compatible with the additional requirement of low memory usage in this context.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and healthcare domains, and it handles noisy data effectively, which matches the dataset properties. Additionally, it has a short training time and is manageable with small datasets despite its weaknesses, which contrasts with other models that have more limiting factors given the dataset's requirements. Although VAE requires high memory, its ability to handle the given dataset's primary characteristics makes it the most appropriate choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable for the small, noisy, tabular medical dataset with low memory requirements. It has strengths in handling tabular data with noisy data in healthcare domains, which matches the dataset characteristics. Although it requires high memory and might not be optimal for low memory environments, it otherwise matches the dataset tags better than other models, which have more severe weaknesses or are less aligned with the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is well-suited for the given dataset because it handles tabular data and healthcare/medical data effectively, which matches the domain and data type of the dataset. It specifically handles noisy data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Furthermore, despite the small data size being a general weakness for many models, VAE offers a short training time, which can mitigate issues with small datasets. Although it generally requires high memory, it balances this with the ability to process noisy, high-dimensional tabular data efficiently, making it the best match from the given model list.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n" + ] + } + ], + "source": [ + "select_model_datasets(repeat=50)" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 20, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "import pandas as pd\n", + "import json\n", + "import os\n", + "\n", + "prn_df = pd.read_csv('prn_df.csv')\n", + "roc_df = pd.read_csv('roc_df.csv')\n", + "time_df = pd.read_csv('time_df.csv')" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 21, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "name": "stdout", + "output_type": "stream", + "text": [ + "Loaded results for condition 'output'\n" + ] + } + ], + "source": [ + "def load_experiment_results(results_dir='with_note_selection_results'):\n", + " experiment_results = {}\n", + " result_files = [f for f in os.listdir(results_dir) if f.endswith('.json')]\n", + " \n", + " for result_file in result_files:\n", + " condition = os.path.splitext(result_file)[0]\n", + " file_path = os.path.join(results_dir, result_file)\n", + " with open(file_path, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:\n", + " data = json.load(f)\n", + " experiment_results[condition] = data\n", + " print(f\"Loaded results for condition '{condition}'\")\n", + " \n", + " return experiment_results\n", + "\n", + "experiment_results = load_experiment_results()" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": null, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "import re\n", + "from collections import Counter\n", + "import numpy as np\n", + "import pandas as pd\n", + "import matplotlib.pyplot as plt\n", + "\n", + "model_list = ['MO-GAAL', 'AutoEncoder', 'SO-GAAL', 'VAE', 'AnoGAN', 'Deep SVDD', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'DevNet', 'LUNAR']\n", + "\n", + "for condition, results in experiment_results.items():\n", + " print(f\"\\nCondition: {condition}\")\n", + " model_counter = Counter()\n", + " for dataset_name, responses in results.items():\n", + " for response in responses:\n", + " answer = response['selected_model']\n", + " cleaned_answer = re.sub(r'[^a-zA-Z\\s]', '', answer)\n", + " cleaned_answer_upper = cleaned_answer.upper()\n", + " for model in model_list:\n", + " model_cleaned = re.sub(r'[^a-zA-Z]', '', model).upper()\n", + " if model_cleaned in cleaned_answer_upper.replace(' ', ''):\n", + " model_counter[model] += 1\n" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 23, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "name": "stdout", + "output_type": "stream", + "text": [ + "pima\n", + "tops: ['AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'DeepSVDD', 'AnoGAN', 'VAE']\n", + "selected: ['AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'ALAD', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'SO-GAAL', 'VAE', 'ALAD', 'ALAD', 'ALAD', 'LUNAR', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'SO-GAAL', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'ALAD', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM']\n", + "cardio\n", + "tops: ['VAE', 'DeepSVDD', 'AE1SVM', 'AnoGAN', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "selected: ['AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'Deep SVDD', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'Deep SVDD', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "mnist\n", + "tops: ['VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'DeepSVDD']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE']\n", + "arrhythmia\n", + "tops: ['LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AnoGAN']\n", + "selected: ['AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM']\n", + "pendigits\n", + "tops: ['VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AnoGAN', 'DeepSVDD', 'MO-GAAL']\n", + "selected: ['AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'Deep SVDD', 'AE1SVM', 'Deep SVDD', 'Deep SVDD', 'VAE', 'SO-GAAL', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'Deep SVDD', 'LUNAR', 'Deep SVDD', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AnoGAN', 'Deep SVDD', 'Deep SVDD', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'Deep SVDD', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'SO-GAAL', 'Deep SVDD', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'DevNet', 'Deep SVDD', 'Deep SVDD', 'Deep SVDD', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'Deep SVDD', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'Deep SVDD', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'Deep SVDD', 'VAE']\n", + "shuttle\n", + "tops: ['VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'DeepSVDD', 'AE1SVM', 'AnoGAN']\n", + "selected: ['AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "letter\n", + "tops: ['LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'DevNet', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'SO-GAAL', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE']\n", + "musk\n", + "tops: ['VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'DevNet', 'DeepSVDD', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "selected: ['ALAD', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "vowels\n", + "tops: ['LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'DevNet', 'VAE']\n", + "selected: ['AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'Deep SVDD', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'Deep SVDD', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AnoGAN', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'Deep SVDD', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "optdigits\n", + "tops: ['AnoGAN', 'DevNet', 'MO-GAAL', 'DeepSVDD', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE']\n", + "satellite\n", + "tops: ['AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'AnoGAN', 'MO-GAAL', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "selected: ['AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM']\n", + "lympho\n", + "tops: ['AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AnoGAN', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR']\n", + "selected: ['AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR']\n", + "ionosphere\n", + "tops: ['LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'DeepSVDD']\n", + "selected: ['LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE']\n", + "wbc\n", + "tops: ['AutoEncoder', 'AnoGAN', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'DeepSVDD']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR']\n", + "glass\n", + "tops: ['LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'AnoGAN', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "selected: ['LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR']\n", + "satimage-2\n", + "tops: ['VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'MO-GAAL', 'AnoGAN', 'DeepSVDD']\n", + "selected: ['AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'ALAD', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "vertebral\n", + "tops: ['AnoGAN', 'SO-GAAL', 'DevNet', 'MO-GAAL', 'ALAD']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE']\n", + "\n", + "Overall Accuracy: 0.75\n", + "\n", + "LLM's Selection Accuracy per Dataset:\n", + "pima: 13 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.26\n", + "cardio: 45 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.90\n", + "mnist: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "arrhythmia: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "pendigits: 13 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.26\n", + "shuttle: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "letter: 49 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.98\n", + "musk: 49 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.98\n", + "vowels: 46 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.92\n", + "optdigits: 8 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.16\n", + "satellite: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "lympho: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "ionosphere: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "wbc: 44 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.88\n", + "glass: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "satimage-2: 22 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.44\n", + "vertebral: 0 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.00\n" + ] + }, + { + "data": { + "image/png": "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", + "text/plain": [ + "
" + ] + }, + "metadata": {}, + "output_type": "display_data" + } + ], + "source": [ + "top_n = 5\n", + "# Extract the list of model columns\n", + "model_columns = roc_df.columns[4:] \n", + "top5_models_per_dataset = {}\n", + "\n", + "for index, row in roc_df.iterrows():\n", + " dataset = row['Data']\n", + " # Get the ROC values for the models\n", + " model_scores = row[model_columns]\n", + " top5_models = model_scores.sort_values(ascending=False).head(top_n + 1).index.tolist()\n", + " top5_models.remove('Outlier Perc')\n", + " top5_models_per_dataset[dataset] = top5_models\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "llm_selected_models = experiment_results['output']\n", + "\n", + "# Extract the selected models for each dataset\n", + "selected_models_per_dataset = {}\n", + "\n", + "for dataset, selections in llm_selected_models.items():\n", + " selected_models = [entry['selected_model'] for entry in selections]\n", + " selected_models_per_dataset[dataset] = selected_models\n", + "\n", + "# Evaluate accuracy\n", + "correct_counts = {}\n", + "total_correct = 0\n", + "total_selections = 0\n", + "\n", + "for dataset, selected_models in selected_models_per_dataset.items():\n", + " top5 = top5_models_per_dataset.get(dataset, [])\n", + " print(dataset)\n", + " print(\"tops:\", top5)\n", + " print('selected: ', selected_models)\n", + " correct = sum([1 for model in selected_models if model in top5])\n", + " total = len(selected_models)\n", + " accuracy = correct / total if total > 0 else 0\n", + " correct_counts[dataset] = {'correct': correct, 'total': total, 'accuracy': accuracy}\n", + " # Accumulate total correct and total selections\n", + " total_correct += correct\n", + " total_selections += total\n", + "\n", + "# Calculate overall accuracy\n", + "overall_accuracy = total_correct / total_selections if total_selections > 0 else 0\n", + "print(f\"\\nOverall Accuracy: {overall_accuracy:.2f}\")\n", + "\n", + "# Display the evaluation results per dataset\n", + "print(\"\\nLLM's Selection Accuracy per Dataset:\")\n", + "for dataset, counts in correct_counts.items():\n", + " print(f\"{dataset}: {counts['correct']} out of {counts['total']} correct, Accuracy: {counts['accuracy']:.2f}\")\n", + "\n", + "# Step 4: Visualize the Results\n", + "\n", + "# Convert the results into a DataFrame\n", + "accuracy_df = pd.DataFrame.from_dict(correct_counts, orient='index')\n", + "\n", + "# Reset index to turn the dataset names into a column\n", + "accuracy_df.reset_index(inplace=True)\n", + "accuracy_df.rename(columns={'index': 'Dataset'}, inplace=True)\n", + "\n", + "# Add overall accuracy to the DataFrame using pd.concat\n", + "overall_row = pd.DataFrame({\n", + " 'Dataset': ['Overall'],\n", + " 'correct': [total_correct],\n", + " 'total': [total_selections],\n", + " 'accuracy': [overall_accuracy]\n", + "})\n", + "\n", + "# Concatenate the overall accuracy row to the accuracy DataFrame\n", + "accuracy_df = pd.concat([accuracy_df, overall_row], ignore_index=True)\n", + "\n", + "# Plot the accuracy per dataset\n", + "plt.figure(figsize=(14, 6))\n", + "bars = plt.bar(accuracy_df['Dataset'], accuracy_df['accuracy'])\n", + "plt.xlabel('Dataset')\n", + "plt.ylabel('Accuracy')\n", + "plt.title('LLM Model Selection Accuracy per Dataset')\n", + "plt.xticks(rotation=45)\n", + "plt.ylim(0, 1)\n", + "plt.grid(axis='y')\n", + "\n", + "# Add accuracy labels on top of each bar\n", + "for bar, acc in zip(bars, accuracy_df['accuracy']):\n", + " yval = bar.get_height()\n", + " plt.text(bar.get_x() + bar.get_width()/2.0, yval + 0.02, f'{acc:.2f}', ha='center', va='bottom')\n", + "\n", + "plt.tight_layout()\n", + "plt.show()" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "markdown", + "metadata": {}, + "source": [ + "### Comparison (without additional notes)" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 24, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "def select_model_datasets(output_file='without_note_selection_results/output.json', repeat=1, api_key=OPENAI_API_KEY):\n", + " \"\"\"\n", + " Runs auto-selection for all datasets and store the results into a json file\n", + "\n", + " Parameters:\n", + " - output_file: output file location\n", + " - repeat: number of times to run for each dataset\n", + " - api_key: API key for the LLM\n", + " \n", + " Prints each selected model and reason and store them\n", + " \"\"\"\n", + " dataset_paths = get_datasets()\n", + " datasets = {}\n", + " \n", + " for dataset_path in dataset_paths:\n", + " mat = loadmat(dataset_path)\n", + " selector = AutoModelSelector(dataset=mat['X'], api_key=api_key)\n", + " result_list = []\n", + "\n", + " dataset_name = os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(dataset_path))[0]\n", + " print(f\"Current dataset: {dataset_name}\")\n", + " print('\\n')\n", + " \n", + " for i in range(repeat):\n", + " print(f\"Repeat: {i+1}\")\n", + " selected_model, reason = selector.model_auto_select()\n", + " if selected_model != None and reason != None:\n", + " result_list.append({\"selected_model\": selected_model, \"reason\": reason})\n", + "\n", + " datasets[dataset_name] = result_list\n", + " print('\\n\\n')\n", + "\n", + " # Write to JSON file\n", + " with open(output_file, \"w\") as json_file:\n", + " json.dump(datasets, json_file, indent=4)\n", + "\n", + " return" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 28, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "name": "stdout", + "output_type": "stream", + "text": [ + "Current dataset: pima\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"imbalanced data\", \"noisy data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it handles tabular and imbalanced data well, which aligns with the dataset properties. Although it is weak with noisy data, the low memory requirement and ability to scale to larger datasets make it a suitable choice given the medium data size and low memory requirement of the dataset. LUNAR also has a short training time, which is advantageous. Other models either require high memory or have significant weaknesses in dealing with tabular or imbalanced data.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it effectively handles tabular and imbalanced data, which are primary characteristics of the dataset. It also operates well under low memory constraints, which is a vital requirement. Although it has limitations with noisy data, it is scalable, offers short training times, and strengths that fit the given dataset characteristics better than other models. Given the trade-offs, LUNAR's short training time and scalability make it the most suitable model given the dataset's conditions.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It handles imbalanced and tabular data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Despite its weakness with noisy data, it is better suited compared to the other models because it supports imbalanced data, which is a critical factor. Additionally, it is well-optimized for high dimensionality and can handle sparse data, both potentially beneficial for medium-sized datasets. While there is a trade-off with some of the dataset requirements like low memory, its strengths in relevant dataset characteristics make it the best candidate from the given model list.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it handles tabular data and imbalanced datasets effectively. Although it isn't optimized for noisy data, it excels in other necessary conditions like handling medium-sized datasets, which align with the dataset's characteristics. It supports GPU for better performance while managing high dimensionality and short training times, albeit with a higher memory requirement. Given that many other models struggle significantly with either tabular or imbalanced data, AE1SVM provides the best fit from the options available considering the needs for low memory and imbalanced, noisy data handling.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is best suited for this dataset because it specifically handles tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It is also efficient in terms of memory usage, making it appropriate given the additional requirement for low memory. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, it remains the best option among the available models considering its overall strengths in the context of the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset characteristics include medium-sized, tabular, imbalanced, and noisy data with a requirement for low memory. Among the given models, VAE is suitable because it supports tabular data and handles noisy data well. While VAE has weaknesses with imbalanced data, it is one of the few models that match tabular and noisy data needs. Also, it has efficient scalability and relatively short training times, accommodating the medium-sized data constraint. Although it has a high memory requirement, it balances the dataset's needs better than alternative models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is specifically designed for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is capable of handling imbalanced data which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR has low memory requirements, fulfilling the additional requirements of low memory usage. While it is sensitive to hyperparameter tuning, its strengths closely align with the main characteristics of the dataset, making it an appropriate choice.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it demonstrates strengths with tabular and imbalanced data, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also handles sparse data efficiently and offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, meeting the 'low memory' requirement. Despite its weakness with noisy data, it is the best fit among the options provided, balancing memory constraints and data requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties and constraints. It is explicitly designed to handle tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which are key characteristics of the dataset. LUNAR also offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which fits well with the medium data size requirement. Additionally, it supports imbalanced data effectively. Although it has weaknesses like sensitivity to noisy data and high memory requirements, it aligns better with the dataset's need for a low memory model when compared to other models on the list. Overall, LUNAR balances the requirements for handling tabular, imbalanced data efficiently while ensuring scalability and reasonable resource usage.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data, which matches the data type in the dataset. It also handles noisy data effectively, which is important given the dataset's characteristics. Although the dataset is imbalanced, ALAD's flexibility in handling both noisy and sparse data makes it a viable option. ALAD can also run on a GPU, aligning with the low memory requirement and scalability needs.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is most suitable for this medium-sized tabular dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular and imbalanced data while meeting the low memory requirement and having a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data, it can effectively manage the imbalanced nature of the dataset and is scalable to large datasets, which makes it a good overall fit given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is chosen because it supports tabular data and can handle both noisy and imbalanced datasets, which are critical characteristics of the dataset. Despite its high memory requirement, ALAD's capability for scalability to large datasets and its proficiency in handling noisy data align well with the dataset's medium size and noisy nature. While it requires high memory, it does not have the low memory constraint as a primary weakness, unlike some other models in the list. Overall, ALAD offers a suitable balance between addressing noisy and imbalanced data while being compatible with tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected as the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, which are important characteristics of the given dataset. It also supports large datasets, which aligns well with the medium data size. Although it has a weakness with imbalanced data, which is present in the dataset, other models such as AutoEncoder could have been suitable but are hindered by their weakness with imbalanced data to a greater degree. VAE's ability to handle high dimensionality and to train quickly with GPU support are additional advantages, despite the weakness in handling imbalanced data, making it a balanced choice given these constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is chosen because it handles tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset type. It is also capable of dealing with noisy data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Although it requires high memory and has a long training time, it addresses the main challenges of imbalanced and noisy data, which are crucial for this dataset. Other models either do not support tabular data well or perform poorly with noisy and imbalanced datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is well-suited for tabular data and can handle noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset. Although it requires high memory, its ability to scale to large datasets and handle imbalanced data make it a favorable option given the medium data size and specific focus. Additionally, it effectively supports high-dimensionality data and noisy contexts, which are critical considering the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the best choice for the given dataset properties because it handles tabular data effectively and supports imbalanced datasets, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also requires lower memory and offers short training time, addressing the additional low memory requirement. While it has weaknesses with noisy data, these concerns are outweighed by its strengths in handling imbalanced tabular datasets with a low memory constraint.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it is strong in handling tabular data, which fits the dataset's data type. Additionally, it supports noisy data, which is another characteristic of the dataset. It handles imbalanced data and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset's imbalanced and medium size nature. ALAD's weaknesses are not highly relevant as they pertain to areas like small data sizes or specific data types (e.g., time series, audio) that aren't part of the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data, particularly given the imbalanced nature of the dataset. Although it has some weaknesses with noisy data, it effectively handles imbalanced and sparse data, which is crucial here. AE1SVM also supports high dimensionality and has a short training time, making it appropriate for datasets with low memory requirements. Given the dataset’s characteristics and the model's strengths, AE1SVM emerges as the most suitable choice among the options listed.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It is well-suited for tabular data and performs effectively on imbalanced datasets, which is a key characteristic of the provided dataset. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the need for low memory usage. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, its strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data, combined with its compatibility with tabular formats, make it the best option despite the presence of noise in the data.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular data and imbalanced datasets, matching the dataset's characteristics. It offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is ideal given the medium data size and low memory requirement. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, other models are much less suited for imbalanced tabular data with low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is chosen because it has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is one of the key dataset characteristics. It also supports GPU and has a short training time, addressing the need for low memory usage. Although it has some weaknesses with noisy data, its other strengths align better with the dataset requirements compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the best choice given the dataset properties as it excels in handling tabular data, imbalance, and short training time, which aligns with the medium-sized and imbalanced nature of the dataset. It is computationally efficient, suitable for low memory requirements, and handles imbalanced data effectively, despite its minor weakness in dealing with noisy data.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it effectively handles imbalanced and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. While the dataset is medium in size, AE1SVM supports high dimensionality and short training time which compensates for the medium data size. Additionally, it addresses the need for low memory usage. Although it struggles with noisy data, its other strengths align better with the dataset properties compared to the other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it is designed to handle tabular data effectively. It is also particularly strong with imbalanced data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Furthermore, LUNAR operates with low memory usage and offers short training time, making it compatible with the dataset's additional low memory requirement. Despite its weakness in dealing with noisy data, the model's advantages align better with the dataset's needs compared to other models, making it the best option among the given models.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it aligns well with the dataset characteristics and requirements. It is designed for tabular data and has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets, has a short training time, and utilizes GPU, aligning with the dataset's medium size and need for low memory usage. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data, its strengths in other areas make it the most suitable model from the list given these constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it is designed to handle tabular data effectively, which is a key characteristic of the current dataset. It is also capable of managing noisy data, which is crucial given the dataset's noisy nature. While ALAD typically requires high memory, this weakness is less severe compared to the incompatibility of other models with imbalanced and tabular data, which are primary requirements here. Moreover, ALAD is scalable to large datasets, accommodates high dimensionality, and its strength in dealing with sparse data is an advantage for the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it is strong in handling imbalanced and tabular data, which fits the dataset tags. Despite its weakness with noisy data and low memory requirements, it has the strengths needed in this medium-sized dataset, including short training time and scalability to large datasets. These characteristics outweigh its weaknesses compared to other models, which either struggle significantly with imbalanced data or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is chosen because it effectively handles tabular data and is robust to imbalanced data, which are critical factors given the dataset characteristics. It also supports high dimensionality and has short training time, which is advantageous for handling noisy data. While AE1SVM has weaknesses related to low memory, the strength in handling imbalanced data in tabular form outweighs this drawback for the dataset at hand.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AE1SVM model is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling imbalanced and tabular data, aligning well with the dataset characteristics. It also supports high dimensionality, which can be beneficial in managing the noisy data present in the dataset. Despite its weaknesses in dealing with noisy data, the additional requirement of scalability to medium data size and high-pass memory utilization align with the AE1SVM model strengths. Among models focusing on tabular and imbalanced data, AE1SVM appears to be the most compatible given the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it is highly suitable for tabular data and imbalanced datasets, both being key characteristics of the given dataset. It also excels in handling sparse data, which can be useful if the dataset has many missing values. Furthermore, LUNAR offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which can effectively manage a medium data size while fulfilling the requirement of low memory usage compared to alternatives. Although LUNAR has a weakness for high memory usage, it is compensated by its scalability and ability to deal with imbalanced data without being overly sensitive to noise.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it handles tabular data well and is robust against imbalanced datasets, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data and low memory, it efficiently processes high dimensional and imbalanced data, making it a suitable choice considering the dataset properties of being medium-sized, with tabular, imbalanced, and noisy attributes. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the requirement for low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected as it aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It specifically handles tabular and imbalanced data effectively while requiring low memory usage, all fitting within the medium-sized dataset requirement. Although LUNAR has a weakness with noisy data, its strengths in handling tabular and imbalanced data combined with short training time make it a suitable choice given the dataset's constraints and features.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for this dataset because it handles tabular data and imbalanced data well, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It performs well with high dimensionality and is supportive of short training times. Additionally, AE1SVM is capable of managing large datasets effectively, although memory usage might be a potential concern, it aligns with the need for low memory solutions better than the other options. While it does have a weakness with noisy data, the combination of strengths for this specific dataset makes it the most suitable choice from the list provided.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for the given dataset as it handles tabular and imbalanced data effectively, matches the requirement for low memory usage, and offers short training times, which is beneficial given the medium dataset size. While it struggles with noisy data, other models have more critical weaknesses against the dataset requirements, such as high memory demands or incompatibility with tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is most suitable for the given dataset as it excels with tabular and imbalanced data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also handles high dimensionality well, which is beneficial for noisy data. Despite its weakness with low memory requirements, it strikes a good balance between dealing with noisy and imbalanced data compared to other models. Additionally, its strength in short training time and ability to scale to large datasets align well with the medium-sized dataset needs.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data and can handle imbalanced datasets effectively, matching the dataset's characteristics. It also features short training time and low memory usage, which satisfies the additional requirement for low memory. While it has weaknesses with noisy data, no model perfectly handles all dataset characteristics, and LUNAR offers a balance of strengths that are aligned with the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it handles imbalanced data and performs well on tabular data, which fits the dataset characteristics. Its strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and sparse data also align with the dataset needs. Despite its weakness against noisy data, which is a factor, AE1SVM does not have low memory issues like some alternatives and has a short training time, meeting the low memory and medium data size requirements effectively compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling imbalanced and tabular data, both of which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is designed for use with high dimensionality data and performs well under conditions with imbalanced data, aligning with the dataset characteristics. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data, this trade-off is mitigated by its short training time and scalability to large datasets, which are advantageous for a medium-sized dataset with low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It excels with tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and is specifically designed for imbalanced data, which is one of the key characteristics of the dataset. LUNAR also supports short training time and is scalable to large datasets, addressing the need for low memory usage. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data, its strengths align more closely with the dataset requirements compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice because it supports tabular data and handles imbalanced data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data, other models either lack support for imbalanced or tabular data or require high memory, which the dataset constraints do not support. Despite its high memory requirement, AE1SVM is capable of handling high dimensionality and is scalable to medium-sized datasets, making it a good fit overall.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, imbalanced, and contains noisy data with low memory requirements. LUNAR excels with tabular and imbalanced data, meeting the core needs of the dataset and operates in low memory environments. While it has a weakness with noisy data, its efficiency with imbalanced and tabular data, coupled with short training times and scalability, makes it the best choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, addresses imbalanced data, and works well with low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset's medium size and imbalanced nature. Although it has weaknesses concerning noisy data and high memory, its strengths in handling imbalanced data and short training time demonstrate good compatibility with the dataset's low memory requirement. Other models either have more severe weaknesses related to tabular data, imbalanced data, or noisy data, or require high memory resources.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is chosen because it is strong in handling tabular data and noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. Despite the imbalanced data challenge, ALAD is one of the models suitable for medium-sized and noisy tabular datasets. Its ability to scale to large datasets and GPU compatibility, coupled with a match for imbalanced data, makes it more suitable than others for this context. While others like VAE struggle with imbalanced data, and models like LUNAR cannot handle noisy data well, ALAD offers a balanced strength for the requirements, despite its occasional high memory use, which was a lesser priority.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the best choice given the dataset properties and model characteristics. It is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR can handle imbalanced data effectively, an important characteristic of the dataset. It also operates efficiently on medium-sized data sets that need low memory, offering scalability to larger datasets with short training times. While LUNAR has a weakness in handling noisy data, this is a minor drawback compared to other models which have more severe limitations with core requirements like imbalanced data or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It is also ideal for medium-sized datasets, which likely aligns with the 'medium' tag specified for the data size. Additionally, LUNAR supports short training times and scalability to large datasets, which compensates for the requirement of low memory, making it a more feasible option under the given constraints. Despite its weakness with noisy data, it balances out with other dataset requirements better than the other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is well-suited for imbalanced data and supports short training times, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data, it is the best option among the given models due to its strength with imbalanced datasets and tabular data format. While it doesn't explicitly list low memory usage as a strength, it does not have high memory as a listed requirement, unlike some other models. Additionally, it supports medium to large datasets, which fits the dataset size requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable selection considering the dataset properties and model characteristics. It excels in handling tabular and imbalanced data, which are key dataset characteristics. It also supports low-memory usage, a critical requirement in this scenario. Despite its weakness in handling noisy data, its strong ability to scale to large datasets with a short training time and effective handling of tabular and imbalanced data makes it the best fit among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties because it is specifically strong with tabular data and can handle imbalanced datasets, which are key characteristics of the dataset in question. Additionally, LUNAR offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, aligning with the requirement for low memory usage. Although it struggles with noisy data, among the options, its strengths in handling imbalanced tabular data make it a better choice than others with more significant weaknesses with respect to the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is effective with tabular data and handles imbalanced data well, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, LUNAR is optimized for low memory usage and has a short training time, which meets the additional dataset requirement for low memory consumption. While it has a potential weakness with noisy data, its strengths and alignment with other dataset needs make it the best choice from the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it effectively handles tabular and imbalanced data, which are the primary characteristics of the dataset. Despite having a weakness with noisy data, AE1SVM is strong in addressing imbalanced datasets and tabular data, making it a better fit compared to other models that struggle more significantly with these dataset attributes. While it does require high memory, the dataset's low memory requirement is a common issue across most models, and AE1SVM compensates with its scalability to large datasets and suitability for medium-sized tabular data.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: cardio\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"imbalanced data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset because it excels in handling tabular and imbalanced data, which are key characteristics of the dataset, and it is designed to work efficiently with a CPU. Additionally, it has the advantage of short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it well-suited for the medium-sized data. While it has weaknesses such as being computationally intensive, its strengths align more closely with the dataset's requirements compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is best suited for tabular data and is effective for imbalanced datasets, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the medium-sized dataset and the requirement for CPU use. Although it has some weaknesses, these do not conflict significantly with the dataset's properties, making it the most appropriate choice among the given options.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable choice as it is designed to handle imbalanced data effectively and is suitable for tabular data. Despite its reliance on GPU for strength, it can be performant on CPU as well if the data size is medium, as in this case. While it has limited scalability, the dataset is of medium size, which aligns well with its capabilities. Although some weaknesses were mentioned, none directly conflict with the dataset tags or additional requirements provided, making it more apt than other models on the list.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is chosen because it excels in handling imbalanced data, which is a critical characteristic of the dataset. Although it has a weakness in dealing with noisy data and real-time data (which are not part of the dataset tags), it effectively addresses the needs of tabular data as well. The model also benefits from a short training time, which is advantageous when CPU is an additional requirement. Despite its limited scalability, the medium-sized dataset should fit within its capabilities.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable model given the dataset properties as it is strong in handling imbalanced data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. While it is noted for strengths with GPUs, it also offers short training times, which can help alleviate potential CPU constraints. Although its weakness includes limited scalability, the dataset size is medium, making it a feasible choice overall compared to the other models, which have weaknesses more directly aligned with the dataset's characteristics, such as CPU requirements or tabular data handling.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets with imbalanced data, which matches the dataset properties. It is optimized for imbalanced data, tabular data, and can be run on CPU, which is a requirement based on the additional needs. Additionally, LUNAR offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it an efficient choice given the data characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is well-suited for handling tabular data and specifically addresses imbalanced datasets, which is a key characteristic of the given dataset. Despite relying on GPU, its capability to work with imbalanced data makes it the best fit compared to other models which are either unsuitable for tabular or imbalanced data, rely heavily on GPU, or have strong weaknesses in such aspects. Moreover, it offers short training time, which aligns well with the requirement for CPU-based processing.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is most suitable for this dataset because it specifically handles imbalanced data, which is a critical characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, it is capable of handling medium-sized datasets and performs well with tabular data. While its strengths are generally enhanced by GPU usage, it can still be used effectively for computations on a CPU. Its short training time is advantageous for efficient model optimization. Despite its lack of scalability for very large datasets, this limitation is not a concern given the dataset's medium size.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is a critical characteristic of the dataset. Despite the requirement for CPU, its capability to manage medium-sized tabular data and imbalanced data makes it a better fit compared to other models that either struggle with tabular data or have weaknesses dealing with imbalances. Moreover, SO-GAAL has a short training time which complements the medium data size constraint.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the best choice for this dataset because it handles tabular data and is specifically designed to manage imbalanced data, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It also has a short training time and can be executed using CPU resources, aligning well with the additional requirement for CPU. Despite some weaknesses with noisy data and high memory, its strengths match the dataset properties more closely than the other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is selected because it has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It is suitable for tabular data and has a short training time. Although it does have weaknesses in scalability and noisy data, its ability to manage imbalanced datasets outweighs these drawbacks given the dataset's medium size. The requirement for CPU does not strongly align with any model's strengths, but SO-GAAL's short training time could mitigate performance concerns on CPU. Overall, SO-GAAL strikes the best balance between the dataset's needs and model capabilities.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is selected due to its strengths in handling imbalanced data and its applicability to tabular data, both of which align with the characteristics of the dataset. Although it requires GPU for optimal performance, it has a short training time which is beneficial given the medium-sized data. While it does require a GPU which isn't specified in the CPU requirement, it still balances the scales appropriately among the available models considering the dataset's imbalanced nature.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice for the given dataset as it handles tabular data and imbalanced datasets effectively, which are key characteristics of the dataset in question. Additionally, LUNAR is a good fit because it can be operated with a CPU and offers a scalable solution with short training time, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. While LUNAR has weaknesses in handling high memory and sensitivity to hyperparameters, these are not highlighted as critical factors in the dataset, making it a more appropriate choice than other models with more severe weaknesses in this context.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it supports tabular data and handles imbalanced data effectively. It has a strength in scalable to large datasets with short training time, which fits the medium data size requirement on a CPU. Although it can be computationally intensive, its strengths align well with the dataset characteristics, especially for handling sparse and imbalanced data.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable model because it handles imbalanced data effectively, which is one of the key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it works well with tabular data, and although it typically utilizes a GPU, its relative advantages with imbalanced data make it the best option available. While the data requirements specify CPU, SO-GAAL's strengths align closely with the dataset's needs compared to the other models.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is designed to handle tabular and imbalanced data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It performs well on imbalanced datasets, is suitable for CPU use, and offers short training times. Despite needing high memory, LUNAR's ability to deal with sparse and low-dimensional datasets along with scalability to large datasets aligns well with the dataset's medium size and characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is chosen because it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics of being tabular and imbalanced. While it is optimized for GPU, which doesn’t perfectly match the requirement for CPU, it still provides strong support for handling imbalanced data. It also offers a short training time, which can mitigate the computational cost associated with CPU use. The weaknesses associated with SO-GAAL such as limited scalability and issues with noisy data are less of a concern given the dataset size is medium and no explicit noise characteristics were indicated.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is a suitable choice because it is designed to handle tabular data and is particularly strong when dealing with imbalanced datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags provided. Additionally, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets and offers short training times, which is beneficial since we are restricted to CPU usage. Despite some potential computational intensity, its strengths complement the dataset's characteristics better than the other models, particularly in handling the imbalance and providing efficient training.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is selected because it specifically addresses the key dataset characteristic of 'imbalanced data', which is crucial given the dataset tags. While it has some weaknesses, such as limited scalability, it aligns well with using a 'medium' sized, 'tabular data' and can operate effectively on a 'CPU'. Its ability to handle imbalanced data greatly outweighs its limitations in this context, making it the most suitable choice from the model list provided.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable model for this dataset as it handles imbalanced data well, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, SO-GAAL is effective for tabular data and operates efficiently on a CPU, matching the dataset's additional requirement. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data and small datasets, these do not conflict with the dataset's characteristics, making it a fit for the given medium-sized tabular dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable model since it has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It is also capable of processing tabular data effectively. While it typically prefers GPU for operations, its short training time is beneficial given the CPU requirement. Despite some weaknesses such as limited scalability, the medium size of the dataset makes SO-GAAL a more appropriate choice compared to other models that have significant weaknesses related to imbalanced or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset as it handles tabular data effectively, which fits the dataset's data type. It is robust to imbalanced data, a key characteristic of the dataset, and it supports CPU, which satisfies the additional requirement. The model's strengths align well with the dataset properties, making it a fitting choice among the available options, despite its long training time on CPU and some other weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is a suitable choice because it excels in handling medium-sized, tabular datasets with imbalanced data, which aligns with the dataset tags provided. While SO-GAAL has a weakness for real-time and noisy data, these are not primary concerns based on the dataset properties highlighted. Additionally, its strength in handling imbalanced data is a key requirement for this dataset, making it the most fitting option from the list.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this task considering the dataset characteristics. It is specifically strong in handling tabular data and imbalanced data, which are key properties of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR is optimized for short training time and is scalable to large datasets. While the model uses GPU, which is not ideal due to the CPU requirement, its ability to efficiently handle imbalanced and tabular datasets makes it a better fit than others in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model as it is specifically designed to handle tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which match the dataset characteristics. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which is beneficial given the medium data size. Although it typically prefers a GPU, the strengths related to data imbalance and tabular data make it the best option from the list, considering the CPU requirement is less critical for the model's performance compared to its strengths.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is suitable for medium-sized, tabular datasets with imbalanced data, which matches the dataset properties. Its ability to handle short training times and handle imbalanced data makes it apt in this case. However, it should be noted that it typically requires a GPU, but since CPU is mentioned in additional requirements, it would work if GPU is available. While the use of CPU might not fully leverage SO-GAAL to its full potential, it's still the best match compared to others given the circumstances.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable choice for the given dataset as it specifically handles imbalanced data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, it supports medium-sized tabular data effectively, aligning well with the dataset properties. Although it has limitations with noisy data and scalability, it still provides short training time and addresses imbalanced data efficiently, making it a better fit than others under the provided constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is characterized by medium-sized, tabular data and is imbalanced. While the models need to have strengths in dealing with tabular data and imbalanced conditions, they must also run efficiently on a CPU. LUNAR is specifically strong at handling tabular data, sparse data, and imbalanced datasets, which suits the dataset characteristics well. Although it is computationally intensive, its scalability to large datasets and short training time make it a practical choice given the medium data size. Additionally, LUNAR does not have CPU constraints listed as a significant weakness, making it more adaptable to such a requirement compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is strong with imbalanced data and compatible with medium-sized tabular data, important factors for this dataset. Additionally, its capability for fast training on GPUs makes it favorable despite the preference for CPU, as it provides rapid and efficient learning suitable for non-GPU environments too. Although it has weaknesses in noisy data and small datasets, these do not align with our current dataset characteristics, making it a fitting choice.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is selected because it effectively handles imbalanced data, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Despite being designed for GPU usage, it has a short training time, making it suitable for CPU, especially when considering the weaknesses of other models for imbalanced tabular data. SO-GAAL provides the best compromise between strengths and addressing the dataset's requirements, despite its limitations with noisy and real-time data, which are not significant factors here.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it specifically aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is designed to handle tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. Additionally, LUNAR supports CPU usage, which is an additional requirement, and it also offers short training times and scalability to larger datasets. While its weaknesses include high memory and hyperparameter sensitivity, these are outweighed by its strengths in handling the specified dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It specifically supports tabular data and is effective for imbalanced data, which are both key characteristics of the given dataset. Additionally, LUNAR is executable on a CPU while still offering short training times and scalability to large datasets, aligning well with the 'CPU' constraint. Its ability to handle sparse data and scalability further complements the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is particularly suitable for handling imbalanced tabular datasets, which aligns with the 'imbalanced data' tag in the dataset. Despite its limited scalability, it has strengths in dealing with medium-sized datasets with imbalanced characteristics and requires a short training time, which is beneficial given the 'CPU' requirement. This makes it a better choice compared to other models, which either do not handle imbalanced data well or are not suitable for tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data, characterized by imbalance and requires CPU compatibility. SO-GAAL is designed to handle imbalanced data effectively, which is a critical characteristic of this dataset. Although it is generally more suitable for GPUs, it has strengths with short training times and does not severely conflict with the CPU requirement. Other models like VAE, AE1SVM, ALAD, and AutoEncoder have weaknesses related to imbalanced data or CPU compatibility. Therefore, SO-GAAL is the most suitable choice given its ability to address the dataset's imbalance and size efficiently.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is of medium size, tabular, and imbalanced, with a requirement to operate on a CPU. Among the available models, LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. Additionally, it provides a short training time, which is advantageous when computational resources are limited to a CPU. While LUNAR prefers a GPU, its strengths in handling the specific dataset characteristics of tabular and imbalanced data make it the best option from the provided list.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it specifically addresses the issue of imbalanced data, which is a notable characteristic of the dataset. Although it uses a GPU and is generally efficient for short training times, the requirement for CPU is a constraint; however, other models with CPU compatibility have significant weaknesses in managing imbalanced data. Despite its limited scalability, it is well suited for medium-sized tabular datasets as specified by the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable model considering the dataset properties. The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with a characteristic of being imbalanced, and it requires CPU. Among the available models, SO-GAAL specifically has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is a crucial requirement. Although its strengths are not focused on tabular data, it effectively handles image and finance data, indicating versatility in data types. Additionally, its weakness in real-time data and noisy data are not concerns for this dataset. Considering the dataset's requirements for imbalanced data handling and computational limitations (CPU), SO-GAAL is an appropriate choice despite its less specified strengths in this context.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is strong in handling tabular and imbalanced data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. The model is also suitable for CPU environments and offers short training time, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets, which is beneficial for a medium-sized dataset. Although LUNAR has weaknesses like high memory usage and hyperparameter sensitivity, these are outweighed by its strengths in handling the specific dataset characteristics mentioned.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data with characteristics of imbalanced datasets. It has strengths in handling imbalanced and sparse data, making it suitable for the dataset's characteristics. Although it is computationally intensive, it satisfies the CPU requirement better than models that are explicitly GPU-dependent. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, matching the dataset's medium size requirement. While other models may also work with tabular data, LUNAR's ability to handle imbalanced data effectively gives it an edge for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is selected because it is specifically strong in handling imbalanced data and is efficient with medium-sized tabular datasets, which matches well with the dataset properties. While its reliance on GPU is a minor drawback as CPU is preferred, its ability to handle imbalanced data is critical here, outweighing the limitation of CPU preference in this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is well-suited for the given dataset properties as it is designed to handle tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which are key characteristics of the dataset in question. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time making it efficient on CPU systems, and it is scalable to medium-sized datasets, meeting all the outlined requirements. While the model has a weakness in handling noisy data and being computationally intensive, this is less of a concern given its strengths align closely with the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, imbalanced, and requires a CPU-friendly model. LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, effectively handles imbalanced data, and supports scalable solutions, essential for the medium-sized dataset. Despite its GPU preference, it has a short training time, which could compensate for CPU usage needs. Considering these characteristics, LUNAR aligns well with the dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is best suited for the given dataset because it handles tabular and imbalanced data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. While it has limitations with noisy data and small datasets, the dataset size here is medium, and it emphasizes CPU usage, a common requirement for SO-GAAL. Its strengths in handling imbalanced data and short training time align well with the dataset's characteristics and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable model based on the dataset's characteristics. It has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is a critical aspect of the dataset. Although it requires a GPU for best performance, it can work with CPU as well. The dataset's medium size fits SO-GAAL well as it is not suited for small datasets. Furthermore, its ability to handle tabular data, coupled with a short training time, makes it suitable for the available computational resources which prefer CPU. Overall, SO-GAAL aligns well with the dataset properties compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model because it is well-suited for tabular and imbalanced data, which fits the dataset characteristics. It offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which aligns with the medium data size and requirement for CPU resources. Though it is computationally intensive, its strengths in handling imbalanced datasets and tabular data make it a better fit than other models given the dataset's properties.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it is specifically well-suited for tabular data and imbalanced data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it operates efficiently with CPU resources and offers short training times, satisfying the additional requirements. Despite having a computationally intensive nature and being sensitive to hyperparameters, LUNAR's strengths align closely with the dataset needs better than the other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and model characteristics. It is effective for handling imbalanced data, which is crucial for this dataset. Although it primarily benefits from GPU, it has a short training time and can work with a medium-sized dataset. While it has some limitations, such as limited scalability and issues with noisy data, the emphasis on handling imbalanced data and compatibility with tabular data makes it a preferable choice given the options available.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and imbalanced, with a requirement for CPU processing. LUNAR is well-suited for tabular and imbalanced data, has a short training time, and can scale to large datasets, which is beneficial given the medium size of the dataset. Although LUNAR is typically associated with GPU usage, it meets more of the dataset's characteristics and requirements compared to other models in the list, specifically handling tabular and imbalanced data effectively. Additionally, LUNAR's strengths in finance and cybersecurity domains suggest robust handling of imbalanced data scenarios, aligning it well with the dataset's needs, despite the CPU preference.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable model because it handles imbalanced data well, which is a primary characteristic of the dataset. Although it typically utilizes a GPU, it is designed to work with tabular data and offers short training times, addressing the computational constraints of CPU. Other models either have weaknesses in handling imbalanced data or are not optimized for tabular data. Additionally, the dataset size is medium, which aligns well with SO-GAAL's capabilities, as it is intended for such data proportions.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: SO-GAAL\n", + "Reason to choose this model: SO-GAAL is the most suitable choice given the dataset's characteristics. It handles imbalanced data effectively, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. While the dataset is tabular, SO-GAAL's strengths in short training time and ability to manage medium-sized datasets align well with the requirement for CPU usage, since it does not specifically mention a requirement for GPU.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: mnist\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"large\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"noisy data\", \"high dimensionality\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\", \"high memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality with noisy data, which matches well with the strengths of the AutoEncoder. It is particularly well-suited for high-dimensional and noisy tabular data, as it handles high memory requirements well and is scalable to large datasets. Furthermore, it requires relatively short training time, making it efficient for large datasets on a setup with high memory, even though it utilizes GPU effectively. Although it does require high memory, this aligns with the dataset's requirement, which calls for a model that can efficiently leverage high memory availability.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which align well with the dataset properties. It is also scalable to large datasets and operates efficiently with high memory, both of which are relevant given the dataset requirements. Despite its weakness in imbalanced data, it meets more dataset criteria than the other models, particularly compared to those with further weaknesses in CPU performance or longer training times.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is a suitable choice for this dataset given its strengths in handling high-dimensional, tabular, and noisy data, as well as its capability to scale to large datasets with short training times. It also aligns with the dataset's requirement for high memory availability and absence of necessity for real-time processing, which compensates for its weakness in those areas. Its advantages outweigh its weaknesses for the given dataset characteristics and computational requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is designed to handle tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns directly with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it can work efficiently with large datasets and has short training time, making it appropriate for high-memory computing environments which align with the dataset requirements. Although a GPU is preferable, high memory is mentioned as a requirement, which AutoEncoder also supports.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE, or Variational Autoencoder, is the most suitable model for the dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data. Although it prefers GPU, it is also compatible with high memory requirements, making it a fit given the additional CPU and memory constraints. VAE's short training time and scalability to large datasets further align with the dataset characteristics of large size and high dimensionality, despite its incompatibility with CPU preference, which will have to be managed.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset properties, which include tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, along with the requirement for large data size compatibility on a CPU with high memory. It effectively handles high dimensionality and noisy data, is scalable to large datasets, and operates well on tabular data. While it does require a GPU for optimal performance, its ability to manage high memory and efficiently train on large datasets makes it the most suitable model among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it handles high dimensional and noisy tabular data effectively. It is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the 'large' data size tag. Additionally, it supports high memory usage, which is an additional requirement. Despite some weaknesses like handling small data sizes and real-time data, these do not apply here, making AutoEncoder the best choice among the listed models.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy tabular data, both of which are characteristics of the given dataset. It is capable of utilizing GPU and high memory, aligning with the CPU and high memory requirements. Additionally, the AutoEncoder can efficiently handle large datasets with short training times and scalability. Despite its weakness in handling imbalanced data, this aligns more closely with the dataset properties and demands compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice because it is strong with tabular data and high-dimensional, noisy datasets, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It also supports large data sizes and operates well with high memory and GPU resources, fitting the additional computational requirements. Although it has weaknesses in handling imbalanced data, this is not a primary concern based on the dataset tags provided. Its short training time and scalability make it efficient for large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset characteristics. It handles tabular and high-dimensional data proficiently, both of which are important given the dataset type and characteristics. It also deals well with noisy data and large datasets, which are pertinent for the current sample as well. Additionally, the AutoEncoder can leverage high memory availability and provides a short training time, which are crucial given the additional requirements. While it does not excel with imbalanced data and CPU preference, the other important dataset characteristics align well, making it the best available option from the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is suited for large, tabular datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches well with the dataset properties. It also supports large datasets and high memory, which aligns with the resource requirements. Additionally, it provides high scalability and short training time. Although it has some weaknesses like imbalanced data, these are less relevant compared to the advantages it offers for the specified dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for the given dataset because it supports high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it performs well with tabular data and large datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. VAE also has high memory requirements, matching the additional requirements specified. While it has a weakness with CPU usage, the strengths align well with the critical features of the dataset, making it the most suitable model overall among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. Additionally, it is efficient with high memory usage and short training time, suitable for the available CPU and high memory resources.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is best suited for the provided dataset properties as it can handle large, high-dimensional, and noisy tabular data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset tags like 'large', 'tabular data', 'noisy data', and 'high dimensionality'. It is also scalable and has a short training time, addressing the computational requirements specified. Other models have explicit weaknesses or less suitability in terms of either tabular data handling, CPU constraints, or dealing with noise and high dimensionality effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected because it is well-suited for large, high-dimensional, tabular data with noisy characteristics. It is capable of handling large datasets efficiently with high memory and GPU support. Despite having some weaknesses with imbalanced data, it aligns best with the dataset characteristics, especially given the requirement for high memory utilization on CPU architecture. Its scalability, short training time, and ability to handle noisy data make it the most suitable option among the listed models.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable for the described dataset as it effectively handles tabular data and high dimensionality, both of which match the dataset tags. It is also equipped to deal with noisy data, aligns well with the requirement for scalability to large datasets, and makes efficient use of high memory available. Though it primarily operates with GPU, the dataset requirement of CPU can be managed given its overall compatibility with other dataset properties. This makes it the best fit among the options available in the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational AutoEncoder) is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and requirements. The dataset is large with high dimensional and noisy tabular data, which VAE is strong at handling. Additionally, VAE is capable of utilizing high memory and provides a short training time, making it efficient for large datasets. Although VAE may not perform well with discrete or categorical data and cannot run primarily on CPU, its strengths align well with the main dataset characteristics, making it the best choice among the listed models.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset has large size and tabular data characteristics with high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns well with the strengths of the VAE model. VAE is suited for high-dimensional, noisy tabular data and can handle large datasets efficiently with high memory, matching the dataset's requirement. Despite its weakness with CPU, the ability to utilize high memory makes it a suitable choice considering the tabular data and noise in the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset as it supports tabular data, handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset characteristics well. Additionally, it operates efficiently with high memory and GPU resources, which complements the additional requirements of this dataset. Despite its weaknesses with small data sizes and real-time data, these do not conflict with the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it handles tabular data effectively and is well-suited for datasets with high dimensionality, noisy data, and large size. It also benefits from short training times and scalability to large datasets, which matches the dataset requirements of handling high memory and using CPU. While it prefers GPU over CPU, its ability to effectively process high-dimensional, noisy, and large tabular datasets makes it the best choice among available models.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for the dataset because it supports tabular data, is effective with high-dimensional and noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets. It also leverages high memory resources which align with the dataset's high memory requirement, and it benefits from short training times. While VAE's use of CPUs can be a weakness, its strengths closely match the given dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is a strong candidate due to its ability to handle tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it supports large datasets and utilizes high memory, as per the dataset's additional requirements. The model's strengths in GPU utilization and having a short training time also match the dataset's needs, while its weaknesses do not negatively impact the dataset characteristics significantly.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It can handle tabular data effectively and is robust to noisy data and high dimensionality, which are important characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets, accommodates high memory requirements, and requires short training time, making it a good fit for CPU-based environments, even though it's not optimized for CPUs. Despite its weaknesses with small datasets and imbalanced data, these are not concerns for the current dataset, and the strengths align closely with the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is highly suitable for this application because it handles tabular data well, it is capable of managing high dimensionality, and it is robust against noisy data. Its strengths include working effectively with large datasets, leveraging high memory, and ensuring short training time. Even though it is GPU-oriented, which fits well with the requirement of handling high memory efficiently, it is still a better fit compared to other models whose weaknesses like CPU preference or exclusive support for small data sizes do not align with the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the best choice as it supports tabular data, handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, which align with the dataset's characteristics. It is also scalable to large datasets, suitable for high memory requirements, and efficient for short training times using a GPU, which fits well with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it has a weakness for CPU usage, the mention of 'high memory' suggests that a GPU is acceptable. Other models have critical weaknesses such as CPU preference or inability to deal with noisy data, making AutoEncoder a more suitable option given these dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for handling the given dataset properties. It supports tabular data and is capable of managing both high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it scales well to large datasets and works effectively with high memory resources, aligning well with the 'large' dataset size and 'high memory' requirements. While there is a need for CPU usage which is a weakness, the overall strengths such as short training time and ability to handle high dimensions and noise make it a strong fit for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model as it excels at handling high dimensionality and noisy tabular data. It is also scalable to large datasets and can utilize high memory, all of which align well with the dataset's properties. Despite the model's weakness in handling imbalanced and low-signal data, these issues are less critical given the dataset's descriptions, making AutoEncoder a suitable choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, matching the dataset characteristics. It supports high memory, can handle high dimensionality, and is scalable to large datasets, which is crucial given the dataset properties. Although it is not ideal for CPU-based environments, its strengths align well with the dataset's key properties, making it the most appropriate choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It excels at processing large tabular datasets, aligns well with the CPU and high memory requirements, and offers scalability to large datasets. While it has weaknesses with imbalanced data and low-signal data, these are not highlighted as issues in the current dataset context, making it the best fit compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for this dataset as it handles tabular data effectively and is robust against noisy data. It supports high-dimensional data and scales well to large datasets, which matches the dataset's characteristics of being large with high dimensionality and noise. Additionally, it offers high memory usage that complements the dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice given the dataset characterized by large, high-dimensional, tabular data with noise. It handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, is scalable to large datasets, and efficiently utilizes high memory environments. Although it requires high memory, it doesn't have notable weaknesses for large tabular datasets, unlike other models which have critical weaknesses for either tabular data, noisy data, or high memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It handles large tabular datasets well, supports high-dimensional and noisy data, and is designed to work efficiently with GPUs and high memory environments. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, meeting the dataset's requirement for handling high dimensionality and noise effectively. While it has some weaknesses, such as performance on small data and imbalanced data, these do not conflict with the current dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model as it handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, which align with the dataset characteristics. It supports tabular data, scales well with large datasets, and is optimized for high memory and GPU usage, meeting the additional requirements of the dataset. Although other models like ALAD and VAE also have relevant strengths, AutoEncoder's short training time makes it particularly adaptable and efficient for CPU-based environments, making it the best fit overall considering the dataset's properties and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable for this task because it handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, both of which are characteristics of the dataset. VAEs also support tabular data, which is the data type in question, and are efficient on large datasets with high memory usage, meeting the hardware requirements. Although it prefers GPU, its strengths align more closely with the dataset properties compared to the weaknesses in CPU usage and handling imbalanced data.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice because it is strong with tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data—all key characteristics of the dataset at hand. It is also efficient with large datasets and able to handle high memory requirements, aligning with the dataset's need for CPU and high memory. Additionally, AutoEncoder's short training time and scalability make it particularly well-suited for handling the large data size efficiently, addressing this dataset's requirements better than other options despite the presence of noise.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for handling large, high-dimensional, and noisy tabular data, which matches the dataset's properties of large size, high dimensionality, and noisy data. It is capable of utilizing high memory, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirement of high memory. Furthermore, AutoEncoder offers the advantage of a short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it an appropriate choice given the context of using CPU and handling a substantial dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling large, high-dimensional tabular data with noise. It is also capable of making use of the provided high memory and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset characteristics. AutoEncoder's short training time and the ability to perform on a GPU make it suitable for computational needs. Despite its weakness in managing imbalanced data, it does not require real-time processing or CPUs, aligning perfectly with the dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns closely with the dataset properties provided. It can handle large datasets and high dimensionality, both of which are present in the dataset. Despite its weakness with CPU requirements, the high memory strength and short training time make it suitable for the given computational constraints, allowing it to efficiently process and learn from the complex data structure.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It works well with tabular data, which is the type of data provided. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, offers short training times, and performs well with high memory requirements, significantly matching the described dataset tags and additional requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets, effectively handling noisy data, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It is optimized for use with high memory and performs well with GPU, matching the dataset's computational requirements. Moreover, it offers scalability for large datasets and is known for short training times, fitting the need for efficient processing on this type of data.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It handles tabular data effectively, supports high dimensionality, and is robust to noisy data. The VAE is scalable to large datasets, aligns with high memory requirements, and can be trained in a relatively short time. Although it has weaknesses with CPU optimization, the model's strengths in managing noise and large dataset scalability on a GPU make it the most compatible choice given the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice based on the given dataset properties and model analyses. The dataset consists of large tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy characteristics. VAE is strong in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data. Additionally, it supports large datasets, is efficient with high memory, and has a short training time, which aligns well with the dataset's requirement of high memory and CPU. While it has weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these do not conflict significantly with the provided dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is the most suitable model for this dataset as it supports tabular data, handles high-dimensional and noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets. It also takes advantage of GPU and high memory capabilities, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it has a weakness related to CPU and long training time, these are mitigated by the strengths that align well with the dataset characteristics, making it the best choice from the provided list.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets with noisy data, leveraging its strengths in efficiently handling high dimensionality and noise. It is scalable to large datasets and operates effectively in a high-memory environment, matching the dataset's requirements. Additionally, the AutoEncoder has a short training time, making it a suitable choice given CPU constraints, despite its potential weakness in handling imbalanced data.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for the dataset given its strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, which are both key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is effective with noisy data, a significant trait of the dataset, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's large size. It utilizes GPU and high memory, which matches the system requirements. Although it has a weakness with CPU, the strength in other areas makes it more suitable than other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is best suited for the given dataset properties as it handles tabular data effectively, supports high dimensionality, and manages noisy data well. It's scalable to large datasets, which matches the requirements of a large data size. The model operates efficiently with high memory and a GPU, aligning with the dataset's computational requirements. Although it has weaknesses, they do not directly impact this use case. Thus, AutoEncoder is a suitable choice given the dataset's characteristics and additional computational requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice given the dataset's characteristics of large size, tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data. It handles high memory requirements well and is scalable to large datasets while offering short training times. Although it requires GPU, which aligns with the additional requirements, AutoEncoder also excels in dealing with high-dimensional and noisy data, making it a strong candidate for the provided dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice as it is designed for tabular data and can handle high-dimensional and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It also supports large datasets efficiently due to its scalability and high memory capability, which is compatible with the CPU requirement. Moreover, its short training time helps in faster model deployment.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is effective with tabular data, handles high dimensionality well, and performs adequately with noisy data, all of which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it prefers GPU, the requirement of using CPU is mitigated by high memory capability. Thus, AutoEncoder offers a balanced strength for this dataset, making it the best choice from the list.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is a suitable choice for this dataset as it is strong in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the current dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and performs well with high memory resources. While it needs a GPU, the focus on CPU is not critical given the model's other strengths. Its short training time is also advantageous, making it a balanced choice for the given requirements.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: arrhythmia\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"high dimensionality\", \"noisy data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\", \"high memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data characteristics. It handles high memory requirements effectively and supports both GPU usage and short training time, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirements. Unlike other models, VAE has specific strengths in handling tabular data which matches exactly with the dataset type, and overcomes its own weakness concerning CPU dependency by leveraging GPU capability, making it a more adaptable choice for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is characterized by high dimensionality, noisy data, and tabular data, which ALAD is specifically strong in handling. Additionally, ALAD is scalable to large datasets and requires high memory, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirement of high memory usage. Despite having a long training time as a weakness, ALAD's strengths closely match the essential characteristics of the dataset, making it the most suitable choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is well-suited for the dataset properties: it supports tabular data and is robust to high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches the dataset tags. It can handle large datasets, which is suitable for a medium-sized dataset, and it requires high memory, aligning well with the dataset's additional CPU and memory requirements. Although it requires a GPU for optimal performance, it is fully capable of scaling to larger datasets, making it ideal given the dataset characteristics and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is best suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, matching the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, its compatibility with high memory use and short training time address the computational requirements specified. Although VAE does require careful tuning of hyperparameters, its advantages in the given context outweigh this weakness.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is particularly well-suited to the dataset attributes because it handles tabular data and high-dimensionality effectively, and is capable of managing noisy data. It also supports high memory environments which aligns with the additional requirement mentioned. Despite being more effective with GPU, VAE's strengths with tabular and high-dimensional data, along with short training times and scalability to large datasets, make it the most suitable option given the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is most suitable for the given dataset as it matches well with the dataset's properties such as being medium-sized, high dimensionality, and containing noisy data. VAE supports tabular data and efficiently handles high dimensional and noisy datasets, operating well with high memory on CPU infrastructure. It offers a short training time, making it viable for medium-sized datasets. Though it has weaknesses with discrete and categorical data and is ideally suited for GPU, its alignment with the key characteristics and support for tabular data make it the most suitable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is highly suitable for the given dataset characteristics. It is strong with tabular data, handles high dimensionality, and performs well with noisy data, which are critical features of the dataset. Additionally, VAE operates efficiently with high memory and has a short training time, aligning with the computational resource constraints of CPU and high memory requirements. Its ability to work well with large datasets makes it an excellent fit for the medium-sized dataset we have.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for the dataset as it effectively handles tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data. It can run efficiently on systems with high memory and leverage GPUs for faster processing. Although it may struggle with categorical or sparse data, these are not the focus of the dataset's characteristics, making VAE the best choice given the options available.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, as mentioned in the dataset tags. It performs well with tabular data and can handle high dimensionality and noise efficiently. Moreover, VAE supports high memory environments, which aligns with the additional requirements. Despite its weakness in dealing with CPU environments, it fits the majority of the dataset characteristics and requirements, making it the most suitable choice among the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a suitable choice because it supports tabular data and is adept at handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It also accommodates medium data sizes and operates efficiently with high memory on a CPU. Its strengths overlap heavily with the dataset characteristics, making it the best match compared to other options which either do not adequately support tabular data or have a weakness with noisy data.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it is capable of handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, VAE is efficient on a medium data size, supports high memory environments, and benefits from GPU acceleration for optimal performance. While it does not perform well with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these weaknesses are not primary concerns given the dataset tags provided. It also avoids the high computational cost associated with the CPU, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirements for a CPU and high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice for this dataset given its strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data. Additionally, it is well-suited for datasets that require high memory usage and can efficiently utilize GPU resources with a short training time, meeting the 'high memory' and 'CPU' additional requirements. Although its weakness includes CPU usage, the strengths, particularly for handling tabular and high-dimensional noisy data, align closely with the dataset's properties, making it the most appropriate choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It also supports high memory, a requirement due to the dataset's size and complexity. Despite using CPU and high memory, its strength in handling high dimensionality and noise, combined with its scalability to large datasets, makes ALAD the best choice among the models listed.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is described as medium-sized tabular data with high dimensionality and noise. The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data and has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data. Moreover, it operates effectively with GPU and high memory, which aligns with the additional requirements. Its short training time and scalability to large datasets make it a practical choice for efficient training processes.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, VAE supports high memory usage and is efficient on large datasets, making it compatible with the 'medium' dataset size and computational requirements. Despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data and CPU preference, these are outweighed by its strengths in high dimensionality and noisy data, which are more critical for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable choice as it excels in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It also supports high memory usage and has a short training time, which fits the additional requirements. While it has a weakness with CPU usage, its strengths significantly match the dataset tags better than other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is best suited for this dataset as it excels at handling high dimensionality and noisy tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Furthermore, it operates well on larger datasets with a requirement for high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it is not specifically optimized for CPU, VAE's strengths in handling tabular, high-dimensional, and noisy data outweigh its limitations, making it the most suitable choice among the models provided.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is suitable for high dimensional, noisy, tabular data, making it a good fit for the dataset properties provided. While it requires high memory, it can handle high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, which are crucial characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, ensuring that the medium size of the data is manageable. The weaknesses of ALAD related to time series, audio, and video are not relevant to the dataset, and it does not rely on a CPU, aligning with the additional requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is the most suitable choice based on the given dataset properties. It is effective with tabular data and can handle high dimensionality and noisy data well, matching the main characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, its strengths include compatibility with GPU and high memory, which align with the additional requirements specified for the dataset. The VAE also supports a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it robust for a medium-sized dataset. Its primary weakness of poor handling of discrete or categorical data is not a highlighted concern in the provided dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular with high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches the strengths of the AutoEncoder model. AutoEncoder is suitable for high-dimensional tabular data, handles noisy data well, has high memory capacity, and can scale to large datasets. Although training requires GPU, it matches the high memory requirement suitable for the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset as it handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is well-suited for tabular data, supports high memory, and offers scalability to large datasets, meeting the requirement for CPU-based implementations with high memory demands. Although it requires GPUs for optimal performance, it offers a balance of strengths that align well with the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is highly suitable for this dataset as it is strong in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, all of which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, VAE performs well with medium-sized datasets and supports high memory systems, aligning well with the provided dataset requirements. Despite its weakness with imbalanced and real-time data, these are not priorities according to the dataset tags, making VAE the most suitable model considering the strengths and weaknesses outlined.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, consisting of tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data. AutoEncoder is recognized for its capability to handle high-dimensional and noisy data, especially in tabular form, which matches well with the dataset tags. It also supports high memory requirements and short training times, suitable for the computational preferences of using CPU and requiring high memory. While it has weaknesses with small data sizes, which is not a concern here, it aligns well with other dataset needs such as high dimensional and noisy data processing.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for this dataset because it handles tabular data effectively and excels with high dimensionality and noisy data. Additionally, it supports high memory requirements and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset's need for high memory operations. VAE operates efficiently with a short training time, making it practical for medium-sized datasets. Although it has a weakness with CPU usage, the VAE's strengths align closely with the dataset characteristics, particularly in terms of handling high dimensionality and noise.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is best suited for the given dataset as it handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It also supports tabular data, aligns with the high memory requirement, and can manage medium-sized datasets efficiently. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, these are not primary characteristics of the dataset, making VAE the most appropriate choice.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for this case due to its strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It also has the necessary support for high memory as listed in the dataset requirements. Despite its weaknesses related to CPU usage and discrete data, the strengths align well with the current dataset needs, particularly given its capability for short training time and scalability with large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model is particularly well-suited for this dataset due to its ability to handle tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it supports high memory usage, which aligns with the additional requirements given. Despite its noted weakness in CPU utilization, VAE's support for GPU makes it feasible for execution in environments with available GPU resources, alongside short training time that can enhance efficiency given the medium-sized dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, high-dimensional, and noisy, which aligns well with the strengths of the VAE model. VAE is known for handling high dimensionality and noisy data effectively. Unlike some other models, VAE supports tabular data and can operate well with a high memory requirement. It also has a short training time suitable for medium-sized datasets. While it lists CPU as a weakness, the overall match of other strengths makes it a suitable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It supports tabular data and handles high dimensional and noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics such as high dimensionality and noisy data. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and can utilize high memory, matching the additional requirement of high memory. Importantly, AutoEncoder accommodates GPU usage, which can be beneficial if GPU resources are available, ensuring short training times even on medium-sized datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it handles tabular data effectively and excels with high-dimensional and noisy data, which matches the characteristics of the dataset. It also accommodates high memory requirements and provides short training times, aligning well with the additional requirements specified. Despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data and limited support for CPU-based processing, the strengths align well with the dataset's features and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset involves tabular data with medium size, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which fits well with the strengths of the AutoEncoder. It is adept at handling high dimensionality and noisy data in tabular form. The model supports high memory usage and short training time, making it suitable given the CPU and high memory requirements, despite the CPU preference as a minor weakness. Additionally, the AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets, which provides flexibility for future scaling needs.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset because it handles tabular data effectively and is particularly strong in dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is designed for high-memory scenarios and can perform well without a GPU, aligning with the CPU requirement of the dataset. Although VAE has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, the absence of such a tag suggests this might not be a constraint for the given dataset. Its capability for short training time on large datasets further supports its fit for a medium-sized dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data characteristics, which require high memory. AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively. It also utilizes high memory efficiently. While it has a weakness with CPU-bound tasks, the additional requirement of CPU in this scenario makes it a minor concern compared to its strengths. With a short training time and scalability to large datasets, AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and additional requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is the most suitable choice because it handles tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also supports high memory requirements and scalability to large datasets, fitting well with additional requirements. Despite its long training time, its strengths match the dataset characteristics better than other models.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is chosen because it handles tabular data effectively, supports high dimensionality, and performs well with noisy data, which aligns well with the given dataset characteristics. Despite requiring high memory and potentially less CPU efficiency, it provides short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it suitable given the medium data size. The main weaknesses, such as handling discrete or categorical data and CPU inefficiency, are less critical compared to the alignment with other needs.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it handles tabular data and high-dimensional, noisy data effectively, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics. It requires high memory and operates efficiently on a medium-sized dataset. Although it does not prioritize CPU usage, its strengths in managing high dimensionality and noisy data make it the best fit among the models listed.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is suitable for the given dataset as it handles 'tabular data' effectively, supports 'high dimensionality' and 'noisy data' which are characteristics of the dataset. Furthermore, it aligns well with the requirement of high memory and is efficient for datasets of medium size. The strengths of VAE overlap with all key dataset characteristics, fulfilling the need for scalable and supportive processing with a short training time on large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular and characterized by high dimensionality and noisy data with a requirement for CPU and high memory. VAE is strong in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data. It operates well on GPU with high memory - aligning with the dataset’s high memory requirement. While VAE is not specifically optimized for CPU, its strengths align closely with the dataset’s characteristics, particularly in handling tabular data and high dimensionality.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the best choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which align with the dataset properties. It also supports high memory requirements and has a short training time, making it suitable for medium-sized datasets with high-dimensional, noisy data. Additionally, while competing models like AutoEncoder and ALAD also handle tabular data and high dimensionality, VAE distinctly offers short training times and efficiency on large datasets. Its CPU limitation is mitigated by the focus on high memory setups, as noted in the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset properties include medium data size, tabular data type, high dimensionality, and noisy data, requiring a CPU with access to high memory. AutoEncoder is a strong match for these requirements as it excels with tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data while being scalable to large datasets. Additionally, it supports GPU utilization, high memory, and short training times, aligning well with the dataset characteristics. Although high dimensionality and noisy data are its strengths, the model's capability in handling tabular data, scalability, and computational efficiency make it the most suitable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it is particularly strong with tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which align with the dataset's characteristics. It also supports high memory requirements and short training times, addressing the additional requirements for CPU and high memory. While it generally prefers GPU over CPU, in this context, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data in tabular formats make it a strong candidate despite its noted weakness with discrete or categorical data. Furthermore, VAE is scalable to large datasets, making it fit for the medium-sized dataset specified.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is best suited for this dataset, which is medium in size and consists of tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy characteristics. The model's strengths align well with these dataset properties, as it supports tabular and high-dimensional data, effectively manages noisy data, and scales well to large datasets. Although it requires high memory, which matches the dataset's additional requirements, it also provides short training times, making it a practical choice despite using a CPU instead of a GPU.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it handles tabular data and is known for managing high dimensionality and noisy data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Moreover, it requires high memory but performs efficiently with short training times and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the requirement of CPU and high memory usage. The model's weaknesses in handling audio, video, or real-time data are not relevant here since these aspects do not match the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset as it handles tabular data effectively and is robust to high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics in the dataset. Additionally, it benefits from high memory resources and provides short training times, aligning well with the 'Additional requirements'. Despite CPU preference being noted, AutoEncoder's strengths in handling the other dataset characteristics and its scalability to large datasets make it the most suitable model for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for the given dataset because it effectively handles tabular and high dimensional data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is also capable of dealing with noisy data, making it a good fit for this scenario. Although it typically requires a GPU, which is not ideal since the dataset specifies CPU, the model's other strengths outweigh this requirement. Its ability to handle large datasets and short training time enhance its compatibility with the 'medium' data size specified.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for the given dataset as it handles tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data effectively. It supports high memory usage and has a short training time, which matches well with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it has a weakness in handling discrete or categorical data, this was not specified as a dataset tag, making VAE the most aligned choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. It has strengths in handling large datasets with high memory requirements and performs efficiently with GPU, aligning with additional dataset requirements. Despite its weakness in requiring a GPU for optimal performance, this model provides the best overall fit given the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and can handle datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It also benefits from GPU acceleration and high memory, both of which align with the additional requirements. Despite the presence of other strengths such as high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets, AutoEncoder has a short training time, making it efficient for medium-sized datasets like this one.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model as it is strong in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which align with the characteristics of the dataset. It requires high memory and is scalable to large datasets, fitting well with the dataset's additional requirements. Although VAE has a weakness in handling CPU resources, the strengths in other areas such as short training time and adaptability to large datasets make it the best fit given the dataset's properties.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is most suitable as it handles high-dimensional and noisy tabular data effectively, supports high memory, and benefits from GPU acceleration. It is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it efficient for the given medium-sized dataset with high memory requirement.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: pendigits\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"low-signal data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and offers short training time, which is beneficial for minimizing memory usage. While it has weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data, these are less relevant given its strengths align closely with the dataset requirements and model needs. Additionally, VAE's ability to manage high-dimensional and noisy data could be advantageous for a low-signal data scenario, despite its lack of specialization in high memory usage which can be mitigated by careful resource allocation.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is best suited for this dataset because it supports tabular data and has low memory requirements, which aligns with the 'low memory' requirement of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR is designed for low-dimensional datasets, which can be relevant for low-signal data. While it is sensitive to hyperparameters, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which makes it a suitable choice given the dataset's medium size and characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data and medium-sized datasets, which matches the given dataset properties. Additionally, it has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, allowing it to potentially perform well on low-signal data. Although it requires higher memory, it is still a better fit compared to other models which have more critical weaknesses regarding low-signal data and/or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable for the dataset's characteristics which include tabular data and low memory requirements. Despite the data being labeled as 'low-signal', the AutoEncoder's ability to handle tabular data and its strengths in working with medium-sized datasets aligns well with the given dataset properties. Additionally, the AutoEncoder has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it ideal for medium data sizes with low memory constraints, outweighing its weakness with low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable because it handles tabular data effectively, aligns well with medium-sized datasets, and can accommodate low memory requirements due to its short training time and efficient scalability. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced data, this aligns with the dataset's tag of 'low-signal data' rather than an imbalance issue, making it the most fitting choice among the provided options.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it is strong in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. It also has short training time, which is suitable given the low memory constraint of the dataset. Although it requires high memory generally, its strengths in managing tabular data, high dimensionality, and handling noisy data make it the most aligned choice. The weaknesses do not significantly impact this choice since the dataset does not focus on real-time data or categorical imbalanced data, which are key limitations of VAE.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model as it is effective with tabular data, which is a key property of the dataset. It supports medium data size and operates efficiently with GPU, aligning with the dataset's low memory requirement. Despite its weaknesses with imbalanced and sparse data, VAE's strengths around high dimensionality and quick training time make it the best fit among the available options for low-signal data scenarios.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized with tabular data, low-signal characteristics, and requires low memory usage. VAE specifically supports tabular data, has short training times, and can handle some amount of noisy and high-dimensional data, which makes it suitable for datasets that may require some transformation for effective pattern recognition. While VAE typically utilizes high memory, its support for tabular data and short training time outweigh this weakness compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is suitable for tabular data and is known to handle medium-sized datasets well, matching the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it operates efficiently with low memory, a crucial requirement given the dataset constraints. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, it aligns well with the need for managing low-signal data and short training times. Its strengths in handling high dimensionality and scaling to large datasets further validate its selection for the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is suitable for tabular data and datasets with low dimensionality, which aligns with the characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it operates efficiently with a medium data size, ensures low memory usage, and provides short training time, meeting the low-memory constraint. While it may have hyperparameter sensitivity, and require computational resources, these weaknesses do not outweigh its strengths in this context compared to other models like VAE or AutoEncoder that handle tabular data but require high memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable because it supports tabular data and is capable of handling medium-sized datasets with the given low-signal data characteristic. It has a short training time and can manage noisy data, which aligns with the dataset tags. Although it has a weakness with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these are not highlighted as concerns in the dataset tags provided. Importantly, it is less constrained by the low memory requirement compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Even though the dataset has low signal, VAE does not have specific weaknesses against low-signal data. It also supports medium data size effectively and has strengths in handling noisy data, which may align with low-signal characteristics. Additionally, VAE has short training times and is scalable to large datasets, which suits medium-sized datasets. However, despite requiring high memory, it balances other requirements quite well, and there is no model without a memory constraint that better matches all the dataset needs from the given list.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics and low memory requirements. VAE is suitable as it supports tabular data, is compatible with medium-sized datasets, and has a short training time, which aligns well with the memory requirement. Despite the high memory note in strengths, the VAE's capability to handle tabular data efficiently makes it a better fit given the dataset constraints compared to other models that either struggle with low-signal data or tabular format.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics and a requirement for low memory usage. Among the model list, VAE has strengths in handling tabular data, medium-sized datasets, and short training time, which matches the dataset properties well. Although VAE typically requires high memory, its other strengths outweigh this weakness compared to alternatives. Models like AnoGAN, ALAD, and AE1SVM have weaknesses specifically in tabular data or low memory operations, making them less suitable. Thus, VAE offers the best balance for these requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It can handle medium-sized datasets well and provides a short training time, ensuring efficient resource usage within low memory constraints. Although it shows weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these are not primary concerns given these properties are not specified for the dataset. VAE also effectively processes low-signal tabular data and doesn't suffer the low-memory issue seen in other models, making it a good fit for the dataset needs.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is preferred because it handles tabular data and medium-sized datasets well, which matches the dataset property's emphasis on tabular data. Although it demands high memory, which is a downside given the low memory requirement, its short training time and ability to handle noisy data justify the compromise, particularly as other models have more significant weaknesses concerning tabular or low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also suitable for medium-sized datasets and offers short training times, which aligns with the additional requirement of low memory usage. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced data and low-signal data, these are less critical than the high memory requirement weaknesses found in other models suitable for tabular data. Other potential models like ALAD and AutoEncoder have weaknesses with low-signal data, and smaller data sizes, respectively, making VAE the better choice given the provided constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is strong with tabular data, which is the data type present in the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR is effective with low-dimensional datasets and sparse or imbalanced data, which can sometimes arise in scenarios with low-signal data. It also provides scalability to large datasets while being efficient with GPU and having short training time. LUNAR does not have any specific weaknesses associated with low memory setting, which is a requirement for this dataset. Its alignment with several dataset characteristics makes it a preferable choice over other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Based on the dataset properties, the VAE model is the most suitable choice as it specifically supports tabular data, which matches the data type. Additionally, it provides a short training time which aligns well with the medium data size and low memory requirement of the dataset. Although VAEs generally require high memory, their compatibility with tabular data and efficient training time make them a good fit for low-signal data, particularly when other models have weaknesses regarding tabular data or low memory consumption.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is most suitable for the given dataset properties. It supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Despite having a medium data size tag, its capability to handle large datasets makes it adaptable to various data sizes. It is well-suited for low-memory environments and offers short training times. While AE1SVM has a weakness with small data sizes, the dataset is tagged as medium, which should not be an issue. Additionally, its strength in handling sparse data and imbalanced data may also provide an advantage for low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the best choice because it is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the data type in the dataset tags. It handles high dimensionality well and has a short training time, which mitigates concerns related to low memory. Although it has a weakness with low-signal data, it offers significant strengths with tabular data and large datasets while benefiting from GPU acceleration, making it the most suitable model for the given dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice for medium-sized tabular data with low memory requirements. It is specifically designed for tabular data and compatible with datasets that are not too small, while efficiently handling low-signal data due to its robustness to high dimensionality and noisy data. Although VAE may require high memory, among the other options within inconsistencies for the dataset characteristics, VAE offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it appropriate for the given dataset constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is chosen because it is effective on tabular data, which matches the dataset type. While the data is characterized as low-signal, VAE is generally versatile and can deal with high-dimensional data, which could be helpful in extracting meaningful patterns from low-signal data. It also fits the medium data size category due to its capability to handle large datasets efficiently. The model's short training time aligns well with the additional requirement of low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It can manage medium-sized datasets effectively and has a short training time, aligning well with the low-memory requirement. Although it may not be ideal for low-signal data, other models in the list have greater weaknesses related to low memory or tabular data. VAE's relative strengths in these areas make it the best fit from the given options.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset involves medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics and requires low memory usage. Among the models, the AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data, can handle high dimensionality, and offers short training time, which is efficient for medium-sized datasets. Although it has a weakness with low-signal data, the AutoEncoder aligns better with the available models given its capability to process tabular data and manage relatively lower memory consumption compared to other models that either require high memory or are less suitable for tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Given the dataset properties, a medium-sized tabular dataset with low-signal data and low memory requirements, VAE is the most suitable model. It supports tabular data and has strengths in handling noisy data, which aligns well with the low-signal characteristic. Additionally, it has a short training time and can scale to large datasets. While it has a high memory requirement, all other models have critical weaknesses that render them less suitable, such as incompatibility with tabular data or poor performance on low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset consists of medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics and requires low memory usage. VAE's strengths lie in images and tabular data, with high dimensionality handling, short training time, and scalability to large datasets. While VAE does require high memory, it does not have specific weaknesses against low-signal data and it performs well in handling tabular data, making it a suitable choice compared to other models that show significant weaknesses in one or more of the required aspects.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Given the dataset characteristics of medium-sized, tabular, low-signal data with low memory requirements, LUNAR is the most suitable model. It handles tabular data effectively and excels in short training time, which is critical given the low memory requirement. It is also scalable to large datasets, which provides flexibility. Although it could be computationally intensive, its ability to manage sparse and imbalanced data provides an advantage needed for handling low-signal datasets effectively, making it a suitable choice among the options available.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model among the options due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. It also supports low memory requirements with short training time, which aligns with the additional needs. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data, it is preferable due to its ability to work with low-dimensional datasets and scalability, which can be beneficial for medium-sized datasets with low-signal characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice for the given dataset properties. It is well-suited for tabular data and handles low-signal datasets effectively with short training times and low memory usage, which matches the medium data size and the requirement for low memory usage. While it is not optimal for noisy data, this is not tagged in the dataset, making LUNAR a sensible option given the other model weaknesses in relation to low-signal data and tabular data handling.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and provides a short training time, which is beneficial for medium-sized datasets. Although it requires high memory, its ability to handle high-dimensional and noisy data aligns with the dataset's low-signal characteristic. Despite its high memory usage, VAE's other strengths outweigh this, making it the best fit compared to others that have more critical weaknesses concerning tabular data and low-signal handling.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized, tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It handles high dimensionality and tabular data well and has a short training time, which is beneficial for low memory constraints. While it has weaknesses with imbalanced data and real-time processing, the dataset does not specify these as issues. VAE is also more likely to handle low-signal data than models like AE1SVM or AutoEncoder, which specifically list small data size and low-signal data as weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Additionally, it has a short training time which aligns with the low memory requirement. While it does require high memory, its strengths in handling tabular data and ability to efficiently work without real-time and imbalanced data issues make it a better fit than the other models given the low-signal characteristic of this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It operates efficiently with low-dimensional datasets and is scalable to large datasets, which suits the medium-sized data requirement. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time, aligning with the low memory requirement. Despite its computational intensity, it avoids the major weaknesses impacting other models for low-signal data and tabular data in this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and can handle low-dimensional datasets effectively, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also offers low memory usage and short training time, making it a good choice for medium-sized datasets with low-signal characteristics. Although it has weaknesses in noisy data and computational intensity, these are less of a concern compared to the other models' more significant weaknesses related to low-signal data or low memory settings.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is tabular with medium size, low-signal data, and has a low memory requirement. VAE is strong with tabular data and scalable to large datasets, which suits the medium data size. It also has a short training time, which may not burden memory resources. While VAE is generally high memory, its strengths with tabular data and capability for handling high dimensionality make it the most suitable option given the constraints, as other models either have weaknesses matching the dataset characteristics (e.g., low memory) or are not suitable for tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data, aligns with the dataset type, and has the ability to handle noisy data, which is important given the low-signal data characteristic. While it demands high memory, its strength in dealing with medium data size and short training time makes it a better choice compared to others. Other models like AutoEncoder and ALAD might also seem favorable, but VAE's specific strength in handling low-signal data in conjunction with tabular datasets makes it more suitable in this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is most suitable because it handles tabular data well, which matches the data type of the dataset. It also has a capability to manage medium-sized datasets due to its scalability to large datasets, even though the model is mentioned to use high memory resources. While it may not be the most optimal for low-signal data, its short training time and strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data make it the most fitting option among those listed. Other models either have significant weaknesses in tabular data (e.g., AnoGAN, DevNet), suffer from low memory which is a concern in this case (e.g., MO-GAAL, AE1SVM), or are less suitable for low-signal data contexts (e.g., ALAD, AutoEncoder).\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular data due to its strengths in handling tabular datasets and its capability of operating effectively with low-signal data. Although it typically requires high memory, which is not ideal for low memory requirements, it has short training time and leverages GPU for computation, making it efficient regarding memory usage during training. Other models either lack support for tabular data (like AnoGAN, DevNet) or are not suitable for low-signal data (like ALAD and AutoEncoder).\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets, which matches the dataset tags. It can handle high dimensional data. Although it has some weaknesses with low-signal data, it offers a short training time and scalability, which are beneficial for a dataset with a low memory requirement. Its ability to handle noisy data and use GPUs also aligns well with the characteristics of the dataset. Despite some weaknesses, it is the best fit among the options provided when considering all dataset properties and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is described as medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics and a requirement for low memory. LUNAR is suited for tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset size. It is capable of handling low-dimensional datasets and sparse data, addressing potential issues related to low-signal data. Furthermore, LUNAR has a short training time, beneficial for optimizing resources, even though it is not specifically tailored for low memory, it provides a balance between the other considerations needed for this task. Other models either have weaknesses in handling low-signal data or tabular data, or require high memory, making LUNAR the most fitting choice overall.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data and performs well with medium-sized datasets. Despite its higher memory requirements, it has a short training time and is capable of handling noisy data, aligning with the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset. While it may require tuning for discrete data, it addresses the core requirements of the dataset better than other models available in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is described as medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics, and the need for a model with low memory usage. VAE is suited for tabular data, has short training time, and can handle large datasets. Despite its high memory strength, of the given options, VAE is one of the few models that fit well with tabular data and are scalable, making it a suitable choice given the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strength in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. VAE also has the advantage of a short training time and is capable of working with medium-sized datasets. Despite its high memory requirement, the model's other strengths outweigh those of the other models for this specific dataset configuration. The low-signal data characteristic of the dataset may also be better accommodated by VAE compared to models like AutoEncoder and ALAD, which list low-signal data as a weakness.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It supports tabular data and is designed for low-dimensional datasets, making it a good fit for low-signal data attributes. LUNAR has short training time and is scalable to large datasets, aligning with the medium data size requirement. It also operates efficiently with GPU, which may mitigate some of the low memory concerns. Despite its weaknesses like sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning and being computationally intensive, these do not critically impact the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it is strong in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also accommodates low-dimensional and sparse datasets and can operate with a low memory footprint, meeting the dataset's low memory constraint. Moreover, LUNAR has a short training time and can scale to medium-sized datasets, aligning well with the dataset's tags. Although it is noted for potential computational intensity and hyperparameter sensitivity, these weaknesses are not directly conflicting with the dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is a suitable choice for this dataset as it handles tabular data efficiently, which aligns with the dataset's data type. Additionally, it supports low-dimensional datasets, matches well with the dataset's low-signal characteristic, and is suitable for datasets that need a scalable model. Despite having a medium data size, LUNAR's ability to efficiently process sparse and imbalanced data, alongside its short training time, makes it compatible with low-memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which is the type of data presented. It is also capable of dealing with noisy data, which is characteristic of low-signal datasets. Although VAE requires high memory, it offers a short training time, which is beneficial for a medium-sized dataset. Other models either have weaknesses related to low-signal data or tabular data, or require a level of memory not suitable given the dataset's additional requirements for low memory.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it supports tabular data, which matches one of the key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, VAE is capable of handling low-signal data, although it's not specifically highlighted as one of its strengths, it performs adequately with high dimensionality, which might help capture subtle patterns in low-signal data. Moreover, it has a short training time and is applicable to datasets of medium size, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of requiring low memory consumption due to limited memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular data and low-memory environments, both of which are key characteristics of this dataset. It also has strengths in handling imbalanced and sparse data while maintaining a short training time, which is beneficial given the medium data size. Although it has weaknesses like high memory usage, it is still the best fit given the need for low memory and the dataset's low-signal nature, compared to others that have significant weaknesses for such data types.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: shuttle\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"large\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"noisy data\", \"low-signal data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it is strong in handling tabular and noisy data, which fits the dataset characteristics well. It is scalable to large datasets and can also run on low memory constraints, although it typically requires high memory. Despite some weaknesses, such as sensitivity to poorly tuned hyperparameters and not being optimal for imbalanced or sparse data, its strengths align more closely with the requirements than the other models. The dataset's large size and noise can be effectively managed by the VAE's capabilities.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it is suitable for large tabular datasets and handles noisy data well, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Although it has a high memory requirement, this constraint is outweighed by its scalability to large datasets. VAE also offers short training times, which is advantageous given the additional low memory requirement, making it a balanced choice among available models.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it handles tabular data and large datasets effectively, which are properties of the given dataset. Additionally, VAE is strong in dealing with noisy data, a characteristic of the dataset. While VAE has a weakness with low memory requirements, it aligns well with other strengths needed for this use case, such as short training time and scalability to large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is well-suited for large, tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. VAE is adept at handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which is a crucial requirement given the dataset characteristics. Even though it does require high memory, the model compensates with a short training time, and the ability to scale to large datasets. The other models either cannot handle tabular data or noisy data as effectively or they have constraints with the memory usage. Thus, VAE is the most suitable model, balancing the strengths and the requirements of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice as it supports tabular data and is effective with noisy data, both of which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which are aligned with the dataset's large size requirement. Although VAE has high memory requirements, which contradicts the low memory constraint, its support for tabular and noisy data along with scalability makes it a better fit compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data with noisy characteristics and can handle large datasets effectively. While it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, the dataset does not mention such features as a primary concern. The VAE model is also efficient with GPU, which can aid in handling the computational load given the low memory constraint. Additionally, VAE does well with short training times on large datasets, fitting the requirement for low memory usage and scalability.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, large datasets, and noisy data. It also offers scalability to large datasets which matches the 'large' data size requirement. Although it requires high memory, which could be a constraint, its ability to handle noisy and tabular data makes it preferable over other models that have identified weaknesses with such characteristics. The trade-off in terms of memory is offset by its effective handling of other key dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and model analyses. The dataset is large-sized and consists of tabular data, with characteristics of noisy and low-signal data, which VAE handles well. VAE's strengths include working well with tabular and noisy data, and it is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Although VAE requires high memory, it fits the large tabular data with noisy conditions better than other models listed, which have more prominent weaknesses in such environments, such as low-signal data handling or memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it is strong in handling tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. Additionally, it excels in processing noisy data and can handle large datasets efficiently, matching the dataset's characteristics. Although it is high memory, the absence of low memory requirement as a strength among the other models with suitable characteristics leaves VAE as a balanced trade-off considering the dataset's large size and low-signal characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the best choice because it supports tabular data, is robust to noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset tags. Although it requires high memory, its ability to handle large datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data makes it suitable for this scenario. The low-signal data in the dataset is not a weakness for VAE, unlike other models such as DevNet, ALAD, or AutoEncoder that struggle more with low-signal data or have other incompatibilities such as poor performance on noisy data or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset criteria as it is strong in handling tabular data, noisy data, and large datasets, all of which align well with the dataset properties. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory requirement. Although VAE has weaknesses in handling imbalanced and sparse data, these aspects are not highlighted as significant challenges for the provided dataset. Among the options, VAE best matches the dataset characteristics while addressing the memory constraint effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is best suited for the dataset's characteristics, including large and tabular data, along with its ability to handle noisy data efficiently. It scales well to large datasets and has short training times, which is an advantage for a large dataset. Although it has high memory usage, its efficiency in handling high-dimensional and noisy data makes it the most suitable choice given the dataset requirements and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it directly addresses the requirements of dealing with large tabular datasets, handling noise efficiently, and compatibility with high dimensionality. It is scalable to large datasets, supports noisy data, and works well with tabular data, aligning well with the dataset properties. Although it requires high memory, this is a trade-off for its benefits in handling the noise, which is a critical factor in this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this scenario as it supports tabular data, performs well with noisy and high-dimensional data, is scalable to large datasets, and has a short training time. Although it requires high memory, it meets most of the dataset requirements, particularly handling large, noisy data effectively and utilizing GPU acceleration, which aligns well with the additional requirement for low memory usage. Other models either do not support tabular data sufficiently or have issues with scalability, training time, or memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for this dataset because it supports large tabular datasets effectively. It is also capable of handling noisy data, which is a key characteristic of the given dataset. Furthermore, VAE can utilize GPU resources, necessary for handling large datasets with high dimensionality efficiently, which aligns with the 'low memory' requirement by ensuring quick processing and a short training time. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, the dataset's characteristics do not emphasize these as primary concerns, making VAE the optimal choice considering both strengths and weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for 'tabular data' and 'noisy data,' aligning well with the dataset characteristics provided. It is capable of handling 'large datasets' and offers 'short training time' advantages, which are beneficial given the large data size requirement. Although VAE requires high memory, which contradicts the low memory requirement, this is a trade-off given the focus on handling 'noisy data' and scalability, which are more critical for this dataset. Other models either have significant weaknesses with tabular data or noisy data, or lack efficiency with large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties as it successfully handles large tabular datasets, noisy and high-dimensional data, which are the characteristics of the given dataset. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which aligns well with the requirement of low memory usage. Despite being slightly weaker in capturing low-signal data, its overall strengths match the dataset needs better than the other models available.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is most suitable for this dataset because it can handle large tabular data with characteristics such as noisy data and low-signal data. VAE supports GPU acceleration, which is beneficial given the large data size. Although it requires high memory, it is capable of processing large datasets efficiently and has a short training time, which aligns with the requirement for low memory usage. Despite its weaknesses in dealing with discrete or categorical data, these are not pertinent issues for this specific dataset, focusing mainly on tabular and noisy data characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset as it supports tabular data and performs well with noisy data, which are key characteristics of this dataset. It is scalable to large datasets, has a short training time, and can leverage GPUs. Although it requires high memory, which might not align perfectly with the low memory constraint, its overall strengths in handling large, noisy datasets and specific support for tabular data make it the best choice among the listed models.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the best choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and large datasets. It is well-suited for noisy data, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Despite its high memory usage, it offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's large size and low memory requirement. VAE's design accommodates the low-signal data property of the dataset better than other models like AE1SVM, which lists noisy data as a weakness, or ALAD, which has low-signal data as a weakness.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset comprises large, tabular, noisy, and low-signal data, with an additional requirement of low memory. VAE is suitable as it works well with tabular data, supports noisy data, is scalable to large datasets, and provides short training times. While VAE generally needs high memory, it possesses advantages across other characteristics, outperforming other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, and ALAD that do not align well with the tabular format or low memory requirements. This makes VAE the most aligned choice from the given list.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model because it performs well with tabular data, can handle noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset properties. Despite a requirement for low memory, VAE compensates with short training time and effectiveness with high-dimensional and noisy datasets, making it a balanced choice overall considering the dataset's characteristics and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this scenario as it aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It is capable of handling tabular data and works well with large datasets, which matches the dataset under consideration. Additionally, VAE effectively deals with noisy data, which is essential for this low-signal, noisy dataset. Although it is not optimized for low memory environments, its strengths in dealing with large, noisy tabular data make it a more fitting choice than the other options provided, which either lack support for noisy data or have significant weaknesses in handling tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data, which is the type of data in the dataset. It handles noisy data effectively and is scalable to large datasets, aligning with the dataset property of 'large' size. Although it has weaknesses in dealing with low-signal data, its overall strengths, including short training time and GPU support, make it a better fit compared to other models that either do not support tabular data or have issues with scalability, low memory, or noisy data.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model because it handles tabular data and is designed for large datasets, aligning with the dataset properties. It performs well with noisy data and offers a short training time, which is conducive to the low memory requirements. While it has a high memory demand, this can be managed given the model's other advantages over the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for the given dataset characteristics. It is designed to handle 'tabular data', which aligns with the dataset's data type. Additionally, VAE excels with 'noisy data' and is efficient with 'large datasets'. While it requires high memory, it performs well with GPU resources, which is not a specific constraint in the dataset. Although it has some weaknesses, such as handling 'discrete or categorical data' and 'imbalanced data', these are not primary concerns provided in the dataset properties. With its strengths in handling tabular data, noise, and scalability, VAE stands out among the options available.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data and is effective with noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's large size, and it features short training times. While it has high memory requirements, which may be a slight drawback considering the need for low memory, its advantages in handling the dataset's properties outweigh this limitation compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is best suited for this dataset due to its ability to handle tabular and noisy data effectively while being scalable to large datasets. It also benefits from a short training time, which is crucial given the dataset characteristics and the requirement for low memory usage. Despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data, the strengths of handling high dimensionality, use of GPU, and efficient handling of noisy data make VAE the most appropriate model for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it supports large tabular datasets with noisy data, matching the dataset properties. Despite its high memory requirement, it has strengths in handling high dimensionality, making it suitable for the provided dataset's characteristics. It also scales to large datasets and has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory requirement, despite not meeting it entirely. Overall, VAE aligns best with both the dataset needs and model capability, especially considering the noisy data aspect.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for this dataset as it is capable of handling large tabular datasets with high dimensionality. It excels in managing noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics provided. Additionally, VAE can operate efficiently on large datasets and is scalable, fulfilling the requirement for low memory usage during inference. While it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data which is not mentioned in the dataset tags and has an advantage of running on GPU which supports scalability for large data, its strengths in tabular data with noisy characteristics make it the best fit among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, noisy, and low-signal with a low-memory requirement. AutoEncoder is well-suited to handle large datasets with tabular data and is capable of handling noisy data. It has a short training time and can be scaled to large datasets using GPU, which aligns well with the dataset requirements. Despite its weakness in handling low-signal data, it is the best available option given the other constraints. Other models either have significant weaknesses with tabular data, low memory, or noisy data.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. It offers scalability to large datasets, uses GPU, and has short training time. Although it requires high memory, which is a weakness, VAE's strengths align closely with the important dataset characteristics for this scenario, making it the most suitable choice from the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset comprises large tabular data characterized by noise and low signal, with a requirement for low memory usage. Among the given models, the AutoEncoder leverages strengths such as handling tabular data, functioning well with noisy data, and scalability to large datasets. While it typically requires high memory, its adaptability to GPU and scalable nature make it suitable for large datasets despite the low-signal nature. Additionally, it offers short training times, which is advantageous under memory constraints. Despite some weaknesses in handling low-signal data, AutoEncoder is the most balanced choice considering the need for processing large, noisy tabular datasets efficiently.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for a large tabular dataset with noisy, low-signal data and low memory requirements. It is capable of handling tabular data, performs well with noisy data, and can scale to large datasets while offering short training times due to GPU support. Despite requiring high memory, compared to other options which struggle with noisy data or have longer training times, VAE offers a balanced approach fitting the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the best choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, which align with the dataset characteristics. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it suitable for a large dataset. While it has high memory requirements, its other strengths make it more appropriate than other models, which have more limitations regarding noisy and low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and handles noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It can work with high-dimensional data, requires GPU, and is scalable to large datasets. Although it has high memory requirements, it offers a short training time and deals well with large datasets, making it compatible with the low memory requirement of the dataset if appropriately managed. The other models have significant weaknesses either with noisy data, tabular data, or large data scalability.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it is well suited for tabular data and noisy data, both of which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is capable of handling large datasets efficiently and has a short training time, which is advantageous given the dataset's large size. Despite its high memory requirement, the strengths align better with the dataset's properties compared to other models. Models like AnoGAN, DevNet, MO-GAAL, and AE1SVM are ruled out due to their weaknesses with tabular and/or noisy data, or their low memory compatibility.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Given the dataset's characteristics, VAE emerges as the most suitable choice. It handles tabular data well, is scalable to large datasets, and is proficient at managing noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of being large, noisy, and low-signal. Additionally, VAE supports GPU acceleration and offers short training times, which helps accommodate the requirement for low memory usage. Despite its weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data, the strengths align well with the given requirements and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and is robust to noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It also scales well to large datasets and benefits from short training times, making it suitable for this large dataset with low memory requirement. Although it requires high memory, none of the other models completely meet all the other dataset requirements while also supporting tabular data, low memory usage, and scaling.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is selected as it is suitable for tabular data, supports large datasets, and can handle noisy data, which align with the dataset tags provided. Despite its high memory requirements, VAE offers short training times and is capable of scaling to large datasets. Other models either do not support tabular data efficiently or have weaknesses that heavily misalign with the dataset's characteristics such as low memory requirements or poor performance on noisy data.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the best choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular and noisy data, which align with the dataset characteristics. It is suitable for large datasets and has a short training time, addressing the low-memory requirement. Additionally, AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets, and its strength in managing high dimensionality matches the potential complexity of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model because it handles large tabular datasets efficiently, with strengths in noisy data and GPU scalability, which match the dataset properties. Although it has high memory usage which is a concern, its ability to manage large noisy datasets and compatibility with tabular data make it the best choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it effectively handles tabular and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets and can be trained quickly, making it suitable for the large data size and the requirement for low memory utilization. Although it typically requires high memory, VAE strikes a balance between dataset compatibility and processing efficiency better than other models in this context. Competitors like AnoGAN and AE1SVM have significant weaknesses (incompatibility with tabular data and issues with noisy data, respectively) that make them less suitable.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is selected as it is well-suited for handling large tabular datasets, which matches the dataset's size and type. It is also effective with noisy data, one of the key characteristics of the dataset. Despite its high memory requirements, which conflicts with the low-memory need, no other model satisfies as many requirements, especially the ability to handle noisy data and scalability to large datasets. The other models either have significant weaknesses with tabular data, such as AnoGAN, or struggle with noisy data and scalability, such as ALAD and Deep SVDD.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and can handle noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its requirement for high memory, VAE can efficiently manage large datasets and offers short training times. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced data, the dataset characteristics do not emphasize imbalance. Thus, VAE emerges as the most balanced choice for the given dataset, prioritizing both scalability and dataset alignment.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and constraints. It is well-suited for tabular and noisy data, has a strong capability to handle high dimensionality, is scalable to large datasets, and offers a short training time. Although it requires high memory, which is a drawback, VAE stands out for its strengths in handling core dataset characteristics like large size, tabular form, and noise while needing less memory compared to alternatives that also match the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected as it handles tabular data well and is suitable for large datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset properties. Despite the low memory requirement, VAE's compatibility with large datasets and noisy data, as well as short training times, make it a suitable choice given the other models have more significant drawbacks with respect to noisy data or low-signal data handling.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it is well-suited for large tabular datasets with noisy data, a characteristic of the provided dataset. Additionally, VAE can utilize a GPU, allowing it to handle large datasets efficiently. Although it typically requires high memory, its short training time makes it a feasible choice given the constraints. It’s important to note that VAE may struggle with discrete or categorical data, which is not mentioned as a characteristic of the dataset, making it a compatible choice.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice as it handles large datasets effectively and performs well on tabular data, which fits the dataset properties. Although it requires high memory, it can manage noisy data and offers short training times. Other models like AE1SVM and ALAD also support large datasets and tabular data but have weaknesses related to noisy data or low memory. VAE stands out with its strengths aligning closely to the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it handles tabular and noisy data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It also scales well to large datasets and has a short training time, which suits the 'large' data size requirement. Although it has a weakness in handling low memory, it is the best choice given the need for handling noisy and low-signal data in large tabular datasets.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: letter\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized datasets and works well with tabular data. It is particularly advantageous for scenarios requiring low memory usage, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. VAE also excels in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, providing short training times, which enhances its applicability for a medium-scale tabular dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the dataset as it supports tabular data, which is the type of data in this case. It also handles high dimensionality and noisy data, which might be present in the dataset, and has a short training time, making it efficient for medium-sized data. Although it requires high memory, which is a limitation given the low memory requirement, its compatibility with the dataset type and medium data size makes it favorable compared to other models. Other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, and MO-GAAL have greater weaknesses with tabular data or memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and it is capable of handling medium data sizes effectively. Additionally, it offers low memory usage, a crucial factor considering the additional requirements of the dataset. LUNAR's short training time and scalability to large datasets are further advantageous, making it a strong candidate for the given dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and medium-sized datasets, which aligns with our dataset's properties. It efficiently handles high dimensionality and offers fast training times while requiring GPU resources, fitting the requirement of low memory usage. Although it uses high memory, its other strengths closely match the dataset's characteristics, making it the most suitable choice among the listed models.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized and primarily tabular, and there is a requirement for low memory usage. Among the models, AutoEncoder is one of the few that explicitly supports tabular data well. Although high memory usage is a weakness mentioned, the medium data size implies that memory usage will be more manageable. AutoEncoder also benefits from short training times and scalability, making it a practical choice for a medium-sized dataset with the potential need for scalability. This makes AutoEncoder the best choice among the available options considering the constraints and characteristics specified.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is capable of handling medium-sized datasets efficiently and supports low memory usage due to its short training time. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, allowing for potential future extensions in dataset size. The model's ability to work with high dimensionality and noisy data aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite a weakness in handling small data sizes, it is not a concern here given the medium data size of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized datasets and works well with tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which can be advantageous given the unspecified characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, the VAE model supports short training times and can scale to large datasets, fitting the low memory requirement better than models with high memory needs.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized with tabular data, requiring a model that supports low memory usage. VAE is well-suited for tabular data, as it is designed for high dimensionality and can handle noisy data well. Although VAE traditionally requires high memory, its compatibility with tabular data outweighs this downside given the alternatives. Moreover, it offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it a suitable choice for the requirements specified.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets and has strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data. It is also capable of short training times and scalability to large datasets, which fits the dataset's requirement. Although VAE requires high memory, it is the closest match among the model list for handling tabular data with good performance characteristics suited for the provided dataset properties. Other models have weaknesses in handling tabular data or low memory requirements more explicitly.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is highly suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It is capable of handling medium-sized datasets efficiently due to its strength in scalability to large datasets. Additionally, VAE has a short training time, which meets the low memory requirement of the dataset. Despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, the dataset's tags do not indicate these challenges, making VAE an appropriate choice.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is highly suitable for tabular data and can efficiently handle medium-sized datasets. It supports tabular data and has a short training time, making it ideal given the requirement for low memory usage. Although it can be computationally intensive, its ability to operate on tabular data with necessary scalability aligns well with the dataset needs. Additionally, LUNAR's strength in handling sparse and imbalanced data could be beneficial depending on the dataset characteristics. Its strengths align with the dataset properties and additional requirements better than other models in the provided list.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is characterized as medium-sized tabular data with low memory requirements. VAE is well-suited for tabular data and large datasets, providing short training times, which is beneficial given the need for low memory usage. Despite having high memory usage in its weakness, VAE's ability to handle high dimensionality and its strength in dealing with tabular data make it a suitable choice compared to other models, which have more substantial weaknesses with tabular data or low memory environments.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular data, aligning well with the dataset's properties. It supports low memory usage and possesses strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which fits the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for this medium-sized tabular dataset with a requirement for low memory usage. It has strengths in handling tabular data and medium datasets efficiently while providing short training times. Although it typically requires high memory, it is the best compromise considering other models either do not handle tabular data well or have significant weaknesses related to low memory or small datasets which do not align as closely with the dataset tags and requirements as VAE does.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular data and aligns well with the low memory requirement, which is a stated need for the dataset. It has strengths in handling tabular data and offers short training time with relatively efficient memory usage, making it a suitable choice. While it may have weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data, this was not specified as a dataset characteristic, and it supports high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized and consists of tabular data, with a requirement for low memory consumption. Among the potential models, VAE stands out as it supports tabular data well, performs efficiently with high dimensionality, and is suited for medium to larger datasets with a short training time. While it typically requires higher memory, its other strengths align closely with the dataset needs, and it is more applicable to tabular data compared to most other models in the list. VAE also balances well against its weaknesses, which are less of a concern here given the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable due to its compatibility with tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. It handles sparse and imbalanced data well, which is beneficial for the dataset characteristics, even though specific characteristics aren't listed. Although it is labeled as high memory, LUNAR supports low-dimensional datasets, aligning with the dataset's low memory requirement. It also boasts a short training time, which is advantageous for efficiency given the 'medium' data size. Its ability to scale to large datasets aligns well with possible future dataset expansions.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the best choice since it has strengths in handling medium-sized, tabular data with high dimensionality while supporting GPU processing, which aligns well with the dataset properties. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which could bring future scalability benefits despite the current medium size requirement. Though it requires high memory, its short training time compensates for this during processing. Other models either have significant weaknesses with tabular data or suffer from memory issues and not being scalable.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. It handles tabular data effectively, works well with high dimensionality, has a relatively short training time, and manages noisy data. Although it has a high memory requirement, it supports large datasets and GPU acceleration, which can mitigate memory constraints. Other models either have significant weaknesses with tabular data or require low memory, scalability issues, or long training times.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and is effective on medium-sized datasets. It also has strengths in handling high-dimensional and noisy data, which might align well with the needs of the dataset, and it offers short training times. Although it has a high memory requirement, VAE is capable of handling large datasets, making it suitable for medium-sized datasets that aim for low memory usage, more so than the other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is a suitable choice as it works well with medium-sized tabular datasets, aligning with one of the strengths 'tabular data'. It also has the ability to handle high-dimensional data and is scalable to large datasets, which fits the medium data size requirement. Moreover, VAE offers short training times, which is beneficial given the requirement for low memory usage. It does not possess strengths specifically disqualified by weaknesses related to medium data size with low memory, unlike other models that face serious memory constraints or are inefficient with tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it is specifically strong with tabular data, which matches the dataset type. VAE can handle medium-sized datasets efficiently and offers short training time, aligning well with the low memory requirement. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, this model is most well-suited among the options given the dataset's additional requirement for low memory and the nature of the tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized and consists of tabular data with a requirement for low memory usage. The AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data and has strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data, which might be relevant here. It offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which align with a medium data size requirement. While the AutoEncoder requires high memory, it is the best option among the models listed that fits the tabular data type and has the least conflict with the requirement for low memory, as other models have more significant weaknesses or aren't suited to tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also has strengths in handling tabular data and works well with GPUs, accommodating the 'low memory' requirement by supporting short training times. Although high memory can be a potential weakness, the VAE provides a good balance considering the dataset's needs, in contrast to other models like AnoGAN and AE1SVM that have more significant weaknesses related to the dataset's properties.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it specifically supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also capable of handling sparse and imbalanced data effectively, aligning with potential dataset characteristics. Furthermore, LUNAR excels with low-dimensional data, and the short training time requirement fits the additional criteria of low memory usage. These strengths make it more aligned with the dataset's needs compared to other models in the list, which are either unsuitable for tabular data or have high memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the best choice given the dataset properties and model characteristics. The dataset is medium-sized tabular data and requires a model with low memory consumption. LUNAR is explicitly designed for tabular data, offers short training times, and scales well to large datasets. Although it has weaknesses related to high memory, in the context of medium data size and the requirement for tabular data processing, LUNAR's strengths align closely with the dataset needs, unlike other models which have significant weaknesses such as low memory or are not suited for tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, aligns with the medium-sized dataset requirement, and offers low memory usage while also being scalable to large datasets. It addresses high dimensionality and noisy data, which could be relevant to the dataset characteristics. Despite its weaknesses with certain data types like discrete or categorical data, VAEs generally handle tabular data well when numerical data is predominant.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model as it has strengths in handling tabular data and medium-sized datasets, aligning well with the dataset properties. Additionally, it efficiently works with high-dimensional data and requires low memory, which matches the dataset's requirements. Although it may not perform optimally with discrete or categorical data, this is a lesser concern compared to its well-suited nature for the other dataset properties. This makes VAE the optimal choice despite its dependence on well-tuned hyperparameters.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset consists of medium-sized tabular data, with a requirement for low memory usage. The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the medium data size. It provides short training times which is beneficial in terms of resource efficiency. Although AutoEncoder typically requires higher memory, its strengths in processing tabular data with scalability and short training times make it a more balanced choice compared to other models, whose weaknesses more seriously conflict with the dataset requirements, such as low memory or unsuitability for tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset consists of medium-sized tabular data with a requirement for low memory usage. Among the models listed, VAE is highlighted for its strengths in handling tabular data and its suitability for medium to large datasets. Although it typically requires high memory, it is still more suited than other models due to its short training time and capability to manage high-dimensional data. Other models like AE1SVM, ALAD, and AutoEncoder also excel in tabular data but have weaknesses related to low memory which aligns with VAE better than other available models.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Additionally, it supports medium-sized datasets with short training time requirements and is scalable to large datasets. Despite its need for high memory, VAE compensates with the use of GPU, allowing it to handle more complex data without significant memory concerns. These features match the requirements of low memory usage and medium data size, making VAE the most suitable model for the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is well-suited for tabular data and can handle high-dimensional, noisy data with short training times, making it efficient for medium-sized datasets. While it requires high memory, VAE is among the few models that are compatible with the dataset properties, providing a balance between performance and capability.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties as it is strong with tabular data, which fits the dataset type. It has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it compatible with a medium-sized dataset. Despite using high memory, VAE does not list low memory as a weakness, making it a viable option considering the additional requirement of low memory. Furthermore, the VAE model aligns with the need for handling noisy data, whereas other models like AnoGAN, SO-GAAL, AE1SVM, and ALAD particularly mention tabular data as a weakness.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also handles low-dimensional datasets and is scalable to large datasets, aligning with the medium data size of the dataset. LUNAR's capability of short training time meets the low memory requirement of the dataset. While LUNAR does have high memory as a weakness, this is mitigated by its strengths in handling tabular data efficiently compared to other models. Additionally, LUNAR does not have weaknesses related to tabular data, making it a strong candidate given the dataset properties. Other models, such as AnoGAN and AE1SVM, have significant weaknesses in low memory environments, which were emphasized as additional requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is of medium size and tabular in nature, with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is suitable for tabular data and is efficient with regard to memory usage, especially when compared to other options that are typically more memory-intensive. It also handles high-dimensionality and noisy data well, which aligns with potential characteristics of the dataset. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, it is a strong fit given the current dataset properties and constraints, particularly in terms of supporting tabular data and offering a short training time.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Dataset Tags indicate the need for a model suitable for medium-sized tabular data and with low memory requirements. VAE is a suitable choice because it directly supports tabular data, is efficient with high-dimensional data, and requires short training time, which can be beneficial for low memory settings. While VAE does have a weakness with high memory usage, it offers short training time, making it manageable in medium-sized datasets. It is the best fit among available options despite its minor drawbacks in memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with a requirement for low memory consumption. AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and offers short training times which are advantageous for medium-sized datasets. While AutoEncoder might generally require high memory, it does not have low memory as a weakness, unlike some other models in the list. Additionally, AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets, ensuring flexibility in handling the size needs of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data and medium-sized datasets, which aligns well with the dataset properties. It handles tabular data effectively, and although it has high memory usage, it boasts a short training time and scalability to larger datasets, which can be beneficial given the dataset's medium size. While the dataset requires low memory, VAE's benefits align well with the strengths of the data, making it a strong candidate among the given options.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium sized and tabular, and there is a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is suitable for tabular data and can handle high dimensionalities with the potential for short training times. Despite its higher memory usage listed as a weakness, its overall strengths in handling tabular data make it the best fit among the provided models, especially given the dataset's characteristics and absence of other models perfectly matching low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with a low memory requirement. Among the listed models, AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data and has strengths in handling noisy data, high dimensionality, and providing short training times. It is also scalable to large datasets, which aligns with medium dataset size. Although AutoEncoder requires high memory, among the available models, it aligns best with the dataset requirements due to its compatibility with tabular data and its efficiency in handling medium-sized datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is a suitable model for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. It also supports medium data sizes and has low memory requirements, aligning with the need for low memory usage. Furthermore, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it a good fit for the medium-sized dataset. Unlike other models with weaknesses in memory usage and/or tabular data, LUNAR aligns well with all the key dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable for the given dataset properties. It handles tabular data well, which matches the dataset type. VAE also requires medium data size, which is compatible with the dataset size. Although it typically demands high memory, it provides short training times and can scale to large datasets, making it an efficient choice considering the additional requirement of low memory. Despite weaknesses such as issues with discrete data or imbalanced data, these do not conflict directly with the dataset's characteristics making VAE a fitting option.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset consists of medium-sized tabular data with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is suitable for tabular data and works well with medium to large datasets, which aligns with the given data size. Although it usually requires high memory, it is preferred due to its strengths in handling tabular data and short training time, which can be beneficial if memory can be optimized or managed. The low memory constraint was difficult to satisfy perfectly with the options available, but VAE remains the closest match among the models provided.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and has the additional advantage of being able to handle imbalanced and sparse data effectively. It also benefits from a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the requirement for low memory usage. Despite its hyperparameter sensitivity and high memory weakness, it fits well for a medium-sized tabular dataset while supporting the low memory necessity more than the other options.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is suitable for medium-sized tabular data as it has strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also has short training time and is scalable to large datasets while being compatible with GPU acceleration, which is beneficial for meeting the low memory requirement. Although its weaknesses include small data size, it is not an issue with the medium data size provided. Other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, and AE1SVM have weaknesses specifically in tabular data or low memory constraints that do not align well with the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is best suited for the given dataset properties because it is adept at handling tabular data and medium-sized datasets, which aligns well with the dataset tags of 'medium' and 'tabular data'. Additionally, AutoEncoder can work efficiently with 'low memory', fulfilling the additional requirement, while providing strengths in scenarios involving high dimensionality and noisy data. Although it has weaknesses with small data size, it remains scalable to medium datasets, making it the most suitable choice given the characteristics of this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data, which is the main type of data in the given dataset. It handles medium-sized datasets effectively and operates efficiently with a GPU, which aligns well with the 'low memory' requirement. Additionally, it offers short training times suitable for the dataset's characteristics. While it may not be the best with imbalanced or sparse data, the dataset provided does not prioritize these attributes, making VAE a good match given the circumstances.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized and consists of tabular data, with a requirement for low memory usage. Among the models, VAE is suitable for tabular data and supports medium dataset sizes, fitting well with the dataset's properties. Although VAE is not inherently low memory, it presents a balanced option with its additional strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, alongside its capability for short training times. Other models either have significant weaknesses in tabular data, such as AnoGAN, or involve high memory usage and are not explicitly optimized for low memory environments which could be mitigated in the VAE's architecture.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is a suitable choice because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and is efficient in handling high-dimensional data with low memory requirements. While it requires high memory, it meets the criteria of low training time and scalability, which aligns with the dataset's medium size and need for low memory usage. Other models like AE1SVM and ALAD also handle tabular data well, but they have weaknesses with low memory, making VAE the better fit given its strengths and alignment with the dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is well-suited for tabular data of medium size, which matches this dataset's characteristics. VAE excels at handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset tags. Despite its known weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these are not primary concerns given the dataset description. Additionally, VAE operates with relatively low memory compared to some other models, making it suitable for this requirement as long as the high memory demand isn't excessive. The short training time and scalability fit well with the dataset's medium size.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: musk\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"high dimensionality\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for high-dimensional and tabular data, which fits the dataset characteristics. Despite its weakness in CPU environments, its strengths in handling high dimensionality, sparse data, and short training time align well with the dataset's requirements. Additionally, AE1SVM's ability to work with medium-sized datasets and its scalability makes it an appropriate choice for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, high-dimensional, and in tabular format with a requirement for CPU capability. The AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data and can handle high dimensionality well. While it usually performs better on a GPU, it can operate within a CPU setting if necessary, and it does not have critical weaknesses that directly conflict with the dataset properties. Despite its GPU preference, the short training time and scalability to large datasets make it a fitting choice given the medium data size and tabular nature.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and has high dimensionality, with a need for CPU compatibility. The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data and handles high dimensionality effectively. It offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset size. Despite having a weakness regarding CPU use, the AutoEncoder's strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data make it the most appropriate choice among the provided models.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It handles high dimensionality effectively and supports tabular data. Despite its weakness with CPU and long training times, its overall strengths, including high dimensionality, scalability to large datasets, and applicability to tabular data, make it a better fit than other models which either lack in tabular data support or are suboptimal for CPU usage.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data with high dimensionality and efficiently handles noisy data. It is optimized for high memory environments and has a short training time, making it a good fit for working on CPU despite its preference for GPU. The weakness regarding CPU usage is less critical compared to its strengths appropriate for the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for medium-sized, high dimensional tabular data as it explicitly lists tabular data and high dimensionality as its strengths. Additionally, despite its weakness on CPU, it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics, and it has a short training time, making it efficient for medium datasets. The model also supports scalability to large datasets, which is advantageous if the data size increases.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is best suited for the given dataset properties as it specifically supports tabular data and efficiently handles high dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It has strengths in short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns with the medium data size of the dataset. While it performs best on GPU, its capability with tabular data in high-dimensional settings outweighs its weakness on CPU usage compared to the alternatives.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and high-dimensional, with a requirement for CPU. AutoEncoder supports tabular and high-dimensional data effectively and is scalable to large datasets. While it often utilizes GPU, its strengths align well with the dataset tags compared to other models in the list. This choice balances the dataset's characteristics and the need for scalability, despite the CPU requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It excels in handling imbalanced and sparse data, offers short training time, and scalability to large datasets. Although AE1SVM has a weakness in using CPU and handling noisy data, the dataset does not particularly emphasize these factors, making it a strong candidate for the given requirements. Additionally, AE1SVM supports medium data sizes, aligning well with the dataset's constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the best choice for this dataset because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, a key characteristic of the dataset provided. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, and offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is advantageous given the 'medium' data size. Although it prefers a GPU environment, which is a typical situation, its ability to process tabular data effectively makes it the most appropriate option from the list. It also supports efficient training and data reconstruction tasks pertinent in similar data domains.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset as it performs well with high dimensionality and tabular data, which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and requires only short training times, which is beneficial given the CPU requirement. Although AE1SVM generally utilizes GPU and high memory, it has strengths in high dimensionality and tabular data, making it a fitting choice for this medium-sized dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice given its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, AE1SVM is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the medium dataset size. While it is not the best for CPU-only environments, its overall fit considering tabular data and high dimensionality makes it the best candidate among the provided options.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected because it is highly suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It also supports handling noisy data and has a short training time, making it efficient for medium-sized datasets. Furthermore, it is scalable to large datasets and performs well with GPU acceleration, although a CPU will be used per the requirements. While it does have a weakness with CPU, its strengths in handling high dimensional tabular data outweigh this factor compared to the other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized with tabular data characterized by high dimensionality, and the requirement for CPU usage. The AutoEncoder model is a strong fit due to its suitability for tabular data and high dimensionality. It handles noisy data effectively and has a short training time, which compensates for potential CPU limitations. While it is primarily optimized for GPU, its scalability to large datasets and compatibility with tabular data make it the most appropriate choice given the dataset characteristics. Despite the CPU limitation, its strengths align well with the dataset's needs compared to other models on the list.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also supports handling noisy data and is efficient with a GPU, providing short training times and scalability to large datasets. Despite its weakness with CPU usage, its strengths significantly match the dataset characteristics, making it the most suitable choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics provided. Although it requires GPU and typically runs with high memory, it benefits from short training times and scalability to large datasets. Importantly, its strengths cover high-dimensional tabular data on CPU if necessary, matching the constraint not explicitly depending on GPU resources. While AE1SVM has some issues with CPU preference, its ability to handle high-dimensional tabular data and short training time makes it the most appropriate choice given the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data and handles high dimensionality well, which aligns with the dataset properties. Although it has a weakness with CPU requirements, it stands out for providing short training times, capability with large datasets, and good performance on tabular data, making it a better fit for the dataset needs compared to others that are more GPU-dependent or suited for other dataset types.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is suitable for medium-sized tabular data with high dimensionality and can handle noisy data. Although it generally prefers GPU, it is more advantageous than other models since it is scalable to large datasets, provides short training times, and excels in high-dimensional scenarios, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics despite the preference for CPU.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset as it efficiently handles tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it excels in dealing with sparse and imbalanced data, and is capable of processing a medium-sized dataset effectively. Although it has a weakness regarding CPU usage, it compensates with its strengths like short training time and scalability, making it the most suitable model among the provided options, especially given its strengths with tabular data and high dimensionality.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It also supports short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it suitable for medium-sized data. While it has a weakness related to CPU performance, the strengths in dealing with tabular data and high dimensionality make it the best match among the given options.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice because it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics, such as being medium-sized, containing tabular data, and having high dimensionality. Despite the preference for GPU, the dataset requires CPU compatibility, but AutoEncoder's strength in handling high-dimensional tabular data, scalability to large datasets, and short training time offsets this limitation with acceptable compromise compared to the weaknesses of the other models. Other models either lack support for tabular data or have training time/scalability issues, making AutoEncoder the best-fit model from the given list.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is a suitable model for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data. It aligns well with the dataset's characteristics, such as high dimensionality and tabular data. VAE's strengths include handling tabular data and high-dimensional data effectively, despite some weaknesses with CPU usage. Its short training time and suitability for high-dimensional datasets make it an ideal choice over other models which are more suited for GPU use or have constraints on data type or size.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is suitable for the given dataset properties as it excels with tabular data and high dimensionality, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. It also has a short training time and scales well to large datasets, which is beneficial given the medium data size. Although the dataset requires models that can leverage a CPU, the strengths in handling tabular and high-dimensional data make AutoEncoder a fitting choice despite its GPU preference.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected because it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also handles noisy data efficiently and can work with medium-sized datasets, offering short training times. While it generally requires a GPU, which may not align perfectly with the CPU requirement, its overall strengths and ability to work with high-dimensional tabular data make it the most suitable choice given the options. Other models have significant weaknesses with tabular data, high dimensionality, or CPU constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data and handles high dimensionality well. It also has a short training time, which is beneficial for medium-sized datasets processed on CPU. While there is a weakness with CPU, its overall strengths outweigh this, especially given the dataset's focus on tabular high dimensional data.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is particularly suitable for the given dataset properties as it is strong in handling high dimensional tabular data and is effective on medium-sized datasets. It capitalizes on its strengths in high dimensionality and works well with tabular data, matching well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its weakness of needing a GPU, other models on the list also predominantly rely on GPUs. AE1SVM offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, fitting the computational requirement of using a CPU effectively, hence making it the best choice for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it handles tabular data and high dimensionality effectively, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Although VAE is typically optimized for GPU, it accommodates high dimensionality and is performant for medium-sized datasets. Additionally, VAE is known for its short training time and ability to handle large datasets, making it an optimal choice for a medium-sized dataset with high dimensionality without an immediate need for CPU-specific optimization.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for a medium-sized tabular dataset with high dimensionality while using CPU. It is well-suited for tabular data and high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Moreover, AE1SVM's ability to handle sparse and imbalanced data adds robustness to the selection, despite its weakness with CPU utilization. Given its strengths in these areas and short training time, it matches the dataset requirements better than the other models.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it handles tabular data well and excels with high dimensionality, which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, AE1SVM is capable of using a CPU, which aligns with the requirement, even though it generally prefers GPU. Its strengths include handling sparse and imbalanced data, which, while not explicitly mentioned in the dataset tags, could be beneficial if such characteristics are present. Despite requiring high memory and being generally GPU-optimized, the compatibility with CPU environments makes it a better choice over others, which have CPU explicitly as a weakness.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for handling medium-sized tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It has strengths in processing tabular data, high dimensional datasets, and it can efficiently handle noisy data. While it is optimized for GPU, its ability to handle high dimensionality and noise with a short training time makes it the most suitable choice among models listed, despite the additional CPU requirement, compared to other models whose weaknesses include handling tabular data or CPU limitations.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. The dataset has medium data size, tabular data format, high dimensionality, and needs to be processed on a CPU. AE1SVM excels at handling high dimensionality and tabular data, and it is scalable to large datasets. Although its strength lies in GPU usage, its capability in managing high dimensionality and short training time makes it a good fit. Other models either have weaknesses with tabular data or require GPU processing, or are not suited for CPU-oriented environments.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset based on its compatibility with the dataset characteristics. The dataset is tabular, medium-sized, and has high dimensionality, which aligns well with AE1SVM's strengths. It is good at handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and can be scaled to large datasets. While it has a weakness related to CPU, which is a requirement, the model's strengths in handling tabular data and scalability outweigh this, making it the best choice among the given options.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it excels in handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It supports medium-sized datasets and offers short training times, making it efficient for CPU environments. Additionally, its capability to handle noisy data and scalability to large datasets align well with the dataset's properties and computational requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the best choice for this dataset because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it has strengths in addressing imbalanced data, which might be useful in tabular datasets. While it generally relies on GPU for optimal performance, it has some flexibility and can work with medium data size and requires limited scalability, allowing for potential CPU execution with short training time. The model's ability to manage various domains, including technology and finance, makes it adaptable to 'others' domains, offering a balance between strengths and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is strong in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite its weakness in CPU usage, its strengths in short training time, scalability to large datasets, and capability to process medium-sized datasets make it the ideal choice. AE1SVM also supports imbalanced and sparse data, which, although not explicitly mentioned in the dataset tags, could be beneficial. Compared to other models, AE1SVM presents the best balance of strengths that align with the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well suited for high dimensional tabular data as indicated in the dataset properties. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and works well with tabular data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, AutoEncoder has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which fits the requirement for utilizing CPU resources efficiently, even though it is primarily optimized for GPU usage. Its minor inefficiencies related to CPU are outweighed by its alignment with the key dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AE1SVM model is the most suitable choice as it handles high dimensional data well, which is a characteristic of the dataset. It supports tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset, and is capable for use cases on CPU. While it has a weakness related to noisy data and CPU, other models have more significant weaknesses in areas critical to the dataset such as 'CPU compatibility' and 'high dimensionality'. Additionally, AE1SVM has strengths in handling sparse data and can scale to large datasets which aligns with a 'medium' dataset size.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it is particularly strong with high dimensional tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. It is efficient for medium-sized datasets, provides quick training times, and is appropriate for high-dimensional problems. While it mentions CPU as a weakness, its compatibility with tabular data, short training times, and ability to handle high dimensionality make it a good fit given the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is chosen as it is suitable for tabular data and handles high dimensionality well, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also supports medium data size and can operate efficiently under CPU constraints, despite being optimized for GPU. Additionally, it has strengths in handling noisy data and provides a scalable solution for datasets that aren't small, while offering a short training time.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it excels in handling high-dimensional and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It supports high dimensionality and is well-suited for tabular data, as required. Additionally, while AE1SVM performs better with GPUs, it is a good choice for high-dimensional data on CPU, making it the best fit given the CPU requirement mentioned in the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset has medium size, high dimensionality, and is tabular, with a preference for CPU usage. The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data, high dimensionality, and can handle noisy data effectively. Although it is optimized for GPU, its strengths align well with the dataset's characteristics. While AutoEncoder generally requires high memory, it is still a good fit given the dataset is medium-sized and the primary requirement is for it to run on CPU which can be a trade-off for the weakness.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it is well-suited for handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it performs well with CPU and has a short training time while providing scalability to large datasets, matching the dataset's medium size requirement. Although it has some weaknesses with noisy data, this is not a primary concern given the dataset's description.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is most suitable for the given dataset as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data well, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it performs well with imbalanced data which could be a concern, and though it normally uses GPU, it's scalable to large datasets with a short training time. Its primary weakness related to CPU dependency is less impactful here since other strengths outweigh the others.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It effectively handles tabular data and high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it supports GPU usage and has a short training time, making it compatible with CPU requirements when not specifically needing high memory. AE1SVM's strengths with high dimensionality, sparse data, imbalanced data, and scalability to large datasets perfectly match the dataset's characteristics and additional requirements, making it a very good choice compared to other models that have limitations on CPU or tabular datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for medium-sized, high-dimensional, tabular data using CPU resources. It is strong in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. While it is generally GPU-optimized, its additional strengths outweigh this, as it is scalable to large datasets and offers short training time. Unlike other models, AE1SVM doesn't explicitly require a GPU, making it adaptable for CPU needs while effectively managing high-dimensional tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is chosen because it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which are characteristics of the given dataset. Additionally, AE1SVM has strengths in dealing with imbalanced and sparse data, and it can be scaled to large datasets. Despite its weakness with CPU usage, AE1SVM provides a good balance of strengths specifically aligned with the dataset requirements when considering the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice for the given dataset as it supports high dimensional tabular data, which is a key aspect of the dataset. Although its strengths are typically GPU-oriented, it also has short training times which can mitigate CPU limitations. It is well-suited for handling tabular data and has strength in managing high dimensionality, making it ideal for the dataset at hand. Despite CPU preference being a weakness, AE1SVM compensates with its other strengths relevant to the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset properties. It handles high dimensionality effectively and is scalable to large datasets. Although it usually benefits from GPU, it does not have a major strength or weakness associated with CPU, making it a reasonable choice given the requirement. Additionally, it offers a short training time, which is beneficial for medium datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: Deep SVDD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Deep SVDD is well-suited for high dimensional datasets and can handle tabular data effectively. It leverages GPU acceleration and scales to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset's medium size and requirement for high dimensionality. While high memory is a consideration, the absence of a specific need for low memory allows for leveraging Deep SVDD's strengths effectively over its weaknesses, making it a suitable choice over other models in the list that either do not well-support tabular data, have prohibitive weaknesses on CPU, or have other disqualifying weaknesses for this specific scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and its compatibility with tabular data. Additionally, it supports CPU-based processing, which aligns with the additional requirement of CPU. While it has weaknesses in terms of long training time on CPUs and handling simple linear patterns, the given dataset's characteristics of medium size and the nature of the data as tabular make AE1SVM a strong candidate, given its strengths outweigh its weaknesses in this context.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: vowels\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"low-signal data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it excels with tabular data, requires short training time, and is scalable to large datasets. It also handles imbalanced and sparse data well, which aligns with the dataset's low-signal and low memory requirements. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data, LUNAR offers a balanced trade-off among the models listed for the provided dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected as it aligns well with the dataset properties. It is specifically strong with tabular data and a medium data size. Although it generally prefers high memory, it features short training times which might mitigate memory constraints. Furthermore, while it does have weaknesses regarding imbalanced data and real-time data, these do not conflict directly with the dataset properties provided, making it a suitable choice. Its strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality fit well with the dataset requirements despite the low-signal nature of the data.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It supports tabular data, which aligns with our dataset type, and handles low memory requirements with short training time. Despite its weakness with discrete or categorical data, the dataset characteristics like 'low-signal data' and 'medium size' are not directly contradicted by the VAE. While it does require high memory, its strength in tabular data and efficient handling of high dimensionality make it the best fit compared to other models that have more significant weaknesses with low-signal data or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it can effectively handle tabular data, which is one of the strengths of the model. Despite the low-signal data being a concern, VAE is compatible with medium-sized datasets and has a short training time, aligning well with the low memory requirement. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets which offers room for future data growth. Although it might face challenges with imbalanced data and requires high memory, the overall characteristics of VAE align better with the given dataset properties compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data and performs well on medium-sized datasets, which fits the dataset tag properties. Despite the low-signal characteristic of the data, VAE's robustness in handling noisy and high-dimensional data can help uncover valuable insights. It also aligns with the requirement for low memory usage compared to many other listed models. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it a good fit for the constraints and characteristics detailed in the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and performs well with medium-sized datasets, which align with the dataset properties. While it is noted for high memory usage, it compensates with a short training time and scalability to large datasets. Moreover, it does not have a weakness for low-signal data, which is important given the dataset characteristic. In comparison to other models, VAE covers the dataset requirements more closely while avoiding critical weaknesses that conflict with the data characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and has low-signal data characteristics with a low memory requirement. VAE supports tabular data and handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, fitting the dataset type and characteristics. Despite its high memory usage, VAE's ability to handle medium data sizes with a short training time makes it the most appropriate model compared to others which either do not handle tabular data well or have weaknesses with low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It efficiently handles medium-sized datasets with short training times and doesn't rely on high memory, which is suitable given the low memory requirement. Despite its weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, the focus on tabular data with short training times makes it the most appropriate choice given the dataset properties and overall constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice as it has strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. Additionally, it is capable of dealing with high dimensionality and has a short training time, which are beneficial for low-signal data. While it does have weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, the medium data size and low memory constraints can be managed effectively with VAE as it is scalable for large datasets and optimized for GPU, aligning well with the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for the given dataset properties which include tabular data and low-signal data. It is efficient with tabular data and works well with low-dimensional and sparse data. Although LUNAR typically requires high memory, it offers short training times and is scalable to large datasets, which balances well with maintaining low memory footprint through efficient resource management. The other models either have weaknesses with tabular data, low memory, or low-signal data, making LUNAR the most aligned choice based on the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It handles medium-sized datasets efficiently and has a short training time, which meets the 'low memory' requirement. Although it is not ideally suited for low-signal data, it offers a balance between the dataset needs and model capabilities in the given model list, unlike other models with significant weaknesses related to the dataset's key requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it handles tabular data well, which aligns with the dataset’s data type. It has strengths in high dimensionality and short training time, which is suitable for the medium-sized dataset. Although it generally requires high memory, its ability to process tabular data with high dimensionality outweighs this weakness under the given constraints. Other models either have significant weaknesses in handling tabular data, low-signal data, or require low memory, which are crucial requirements for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It performs well with medium-sized datasets and supports high dimensionality, which is beneficial for low-signal data to extract meaningful patterns. VAE also has short training times and can handle noisy data well. While it may require high memory, it does not have explicit constraints on low memory. The other models either have significant weaknesses in handling tabular data or low-signal data, making VAE the best fit based on the given properties and analyses.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for tabular data and can handle medium-sized datasets efficiently with a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of being medium-sized, low-signal, and requiring low memory usage. It also performs well with high dimensionality and noisy data, making it a fit for the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset characteristics include medium-sized tabular data with low-signal, and a requirement for low memory utilization. VAE is suitable for tabular data and can handle high dimensionality, which might be important for extracting meaningful patterns from low-signal data. Although VAE typically uses high memory, it is the best fit from the given options as it can handle large datasets and has a short training time, which is beneficial for resource constraints. Additionally, the low-signal data challenge can be mitigated by VAE's capability to model complex relationships in tabular datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which corresponds with the dataset's nature. It also offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the 'medium' data size. Additionally, LUNAR accommodates low memory requirements, making it an appropriate choice given the low-memory constraint. Although it is not specifically noted for low-signal data, its overall compatibility with the dataset's properties makes it the best option among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular data and is known for its short training time and capability to handle high dimensionality and noisy data. While it typically requires high memory, its strengths align well with the dataset's characteristics, particularly its ability to work effectively with tabular data and manage low-signal conditions. Despite the low memory preference, VAE has a combination of strengths that match most of the dataset needs better than the other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data and can handle medium-sized datasets effectively. It demonstrates strengths in high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns well with the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset. Although VAE typically uses high memory, the low memory requirement is less emphasized than other constraints such as compatibility with tabular data and noisy data handling, making VAE the most aligned choice among the provided models.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data and efficiently handles low-memory requirements, which are critical for the given dataset characteristics. It performs well with medium-sized datasets and is scalable to large datasets, matching the dataset's medium size. Additionally, LUNAR has strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data, which could provide better robustness in dealing with low-signal data characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a suitable choice because it specifically mentions strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the data type of the dataset. It also supports high dimensionality, which may be beneficial even if the dataset is medium-sized. The dataset requires low memory, and while VAE prefers high memory, it compensates with a short training time and scalability to larger datasets, which can be optimized to fit medium-sized data requirements. Additionally, its requirement for 'noisy data' aligns well with the low-signal characteristics of the dataset, providing robustness in signal extraction and data interpretation.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets with low memory requirements. It supports tabular data and is efficient in handling datasets with low signal due to its short training time and the capacity to deal with noisy data. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced data, this is not a primary concern in the given dataset properties. Additionally, its requirement for high memory is noted, but this is less problematic than other model weaknesses in the context of the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It has strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the data type provided. Although it requires high memory, it offers short training times, making it preferable for medium-sized datasets with low-signal characteristics. The weaknesses of the VAE, such as difficulties with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, are less concerning given the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, VAE is scalable to large datasets, which offers flexibility in case the dataset size increases in the future.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this scenario due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns well with the dataset's data type. It is well-suited for medium-sized datasets due to its scalability to large datasets and short training time. Moreover, it is tailored to handle low memory requirements, matching the additional requirements of the dataset. While it may suffer from hyperparameter sensitivity and high memory in other contexts, these concerns are mitigated by its alignment with the dataset's characteristics and requirements. Its ability to work with low-dimensional datasets also makes it appropriate given the low-signal data characteristic, despite this not being its primary strength.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset properties. It handles medium data sizes well, and although it has the weakness of requiring high memory, the dataset’s requirement for low memory might be offset by VAE's short training time and scalability to large datasets. VAE's capability to work with high dimensionality and its short training time align well with the dataset’s characteristics and additional requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the best choice for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and its capability to work with low-memory settings, making it well-suited for medium-sized datasets with low signal. While VAE is not ideal for discrete or categorical data, it aligns well with the dataset's requirement for low memory usage and has a short training time, accommodating the low-memory characteristic more effectively than other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is a suitable choice for this medium-sized tabular dataset with low memory requirements. It has strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and supports GPU for efficient processing. Despite the low-signal nature of the data, VAE can perform well with proper hyperparameter tuning. Other models either have weaknesses in dealing with tabular data, low-signal data, or have high memory requirements, making VAE the best option from the provided list for the given dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and possesses low-signal characteristics, with a low memory requirement. VAE is suitable for tabular data and possesses strengths in handling high-dimensional data and noisy data. Although VAE typically requires high memory, it doesn't feature specific weaknesses with respect to low memory, and it has a short training time which is beneficial for medium-sized datasets. Out of all the models, VAE matches most of the dataset requirements effectively while minimizing weaknesses relevant to the dataset's properties.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a medium-sized tabular dataset with low-signal characteristics and a requirement for low memory usage. Among the models listed, VAE is suitable for tabular data and fits well with medium-sized datasets. Although VAE typically requires high memory, it has strengths in handling high-dimensional and noisy data, which can somewhat accommodate low-signal characteristics. Its short training time is beneficial given the memory constraints. Overall, VAE offers the best balance given the dataset features and the constraints listed.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with a low-significance signal and low memory requirements. Among the models, AutoEncoder supports tabular data and manages medium-sized datasets efficiently. It also handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, which might be beneficial even for low-signal data, minimizing overfitting. Its capability to work with GPUs and short training times caters to potential computational constraints. Despite its weakness with low-signal data, its strengths align better with the dataset requirements compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type provided. It handles medium-sized data well, as it is scalable to large datasets. Although it has some weaknesses with low-signal data, it does not explicitly require high memory, thereby aligning with the low memory requirement. Its short training time also ensures efficiency, making it a balanced choice for tabular data with the dataset constraints provided.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it is well-suited for tabular data and can handle medium-sized datasets with high dimensionality. Although VAE models have high memory requirements, they offer short training times and are scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's need for efficiency given its 'low memory' constraint. The low-signal characteristic of the dataset does not pose a critical challenge for VAE compared to other models, making it the best compromise given the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for the described dataset properties as it supports tabular data, aligns with the 'medium' data size, and is efficient in terms of training time which is helpful given the low memory requirements. It is also capable of handling high dimensional data, a common characteristic in tabular datasets. While VAE has weaknesses with imbalanced data, this is not a specified characteristic of the dataset, making it a viable option given the other constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for the given medium-sized tabular dataset with low signal and low memory requirements. VAE's strengths include handling tabular data and high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Furthermore, it has a short training time and is suitable for datasets not needing high memory, making it the best choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It excels with tabular data, has low memory requirements, can handle sparse and imbalanced data, and offers short training times along with scalability to large datasets. Despite its challenges with noisy data, the primary dataset requirement of low memory usage aligns well with LUNAR's strengths, making it the most appropriate choice given the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected as the most suitable model because it explicitly handles tabular data effectively and is well-suited for low-dimensional datasets, as indicated by the dataset's medium size. Despite being labeled as having a low signal, LUNAR is not specifically weak against this characteristic and offers advantages such as short training time and scalability to large datasets. Additionally, it works well under low-memory constraints, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets, which aligns well with the dataset properties provided. It has strength in handling tabular data and exhibits short training times, addressing the requirement for low memory usage. Despite its poor performance on discrete or categorical data, it doesn't have a specific disadvantage regarding low-signal data, which makes it a viable option for this particular dataset characteristic.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is chosen because it supports tabular data, aligns well with the medium data size, and does not have low memory constraints. Its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and short training time make it appropriate for the dataset characteristics, despite its minor weakness with low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular data and aligns with the dataset requirement for low memory usage. It offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which will efficiently handle the given 'low-signal data'. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced and sparse data, these do not apply strongly to the specified dataset characteristics. VAE's strengths in handling tabular data, short training time, and compatibility with low-signal data make it the optimal choice from the provided list.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it handles tabular data well, which aligns with the dataset type. Despite being low-signal data, VAE's ability to manage high-dimensional data and provide short training time makes it suitable for medium-sized datasets. Although VAE requires high memory, its suitability for tabular data and a good fit for the specifics of this dataset make it the best choice among the options considered.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and offers short training time, which is beneficial for a medium-sized dataset. VAE handles low-signal data without requiring large memory resources significantly better than other options, aligning with the dataset's additional requirement for low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen based on its strengths, which align with the dataset properties, particularly its suitability for tabular data and its ability to handle medium-sized datasets efficiently. Despite the low-signal characteristic, VAE provides good performance on tabular data when the focus is on capturing complex relationships rather than interpretability. Additionally, it supports GPU usage, which can optimize training times and memory usage, catering to the low memory requirement of the dataset. The short training time further aligns with the efficiency needs of this task.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the dataset as it is specifically strong with tabular data, which matches the data type requirement. It also performs well on medium-sized datasets and has strengths in handling sparse and low-dimensional data, which can align with low-signal characteristics. Furthermore, it requires low memory and has a short training time, catering to the dataset's additional requirement of low memory usage. While it is computationally intensive and sensitive to hyperparameters, its benefits outweigh these weaknesses given the dataset's characteristics and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the most suitable due to its strengths in handling tabular data and capacity for low memory consumption, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics, including being medium-sized and requiring low memory usage. Unlike other models, LUNAR does not have listed weaknesses related to low signals, making it a better fit compared to models like AutoEncoder or ALAD, which explicitly list low-signal data as a weakness.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is strong in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Although the dataset is characterized by low-signal data, the key requirements are medium data size and low memory usage. VAE can process medium-sized datasets efficiently and has short training times, which meets the 'low memory' requirement. Additionally, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and its scalability to large datasets provide future-proofing in case the dataset grows.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the data type property of the dataset. Despite the dataset being low-signal and having a requirement for low memory, VAE is the most compatible choice from the list since it supports tabular data, provides short training times, and is scalable to medium datasets. Although VAE generally requires high memory and handles high dimensionality well, it is the more suitable option given the limitations of the other models. It strikes a balance by supporting appropriate data type and scalability, even with the memory consideration.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which is the primary data type in this scenario. It also demonstrates good performance on low-dimensional datasets and is known for short training times and scalability to large datasets, addressing the medium data size and low-memory requirements. Although it has weaknesses concerning noisy data, this is less critical here as the data is characterized as low-signal rather than noisy.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it handles tabular data efficiently, which aligns with the dataset's 'tabular data' tag. Despite its high memory requirement, it provides short training time and can process datasets of medium size effectively. VAE also accommodates noisy data well, allowing it to manage potential noise in the dataset. Other models either suffer from weaknesses related to tabular data or require lower memory usage, which would affect the model's performance given the additional requirement for low memory.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset characteristics mention tabular data and additional requirement for low memory, where LUNAR's strengths align well. It supports tabular data, is scalable to large datasets, and requires short training time which fits a medium dataset size. Although it has a high memory weakness, its strengths in handling low-dimensional and sparse data make it the most suitable option considering no other model perfectly aligns with all dataset requirements. Additionally, LUNAR's ability to handle imbalanced data, which is not explicitly required but still beneficial, further complements the choice in the presence of low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low signal and a requirement for low memory usage. LUNAR is suited for tabular data and should perform adequately with low-dimensional datasets. It has strengths in handling tabular and sparse data while providing a manageable training time and scalability to larger datasets, which is important for a medium-sized dataset. Although it has weaknesses in handling high memory requirements, it has an advantage in prioritizing tabular data and fast training time, which makes it a better fit compared to others that either require high memory or have significant weaknesses for low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is best suited for the given dataset properties as it excels with tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It supports imbalanced data and works well with low memory, addressing additional data characteristics and requirements. LUNAR also accommodates sparse data and has a short training time, making it efficient and scalable for medium-sized datasets. Although it is weak with noisy data, the dataset's primary concern appears to be low signal strength, which LUNAR is suited to handle.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: optdigits\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"large\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"high dimensionality\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\", \"high memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and characterized by high dimensionality, all of which align well with AutoEncoder's strengths. AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets and efficient with high-memory requirements, addressing the dataset's CPU and high-memory tags. It also excels in handling high-dimensional tabular data, making it a suitable choice for this task. While some models like VAE and ALAD also perform well with high-dimensional tabular data, AutoEncoder's strengths in scalability, training time, and adaptability to large datasets make it the best fit.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which match the dataset characteristics. Additionally, AE1SVM is scalable to large datasets and supports high memory usage, aligning with the dataset requirements. While it has weaknesses in CPU usage, the dataset's attributes such as high dimensionality and large size are crucial factors where AE1SVM excels compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, high-dimensional, tabular data with high memory requirements. AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and high-dimensional datasets, supports GPU for enhanced performance, can handle large datasets efficiently, and is adept at dealing with noisy data. It also has short training times, which is advantageous for high memory requirements. Although it does not support CPU as a strength, it addresses most other key dataset needs better than alternative models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset properties as it handles tabular data and high dimensionality well, which match the dataset tags. AE1SVM also supports large datasets, while accommodating high memory requirements and offers a short training time, aligning with the additional CPU and high memory constraints. Although GPU is a strength, the model's ability to handle high memory demands and high dimensionality in tabular data make it a suitable choice compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and high-dimensional, requiring a model capable of handling such characteristics. The AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and high-dimensionality, offers scalability to large datasets, and can manage noisy data effectively. Additionally, it benefits from short training times. While it is designed to utilize GPUs, the high memory attribute aligns with the dataset's requirement. Despite having weaknesses in CPU usage, high memory requirements are met with the dataset's memory capability, making it the best fit among the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, with high dimensionality, and has a requirement for high memory. The AutoEncoder is a model that is well-suited for high dimensionality and tabular data. It performs well with large datasets and can handle noisy data while being scalable, which matches the dataset properties closely. While it may require a GPU for optimal performance due to high memory usage, it doesn't have significant weaknesses that misalign with the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice as it effectively handles tabular data and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also scalable to large datasets and runs efficiently on high memory environments, addressing the dataset's large size and high-memory requirements. Additionally, it offers a short training time, making it practical for efficient processing, and it can manage noisy data, aligning well with the dataset's potential noise challenges.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and characterized by high dimensionality. AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and high-dimensional datasets. It can efficiently handle large datasets, has a short training time, and is capable of working with noise, which matches the characteristics of the given dataset. Although the model's use of GPU might be a limitation given the CPU requirement, its high memory compatibility and scalability to large datasets make it the most suitable choice from the list.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the best choice because it is well-suited for high dimensionality and large tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It can handle noisy data efficiently and uses high memory, which fits the dataset's additional requirements. VAE also offers a short training time and scalability for large datasets, which are important given the dataset's large size.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. It supports large datasets, is scalable, and benefits from high memory availability. Its ability to handle noisy data while utilizing GPU accelerations makes it a good fit for this scenario. Additionally, it offers short training times, which is beneficial when using CPU resources, even though CPUs are generally not its primary strength.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is best suited for the given dataset properties due to its strengths - handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets, while also being effective with tabular data. It aligns well with additional requirements for high memory usage. Despite certain weaknesses (e.g., some issues on CPU), its short training time and applicability to a wide domain of fields make it a strong fit for this large, high-dimensional tabular dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it is strong in handling high dimensionality, sparse and imbalanced data, which aligns with the dataset's high dimensionality tag. It is also capable of dealing with tabular data and scalable to large datasets. Additionally, AE1SVM requires high memory, which matches the dataset's requirement for high memory. While it typically utilizes GPU, it is governed by the requirement of using CPU, which does present a slight misalignment but is offset by its overall strengths with the data type and characteristics. The model's short training time is another beneficial attribute for handling large datasets efficiently.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the dataset properties, which include large tabular datasets with high dimensionality that require high memory and processing on a CPU. The AutoEncoder's strengths in handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets, along with its suitability for tabular data and ability to use high memory, make it the best choice among the models. Additionally, it offers a short training time, which is advantageous given the high dimensionality of the data.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is particularly well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, as it can handle high memory demands and is scalable to large datasets. It is also capable of handling noisy data efficiently. Despite the requirement for high memory, which is supported by the dataset requirements, the model's strength in high dimensionality and scalability makes it a strong candidate given the dataset characteristics, especially when run on a GPU. Other options either do not support tabular data well or have more significant weaknesses related to scalability or high memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is suitable for this large, high-dimensional tabular dataset as it handles high dimensionality well, supports tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets. It also aligns with the additional CPU and high memory requirements of the dataset. Despite its weakness of longer training times with CPU, its strengths far outweigh this, making it the best choice given the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AE1SVM model is well-suited for handling high dimensionality and tabular data, both of which are characteristics of the dataset. It also supports high memory usage and can scale to large datasets, making it compatible with the 'large' data size tag. Despite the need for a CPU, AE1SVM stands out due to its strengths in dealing with the dataset's properties and requirements, particularly for tabular high-dimensional data and scalability.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It also handles large datasets effectively and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it has a weakness in terms of CPU use, it compensates with its strengths in handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the dataset because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which aligns with our dataset properties. It is capable of scaling to large datasets and operates with high memory, meeting the CPU and high memory requirements of the dataset. Additionally, its strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data make it well-suited, and it offers short training times, allowing for efficient computation on large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, consists of tabular and high-dimensional data, and requires high memory with the ability to utilize a CPU. AutoEncoder supports high dimensionality and tabular data, is scalable to large datasets, offers high memory usage, and has short training times. Although primarily uses GPU, the capability for utilizing high memory aligns well with the CPU requirement. Its strengths outweigh its weaknesses in this context, making it the most suitable model for the given dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also excels with large datasets, is suitable for high dimensionality, and can handle noisy data effectively. The model's capability to operate with high memory and short training time aligns well with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it typically utilizes a GPU for best performance, its scalability to large datasets makes it a strong candidate given the constraints. While it has weak support for CPU, its strengths outweigh this limitation for the given scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset as it handles large tabular data efficiently, which is tagged with high dimensionality. It has the strengths of dealing with noisy data and scalability to large datasets, utilizing high memory and GPU efficiently, satisfying the dataset requirements. While it has a weakness of not performing well on datasets requiring CPU, in this scenario, other critical strengths like handling large, high-dimensional, tabular data outweigh this weakness, making it the best choice among the listed models.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is suitable for this large, high-dimensional tabular dataset. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, and it is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it can handle noisy data and is compatible with high memory requirements, making it the best choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model due to its strengths aligning well with the dataset properties. It handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It also offers scalability for large datasets with high memory requirements, compatible with the CPU setting. Despite the CPU being a noted weakness, AE1SVM's overall alignment with the dataset's characteristics makes it the preferable choice over models with more pronounced weaknesses in tabular data processing or scalability.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data well, both of which are key properties of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and requires high memory, aligning with the CPU and high-memory requirements of the dataset. While it has a weakness for CPU usage, this weakness is shared with most models, and its strengths in critical areas make it the best fit overall.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it handles tabular data and high dimensionality well, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets and performs well on high-memory systems. Additionally, it has a short training time, making it efficient given the computational constraints, despite its weakness in handling CPU which is less critical given its other strengths align with the dataset's needs.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality, with requirements for high memory. AutoEncoder is well-suited for handling high-dimensional tabular data, scalable to large datasets, and is compatible with high memory usage on GPU. Additionally, it can handle noisy data and has a short training time, making it an optimal choice considering our dataset's properties and computational constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model as it handles high-dimensional tabular data effectively, offers scalability to large datasets, and can operate with high memory, which matches the dataset's large size and requirement for high memory usage. It is optimized for short training times on GPUs, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirements. While it primarily uses GPU resources, it covers key strengths like handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which are vital for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it handles tabular data effectively, supports high dimensionality, and is capable of scaling to large datasets. Additionally, it can manage noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. While the dataset requires high memory and relies on CPUs, the strengths of AutoEncoder in handling large, high-dimensional tabular data outweigh these weaknesses, making it the most fitting choice from the list provided.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality. It handles high memory requirements efficiently and offers scalability to large datasets. Furthermore, it supports noise tolerance, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. While it is designed for GPU, the CPU requirement of the dataset is not a major hindrance when compared to other models with more significant mismatches in weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets and leverages the strengths of handling high-dimensional data with noisy elements. It is scalable to large datasets and can utilize GPUs for efficient processing, which aligns with the dataset properties. Furthermore, its capability to accommodate high memory demands is crucial given the dataset's high dimensionality and the additional requirement of high memory. While it has weaknesses with small data sizes and CPU usage, these are not issues here, making it the most suitable choice from the list.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model as it aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which match the dataset properties. Additionally, AutoEncoder has the ability to work with large datasets and high memory requirements, both of which are crucial given the dataset's size and constraints. Despite requiring a GPU for optimal performance, its short training time and scalability make it appropriate for the dataset's needs.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is suitable for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. It supports tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, matching the dataset's size and need for high memory support. Additionally, it handles noisy and sparse data well, which are common challenges in high-dimensional datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a large-scale tabular dataset with high dimensionality and high memory requirements, which aligns well with the strengths of the AutoEncoder model. AutoEncoders are well-suited for dealing with high-dimensional and tabular data, can handle noisy data, and are scalable to large datasets. Additionally, AutoEncoders have high memory capabilities and short training times, meeting the requirements specified in the dataset properties. Although AutoEncoders prefer GPU implementation, their high memory compatibility makes them suitable for the provided CPU requirement, considering the alternatives.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is well-suited for high-dimensional, large tabular datasets, as indicated by its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and scalability to large datasets. It leverages GPU and high memory effectively, which matches the dataset requirement, while having strengths relevant to this domain. Despite a longer training time on CPU, its scalability and handling of noisy and sparse data make it appropriate for the given dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality with high memory requirements. AutoEncoder is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data and is scalable to large datasets. It also handles noisy data and leverages GPU and high memory efficiently, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite requiring a CPU, its overall strengths make it the most suitable choice given the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the best choice for the given dataset because it excels in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset's properties. It supports high memory requirements and has a short training time, which fits the additional dataset requirements. While it has a weakness of requiring a GPU, this is mitigated by the dataset's high memory requirement, which can complement GPU usage. AE1SVM stands out among other models for meeting these specific needs.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is the most suitable model as it handles tabular data well, which matches the dataset type. It is also capable of dealing with high dimensionality, a key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, ALAD is scalable to large datasets, a crucial factor given the data size. Although it is more oriented towards GPU, the high memory aspect aligns well with the dataset's additional requirements. While it does have a weakness in terms of CPU, its strengths make it the best fit for the given dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable for large tabular data with high dimensionality and requires high memory, which matches the dataset characteristics. Its strengths include handling noisy data and scalability to large datasets, which is important given the dataset's size and complexity. It also offers short training time, which is beneficial given the high dimensionality. Despite the weakness of requiring a GPU, it remains the most compatible option among the listed models considering the dataset's demand for CPU and high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the best choice for this dataset because it handles tabular data and high dimensionality effectively, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, AutoEncoder supports large datasets, has high memory requirements, and can be efficiently trained on a GPU, matching the dataset's needs for a model that can manage large data sizes with high memory. Its weaknesses, such as the need for a GPU instead of CPU, align well with the additional requirements specified in the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AE1SVM model is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and its applicability to tabular data. It is also scalable to large datasets and operates effectively with high memory, which aligns perfectly with the dataset's tags. Although it requires a GPU, it avoids the weaknesses associated with CPU dependency observed in other models. Furthermore, its ability to perform well on high-dimensional tabular data makes it a strong contender in this scenario, despite not being explicitly tuned for noisy data.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data with high dimensionality, aligns well with the large data size, and is scalable to large datasets. It also has a strength in handling high memory requirements, which fits the dataset's additional requirements. Despite its CPU weakness, its strengths outweigh other models with regards to the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is a suitable choice for this dataset because it handles high dimensionality effectively and works well with tabular data. It also supports large datasets and high memory, aligning with the dataset properties. It offers scalability and short training time, which are important given the large data size and computational resources available. While it requires a GPU and does not perform well with CPU, the dataset specifies high memory, which aligns with the strengths of AutoEncoder.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is selected because it specifically excels in dealing with tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches well with the dataset's characteristics. It also supports large datasets, aligns with the high memory requirement, and is scalable. While it requires GPU for optimal performance and has a long training time, it is well-suited for the dataset's large size and complexity, leveraging its strengths such as handling noisy and sparse data effectively in a tabular domain.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is chosen because it effectively handles tabular data and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It supports large datasets and requires high memory, aligning well with the dataset's CPU and high memory requirements. While AE1SVM is optimized for GPU, it still possesses the necessary strengths for handling tabular data with high dimensionality, ensuring scalability to large datasets while maintaining short training time.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it handles high dimensional tabular data effectively, offers high memory utilization, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics provided. Although AE1SVM has a weakness of long training times with CPU, it supports GPU, which can mitigate this issue. Its strength in handling both tabular data and high dimensionality makes it a better fit compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is a fitting choice for the dataset due to its strengths in handling large, high-dimensional tabular data. It is scalable to large datasets, supports GPU acceleration for high-memory environments, and typically involves a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's CPU and high-memory requirements. While it has weaknesses with real-time data and imbalanced datasets, these are not specified concerns for this scenario, making it a suitable choice given the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality, which aligns well with the strengths of AutoEncoder. AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data and high-dimensional datasets, supports noisy data, and scales well to large datasets, which matches the dataset requirements. Despite needing a GPU for optimal performance, its capability with high memory and short training time accommodate the dataset's additional needs. Its weaknesses related to CPU dependency and imbalanced data are not major concerns given the current dataset description.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: ALAD\n", + "Reason to choose this model: ALAD is well-suited for the dataset given its effective handling of tabular data and high dimensionality, which matches the specified dataset characteristics. It is capable of working with large datasets, and although it is not optimized for CPU, its strength in GPU environments and ability to handle high memory requirements align with the dataset's additional needs. Despite the longer training time, ALAD offers scalability to large datasets, making it a good fit overall.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is the most suitable choice because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. It supports large datasets and performs well with high memory constraints, which is important given the dataset size and additional CPU requirement. Additionally, AE1SVM has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset's needs. While AE1SVM's GPU preference is a slight mismatch with the CPU tag, its overall strengths far outweigh this single discrepancy compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected because it is suited for high-dimensional tabular data, can handle noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics provided. Additionally, AutoEncoder is compatible with high memory requirements and offers short training time, making it a good match even when CPU resources are specified. Despite the CPU weakness, the suitability for tabular data and high dimensionality makes it the best choice given the dataset properties.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: satellite\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"low-signal data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable because it supports tabular data, aligns with the medium-sized dataset, and operates efficiently with noisy data, which is pertinent given the low-signal data characteristic. It also offers short training time, which can satisfy the low memory requirement to some extent, compared to other models that have memory constraints. Additionally, while VAE's weaknesses include handling discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these aspects are not specified as issues in the dataset tags. Thus, VAE is the best match from the given options.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets and supports low memory applications, aligning with the dataset's properties. While it doesn't specialize in low-signal data, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and short training time make it a balanced choice given the constraints and requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it supports tabular data and can handle low-signal data effectively while requiring minimal memory usage, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It also supports medium-sized datasets with high dimensionality and operates with a short training time. Additionally, VAE is known for its scalability to medium datasets, making it suitable for the task at hand.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for tabular data and operates efficiently on medium-sized datasets, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Despite having a higher memory requirement, VAE supports short training times, manages high-dimensional data, and is suitable for low-signal data since the dataset does not emphasize the need for strong signal extraction. It also offers scalability for larger datasets if needed in the future.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model has strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It is suitable for medium-sized data and has a short training time, which complements the dataset's low memory requirement. Although it has some weaknesses with imbalanced data and low-signal data, its overall compatibility with tabular data and efficiency in processing makes it the most suitable choice among the available models given the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable choice because it is capable of handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's type. Additionally, it is equipped to deal with low-memory environments by offering short training times and is effective with medium-sized datasets, which fits the dataset's size. Although VAE has some weaknesses with imbalanced data, the dataset's primary characteristics align well with VAE's strengths, making it the best fit among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data with high dimensionality and short training times. Despite its higher memory usage, it aligns well with the medium data size requirement and handles tabular data effectively. Although it does not excel with low-signal data, it is the most suitable given the model list constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also designed for low-dimensional datasets, aligning with the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset. Importantly, LUNAR has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it more memory-efficient compared to others. Despite its weakness of being computationally intensive, it poses fewer memory constraints, which is a critical requirement for this data task.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable option for the given dataset because it supports tabular data and has a short training time, which matches the dataset requirement for handling low memory footprints efficiently. Despite the low-signal data tag, VAE's compatibility with tabular data and its strength in efficiently handling medium-sized datasets makes it a viable candidate, especially when low memory usage is necessary. Moreover, VAE can handle noisy data, which is common in low-signal datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low memory requirements and low-signal characteristics. LUNAR is highlighted for its suitability for tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, short training times, and its ability to scale to large datasets. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data and high memory usage, it does not have specific weaknesses related to low memory or low-signal data, making it a better choice compared to other models with significant weaknesses in these areas.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also suitable for medium data sizes as it is scalable to large datasets with a short training time. Despite its need for high memory, it can handle the low-signal characteristic of the dataset more effectively than other models, which either do not support tabular data or have specific weaknesses such as handling low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice due to its strengths in handling tabular data, short training time, and scalability to large datasets, which align well with the dataset properties. Despite its potential issues with noisy data and high memory, LUNAR's key advantages such as efficient processing of low-signal data outweigh these concerns, especially given the low memory requirement and the medium dataset size.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low signal and requires low memory usage. AutoEncoder supports tabular data and offers short training time, which is beneficial for medium-sized datasets. Moreover, AutoEncoder's ability to handle tabular data and its support for noisy data aligns well with the dataset characteristics. While it does not explicitly list low memory as a strength, it is more aligned with the dataset properties than other models. Despite its weakness in handling low-signal data, it handles medium-sized datasets better than other models that require high memory or longer training times.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected as it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Additionally, it is effective with short training time requirements and can handle medium-sized datasets, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. While VAE has high memory usage as a weakness, the model's strength in handling tabular data and dealing with potentially noisy data makes it the best fit compared to other models. Models like AE1SVM and AutoEncoder have issues with small data size and require high memory or have weaknesses in low-signal data, making VAE a balanced choice given the dataset requirements and characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular datasets with low memory constraints. Its strengths align with the dataset properties, particularly its ability to handle tabular data effectively while maintaining a short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is ideal for medium-sized data. While it has a weakness with discrete or categorical data, this is not a specified concern for the dataset provided. Overall, VAE's advantages outweigh its weaknesses in this context, making it a suitable match for the given requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it works well with medium-sized tabular data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset in question. Although it is not specifically designed for low-signal data, it has strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensional datasets while maintaining efficiency with a short training time and scalability. While the dataset requires low memory usage, which is a weakness for AutoEncoders, the absence of model options that meet all criteria makes this the most suitable choice given the strengths aligned with the dataset's structure and the additional qualities that could counterbalance the low-signal challenges.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular data and does not have low memory as a weakness, making it a good option given the requirement for low memory usage and the low-signal nature of the data. Although VAE has a weakness with discrete or categorical data, this is not the main concern given the dataset characteristics. Other models either have weaknesses directly related to tabular data or low memory, which are more crucial given the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a suitable choice for the dataset characterized by medium-sized tabular data with low signal, while also needing to be efficient in low memory environments. VAE's strengths include handling tabular data effectively and working efficiently with noisy data, all of which align well with the dataset's requirements. Despite its weakness in low-signal data, it comparatively fits the given requirements better than other models in terms of balancing scalability and resource efficiency.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is chosen because it supports tabular data and can handle medium-sized datasets effectively. While it does have high memory requirements, it also offers a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it suitable given the low memory constraint. VAE's weakness in dealing with discrete or categorical data is not directly in conflict with the dataset properties, and its strengths in managing tabular and noisy data make it a well-rounded choice for low-signal, medium-sized data.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Despite being a medium-sized dataset, VAE can manage the dataset effectively given its scalability to large datasets and short training time. While low-signal data is a characteristic in the dataset, the model's ability to handle high dimensionality and noisy data provides potential value extraction. Although VAE has higher memory usage as a weakness, its strengths in handling tabular data and scalability make it the most fitting choice among the given models.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it handles tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset type. It is suitable for medium-sized datasets and is optimized for using a GPU, which can help with the constraints of low memory. While it has a weakness in handling discrete or categorical data, the dataset characteristics of 'low-signal data' could still benefit from its ability to work with high-dimensional data and noisy data. Other models either have substantial weaknesses in dealing with tabular data or exhibit not being optimized for short training time or efficient memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is best suited for the given dataset as it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Despite having high memory requirements, it handles medium-sized datasets effectively with a short training time. It also possesses strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data, although the dataset is characterized by low signal, which isn't directly a strong point of VAE, other models in the list are less suitable due to more significant mismatches with the dataset characteristics, such as not supporting tabular data or requiring high memory without other matching strengths.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for the dataset properties, as it handles tabular data effectively. It provides strengths in high dimensionality and performs well on medium-sized datasets. Additionally, it offers short training times and operates well with GPU, aligning closely with the dataset requirements. Although it requires high memory, which is a slight mismatch, it compensates with its applicability to tabular data and medium dataset size, making it a better fit compared to other models with significant weaknesses regarding tabular data or low-memory concerns.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable as it supports tabular data, which aligns well with the dataset type. Additionally, the VAE model has a strength in dealing with high dimensionality, short training time, and scalability to large datasets. Although VAE might suffer with discrete or categorical data, it is designed to handle noisy data, which can be beneficial for low-signal data where the signal is difficult to discern. Other models have critical weaknesses such as high memory (DevNet) or low-signal data incompatibility (ALAD), making VAE a better fit given the medium-sized dataset and the low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is the best choice for this dataset because it has strengths in handling tabular data along with high dimensionality, which is suitable for the given dataset properties. It also supports GPU, has a short training time, and is scalable to large datasets, which is beneficial given the medium data size and low memory requirement. Although it does not specialize in low-signal data, its advantages in other relevant aspects make it the most suitable model among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and can handle low-dimensional, unstructured feature datasets, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It is also able to manage imbalanced and sparse data, and offers the benefit of short training times and scalability to large datasets. Although it may be computationally intensive, it does not have a specific weakness for low memory, making it feasible given the dataset's requirements for low signal data and low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular data with low signal and low memory requirements. It has strengths in handling tabular data, operates efficiently on GPU for high-dimensional datasets, and maintains a short training time, which counters the low-signal characteristic. While it has weaknesses with categorical data and imbalanced data, these are not primary concerns given the dataset properties. Compared to other models, VAE best fits the dataset's needs without major drawbacks based on the given characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is suitable for medium-sized tabular data and works well with low memory constraints, given its short training time and scalability. It is specifically strong with tabular data, high dimensionality, and supports GPU acceleration, which fits the characteristics of the dataset. Although AutoEncoder has a weakness for low-signal data, its strengths align well with the dataset properties, making it the best choice among the listed models.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for medium-sized tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is efficient in handling tabular data, which is explicitly indicated as a strength. Despite requiring high memory, which contrasts with the dataset's low memory constraint, VAE has a short training time and can accommodate low-signal data better than other models, as its weaknesses do not explicitly list low-signal data as a limitation. This makes VAE the best fit among the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is tabular with a medium data size and low-signal characteristics, requiring low memory usage. VAE is strong with tabular data and capable of handling high dimensionality and noisy data, although it generally requires high memory. However, other model options either have significant weaknesses with tabular or low-signal data, or do not meet the low memory requirement, making VAE a better fit compared to the alternatives even with this trade-off on memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is characterized by medium-sized tabular data with low-signal and low memory requirements. Among the models, VAE supports tabular data well, offers short training times, and can handle medium-sized datasets. Additionally, it doesn't have significant memory constraints. While VAE may not excel in low-signal scenarios, its ability to work with tabular data and medium-sized datasets makes it the best option among the given models, as others have more debilitating weaknesses for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model based on the dataset properties. The dataset is tabular with medium size and low memory requirements. Although the dataset is characterized by low signal data, LUNAR's strength in handling tabular data and its capability to work with sparse data and short training time make it a good fit. While it is sensitive to hyperparameters and can be computationally intensive, it does not have issues with low memory and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the provided requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data and is efficient with medium-sized datasets, a short training time, and can handle noisy data. While it is less suitable for low-signal data, it meets other dataset constraints such as tabular format and medium size better than the alternatives, thus offering a balanced choice in line with the given data characteristics and additional requirement of low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, fits within the constraints of medium-sized datasets with low memory usage, and does not have weaknesses directly impeding its performance on low-signal datasets. VAE's short training time and ability to handle high dimensionality make it a robust choice. Other models like DevNet and AutoEncoder, despite handling tabular and low memory well, have weaknesses such as low-signal data in the case of AutoEncoder, making VAE more optimal under the given constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it is designed to handle tabular data effectively. It also offers a short training time, which is beneficial given the medium data size. Although it requires high memory, which contradicts the low memory requirement, it is the least conflicting option available since it performs well on tabular data and can manage low-signal data to some degree. Other models either have a strong weakness against low-signal data or tabular data, making VAE the best compromise given the circumstances.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data and allows for high dimensionality, which fits well with the dataset's tags. It handles noisy data efficiently, has a short training time, and can work with low-memory resources. Although it has a weakness with discrete or categorical data, that is the least impact compared to the low-signal nature of the dataset which VAE does not explicitly address. Given the requirement for low memory and preference for models on tabular data, VAE's strengths align closely with the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It also provides scalability to large datasets and has short training times, fitting the requirement for a medium-sized dataset with low memory constraints. Additionally, LUNAR excels with imbalanced and sparse data, which might be beneficial given the dataset's low-signal characteristics. While it is computationally intensive and sensitive to hyperparameters, its strengths outweigh these factors for the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is a suitable choice for this medium-sized tabular dataset with low-signal characteristics. It can handle tabular data effectively and has a short training time, which is beneficial for datasets with low memory requirements. Although AutoEncoders have a weakness with low-signal data, the other models have more severe compatibility issues with either tabular data, low signal, or memory constraints. AutoEncoder's strengths in tabular data processing and scalability make it the most balanced option here, despite its weakness in low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Considering the dataset properties of medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics and the additional requirement for low memory usage, VAE is the most suitable choice. VAE is strong in handling tabular data and works efficiently with high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's low-signal data characteristic. Despite the low memory requirements, VAE generally has a short training time which can help mitigate the memory concerns. Although it is not explicitly listed as low memory, its efficiency in training can be advantageous compared to other models that are explicitly high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is characterized as 'medium' in size and 'tabular', with a need for 'low memory'. While the dataset is 'low-signal', the primary requirement is a model that supports tabular data efficiently with low memory usage. VAE has strengths in handling tabular data and works well with medium-sized datasets. Although it typically requires high memory, it can handle the low-signal characteristics of the dataset better than other options. The other models either are not suited for tabular data, have memory constraints, or do not handle low-signal data well.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular in type, and characterized by low-signal data, with an additional requirement of low memory. Among the models listed, VAE supports tabular data and is efficient for medium-sized datasets. Although it may not inherently cater to low-signal data, VAE handles tabular data well and has a short training time. While it requires high memory, it meets more of the dataset's criteria than the other models, which either don't support tabular data as strongly or have weaknesses that do not align well with the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's type. It has a short training time, making it suitable for medium-sized datasets, and it can handle datasets with high dimensionality, which might be relevant given the 'low-signal data' characteristic. Additionally, VAE is listed to be effective with low memory requirements, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirement of 'low memory'. It is more suitable compared to other models, as none of the weaknesses directly impact the dataset's provided characteristics. The only potential concern is its ineffectiveness with imbalanced data, but this is outweighed by its other strengths.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics, and there is an additional requirement for low memory usage. Among the options provided, VAE supports tabular data processing and is efficient with medium-sized datasets due to short training times and scalability to large datasets. Despite the requirements for high memory, which isn't ideal for low memory constraints, VAE's ability to handle noisy data and tabular data makes it the most suitable among available options given the constraints provided. Other models either have significant weaknesses dealing with tabular data, low-signal constraints, or small datasets, making VAE the best fit although some trade-offs exist.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It explicitly supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type, and it is also designed to handle low-signal data effectively which is critical given the dataset characteristics. Furthermore, LUNAR operates efficiently with low memory and provides short training times, addressing the additional requirements of the dataset. Despite LUNAR's computational intensity and hyperparameter sensitivity, these factors are less critical compared to the match in dataset characteristics and requirements. Other models either have weaknesses directly affecting the dataset's low memory requirement or do not align as well with the given dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset properties indicate a medium-sized tabular dataset with low-signal data and a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is well-suited for tabular data and offers short training times, making it efficient for medium data sizes. While it is not specifically optimized for low memory, it strikes a good balance with its strengths in efficient handling of tabular datasets and compatibility with high-dimensional data. Moreover, it benefits from GPU acceleration, which can offset some memory constraints. Other models either have critical weaknesses with low-signal data (e.g., DevNet, ALAD, AutoEncoder) or do not align well with the specified tabular data type or low memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized and consists of tabular data with low signal, requiring a model that can handle tabular data, is efficient in terms of memory, and offers a short training time. The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, has a short training time, and performs well on medium-sized datasets despite low-signal properties. Although it has high memory requirements, the strengths of handling tabular data and short training durations make it a more suited candidate compared to others on the list.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. While it has high memory usage as a weakness, it excels in handling tabular data and has short training times, making it a suitable choice for a medium-sized dataset. Although it is not specifically strong in dealing with low-signal data, among the options, it best aligns with the dataset's needs without a strong conflict with its weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset properties. It is optimized for scenarios with sparse and imbalanced data and performs well with low-dimensional datasets, which might be relevant for low-signal data. Moreover, LUNAR is efficient with short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which addresses the medium data size without a high memory footprint, as required. Other models either have weaknesses with low-signal data or require more memory than available.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data, which aligns with the dataset properties. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, it supports tabular data effectively with strengths in short training time and high dimensionality. It also has low memory requirements compared to other models, making it a suitable choice for your constraints in low memory and low-signal data handling.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. It has strengths like short training time and compatibility with high-dimensionality datasets, which are useful given the medium data size requirement. Despite having a weakness with discrete or categorical data, VAE's ability to handle noisy data and be scalable to large datasets makes it a suitable choice for low-signal datasets. The requirement for low memory is a concern, but among the available options, VAE has fewer conflicting weaknesses compared to other models.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: lympho\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"small\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is best suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and its low-memory requirement, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also benefits from short training times and is scalable to large datasets, making it efficient despite the dataset being small in size. Although more memory-intensive models like AE1SVM, ALAD, and AutoEncoder are viable for tabular data, LUNAR is better suited for scenarios where low memory usage is critical.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. It is also suitable for small dataset sizes, as there is no explicit weakness listed for small datasets. Moreover, it has low memory requirements, as its high memory is listed as a weakness, and has a short training time, making it a suitable fit given the 'low memory' additional requirement outlined in the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a suitable choice as it supports tabular data, which matches our dataset type. It is efficient with small data sizes due to its short training time and is capable of operating in environments with limited memory. While it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and may not be ideal for highly imbalanced datasets, these do not outweigh its capabilities with tabular data in the provided context.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. Despite requiring high memory, it is suitable due to its strengths in handling tabular data and providing short training time, making it efficient for small datasets. While other models have weaknesses such as poor performance on small datasets or lack of support for tabular data, VAE balances its capabilities well given the constraints, making it the most suitable choice among the options provided.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is capable of handling tabular data effectively, which is the type of dataset we have. Although it generally requires high memory, it has a short training time, which is beneficial for a small dataset. While it does have weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these weaknesses were less relevant compared to other models in the list, especially since the dataset size is small and there's a need for low memory usage. Furthermore, VAE's compatibility with high dimensionality and noisy data aligns well with potential data characteristics that are often encountered in various domains.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is suitable because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, and while this is a small dataset, the low memory requirement fits, as LUNAR doesn't have specific weaknesses related to small data size or low memory environments. Its weaknesses like high memory and hyperparameter sensitivity aren't critical in this scenario, as the dataset is small.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small, tabular, and requires low memory usage. While VAE does have some high memory requirements, among the field, it is one of the few models with strong support for tabular data which is critical for this task. Additionally, it excels in handling high dimensional data and noisy data, should these characteristics become relevant. Also, VAE provides a short training time which is suitable given the small data size. Other models in the list either struggle with small datasets or tabular data, making VAE the balanced choice despite its limitation on memory.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is best suited for tabular data and is characterized by its ability to handle low-dimensional datasets. While it may require careful tuning due to hyperparameter sensitivity, it offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Notably, it does not have small data size as a weakness, making it a suitable choice for a small dataset with low memory requirements. This contrasts with most other models which list small data size or low memory as weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular data and small datasets, which fits the dataset properties identified. While it has some weaknesses with high memory, it offers low memory requirements compared to other models in the list due to its design for low-dimensional datasets, and provides short training times, making it an optimal choice given the additional requirement for low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, and its ability to work well with sparse and imbalanced data. Additionally, it is designed for low memory usage and has a short training time, which aligns well with the dataset’s characteristics of being small and having low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it specifically lists 'tabular data' as a strength, which aligns with the dataset's data type. Despite requiring high memory, other options are either explicitly weak for small datasets or tabular data, or do not emphasize the needed strengths. VAE also has a short training time, which is advantageous for a small dataset requiring low memory usage, balancing more favorable characteristics applicable to the dataset needs.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Based on the dataset properties of small size, tabular data, and additional requirement of low memory, LUNAR is a suitable choice because it supports tabular data, performs well with low-dimensional datasets, and has short training times. While it is marked as potentially high memory, its lack of reliance on other characteristics not present in the data (e.g., images, time series) makes it a more suitable choice compared to models like AutoEncoder, which would be constrained by small data size limitations.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data and has short training time, which aligns with the dataset requirement of low memory usage. Although it's typically suitable for larger datasets, none of the weaknesses directly conflict with the dataset properties. Other models are less suitable due to specific weaknesses associated with small data size and low memory, which are not applicable to VAE in this context.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is capable of handling low-dimensional and sparse datasets and offers short training times, meeting the requirement for low memory usage. Although LUNAR has some weaknesses like high memory usage and hyperparameter sensitivity, it still aligns better with the dataset characteristics compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it specifically supports tabular data and small data size is not mentioned as a weakness. Additionally, LUNAR has strengths in low-dimensional datasets, short training time, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset tag of requiring low memory. This makes LUNAR more suitable compared to other options that have small data size or low memory as weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice as it supports tabular data effectively and is optimized for low-dimensional datasets, which fits the 'small' data size requirement. It also operates with low memory usage, meeting the 'low memory' constraint, and has a short training time, making it efficient to deploy. Although it has some weaknesses like high memory demand and hyperparameter sensitivity, these are less impacting than those of the other models given the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small and tabular, requiring low memory usage. LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, can handle sparse and imbalanced datasets, and promises short training time with scalability to larger datasets. It is not strongly affected by the weaknesses that impact other models concerning small data sizes, making it the most suitable choice given the dataset's needs for low memory consumption and small data adaptability.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small, tabular, and requires low memory usage. VAE supports tabular data and has a short training time, making it suitable for small data contexts. Although VAE has a weakness with discrete/categorical data, this is offset by its strength in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, thus potentially providing robust performance despite dataset limitations.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice as it supports tabular data with a small dataset size requirement and low memory usage, given its short training time and efficiency in handling sparse data. Even though it requires careful hyperparameter tuning, it meets the data size, type, and additional requirements indicated by the dataset tags better than other models which have weaknesses such as high memory consumption or inadequate performance on small datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small, consists of tabular data, and has a requirement for low memory usage. While VAE typically requires high memory, it does not have the explicit 'small data size' weakness as many others in the list do, making it a more suitable option. It is also explicitly strong with tabular data, unlike most other models in the list that are either weak with small datasets or require high memory, which does not meet the dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it has strengths in dealing with tabular data and low-dimensional datasets. It is capable of handling sparse and imbalanced data, which aligns with potential characteristics implied by the additional requirement of low memory. Moreover, LUNAR has short training times and is scalable to large datasets, ensuring efficient processing with the constraints of a small data size. Despite weaknesses in regions like images and high memory usage, it aligns closely with the dataset properties compared to other models that are not optimized for small data size and have memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a suitable choice for a small, tabular dataset with low memory requirements. It has the strength of handling tabular data and although it generally requires high memory, its support for GPU and short training time can compensate for the low memory constraint better than other options. The weaknesses of VAE don't significantly impact the small, low-memory, tabular dataset context.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it handles tabular data well and is suited for high-dimensionality data. Additionally, it supports short training times, which is beneficial for a small dataset. Although it requires high memory, which is a requirement, it delivers good performance for tabular data in small volumes compared to other models with more significant weaknesses related to small data size or low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the best choice for this dataset as it specifically supports 'tabular data' and 'low-dimensional datasets,' which aligns with the dataset properties. Although it requires high memory, the dataset's need for 'low memory' is not as critical because the other models in the list have more significant weaknesses related to small data size and poor performance on tabular data. Furthermore, LUNAR offers a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which ensures quick deployment and extension if the dataset grows.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model supports tabular data, which is suitable for this dataset. While it requires high memory and is scalable to large datasets, the short training time is beneficial for small datasets. Although it is not ideal for discrete or categorical data, it manages other data characteristics well. Despite its strengths in high memory usage, it doesn't have low memory in its weaknesses for small data sizes, making it a viable option given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset because it supports tabular data, which is the type of data we have. It can handle a small data size, as our dataset is described to be small, and it operates well under low memory settings despite its need for high memory typically. Additionally, it has short training times which is beneficial for efficiency. While it may not inherently solve the low memory constraint, among the options available, it offers the best alignment with the dataset's characteristics and additional requirements compared to other models on the list.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and performs efficiently with low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the 'small' dataset size tag. It also excels in dealing with sparse and imbalanced data, features that are often encountered in tabular data. Furthermore, LUNAR is optimized for low memory usage and offers a short training time, which matches the dataset's requirement for low memory usage. These characteristics make LUNAR the most appropriate choice from the given model list for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and its compatibility with low-dimensional datasets. It also supports sparse and imbalanced data, which can be advantageous. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Although the dataset size is classified as small and has low memory requirements, LUNAR's specifications align better with the need for low memory compared to other models in the list, making it the best choice among the given options.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset as it specifically targets tabular data, aligns well with the small data size, offers short training time, and can operate under low memory conditions. Additionally, it is designed to work efficiently with low-dimensional datasets, making it well-suited for the defined requirements and constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is specifically strong in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Despite the requirement of low memory, LUNAR's weaknesses do not explicitly include low memory as a limitation, unlike many other models that struggle with small datasets or require high memory. Additionally, LUNAR supports low-dimensional datasets and offers a short training time, making it a better fit compared to others on the list for this small dataset scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and works well on low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset's property of being small and requiring low memory. It offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it efficient even for smaller datasets. Additionally, LUNAR has strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data, which could potentially be beneficial despite these characteristics not being explicitly listed in the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular datasets, which aligns with our dataset type. It can handle small data sizes within its capabilities, offers low memory usage, and features short training times, making it ideal for scenarios that require efficient processing within limited resources. While other models might excel in high-dimensional data or large datasets, LUNAR meets the specific requirements of our small, tabular dataset needing low memory consumption, without any critical weaknesses impacting this context.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a suitable choice for dealing with tabular data, which is the data type present in the dataset. It handles high dimensionality and noisy data well while offering short training times. Despite its higher memory requirement being non-ideal for low memory scenarios, it is the only model from the list with strengths that align closely with the dataset type (tabular data), making it the best option available from the given list.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties since it has strengths in handling tabular data and is designed for low memory usage with short training times, which aligns well with the dataset's requirements of 'small' data size and 'low memory'. Even though it requires GPU and is sensitive to hyperparameters, its strengths with tabular data and handling sparse and imbalanced data make it a good fit for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Despite its weaknesses in handling small data sizes, it has strengths in using low memory, which is a requirement in this case, and can accommodate data of varying sizes efficiently. Additionally, its short training time aligns well with optimizing computational resources for small datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also has strengths in high dimensionality and short training time, and it can manage tabular data well, which is a requirement in the dataset tags. Even though VAE requires high memory, it does not have specific weaknesses around small data sizes like some other models in the list. Therefore, given the need to handle tabular data with low memory requirements in a small dataset, VAE is a reasonable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for the given requirements. It supports tabular data (a key dataset property) and can operate efficiently on small datasets, albeit with careful tuning. While VAE typically needs high memory, its adaptability to tabular data outweighs weaknesses in memory usage. Despite some challenges with discrete or categorical data, it can be fine-tuned more effectively than other models, which have fundamental weaknesses with small dataset sizes or tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small in size and is tabular, with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is the most suitable choice as it is designed for tabular data and supports a short training time, which is beneficial given the dataset's small size. Despite not being low memory, VAE is better aligned with our needs compared to other options that have more pronounced weaknesses with small data and tabular data. Furthermore, VAE supports noisy data, which might be beneficial depending on the dataset characteristics not explicitly mentioned. Although VAE's weaknesses include handling discrete or categorical data poorly, it is still a better match compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for a small, tabular dataset with low memory requirements. It is tailored for low-dimensional and tabular data, and is also efficient for datasets that may be sparse or imbalanced. While it requires a GPU for optimal performance, it addresses low memory requirements by being scalable and having short training times, making it an appropriate choice for a small dataset. Other models in the list struggle with small data size or require high memory, which the dataset's additional requirement does not permit.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles noisy data efficiently and offers short training time, aligning with low memory requirements. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, its strengths match better than other models given the constraints of small data size and low memory.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset as it handles tabular data well, which matches the dataset type. It is also capable of working with small data sizes, which suits the 'small' label of the dataset. Additionally, it has low memory requirements, aligning well with the additional dataset requirement of 'low memory'. Although it's computationally intensive, it provides scalable short training times that are appropriate for efficient processing within low-dimensional datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data and supports high dimensionality, which aligns with the 'tabular data' tag of the dataset. Although the dataset size is small and VAE does not specifically address low memory, it offers short training times compared to other models. Additionally, it is well-suited for handling noisy data, which might be a relevant consideration even if not explicitly tagged. Other models either have significant weaknesses with small datasets or are not recommended for tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and small datasets, and it is optimized for low-dimensional datasets with short training time, which aligns well with the requirement for low memory usage. Despite having some weaknesses such as being computationally intensive, it does not have 'small data size' as a weakness and addresses the major consideration of low memory and quick adaptability to tabular datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is specifically designed for tabular data, which matches the data type requirement. Although the dataset is small, which is generally a weakness of LUNAR, the dataset does not require high memory or computationally intensive models, which aligns well with LUNAR's strengths. LUNAR's ability to handle imbalanced and sparse data effectively without consuming significant memory makes it an ideal choice given the requirement for low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset requires a model suitable for small, tabular data with low memory requirements. VAE has strengths in handling tabular data and is known for short training times, which is crucial for low memory usage. Despite its high memory requirement, it still fits better compared to others, which have weaknesses in small data size or tabular data. VAE's short training time can be leveraged to manage memory more efficiently.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties and requirements. It is specifically designed for tabular data and performs well on low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags. Additionally, LUNAR is resource-efficient with short training times, making it a good fit for the low memory requirement. While it can handle imbalanced and sparse data, it does not require high memory, aligning perfectly with the dataset constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it is suitable for tabular data and small datasets, which aligns with the dataset's properties of being small and tabular. Additionally, LUNAR is capable of handling sparse data and provides short training time, which is beneficial for low memory requirements. Its weaknesses are not particularly detrimental to the dataset's characteristics, given the absence of noisy data and the focus on low-dimensional datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model as it explicitly handles tabular data, which is a requirement given the dataset type. It performs well on low-dimensional datasets, which is often a characteristic of small datasets. Additionally, LUNAR has short training times and is scalable to large datasets, which indirectly suggests efficiency with small datasets and aligns with the low memory requirement. While it is computationally intensive, it does not have a direct 'low memory' weakness like many other models on the list.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Given the dataset's properties—being small and tabular with a low memory requirement—LUNAR is the most suitable model from the list. It is specifically equipped to handle tabular data and small datasets efficiently, particularly in low-memory environments. Its strengths align well with the dataset's needs, despite potential hyperparameter sensitivity, which can be managed with careful tuning.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is small and consists of tabular data with a requirement for low memory usage. Among the models that are suitable for tabular data, VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is one of the few that specifically list tabular data as one of its strengths. Despite some weaknesses with small data sizes, it has relatively fewer negative implications for the current dataset when compared to other models, and does not have a specific weakness for low memory usage, making it a better fit compared to other options.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: ionosphere\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"balanced data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is a suitable choice because it is strong with tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the medium data size. Although it requires high memory, it effectively handles high dimensionality and noisy data, adding robustness to the model, which are important considerations for the dataset characteristics. The main weaknesses of VAE, such as dealing with discrete or categorical data, are not a major concern given the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and can handle balanced datasets effectively. It supports high dimensionality, which aligns with the medium-sized dataset. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Although it requires high memory, it still fits better than other options considering the dataset requirements, as it doesn't have low memory explicitly listed as a requirement but might be preferred if available. Overall, it matches the dataset's characteristics and fulfills most requirements more closely than other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is suitable because it supports medium-sized tabular data, which matches the dataset properties given. It provides good performance on high-dimensionality data, which might be a characteristic of the dataset, and offers a scalable solution with short training time and effectiveness on noisy data. Although it has high memory requirements in practice, the model's strengths align closely with the dataset characteristics, such as balanced data and tabular format, more so than other models available in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it specifically includes tabular data in its strengths and can handle medium-sized datasets. It also offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets. While VAE has high memory requirements, it is the best fit given the emphasis on tabular data and memory efficiency among the options, and the weak factors like imbalanced data and discrete data are not concerns for this balanced and initially described dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and balanced with a low memory requirement. AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data and medium datasets, has strengths in short training time, and is scalable to larger datasets. Although it has a high memory usage, among the model options provided, it aligns best with the dataset characteristics by supporting tabular data and handling noisy data, thus making it a suitable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling tabular, low-dimensional datasets, and imbalanced data with short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the provided dataset properties. Though it has high memory usage as a weakness, its compatibility with balanced tabular data and its efficiency make it a better fit compared to other models that have low memory strength but might struggle with other dataset characteristics such as tabular data or scalability issues.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and balanced. The AutoEncoder model is suitable for tabular data and is known for handling high dimensionality effectively with short training times. Although it requires high memory, which contrasts with the low memory requirement in dataset tags, it doesn't have significant weaknesses for this data size and type. AutoEncoder provides scalability to large datasets, aligning well with the medium data size without significant performance issues, making it a viable choice in this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles medium-sized datasets effectively and is capable of processing high-dimensional data efficiently with the aid of a GPU. Despite having high memory requirements as a weakness, other models have more critical incompatibilities with the dataset, such as weaknesses in handling tabular data or constraints on memory usage. VAE's short training time is beneficial, fitting the low memory requirement indirectly by minimizing resource utilization time.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice as it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also capable of handling medium-sized, balanced datasets effectively with low memory requirements due to its short training time, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its high memory tag, the VAE's short training time suggests efficient use of resources. Other models presented weaknesses related to small data size, low memory handling, or were not optimized for tabular data usage.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, is effective for medium-sized datasets, and aligns well with low memory requirements due to its short training time. Unlike other models listed, it addresses the dataset's characteristics better by handling tabular data and providing scalability to large datasets, despite weak support for imbalanced data. Importantly, VAE's capability to function with low memory and its suitability for the dataset type outweigh its weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for the dataset properties as it supports tabular data, which is the type of data in this case. It handles medium-sized datasets effectively and has a short training time. The model is scalable to large datasets, which caters to potentially varying data sizes, and although it requires high memory, it does not specifically struggle with low memory requirements in the context of medium data sizes where other models may have constraints. The dataset is also balanced, which aligns with VAE's capability to handle data effectively, making it a more optimal choice compared to others with greater weaknesses in tabular or balanced data.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for medium-sized balanced tabular datasets, which matches the given dataset properties. It handles tabular data effectively, offers short training times, and is scalable to large datasets. Additionally, LUNAR is likely to meet the low memory requirement better than other models that specifically mention high memory as a weakness. Its capability to deal with imbalanced data also aligns well with balanced datasets, ensuring robustness to minor class imbalances that might not be evident. Despite being indicated as computationally intensive, it doesn't mention high memory as a primary need, which makes it a compatible choice for the low memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and balanced, with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is a strong candidate because it is suitable for tabular data and has short training times. Although it typically requires high memory, it does not have a specific low memory weakness, unlike MO-GAAL and AE1SVM which are explicitly marked as unsuitable for low memory conditions. Furthermore, VAE's weakness in handling imbalanced data is mitigated as the dataset is balanced, making it the most suitable choice from the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, which is the type of data in the dataset. It can handle medium-sized datasets and operates efficiently with GPU, which is suitable for models requiring short training times. Furthermore, AutoEncoder's strengths include handling high-dimensional and noisy data, and it is designed to have a short training time with scalable capabilities, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics and additional requirements for low memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized, balanced tabular datasets. It specifically lists tabular data as one of its strengths and handles high dimensionality efficiently, which is a common trait in tabular datasets. VAE can operate with a low memory footprint compared to other models, which aligns with the dataset's low memory requirement. Although it uses high memory in some configurations, it offers short training times, making it a practical choice for medium datasets where memory management is a consideration.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, balanced, and requires a model with low memory usage. VAE has strengths in handling tabular data, includes support for medium to large datasets, and has short training time. While it typically requires high memory, it matches well with the majority of the dataset properties and lacks the low memory issue seen in models like AnoGAN, MO-GAAL, and AE1SVM. The models like AE1SVM and ALAD, despite being strong with tabular data, have low memory weaknesses. VAE is thus the most suitable available option considering the given criteria.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is best suited for the given dataset characteristics. It handles 'tabular data' effectively, which matches the dataset type. It also works well with 'medium-sized' data and has 'short training time,' suitable for the 'balanced data' characteristic. Despite its requirement for 'high memory,' it is one of the few models that do not list 'low memory' as a weakness, and it provides good performance on 'tabular data' with 'balanced' datasets compared to others which have more weaknesses aligning with the dataset constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data, handles medium data sizes efficiently, and works well with high dimensional data. While it requires more memory, its high performance on tabular data and relatively short training time make it the best fit for the balanced dataset with low memory requirements considering the strengths and weaknesses of the other models.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is chosen because it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which matches the dataset properties. It is also suitable for medium-sized datasets and offers a short training time with scalability to large datasets. Despite its high memory requirement, it aligns well with the balanced data characteristics and low memory demand compared to other models like AE1SVM, which also has low memory as a weakness. Additionally, AutoEncoder's strengths, such as GPU support and handling noisy data, further align with the dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized, balanced tabular data while having low memory requirements as a relative strength compared to other options. It supports tabular data well, provides short training time, and has scalability to large datasets. This aligns with the dataset's requirement of low memory usage and could manage well with tabular data, offering balance between strengths and weaknesses given the available model choices.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable because it supports tabular data and works well with medium-sized datasets. It offers strengths in scenarios requiring high dimensionality handling, which aligns well with the 'balanced data' characteristic of the dataset. Although it requires high memory, it provides short training time compared to some other models and effectively utilizes GPUs, making it a viable choice given the 'low memory' requirement when balanced against other considerations. While it does have weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, the dataset does not explicitly state these traits, making VAE a strong fit overall.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is most suitable for this dataset since it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. VAE is also efficient with medium-sized datasets and has a short training time, fitting the requirement for low memory consumption. While VAE may have weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these do not conflict significantly with the dataset's characteristics, which include balanced data. Additionally, VAE's ability to handle high dimensionality and its scalability to large datasets make it an ideal choice, addressing the requirements for a robust model with moderate memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, balanced, and consists of tabular data, which aligns well with the strengths of VAE. VAE handles tabular data effectively, supports high-dimensional data, and offers short training times. While it requires high memory, the dataset's low memory requirement is relatively less critical given the other options have more significant mismatches in the weaknesses department. Furthermore, unlike other models, VAE does not have severe weaknesses concerning small data size or low memory that would disqualify it in this context. Therefore, VAE is a suitable choice given the dataset properties and other model alternatives.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular datasets and operates efficiently with balanced data. It supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and has a short training time, meeting the low memory requirement. Although it uses high memory during operation, it is scalable to larger datasets, making it a suitable choice for the given dataset properties. Other models either have stronger weaknesses in handling tabular data or present issues with low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is a suitable choice for the given dataset properties because it supports tabular data and features such as high dimensionality and noisy data, which align well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite having high memory requirements, which is a weakness for datasets with low memory constraints, VAE's strengths include handling tabular data efficiently with a short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it a better fit compared to other models with more critical weaknesses related to the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is highly suitable for the given dataset characteristics since it excels with medium-sized tabular data and is capable of handling high dimensionality and noisy data. It also benefits from low memory requirements, which aligns with the 'low memory' constraint of the dataset. Additionally, it supports short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it a robust choice for the current dataset needs.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and balanced with a requirement for low memory usage. AutoEncoder is strong in handling medium to large datasets, especially for tabular data. It operates well with high dimensionality and offers short training time, making it apt for balanced tabular data applications. Though it typically requires high memory, its strengths with tabular data and high-dimensionality datasets make it the most suitable choice from the given list, despite facing some constraints in low-memory scenarios. It aligns well with the core dataset characteristics and outperforms others in handling the given conditions effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, balanced, and requires low memory usage. AutoEncoder has strengths in handling tabular data, is scalable to large datasets, and requires short training time, which aligns well with the medium data size. Although AutoEncoder typically requires high memory, it still fits better than other models in the list, as all models with low memory strengths do not perform as well with tabular data or have other significant restrictions like small data size. Hence, AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a strong fit for the dataset properties as it supports tabular data and is effective for medium-sized, balanced datasets. VAE handles high-dimensional data, which aligns well with the dataset's tabular type. Despite its requirement for high memory, which isn't ideal for low memory constraints, it accommodates high memory and GPU computation, offering short training times, making it suitable for balanced tabular datasets with specific low-memory adjustments.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. While it requires high memory, it is favored because it supports short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is beneficial for a medium-sized dataset. Additionally, its ability to deal with noisy data aligns well with the dataset characteristics. Although VAE has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, the dataset is balanced, mitigating these concerns. Other models with low memory requirements either do not specialize in tabular data or entail limitations that are more detrimental than VAE's weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable due to its compatibility with tabular data and balanced datasets as indicated by the dataset tags. It can handle medium data sizes well and has the ability to manage high dimensionality, which is often present in tabular data. Additionally, VAE exhibits short training times and can scale to large datasets, making it a good fit for this scenario. Although VAE demands high memory, which conflicts with the 'low memory' requirement, its strengths in other necessary aspects such as handling tabular data and scalability make it the most suitable choice from the list.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is suitable for the given dataset as it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset's type. It also handles medium-sized and balanced data well, as indicated by its scalability to large datasets and short training time. Despite requiring higher memory, its strengths align with the dataset properties better than other models, and it offers low memory usage, making it a suitable fit for the additional requirements of low memory consumption.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is best suited for medium-sized, balanced tabular datasets with low memory requirements. It excels with tabular data and offers high dimensionality capabilities, which is appropriate for the given dataset tags. Additionally, VAE models have short training times and are scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the low memory constraint. While VAE has weaknesses regarding imbalanced data, this is not a concern as the dataset is balanced.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized, balanced, and in tabular form, with a requirement for low memory usage. The AutoEncoder model is suitable for tabular data and is capable of handling balanced datasets. Although it typically requires high memory, it is the most compatible option given the available models, as it provides efficient handling of tabular data with short training times. Additionally, its scalability to large datasets means it can efficiently use resources even with a medium data size.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is most suitable for the given dataset properties which include medium-sized, balanced, tabular data with low memory requirements. LUNAR has strengths in handling tabular data and supports low-dimensional and sparse datasets, which aligns with the characteristics of the provided data. Additionally, it offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is advantageous. Although it is high memory-intensive, the short training time and its suitability for tabular data make it the best fit compared to other options in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and can handle medium-sized datasets effectively. It offers a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it appropriate for balanced data and low memory requirements. Despite its sensitivity to hyperparameters and somewhat high memory usage, its strengths align closely with the dataset characteristics, especially since it addresses the need for efficient use of computational resources.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles medium data sizes and supports high dimensionality, which can be beneficial for diverse tabular datasets. Despite requiring more memory and not being ideal for low memory constraints, its strengths in tabular data and ability to process noisy data over short training times make it a suitable option among available models. VAE's capability to handle medium-sized datasets and scalability to larger datasets align well with the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. The dataset is of medium size and balanced, and LUNAR can handle such datasets efficiently with its short training time and scalability to large datasets. Additionally, it operates well within low-memory environments, making it a good fit given the low memory requirement of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It can handle medium-sized datasets efficiently. Although it requires high memory, its short training time and scalability to large datasets fit the requirement of low memory better than other options. Moreover, VAE handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, making it robust for varied data quality.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized, balanced, tabular data while being sensitive to low memory requirements. VAE's strengths include its compatibility with tabular data, balanced data scenarios, and its efficient memory usage. It also features short training times and scalability, making it apt for managing medium-sized datasets with constraints on memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is selected because it aligns well with the given dataset properties. It is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data, and it handles high dimensionality effectively. Even though it generally requires high memory, its capability to work with tabular data and short training time make it a suitable candidate given the balanced nature of the dataset. Other models either have weaknesses with tabular data or low memory constraints which do not align well with the dataset needs.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is the most suitable model for this medium-sized, balanced tabular dataset with low memory requirements. It has strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, aligns well with the dataset's tags. Despite its high memory requirement in general, it is capable of short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it efficient for this medium-sized dataset. This aligns closely with the dataset's need for low memory usage, more so than its alternatives, based on their weaknesses with low memory.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is suitable for the given medium-sized, tabular, and balanced dataset as it specifically lists tabular data as one of its strengths. It also has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data and is compatible with GPU acceleration, which may help in reducing memory usage compared to CPU. Although VAE generally requires high memory, it does have a short training time and has been effectively applied to large datasets, making it a reasonable choice under low memory constraints compared to other models which have explicit weaknesses in low memory usage. Additionally, VAE's weaknesses are mostly irrelevant to the provided dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is suitable for the given dataset properties because it is designed to work well with tabular data, which aligns with the data type of the dataset. The dataset is medium-sized and balanced, which fits well with VAE's capability of handling tabular data and medium datasets. Additionally, VAE has a short training time and does not inherently require low memory, which matches the requirement of low memory constraints. Although VAE requires high memory, it provides a compromise given the dataset characteristics, as other models with low memory have more significant weaknesses related to the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for medium-sized, balanced, tabular data, as it explicitly lists tabular data as a strength. It handles high-dimensional datasets and can operate efficiently with high memory setups. While AutoEncoder prefers a GPU setup, the requirement for low memory is a challenge, but it seems to be less of a hindrance than the weaknesses of other models. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which aligns well with the given dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data, aligning with the dataset's properties. It handles tabular data efficiently, supports high dimensionality, and offers short training time with scalability to large datasets. Despite requiring high memory, it excels in tabular data tasks and can meet the low memory requirement better than other models, which often pose lack of support for tabular data or have longer training times. Additionally, AutoEncoder is capable of handling balanced data efficiently.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized, balanced tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. It has strengths in handling tabular data and is capable of dealing with high-dimensionality and noisy data. The model also supports GPU, which is beneficial for efficient computation. While it typically requires high memory, its short training time compensates for this, aligning with the dataset's low memory requirement. Among the models in the list, VAE's strengths make it the most appropriate choice given the dataset characteristics and additional requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. The data size being medium aligns with VAE's ability to handle large datasets efficiently. Although VAE does require high memory, its capability to manage high dimensionality, short training time, and compatibility with tabular data make it the best choice given the dataset's characteristics and requirements. Weaknesses related to discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data are not issues here since the provided dataset is balanced.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It has strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, which fits well with the dataset characteristics. Although VAE requires high memory, it offers short training time and scalability to large datasets. Its proficiency with tabular data aligns with the dataset type, and it suits the balanced data due to its high model capacity. While it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and CPU processing, these do not conflict significantly with the given dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is chosen because it is well-suited for medium-sized, balanced tabular data, which matches the dataset's properties. It has strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, accommodating the needs perfectly. Additionally, AutoEncoder has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the low memory constraint to some extent. Although it requires higher memory, its strengths outweigh its weaknesses for this scenario, making it the best available choice from the list provided.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: wbc\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"medium\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"low-signal data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"CPU\", \"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and satisfies the low-memory requirement, given that it excels on sparse and imbalanced data, which are common characteristics of low-signal data. Its strengths include working efficiently with CPU resources and demonstrating short training times. Despite its computational demands, these are more manageable than the memory requirements or GPU dependencies of other models. LUNAR's ability to scale to large datasets ensures adaptability to medium-sized data while effectively handling low-dimensional features.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it supports tabular data well, aligns with the CPU and low memory constraints due to its short training time, and handles medium-sized datasets effectively. While it may have weaknesses related to high memory, the dataset's characteristics such as being medium in size and tabular make LUNAR a viable option among the given models. Additionally, despite the low-signal data challenge, LUNAR's capacity to manage imbalanced and sparse data themes may provide some advantage in managing low-signal data scenarios.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low signal that needs to be processed on a CPU with low memory. AutoEncoder is adept at handling tabular data and medium-size datasets while dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data. Despite its weakness in low-signal data and CPU environments, it offers short training time and scalability, making it a suitable choice considering the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is suitable for tabular data and is designed to handle low-dimensional datasets with sparse and imbalanced data. It excels in scenarios requiring short training times and scalability to large datasets, aligning with the medium data size and CPU/low memory constraints specified. Additionally, its strengths in tabular data make it an appropriate choice, despite its high memory weakness, as no other model perfectly fits all requirements with respect to low-signal data and low memory; however, LUNAR's ability to handle sparse data compensates for low-signal challenges.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it handles tabular data well, which aligns with the dataset type. Despite primarily requiring GPU, VAE's short training time can compensate for CPU constraints to a certain extent. Its capabilities for medium-sized datasets, combined with managing low-memory environments occasionally, make it a reasonable fit for low-signal data, given other models have significant weaknesses here.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and constraints. It specifically handles 'tabular data' efficiently and is capable of operating on 'low-dimensional datasets', which aligns with the current 'medium' size and 'low-signal data' characteristics. Additionally, LUNAR has strengths in scalability and short training time, which can be beneficial considering the 'low memory' requirement and 'CPU' preference. While it has some weaknesses for high memory use and computational intensity, these are mitigated by its ability to handle imbalanced and sparse data in tabular formats effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model as it specifically supports tabular data, which aligns well with the dataset type. It is also efficient with low-memory requirements, which fits the dataset's additional requirements of CPU and low memory. Furthermore, LUNAR handles sparse and imbalanced data well, which may align with the low-signal data tag. Despite some weaknesses with noisy data and high memory issues, these do not conflict significantly with the specific requirements of the provided dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and is designed to handle low-dimensional datasets, which matches the dataset's medium size and tabular data type. LUNAR supports CPU processing, is low memory intensive, and offers short training times, aligning with the additional constraints of low memory and CPU usage. Although this dataset is tagged as low-signal, which is not LUNAR's strongest area, it is the best available option from the list considering the dataset's characteristics and the other models' weaknesses in tabular or CPU-based settings.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it specifically handles tabular data, which matches the dataset type provided. It is designed to work well with low-dimensional datasets and CPU constraints, fitting the low-memory requirement. Despite being somewhat sensitive to hyperparameters, LUNAR has a short training time and scalability, making it suitable for a medium-sized dataset. While it may not fully address low-signal data, its strengths align better with the dataset properties compared to other models, which have notable weaknesses related to low-signal data or CPU usage.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It operates well with low-dimensional datasets and sparse data, aligning with the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset. LUNAR also has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets without requiring high memory, which fits the additional requirements of CPU and low memory constraints. While hyperparameter sensitivity is a concern, it does not outweigh the fit to dataset characteristics compared to the weaknesses found in other models.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the best choice because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also suitable for datasets requiring low memory and operates well with CPU, addressing the additional dataset requirements. It efficiently manages medium-sized datasets and low-signal data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite being GPU-optimized and having some computational intensity issues, its ability to handle low-dimensional and imbalanced data makes it the most fitting model for the given dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is medium-sized tabular data which requires low memory and CPU usage, with the additional challenge of being low-signal data. VAE supports tabular data, handles high dimensionality and noisy data, and has a short training time. While it generally favors GPU and high memory systems, among the model options, it aligns best with the dataset's type and requirements, especially for tabular data, and has a short training time beneficial for development efficiency.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles low-dimensional datasets effectively and can deal with sparse or imbalanced data efficiently. It operates on GPU, supporting short training times and large dataset scalability, meeting the 'medium' data size requirement despite its 'computationally intensive' drawback. Furthermore, it aligns with the 'low memory' requirement by avoiding high memory usage associated with other models.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It can handle low-dimensional datasets efficiently and is scalable to large datasets, making it suitable for the medium data size. Moreover, it has low memory requirements and a short training time, which align with the CPU and low memory constraints of the dataset. Although it has some weaknesses with noisy data and is computationally intensive, the other models have more deficiencies with low-signal data or require higher memory or GPU, making LUNAR the best fit given the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected as it aligns best with the dataset's characteristics. Given the medium-sized, tabular data that is low-signal and requires CPU with low memory, LUNAR has strengths in handling tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, and can be utilized with short training time despite the low memory constraint. Although LUNAR requires GPU and is computationally intensive, it is the most suitable model considering the other options have significant weaknesses like poor performance with low-signal data or reliance on GPU and high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is a suitable choice for tabular data with low signal, characteristic of medium-sized datasets. It performs well with sparse and imbalanced data while utilizing GPU efficiently and providing short training times. Although LUNAR's high computational intensity can be a downside, it aligns closely with the dataset requirements for low memory and CPU limitations compared to other models that have higher memory demands and longer training times.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data and is designed for low-dimensional datasets, matching the dataset's characteristics of being medium in size and tabular. Additionally, it requires low memory and CPU, aligning well with the dataset's constraints. While LUNAR has a weakness with noisy data, this is not a significant issue given the dataset's primary characteristic of low-signal data rather than noisy data.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen as it aligns well with the dataset properties. It is suited for tabular data, operates efficiently on CPU with low memory usage, and can handle medium-sized datasets. Although it's sensitive to hyperparameters, it has the benefits of short training time and scalability, which are essential given the CPU and low-memory requirements. The ability to work well with low-dimensional datasets is an additional strength that complements the dataset's low-signal characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is specifically designed for tabular data and works well with low memory and CPU resources as per the dataset requirements. It is also suitable for medium-sized datasets and avoids the weaknesses related to noisy data. Despite being computationally intensive, its short training time aligns well with the need for CPU-efficient operations, making it the best fit given the low-signal characteristic and the constraints outlined by the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice as it is explicitly designed to handle tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. It also accommodates the need for handling medium-sized data, offering scalability to large datasets with short training times. Although it runs on GPU and can be computationally intensive, it does not require excessive memory, aligning with the low-memory requirement. Additionally, while it can be sensitive to hyperparameters, it is less influenced by the low-signal data characteristic compared to some others in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected because it is suitable for tabular data and can handle high dimensionality efficiently, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. The model has a short training time and can be scaled to large datasets, making it suitable for medium-sized data. While it has a weakness for low-signal data, it is more compatible with the requirements (CPU and low memory) compared to other options in the list like DevNet and ALAD, which have notable weaknesses for low-signal data and high memory requirements. AutoEncoder handles noisy data and tabular formats well, while the other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, and ALAD have significant weaknesses with tabular data or low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It has strengths in handling low-dimensional datasets, aligning with the low-signal characteristic. Although it requires high memory, it is CPU-capable, which satisfies the additional requirement. LUNAR also offers short training times, which is beneficial given the medium-sized dataset and CPU constraints, making it the most fitting choice among the given options.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it specifically caters to tabular data and supports low-dimensional datasets with its capability of handling sparse and imbalanced data effectively. Although high memory might be a concern, the model's compatibility with CPU and short training time align well with the dataset's low memory requirement. Furthermore, LUNAR can handle datasets with low signal efficiently, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics provided.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and can handle imbalanced and sparse data which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It has a short training time and does not require high memory, matching the additional requirements of CPU and low memory. Although LUNAR shows weaknesses in handling noisy data and requires careful hyperparameter tuning, its strengths in handling the tabular format and quick scalability make it the most compatible choice given the dataset's medium size and need for computational efficiency.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset since it is compatible with tabular data and has a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's medium size and low memory requirements. Although it has a weakness for CPU usage, it handles tabular data efficiently, making it a balanced choice given the other options, which are less suited due to either not supporting tabular data or having other significant weaknesses related to the dataset properties like low-signal data or high memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and constraints. It specifically handles tabular data well, which aligns with the dataset's structure. LUNAR is also designed for low-dimensional and sparse data, which matches the low-signal characteristic of this dataset. Despite the CPU requirement noted as a weakness, its strengths such as short training time and scalability to large datasets make it a viable option for a medium-sized dataset with low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is designed to handle tabular data, which matches our dataset type. Additionally, it is suitable for medium-sized datasets, offers scalability to large datasets, and focuses on imbalanced and sparse data. While it uses GPU, one of its weaknesses is hyperparameter sensitivity, but for low memory requirements, it is a better fit compared to other models, which either require high memory or are not optimized for CPU. Furthermore, none of the models explicitly handle low-signal data well, making LUNAR a more balanced choice given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is suitable for tabular data and can handle medium-sized datasets efficiently on a CPU. It supports low-memory operations and is designed for short training time, making it ideal for constrained memory environments. While it is sensitive to noisy data, it doesn't have the same degree of weakness for low-signal data as other models such as DevNet or ALAD, making it the most balanced choice for this dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected as the most suitable model because it is designed to handle tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It operates effectively on low-dimensional datasets, which might be beneficial given that the dataset is characterized as low-signal data. LUNAR also has strengths in handling imbalanced and sparse data, which are common challenges in low-signal data scenarios. Additionally, it supports short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it efficient in terms of both time and resource use, fitting the CPU and low memory requirements. Despite its use of GPUs mainly, its ability to perform well with the dataset's characteristics makes it the best option given the limitations of other models related to low-signal data or CPU compatibility.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected as it is strong in handling tabular data, which is the type of this dataset. Additionally, it supports low-dimensional datasets and sparse data, which might align with the 'low-signal data' characteristic. LUNAR also benefits from short training time and scalability to large datasets, which are advantageous given the medium data size. Despite its weakness in noisy data, the model is preferred due to the dataset's 'low memory' requirement as it doesn't list high memory usage as a limitation, and it can be computationally supported with a CPU.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular data and possesses strengths in handling noise, a common issue in low-signal data. While it generally performs better on high memory systems and GPU, its strengths align more closely with the dataset requirements than the other models. Despite its slight limitation on CPU-based systems, it remains one of the few models that effectively handle tabular data, which is crucial given the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it handles tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset type. Although the dataset has low-signal data, VAE's strengths in tabular data outweigh its weaknesses. It uses high memory and a GPU, fitting the dataset's low memory constraint on a CPU, making it more suitable than others. VAE's short training time and good performance on medium-sized datasets and scalability align well with the dataset size of medium without large computational demands.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and requirements. The dataset is medium-sized, tabular in format, and requires the model to operate on a CPU with low memory usage. While VAE's main strength is handling tabular data, it also performs well on medium-sized datasets and has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low-memory requirement. Although VAE typically requires GPU and high memory for optimal performance, its adaptability to tabular data and strong capacity for high-dimensional data processing make it preferable over other options, which either don't handle tabular data well or have significant weaknesses in terms of memory usage and computational resource requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and scales to medium-sized datasets with low memory requirements, matching the given dataset properties. It supports short training times and is capable of handling imbalanced and sparse data, aligning well with the 'low memory' and 'CPU' constraints. Its weaknesses, such as noisy data and high memory, are less concerning given the dataset characteristics of 'low-signal data' and 'medium size'.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice because it supports tabular data, which is the dataset's type, and is optimized for low-dimensional datasets. Its strengths include handling sparse and imbalanced data, which could be relevant due to the low-signal nature. Additionally, it is designed for short training times and scalable to large datasets, making it compatible with a medium-sized dataset and CPU requirements. Although there is a mention of high memory usage among its weaknesses, other models have significant weaknesses like low-signal data issues or are primarily GPU-optimized, which makes LUNAR the best fit overall given the conditions.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice given the dataset tags and requirements. It is specifically strong with tabular data, which matches the data type we have, and works well with low memory use and short training times. Although LUNAR typically uses GPU, its overall strengths in handling tabular data and short training times outweigh any weaknesses associated with high memory use. Additionally, LUNAR does not have a particular weakness for low-signal data, making it an appropriate choice for the given dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and handles low-dimensional datasets well, which aligns with the medium-sized, tabular nature of the dataset. It is designed to operate in environments with limited memory and CPU, important given the dataset's low memory requirement. Although it has weaknesses with high memory and noisy data, its strengths in short training time and scalability make it a fitting choice over other models, considering the low-signal aspect and resource constraints of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the data type provided. It also handles high dimensionality and noisy data, which can align with low-signal data characteristics. Although it has a weakness in using CPU and low memory environments, other models have more severe weaknesses for this scenario, making VAE the most balanced choice given the dataset properties and computational constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is recommended because it aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It supports tabular data and is suitable for moderate-sized datasets. While it generally benefits from GPU, it also offers short training time which helps in situations with CPU constraints. Although VAE typically requires higher memory, its capability in handling low-signal data—while not a direct strength noted—overrides the other models, whose weaknesses more directly conflict with the dataset tags, especially those that require low memory and CPU constraints. Moreover, other models like ALAD and AutoEncoder have explicit weaknesses with low-signal data or CPU, making VAE a more balanced choice.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it supports tabular data and is suitable for medium-sized datasets. Despite being a model that typically requires high memory and GPU, it satisfies the tabular data requirement and can handle sparse and imbalanced data efficiently, which aligns well with the given dataset characteristics. While low-signal data is a noted weakness, the focus on tabular data makes it the least conflicting choice among those available. Also, it is scalable to larger datasets which is advantageous in moderate dataset handling.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AE1SVM\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AE1SVM is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, which matches our dataset's type. Despite its weakness in CPU and low memory environments, it has a strong ability to handle imbalanced and sparse data as well as high dimensionality, which provides versatility. Additionally, while not perfect for low-signal data, the availability of short training times can be beneficial for optimizing model performance without excessive computational costs. Other models either perform poorly on tabular or low-signals, rely heavily on GPU or high memory, or have longer training times, making them less optimal for the described dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the dataset properties provided. It supports tabular data and is designed to handle low-dimensional datasets, which aligns well with the 'low-signal data' characteristic. It is also efficient on CPU and has low memory requirements, which matches the 'CPU' and 'low memory' constraints of the dataset. Unlike other models, it doesn't have a significant weakness for low-signal data, making it an optimal choice despite some weaknesses in noisy data and hyperparameter sensitivity, which are not primary dataset concerns.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for this dataset. The dataset consists of medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics. Although VAE has a weakness with CPU usage, it is strong with tabular data, short training time, and handling noisy data, which aligns closely with the dataset characteristics. Other models have significant weaknesses with low-signal data or are more suited to GPU and high memory, which contradicts the requirement for CPU and low memory usage. Therefore, despite the CPU limitation, VAE is the best trade-off given these constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected due to its strong suitability for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It specializes in handling low-dimensional and sparse datasets, fitting the dataset tag well, and has the advantage of short training time. Moreover, it operates efficiently on CPU and is less memory-intensive compared to other options. Despite LUNAR's sensitivity to hyperparameters, its ability to manage tabular data on a CPU with low memory requirements makes it the most suitable choice for the given dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is suitable for tabular data and is designed to handle low-dimensional datasets, which may be advantageous for low-signal data. It also operates well with CPUs and has low memory requirements, addressing the additional requirements provided. Despite its weaknesses in handling noisy data and being computationally intensive, it is the best fit among the available models for the given dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is best suited for this scenario as it aligns well with the dataset properties. It supports tabular data, which matches the given data type, and it is efficient in low-dimensional datasets, addressing the low-signal data characteristic. Despite its weakness with high memory requirements, it provides a good balance for medium data size, operates effectively on CPU, and has short training time, which is advantageous given the low memory constraint.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice because it specifically excels with tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also designed for low-dimensional datasets, meeting the low-signal characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR is efficient with short training time and scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the medium data size and low memory requirements, making it compatible with CPU processing.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it is suitable for tabular data and medium-sized datasets. While it typically requires more memory, it is well-suited for scenarios that involve high dimensionality and noisy data. Despite the low-signal nature of the dataset, VAE has the best compatibility with the requirement for working on CPU-based systems compared to other options, though the memory constraint is a consideration. Models like DevNet, AnoGAN, and AutoEncoder were less suitable due to their drawbacks with low-signal data or CPU incompatibility.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and resource constraints. It is well-suited for tabular data, matches the requirement for handling low memory contexts, and can efficiently handle datasets with low-signal characteristics thanks to its sensitivity to features. Moreover, LUNAR's strengths in handling low-dimensional tabular datasets align well with the medium data size requirement, and while it typically requires a GPU for optimal performance, it does not suffer significantly from low memory constraints like some other models in the list. Additionally, it offers short training times which is ideal given the CPU requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and low-dimensional datasets. It also offers a short training time, making it efficient for medium data sizes. Although it employs GPU for improved performance, the low memory requirement and CPU usage requirement are critical due to its select strengths that align with tabular data without the need for high memory resources, which compensates for its computational intensity. Unlike others, LUNAR is less affected by the low-signal data present in the dataset.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: glass\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"small\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [\"low-signal data\"],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is specifically designed for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Additionally, LUNAR is efficient for low-dimensional datasets and offers short training times, making it a good fit for handling small datasets while being scalable to large datasets if necessary. It also effectively deals with sparse and imbalanced data, which are common concerns in low-signal datasets. Although it poses some memory concerns, its strengths in handling tabular and low-signal datasets outweigh these challenges, especially given the constraints of low memory and small data sizes.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is specifically strong with tabular data and is suitable for low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also meets the requirement of being suitable for a small data size due to its short training time and ability to scale to a variety of dataset sizes without high memory demands. Despite its hyperparameter sensitivity, it is the best fit among the available options given the dataset's characteristics as low-signal data with low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for small tabular datasets and can handle low-signal data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It supports tabular data and has a short training time, essential for low memory environments. Although it has some weaknesses with imbalanced and sparse data, these issues are less critical given the dataset constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and works well even with noisy data, which is important considering the dataset's characteristics of low-signal data. Even though small data size is a challenge, VAE is capable of handling it better among the options available. It requires low memory compared to many other models, and has a short training time, making it a good fit given the requirement for low memory.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Despite the dataset being tagged as low-signal, LUNAR does not explicitly have a weakness in this area compared to others. Additionally, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets, supports low-dimensional datasets, and has short training time, all of which are beneficial even for small data sizes. Importantly, it suits low memory requirements better than other models listed, which often require high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the best choice as it specifically excels with tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles low-dimensional datasets effectively, relevant for small data with low-signal characteristics and is able to work with low memory constraints due to its short training time. While LUNAR can be computationally intensive and sensitive to hyperparameters, these weaknesses are less critical for small datasets with low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is chosen because it specifically supports tabular data, works well with low-dimensional datasets, and is noted for its short training time, which is advantageous for a small dataset. Additionally, it does not have significant memory requirements which align with the dataset's low memory need. Although it is sensitive to hyperparameters, its suitability for tabular and sparse data, combined with robust scalability, makes it an optimal choice for this small, low-memory, low-signal dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data and has short training time, which aligns with the requirement of handling a small dataset with low memory usage. It handles tabular data well and can work with high dimensionality, addressing the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset. While it is not optimized for low memory, its capability to handle tabular data makes it the best fit from the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it supports tabular data, which is the type of the given dataset. Even though it generally handles larger datasets, it performs well with low memory usage and has the ability for short training times which is suitable given the requirement for low memory. Its weakness with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data isn't major given the dataset characteristics, which focus more on low-signal data rather than data balance.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is chosen because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which is applicable to the dataset's data type. Despite having weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, VAE is well-suited for low memory and small data sizes due to its short training time. Additionally, it can efficiently process high-dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of being low-signal. VAE also supports GPU usage, which might help mitigate the low memory requirement by optimizing computation.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and can handle low-dimensional datasets, matching our dataset type and characteristics. Despite having weaknesses related to noisy data, LUNAR does not explicitly have weaknesses for small datasets and low memory, which are critical requirements for our scenario. Furthermore, it offers short training time and scalability, making it an appropriate choice for handling the provided dataset's constraints effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and handles imbalanced and sparse datasets efficiently. While it has high memory usage, its strengths in short training time and scalability make it optimal for small datasets, especially given the low-signal data characteristics where it fits better than other options. The weaknesses related to high memory and hyperparameter sensitivity are balanced by its compatibility with tabular data and a shorter training time, which satisfies the low-memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Although it generally performs better on larger datasets, it can still be used for small datasets unlike other options. It requires low memory usage during training, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. While VAE has some weaknesses with certain types of data, its support for tabular data and low memory usage makes it the most appropriate choice given the limitations of the other models.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is chosen because it handles tabular data effectively and is suitable for datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, which are characteristics that may align with low-signal data. Despite requiring high memory, which is a concern for this dataset tag, VAE stands out for its ability to process tabular data efficiently, which is crucial given the dataset's small size and tabular nature. The short training time also adds an advantage in conditions where computational resources may be limited.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling tabular data and its capability to work with low-dimensional and sparse datasets. It aligns well with the dataset properties of being small, tabular, and low-memory, while not having weaknesses that heavily contradict these properties. Other models either have weaknesses in dealing explicitly with small datasets or tabular data, or require high memory, making them less suitable.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It has strengths for handling high dimensionality and short training time. Although VAE typically requires a larger dataset, it is the best option given the constraints, especially since it can handle tabular data with higher dimensionality and short training time, balancing the dataset's small size and low-signal characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. Although it's strong on larger datasets, it has the advantage of handling low-signal data better than the other models in the list. It also operates efficiently in a low memory setting compared to others that have high memory requirements. While it is not specifically optimized for small datasets, its strengths in tabular data make it the best fit given the model choices.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. Additionally, it performs well with low-dimensional datasets and is scalable to large datasets while offering short training time, making it suitable for low-signal data. Despite needing GPU, LUNAR's strength in low-memory situations and compatibility with small datasets aligns it better than other models in the list considering the given constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. The key strengths of LUNAR include handling tabular data and low-dimensional datasets, which aligns well with the dataset tags. Additionally, LUNAR's short training time and scalability make it a better fit given the requirement of low memory. Even though it has hypersensitivity and is computationally intensive, these issues are more manageable compared to the weaknesses of other models, such as their inability to handle small data sizes or low-signal data effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is most suitable for the dataset properties because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also performs well with low-dimensional datasets and sparse data, which align with the characteristics of low-signal data. It has the advantage of short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is beneficial for small data sizes and low memory requirements. Though not explicitly mentioned for low memory, its scalability and short training time suggest efficient use of resources, making it the best fit among other options.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it supports tabular data, requires a short training time, is scalable to large datasets, and does not demand high memory. These strengths align with the dataset requirements: tabular data, low memory, and small data size. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data and high memory usage, it has fewer incompatibilities with the given dataset than the other models.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and is suitable for scenarios with low memory requirements and short training time, as indicated by its strengths. Although it has weaknesses like handling discrete or categorical data, these are not mentioned as characteristics of the dataset. Other models either have weaknesses such as handling small data size or low-signal data, or they are not suited for tabular data, which excludes them as suitable choices.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. Despite its weakness with discrete or categorical data, VAE has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's 'tabular data' type. While the dataset is small, leading to a potential drawback for VAE, its short training time and ability to handle noise make it an appropriate choice. Moreover, VAE's low memory requirement aligns with the dataset's additional requirement of 'low memory', providing an efficient and effective solution for the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for small tabular datasets, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. It supports tabular data, and while it uses GPU and high memory, it offers a short training time. Despite the low-signal data being a concern, VAE's ability to handle short training times makes it more viable than other options, which have more critical weaknesses for small datasets, low memory, and tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it performs well on tabular data and small data sizes given its capacity for efficient handling of low-dimensional datasets and short training time, which fits the low memory requirement. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data and high memory, these are not prioritized concerns given the dataset's characteristics. The model's scalability to large datasets and dealing with imbalanced data are additional benefits, which infer flexibility and adaptability in unexplored areas of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, short training time, and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Although the dataset is small and low-signal, LUNAR does not have specific weaknesses in these areas, making it a viable choice given the constraints of low memory usage and the requirement to use tabular data effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it handles tabular data well, which fits the dataset type. Despite potential weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, its strengths like short training time and capability to work on high-dimensional and low-memory configurations make it suitable for a small dataset with low-signal data while ensuring efficient memory usage.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for this scenario due to its compatibility with tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. Furthermore, it has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low-memory requirement, and it can effectively handle noisy data, a characteristic that can help manage low-signal data. Despite its strength in handling more significant datasets, the VAE's versatility with tabular data and its effectiveness in scenarios where memory efficiency is crucial make it a more favorable choice compared to the other models in the list, which have limitations with small data or low-memory settings.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It supports low-dimensional datasets and operates with low memory requirements, addressing the dataset's characteristics and additional requirements. Additionally, it has a short training time, which is advantageous for small data sizes. Therefore, LUNAR best meets the dataset's needs compared to the other models listed.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular data, aligns with the requirement for low memory usage due to its short training time, and handles sparse and imbalanced data effectively, which could be beneficial for low-signal data. Although it has some weaknesses, such as high memory and hyperparameter sensitivity, the match to the dataset's characteristics makes it the most suitable choice from the provided options.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Although VAE typically requires large datasets and has a high memory requirement, it is one of the few models that supports tabular data in the list. Given its strength in handling tabular data and short training time, it can be optimized for small datasets. Additionally, VAE does well with noisy data which can compensate somewhat for the low-signal aspect of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it is well-suited for tabular, low-dimensional data and supports small datasets. Moreover, it has strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced datasets, while having low memory requirements and short training time, which aligns with the additional requirement of low memory usage in the dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is suitable for small tabular datasets, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It handles sparse and imbalanced data, which may relate to the low-signal data in the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR requires low memory usage and has short training times, making it ideal for the specified low memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for tabular data with low-dimensional datasets, which matches the dataset type (tabular) and small size. It has strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data, and it operates efficiently with low memory requirements, making it a good fit for the given characteristics and additional requirements of low memory. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time, making it a practical choice for datasets with low-signal data where complex models might not yield significant benefits.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is chosen because it is suitable for tabular data and small data size, which align with the dataset's requirements. It offers strengths like handling low-dimensional datasets and short training time, while being scalable to large datasets. Despite weaknesses like hyperparameter sensitivity, LUNAR's capabilities make it the best fit for the given low-signal, low-memory dataset scenario compared to other models, which generally struggle with small data size or low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice as it is specifically strong with tabular data and small datasets, which matches the dataset properties. Its strengths include low-dimensional datasets and short training time, which align with the requirements for handling low memory environments and low-signal data, despite its sensitivity to hyperparameters. Although other models have certain strengths with tabular data, they tend to struggle with small data sizes or low-signal data, making LUNAR the best fit for the given requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, and sparse data. It also offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which can be an advantage given the low-memory requirement. While LUNAR is sensitive to hyperparameters, it uniquely matches the use case of low-memory tabular data better than the alternatives, especially since most other models face significant weaknesses with small data sizes, low signals, or memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is a suitable choice as it supports tabular data and features like low memory usage and short training time, aligning well with the dataset's properties of small data size and low memory requirement. Despite its weaknesses with imbalanced data, this is not a highlighted concern for the dataset, making VAE a balanced choice considering its strengths and the limitations of other models.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it supports tabular data and is well-suited for handling low-dimensional and sparse datasets. It is efficient in terms of memory usage, which aligns with the low memory requirement of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it a robust choice despite its computational intensity weakness. Furthermore, its strengths address low-dimensionality and imbalanced data, which are often characteristics of low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, which corresponds with the dataset characteristics. Although it does not specifically mention handling small datasets, it offers short training time and scalability, which can be beneficial for low memory environments. Its ability to handle sparse and imbalanced data, coupled with low-dimensional datasets, makes it a suitable choice compared to other options that either struggle with small datasets or are less aligned with the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its compatibility with tabular data and its capability to handle low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the small data size requirement. Additionally, it is designed for low memory consumption and short training times, making it a better fit compared to other models with high memory requirements or long training times. Despite the dataset being labeled as low-signal, LUNAR's strengths and lack of significant weaknesses in this context make it the optimal choice from the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It supports tabular data and is known for working with low-dimensional datasets, aligning with the 'small' and 'low memory' requirements. Although 'low-signal data' is not its strength, it's less unsuitable than other models in the list, as many other models are ineffective with small datasets or require high memory.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model because it explicitly supports tabular data and functions well with small datasets due to its short training time. Moreover, it addresses the requirement of low memory usage better than alternatives that have high memory demands. Despite its weakness with imbalanced data, VAE's strengths are more aligned with the dataset characteristics compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is well-suited for small, low-memory environments with tabular data. It excels in handling tabular data and requires short training time, which aligns with the dataset requirements. Although LUNAR has computationally intensive operations, it is tailored for low-memory and tabular datasets, making it the best fit when considering both the dataset characteristics and model weaknesses of others in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties of small data size, tabular data, and low memory requirements. It supports tabular data effectively and is efficient with short training time. While LUNAR is computationally intensive, it does not explicitly have a weakness for low memory scenarios compared to other models, which makes it a comparatively better choice. Furthermore, it is scalable to large datasets, which indicates it is robust enough to handle the dataset within memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and has a relatively short training time, which meets the dataset's characteristics of low memory and small size. While it does not excel in low-signal data, it is more aligned with the 'tabular data' requirement compared to other models. Moreover, it offers strengths in handling tabular data and has a modest memory footprint when tailored correctly, making it preferable for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: Given the dataset requirements, VAE is the best choice due to its strengths in handling tabular data and its adaptability to small datasets. While VAE typically requires high memory, it balances this with short training times, which may offset the memory constraint to some extent. Furthermore, VAE can effectively deal with the challenge of low-signal data better than the other models in the evaluation, which typically have weaknesses associated with small data sizes or memory constraints. On balance, VAE aligns best with the dataset tags despite some memory demands.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it supports tabular data and is adept at handling sparse and imbalanced data, both of which may be relevant for low-signal datasets. Additionally, it offers a short training time and scalability, which is crucial given the low-memory requirement. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data and high memory usage, its overall strengths align better with the requirements than other models, especially since it can handle tabular data and maintain a smaller computational footprint compared to others.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it handles tabular data effectively and is designed for low-dimensional datasets, which is compatible with the 'small' data size and 'low-signal data' characteristics. Additionally, it requires short training time and is scalable, which balances well with the 'low memory' requirement. Although it has weaknesses in terms of noisy data, the strengths in handling tabular data and the capacity to work with small and sparse datasets make it the best fit among the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for tabular data which matches the dataset tag. Despite its general preference for larger datasets, its strengths in handling tabular data and short training times make it a more viable option given the constraints. Its weakness with discrete or categorical data aligns with the potential challenges in the dataset, but it offers a balanced set of strengths fitting well with the dataset's small size and requirement for low memory. It is the best fit among the available options considering the overall characteristics of the dataset and the other models' weaknesses in handling low-signal and small datasets.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: satimage-2\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"Data size\": [\"large\"],\n", + " \"Data type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"Domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"Characteristics\": [],\n", + " \"Additional requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for large tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags of 'large' and 'tabular data'. It has strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data, and it is scalable to large datasets with a short training time which is advantageous given the 'low memory' requirement. Despite its requirement for high memory, its scalability and efficiency with large datasets make it the best choice among the listed models.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it handles tabular data efficiently, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, addressing the dataset's large size and low memory requirements. Although it has a weakness in handling noisy data, this is a lesser concern compared to other models whose major weaknesses align unfavorably with the dataset characteristics like low memory.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data with a large dataset size. It supports tabular data, has high memory needs, and is scalable to large datasets. Although it requires high memory, it offers a combination of short training times and the ability to manage high dimensionality. While AE1SVM and AutoEncoder also support tabular data, AE1SVM's weaknesses include lower memory, and AutoEncoder has some strengths redundant with VAE without addressing the need for lower memory, making VAE the more suitable option as it balances the data size and type properties along with the other requirements better than the other models.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is the best choice as it is suitable for tabular data and can handle high-dimensional and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset tag of 'tabular data'. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which matches the 'large' dataset size. Even though it requires high memory, it has a short training time which could compensate for memory usage, making it a viable option despite the requirement for 'low memory'.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is specifically strong with tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which matches well with the 'large' data size and 'tabular data' tags. Despite its high memory requirement being a weakness, LUNAR supports short training times and does not focus on noisy data, which is not a characteristic mentioned in the dataset tags. Overall, it aligns well with the requirement for handling large-scale tabular data efficiently while meeting most of the provided criteria.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and requires a model with low memory usage. VAE supports tabular data, can handle large datasets, and has short training times, which aligns well with the dataset's properties. Despite its high memory weakness, it offers a better advantage over other models since they do not adequately support tabular data or low memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected as it supports tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset tags. Although VAE requires high memory, its short training time and ability to process noisy data make it a suitable choice given the additional requirement of low memory constraints relative to other models listed, as they either have bigger memory requirements or are not suitable for tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is suitable for large, tabular datasets and is scalable to large datasets with short training time, which aligns well with the dataset tag 'large'. Despite using more memory, it is designed to handle high-dimensional tabular data effectively. LUNAR's weaknesses are less critical for the given dataset, making it the most suitable option considering the low memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and has short training time, which is advantageous when dealing with large data sizes. Although it is high memory, it is one of the options that meet the essential requirements, given the available choices. Other models either have critical weaknesses related to the dataset properties, such as supporting low memory or being applicable to tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and large datasets, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Although it requires high memory, it offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Its strengths in dealing with noisy data and high dimensionality are also beneficial. Despite a potential weakness with discrete or categorical data, the alignment with low memory requirements and tabular data makes VAE the most suitable choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for large tabular datasets and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. While it performs well with tabular data, its ability to handle high dimensionality, coupled with a short training time, addresses the dataset’s need for low memory usage. Though VAE requires high memory, which is a slight mismatch, its strengths outweigh this aspect given the dataset's characteristics, making it the best choice from the list.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected due to its strength in handling tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. It is also scalable to large datasets, which is important given the large size of the dataset. Furthermore, LUNAR has a short training time which helps meet the low memory requirement. Despite its high memory usage as a weakness, its scalability and strength in tabular data make it the most suitable choice among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder model is selected because it is well-suited for large, tabular datasets, which matches the dataset characteristics. It has strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which are relevant to the dataset type. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which addresses the requirement for low memory usage. Its weaknesses do not pertain to the significant characteristics or additional requirements of the dataset provided.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational AutoEncoder) is the most suitable model for this scenario because it is designed to handle tabular data and is known for managing large datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. While it may have high memory usage, it compensates with short training times, making it feasible despite the additional low memory constraint. Its strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and short training times further enhance its suitability for the given dataset tags and the model's scalability requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable for large tabular datasets, and it performs well with high dimensionality and noisy data. It also has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Although it requires high memory, which is not a direct match for the 'low memory' requirement, no other models perfectly align while fitting other dataset characteristics. Considering all factors, AutoEncoder strikes a balance between the dataset's needs for tabular data handling, scalability, and training time efficiency.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's properties of being large and tabular. Despite having high memory requirements, VAE offers short training times and can handle high dimensionality, which can be beneficial for complex tabular datasets. Its strengths in handling noisy data also add to its suitability given no explicit need for handling sparse or imbalanced data.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for the given requirements as it works well with tabular data, which is the type of data in the dataset. It is also capable of handling large datasets, addressing the 'large' data size tag. Although the dataset has the 'low memory' constraint, VAE is one of the few models that can manage large datasets with a relatively short training time, making it more efficient memory-wise compared to other models. Despite its high memory demand as a weakness, it has better compatibility with the dataset characteristics compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's requirements. VAE has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, making it suitable for this dataset. While it does have high memory requirements, the model compensates with short training times, which can be managed within the low memory constraint given the scalability and effectiveness in dealing with tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is selected because it explicitly supports tabular data, which is the type of data in this dataset. Additionally, VAE is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it suitable for a large dataset. Even though it requires high memory usage, which is a concern given the additional requirement of low memory, VAE's strength in handling tabular data and scalability are crucial advantages given other models have more critical weaknesses for this context.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for large tabular datasets and is scalable. Although it has high memory requirements, it aligns well with the dataset properties by supporting tabular data and handling large datasets efficiently. It also provides short training times, which is advantageous given the dataset's low memory requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset's properties. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets, addressing the need for low memory use. While it does require high memory, which is a slight concern, it offers short training times, making it a strong candidate for this application compared to other listed models.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large and is tabular, and the AutoEncoder is well-suited for such data types, excelling in handling high dimensionality and noisy data. AutoEncoder also supports GPU processing, which is beneficial given the large data size, and it has a short training time, ensuring efficient processing of extensive datasets. Although it requires high memory, which is a consideration against the low memory requirement, it is more suitable than other models that either do not support tabular data or struggle with large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable choice because it is specifically designed for tabular data, which aligns with the data type tag in the dataset. It is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, addressing the requirement of handling a large dataset efficiently. Importantly, its weaknesses do not affect its capability to handle large tabular datasets with low memory demands, unlike other options which have memory limitations or are not suitable for tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for large tabular datasets, aligning well with the dataset requirements. It can handle high dimensionality and is scalable to large datasets. Despite requiring high memory, which is a weakness, its strengths, such as short training time and compatibility with tabular data, make it the best fit among the available models considering the low memory requirement. Other models either do not support tabular data, are less scalable, or have significant weaknesses that conflict more with the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable for large tabular datasets and handles high dimensionality well, which is a requirement given the dataset's properties. It also scales well to large datasets and has a short training time, which aligns with the need for low memory usage. Despite the general high memory requirement, the efficiency in scalability and the ability to manage large data while operating efficiently make it a suitable choice for this scenario.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type, and it can handle large datasets efficiently. Despite its high memory requirement, it offers a short training time, which can be beneficial when considering large data sizes. While it does have weaknesses in processing sparse and discrete data, these are not mentioned as concerns in the dataset properties. It balances strengths of scalability and applicability to tabular data effectively according to the use case constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it handles tabular data efficiently, is scalable to large datasets, and has a short training time. Despite the dataset's requirement for low memory usage, LUNAR can still be a viable option due to its strengths in handling tabular and large datasets, aligning well with the large data size requirement. Additionally, its ability to process imbalanced and sparse data in tabular formats makes it a good fit, compensating somewhat for the low memory concern.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable due to its ability to handle large tabular datasets efficiently while also offering short training time. Although it requires high memory, which conflicts slightly with low memory requirement, it is the best compromise given it supports tabular data and large datasets. Other models either lack the capability to handle tabular data or have critical weaknesses like low scalability or high memory requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it supports tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which fits well with the 'large' and 'tabular data' dataset tags. Additionally, it has a short training time and is efficient with GPU, helping overcome memory constraints, making it a suitable option given the 'low memory' requirement of the dataset. Its strength in handling high dimensionality and noisy data also aligns with the requirements, despite these not being explicitly specified in the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset properties indicate tabular data with a large size requirement and the need for low memory usage. Among the models listed, the AutoEncoder has strengths in handling tabular data and is scalable to large datasets. Although it generally requires high memory, its short training time makes it the most suitable choice given the options. Other models either do not support tabular data effectively, have limited scalability, or require more complex memory and computational resources.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is highly suitable as it supports tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset tags. Its ability to handle high-dimensionality and noisy data is beneficial. The main weakness of requiring high memory is partially contraindicated by the 'low memory' requirement of the dataset, however, among the available models, it provides the closest fit to the requirements while minimizing weaknesses impacting performance on large tabular datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable for large tabular datasets, which match the dataset properties. It handles high-dimensional and noisy data efficiently, utilizes GPU for better performance, and offers scalability to large datasets. While it requires high memory, which is a weakness given the 'low memory' requirement, it overall meets the dataset needs better than others. Most of the other models either do not support tabular data well or have significant limitations like low scalability or incompatibility with large datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality. It handles noisy data efficiently, supports scalable learning with a GPU, and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset's large data size tag and tabular data type. Despite its high memory requirement, its other strengths match the needs of accommodating a large dataset, and it has a short training time, which is beneficial when considering low memory constraints. Other models with strengths in tabular data either have more constraints with memory or less efficiency handling large datasets or specific weaknesses that do not align well with the dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a suitable choice for this scenario as it supports tabular data and is scalable to large datasets. While it does require high memory, it offers a short training time and effectively handles large tabular datasets due to its strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data. These properties align well with the dataset requirements, except for the low memory constraint, but it best matches the overall needs compared to other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for large datasets and works well with tabular data, which matches the dataset's properties. While it has high memory requirements, so do most models, but VAE avoids specific disadvantages like long training time and limited scalability seen in others. Its ability to manage high dimensionality and noisy data is an added advantage given the dataset characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a suitable choice for large tabular datasets, which matches the dataset properties given. VAE can handle high dimensionality and noisy data well, which is often a characteristic of large datasets. Additionally, it has a strength in working with tabular data, making it appropriate for the dataset type. Though VAE is high in memory usage, it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, aligning with the need for low memory requirements given the other model options.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also scalable to large datasets, aligning with the dataset's large size. Although it requires high memory, which is not ideal for low memory requirements, it offers short training times and performs well with high-dimensional and noisy data. Other models like VAE and ALAD also support tabular data but present similar memory requirements or have other weaknesses that are less ideal for the dataset characteristics. Therefore, despite the memory consideration, AutoEncoder offers the best overall alignment with the dataset properties among the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular, large datasets and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset properties. It also supports low memory consumption which meets the additional requirement specified. While it has minor weaknesses like hyperparameter sensitivity, those are less impactful compared to its strengths. Other models like AE1SVM and AutoEncoder have weaknesses such as low memory effectiveness that are critical for the given dataset requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is a large tabular dataset with a requirement for low memory usage. Among the models listed, LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and can handle large datasets efficiently. It also has a short training time, which accommodates the low memory requirement. While ALAD and AutoEncoder are also good for tabular data and large datasets, they typically require high memory, making LUNAR a more suitable choice given the additional low memory constraint.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and is scalable to large datasets, which suits the dataset size. Although it has a high memory usage, it has a short training time, making it a potentially good fit despite the low memory requirement. Other models either do not handle tabular data effectively or face other significant weakness issues, especially with low memory and long training times, making VAE the most suitable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large, tabular, and has low memory requirements. The AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data, is scalable to large datasets, and has a short training time, which is advantageous given the low memory requirement. Although it requires high memory, its capability to handle large datasets and tabular data outweighs this when considering the available model options.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this large tabular dataset with additional requirements for low memory consumption. It excels in handling tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which is crucial given the dataset size. While AutoEncoder typically requires high memory, the low memory requirement is the only significant mismatch. Other models like AE1SVM, ALAD, and LUNAR also cater to large tabular datasets, but AutoEncoder has fewer weaknesses contradictory to the dataset's needs, making it the most balanced choice.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is best suited for large tabular datasets, which matches the provided dataset properties. Moreover, it is designed to work with low memory requirements and has a short training time, both of which align well with the additional requirements. Despite its computational intensity, its capabilities in handling large, tabular, and imbalanced datasets make it the most appropriate choice given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The LUNAR model is chosen because it supports tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset properties. It is also noted for having short training times and being relatively efficient with regard to memory, which aligns with the additional requirement for low memory usage. Despite weaknesses in memory sensitivity, its strengths in dealing with imbalanced and sparse data, along with compatibility with GPUs, make it a suitable choice for the dataset's requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large and consists of tabular data with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is suitable for large datasets and works well with tabular data. While VAE typically requires high memory, it can handle large datasets and provides a balance in terms of short training time. Given the available models, VAE aligns most closely with the dataset characteristics, despite the need for careful memory management.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for the given dataset as it handles tabular data effectively, which is one of the strengths required for this dataset type. The dataset is large, and VAE can scale well with large datasets. While it has high memory requirements, it meets the criteria for low memory better than other models in the list as they face various issues with either scalability or are not optimal for tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: AutoEncoder is selected as it is well-suited for tabular data, can handle large datasets, and performs well with high dimensionality and noisy data. Despite its weaknesses with imbalanced data and the need for high memory, its scalability and compatibility with the dataset characteristics make it the most appropriate choice given the low memory requirement and dataset properties.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: AutoEncoder\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The AutoEncoder is suitable for 'large' tabular datasets, as it can handle 'tabular data' effectively and is 'scalable to large datasets'. It also has 'high dimensionality' support and a 'short training time', making it a good fit for large datasets. While it does require 'high memory', it does not have 'low memory' as a weakness like some other models. Moreover, the AutoEncoder can handle 'noisy data', which can be beneficial depending on the dataset's characteristics. Overall, it balances the strengths needed for the given dataset requirements while minimizing weaknesses.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: LUNAR\n", + "Reason to choose this model: LUNAR is selected because it is suitable for tabular data and can handle large datasets efficiently, matching the dataset properties. Although it requires high memory and is computationally intensive, it does support low memory usage better than many other options. Additionally, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets and offers short training time, which aligns with the requirements of the provided dataset tags.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset is large and consists of tabular data with a low memory requirement. VAE is well-suited for large datasets and tabular data, making it a compatible choice. Although it requires high memory, it also offers a short training time and can handle noisy data and high dimensionality, which suits the potential dataset needs. Other models like AnoGAN and DevNet are less suited due to their weaknesses with tabular data and higher memory requirements, respectively.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Current dataset: vertebral\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "Repeat: 1\n", + "{\n", + " \"data_size\": [\"small\"],\n", + " \"data_type\": [\"tabular data\"],\n", + " \"domain\": [\"others\"],\n", + " \"characteristics\": [\"noisy data\", \"low-signal data\"],\n", + " \"additional_requirements\": [\"low memory\"]\n", + "}\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for the given dataset as it performs well on 'tabular data' and handles 'noisy data' effectively, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Despite the requirement for 'low memory', VAE's strengths in handling 'small' and 'low-signal data' outweigh its weakness of high memory usage, making it the best trade-off among available models.\n", + "Repeat: 2\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for the given dataset characteristics. It handles tabular and noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset tags. Although it requires high memory, the short training time and capability to handle small datasets make it a good fit for datasets with low memory requirements. The VAE's strengths in handling high dimensionality and its scalability align well with the characteristics of the dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 3\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) model is best suited for tabular data with noisy and low-signal characteristics while maintaining a requirement for low memory use. It handles noisy data effectively and is designed to work with smaller datasets, unlike most other models in the list that are less suitable for small data sizes. Although VAE typically requires high memory, given the dataset tags require low memory, VAE fits better than alternatives when taking all factors into consideration. Other potential models either struggle with small datasets, like AE1SVM and ALAD, or lack compatibility with tabular data, as is the case with models like AnoGAN.\n", + "Repeat: 4\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it performs well on tabular and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset tags indicating noisy tabular data. While VAE might not be ideal for small data sizes, it handles noisy data effectively and requires low memory, which is important given the additional requirements specified. Although it needs high memory and a large dataset for optimal performance, the short training time and ability to handle low-signal data give it an edge over other models in the list under these conditions.\n", + "Repeat: 5\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is chosen because it handles tabular data efficiently which matches the dataset type. VAE is also strong in dealing with noisy data, a significant characteristic of the dataset. Furthermore, it has a short training time, which aligns with the low memory requirement of the dataset despite having high memory consumption overall. Other models either struggle with tabular data, noisy data, or small dataset sizes. VAE provides the best balance of strengths for the given dataset's characteristics.\n", + "Repeat: 6\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset's properties. It is strong in handling tabular data and performs well with noisy data, making it fit well with the dataset characteristics. Furthermore, the VAE model has a short training time and can accommodate large datasets, which supports the low memory requirement. Though it may struggle with discrete or categorical data, this does not conflict with the dataset tags provided. Therefore, despite being resource-intensive, it aligns better with the dataset's characteristics than other options.\n", + "Repeat: 7\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is most suitable because it addresses several key aspects of the dataset: it works well with tabular data, handles noisy data effectively, and supports higher dimensionality, which can help extract more detailed information even from low-signal data. Although it might typically require higher memory, its strengths in handling small datasets, short training time, and capability with noisy data make it the most aligned option for dealing with the dataset characteristics identified.\n", + "Repeat: 8\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it is strong in handling tabular data, noisy data, and has a short training time, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics such as tabular, noisy data, and requirement for low memory use due to its short training time. While it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced datasets, these do not heavily impair its performance in this scenario. This choice balances the dataset properties with the model's ability to effectively generalize on small datasets while managing noise in the data.\n", + "Repeat: 9\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is chosen due to its strengths in handling tabular and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is also capable of operating with low-signal data, making it suitable despite the small dataset size. Moreover, VAE is optimized for GPU, offers short training times, and does not require high memory, matching the additional requirement of low memory usage. Although it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, these are less concerning given the compatibility with the other dataset attributes.\n", + "Repeat: 10\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable as it supports tabular data and performs well with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset tags. Although it requires high memory, the strength in handling small datasets with noisy characteristics compensates for this. It also has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory requirement. Despite its weaknesses in dealing with discrete data or imbalanced data, these are not critical factors in this selection context.\n", + "Repeat: 11\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is well-suited for small tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite its need for high memory, it is the most compatible model considering the strengths relevant to tabular and noisy data while accommodating relatively low-dimensionality. Other models either struggle with small data sizes or are less effective with noisy tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 12\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is chosen because it is the most suitable model for the given dataset tags. It supports tabular data and can handle noisy data effectively, which corresponds well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, the requirement for low memory is the only major challenge, but compared to alternatives, VAE is still preferable since alternatives have larger and more critical mismatches. VAE also has a short training time and is designed to work with small datasets efficiently within reasonable memory limits.\n", + "Repeat: 13\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is best suited for the given dataset as it supports tabular and noisy data and is adaptable to small data sizes. While it is not explicitly optimized for low memory usage, its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy environments, as well as its capability for short training times, make it the most compatible option from the provided list. The model can process high-dimensional data, which complements the low-signal characteristic of the dataset, despite the low-memory constraint.\n", + "Repeat: 14\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it handles tabular and noisy data well, which aligns with the characteristics of the dataset. It is also appropriate for low-signal data and requires low memory and short training time, which match the additional dataset requirements. Despite not being optimal for discrete or categorical data, VAE's overall compatibility with the dataset's properties makes it the most suitable choice from the list provided.\n", + "Repeat: 15\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model supports tabular data and performs well with noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it has a short training time, which is beneficial given the 'low memory' requirement. While VAE is typically better for larger datasets, it is the most aligned option given the need for handling noisy, low-signal, small-sized tabular data among the available models.\n", + "Repeat: 16\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset's characteristics. It supports tabular data and performs well in noisy data environments, which aligns with the dataset tags. Although it requires high memory, it offers short training time, which is beneficial considering the 'low memory' requirement in comparison to the other models. Additionally, it can handle high-dimensionality data which might be useful for distinguishing low-signal features.\n", + "Repeat: 17\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and handles noisy data well, which aligns with the dataset properties. Despite requiring high memory, which is a weakness, other models from the list have incompatible weaknesses such as poor performance on small datasets or not handling low-signal data effectively. VAE's ability to work with small datasets and tabular data makes it the best fit among the available options.\n", + "Repeat: 18\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It handles tabular data and noisy data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Although it has a weakness with low-signal data, its overall strength with noisy and high-dimensional data, combined with its compatibility with tabular data, makes it the best fit among the options. Furthermore, its short training time and scalability are advantageous for low-memory environments, which are also requirements for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 19\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and model analyses. It is strong for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles noisy data well, which is a characteristic of the dataset, and it can operate efficiently with low memory, satisfying the additional requirement. Moreover, VAE also benefits from a short training time suitable for small data sizes. Although not perfectly attuned to low-signal data, it handles the major constraints of the dataset better than other models in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 20\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE is selected because it handles tabular data well and is designed to work with noisy data, both of which are characteristics of the given dataset. Although the dataset is small, VAE compensates by being able to operate efficiently on high-dimensionality and noisy datasets which aligns well with the needs of this particular dataset. Despite the limitation on memory, VAE's strengths in handling noisy and tabular data make it a suitable choice compared to the other models which either lack support for tabular data or have significant weaknesses regarding noisy or small datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 21\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, despite its weaknesses with small data sizes, it is capable of handling noisy data which is a characteristic of our dataset. It can operate with high memory requirements, which might not be optimal for low memory, but it offers short training times. While not perfect, it matches better than others given the strengths and weaknesses of the other models listed.\n", + "Repeat: 22\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It handles tabular and noisy data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. VAE's ability to deal with high-dimensionality and to use GPUs for acceleration also complements the dataset's need for handling noisy data. Although VAE may require a GPU and higher memory, it is still preferable given the requirement for a model that can handle noisy, low-signal data effectively, compared to others in the list which are not optimal for small data sizes or have weaknesses with noisy or low-signal data.\n", + "Repeat: 23\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable choice because it is effective with tabular data and can handle noisy data well, which aligns with the dataset properties. Even though the dataset is small, which is a weakness for VAE, other models have more significant weaknesses related to tabular data or low memory requirements. Additionally, VAE supports low memory usage better than alternatives, making it a more feasible option for this dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 24\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable option because it supports tabular data and is effective on noisy data, aligning well with the dataset's properties. While it leverages GPU and has high memory usage, its efficiency on tabular and noisy data, combined with a short training time, makes it the best candidate despite the small data size. All other models had significant weaknesses specific to either small data size, tabular data, or noisy data, making them less suitable for this dataset's constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 25\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen as the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, handles noisy data well, and has the ability to work with low-signal data while maintaining a short training time. Although it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and requires high memory, its strengths in handling tabular and noisy data align well with the dataset characteristics. The ability to scale to larger datasets and manage high dimensionality makes it a robust choice for this use case, particularly given the small data size requirement.\n", + "Repeat: 26\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable for handling small, tabular, noisy datasets, which aligns with our dataset's characteristics. It is good for tabular and noisy data, has a short training time, and can manage high dimensionality, which may help in extracting useful features from the low-signal data. Despite its requirement for high memory, it fulfills the low memory requirement better than other candidates and supports the data type without having significant weaknesses for small data as seen in alternatives such as AnoGAN or MO-GAAL.\n", + "Repeat: 27\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model considering the dataset properties and model characteristics. VAE is strong in handling tabular data and noisy data, which is important given the characteristics of the dataset. Although VAE generally requires high memory, it handles noisy data effectively and supports tabular data, aligning well with the dataset's requirements. Furthermore, VAE has a short training time, which is advantageous for low-memory scenarios, making it the best compromise amongst the models available.\n", + "Repeat: 28\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it supports tabular data and is effective with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It handles small datasets well compared to the other available models, and its short training time is beneficial given the low memory requirement. While other models have strengths in specific areas, VAE's ability to handle the dataset type and characteristics makes it the most suitable choice.\n", + "Repeat: 29\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen as it supports tabular data and performs well with noisy data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Despite the small data size, VAE's strength in handling noisy data and efficient training time are beneficial. The low memory requirement is not ideal for VAE, but other models have more incompatible traits for this dataset, such as handling small data sizes or having strong negative tendencies towards noisy data.\n", + "Repeat: 30\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and performs well on noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Although it may require higher memory, which is a slight mismatch with the 'low memory' requirement, it provides short training time and is capable of handling high dimensionality. VAE also supports small datasets better than many other models listed, making it the most balanced choice for this scenario despite its limitations with categorical data.\n", + "Repeat: 31\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and is effective with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also has a short training time requirement which is beneficial for handling small datasets efficiently. While it requires high memory, it is more suitable compared to other options that struggle with small or low-signal datasets, aligning better with the need for low-signal data handling.\n", + "Repeat: 32\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected as it can handle tabular and noisy data while being efficient with small datasets. Despite its high memory usage, it compensates with short training times and scalability. This aligns well with the dataset's characteristics of low memory requirement and noisy, low-signal data, while avoiding severe weaknesses of other models with small datasets and tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 33\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for the dataset as it handles tabular data and noisy data well, which matches the dataset characteristics. Although it typically requires high memory, it offers short training times suitable for small datasets. VAE's ability to process high-dimensional data also aligns with potential data complexity, making it the best choice considering the limitations of other models for small, low-signal, noisy tabular datasets.\n", + "Repeat: 34\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The dataset consists of small, tabular data with noise and low signal, requiring a model that can handle such characteristics efficiently under low memory constraints. VAE is strong with tabular and noisy data, suitable for handling high dimensionality and has a short training time. Its weaknesses are mostly related to discrete or categorical data and balancing issues, which are less relevant here. Thus, VAE is the most appropriate choice given its ability to deal with noisy data and tabular format within this context.\n", + "Repeat: 35\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the best choice as it handles tabular and noisy data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it operates efficiently on small datasets while requiring low memory, overcoming the primary weaknesses of other models in handling small, low-signal datasets with noise. Despite the model's high memory requirement, it is most aligned with the need for handling noisy and tabular data effectively.\n", + "Repeat: 36\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is a good fit for small tabular datasets with noisy data, which matches the dataset properties provided. While VAE does have weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and may require GPU and high memory, it specifically handles noisy data well and is applicable to tabular data, even though it is not inherently minimalistic in memory usage. Considering the dataset's requirement for handling noise and the taboo of small data size refuted by other options, VAE stands out as a preferred model from the provided list.\n", + "Repeat: 37\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is chosen because it supports tabular data and performs well with noisy data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it is designed to work efficiently on small datasets and has a short training time. Despite its need for high memory, which is a minor mismatch, it is the best available option given the requirement for models that handle low-signal data well.\n", + "Repeat: 38\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it handles tabular data well and is robust to noisy data, which aligns with the dataset properties of 'tabular data' and 'noisy data'. Despite the dataset being small, VAE is preferred because it has strengths in managing high dimensionality and noisy data efficiently, offering a good balance of suitability for the low-signal data with low memory requirements. It also has a short training time, which is beneficial in a scenario with a small dataset and low memory constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 39\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset because it supports tabular data and is effective with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it has a short training time, which is advantageous for handling small data sizes, though it requires high memory. While other models may also deal with noisy data, VAE's combination of strengths in working with tabular data and handling noise makes it a more suitable choice for this scenario compared to others in the model list.\n", + "Repeat: 40\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model because it handles tabular data and noisy data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Despite its weakness with small data sizes and low-signal data, it offers short training time and can be tailored with hyperparameter tuning to adapt to the data size. Additionally, while VAE typically requires high memory, its tabular data strength and short training time make it a viable choice considering the dataset's low memory requirement compared to other models.\n", + "Repeat: 41\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and effectively handles noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, VAE has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which is beneficial for expanding beyond the current small dataset size. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, these do not impact the current dataset as no such tags were mentioned, and the model requires high memory which fits within the given low-memory constraint only for training but not runtime, making it a viable option.\n", + "Repeat: 42\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this scenario due to its strength in handling tabular data, noisy data, and operating on small datasets. It also has the capability to effectively manage high dimensionality, which can be beneficial given the 'low-signal data' characteristic of the dataset. While it does require high memory, it compensates with a short training time, making it suitable for your low memory requirement. Other models either struggle with small datasets or are less ideal for tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 43\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it handles tabular data and noisy data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it requires low memory and has a short training time, making it suitable for a small dataset with low-signal properties. While it has a high memory requirement in full capacity, its strengths align well with the dataset features compared to others in the list.\n", + "Repeat: 44\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is suitable for small tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Although VAE is not ideal for low-signal data, it handles noisy data and tabular data effectively compared to other options. It also requires low memory and has a short training time, matching the dataset's additional requirements.\n", + "Repeat: 45\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The VAE model is suitable for small, tabular data with noisy and low-signal characteristics, which are key attributes of the dataset. Despite its weakness with discrete or categorical data, VAE handles tabular and noisy data well, is efficient in terms of memory and training time, making it a good fit for low-memory requirements. Other models like AnoGAN and DevNet are less suitable due to poor performance on small datasets and tabular data.\n", + "Repeat: 46\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for this scenario due to its strengths in handling tabular and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite its high memory requirement, it offers short training times and effectively manages high dimensionality, making it a good fit for low-signal data. Additionally, it supports scalability, which is a provision for potential dataset growth, and its strengths in managing noisy data help address noise in the current dataset.\n", + "Repeat: 47\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data and performs well on noisy data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Though it has a weakness with low memory requirements, other models such as LUNAR and Deep SVDD are not suited due to their weaknesses with noisy data, a key characteristic of the dataset. VAE outperforms others in handling tabular, noisy data combined, despite the dataset's small size.\n", + "Repeat: 48\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is the most suitable model for this scenario as it supports tabular data, can effectively handle noisy data, which is a characteristic of the dataset, and has a short training time that meets the low memory requirement. While the dataset is small, the ability of VAE to work with noisy data helps mitigate this issue better than other models listed, given the constraints.\n", + "Repeat: 49\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it is one of the models that handles tabular data and noisy data well, which aligns with the dataset properties. Although it typically requires high memory, it has short training time and is suitable for small datasets, making it a good fit for low memory requirements when optimized properly.\n", + "Repeat: 50\n", + "The top model is: VAE\n", + "Reason to choose this model: VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and is capable of handling noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, these do not contradict the current dataset tags. Additionally, VAE is known for short training times and scalability, which can be beneficial even with the requirement for low memory usage. Other models either have more critical weaknesses relative to the dataset requirements or do not support tabular data as effectively.\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "\n" + ] + } + ], + "source": [ + "select_model_datasets(repeat=50)" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 29, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "name": "stdout", + "output_type": "stream", + "text": [ + "Loaded results for condition 'output'\n", + "\n", + "Condition: output\n", + "Model recommendation counts:\n", + " MO-GAAL: 0\n", + " AutoEncoder: 155\n", + " SO-GAAL: 30\n", + " VAE: 385\n", + " AnoGAN: 0\n", + " Deep SVDD: 1\n", + " ALAD: 19\n", + " AE1SVM: 60\n", + " DevNet: 0\n", + " LUNAR: 200\n" + ] + }, + { + "data": { + "image/png": "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", + "text/plain": [ + "
" + ] + }, + "metadata": {}, + "output_type": "display_data" + }, + { + "name": "stdout", + "output_type": "stream", + "text": [ + "pima\n", + "tops: ['AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'DeepSVDD', 'AnoGAN', 'VAE']\n", + "selected: ['LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'ALAD', 'LUNAR', 'ALAD', 'VAE', 'ALAD', 'ALAD', 'LUNAR', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'ALAD', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'AE1SVM']\n", + "cardio\n", + "tops: ['VAE', 'DeepSVDD', 'AE1SVM', 'AnoGAN', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "selected: ['LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'AE1SVM', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'LUNAR', 'SO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL']\n", + "mnist\n", + "tops: ['VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'DeepSVDD']\n", + "selected: ['AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'ALAD', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "arrhythmia\n", + "tops: ['LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AnoGAN']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'ALAD', 'ALAD', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'ALAD', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'ALAD', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'ALAD', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "pendigits\n", + "tops: ['VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AnoGAN', 'DeepSVDD', 'MO-GAAL']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR']\n", + "shuttle\n", + "tops: ['VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'DeepSVDD', 'AE1SVM', 'AnoGAN']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE']\n", + "letter\n", + "tops: ['LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'DevNet', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE']\n", + "musk\n", + "tops: ['VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'DevNet', 'DeepSVDD', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "selected: ['AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'Deep SVDD', 'AE1SVM']\n", + "vowels\n", + "tops: ['LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'DevNet', 'VAE']\n", + "selected: ['LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR']\n", + "optdigits\n", + "tops: ['AnoGAN', 'DevNet', 'MO-GAAL', 'DeepSVDD', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "selected: ['AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'ALAD', 'AutoEncoder', 'ALAD', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'ALAD', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "satellite\n", + "tops: ['AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'AnoGAN', 'MO-GAAL', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE']\n", + "lympho\n", + "tops: ['AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AnoGAN', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR']\n", + "selected: ['LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE']\n", + "ionosphere\n", + "tops: ['LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'DeepSVDD']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "wbc\n", + "tops: ['AutoEncoder', 'AnoGAN', 'AE1SVM', 'VAE', 'DeepSVDD']\n", + "selected: ['LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'AE1SVM', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR']\n", + "glass\n", + "tops: ['LUNAR', 'AE1SVM', 'AnoGAN', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder']\n", + "selected: ['LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE']\n", + "satimage-2\n", + "tops: ['VAE', 'AE1SVM', 'MO-GAAL', 'AnoGAN', 'DeepSVDD']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'LUNAR', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'AutoEncoder', 'AutoEncoder', 'LUNAR', 'VAE']\n", + "vertebral\n", + "tops: ['AnoGAN', 'SO-GAAL', 'DevNet', 'MO-GAAL', 'ALAD']\n", + "selected: ['VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE', 'VAE']\n", + "\n", + "Overall Accuracy: 0.72\n", + "\n", + "LLM's Selection Accuracy per Dataset:\n", + "pima: 27 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.54\n", + "cardio: 1 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.02\n", + "mnist: 49 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.98\n", + "arrhythmia: 45 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.90\n", + "pendigits: 34 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.68\n", + "shuttle: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "letter: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "musk: 49 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.98\n", + "vowels: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "optdigits: 27 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.54\n", + "satellite: 42 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.84\n", + "lympho: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "ionosphere: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "wbc: 14 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.28\n", + "glass: 50 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 1.00\n", + "satimage-2: 22 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.44\n", + "vertebral: 0 out of 50 correct, Accuracy: 0.00\n" + ] + }, + { + "data": { + "image/png": "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", + "text/plain": [ + "
" + ] + }, + "metadata": {}, + "output_type": "display_data" + } + ], + "source": [ + "import pandas as pd\n", + "import json\n", + "import os\n", + "\n", + "prn_df = pd.read_csv('prn_df.csv')\n", + "roc_df = pd.read_csv('roc_df.csv')\n", + "time_df = pd.read_csv('time_df.csv')\n", + "\n", + "def load_experiment_results(results_dir='without_note_selection_results'):\n", + " experiment_results = {}\n", + " result_files = [f for f in os.listdir(results_dir) if f.endswith('.json')]\n", + " \n", + " for result_file in result_files:\n", + " condition = os.path.splitext(result_file)[0]\n", + " file_path = os.path.join(results_dir, result_file)\n", + " with open(file_path, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:\n", + " data = json.load(f)\n", + " experiment_results[condition] = data\n", + " print(f\"Loaded results for condition '{condition}'\")\n", + " \n", + " return experiment_results\n", + "\n", + "experiment_results = load_experiment_results()\n", + "import re\n", + "from collections import Counter\n", + "import numpy as np\n", + "import pandas as pd\n", + "import matplotlib.pyplot as plt\n", + "\n", + "model_list = ['MO-GAAL', 'AutoEncoder', 'SO-GAAL', 'VAE', 'AnoGAN', 'Deep SVDD', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'DevNet', 'LUNAR']\n", + "\n", + "for condition, results in experiment_results.items():\n", + " print(f\"\\nCondition: {condition}\")\n", + " model_counter = Counter()\n", + " for dataset_name, responses in results.items():\n", + " for response in responses:\n", + " answer = response['selected_model']\n", + " cleaned_answer = re.sub(r'[^a-zA-Z\\s]', '', answer)\n", + " cleaned_answer_upper = cleaned_answer.upper()\n", + " for model in model_list:\n", + " model_cleaned = re.sub(r'[^a-zA-Z]', '', model).upper()\n", + " if model_cleaned in cleaned_answer_upper.replace(' ', ''):\n", + " model_counter[model] += 1\n", + " print(\"Model recommendation counts:\")\n", + " for model in model_list:\n", + " count = model_counter.get(model, 0)\n", + " print(f\" {model}: {count}\")\n", + " \n", + " models = model_list\n", + " counts = [model_counter.get(model, 0) for model in models]\n", + "\n", + "top_n = 5\n", + "# Extract the list of model columns\n", + "model_columns = roc_df.columns[4:] \n", + "top5_models_per_dataset = {}\n", + "\n", + "for index, row in roc_df.iterrows():\n", + " dataset = row['Data']\n", + " # Get the ROC values for the models\n", + " model_scores = row[model_columns]\n", + " # Sort the models based on ROC values in descending order\n", + " top5_models = model_scores.sort_values(ascending=False).head(top_n + 1).index.tolist()\n", + " top5_models.remove('Outlier Perc')\n", + " top5_models_per_dataset[dataset] = top5_models\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "llm_selected_models = experiment_results['output']\n", + "\n", + "# Extract the selected models for each dataset\n", + "selected_models_per_dataset = {}\n", + "\n", + "for dataset, selections in llm_selected_models.items():\n", + " selected_models = [entry['selected_model'] for entry in selections]\n", + " selected_models_per_dataset[dataset] = selected_models\n", + "\n", + "# Evaluate accuracy\n", + "correct_counts = {}\n", + "total_correct = 0\n", + "total_selections = 0\n", + "\n", + "for dataset, selected_models in selected_models_per_dataset.items():\n", + " top5 = top5_models_per_dataset.get(dataset, [])\n", + " print(dataset)\n", + " print(\"tops:\", top5)\n", + " print('selected: ', selected_models)\n", + " correct = sum([1 for model in selected_models if model in top5])\n", + " total = len(selected_models)\n", + " accuracy = correct / total if total > 0 else 0\n", + " correct_counts[dataset] = {'correct': correct, 'total': total, 'accuracy': accuracy}\n", + " # Accumulate total correct and total selections\n", + " total_correct += correct\n", + " total_selections += total\n", + "\n", + "# Calculate overall accuracy\n", + "overall_accuracy = total_correct / total_selections if total_selections > 0 else 0\n", + "print(f\"\\nOverall Accuracy: {overall_accuracy:.2f}\")\n", + "\n", + "# Display the evaluation results per dataset\n", + "print(\"\\nLLM's Selection Accuracy per Dataset:\")\n", + "for dataset, counts in correct_counts.items():\n", + " print(f\"{dataset}: {counts['correct']} out of {counts['total']} correct, Accuracy: {counts['accuracy']:.2f}\")\n", + "\n", + "# Step 4: Visualize the Results\n", + "\n", + "accuracy_df = pd.DataFrame.from_dict(correct_counts, orient='index')\n", + "accuracy_df.reset_index(inplace=True)\n", + "accuracy_df.rename(columns={'index': 'Dataset'}, inplace=True)\n", + "overall_row = pd.DataFrame({\n", + " 'Dataset': ['Overall'],\n", + " 'correct': [total_correct],\n", + " 'total': [total_selections],\n", + " 'accuracy': [overall_accuracy]\n", + "})\n", + "accuracy_df = pd.concat([accuracy_df, overall_row], ignore_index=True)\n", + "plt.figure(figsize=(14, 6))\n", + "bars = plt.bar(accuracy_df['Dataset'], accuracy_df['accuracy'])\n", + "plt.xlabel('Dataset')\n", + "plt.ylabel('Accuracy')\n", + "plt.title('LLM Model Selection Accuracy per Dataset')\n", + "plt.xticks(rotation=45)\n", + "plt.ylim(0, 1)\n", + "plt.grid(axis='y')\n", + "\n", + "# Add accuracy labels on top of each bar\n", + "for bar, acc in zip(bars, accuracy_df['accuracy']):\n", + " yval = bar.get_height()\n", + " plt.text(bar.get_x() + bar.get_width()/2.0, yval + 0.02, f'{acc:.2f}', ha='center', va='bottom')\n", + "\n", + "plt.tight_layout()\n", + "plt.show()\n" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "markdown", + "metadata": {}, + "source": [ + "### Baseline\n", + "- avg performamce of all models on each datset \n", + "- mode model of each dataset selected by autoselector's performance (with note)\n", + "- mode model of each dataset selected by autoselector's performance(without note)\n", + "- autoencoder\n", + "- lunar\n" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 66, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "data": { + "text/html": [ + "
\n", + "\n", + "\n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + "
Unnamed: 0Data#Samples# DimensionsOutlier PercMO-GAALSO-GAALAutoEncoderVAEAnoGANDeepSVDDALADAE1SVMDevNetLUNARAverage_Performance
00arrhythmia45227414.60180.61600.56610.81160.81760.79460.75540.42320.81760.21100.82840.66415
10cardio1831219.61220.56030.72550.78470.96150.80040.93400.60250.91250.05030.57040.69021
20glass21494.20560.42470.39750.59010.60990.67650.40000.26670.68640.55800.79260.54024
30ionosphere3513335.89740.67510.59080.78510.76750.66000.75350.50460.77300.68280.91560.71080
40letter1600326.25000.34890.30740.80870.58840.52230.51330.48110.58830.69910.90570.57632
50lympho148184.05410.52630.39180.98250.98250.98250.84210.63740.96490.02340.93570.72691
60mnist76031009.20690.61220.69260.85670.90020.66880.72070.47860.87210.40000.74110.69430
70musk30621663.16790.56860.43880.88531.00000.80600.95050.37721.00000.99870.76660.77917
80optdigits5216642.87580.65520.46410.51240.50740.81590.51990.49400.44550.70330.48360.56013
90pendigits6870162.27070.69740.51140.66870.92730.84920.78240.56900.90970.10470.69730.67171
100pima768834.89580.29150.25930.71890.61120.64030.67130.54370.60130.35650.71770.54117
110satellite64353631.63950.67420.56790.64310.74190.72410.58390.50140.75220.54240.61790.63490
120satimage-25803361.22350.96930.87970.86840.99480.96670.96670.58480.99220.80400.81610.88427
130shuttle4909797.15110.90850.70120.99390.99470.98660.99350.64900.99000.09750.64100.79559
140vertebral240612.50000.54090.65240.32400.41720.68380.25870.48690.44340.59760.25520.46601
150vowels1456123.43410.18790.33730.93050.74890.51530.66940.34230.76260.75910.94600.61993
160wbc378305.55560.06200.13100.95560.92180.94370.91970.44080.92960.09010.90420.62985
\n", + "
" + ], + "text/plain": [ + " Unnamed: 0 Data #Samples # Dimensions Outlier Perc MO-GAAL \\\n", + "0 0 arrhythmia 452 274 14.6018 0.6160 \n", + "1 0 cardio 1831 21 9.6122 0.5603 \n", + "2 0 glass 214 9 4.2056 0.4247 \n", + "3 0 ionosphere 351 33 35.8974 0.6751 \n", + "4 0 letter 1600 32 6.2500 0.3489 \n", + "5 0 lympho 148 18 4.0541 0.5263 \n", + "6 0 mnist 7603 100 9.2069 0.6122 \n", + "7 0 musk 3062 166 3.1679 0.5686 \n", + "8 0 optdigits 5216 64 2.8758 0.6552 \n", + "9 0 pendigits 6870 16 2.2707 0.6974 \n", + "10 0 pima 768 8 34.8958 0.2915 \n", + "11 0 satellite 6435 36 31.6395 0.6742 \n", + "12 0 satimage-2 5803 36 1.2235 0.9693 \n", + "13 0 shuttle 49097 9 7.1511 0.9085 \n", + "14 0 vertebral 240 6 12.5000 0.5409 \n", + "15 0 vowels 1456 12 3.4341 0.1879 \n", + "16 0 wbc 378 30 5.5556 0.0620 \n", + "\n", + " SO-GAAL AutoEncoder VAE AnoGAN DeepSVDD ALAD AE1SVM DevNet \\\n", + "0 0.5661 0.8116 0.8176 0.7946 0.7554 0.4232 0.8176 0.2110 \n", + "1 0.7255 0.7847 0.9615 0.8004 0.9340 0.6025 0.9125 0.0503 \n", + "2 0.3975 0.5901 0.6099 0.6765 0.4000 0.2667 0.6864 0.5580 \n", + "3 0.5908 0.7851 0.7675 0.6600 0.7535 0.5046 0.7730 0.6828 \n", + "4 0.3074 0.8087 0.5884 0.5223 0.5133 0.4811 0.5883 0.6991 \n", + "5 0.3918 0.9825 0.9825 0.9825 0.8421 0.6374 0.9649 0.0234 \n", + "6 0.6926 0.8567 0.9002 0.6688 0.7207 0.4786 0.8721 0.4000 \n", + "7 0.4388 0.8853 1.0000 0.8060 0.9505 0.3772 1.0000 0.9987 \n", + "8 0.4641 0.5124 0.5074 0.8159 0.5199 0.4940 0.4455 0.7033 \n", + "9 0.5114 0.6687 0.9273 0.8492 0.7824 0.5690 0.9097 0.1047 \n", + "10 0.2593 0.7189 0.6112 0.6403 0.6713 0.5437 0.6013 0.3565 \n", + "11 0.5679 0.6431 0.7419 0.7241 0.5839 0.5014 0.7522 0.5424 \n", + "12 0.8797 0.8684 0.9948 0.9667 0.9667 0.5848 0.9922 0.8040 \n", + "13 0.7012 0.9939 0.9947 0.9866 0.9935 0.6490 0.9900 0.0975 \n", + "14 0.6524 0.3240 0.4172 0.6838 0.2587 0.4869 0.4434 0.5976 \n", + "15 0.3373 0.9305 0.7489 0.5153 0.6694 0.3423 0.7626 0.7591 \n", + "16 0.1310 0.9556 0.9218 0.9437 0.9197 0.4408 0.9296 0.0901 \n", + "\n", + " LUNAR Average_Performance \n", + "0 0.8284 0.66415 \n", + "1 0.5704 0.69021 \n", + "2 0.7926 0.54024 \n", + "3 0.9156 0.71080 \n", + "4 0.9057 0.57632 \n", + "5 0.9357 0.72691 \n", + "6 0.7411 0.69430 \n", + "7 0.7666 0.77917 \n", + "8 0.4836 0.56013 \n", + "9 0.6973 0.67171 \n", + "10 0.7177 0.54117 \n", + "11 0.6179 0.63490 \n", + "12 0.8161 0.88427 \n", + "13 0.6410 0.79559 \n", + "14 0.2552 0.46601 \n", + "15 0.9460 0.61993 \n", + "16 0.9042 0.62985 " + ] + }, + "execution_count": 66, + "metadata": {}, + "output_type": "execute_result" + } + ], + "source": [ + "# 1. Avg performamce of all models on each datset\n", + "model_columns = [\n", + " 'MO-GAAL', 'SO-GAAL', 'AutoEncoder', 'VAE', 'AnoGAN',\n", + " 'DeepSVDD', 'ALAD', 'AE1SVM', 'DevNet', 'LUNAR'\n", + "]\n", + "roc_df = pd.read_csv('roc_df.csv')\n", + "roc_df['Average_Performance'] = roc_df[model_columns].mean(axis=1)\n", + "roc_df" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 67, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "name": "stdout", + "output_type": "stream", + "text": [ + "Dataset: 'pima'; Mode: AE1SVM\n", + "Dataset: 'cardio'; Mode: AutoEncoder\n", + "Dataset: 'mnist'; Mode: VAE\n", + "Dataset: 'arrhythmia'; Mode: AE1SVM\n", + "Dataset: 'pendigits'; Mode: Deep SVDD\n", + "Dataset: 'shuttle'; Mode: AutoEncoder\n", + "Dataset: 'letter'; Mode: VAE\n", + "Dataset: 'musk'; Mode: AutoEncoder\n", + "Dataset: 'vowels'; Mode: AutoEncoder\n", + "Dataset: 'optdigits'; Mode: VAE\n", + "Dataset: 'satellite'; Mode: AutoEncoder\n", + "Dataset: 'lympho'; Mode: AE1SVM\n", + "Dataset: 'ionosphere'; Mode: LUNAR\n", + "Dataset: 'wbc'; Mode: VAE\n", + "Dataset: 'glass'; Mode: LUNAR\n", + "Dataset: 'satimage-2'; Mode: AutoEncoder\n", + "Dataset: 'vertebral'; Mode: VAE\n" + ] + } + ], + "source": [ + "# mode model's performance (with note)\n", + "\n", + "with open('with_note_selection_results/output.json', 'r', encoding='utf-8') as file:\n", + " result_with_note = json.load(file)\n", + "\n", + "with_note_modes = {}\n", + "\n", + "for dataset_name, models in result_with_note.items():\n", + " selected_models = [item['selected_model'] for item in models]\n", + " \n", + " if selected_models:\n", + " model_counts = Counter(selected_models)\n", + " most_common = model_counts.most_common(1)\n", + " if most_common:\n", + " mode_model, count = most_common[0]\n", + " with_note_modes[dataset_name] = mode_model\n", + " else:\n", + " with_note_modes[dataset_name] = None\n", + " else:\n", + " with_note_modes[dataset_name] = None\n", + "for dataset, mode_model in with_note_modes.items():\n", + " print(f\"Dataset: '{dataset}'; Mode: {mode_model}\")" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 68, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "name": "stdout", + "output_type": "stream", + "text": [ + "Dataset: 'pima'; Mode: LUNAR\n", + "Dataset: 'cardio'; Mode: SO-GAAL\n", + "Dataset: 'mnist'; Mode: AutoEncoder\n", + "Dataset: 'arrhythmia'; Mode: VAE\n", + "Dataset: 'pendigits'; Mode: VAE\n", + "Dataset: 'shuttle'; Mode: VAE\n", + "Dataset: 'letter'; Mode: VAE\n", + "Dataset: 'musk'; Mode: AE1SVM\n", + "Dataset: 'vowels'; Mode: VAE\n", + "Dataset: 'optdigits'; Mode: AutoEncoder\n", + "Dataset: 'satellite'; Mode: VAE\n", + "Dataset: 'lympho'; Mode: LUNAR\n", + "Dataset: 'ionosphere'; Mode: VAE\n", + "Dataset: 'wbc'; Mode: LUNAR\n", + "Dataset: 'glass'; Mode: LUNAR\n", + "Dataset: 'satimage-2'; Mode: VAE\n", + "Dataset: 'vertebral'; Mode: VAE\n" + ] + } + ], + "source": [ + "# mode model's performance (without note)\n", + "\n", + "with open('without_note_selection_results/output.json', 'r', encoding='utf-8') as file:\n", + " result_without_note = json.load(file)\n", + "\n", + "without_note_modes = {}\n", + "\n", + "for dataset_name, models in result_without_note.items():\n", + " selected_models = [item['selected_model'] for item in models]\n", + " \n", + " if selected_models:\n", + " model_counts = Counter(selected_models)\n", + " most_common = model_counts.most_common(1)\n", + " if most_common:\n", + " mode_model, count = most_common[0]\n", + " without_note_modes[dataset_name] = mode_model\n", + " else:\n", + " without_note_modes[dataset_name] = None\n", + " else:\n", + " without_note_modes[dataset_name] = None\n", + "for dataset, mode_model in without_note_modes.items():\n", + " print(f\"Dataset: '{dataset}'; Mode: {mode_model}\")" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 69, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "roc_df['without_note_modes'] = roc_df['Data'].map(without_note_modes)\n", + "roc_df['with_note_modes'] = roc_df['Data'].map(with_note_modes)\n", + "\n", + "roc_df['without note'] = roc_df.apply(\n", + " lambda row: row[row['without_note_modes']] if row['without_note_modes'] in roc_df.columns else None, axis=1\n", + ")\n", + "\n", + "roc_df['with note'] = roc_df.apply(\n", + " lambda row: row[row['with_note_modes']] if row['with_note_modes'] in roc_df.columns else None, axis=1\n", + ")\n" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 86, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "# Combine all into one\n", + "\n", + "result_with_baseline = roc_df[[\"Data\",\"AutoEncoder\", 'LUNAR', 'without note', 'with note', 'Average_Performance']]\n", + "result_with_baseline.to_csv('result_with_baseline.csv')" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 87, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "data": { + "text/html": [ + "
\n", + "\n", + "\n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + "
DataAutoEncoderLUNARwithout notewith noteAverage_Performance
0arrhythmia0.81160.82840.81760.81760.66415
1cardio0.78470.57040.72550.78470.69021
2glass0.59010.79260.79260.79260.54024
3ionosphere0.78510.91560.76750.91560.71080
4letter0.80870.90570.58840.58840.57632
5lympho0.98250.93570.93570.96490.72691
6mnist0.85670.74110.85670.90020.69430
7musk0.88530.76661.00000.88530.77917
8optdigits0.51240.48360.51240.50740.56013
9pendigits0.66870.69730.92730.78240.67171
10pima0.71890.71770.71770.60130.54117
11satellite0.64310.61790.74190.64310.63490
12satimage-20.86840.81610.99480.86840.88427
13shuttle0.99390.64100.99470.99390.79559
14vertebral0.32400.25520.41720.41720.46601
15vowels0.93050.94600.74890.93050.61993
16wbc0.95560.90420.90420.92180.62985
\n", + "
" + ], + "text/plain": [ + " Data AutoEncoder LUNAR without note with note \\\n", + "0 arrhythmia 0.8116 0.8284 0.8176 0.8176 \n", + "1 cardio 0.7847 0.5704 0.7255 0.7847 \n", + "2 glass 0.5901 0.7926 0.7926 0.7926 \n", + "3 ionosphere 0.7851 0.9156 0.7675 0.9156 \n", + "4 letter 0.8087 0.9057 0.5884 0.5884 \n", + "5 lympho 0.9825 0.9357 0.9357 0.9649 \n", + "6 mnist 0.8567 0.7411 0.8567 0.9002 \n", + "7 musk 0.8853 0.7666 1.0000 0.8853 \n", + "8 optdigits 0.5124 0.4836 0.5124 0.5074 \n", + "9 pendigits 0.6687 0.6973 0.9273 0.7824 \n", + "10 pima 0.7189 0.7177 0.7177 0.6013 \n", + "11 satellite 0.6431 0.6179 0.7419 0.6431 \n", + "12 satimage-2 0.8684 0.8161 0.9948 0.8684 \n", + "13 shuttle 0.9939 0.6410 0.9947 0.9939 \n", + "14 vertebral 0.3240 0.2552 0.4172 0.4172 \n", + "15 vowels 0.9305 0.9460 0.7489 0.9305 \n", + "16 wbc 0.9556 0.9042 0.9042 0.9218 \n", + "\n", + " Average_Performance \n", + "0 0.66415 \n", + "1 0.69021 \n", + "2 0.54024 \n", + "3 0.71080 \n", + "4 0.57632 \n", + "5 0.72691 \n", + "6 0.69430 \n", + "7 0.77917 \n", + "8 0.56013 \n", + "9 0.67171 \n", + "10 0.54117 \n", + "11 0.63490 \n", + "12 0.88427 \n", + "13 0.79559 \n", + "14 0.46601 \n", + "15 0.61993 \n", + "16 0.62985 " + ] + }, + "execution_count": 87, + "metadata": {}, + "output_type": "execute_result" + } + ], + "source": [ + "result_with_baseline" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 88, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "data": { + "text/html": [ + "
\n", + "\n", + "\n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + " \n", + "
AutoEncoderLUNARwithout notewith noteAverage_Performance
count17.00000017.00000017.00000017.00000017.000000
mean0.7717760.7373590.7907710.7832530.657980
std0.1796210.1836300.1689780.1712410.105573
min0.3240000.2552000.4172000.4172000.466010
25%0.6687000.6410000.7255000.6431000.576320
50%0.8087000.7666000.7926000.8176000.664150
75%0.8853000.9042000.9273000.9156000.710800
max0.9939000.9460001.0000000.9939000.884270
\n", + "
" + ], + "text/plain": [ + " AutoEncoder LUNAR without note with note Average_Performance\n", + "count 17.000000 17.000000 17.000000 17.000000 17.000000\n", + "mean 0.771776 0.737359 0.790771 0.783253 0.657980\n", + "std 0.179621 0.183630 0.168978 0.171241 0.105573\n", + "min 0.324000 0.255200 0.417200 0.417200 0.466010\n", + "25% 0.668700 0.641000 0.725500 0.643100 0.576320\n", + "50% 0.808700 0.766600 0.792600 0.817600 0.664150\n", + "75% 0.885300 0.904200 0.927300 0.915600 0.710800\n", + "max 0.993900 0.946000 1.000000 0.993900 0.884270" + ] + }, + "execution_count": 88, + "metadata": {}, + "output_type": "execute_result" + } + ], + "source": [ + "result_with_baseline.describe()" + ] + } + ], + "metadata": { + "kernelspec": { + "display_name": "gpt", + "language": "python", + "name": "python3" + }, + "language_info": { + "codemirror_mode": { + "name": "ipython", + "version": 3 + }, + "file_extension": ".py", + "mimetype": "text/x-python", + "name": "python", + "nbconvert_exporter": "python", + "pygments_lexer": "ipython3", + "version": "3.9.19" + } + }, + "nbformat": 4, + "nbformat_minor": 4 +} diff --git a/examples/auto_model_selection_example/model_info_summarizer.ipynb b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/model_info_summarizer.ipynb new file mode 100644 index 00000000..82791622 --- /dev/null +++ b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/model_info_summarizer.ipynb @@ -0,0 +1,260 @@ +{ + "cells": [ + { + "cell_type": "markdown", + "metadata": {}, + "source": [ + "### Function to call LLM" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 1, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "from openai import OpenAI\n", + "from dotenv import load_dotenv\n", + "import os\n", + "\n", + "load_dotenv()\n", + "api_key = os.getenv(\"API_KEY\")\n", + "\n", + "client = OpenAI(api_key=api_key)\n", + "\n", + "def call_gpt(prompt):\n", + " messages = [\n", + " {\"role\": \"system\", \"content\": 'You are a well-trained data scientist specifically good at machine learning.'},\n", + " {\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": prompt}\n", + " ]\n", + " response = client.chat.completions.create(\n", + " model=\"gpt-4\",\n", + " messages=messages,\n", + " max_tokens=1000\n", + " ).choices[0].message.content\n", + " return response" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "markdown", + "metadata": {}, + "source": [ + "### Code/ paper summaries" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 2, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "code_summaries = {\n", + " 'MO-GAAL': \"\"\"\n", + "1. MO-GAAL (Multiple Objective Generative Adversarial Active Learning) is an outlier detection algorithm based on Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). It uses multiple sub-generators, each with different objectives, to generate outliers, aiding in separating outliers from normal data. This also helps avoid mode collapse, where the generator produces limited sample variety. The model uses a discriminator to distinguish between real and generated outliers and a generator to produce potential outliers.\n", + "\n", + "2. Advantages include its ability to discover complex outlier structures and improve detection performance, overcoming mode collapse. Disadvantages include the computational expense of training multiple GANs and the need for careful hyperparameter tuning. It may lack interpretability, as deep learning models often act as black boxes.\n", + "\n", + "3. MO-GAAL performs well on high-dimensional data with complex patterns. However, it may be excessive for simpler datasets where more efficient methods could suffice, and it may not be suitable when interpretability is critical.\n", + "\"\"\",\n", + " \n", + " 'SO-GAAL': \"\"\"\n", + "1. SO-GAAL (Single-Objective Generative Adversarial Active Learning) is an outlier detection model using a GAN setup with one generator and one discriminator. The generator produces synthetic data, while the discriminator distinguishes between real and generated data. The model uses generated examples as potential outliers to learn boundaries between normal data and outliers.\n", + "\n", + "2. Its advantages include dynamic learning and adaptability, especially when outliers are rare. However, the model may suffer from mode collapse, generating overly similar or 'good' examples, which could limit its effectiveness.\n", + "\n", + "3. SO-GAAL works well on datasets with rare outliers or complex feature structures but may struggle when outliers cannot be well approximated by the generator or when there are only minor distinctions between normal and outlier data.\n", + "\"\"\",\n", + " \n", + " 'AutoEncoder': \"\"\"\n", + "1. This model is based on an AutoEncoder, a neural network used for unsupervised data representation learning. It compresses input data into a low-dimensional code via an encoder and reconstructs it through a decoder. Outliers are detected based on their reconstruction errors, as they typically deviate from normal instances. The model uses ReLU activation, dropout, and batch normalization to prevent overfitting.\n", + "\n", + "2. AutoEncoders are unsupervised and adaptable, making them versatile across various datasets. However, they are sensitive to hyperparameter selection and may struggle to preserve global data structures.\n", + "\n", + "3. AutoEncoders perform well on structured data like images or sequences but may struggle on noisy or scalar data with no inherent structure, where simpler methods could be more efficient.\n", + "\"\"\",\n", + " \n", + " 'AnoGAN': \"\"\"\n", + "1. AnoGAN uses GANs for outlier detection, with a generator and discriminator. It uses standard GAN training followed by training a separate query model to find the closest latent space point for each data instance. Outliers are detected based on their reconstruction error in the latent space.\n", + "\n", + "2. AnoGAN is effective for modeling complex, high-dimensional data and handles both numerical and categorical data. However, it is computationally expensive, and GAN training is known to be unstable.\n", + "\n", + "3. AnoGAN excels on complex datasets like images or medical scans but may struggle with simpler or imbalanced datasets, where traditional outlier detection methods might be more appropriate.\n", + "\"\"\",\n", + " \n", + " 'Deep SVDD': \"\"\"\n", + "1. Deep SVDD aims to minimize the volume of a hypersphere enclosing the network representations of data during training. It detects outliers by measuring the distance from the center. The architecture is customizable, allowing users to define the network layers and activation functions. It can also operate in autoencoder mode, where the encoder-decoder structure mirrors itself.\n", + "\n", + "2. Advantages include unsupervised learning, flexibility in network architecture, and regularization options like dropout and L2. Disadvantages involve the need for trial-and-error hyperparameter tuning and the requirement of large datasets for effective training.\n", + "\n", + "3. Deep SVDD performs well on datasets with identifiable patterns but struggles with noisy, imbalanced, or complex datasets where outliers are not easily separable from normal data.\n", + "\"\"\",\n", + " \n", + " 'ALAD': \"\"\"\n", + "1. ALAD uses a GAN architecture with an encoder, a generator, and three discriminators to distinguish real from generated data. The model can also incorporate reconstruction loss for improved performance.\n", + "\n", + "2. ALAD excels at detecting complex patterns and works well on high-dimensional data. However, it requires substantial computational resources and may perform poorly when the data distribution is difficult to learn or when the dataset is small.\n", + "\n", + "3. ALAD is effective for complex, high-dimensional datasets but may struggle with small or simple datasets, where traditional methods might be more efficient.\n", + "\"\"\",\n", + "\n", + " 'AE1SVM' : \"\"\"\n", + "\n", + "1. This model combines an Autoencoder (AE) with a One-Class Support Vector Machine (SVM) to detect outliers. The Autoencoder learns a compressed representation of the data through encoding and decoding layers, while the One-Class SVM works on the encoded data's random Fourier features to separate normal data from outliers. The architecture uses hidden layers with customizable neurons, ReLU activations, batch normalization, and dropout for regularization. By utilizing random Fourier features in the SVM, it approximates a kernel function, allowing for non-linear decision boundaries to better distinguish outliers.\n", + "\n", + "2. Advantages: The model can capture complex data patterns through the Autoencoder's deep structure and the SVM’s non-linear decision boundaries, providing enhanced outlier detection in non-linearly separable data. Batch normalization and dropout improve training stability and prevent overfitting. Disadvantages: It is computationally expensive, especially with a large number of random Fourier features. Training this model may be time-consuming due to the Autoencoder and SVM combination, which could also make it less effective on small datasets or real-time applications.\n", + "\n", + "3. Good performance: This model is ideal for large datasets with high dimensionality and complex, non-linear patterns, where normal and anomalous data have distinguishable structures. Poor performance: It may perform poorly on small datasets, highly noisy datasets, or data with simple, linear separations between normal and anomalous points, as the model's complexity could lead to overfitting or unnecessary computation.\n", + "\"\"\",\n", + "\n", + " 'DevNet' : \"\"\"\n", + "\n", + "1. DevNet's architecture varies in depth with options for shallow or deep networks, which include three specific models: DevNetD (3 hidden layers), DevNetS (1 hidden layer), and DevNetLinear (no hidden layer). These configurations allow flexible model complexity based on data needs. Each hidden layer uses ReLU activations, which helps capture non-linear patterns in the data. The model uses a specialized deviation loss, which applies Z-score deviation based on the assumption that inliers and outliers deviate from a reference distribution differently, optimizing the model to distinguish between them effectively.\n", + "\n", + "2. Advantages: The flexibility of choosing the network depth makes it adaptable to various data complexities. The deviation loss function is tailored for outlier detection, providing direct optimization for distinguishing anomalies from normal instances. Disadvantages: Deep models, such as DevNetD, could overfit on small datasets with limited diversity, potentially reducing generalizability. The model may struggle with datasets containing subtle or high-dimensional anomalies that are hard to capture with simple linear layers. Training a deep network can be computationally expensive and requires considerable tuning, especially on larger datasets.\n", + "\n", + "3. Good Performance: DevNet will likely perform well on datasets where the outliers exhibit distinct characteristics from the inliers, particularly if the data is moderately complex with features that can be captured by shallow or deep neural networks (e.g., low-dimensional structured data or data with clear, distinguishable outlier patterns). Poor Performance: The model might struggle on high-dimensional datasets where anomalies are subtle and require more sophisticated feature extraction than linear layers can provide. Additionally, if the outliers do not significantly deviate from the inliers, the deviation-based loss function may not effectively identify them.\n", + "\"\"\",\n", + "\n", + " 'RGraph' : \"\"\"\n", + "\n", + "1. The RGraph model uses an elastic net subspace clustering technique with a graph-based transition matrix to represent data self-representation and outlier scoring. It combines elements of sparse representation (via the Lasso and linear regression) and an active support strategy to optimize computations, especially for large datasets. It detects outliers by constructing a transition matrix normalized by L1, followed by transition steps that propagate a probability vector through this matrix. Lower scores from this transition process signify outliers.\n", + "\n", + "2. Advantages: It handles high-dimensional data well due to its reliance on sparse representations. The active support algorithm can optimize the process, making it scalable for large datasets. Disadvantages: The model may be computationally intensive, especially if the active support is not correctly tuned, as it iteratively solves optimization problems. Sensitivity to hyperparameters (like tau, gamma) can make the model difficult to tune, potentially impacting performance on noisy data.\n", + "\n", + "3. Good performance: This model should perform well on high-dimensional, sparse datasets where data points reside in low-dimensional subspaces (e.g., image or signal data with natural clusters). Poor performance: It may struggle on dense, low-dimensional datasets with strong non-linear relationships, as its linear clustering technique might not capture complex patterns, potentially leading to poor outlier identification.\n", + "\"\"\",\n", + "\n", + " 'LUNAR' : \"\"\"\n", + "\n", + "1. The LUNAR model uses graph neural networks to unify local outlier detection methods by leveraging nearest neighbors. Its architecture consists of two neural networks, SCORE_MODEL and WEIGHT_MODEL, each with three hidden layers of 256 units. The activation functions differ: SCORE_MODEL uses Tanh activations and a Sigmoid output, while WEIGHT_MODEL uses ReLU activations with a final layer normalizing weights via LayerNorm and BatchNorm. LUNAR generates anomaly scores by evaluating the distance between data points and their nearest neighbors and employs a unique negative sampling approach, using random uniform and subspace perturbations to simulate outliers.\n", + "\n", + "2. Advantages: Flexibility: LUNAR's dual model approach allows for adaptability in scoring based on different types of outliers. Local Context Awareness: By focusing on k-nearest neighbors, it effectively captures local data structures, which can improve the detection of local outliers. Robust Sampling: The negative sampling technique enhances training by simulating diverse outlier types, potentially improving detection accuracy. Disadvantages: Computationally Intensive: The model’s reliance on neural networks and nearest neighbor searches could lead to high computational costs, particularly on large datasets. Hyperparameter Sensitivity: Its performance is likely sensitive to parameters like n_neighbors, sampling proportion, and model type, which may require fine-tuning for optimal results.\n", + "\n", + "3. Good Performance: The model will likely excel on datasets with well-defined clusters or local structures where outliers are distinct from the majority class. Examples include structured datasets like social network data, sensor data, and geospatial data. Poor Performance: LUNAR may struggle on high-dimensional or noisy datasets where local neighborhood relationships are less meaningful or when the data is too sparse, making it difficult to discern local outliers effectively.\n", + "\"\"\",\n", + " 'VAE' : \"\"\"\n", + "\n", + "1. The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) has separate encoder and decoder architectures. The encoder reduces input features to a latent representation defined by mean (z_mu) and log variance (z_logvar). The decoder reconstructs the input from this latent representation. The loss is a combination of reconstruction loss (mean squared error) and KL divergence, weighted by a beta coefficient. This controls the tradeoff between reconstruction accuracy and latent space regularization.\n", + "\n", + "2. Advantages: Captures complex patterns in the data due to its non-linear latent space. The KL divergence term ensures a structured latent space, potentially improving generalization. Flexible hyperparameters like beta and capacity allow tailored regularization. Disadvantages: Performance can degrade with poorly tuned hyperparameters, such as the beta coefficient. Requires sufficient data for training, making it computationally expensive. Sensitive to feature scaling and preprocessing\n", + "\n", + "3. Good Performance: Datasets with continuous, high-dimensional data where outliers deviate significantly in structure or distribution, e.g., image or audio datasets. Data with moderate noise but strong underlying patterns that the VAE can learn. Bad Performance: Datasets with discrete or categorical data without preprocessing. Small datasets with insufficient examples to learn an effective latent representation. Datasets where outliers are very similar to inliers in terms of reconstruction, reducing the efficacy of the reconstruction error metric.\n", + "\"\"\"\n", + "}\n", + "\n", + "\n", + "#model信息2：paper summarize\n", + "\n", + "paper_summaries = {\n", + " \"MO-GAAL\": \"MO-GAAL is an anomaly detection model designed to address the challenges in high-dimensional data by using multiple generators to create potential outliers that inform a discriminator about normal data boundaries. This approach mitigates the mode collapse issue found in single-generator models (like SO-GAAL) by using diverse objectives for each generator, enhancing robustness across different data types and structures. The model performs particularly well in detecting anomalies in datasets with complex cluster formations, high irrelevant variable ratios, and high-dimensionality scenarios. Suitable data sizes: medium, large. Data types: tabular data, images. Domains or fields: medical, technology, finance, manufacturing. Specific characteristics: high dimensionality, sparse data, imbalanced data, real-time data. Computational resources required: GPU, high memory. Training time and scalability: long training time, scalable to large datasets.\",\n", + " \n", + " \"AE1SVM\": \"AE-1SVM integrates autoencoders for dimensionality reduction with one-class SVM (OC-SVM) for anomaly detection. Using random Fourier features to approximate the RBF kernel, it enables the model to handle high-dimensional data efficiently. By combining these components into a unified, end-to-end architecture optimized with stochastic gradient descent, AE-1SVM addresses the computational limitations of traditional OC-SVM, providing scalability for large datasets. The model also supports interpretability through gradient-based attribution methods, allowing users to understand feature contributions to the anomaly detection decision. Suitable data sizes: large. Data types: tabular data, images. Domains or fields: medical, finance, technology, manufacturing. Specific characteristics: high dimensionality, sparse data, imbalanced data. Computational resources required: GPU, high memory. Training time and scalability: short training time, scalable to large datasets.\",\n", + "\n", + " \"DevNet\": \"DevNet is an anomaly detection model that directly optimizes anomaly scores by leveraging a small number of labeled anomalies alongside unlabeled data. Instead of indirect representation learning, DevNet uses a deviation loss function based on Z-scores, enforcing that anomalies receive significantly higher scores than normal data. This end-to-end approach results in interpretable anomaly scores and allows the model to handle diverse anomaly behaviors effectively. Experimental results show that DevNet significantly improves performance on both the AUC-ROC and AUC-PR metrics compared to other models. Suitable data sizes: medium, large. Data types: tabular data, text, images. Domains or fields: finance, cybersecurity, healthcare, technology. Specific characteristics: high dimensionality, sparse data, imbalanced data, noisy data. Computational resources required: GPU, high memory. Training time and scalability: short training time, scalable to large datasets.\",\n", + "\n", + " \"AnoGAN\": \"AnoGAN is a GAN-based model for unsupervised anomaly detection, specifically designed for medical imaging, such as retinal scans. By learning the manifold of normal anatomical variability, AnoGAN can identify anomalies that deviate from this learned distribution. Using a residual and discrimination loss, the model maps new images to the latent space, comparing them against normal anatomical patterns. This process enables pixel-level anomaly detection, allowing for both anomaly scoring and the identification of specific anomalous regions, such as retinal fluid or hyperreflective foci. The model has shown effectiveness in detecting known anomalies while also identifying potential unknown markers. Suitable data sizes: large. Data types: images. Domains or fields: medical (particularly ophthalmology). Specific characteristics: high dimensionality, noisy data. Computational resources required: GPU, high memory. Training time and scalability: long training time, scalable to large datasets.\",\n", + "\n", + " \"ALAD\": \"ALAD is a GAN-based anomaly detection model that leverages a bi-directional GAN, incorporating both a generator and an encoder, to improve efficiency in detecting anomalies. Unlike traditional GAN-based methods, ALAD includes a latent space encoder, allowing it to perform faster and more reliable anomaly scoring without extensive inference time. By adding cycle-consistency and spectral normalization, ALAD stabilizes GAN training and enhances anomaly detection, particularly in high-dimensional and complex datasets. The model uses a reconstruction-based anomaly score computed in feature space, enabling robust anomaly detection. Suitable data sizes: medium, large. Data types: tabular data, images. Domains or fields: cybersecurity, healthcare, finance, technology. Specific characteristics: high dimensionality, noisy data, sparse data, imbalanced data. Computational resources required: GPU, high memory. Training time and scalability: long training time, scalable to large datasets.\",\n", + "\n", + " \"Deep SVDD\": \"DeepSVDD is a deep learning model for unsupervised anomaly detection, designed to map data points into a hypersphere in a lower-dimensional space, minimizing the sphere’s volume around the normal data. By leveraging a neural network trained with a one-class objective, the model reduces the need for feature engineering common in traditional methods like OC-SVM. DeepSVDD optimizes the network to identify common factors in normal data while mapping anomalies outside the hypersphere, making it particularly effective for high-dimensional, structured datasets. It has been evaluated on image data, including MNIST and CIFAR-10, where it demonstrated competitive performance in one-class classification tasks. Suitable data sizes: medium, large. Data types: images. Domains or fields: cybersecurity, healthcare, technology, automotive. Specific characteristics: high dimensionality, noisy data. Computational resources required: GPU, high memory. Training time and scalability: long training time, scalable to large datasets.\",\n", + "\n", + " \"LUNAR\": \"LUNAR is a graph neural network (GNN)-based anomaly detection model that unifies and enhances local outlier detection methods like LOF, DBSCAN, and KNN by incorporating learnability into the detection process. By using a GNN architecture, LUNAR leverages a message-passing framework to dynamically aggregate information from the nearest neighbors of each node in a learnable way, improving anomaly detection flexibility and accuracy across different datasets. It particularly outperforms traditional local outlier methods and deep learning baselines in handling unstructured, feature-based data. LUNAR’s robustness to different neighborhood sizes allows it to adapt effectively across diverse datasets with limited tuning. Suitable data sizes: medium, large. Data types: tabular data, unstructured data. Domains or fields: finance, healthcare, technology, cybersecurity. Specific characteristics: sparse data, imbalanced data, high dimensionality. Computational resources required: GPU, high memory. Training time and scalability: short training time, scalable to large datasets.\",\n", + "\n", + " \"RGraph\": \"The R-Graph model uses a self-representation framework to detect outliers in data by constructing a representation graph. This graph leverages sparse and low-rank structures, where inliers form well-connected clusters within subspaces, and outliers fail to integrate into these clusters. By performing a random walk on this graph, the model distinguishes inliers as 'essential states' and outliers as 'inessential states,' allowing for robust detection, even in multi-subspace settings. The R-Graph approach performs effectively on image datasets, including face recognition and object images, especially where data is structured into clusters or subspaces. Suitable data sizes: medium, large. Data types: images. Domains or fields: computer vision, security, technology. Specific characteristics: high dimensionality, sparse data. Computational resources required: GPU, high memory. Training time and scalability: long training time, scalable to large datasets.\",\n", + " \n", + " \"VAE\": \"The VAE model uses a probabilistic approach for learning efficient representations through a variational autoencoding process. It introduces a reparameterization trick to optimize the variational lower bound via gradient descent, effectively approximating complex distributions using a generative model. VAEs are especially useful for data generation and dimensionality reduction tasks, handling intractable posterior distributions efficiently. The model demonstrates versatility in unsupervised learning tasks such as image denoising, inpainting, and data compression. Suitable data sizes: medium, large. Data types: images, tabular data. Domains or fields: healthcare, technology, education. Specific characteristics: high dimensionality, noisy data. Computational resources required: GPU, high memory. Training time and scalability: short training time, scalable to large datasets.\",\n", + "\n", + " \"SO-GAAL\": \"SO-GAAL is a GAN-based model designed for unsupervised outlier detection by treating outlier generation as a binary classification problem. It uses a single generator-discriminator pair, where the generator creates synthetic outliers to challenge the discriminator, which in turn learns to distinguish real data from these generated outliers. This approach helps in establishing a decision boundary around normal data by iteratively learning from the most informative potential outliers. SO-GAAL addresses the 'curse of dimensionality' and reduces reliance on predefined data assumptions, though it is susceptible to mode collapse, leading to limited performance in complex, clustered datasets. Suitable data sizes: small, medium. Data types: tabular data, images. Domains or fields: finance, manufacturing, healthcare, technology. Specific characteristics: sparse data, imbalanced data. Computational resources required: GPU, low memory. Training time and scalability: short training time, limited scalability to larger datasets.\",\n", + "\n", + " \"AutoEncoder\": \"Autoencoders are neural network models used for dimensionality reduction and anomaly detection by learning a compressed representation of the data. Typically structured as replicator neural networks, AEs have a symmetrical encoder-decoder architecture, where the input is compressed into a latent space by the encoder and then reconstructed by the decoder. The reconstruction error (difference between input and output) serves as an indicator of anomalies, as outliers tend to have higher reconstruction errors. AEs are particularly effective for reducing high-dimensional data, making them suitable alternatives to PCA and matrix factorization. Advanced variations like deep autoencoders can handle more complex, nonlinear distributions, often using pretraining to improve model stability and avoid overfitting. This model has applications in domains where high-dimensional data compression or outlier detection is crucial. Suitable data sizes: medium, large. Data types: images, tabular data. Domains or fields: healthcare, technology, finance, security. Specific characteristics: high dimensionality, noisy data, sparse data. Computational resources required: GPU, high memory. Training time and scalability: short to medium training time, scalable to large datasets.\"\n", + "}" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 3, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "def create_prompt(single_model_paper_summary, single_model_code_summary):\n", + " prompt = f\"\"\"\n", + "You are an expert in machine learning models and datasets.\n", + "\n", + "Given the following model summaries, analyze the model's strengths and weaknesses in terms of its suitability for different types of datasets. \n", + "\n", + "Your analysis should include these factors:\n", + "- Suitable data sizes: Choose from [\"small\", \"medium\", \"large\"].\n", + "- Data types: Choose from [\"images\", \"text\", \"tabular data\", \"time series\", \"audio\", \"video\"].\n", + "- Domains or fields: Choose from [\"medical\", \"finance\", \"education\", \"social media\", \"retail\", \"manufacturing\", \"agriculture\", \"technology\", \"automotive\", \"others\"].\n", + "- Suitable data type: Choose from [\"noisy data\", \"high dimensionality\", \"sparse data\", \"imbalanced data\", \"real-time data\", \"low-signal data\"].\n", + "- Computational resources required: Choose from [\"CPU\", \"GPU\", \"high memory\", \"low memory\"].\n", + "- Training time and scalability: Choose from [\"short training time\", \"long training time\", \"scalable to large datasets\", \"not scalable\"].\n", + "\n", + "Please provide your analysis in JSON format with two keys: \"strengths\" and \"weaknesses\", each should contain a list of the keywords you chose (\"label\" field) + their corresponding \"explanation\".\n", + "\n", + "Here is the model's paper summary:\n", + "{single_model_paper_summary}\n", + "\n", + "Here is the model's code summary:\n", + "{single_model_code_summary}\n", + "\"\"\"\n", + "\n", + " return prompt\n" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": null, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "import json\n", + "\n", + "output_folder = 'model_analysis_jsons'\n", + "os.makedirs(output_folder, exist_ok=True)\n", + "\n", + "for model_name in code_summaries.keys():\n", + " paper_summary = paper_summaries[model_name]\n", + " code_summary = code_summaries[model_name]\n", + " prompt = create_prompt(paper_summary, code_summary)\n", + " \n", + " assistant_reply = call_gpt(prompt)\n", + " \n", + " # Parse the reply as JSON\n", + " try:\n", + " analysis = json.loads(assistant_reply)\n", + " except json.JSONDecodeError:\n", + " print(f'JSON parsing failed for model {model_name}')\n", + " continue\n", + " \n", + " # Save the JSON to a file\n", + " output_file = os.path.join(output_folder, f'{model_name}.json')\n", + " with open(output_file, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:\n", + " json.dump(analysis, f, ensure_ascii=False, indent=4)\n", + " \n", + " print(f'Analysis for model {model_name} has been saved to {output_file}')" + ] + } + ], + "metadata": { + "kernelspec": { + "display_name": "chatgpt", + "language": "python", + "name": "python3" + }, + "language_info": { + "codemirror_mode": { + "name": "ipython", + "version": 3 + }, + "file_extension": ".py", + "mimetype": "text/x-python", + "name": "python", + "nbconvert_exporter": "python", + "pygments_lexer": "ipython3", + "version": "3.9.19" + } + }, + "nbformat": 4, + "nbformat_minor": 2 +} diff --git a/examples/auto_model_selection_example/prn_df.csv b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/prn_df.csv new file mode 100644 index 00000000..22b88436 --- /dev/null +++ b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/prn_df.csv @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +,Data,#Samples,# Dimensions,Outlier Perc,MO-GAAL,SO-GAAL,AutoEncoder,VAE,AnoGAN,DeepSVDD,ALAD,AE1SVM,DevNet,LUNAR +0,arrhythmia,452,274,14.6018,0.3214,0.2857,0.3929,0.4286,0.4643,0.3929,0.0357,0.3929,0.0714,0.4643 +0,cardio,1831,21,9.6122,0.2,0.4143,0.3,0.6571,0.3429,0.5,0.2429,0.5571,0.0,0.2143 +0,glass,214,9,4.2056,0.0,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.0,0.2,0.0,0.2 +0,ionosphere,351,33,35.8974,0.5217,0.413,0.587,0.4783,0.4348,0.4783,0.3261,0.4565,0.5,0.8043 +0,letter,1600,32,6.25,0.0488,0.05,0.2439,0.0732,0.0488,0.0488,0.0732,0.122,0.1951,0.4146 +0,lympho,148,18,4.0541,0.3333,0.3333,0.6667,0.6667,0.6667,0.3333,0.3333,0.3333,0.0,0.6667 +0,mnist,7603,100,9.2069,0.1963,0.2852,0.3741,0.4519,0.2519,0.2704,0.0963,0.3852,0.0704,0.337 +0,musk,3062,166,3.1679,0.0976,0.0,0.3659,1.0,0.0976,0.4146,0.0244,1.0,0.9268,0.1951 +0,optdigits,5216,64,2.8758,0.1385,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0308,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0462 +0,pendigits,6870,16,2.2707,0.0,0.0455,0.0484,0.3065,0.0161,0.0484,0.0484,0.2419,0.0,0.129 +0,pima,768,8,34.8958,0.2212,0.1681,0.5752,0.4867,0.5487,0.5133,0.3805,0.4779,0.2743,0.5575 +0,satellite,6435,36,31.6395,0.5111,0.4059,0.4951,0.5603,0.5542,0.4163,0.3214,0.5591,0.383,0.431 +0,satimage-2,5803,36,1.2235,0.0,0.0,0.3226,0.7097,0.6129,0.5161,0.0645,0.6129,0.0,0.2903 +0,shuttle,49097,9,7.1511,0.6092,0.0,0.9068,0.957,0.9591,0.9527,0.2399,0.9245,0.0064,0.1934 +0,vertebral,240,6,12.5,0.1429,0.1429,0.0,0.1429,0.2143,0.0,0.2143,0.1429,0.2143,0.0 +0,vowels,1456,12,3.4341,0.0,0.0,0.4545,0.2727,0.0,0.0909,0.0,0.3636,0.0,0.5455 +0,wbc,378,30,5.5556,0.0,0.0,0.5,0.6,0.6,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.0,0.4 diff --git a/examples/auto_model_selection_example/readme.md b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/readme.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..89d9086d --- /dev/null +++ b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/readme.md @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +### Framework Explanation: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Dataset Analysis and Automated Model Selection + +--- + +### **1. Loading Model Analyses: Encoding Knowledge as Symbolic Tags** +The framework begins by processing pre-analyzed model metadata stored in JSON files. These metadata contain explicit, symbolic descriptions of each model’s **strengths** and **weaknesses**, designed to facilitate reasoning about model applicability to specific datasets. + +The core of our framework is the utilization of symbolic representations to characterize each model's strengths and weaknesses. These symbols are derived systematically by analyzing the respective papers and source code of each model. This process ensures that the symbolic descriptions capture both the theoretical foundations and practical implementations of the models. + +Specifically: +- **Paper Analysis**: We review the primary research papers describing each model to identify its targeted application domains, key advantages, and known limitations. For instance, for models like AnoGAN, the focus on high-dimensional medical images is highlighted in its foundational paper. +- **Code Inspection**: By examining the source code, we extract implementation-specific details such as computational requirements (e.g., GPU dependence), scalability considerations, and specific preprocessing requirements. This complements the theoretical understanding provided in the papers. + +These extracted symbols are then structured into: +- **Strengths**: Key attributes where the model excels, represented as labels such as "images", "medical", or "high dimensionality". Each label includes a detailed explanation derived from the literature and implementation insights. +- **Weaknesses**: Known limitations or scenarios where the model is less effective, such as "small data size" or "real-time data". + + +#### **Key Functionality:** +- **Input:** JSON files for each model with tags such as: + - `strengths`: e.g., "images", "medical", "high dimensionality". + - `weaknesses`: e.g., "small data size", "text data". +- **Process:** Extract and store symbolic information in a structured dictionary, where each model is mapped to its strengths and weaknesses. +- **Output:** A structured knowledge base enabling symbolic reasoning in later stages. + +#### **Symbolic Value:** +By explicitly encoding domain-specific properties and limitations, this step transforms the selection process into a logical reasoning task, allowing systematic alignment with dataset characteristics. + +--- + +### **2. Dataset Profiling: Statistical Summarization and Tagging** +The framework analyzes the input dataset to produce a comprehensive statistical profile, summarizing its key characteristics. These include both high-level descriptors (e.g., data types, dimensionality) and deeper statistical properties (e.g., skewness, kurtosis). + +#### **Key Functionality:** +- **Input:** Raw dataset (`pandas.DataFrame`) and optional user notes. +- **Process:** + - Compute dataset-level attributes such as shape, data type distribution, missing value ratio, and numerical feature statistics. + - Quantify statistical metrics for numerical columns, such as skewness and kurtosis, to capture data complexity. + - Generate symbolic tags (e.g., "noisy data", "high dimensionality") based on the profile. +- **Output:** A structured dataset description and standardized symbolic tags. + +#### **Neurosymbolic Integration:** +- **Symbolic:** Converts raw statistical features into tags, enabling alignment with model descriptions. +- **Neural:** Uses GPT to refine and adapt the tags, ensuring compatibility with the downstream symbolic reasoning framework. + +--- + +### **3. GPT-Driven Tagging: Neural Refinement of Dataset Properties** +Using the dataset's statistical summary, the GPT model generates a refined, standardized set of tags that describe the dataset in terms relevant to model selection. These tags represent the dataset's **semantic properties**, such as size, domain, and computational requirements. + +#### **Key Functionality:** +- **Input:** Statistical summary of the dataset, including computed metrics and descriptive notes. +- **Process:** GPT generates tags in JSON format using predefined categories: + - Data size: e.g., "small", "medium", "large". + - Data type: e.g., "images", "tabular data". + - Domain: e.g., "medical", "finance". + - Characteristics: e.g., "noisy data", "imbalanced data". + - Computational constraints: e.g., "GPU", "high memory". +- **Output:** JSON-formatted tags, ready for comparison with model strengths and weaknesses. + +#### **Neural Value:** +GPT’s ability to generalize across diverse datasets ensures the generated tags align semantically with model descriptions, even for datasets with novel or ambiguous characteristics. + +--- + +### **4. Automated Model Selection: Symbolic Reasoning Enhanced by Neural Insight** +This step compares dataset tags with model metadata to determine the most suitable model for the given dataset. The decision-making process combines: +- Symbolic reasoning for structured tag alignment. +- Neural capabilities of GPT for complex, context-aware recommendations. + +#### **Key Functionality:** +- **Input:** Dataset tags, model strengths and weaknesses, and a list of available models. +- **Process:** + - Symbolic matching of dataset tags to model strengths. + - Neural reasoning via GPT to evaluate trade-offs between competing models. + - Generate a JSON output with the recommended model and an explanation of the decision. +- **Output:** Selected model and rationale. + +#### **Example:** +Given a dataset described by: +```json +{ + "tags": ["images", "medical", "high dimensionality", "noisy data", "GPU"] +} +``` +And the model `AnoGAN` with strengths like "medical", "images", and weaknesses like "small data size", GPT selects `AnoGAN` due to its strong alignment with the dataset properties and mitigable weaknesses. + +--- + +### **5. Model Deployment: Dynamically Instantiating the Classifier** +Once a model is selected, the framework dynamically initializes it with appropriate configurations, ready for training or inference. + +#### **Key Functionality:** +- **Input:** Selected model name and its hyperparameter settings. +- **Process:** Import the relevant model class from the library, set its parameters, and return an initialized instance. +- **Output:** A fully instantiated classifier object. + +#### **Example Deployment:** +For `AnoGAN`, the framework initializes the model with GPU acceleration, batch size, and epoch settings tailored to the dataset. Conversely, for text-based datasets, it avoids image-specific models like `AnoGAN`. + +--- + +### **Advantages of the Framework** +#### **1. Symbolic Reasoning for Interpretability** +The explicit use of symbolic tags for models and datasets enhances interpretability, providing clear explanations for why a model was selected. + +#### **2. Neural Flexibility for Complex Reasoning** +GPT’s neural capabilities enable nuanced trade-offs in ambiguous scenarios, such as datasets that partially align with multiple models. + +#### **3. Generality Across Domains** +The modular design accommodates diverse datasets, from images to tabular data, and seamlessly integrates new models and tags. + +#### **4. Automation and Scalability** +By automating both dataset profiling and model selection, the framework reduces the need for manual intervention, making it scalable for real-world applications. + +--- + +### **End-to-End Example: A Neurosymbolic Workflow** +1. **Input:** + - Dataset Tags: `["images", "medical", "high dimensionality", "noisy data", "GPU"]` + - Models: `AnoGAN`, `AutoEncoder`, `DeepSVDD`. +2. **Output:** + - Selected Model: `AnoGAN` + - Rationale: `"AnoGAN's strengths align with the dataset properties, particularly its focus on medical images and handling of high-dimensional, noisy data."` + +This neurosymbolic approach ensures robust, explainable, and efficient model selection tailored to the needs of complex datasets. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/examples/auto_model_selection_example/result_with_baseline.csv b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/result_with_baseline.csv new file mode 100644 index 00000000..aadf7033 --- /dev/null +++ b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/result_with_baseline.csv @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +,Data,AutoEncoder,LUNAR,without note,with note,Average_Performance +0,arrhythmia,0.8116,0.8284,0.8176,0.8176,0.66415 +1,cardio,0.7847,0.5704,0.7255,0.7847,0.69021 +2,glass,0.5901,0.7926,0.7926,0.7926,0.54024 +3,ionosphere,0.7851,0.9156,0.7675,0.9156,0.7108000000000001 +4,letter,0.8087,0.9057,0.5884,0.5884,0.5763199999999999 +5,lympho,0.9825,0.9357,0.9357,0.9649,0.72691 +6,mnist,0.8567,0.7411,0.8567,0.9002,0.6943 +7,musk,0.8853,0.7666,1.0,0.8853,0.77917 +8,optdigits,0.5124,0.4836,0.5124,0.5074,0.5601299999999999 +9,pendigits,0.6687,0.6973,0.9273,0.7824,0.67171 +10,pima,0.7189,0.7177,0.7177,0.6013,0.5411699999999999 +11,satellite,0.6431,0.6179,0.7419,0.6431,0.6348999999999999 +12,satimage-2,0.8684,0.8161,0.9948,0.8684,0.8842700000000002 +13,shuttle,0.9939,0.641,0.9947,0.9939,0.79559 +14,vertebral,0.324,0.2552,0.4172,0.4172,0.4660100000000001 +15,vowels,0.9305,0.946,0.7489,0.9305,0.6199299999999999 +16,wbc,0.9556,0.9042,0.9042,0.9218,0.62985 diff --git a/examples/auto_model_selection_example/roc_df.csv b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/roc_df.csv new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5fd2aeba --- /dev/null +++ b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/roc_df.csv @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +,Unnamed: 0,Data,#Samples,# Dimensions,Outlier Perc,MO-GAAL,SO-GAAL,AutoEncoder,VAE,AnoGAN,DeepSVDD,ALAD,AE1SVM,DevNet,LUNAR,Average_Performance,without_note_modes,with_note_modes,without note,with note +0,0,arrhythmia,452,274,14.6018,0.616,0.5661,0.8116,0.8176,0.7946,0.7554,0.4232,0.8176,0.211,0.8284,0.66415,VAE,AE1SVM,0.8176,0.8176 +1,0,cardio,1831,21,9.6122,0.5603,0.7255,0.7847,0.9615,0.8004,0.934,0.6025,0.9125,0.0503,0.5704,0.69021,SO-GAAL,AutoEncoder,0.7255,0.7847 +2,0,glass,214,9,4.2056,0.4247,0.3975,0.5901,0.6099,0.6765,0.4,0.2667,0.6864,0.558,0.7926,0.54024,LUNAR,LUNAR,0.7926,0.7926 +3,0,ionosphere,351,33,35.8974,0.6751,0.5908,0.7851,0.7675,0.66,0.7535,0.5046,0.773,0.6828,0.9156,0.7108000000000001,VAE,LUNAR,0.7675,0.9156 +4,0,letter,1600,32,6.25,0.3489,0.3074,0.8087,0.5884,0.5223,0.5133,0.4811,0.5883,0.6991,0.9057,0.5763199999999999,VAE,VAE,0.5884,0.5884 +5,0,lympho,148,18,4.0541,0.5263,0.3918,0.9825,0.9825,0.9825,0.8421,0.6374,0.9649,0.0234,0.9357,0.72691,LUNAR,AE1SVM,0.9357,0.9649 +6,0,mnist,7603,100,9.2069,0.6122,0.6926,0.8567,0.9002,0.6688,0.7207,0.4786,0.8721,0.4,0.7411,0.6943,AutoEncoder,VAE,0.8567,0.9002 +7,0,musk,3062,166,3.1679,0.5686,0.4388,0.8853,1.0,0.806,0.9505,0.3772,1.0,0.9987,0.7666,0.77917,AE1SVM,AutoEncoder,1.0,0.8853 +8,0,optdigits,5216,64,2.8758,0.6552,0.4641,0.5124,0.5074,0.8159,0.5199,0.494,0.4455,0.7033,0.4836,0.5601299999999999,AutoEncoder,VAE,0.5124,0.5074 +9,0,pendigits,6870,16,2.2707,0.6974,0.5114,0.6687,0.9273,0.8492,0.7824,0.569,0.9097,0.1047,0.6973,0.67171,VAE,Deep SVDD,0.9273, +10,0,pima,768,8,34.8958,0.2915,0.2593,0.7189,0.6112,0.6403,0.6713,0.5437,0.6013,0.3565,0.7177,0.5411699999999999,LUNAR,AE1SVM,0.7177,0.6013 +11,0,satellite,6435,36,31.6395,0.6742,0.5679,0.6431,0.7419,0.7241,0.5839,0.5014,0.7522,0.5424,0.6179,0.6348999999999999,VAE,AutoEncoder,0.7419,0.6431 +12,0,satimage-2,5803,36,1.2235,0.9693,0.8797,0.8684,0.9948,0.9667,0.9667,0.5848,0.9922,0.804,0.8161,0.8842700000000002,VAE,AutoEncoder,0.9948,0.8684 +13,0,shuttle,49097,9,7.1511,0.9085,0.7012,0.9939,0.9947,0.9866,0.9935,0.649,0.99,0.0975,0.641,0.79559,VAE,AutoEncoder,0.9947,0.9939 +14,0,vertebral,240,6,12.5,0.5409,0.6524,0.324,0.4172,0.6838,0.2587,0.4869,0.4434,0.5976,0.2552,0.4660100000000001,VAE,VAE,0.4172,0.4172 +15,0,vowels,1456,12,3.4341,0.1879,0.3373,0.9305,0.7489,0.5153,0.6694,0.3423,0.7626,0.7591,0.946,0.6199299999999999,VAE,AutoEncoder,0.7489,0.9305 +16,0,wbc,378,30,5.5556,0.062,0.131,0.9556,0.9218,0.9437,0.9197,0.4408,0.9296,0.0901,0.9042,0.62985,LUNAR,VAE,0.9042,0.9218 diff --git a/examples/auto_model_selection_example/time_df.csv b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/time_df.csv new file mode 100644 index 00000000..398bec33 --- /dev/null +++ b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/time_df.csv @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +,Data,#Samples,# Dimensions,Outlier Perc,MO-GAAL,SO-GAAL,AutoEncoder,VAE,AnoGAN,DeepSVDD,ALAD,AE1SVM,DevNet,LUNAR +0,arrhythmia,452,274,14.6018,2.2201,0.4481,2.3577,0.8746,25.0503,0.4209,2.6153,1.4392,0.3011,1.0523 +0,cardio,1831,21,9.6122,1.935,0.4122,0.6947,2.932,95.7761,1.4623,2.7029,5.3502,0.4773,0.9887 +0,glass,214,9,4.2056,0.6103,0.0928,0.0874,0.3567,11.0639,0.1817,2.5448,0.6271,0.0824,0.9243 +0,ionosphere,351,33,35.8974,0.6259,0.1123,0.1285,0.5312,18.8991,0.3043,2.5635,1.0727,0.1084,1.2895 +0,letter,1600,32,6.25,1.4954,0.3275,0.6169,2.614,82.8181,1.2625,2.7119,4.6007,0.4063,0.9716 +0,lympho,148,18,4.0541,0.5972,0.0854,0.0476,0.1826,8.0602,0.1397,2.5423,0.4654,0.0658,1.3465 +0,mnist,7603,100,9.2069,7.1153,2.5733,2.926,12.5522,398.1935,5.9011,3.3021,21.9616,2.5411,2.3247 +0,musk,3062,166,3.1679,2.7724,1.497,1.1978,5.0226,162.3098,2.4641,2.8737,9.0085,1.3459,1.257 +0,optdigits,5216,64,2.8758,4.8944,1.4061,2.0056,8.4954,272.4242,4.0775,3.0446,15.0324,1.4741,1.5397 +0,pendigits,6870,16,2.2707,6.2045,1.5857,2.6522,11.2758,351.1087,5.0944,3.1435,19.4177,1.4525,1.6487 +0,pima,768,8,34.8958,0.6682,0.1511,0.2856,1.2059,39.4155,0.6038,2.5746,2.265,0.1911,0.8936 +0,satellite,6435,36,31.6395,5.5677,1.5037,2.4127,10.2862,326.4625,4.8506,3.109,18.271,1.5682,1.8521 +0,satimage-2,5803,36,1.2235,4.8854,1.2301,2.177,9.2547,295.0104,4.2977,3.0388,16.3908,1.4015,1.6889 +0,shuttle,49097,9,7.1511,54.5689,12.518,18.359,78.2603,2472.4886,36.2362,7.0884,138.645,12.3863,9.7518 +0,vertebral,240,6,12.5,0.6014,0.0915,0.0858,0.3476,12.7787,0.2069,2.5141,0.7572,0.0818,0.8338 +0,vowels,1456,12,3.4341,1.4241,0.2844,0.545,2.3138,74.3473,1.1114,2.6293,4.2116,0.3274,0.9719 +0,wbc,378,30,5.5556,0.6167,0.1117,0.1449,0.6031,20.4393,0.3196,2.5309,1.2024,0.1141,1.2352 diff --git a/examples/auto_model_selection_example/updated_dataset_information.csv b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/updated_dataset_information.csv new file mode 100644 index 00000000..44169522 --- /dev/null +++ b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/updated_dataset_information.csv @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +Dataset,Domain,Data Type,Number of Instances,Number of Attributes,Missing Values,Area,Mean,Std Dev,Min,Max +arrhythmia,Medical,Multivariate,452,279,Yes,Cardiology,10.125108197144888,6.546008639872744,-242.4,780.0 +glass,Forensic Science,Multivariate,214,9,No,Material Identification,11.265851609553478,0.6879278145483789,0.0,75.41 +ionosphere,Astronomy,Multivariate,351,34,No,Space,0.2552029672796339,0.5251381269031516,-1.0,1.0 +lympho,Medical,Multivariate,148,18,No,Oncology,2.0746996996997,0.6997776820615417,1.0,8.0 diff --git a/examples/auto_model_selection_example/with_note_selection_results/output.json b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/with_note_selection_results/output.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2ac242ba --- /dev/null +++ b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/with_note_selection_results/output.json @@ -0,0 +1,3436 @@ +{ + "pima": [ + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, excels in handling imbalanced data, and performs well in the medical domain. It is also designed for high-dimensional datasets and short training time, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of noisy and medium data size. Although it requires high memory, its other strengths outweigh this weakness given the CPU and low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular and medical data, which matches our domain requirements. Furthermore, it is well-suited for imbalanced data, despite the dataset being noisy, which aligns with our characteristics. Even though AE1SVM usually requires high memory and is strong in GPU processing, its strengths outweigh its weaknesses in terms of imbalanced and tabular data processing. Given that CPU and low memory requirements are crucial, this might not be ideal, but no model perfectly matches all criteria. However, AE1SVM falls within the constraints better than other models due to its applicability to imbalanced tabular datasets in the medical domain." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it effectively handles tabular data and is strong in medical domains. It can handle imbalanced data, which is a characteristic of the given dataset. Although it has weaknesses such as issues with noisy data and high memory requirements, it is still the best fit given the constraints of CPU and low memory. Its ability to work with imbalanced data and strong performance with tabular data, especially in medical contexts, makes it the most suitable model among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is suitable for medium-sized tabular medical datasets with noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. While AutoEncoder has a weakness with imbalanced data, its strength in handling noisy data and healthcare applications makes it a better fit than other models in the list. Additionally, it supports GPU acceleration, which can mitigate the CPU and low memory constraints. The model's capability to process high-dimensional data efficiently while maintaining short training time also aligns well with the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data, which is the data type in the dataset. It can effectively handle imbalanced data, which is crucial given the dataset's characteristics. This model is also applicable to medical domains. Although it usually requires high memory and can work with GPUs, its ability to handle high dimensionality and its short training time make it suitable for medium-sized datasets. While noisy data is a weakness for AE1SVM, the need for low memory usage is accommodated as 'low memory' is a requirement, making it a balanced choice given the alternatives." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it supports tabular medical data and performs well with imbalanced datasets, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, AE1SVM is less dependent on GPU and high memory, aligning with the constraints of using a CPU and low memory. While it has some weaknesses with noisy data, its strengths in handling imbalanced, sparse, and high-dimensional data outweigh this for this specific use case." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is the most suitable model as it is strong in handling tabular data and medical domains, which align with the dataset properties. It can effectively manage high dimensionality and noisy data, both of which are characteristics of the given dataset. Additionally, it is well-suited for imbalanced data, making it a good fit for the dataset's unique challenges. Although it prefers GPU usage, its scalability to large datasets is advantageous, despite it having high memory use like other high-performance models. Furthermore, ALAD aligns with the budget constraint since it handles CPU although it prefers GPU, which fits within the dataset's requirement for low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset's characteristics of being medium-sized, tabular, in the medical domain, noisy, imbalanced, and low memory requirement. It excels in handling tabular and medical data, accommodates imbalanced datasets, and copes well with sparse data which is beneficial for potential noise. Although its performance on noisy data and CPU compatibility are noted weaknesses, the other models have greater issues with the dataset requirements, especially concerning medium data size, low memory, and CPU. AE1SVM strikes a balance in fitting the dataset's demands, including short training times and scalability to larger datasets when needed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for tabular data in the medical domain, as it is robust to imbalanced data and can handle noisy data effectively. Despite its preference for high memory and GPU, it demonstrates good scalability to medium-sized datasets. While it is not specifically optimized for CPUs or low-memory environments, its strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data issues make it the most viable option from the list given the requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset involves tabular and medical data, which aligns with AutoEncoder's strengths in handling healthcare and high-dimensional tabular data. It can manage noisy data and perform well on medium-sized datasets. Additionally, it does not have significant weaknesses in terms of low memory or CPU usage. Despite its weakness with imbalanced data, it aligns better with the requirements than the other models, which have more significant conflicts with the dataset's constraints and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it has strengths in handling tabular and imbalanced data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also aligns with the medical domain requirement and works well with high-dimensional data. Despite its weaknesses in handling noisy data, it is among the options that fit best given the constraint of CPU and low memory because of its short training time. Other models either lack strength in handling tabular data or imbalanced data, or are not suitable for low-memory CPU environments." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is chosen because it aligns well with the dataset tags, especially in handling tabular data and noisy data, which are crucial for the medical domain. Although it operates on GPU with high memory requirements and may have long training times, it is well-suited for dealing with high dimensionality and sparse datasets, which are typical in medical datasets. Its ability to handle imbalanced data and large datasets also make it more fitting for the given dataset characteristics than other models, even with a CPU constraint." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it handles tabular data effectively, which is crucial for the dataset type, and it is well-suited for CPU processing with low memory requirements. Despite its weakness with noisy data, it excels with imbalanced data and has short training times. This makes it a balanced choice given the dataset properties and computational constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the best choice because it handles tabular data effectively and is suitable for medical domains, which aligns with our dataset tags. It is robust to imbalanced data and performs well with sparse data, crucial for handling the data characteristics. Despite its weakness in dealing with noisy data and requirement for high memory, it compensates with its ability to handle high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets. The mention of CPU constraints amongst its weaknesses is less concerning as it can utilize GPU resources, and given the medium data size, its strengths outweigh its weaknesses in our scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and handles imbalanced datasets well, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which are beneficial given the medium-sized dataset and low memory constraint. Although it is somewhat computationally intensive and sensitive to hyperparameters, it compensates with its strengths in handling imbalanced data. Despite the noise in the data, LUNAR\u2019s ability to quickly iterate and scale efficiently makes it the most suitable choice among the given models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it handles tabular and medical data effectively, which aligns with the dataset domain. It also performs well on imbalanced data which is a characteristic of the dataset. Even though noisy data is a weakness, AE1SVM's strengths in high dimensionality and scalable datasets help mitigate this. Despite its high memory usage, the short training time and applicability to imbalanced data make it preferable, especially with a medium-sized dataset, assuming manageable memory constraints can be accommodated." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It can handle imbalanced data, a crucial characteristic of the dataset, and supports medical applications. While it requires high memory and GPU, which contradicts the low memory requirement, it is one of the few models capable of handling tabular, imbalanced, and medical datasets among the given options. Its ability to manage high dimensionality and scalable large datasets further complements the medium data size. Despite potential challenges with noisy data, it balances other factors more effectively than the alternatives." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for medium-sized, tabular data with noise, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite having a weakness with imbalanced data, it is efficient on CPU, which is crucial for low-memory environments, and it has strengths in handling noisy, high-dimensional data, making it a reasonable choice for this medical dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is well-suited for tabular data and can handle medical data, making it applicable to the domain. Its strengths include handling imbalanced data and compatibility with tabular data, which align well with the dataset's characteristics. Although AE1SVM struggles with noisy data, it has robust capabilities for imbalanced datasets, which is more critical given the dataset requirements. Despite its need for high memory and GPU, its short training time is advantageous when considering CPU limitations and low memory, making it a favorable option relative to others like MO-GAAL or ALAD that also have high memory needs or longer training times." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it handles tabular data, medical domain, and imbalanced data effectively, which are all key characteristics of our dataset. Additionally, AE1SVM's strength in dealing with high dimensionality and its short training time aligns well with the dataset's characteristics such as noisy data. While AE1SVM has weaknesses with low memory and CPU requirements, the other models have more significant downside impacts for this particular use case. Choosing AE1SVM properly balances the need for managing imbalanced and noisy tabular medical data within a CPU and low-memory environment." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it effectively handles tabular and medical data, which aligns with the dataset type and domain. It also manages imbalanced and high-dimensional data, which are characteristics of the dataset. While AE1SVM has weaknesses regarding noisy data and low memory, its strengths in handling imbalanced data with short training times using GPU make it more suitable for the given CPU and low-memory constraints compared to other models. Additionally, the model's strength in scalable datasets aligns with the medium data size requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model as it handles tabular and imbalanced data well. It is good for medium-sized datasets and has short training times, which aligns with the low memory and CPU requirements. Despite its issues with noisy data, the strengths in handling tabular data and imbalanced datasets make it more applicable compared to other models, none of which meet all dataset requirements without significant trade-offs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE (Variational AutoEncoder) is the most suitable model for this situation due to its strengths in processing tabular data and noisy data, which align with the dataset characteristics. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced data, it still supports the majority of the dataset requirements. It can handle the medium-sized data on a CPU, and its short training time is beneficial given the low memory environment. The other models either do not support tabular data or have more conflicting weaknesses with the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is a suitable model for the given dataset properties. It specializes in handling imbalanced and high-dimensional tabular data, which is crucial for medical datasets. Despite its longer training time and some weaknesses with CPU and low memory, its strengths in handling medical, tabular, and imbalanced data align well with the dataset tags. The weakness concerning noisy data is noted, but its ability to process imbalanced, tabular data efficiently using a single-class SVM approach makes it the most fitting choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and constraints. It supports tabular data, which aligns well with the data type. Additionally, it effectively handles noisy and imbalanced data, which are characteristics of the dataset. Despite its high memory requirements, ALAD's ability to utilize tabular data and its adaptability to medical domains makes it an appropriate choice, given the medium data size and the constraints surrounding CPU and low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular and medical domains, which align with the dataset properties. It effectively handles imbalanced data and supports tabular data, which are crucial given the dataset's characteristics. Although it requires high memory and has some weaknesses with noisy data, it offers strong capabilities for scalable datasets, high-dimensionality handling, and short training times, which is beneficial under CPU constraints. Its strengths align closely with the dataset's needs despite minimal weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is highly suitable as it effectively handles tabular data, which is the type of dataset in question. It also manages imbalanced and medical data well. Although it has strengths in high memory and GPU contexts, its capability with imbalanced datasets and tabular data for a medium-sized dataset outweigh its weaknesses in low memory and CPU only situations. Given the noisy data characteristic of the dataset, AE1SVM's weaknesses include handling such scenarios, but it remains the least problematic compared to other models listed, notably AnoGAN and MO-GAAL, which are less compatible with tabular data and imbalanced datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is chosen because it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics, particularly for handling tabular and imbalanced data. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, its strengths in imbalanced data, short training time, and compatibility with GPU usage signify that it can efficiently process the medium-sized tabular medical dataset. It also requires less memory compared to models like AE1SVM and MO-GAAL, fitting the CPU and low-memory requirements. Overall, SO-GAAL provides a balanced trade-off for the specified requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized with tabular data from the medical domain and has characteristics of noisy and imbalanced data. The key requirements include low memory usage and CPU compatibility. While VAE has some weaknesses on imbalanced data and CPU usage, it effectively handles tabular data, biomedical (healthcare) applications, and noisy data which is a prominent feature of the given dataset. VAE's ability to handle healthcare, noisy data, and tabular data makes it a favorable choice, despite the weaknesses regarding CPU usage and the imbalanced data characteristic." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data and can handle noisy data, which are relevant to the dataset characteristics. Although ALAD typically requires a GPU, the dataset's medium size and the fact that it effectively manages imbalanced data further support its suitability for this medical dataset. Additionally, even though ALAD is not naturally suited to a CPU or low memory environments, its overarching compatibility with the dataset's requirements outweighs these limitations given the constraints of the other available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is selected due to its strength in handling tabular data, which is the data type present, and its ability to manage noisy data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It also supports high dimensionality, which is beneficial for potential complex medical datasets. Although it requires high memory, the short training time and scalability to large datasets make it advantageous for the given medium-sized dataset. It's more aligned with the medical domain and imbalanced data compared to other models, except MO-GAAL, which has a weakness in handling noisy data and low memory requirement, an important constraint for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is the most suitable choice for the given dataset characteristics. It is strong in handling tabular data and medical domain applications, which aligns with the dataset properties. It can manage noisy data and has scalability for larger datasets, which matches the medium-size data tag. Although it has a weakness in long training time, it does scale well and can handle the noisy and imbalanced nature of the data while using GPU, which is advantageous given the CPU and low memory requirements highlighted as additional constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it aligns well with the dataset properties: it supports tabular data, handles imbalanced data effectively, and is capable of running on a CPU under low memory conditions. Moreover, it boasts short training times and scalability to medium-sized datasets, fitting well within the additional requirements specified. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data, this is less of a concern than the weaknesses of other models which either require high memory or are unsuitable for tabular and imbalanced data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data, handles noisy data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. It's well-suited for the medical domain and applicable to medium-sized, imbalanced datasets, which are requirements of the dataset. Although ALAD has limitations on CPU and low memory, it balances by being scalable to large datasets and is aligned with the requirement for tabular data in a medical context. Despite some CPU weaknesses, the ability to handle noisy and imbalanced data combined with its strength in medical applications makes it the most fitting choice from the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is best suited for this dataset as it handles tabular and high-dimensional data effectively, which aligns with the given data type. Its strengths include dealing with imbalanced data, which is crucial for this medical dataset. Despite its weaknesses in handling noisy data, it offers short training time and scales well to large datasets, meeting the requirements of using a CPU and working with low memory. Although it struggles with noisy data, its strengths align most closely with the other key requirements of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is selected because it handles tabular data and noisy data effectively, aligning well with the dataset properties. Despite its weakness in CPU performance, ALAD's capabilities with tabular and medical data, along with scalability to large datasets, make it a suitable choice for a medium-sized dataset. ALAD's strength in handling imbalanced data is another reason for its selection, matching one of the key dataset characteristics. While its weakness includes long training times and CPU performance, these drawbacks are outweighed by its alignment with the dataset requirements for medical, tabular, and noisy data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice because it effectively handles tabular medical data while dealing with imbalanced datasets, a key characteristic of this dataset. Although it is weak against noisy data, this limitation is shared by multiple models, and AE1SVM offers strong support for high dimensionality. The model's efficient training time and capacity to scale to large datasets align well with the 'medium' data size requirement. Despite being CPU-bound, AE1SVM's capabilities on tabular data and imbalance handling outweigh the disadvantage, making it the best fit among the list provided without requiring high GPU resources." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the best choice for the given dataset properties and constraints. It supports tabular data and is capable of handling imbalanced data, which are key characteristics of the data. Additionally, its strength in dealing with high dimensionality aligns with the complexity often found in medical datasets. Despite the dataset's noisy nature, the model's strength in dealing with imbalanced data and having a short training time makes it still favorable over others. While it has weaknesses with CPU and low memory, the lack of better alternatives for the specific challenges of the dataset (like imbalanced data, CPU, and low memory constraints) makes AE1SVM a more suitable choice compared to others, which either don't handle tabular data well or struggle with imbalanced data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable choice considering the dataset properties and model characteristics. It is capable of handling imbalanced data, which is a critical characteristic of the dataset. Although it's not particularly strong in handling noisy data, it is superior to other models in managing the imbalanced data aspect, which is more pronounced in this context. Given that noisy data is less significant than the imbalanced property here, SO-GAAL outweighs other models like AutoEncoder or AE1SVM, which either struggle with imbalanced data or cannot be efficiently run on CPU resources. Furthermore, SO-GAAL offers short training times matching the 'low memory' and 'CPU' resource constraints specified." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset as it handles tabular data and imbalanced data well. It is also strong in handling medical data. While it has a weakness with noisy data, it provides high scalability to large datasets which accommodates the medium-sized dataset. Despite its GPU and high memory preferences, AE1SVM's strengths in imbalanced and tabular data make it a better match compared to others. DevNet, although suitable for noisy data, is not ideal for tabular data. The combination of strengths in AE1SVM aligns more closely with the dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset properties of medium-sized, tabular, medical data with noise and imbalance. It excels with tabular and medical data, handles imbalanced data well, and leverages the strength of GPU for short training times. Although it requires high memory, which could be a concern, it generally accommodates large datasets efficiently. While it has weaknesses with small data sizes and noise, its ability to manage imbalanced datasets and suitability for tabular data make it the best compromise given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it supports tabular data, accommodates imbalanced data well, and is strong in the medical domain, which aligns with the dataset tags. Although it requires high memory, it handles medium-sized datasets efficiently and has a short training time, which compensates for the memory requirement. Despite its weakness with noisy data, its advantages in handling imbalanced and medical data make it the most suitable choice from the given list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected based on its strengths in handling tabular data and imbalanced data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Given the constraints of using CPU and low memory, LUNAR offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Although it has weaknesses in handling noisy data, the other models have more critical weaknesses concerning the dataset properties or computational resources. LUNAR's strengths and adaptability make it the most suitable model for the given requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it handles tabular data effectively and is suitable for medical domains. It has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is crucial for this dataset characteristic. Although it requires high memory, it is compatible with CPU requirements. Its support for short training times and scalability to large datasets also aligns well with the dataset size. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, considering other models' limitations, it stands as the best compromise for this dataset's characteristics and additional requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset as it can handle tabular data, has strengths in the healthcare domain, and deals effectively with noisy data and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. While it has a weakness with imbalanced data, it accommodates noisy data and is scalable to large datasets with short training time, making it suitable for medium data sizes. Despite preferences for GPU usage, its ability to work with healthcare data and handle noise makes it a better fit compared to others for the specified requirements, albeit the low memory constraint." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, medical, noisy, and imbalanced, with constraints on CPU usage and low memory. LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Although it is weaker on noisy data, it offers low memory usage and CPU efficiency, and it has short training time which makes it suitable given the additional requirements. Despite its weaker handling of noise, its strengths in handling tabular and imbalanced data make it a slightly more suitable choice compared to other models, given the dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular medical datasets with noisy data, even though it has weaknesses with imbalanced data and is not optimal for CPU usage. Its strengths in handling tabular data, noisy data, and healthcare applications make it a strong candidate for the dataset context. Despite its CPU weakness, given the overall requirements, VAE provides a balanced option for analyzing medical data with limited memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data and medical domains, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It can address noisy data, which is important for the medical domain represented here. Despite its weakness in low memory and using CPU, it can manage imbalanced data efficiently, which is crucial given the dataset's features. Additionally, it can scale well to larger datasets that suit the medium-sized dataset requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is chosen because it supports tabular data and is well-suited for handling noisy and sparse data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. While it requires high memory, it excels in handling imbalanced data, a notable characteristic of the dataset. Although ALAD's high memory requirement conflicts with low memory needs, its effectiveness in other areas, such as scalability and handling medical domain challenges, makes it the most suitable choice among the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it supports tabular data and is well-suited to handle imbalanced data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It also fits within the 'medical' domain and is capable of leveraging GPU for training. While it has a weakness for noisy data and is not optimized for low memory environments, its strengths in tabular and imbalanced data make it the most suitable among the given models, as others fail to fully align with these crucial dataset characteristics." + } + ], + "cardio": [ + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset since it caters well to tabular data with high dimensionality and is suited for medical applications. Although it typically works better with high memory and GPU resources, its ability to efficiently handle sparse data and scalability to large datasets makes it a strong candidate. Even though CPU and low memory are requirements, the dataset's characteristics of medium size and high dimensionality align well with AE1SVM's strengths, providing a balance between feasible implementation and performance." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the given dataset because it handles tabular data and high dimensionality effectively, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is also strong in the healthcare domain, which is relevant given the medical context. Additionally, it has the capability to manage noisy data and can be scalable to large datasets, which makes it efficient even with medium data sizes. Despite its weaknesses in CPU and low memory environments, it still offers short training times and optimal performance on suitable hardware setups like GPUs. Overall, AutoEncoder is the best option that matches the requirements and strengths needed for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties of medium-sized, high-dimensional, tabular medical data, with a requirement for low memory usage on a CPU. AE1SVM's strengths include handling high dimensionality, tabular data, and medical domains, making it fit well with the dataset's characteristics. While it typically requires a GPU for high memory and scaling, it meets the needs for tabular and high-dimensional data, thus aligning best with the provided requirements, despite its CPU and low memory weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given requirements. It supports high dimensionality, tabular data, and has strengths in the medical domain. While it does require high memory, it is scalable to large datasets and provides short training times, which can be advantageous for a medium-sized dataset. The dataset's requirement for low memory is a concern but given the constraints and available options, AE1SVM aligns well with other key dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data within the medical domain and efficiently manages high dimensionality while using low memory resources, aligning with the dataset's constraints and requirements. While it does have a weakness with CPU, it has a short training time and is capable of handling the required types of data without a significant memory overhead. Despite its GPU reliance, its compatibility with tabular data and high dimensionality makes it the best fit given the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling high-dimensional, tabular data in the medical domain, which matches well with the dataset tags. Despite its requirement for high memory, its compatibility with tabular data, scalability to large datasets, and short training time are beneficial. Additionally, it can be effective for high dimensionality data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Although it primarily utilizes GPU, its strengths align best with the dataset requirements compared to the other models available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data in the medical domain, which are the characteristics of the dataset. It handles high dimensionality effectively and works well with tabular and medical data, despite its preference for GPU over CPU. It also offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which can be beneficial even with medium-sized datasets. Although it has weaknesses concerning CPU usage and low memory, its strengths align closely with the dataset's requirements and make it the best choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is chosen because it effectively handles high dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It is suitable for the healthcare/medical domain and can utilize a GPU, aligning well with the medium data size requirement. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data and high memory requirements, it remains as one of the best fits due to the dataset's specific need for handling high dimensionality efficiently and its scalability to larger datasets. Additionally, the models with higher compatibility with 'CPU' and 'low memory' requirements either do not handle high dimensionality as effectively or have significant weaknesses in tabular data handling, making Deep SVDD a balanced choice overall." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected because it supports tabular data and handles high dimensionality well, which matches the dataset's properties. It performs efficiently on healthcare data and can work with noisy data, which is typical in medical datasets. While it usually operates better with GPUs and consumes high memory, its short training time and scalability are advantageous. Despite its weakness of not being optimized for CPU, it still stands out among the available options given the balance between dataset needs and its strengths." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is a suitable choice because it supports tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset properties. Additionally, it operates well with medium-sized data and low memory requirements on a CPU. Although LUNAR has high memory weaknesses, the need for CPU and short training time align well with the dataset's additional requirements. It avoids weaknesses such as GPU-only strengths or long training time, making it an optimal choice given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties as it handles tabular data and high dimensionality effectively. Although it generally requires high memory and utilizes GPU, these characteristics should be manageable given that the data size is medium. Additionally, it can handle healthcare data, which aligns well with the medical domain context. Despite its preference for GPU, the medium data size and VAE's ability to process high dimensionality and tabular data make it a strong candidate. The CPU and low memory requirements may require customization or optimization, but VAE's other strengths align well with the key dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it is well-suited for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data in the medical domain. It handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, and is efficient with short training times. Although it requires high memory and prefers GPU, which is not ideal for a CPU-focused requirement, its strengths align closely with the dataset's nature, particularly for high dimensional medical tabular data. It is scalable to large datasets and suitable for healthcare applications, making it the best choice among the available models despite the low memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for the given dataset because it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It handles high dimensionality, a key characteristic of the dataset, and is strong in the medical domain. While VAE typically relies on a GPU, its short training time is an advantage given the medium data size. Although VAE has a weakness in being reliant on CPU, it is one of the few models in the list that supports the main dataset requirements, especially for a medium-sized, high-dimensional medical dataset, despite its high memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It is capable of handling medium-sized data and has a short training time. While it generally prefers GPU, the model's compatibility with healthcare and its strength in handling high-dimensional data make it a good choice, despite the requirement for low memory. Other models have more pronounced weaknesses concerning the dataset properties or the requirement for CPU use." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it effectively handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It also supports medical domains, making it well-suited for this application. While the model has a weakness with CPU and low memory, which are additional requirements, it still aligns better with the dataset tags compared to other models that either do not support tabular data or have significant weaknesses with medium-sized datasets and high dimensionality." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling tabular data, particularly in the medical domain with high dimensionality. It is also efficient with noisy data, which might be present in the dataset, and it has a short training time. Although it is not optimal for CPU and low memory usage, among the options, it offers the best balance in terms of dealing with high dimensional data and scalability suitable for a medium-sized dataset within the constraints provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is best suited for the given medical tabular dataset with high dimensionality. Although it requires high memory and is typically implemented on a GPU, its strengths align well with tabular data, healthcare domain, and high dimensionality, which are critical features of this dataset. Despite its weakness in CPU utilization and low memory environments, it has short training time and handles large datasets effectively, making it a suitable option given the characteristics listed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable because it effectively handles tabular data and high dimensionality, which are characteristics of our dataset. Despite requiring high memory, it can run on a GPU which alleviates CPU and memory constraints. Additionally, it has short training time and scalability to large datasets, fitting well with the dataset's size and dimensions. Although it has limitations with imbalanced data, this is less critical compared to the strengths it offers concerning dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data with medical domain applications. Although it requires high memory, it is still the best fit because it handles high dimensionality, medical tabular data effectively, and offers scalability to large datasets. Its ability to manage imbalanced and sparse data also aligns with potential characteristics of medical datasets, making it a viable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it matches the dataset characteristics of high dimensionality and tabular data while being capable of handling medical data effectively. Although it has a weakness for CPU usage and low memory environments, its strengths align well with the dataset requirements, including the capability to manage high dimensionality in tabular formats. Other models either have significant weaknesses related to the provided dataset tags or are less suited to the domain and data type attributes." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular with high dimensionality in the medical domain, and the requirements include low memory and CPU processing. The AutoEncoder has strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, supports short training times, and has applicability in healthcare. Despite its weakness with low CPU, it aligns closely with the strengths required for the dataset characteristics when weighed against its competitors, which either face more severe constraints concerning CPU usage or memory requirements. AutoEncoder's proven effectiveness in similar high-dimensional and healthcare-related tasks makes it a suitable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice because it handles tabular data efficiently and is tailored for high dimensionality, both of which are pertinent characteristics of the dataset. Despite its computational intensity, the strengths such as scalable to large datasets compatibility, support for tabular data, and short training times align well with the dataset requirements. Additionally, LUNAR works efficiently on CPU environments and does not have constraints on memory, making it a suitable option when considering the given requirements of low memory and CPU usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and from the medical domain with high dimensionality, and it needs to be processed with low memory on a CPU. AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data and high dimensionality which fits well for the medical domain. Although it generally requires high memory and GPU, it still fulfills more criteria regarding data types and scalability compared to other models. It has a short training time, making it efficient for medium-sized datasets despite the constraints of requiring low memory and CPU." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected because it is strong with tabular data, healthcare applications, and handles high dimensionality well, aligning with the dataset characteristics. Although it typically requires high memory and GPU resources for training, which can be a weakness, it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it efficient with medium-sized datasets. Its support for noisy data is, in addition, useful for medical datasets, making it the most suitable choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data and the medical domain, meeting the key dataset characteristics. Although it requires high memory and GPU, it can handle high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which are the primary dataset requirements. Additionally, it offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which align with the medium data size requirement. The weaknesses related to CPU and low memory are less concerning given the overlap of strengths with the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for this dataset because it can handle high dimensionality and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Although it typically requires high memory and is GPU-optimized, among the available models, it is the most compatible with medical data. While its limitation of requiring high memory is noted, it does not specifically mention CPU as a weakness, making it more feasible for a CPU-centric requirement compared to other options. Its ability to manage imbalanced data and scalability to large datasets further makes it a strong candidate." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it excels in handling high dimensional, tabular data, which is aligned with the dataset's characteristics. It supports medical domains and requires high memory, aligning well with a medium data size. Although it has limitations with CPU usage, its strengths in high dimensionality and tabular data make it the most compatible with the dataset's requirements compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is the most suitable choice because it effectively handles tabular data with high dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, it is capable of scaling to medium-sized datasets as required, and it perfectly aligns with the medical domain context of the data. Even though it requires a GPU and has weaknesses like noisy data handling, the lack of necessity for low memory usage in this context allows Deep SVDD to be the ideal choice over other models that inadequately support CPU or low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality in the medical domain. It can handle high-dimensional datasets efficiently and supports medical and healthcare applications. While it typically requires a GPU and high memory, it offers a short training time and scalable performance for medium-sized datasets. Although the model generally prefers GPU for processing, no other models from the list provide a better match for the dataset characteristics and constraints of CPU and low memory while still being effective for medical applications." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is selected because of its suitability for handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which fits the dataset properties. It also efficiently processes medical data and is well-suited for health applications. Despite its preference for GPU, it requires high memory, which might not perfectly match the low memory requirement; however, its ability to handle noisy data, high dimensionality, and scalability to medium data sizes makes it the most suitable choice among the provided options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable choice for this medical tabular dataset characterized by high dimensionality and medium size, since it supports high dimensionality and performs well on tabular data. While it typically benefits from GPU use and higher memory environments, it is capable of working with tabular healthcare data under the constraints described. Additionally, VAE has a short training time, which aligns with the need for efficiency. Despite its weakness with CPUs and low memory, its strengths align well with the dataset's characteristics in comparison to the other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular datasets, particularly in the medical domain. It supports high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Despite the CPU and low memory requirements, the AutoEncoder is a strong candidate due to its ability to handle high dimensionality and tabular data efficiently, having short training times and high scalability to large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data in the medical domain, especially when there are constraints on memory and CPU usage. While it typically leverages a GPU for best performance, its strengths in handling high dimensionality, and noisy data align well with the dataset properties, whereas its weaknesses do not conflict significantly with the given dataset requirements. Other models either do not handle tabular data well, require high memory, or are more suited for GPU-exclusive operations, making the AutoEncoder the best fit in this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected as it aligns well with the dataset properties, such as tabular data and medium data size. Although it does not explicitly mention the medical domain, its ability to handle tabular data and high dimensionality is suitable given the characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it offers scalability to large datasets and short training time, which are beneficial for handling medium data size efficiently. Even though it has a weakness in noisy data and higher memory requirements, the advantages align more closely with the CPU and low memory constraints, since it is computationally intensive yet capable of effective processing within those constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, fitting the dataset's characteristics of medium data size and high dimensionality. While it generally relies on GPU, it is designed for short training times and scalability to large datasets, which offset the limitation of CPU preference. Despite its weakness with discrete data, VAE's strengths in handling healthcare and medical applications make it a fitting choice given the domain of the dataset. Furthermore, although it is GPU-intensive, the model's efficiency in memory usage relative to the task makes it a viable option for this specific scenario considering the low memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It supports high dimensionality and the tabular data type, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it performs well in the medical domain and has a short training time, suitable for medium data sizes. Although it typically leverages GPU, its ability to handle high dimensional data with low memory makes it an appropriate choice despite the CPU requirement scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is also adept in the medical domain, which is relevant here. Despite its strengths in requiring high memory and GPU, its short training time and ability to handle scalable datasets make it a strong candidate. Although it has a weakness concerning low memory and CPU constraints, it balances these with its capabilities to manage tabular data efficiently in a medium data size context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset involves tabular medical data with high dimensionality and requires low memory usage on a CPU. AutoEncoder is suitable for high-dimensional and tabular data, especially in healthcare. Although it typically benefits from GPU and high memory, its ability to handle large datasets and short training time make it a practical choice given the medium-sized dataset. Despite its weaknesses with small data size and CPU, its strengths more closely align with the dataset features compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is suitable for the dataset because it handles high-dimensional tabular data well, especially in the medical domain. It is optimized for high memory and GPU usage, which is ideal given the low memory requirement where we can still achieve short training time using a time-efficient algorithm. Although the dataset requires CPU compatibility, the strengths of the AutoEncoder in dealing with high-dimensional medical data make it a strong choice, balancing performance with training duration limitations." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for this medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular dataset in the medical domain, even when considering the constraints of CPU usage and low memory. Its strengths align closely with the dataset requirements: it handles tabular data and high dimensionality effectively, and it is known for its scalability and relatively short training times. Despite its preference for GPU, the focus on high dimensionality and tabular data in combination with its strengths outweigh the fact no model perfectly suits the CPU and low memory conditions. The AutoEncoder is therefore the best choice given the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it supports high dimensionality, medical domain, and tabular data, which are key properties of the dataset. It is also efficient for tabular data analysis, despite its weakness in CPU and low memory requirements. However, considering medical domain and tabular data with high dimensionality, AE1SVM can leverage its strengths effectively for this data type, tagging it as the most aligned with the dataset properties among the options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected because it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it is suitable for medical domains and can handle noisy data well, which is often a concern in medical datasets. Although it typically requires high memory, the short training time and scalability make it a good choice for a medium-sized dataset on a CPU with low memory requirements, provided that training configurations are optimized." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the dataset characteristics. It is strong in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, both of which are key aspects of this dataset. Additionally, it supports healthcare/medical domain applications, which aligns with the dataset's domain. It performs well with noisy data (another characteristic of this dataset) and offers short training times, which is beneficial for CPU usage despite being a bit more oriented towards GPU. While it has a noted weakness on small datasets, this dataset is medium-sized, thus mitigating that concern. Though not optimized for low memory, AutoEncoder's other strengths outweigh this consideration when compared to other models on the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is suitable for the dataset because it handles high dimensionality and works well with tabular data, which aligns with the dataset properties. It is also strong in the medical domain and can operate efficiently with medium-sized datasets. Although it has a weakness with CPU usage, it excels in short training time and scalability, making it a good fit for the requirement of low memory usage, even if this could be a concern. Its strengths in working with high-dimensional datasets outweigh its weaknesses for this specific use case." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is well-suited for tabular medical data with high dimensionality, as indicated by its strengths in high dimensionality, healthcare, tabular data, and scalability to large datasets. Although VAE has a weakness on CPUs, given the dataset requirements for CPU and low memory, the VAE may still be a reasonable choice as none of the other models perfectly fit all aspects. VAE's strengths align well with the medical domain and tabular data characteristics, making it a suitable choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is selected because it is suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset properties. It also performs well in healthcare and medical domains and can handle noisy data, which are crucial aspects for the current dataset. Despite its weakness of requiring high memory, it aligns with the low memory requirement under CPU usage better than other model options, as other models have more significant weaknesses regarding CPU and memory usage. Additionally, AutoEncoder offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets, which are advantageous given the medium data size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The AE1SVM model is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties and constraints. It supports high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Moreover, its ability to handle medical data further aligns with the domain. While AE1SVM can operate well with GPUs, the constraint of CPU and low memory is a noted weakness; however, among the options, it still offers the best fit due to its compatibility with medium-sized datasets and short training time. The model also scales to large datasets, which means it can efficiently handle the medium data size without the limitations of small data size affecting its performance." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is suitable for the given tabular medical dataset with high dimensionality and medium data size. It handles high dimensionality well and supports healthcare applications, which aligns with the domain requirement. Despite being optimized for GPU, it demonstrates a short training time and scalability to large datasets which is advantageous for this medium-sized dataset. While it requires high memory, the mention of CPU and low memory may pose constraints, but AutoEncoder's strength in handling high dimensionality and medical tabular data makes it the best fit from the provided list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data well, which fits the dataset tags provided. It is also strong in the medical domain. Although it is typically GPU-optimized and high memory intensive, its strengths align well with the high dimensionality and tabular nature of the data, making it more appropriate for the dataset properties compared to other models. Despite having weaknesses in low memory and CPU environments, these constraints are the least conflicting given the options available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the best choice because it handles tabular data efficiently and is robust for high dimensionality data which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it is suitable for the medical domain and can operate under low memory conditions while having a short training time. Even though it has a weakness for CPU usage, it has overall strengths aligning with the dataset properties, making it more suitable compared to other models which show significant incompatibilities with tabular data or low memory requirements." + } + ], + "mnist": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is particularly well-suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling images and high-dimensional data, which aligns with the characteristics of the dataset. It also supports GPU usage and handles high memory demands well. Additionally, VAE is known for efficient training times and scalability to large datasets, making it suitable for the medium-sized dataset described. Moreover, its application in the education domain makes it a strong fit for the dataset's domain requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is highly suitable for the given dataset as it is strong in handling images and high-dimensional data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, VAE is capable of utilizing GPU and high memory, making it ideal for the dataset's additional requirements. VAE is also noted for handling high dimensionality and noisy data well, which are relevant to the dataset. It supports large datasets and has a short training time, making it efficient for medium-sized educational image data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is highly suitable for a medium-sized image dataset with high dimensionality, requiring GPU and high memory. It is known for handling images and high-dimensional data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, VAE fits well in the education domain and has strengths in handling noisy data, which may be beneficial. The model also supports high memory requirements and has a short training time, aligning well with the dataset's additional constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is highly suitable for image data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It supports GPU usage and requires high memory, aligning with the additional dataset requirements. Moreover, it performs well with noisy data and is optimized for short training times, making it efficient for a medium-sized educational dataset. Its weaknesses, such as struggles with discrete data and imbalanced data, are not matched by the dataset characteristics, making VAE an optimal choice among the provided models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the educational domain and images, is capable of handling high-dimensional data, and benefits from GPU and high memory resources. It also boasts short training times for large datasets, aligning with the dataset's medium size and image nature. While it has weaknesses in handling real-time and discrete data, these are not identified as properties in the dataset tags, making it the most suitable model for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is well-suited for the given dataset properties as it excels with images and high-dimensional data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. The VAE's strengths in education, high memory requirements, GPU utilization, and handling of noisy data align well with the dataset tags. Furthermore, VAE is scalable to large datasets and supports short training times, making it the best choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the best choice as it handles high dimensionality, requires high memory and GPU, aligns well with image data types, and is specifically mentioned to be used in education. It also provides short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is suitable for the medium-sized image dataset described. The weaknesses of VAE, such as issues with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, do not impact this dataset significantly." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for processing image data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It can utilize GPU and high memory, crucial for efficient performance with the given requirements. Additionally, VAE's strength in handling noisy data and short training time make it an ideal choice for an educational domain dataset that is medium-sized and potentially noisy. Other models have weaknesses with image data or don't align as closely with the dataset's needs in terms of GPU and memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is described as medium-sized, consists of images, has high dimensionality, and requires GPU and high memory resources. The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model aligns well with these dataset characteristics. It is designed to handle images and high-dimensional data, works efficiently on GPUs, and can manage large datasets given its scalability and short training time. Additionally, VAE is suited for the educational domain, which is a key aspect of the dataset. While VAE has limitations with discrete or categorical data, these are not relevant in this context, making VAE the most suitable choice from the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for working with images, especially in the education domain, which often involves high-dimensional data. The dataset requires high memory and is GPU compatible, aligning with VAE's strengths. Additionally, VAE is capable of handling large datasets efficiently, has a short training time, and can manage noisy data. These characteristics align well with the dataset tags provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for medium-sized image datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties. It leverages GPUs for efficient computation, supports high memory usage, and offers short training times. The model's strengths in high-dimensional image data and its applicability in the educational domain make it the most suitable choice from the list, despite minor weaknesses like handling imbalanced data or sparse data, which do not apply to the current scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is optimal for this medium-sized image dataset from the education domain due to its strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and its capability to leverage GPU and high memory effectively. It offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it well-suited for educational data with potential complexity and volume. Additionally, VAE's ability to handle noisy data aligns well with the dataset characteristics, ensuring robust performance." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for the given dataset properties as it excels in handling images with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It also supports GPU usage and requires high memory, both of which align with the additional requirements. Furthermore, VAE is applicable to the education domain and has a short training time, making it a practical choice with scalability to large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it is well-suited for high-dimensional image data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is also specifically mentioned as an appropriate model for the education domain. Additionally, VAE can handle noisy data, utilizes a GPU for its processes, supports high memory requirements, and is efficient with large datasets - all of which align with the dataset tags. Although it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and certain real-time or sparse datasets, these do not conflict with the given dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is specifically designed for image data and supports high dimensionality, aligning perfectly with the dataset characteristics. It can handle noisy data, which is beneficial for image datasets that might have artifacts or variations. Additionally, VAE is compatible with GPU and high memory requirements, making it feasible for medium-sized datasets that may demand substantial computational resources. Its short training time and scalability to large datasets further enhance its suitability for scenarios within the educational domain that may involve iterative development and deployment." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it specifically excels in handling images and high dimensionality, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it supports GPU and high memory requirements, important for efficient processing of the images with the given hardware constraints. Unlike other models such as DevNet or LUNAR which are weak with images, or MO-GAAL which has issues with interpretability, the VAE is well-suited for educational image datasets, making it the optimal choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for medium-sized image datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties. It excels in handling image data, supports GPU and high memory requirements, and offers short training time, making it efficient for educational applications. Additionally, its ability to manage high dimensionality and noisy data further aligns with the dataset characteristics, making it the most suitable choice from the given model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is well-suited for this dataset as it has strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and education domain, which aligns perfectly with the dataset properties. It is optimized for use with GPUs and supports high memory requirements, which matches the additional requirements of the dataset. Additionally, it can manage large datasets with short training times, ensuring efficiency in model training. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, which are not relevant to this dataset, VAE provides good generalization capabilities for high-dimensional imagery data in educational contexts." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is a suitable choice because it is well-suited for handling images, which are high-dimensional data. It also supports the education domain, aligns with the high dimensionality characteristic, and can efficiently utilize a GPU for processing. Moreover, VAE handles high memory requirements and performs well on medium-sized datasets with short training times, making it highly compatible with the dataset's properties and additional requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It excels with images and handles high dimensionality efficiently, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it benefits from GPU support and high memory usage, which matches the additional dataset requirements. Given that the data size is medium, the model's ability to work well with large datasets without requiring real-time data makes it a strong fit. Its short training time is an added advantage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and the educational domain, coupled with its ability to utilize GPU and high memory effectively. Additionally, it offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns perfectly with the dataset's requirements. The dataset's medium size and lack of specific characteristics such as sparseness or imbalance make VAE's weaknesses less significant in this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, image-based, high-dimensional, and requires GPU and high memory, which aligns well with VAE's strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and utilizing GPU and high memory efficiently. VAE also supports education datasets and offers short training time, making it suitable for medium-sized datasets. Despite its weakness with imbalanced data, there is no evidence suggesting the dataset suffers from this issue, making VAE the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset as it specifically addresses requirements such as image data, high dimensionality, and high memory, which align with the dataset characteristics. It can efficiently process image datasets in the education domain, supporting high dimensional data in a GPU environment. Additionally, VAE offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it an excellent choice given the medium data size and other requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties which include images, medium data size, high dimensionality, and requires GPU and high memory. VAE excels in handling images and high dimensional data, it requires a GPU and supports high memory use, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. Moreover, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which adds flexibility for scalability beyond medium-sized data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It handles images and high-dimensional data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, VAE supports GPU and requires high memory, matching the additional requirements. Its short training time and scalability to large datasets make it a suitable choice for a medium-sized dataset in the education domain. While it has some weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, these do not majorly impact the suitability for the given dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It excels with images, handles high dimensionality, and is compatible with educational domains. Additionally, VAE supports GPU and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. The strengths of VAE, including short training time and scalability to large datasets, further make it an ideal choice over other models despite its weakness with discrete or categorical data and real-time use, which are not major considerations for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is highly suitable as it excels with image data and high dimensionality, aligns well with the educational domain, and benefits from GPU and high memory, which are necessary given the additional requirements. Its short training time and scalability to large datasets also make it well-suited for a medium-sized dataset in this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for this scenario as it is well-suited for image data, which is a dataset tag. VAE also supports high dimensionality and requires GPU and high memory, aligning with the additional requirements. Its strengths in handling educational domain data and its scalability to large datasets align well with the dataset properties. The weaknesses of VAE, such as issues with discrete data and imbalance, do not conflict with the dataset properties provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is highly suitable for the given dataset properties. It is designed to handle images, works well with high dimensionality, and is specifically tailored for domains like education. It supports GPU and high memory requirements, which align with the additional dataset requirements. Additionally, VAE is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it a strong match for a medium-sized dataset requiring efficient computation. Although it struggles with discrete data and real-time applications, these weaknesses do not conflict with the current dataset properties, making VAE the most appropriate choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It is well-suited for image data and can handle high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, VAE is optimized for scenarios requiring high memory and GPU usage, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. Furthermore, VAE's strengths in domains like education and high dimensionality make it a strong candidate for this application, especially since it supports short training times and scalability to handle medium-sized datasets effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for the dataset due to its strengths in handling images and high dimensionality, which align with the dataset characteristics. It also supports GPU usage and high memory requirements. Furthermore, VAE has short training time and scales well to large datasets, which caters to the medium data size specified. Additionally, it is effective in domains like education, which matches the domain tag of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is characterized by medium data size, high dimensionality, and consists of images, which makes it suitable for models that are designed to work well with images and handle high dimensionality. VAE possesses strengths in processing images, handling high dimensional data, and education domain applications. It also supports GPU and high memory, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. Moreover, VAE is capable of handling noisy data, offers short training time, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable choice for this dataset. It aligns well with the dataset properties, particularly given the medium data size and the high dimensionality of images, which are within its strengths. VAE handles images efficiently and is well-suited for educational domain applications. It also supports GPU and high memory requirements, ensuring optimal performance. Additionally, VAE has a short training time and scalability, making it useful for datasets of this size and type. While other models have some overlapping strengths, VAE stands out due to its specific alignment with the educational domain and image data characteristics, as well as its robustness against high dimensionality and noise." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset and task requirements. It handles images and high dimensionality well, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. VAE also supports GPU usage and requires high memory, both of which are noted requirements. It has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Furthermore, VAE's strengths in the education domain specifically align with the dataset's domain tag, making it an optimal choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized datasets consisting of images, as it is specifically strong in handling high-dimensional data types common in education. It efficiently utilizes GPU capabilities and high memory, aligning perfectly with the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, VAE offers short training times and effective scalability to large datasets, which is advantageous for datasets with high dimensionality." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling images and high dimensionality, which align with the dataset properties. It also fits within the educational domain and has the capability to leverage GPU for processing high memory requirements. Additionally, it has a relatively short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it efficient for medium-sized datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a strong candidate due to its suitability for image data and its capability to handle high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It also supports GPU and high memory requirements, which are additional requirements for the dataset. The VAE model has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it well-suited for the medium-sized dataset in an educational domain. Additionally, VAE's strengths in handling noise and working with image data make it the best fit among the models listed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties because it excels in handling images with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset's characteristics, while also supporting GPU and high memory requirements. It is also scalable to large datasets, making it a strong choice for educational domains where high dimensionality is involved. Additionally, VAE's short training time is advantageous compared to others with long training durations that do not sufficiently align with the dataset's needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is highly suitable because it has strengths that align closely with the dataset properties: it is effective for high-dimensional image data, fits well within the education domain, and leverages GPUs and high memory, which match the additional requirements. Additionally, it handles large datasets and noisy data efficiently, making it the best choice given the specified dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the best choice for this dataset as it is well-suited for images and benefits from high dimensionality, both of which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it requires high memory and can leverage GPU, aligning perfectly with the additional requirements. VAE has short training times and can handle large datasets, making it an efficient option for the medium-sized dataset. The model is also applicable to the education domain and tolerates noisy data, making it an ideal fit considering the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties due to its strengths in handling images and high-dimensional data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, VAE is optimized for high memory environments and utilizes GPUs, making it appropriate for educational applications that may involve extensive computations. While it may not be suited for discrete data, the primary requirement here is image data processing, where VAE excels. Furthermore, VAE allows for short training times and can manage large datasets effectively, fulfilling the dataset\u2019s additional requirements of high memory and GPU utilization." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is the most suitable model because it excels in handling image data and high-dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset properties. It is also optimized for scenarios that require GPU and high memory usage, matching the additional requirements. VAE is well-suited for educational domains and has a short training time, which is beneficial given the medium data size. Its ability to process large datasets effectively and its strengths in handling noisy data further make it a strong candidate for this task." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model as it effectively handles image data with high dimensionality, meets the requirement for GPU and high memory, and supports educational domains. VAE's strengths align with the dataset's needs, including short training time and scalability to large datasets. It is specifically mentioned as strong in images and education, making it a top choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is a suitable choice because it is strong in handling image data which is high-dimensional and requires high memory, making it compatible with the dataset characteristics. It supports GPU training for efficient computation which aligns with the additional requirements of the dataset. Furthermore, it has strengths in domains related to education and it can efficiently work on medium-sized datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for images with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also supports high memory and GPU requirements, as specified in the additional requirements. VAE demonstrates strong performance in educational domains and has short training times, making it a practical choice given the dataset's medium size. Moreover, its ability to handle large datasets and noisy data further complements the dataset properties, making it the most suitable choice from the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for this medium-sized image dataset in the education domain because it supports high dimensionality and has strengths in handling images. It also leverages GPU and high memory effectively, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, VAE is efficient for datasets expecting short training times, and its applicability to large datasets is beneficial for scalability. Its strengths in the education domain further make it a fitting choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized image datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns perfectly with the dataset tags provided. It is designed for image data and supports high dimensionality, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Moreover, it capitalizes on GPU usage and requires high memory, fitting the additional requirements. Although not specifically developed for real-time data or imbalanced datasets, VAE's strengths in short training time, compatibility with large datasets, and educational domain applicability make it the most suitable choice among the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset as it is strong in handling images, high dimensionality, and education domain datasets. It efficiently leverages GPU and supports high memory requirements, making it apt for high-computation tasks. Additionally, VAE has a short training time and scalability to large datasets, aligning well with the data size and additional requirements provided. Its weaknesses in categorical data and imbalanced data do not significantly affect the dataset characteristics, enhancing its suitability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model based on the dataset properties. It excels with image data, handles high dimensionality well, is specifically beneficial for the education domain, and works efficiently with GPUs and high memory environments. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the 'medium' data size and other dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is highly suitable as it aligns well with the dataset properties. It is strong in handling images and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Moreover, VAE is optimized for GPU usage and benefits from high memory, which are specified additional requirements. Furthermore, it performs well in educational domains and is suitable for large datasets, matching the medium data size of the dataset. While it has some weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these are not relevant concerns given the current dataset properties." + } + ], + "arrhythmia": [ + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also suitable for the medical domain and operates effectively even with imbalanced data, an essential consideration here. While it is more efficient with GPU, it can still manage with CPU constraints given its strengths. The model also provides short training time, making it viable for medium-sized datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it handles high dimensionality, medical domain, and tabular data effectively. It also scales well to large datasets without significant training time implications, which suits the medium-sized dataset. The presence of high dimensionality is particularly well managed by AE1SVM. Other models like VAE and AutoEncoder, although strong in similar areas, have weaknesses that disqualify them for CPU usage, which is a key requirement here." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for medium-sized, high dimensional tabular data in the medical domain, which aligns with the dataset tags. It supports high dimensionality, is efficient in training time, and is scalable to large datasets. Although the dataset requires CPU support, the focus is more on handling high dimensionality in tabular data, making AutoEncoder the most fitting choice with its ability to manage noisy data and its applicability in healthcare." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the best choice for this dataset because it aligns well with the dataset properties: it is capable of handling high dimensionality and tabular data, both of which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, AE1SVM is effective in the medical domain. While it does perform better with a GPU, it can still perform well with CPU resources if high memory is not a limiting factor, making it suitable for the given requirement. Despite some weaknesses, its strengths closely match the dataset requirements compared to other models on the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for the given dataset because it handles tabular data effectively, which aligns with the dataset tag 'tabular data'. It also performs well with high dimensionality, matching the dataset's 'high dimensionality' characteristic. While VAE is weaker on 'CPU', it excels in short training time, making it a practical choice for a medium-sized dataset in the medical domain. The medical strength of VAE and its capability with high-dimensional and noisy data make it a suitable option compared to other models within the provided list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is highly suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality and aligns well with the medical domain. It supports high dimensional datasets and is efficient in handling noisy data, which is beneficial given the dataset's characteristics. Although it prefers GPU, its other strengths in handling tabular data and fast training times make it a practical choice, especially considering the medium-sized dataset. Other models have limitations with tabular data or CPU usage that make them less suitable for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The AE1SVM model is chosen because it handles high-dimensional tabular data effectively, as well as medical and imbalanced data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It also supports scalability to large datasets and requires a relatively short training time, which compensates for the CPU requirement stated in the dataset tags. While AE1SVM has weaknesses such as CPU utilization, it still aligns more closely with the dataset needs compared to the other models provided, which either prefer GPU or have limited applicability to tabular medical data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The AE1SVM model is well-suited for the given dataset, which is characterized by medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data in the medical domain, and needs to run on a CPU. AE1SVM supports high dimensionality and performs well on tabular and medical data. Although its strengths mention GPU usage, it also indicates short training time and scalable solutions, making it possibly adaptable to CPU scenarios. It handles imbalanced and sparse data efficiently, which aligns with common challenges in medical datasets. Despite its weakness on noisy data, its compatibility with tabular data and medical domain make it more appropriate than other options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is a suitable choice given the dataset characteristics. It is well-suited for tabular data and high-dimensional datasets, which matches the dataset's properties. The model also handles medical domain data effectively and supports scalability to medium-sized datasets. While AE1SVM is not strong with CPU, its strengths, including short training time and capability to work with tabular data, high dimensionality, and medical domain data, align well with the dataset requirements, making it the best-fit model from the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics: it handles tabular data and is noted for performing well on high dimensional data, which is a key aspect of the dataset. It\u2019s also suitable for medium data sizes and medical domains. While AE1SVM leverages GPU, which isn't fully compatible with the CPU requirement, it does support short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it advantageous for efficient processing and scalability of the high-dimensional medical data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM suits the dataset's high dimensionality and tabular data type effectively. It supports medical domains and offers scalability to medium-sized datasets, which aligns with the dataset's medium size. While it's optimized for GPU, it does have a short training time that mitigates the requirement for CPU use. Its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data make it an appropriate choice for this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is suitable for this dataset because it handles tabular data effectively, supports high dimensionality, and is applicable in the medical domain, aligning well with the dataset characteristics. Despite its weakness on CPU usage, its strengths in handling medium-sized, high-dimensional datasets with short training times make it the best choice among the models available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the best choice for this dataset because it supports high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. It is also suitable for medical data, which aligns with the domain specified. Despite its weaknesses with CPU usage, it offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it a viable option for medium-sized datasets. Additionally, it is designed for applications requiring high dimensionality and tabular data processing, making it the most appropriate model from the list provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, medical, and characterized by high dimensionality. AE1SVM is well-suited for high dimensionality, tabular data, and medical domains. It also works well with CPU, which matches the additional requirement of the dataset. Although it is more efficient with GPUs, it still can leverage high memory and deliver short training times. Other considerations, such as scalability and the ability to handle medium-sized datasets, make AE1SVM the most balanced choice given these constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data in the medical domain, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It handles high dimensionality effectively and is known for short training times. It is scalable to large datasets, which is beneficial given the medium data size. Although it prefers GPU, it can still operate on a CPU for medium-sized data. Its weaknesses, like imbalanced data handling, are less relevant for the given dataset description." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is best suited for the given dataset properties because it supports tabular data and has strengths in handling high-dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It is also a strong choice for medical data, a feature of the domain. Although it typically uses GPU, its scalability and short training time enable efficient usage even with CPU constraints. While some weaknesses like CPU limitation exist, the alignment with dataset characteristics makes it the best choice from the provided options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it effectively handles high dimensionality and is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. The model is ideal for medical data, which aligns with the dataset's domain requirement. Although it is better suited for GPU, it can manage short training times and handle large datasets efficiently. Given the requirement for a CPU and the constraints of the other models (such as AnoGAN's weakness for tabular data and VAE's weakness for CPU usage), AE1SVM is the most appropriate choice from the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset because it supports tabular data in the medical domain and is adept at handling high dimensionality. It has strengths in scenarios requiring high dimensionality and tabular data, aligning well with the dataset properties. Additionally, it is adequate for high dimensionality, which is pivotal for this dataset characteristic. Although its strengths usually involve GPU utilization, its capacity to manage high-dimensional data and support for tabular data make it a strong candidate even for CPU-based processing." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and requirements. It excels in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, AE1SVM performs well in the medical domain and supports CPU usage, meeting the dataset's additional requirement. While it may have long training times on CPU, its ability to handle medium-sized datasets with high dimensionalities in the medical field makes it a strong candidate. Compared to other models, its pertinent strengths align well with the dataset needs, and its weaknesses do not significantly impact the dataset's defined characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset as it effectively handles tabular data with high dimensionality and is designed for medical domains, which align with the dataset properties. Additionally, it supports CPUs, which matches the computing requirements, and offers short training time and scalability to large datasets. While AE1SVM is weak on CPUs, it outperforms other models in strengths relevant to this dataset's characteristics without conflicting weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized and tabular with high dimensionality, and the requirement is to run on CPU. AE1SVM excels with tabular data and high dimensionality. Although it is stronger with GPU, it can still handle high dimensionality efficiently. While CPU and low memory are marked as weaknesses for AE1SVM, the model's capabilities in handling tabular medical datasets with high dimensionality make it the best choice among the available models, despite the trade-off with the CPU preference." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular medical data with a CPU requirement. AE1SVM excels in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which fits well with the dataset properties. Although AE1SVM prefers GPU for high memory capacity, it compensates with short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it a suitable choice given the dataset characteristics and the requirement to utilize CPU given other models' constraints with CPU or training time." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The dataset properties include medium data size, tabular data, and high dimensionality in the medical domain, with a requirement for CPU-based processing. AE1SVM is well-suited for high-dimensional and tabular data in medical applications. While it does prefer GPU for optimal performance, it can still function effectively with CPU. Its strengths align well with the dataset's high dimensionality and tabular nature, making it the most suitable choice from the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice because it handles high-dimensional tabular data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset tags of 'medium' data size and 'high dimensionality'. AE1SVM's strengths also include support for 'medical' domain data, and while it is optimized for GPU usage, it offers short training times and large dataset scalability, making it a promising fit for the 'CPU' requirement, given that it can capitalize on existing CPU resources efficiently, despite its GPU preference. Additionally, its ability to manage imbalanced and sparse data is advantageous if the dataset contains such characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also suitable for the medical domain. While the dataset requires CPU processing, AE1SVM generally copes well with medium-sized datasets, and its short training time is beneficial. Despite its CPU weakness, its compatibility with the dataset's properties and requirements outweighs this drawback compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it supports high dimensionality, tabular data, and medical domain data which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it is capable of medium data sizes and can handle high memory, short training time, and scalability, making it well paired with a CPU environment even though it's optimized for GPU. Its weaknesses such as small data sizes and long training time on CPU are not major limitations given the dataset's medium size and additional CPU requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is a suitable choice because it supports high dimensionality, works well with tabular data, and is applicable in the medical domain, all of which align with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, although it mentions GPU compatibility, it doesn't have CPU listed as a weakness, making it viable for CPU-based deployment. Its ability to handle large datasets with high dimensionality makes it a strong candidate for this task, given the dataset is of medium size and high dimensionality." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset characterized by medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data in the medical domain with CPU availability. It is specifically strong in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. AE1SVM also excels in the medical domain. Although it prefers GPU, it is capable of leveraging high memory and providing short training times, which can help mitigate its CPU limitation. Other models have weaknesses such as long training times, a preference for GPU, or worse compatibility with tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the best choice because it is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It has strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, sparse data, and medical domains, which are key aspects of this dataset. Although it does use high memory and has a weakness for CPU usage, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it a good fit given the dataset size and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it supports high dimensionality and tabular data, and is specifically noted for applications in the medical domain, which fits the dataset characteristics. Despite being listed as requiring a GPU and having a weakness on CPU, its suitability on tabular data, capability to handle high dimensionality, and applicability to medical data make it the best match among the given options. Additionally, it has a short training time and can handle imbalanced data, relevant qualities for this project." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is chosen because it effectively handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which are core characteristics of the dataset. It is also suited for medical data, which aligns with the dataset's domain. Although it has CPU as a weakness, AE1SVM\u2019s strengths in high dimensional data and tabular data usage outweigh this specific requirement, making it the most aligned with the dataset's properties compared to other models on the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It handles tabular data with high dimensionality and is explicitly marked for use in the medical domain. Furthermore, it can operate well with imbalanced and sparse data, which are common in medical datasets. Despite having a preference for GPU, it is the best compromise given the requirement to use a CPU, as other models with better CPU compatibility either do not support high dimensionality well or lack medical domain suitability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder excels in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and is suitable for the medical domain, aligning well with the dataset properties. It also supports scalable analysis with its GPU capability and short training time, which is advantageous given the medium data size and high dimensionality. Despite the additional requirement for CPU, AutoEncoder's strengths in the relevant data type and characteristics make it a more suitable option over other models whose weaknesses align more significantly with the dataset characteristics, such as CPU-dependency or poor performance on tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset tags because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It supports medical domain data, which is specifically required here. Although it traditionally leverages GPU, it can be adapted for CPU use without major drawbacks. Additionally, it offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, fitting the medium-sized data requirement. Other models may not support the CPU as well or lack comprehensive alignment with both data type and domain needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for medium-sized, high-dimensional, tabular medical data, which are the characteristics of the dataset in question. It supports tabular data and works well under high-dimensional conditions, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. While it requires a GPU and typically high memory for better performance, AE1SVM is capable of short training times and is scalable to large datasets, ensuring efficient processing within the resources on a CPU is the additional requirement here. Despite the CPU requirement being less optimal for AE1SVM, its strengths in handling high dimensional tabular data in the medical domain make it the most suitable choice compared to other options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for the dataset properties as it supports tabular data, high dimensionality, and the medical domain. Although it prefers a GPU, its weaknesses regarding CPU are less critical compared to alternatives. Additionally, AE1SVM is robust to high-dimensional data and has a short training time, making it a better fit for a medium-sized dataset with high dimensionality constraints, unlike other models that have significant weaknesses with tabular data or CPU usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling high-dimensional tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is designed for medical domains and performs well with medium-sized datasets. Although it usually operates with a GPU, CPU can suffice if memory is managed appropriately. AE1SVM's strengths in tabular and medical data, combined with its ability to handle high dimensionality, make it the best choice given the dataset properties and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling high-dimensional and tabular data, which align with the dataset properties. It is also well-suited for medium-sized datasets typically found in the medical domain. Additionally, it supports CPU usage, which is a requirement. Although it has weaknesses with CPU performance, it is comparatively more suitable than others given the dataset properties and model characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which are key properties of the dataset. It is designed for medical applications, aligning with the domain requirement. Additionally, it offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which fits the medium data size requirement. Although CPU is listed as a weakness, AE1SVM's strengths closely match the dataset characteristics better than other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset characteristics and requirements. It offers strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, both of which are traits of the dataset in question. Additionally, AE1SVM is applicable to medical domains and can efficiently operate with a short training time, despite its weakness with CPU-based implementations. Other models either lack one or more of these critical strengths or have limitations that make them less suitable for the given requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model considering the dataset properties and requirements. It is effective with tabular, high-dimensional data commonly found in medical domains, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. It offers strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data and is scalable to medium-sized datasets. Though it prefers GPU over CPU, its strengths outweigh others that either focus mainly on image data or require longer training times on CPU. AutoEncoder's suitability for healthcare and its efficient training time make it the best fit for these requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It handles high-dimensional tabular data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. AE1SVM also handles medical data proficiently and performs well with medium-sized datasets. While it requires GPU and has high memory needs, these are not listed as constraints. Its features of short training time and scalability to large datasets further make it preferable." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is designed for medical domain applications, offers scalability to large datasets, and has a short training time, making it efficient on CPU despite its preference for GPU. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, its strengths overlap significantly with the dataset requirements, making it the most suitable choice among the options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it is designed to handle tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, the AutoEncoder is known for its strengths in healthcare and can efficiently manage noisy data while providing a scalable solution for medium-sized datasets. Although the CPU requirement is a weakness, the balance of other strengths makes it a better fit compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model highly aligns with the dataset's characteristics and requirements. It supports tabular data, which is the data type of the dataset. It also handles high dimensionality well, a key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, the model performs efficiently with medium data sizes and provides scalability to larger datasets, making it suitable for the given dataset size. Although it requires a GPU for optimal performance, it excels in healthcare and medical domains and can handle noisy data, making it a suitable choice despite the additional CPU requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for the dataset as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, aligning with the medical domain. It also supports CPUs, which matches the requirement, despite its general preference for GPUs. Though it has longer training times, its strengths in tabular data and medical applications make it the best fit among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is a suitable choice as it supports tabular data and is effective for datasets with high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. Although it requires a GPU for optimal performance, it is mentioned as scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the medium-sized dataset requirement. Additionally, it is robust with noisy data, which is beneficial in the medical domain, even though the preference for CPU could be a limitation, the AutoEncoder's strengths outweigh this consideration." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is a suitable model for the given dataset as it handles tabular data effectively and is proficient in managing high dimensionality, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also aligns well with medical domain requirements and supports GPU, which is a preferable condition since CPU is not a strength. While AE1SVM does have a weakness regarding CPU, this is outweighed by the strengths it offers for handling the task at hand. It also boasts short training times and scales well to large datasets, ensuring performance is maintained across the medium-sized dataset provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is also adept in medical domains and offers short training time, making it a good fit for CPU-based requirements. Despite its weakness on CPU usage, its capabilities in handling high-dimensional medical tabular data outweigh this limitation, making it the most suitable choice among the given models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality, aligns well with the medical domain, and performs efficiently in terms of both training time and scalability to large datasets. Despite requiring a GPU for optimal performance, its compatibility with tabular data and the medical domain makes it a suitable choice from the provided options given the dataset's characteristics and CPU requirements are secondary to dimensionality and domain match." + } + ], + "pendigits": [ + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it can handle large datasets and is scalable to large datasets, which suits the 'large' data size tag. Despite not being specifically labeled for 'time series', its emphasis on high dimensionality and scalability could offer a flexible approach to handling time series data. Although it shows weaknesses with 'low memory', there isn't another model better suited that sufficiently matches the strengths needed alongside CPU compatibility. Its handling of high dimensionality aligns well with the needs typically associated with time series data, even if the signal is low." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it supports large datasets and is scalable, which aligns with the dataset's 'large' size property. While it is generally strong in handling sparse and imbalanced data with GPU support, its compatibility with time-series data is limited. However, compared to other models, it has the advantage of being capable of handling large datasets with relatively low computational resources, and it offers short training times. Its weaknesses in hyperparameter sensitivity can be managed, and the computational intensity can be mitigated by its short training time and scalability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for large datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties of a large time series dataset. While it has weaknesses related to CPU and low memory use, there are no models perfectly matching these needs specifically for time series and low-signal data. AE1SVM is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it a better compromise than the other models, which have more critical weaknesses for this dataset type." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected as it supports large datasets and is scalable. It can handle high dimensionality and noisy data, which are pertinent to the dataset characteristics. Although it requires GPU and high memory, it can adapt to CPU with optimizations. While it does have a weakness in low-signal data, this is outweighed by the strengths applicable to large time series datasets. None of the other models fully address the requirements and constraints presented as effectively as AutoEncoder does." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "Although time series data and low-signal data are noted weaknesses for LUNAR, it matches the constraints of requiring low memory usage and CPU compatibility better than other options. Additionally, it is suitable for large datasets and has short training time which is important for scalability and computational efficiency on CPU. Given the limitations of other models with CPU, low memory, and low-signal capabilities, LUNAR is the best fit from the available options, despite its weaknesses in handling time series data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "The dataset is a large time series with low-signal data, requiring low memory and CPU efficiency. SO-GAAL, although not specifically strong in time series data, has short training times and requires low memory, which is crucial given the dataset's properties. Compared to other models in the list, most have weaknesses that conflict significantly with either CPU requirements or low memory usage, or both." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "Given the dataset properties, specifically the large data size and low memory requirements, VAE is selected because it can handle large datasets with relatively short training times, even though it generally requires high memory which may be managed with data batching. While VAE isn't perfect for low-memory environments, it is the best compromise available in terms of scalability and efficiency compared to other models. It is most efficient on GPUs but has capacity to work across large-scale time series datasets, which aligns more than others with the given dataset properties and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice given the dataset's properties. It supports scalable processing of large datasets and operates efficiently with CPU resources, which aligns with the requirement of low memory usage. Despite its weakness in handling time series data, it compensates with strengths in handling large datasets and a short training time. Additionally, LUNAR can manage low-signal data to a better extent compared to other models in the list, offering a balance between strengths and weaknesses suitable for the dataset characteristics presented." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "The Deep SVDD model is selected due to its scalability to large datasets and capability to handle high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics of being large. It also operates well with GPU, which is beneficial given the CPU and low memory constraints, helping manage resources efficiently. While it doesn't explicitly mention strengths in time series data, its general scalability and handling of complex data types like images and technology data suggest it could be adaptable. However, note it might require tuning due to its high dimensional focus." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it supports high dimensionality, sparse data, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties of handling a large time series dataset. Despite its low-memory weakness, it has strengths in high-dimensional data and short training time, which can be beneficial for managing the challenges of low-signal data. Although it's not explicitly designed for time series data, it is better suited for CPU and low memory requirements than other options in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Considering the dataset is large, is a time series, and is low-signal with a requirement for CPU and low memory usage, Deep SVDD is the most suitable option. It is scalable to large datasets, making it apt for a large data size, and while it is not explicitly strong for time series, it doesn't have specific weaknesses in this area compared to other models. Additionally, many models have weaknesses related to CPU preference or consume high memory, while Deep SVDD offers a more balanced choice without these particular drawbacks." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is chosen because it's scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset's large size. While it does not specifically excel in time series, its strengths in high dimensionality might help in handling complex patterns within low-signal data. Although it typically uses a GPU, it avoids some critical weaknesses present in other models, like poor scalability or incompatible with low memory. Additionally, it does not explicitly list CPU as a limitation, allowing some flexibility if GPU usage can be managed. None of the other models are well-suited for handling time series and low-signal data combined with CPU/low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties of being a large, time series data with low-signal and CPU and low memory constraints. While VAE's strengths don't explicitly mention time series, it is capable of handling high dimensionality which can be beneficial for time series analysis. It supports large datasets and has a short training time, aligning with CPU and low memory requirements. Although it has weaknesses with low-signal data, the absence of a perfect fit among the available models makes VAE the most balanced option with regard to the dataset constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is selected because it has the capability to handle large datasets with short training time, which is essential given the dataset's 'large' size. While SO-GAAL has a weakness with 'time series', it is less problematic compared to other models that either have 'low memory' as a weakness or do not handle CPU well. Other models with suitable capabilities for large datasets (such as AutoEncoder, AE1SVM, and ALAD) also have critical weaknesses like low memory, low-signal data, or CPU inefficiency. SO-GAAL strikes a balance by supporting CPU and requiring low memory, making it a more feasible choice given resource constraints, even with its limitation in handling time series data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, contains time series data, is low-signal, and requires a model with low memory usage and compatibility with CPU. While AutoEncoder is not known for CPU compatibility, it excels in processing large datasets and handling noisy data efficiently, which compensates for low-signal data. Despite its disadvantage in CPU compatibility, it remains a better choice than other models given that alternatives like AnoGAN, DevNet, and ALAD explicitly have time series as a weakness, and others possess greater weaknesses in handling low-signal and CPU requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE has strengths such as handling large datasets, high dimensionality, scalability to large datasets, and short training time, which align well with the dataset's large size and characteristics. Although it has weaknesses in low-signal data and CPU requirements, it is the best fit among the given options, as other models such as DevNet, SO-GAAL, and ALAD have critical weaknesses in time series and low-signal data, making them unsuitable." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it can handle large datasets, which is crucial given the data size tag. Although it generally favors GPU scenarios, its scalability makes it a good fit for handling large datasets even on a CPU when memory is a constraint. Additionally, while it has weaknesses related to noisy data, it does not have critical weaknesses against time series data or low-signal data, unlike many other models in the list. This makes it a better fit relative to others given the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, aligning with the dataset tag 'large'. The model has CPU compatibility, which is essential given the 'CPU' and 'low memory' additional requirements. Although it shows weaknesses in time series data, the competing models also face significant challenges with either low memory or time series data. LUNAR's short training time and ability to handle large datasets make it a practical choice considering the constraints and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is selected because it is capable of handling large datasets and benefits from GPU acceleration, which suits time series data with large size requirements. Although it has a weakness in dealing with noisy data, the dataset is characterized by low-signal data, which may not be as detrimental as noise. Additionally, among the models available, Deep SVDD is more aligned with handling high-dimensional data structures typical in such problems while still being scalable for large datasets, even under CPU constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it is scalable to large datasets, which matches the 'large' data size tag. Despite it being generally more suited for GPU rather than CPU, its ability to handle high dimensionality and noisy data aligns well with the 'time series' and 'low-signal data' characteristics of the dataset. The primary weakness of the AutoEncoder is its performance on 'low-signal data' and 'CPU' setting, but given the need to select one model from the list, it aligns better overall compared to other models with more pronounced weaknesses regarding time series data or low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected as it is scalable to large datasets, which fits the 'large' data size requirement. Although it has weaknesses with low-signal data, like many other models on the list, it possesses short training time and can handle high dimensionality which may help in extracting useful features from the time series data. Additionally, it can manage noisy data which might help in dealing with the low-signal characteristic of the dataset. Even though AutoEncoder's weaknesses include 'CPU' usage and 'low-signal data', it surfaces as a reasonable choice given the limited matching strength options from the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AnoGAN", + "reason": "The dataset is tagged as large and time series with low-signal data, requiring CPU and low memory consumption. While AnoGAN has weaknesses in low memory, it fits the requirement of handling large datasets, making it a scalable option. Other models either lack specific support for time series data or have significant weaknesses in handling low memory or CPU-based requirements. Despite its low memory weakness, AnoGAN's scalability to large datasets aligns well with the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is suitable for large time series datasets and can scale to large datasets while utilizing GPU, which aligns well with the dataset requirements. Although it has weaknesses regarding noisy data, it does not explicitly mention low memory or low-signal data as issues. Other models have more pronounced conflicts with the dataset's characteristics, such as low memory or explicit weaknesses with time series data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is chosen because it is scalable to large datasets and leverages powerful GPUs to manage computational demands, fitting the dataset's large size and low memory constraint when using CPUs. Although it has weaknesses with noisy and imbalanced data, these are not significant concerns given the data's low-signal characteristic. While not explicitly designed for low-signal time series data, Deep SVDD offers manageable trade-offs compared to other models on these aspects." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it is capable of handling large datasets and is scalable across them, which matches the dataset's large size. Although it's not a strength for CPU or low memory environments, it is the most balanced model considering that other models have significant weaknesses for low-signal data or time series, which this dataset requires handling. Despite its weakness with low-signal data, its general suitability for large datasets without the need for real-time data processing makes it the best potential fit from the list available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for high dimensionality and scalable datasets, which aligns with the large size of the time series data. While time series itself is not a strength, compared to other models in the list, AE1SVM's capabilities in handling high dimensionality and large data make it a more practical choice. Its weakness of CPU preference aligns with the dataset's requirement for low memory usage better than other models considering memory constraints. Additionally, given that low-signal data is not a specific weakness listed for AE1SVM, it makes a stronger case than models with explicit weaknesses for time series or low-signal contexts." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "The dataset is large and time series based, with low-signal data and a requirement for CPU and low memory usage. Deep SVDD is scalable to large datasets and doesn't have explicit weaknesses related to CPU usage or low memory, making it a more viable option among the choices provided. Though it is not specifically strong in handling time series or low-signal data, it avoids severe memory or CPU constraints compared to other models in the list, aligning relatively better with the dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable as it can handle large datasets and has low memory requirements, which aligns with the dataset's tag for 'CPU' and 'low memory'. Although it has a weakness for time series data, its overall scalability, short training time, and ability to handle sparse and imbalanced data make it a reasonable choice given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large with time series data and requires a model suitable for low-signal data and low memory usage on a CPU. Among the given models, the AutoEncoder has strengths in handling large datasets, high dimensionality, and has short training time which aligns well with the large data size. Although it is noted for GPU and high memory usage typically, it does not have explicitly stated weaknesses for time series data, unlike most other models listed, making it the best available option considering the constraints and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected due to its capability to handle large datasets and its efficiency with high dimensionality data, which is crucial for the given large time series dataset. Although it has weaknesses in handling low-signal data and CPU-based operations, it provides a scalable solution with short training time and noise handling, which offsets the low-signal limitation. Despite its high memory usage, it aligns better with the dataset requirements compared to the other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is selected because it aligns well with several key requirements for this dataset. It operates effectively on large datasets and is scalable, meeting the 'large' data size criterion. While SO-GAAL is not specifically strong in time series, it does handle imbalanced and high dimensionality datasets, which might be encountered in the 'low-signal data' characteristic. It also has a short training time, which is beneficial for CPU and low memory environments. Despite some weaknesses, such as being limited for time series data, it is the best fit compared to other models that have even more pronounced disadvantages under these constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is chosen because it is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset's large size requirement. While it is not specifically designed for time series data, it does not have significant weaknesses in handling time series, unlike most other models. Although Deep SVDD can require high memory, it is manageable as memory is not the primary constraint compared to scalability. Its ability to handle high dimensionality and suitability for GPU also align well with large dataset processing, making it a feasible choice given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large and requires low memory use on CPU with a time series data type and low-signal characteristics. While AutoEncoder has a weakness related to low-signal data as well as CPU use, it is capable of handling large datasets and short training time. Among the available options, AutoEncoder is the most suitable since it can process large datasets efficiently, even though it typically requires GPU. Other models have more direct weaknesses regarding time series or low-signal data, making them less viable choices." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is a large time series with low-signal data, which means it requires a model that can handle such characteristics while operating with low memory and CPU. Most models listed are not designed for time series or are not optimized for low-signal data. LUNAR, despite its weaknesses in time series, is the only model that mentions scalability to large datasets on GPU and short training time, fitting the constraint on processing large datasets. It can potentially handle low-signal data better compared to other models with more severe time series weaknesses, such as DevNet and ALAD." + }, + { + "selected_model": "DevNet", + "reason": "Despite its weaknesses with time series and low-signal data, DevNet is chosen due to its strengths in handling large datasets, short training time, and scalability. The focus on CPU and low memory requirements highlights the model's ability to be optimized without requiring GPU, which suits the constraints of the dataset. Although not the ideal fit for time series, no model in the list perfectly matches the dataset characteristics, and DevNet's scalable nature and short training time make it a reasonable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "The dataset is large and consists of time series data with low signal, requiring a model that can manage scalability and handle low-signal data. Given the options, Deep SVDD is scalable to large datasets, which addresses the data size. While it does not explicitly support time series, it is better suited compared to others that have notable weaknesses with time series and CPU requirements. Deep SVDD's scalability, despite its sensitivity to noisy data, makes it the most suitable available model from the list for processing large datasets effectively within given constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "The Deep SVDD model is selected because it is scalable to large datasets, which fits the large data size tag. Although it requires a GPU, it handles high dimensionality effectively, making it suitable for other time series tasks even though it doesn't explicitly mention time series as a strength. It also bypasses the 'low memory' weakness prevalent in other models. Despite its challenges with noisy data, it fits all other expectations better than other models, given its scalable nature and focus on large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is a suitable choice considering the dataset's large size and time series nature. While it doesn't explicitly have time series as a strength, it possesses scalability to large datasets. Other models have weaknesses in time series or low-signal data, whereas Deep SVDD does not explicitly cite these as weaknesses. It also fits the CPU requirement better than other GPU-intensive models, making it a balanced choice given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it is scalable to large datasets, which matches the 'large' data size requirement. Although it requires high memory, it has a short training time which offsets some of its memory demands, and low memory efficiency is a common issue among many models provided. Its ability to handle high dimensionality and large datasets makes it suitable for the time series data type. Despite the CPU requirement, VAE offers a better balance for the dataset's needs compared to other models, since autoencoders generally perform well with time series. While it is weak with low-signal data, it offers versatility that the alternatives do not, given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is chosen for its strengths in handling large datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. It also has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Although it has a weakness in dealing with low-signal data, the other available models have more significant weaknesses such as lacking support for time series datasets and requiring high memory or GPU, which contradicts the dataset's additional requirements for CPU and low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is chosen because it can handle large datasets and works well with time series, despite not being explicitly focused on it. It efficiently handles high-dimensional data with its scalability and short training time on large datasets. Although AutoEncoder is weaker with low-signal data, the need for CPU and low memory are constraints, its strengths in handling noisy and high-dimensional data make it more suitable compared to other options in the list. Most of the other models have significant weaknesses concerning time series data. AutoEncoder also has scalability, a short training time, and the capability to run on a GPU, making it practical for large time series datasets under typical computational limitations." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's large size. Although it typically requires a GPU and high memory, it can handle low memory constraints to some extent and has short training times which reduce memory consumption. Despite its weakness in CPU operations, it best fits the constraints given compared to other models which have more critical weaknesses for time series and low signal data attributes." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "The dataset under consideration is large and time series based with characteristics indicating low signal data, and there is a requirement for a model that can efficiently run on CPU with low memory usage. While none of the models completely align with all dataset requirements, Deep SVDD is known for handling high-dimensional data types and scales efficiently with large datasets. Despite its weak point with low signal data, its strengths in scalable dataset management align with the requirement for low computational overhead on larger datasets better than other options in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is scalable to large datasets and operates efficiently with short training times, which is crucial given the dataset's large size and CPU requirement. Even though LUNAR has weaknesses concerning time series data, the other models have more significant drawbacks for this specific dataset. LUNAR does not suffer from low memory issues and can handle imbalanced and sparse data, which may be beneficial for low-signal characteristics. Other models, such as VAE and AutoEncoder, primarily operate with GPUs and potentially high memory, which does not align well with the low memory and CPU requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "Given the dataset's large size, time series nature, and additional requirements for CPU and low memory, the selection was challenging due to the constraints and weaknesses in the models provided. However, LUNAR has strengths in handling large datasets, despite its weakness in time series data. It is scalable, has a short training time, and operates well within the GPU paradigm. While not optimal in handling time series directly, it was chosen for its scalability and low computational requirements, fitting the need for large dataset handling within low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Given the dataset characteristics of a large time series dataset with low memory requirements and CPU usage, Deep SVDD is the most suitable choice. Although it explicitly states a weakness in handling noisy data and potentially high memory, its scalability to large datasets, utilization of GPU, and strengths in domains like healthcare and technology align more closely with the requirements than the other models. Other models have specific weaknesses related to low-signal data or time series, making Deep SVDD a potentially more viable option despite its limitations." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it is capable of handling large datasets and has strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite having weaknesses in low memory, the strength in scalability and short training time makes it a more suitable choice for a large time series dataset with low-signal data, considering the limitations of other models regarding weaknesses with time series or low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is chosen primarily because it is scalable to large datasets, which matches the 'large' data size requirement in the dataset tags. Although it has weaknesses with time series data (which is part of this dataset's characteristics), the model's scalability and capability of handling sparse and imbalanced data, along with short training time, make it a viable option when prioritizing CPU and low memory capabilities. Other models either have significant drawbacks with low memory or require GPU, neither of which align well with the additional requirements. LUNAR's computational efficiency and scalability make it the most balanced choice given the dataset constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is chosen because it is capable of handling high dimensionality and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags indicating a large dataset. Despite its requirement for high memory, it is the most compatible with CPU usage compared to other options like AutoEncoder or VAE that lean towards GPU and high memory use. Although it has a weakness towards noisy data, the low-signal nature of the provided dataset was a constraint across most models, making the scalability and dimensionality support of Deep SVDD the deciding factor." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is suitable for large datasets which is a key requirement, and it is scalable to large datasets. Although it requires GPU and high memory, it has a relatively short training time and can handle noisy data. Despite its weakness with CPU requirements, it remains the best match given the alternatives which either suffer from greater incompatibility with time series data or have more significant weaknesses related to low-signal data or memory constraints. While no model perfectly aligns with all dataset tags, VAE offers the most balanced trade-off." + } + ], + "shuttle": [ + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets, like the one described in the dataset tags, and it effectively handles noisy data, which is a characteristic of this dataset. While it prefers a GPU, it can still function with CPU, although not optimally. It also supports scalable processing necessary for large datasets and provides short training times, which aligns with the additional requirements for CPU and low memory usage to some extent." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets with noisy data, which matches the dataset characteristics provided. It is scalable to large datasets and has strengths in both technology domains and handling high dimensionality. While it typically requires GPU and high memory, it effectively addresses the noisy data aspect of the dataset and does not have significant weaknesses related to tabular data or large datasets. Other models either have weaknesses with tabular data or do not handle noisy data well, making AutoEncoder the most balanced choice given the requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is highly suitable for this dataset as it handles tabular data well, is known for managing noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets. While it does typically leverage a GPU, it aligns well with the requirements for high dimensional and noisy data analysis in the technology domain. Despite the CPU and low memory preference, its strengths in managing large, noisy tabular datasets make it the best fit from the available choices." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset involves large, tabular, noisy data in the technology domain, having constraints of CPU usage and low memory. Among the available models, AutoEncoder effectively handles large datasets, tabular data, and noisy data with short training time and scalability, which aligns well with the dataset properties. While it typically requires high memory and GPU, its strengths in managing large, noisy tabular data under technology are more aligned with the dataset's characteristics than other models. Other models either do not support tabular data adequately or have shortcomings in handling noisy data or are not suitable for low memory/cpu constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is best suited for this dataset because it handles tabular technology data well, is robust to noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets. Although it has high memory requirements, the dataset's additional requirement for low memory is a limiting factor for many potential models, but AutoEncoder's ability to run on GPUs and its short training time help mitigate these issues compared to other models with longer training times or resource constraints. Furthermore, while it typically uses GPUs, its other strengths align well with the dataset's characteristics, making it a practical choice given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is a suitable choice due to its strengths in handling large, tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Despite its typical preference for GPUs over CPUs, it is scalable to large datasets, which is beneficial given the large data size. Although it generally requires high memory, the capability for efficient memory usage through proper data preprocessing and model optimization could potentially mitigate this weakness. Other models like VAE and ALAD have notable strengths, but AutoEncoder's specific strengths in tabular data, noise handling, and scalability make it a more balanced choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is a suitable choice for handling large, noisy tabular data in the technology domain. It is capable of working well with high dimensional data and is efficient with noisy datasets. Although it is mentioned that AutoEncoder typically requires high memory and a GPU for optimal performance, its ability to efficiently process large datasets and handle noisy data aligns with the dataset properties. Additionally, it has a short training time which further supports its feasibility given the CPU and low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for large-scale, tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics provided. It can handle high dimensionality and is scalable to large datasets, which is essential given the large data size. Additionally, AutoEncoder supports noisy data and has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory constraint. Although it prefers GPU over CPU, its strengths in handling the presented dataset characteristics outweigh this weakness compared to other models on the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it performs well with large tabular datasets and can handle noisy data effectively, which is a crucial requirement here. It also has short training times and is scalable to large datasets, fitting well within the constraints of CPU use and low memory. Despite its weakness on CPUs, AutoEncoder remains the best fit among the available options given its strengths align well with the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for large tabular datasets with noisy data as mentioned in the dataset tags. It has strengths in handling technology domain data with high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's properties. Although it requires GPU for optimal performance, its strengths outweigh the weaknesses compared to other models in the list, especially under the constraints of low memory usage in a CPU environment." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the dataset as it handles large tabular datasets effectively and is capable of dealing with noisy data, which is a key requirement here. Its strengths in technology domain, high dimensionality, and scalability to large datasets align well with the dataset characteristics. Moreover, it features a short training time which can be beneficial given the low memory and CPU constraints. Although it requires a GPU and high memory, it still addresses the core dataset needs more comprehensively than other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset, as it supports tabular data and is capable of handling noisy data effectively. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which aligns with the requirement for a model that can handle the data size and characteristics efficiently. Although the AutoEncoder may require GPU and high memory, these are trade-offs for its strengths in dealing with large, noisy datasets in a technological domain." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it excels in handling large tabular datasets with noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. It is suited for technology domain data and is scalable to large datasets. While it generally requires high memory, it can manage the large data size and noisy characteristics effectively, addressing the dataset's needs within the constraints that prefer CPU usage. Furthermore, AutoEncoder offers a short training time, which aligns well with the requirement for handling noisy data efficiently." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is suitable for the provided dataset properties as it handles large tabular datasets effectively, works well with noisy data, and is known for its scalability to large datasets. Despite its preference for GPU, it has a short training time and does not specifically mention a requirement for high memory, making it a feasible option for a low memory setup. Furthermore, its general applicability to technology domains aligns well with the dataset's domain tag." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable for handling the requirements of large, tabular datasets with noisy data. It is designed to work well with technology domains, and it supports high dimensionality. Although its strengths are optimized for GPU, it also presents short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it compatible with the CPU and low memory characteristics needed. Despite its weakness in CPU performance, it matches most of the dataset requirements better than the other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected due to its strengths in handling tabular data and large datasets, both of which are key properties of the given dataset. Additionally, it is capable of working with noisy data and technology-related domains, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics. Though it generally requires high memory and GPUs, it offers short training times, which can be advantageous in computationally constrained environments. Its CPU-related weaknesses are noted but outweighed by its overall alignment with the dataset needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and handles noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets, has short training time, and supports GPU, making it efficient despite the no CPU requirement. While it requires high memory, this is less of a concern compared to ensuring compatibility with noisy data and large size. Other models either have more significant weaknesses with noisy data (Deep SVDD, LUNAR) or are not optimal for tabular data (AnoGAN, SO-GAAL), or require resources unsuitable given the dataset (e.g., CPU with VAE)." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is chosen because it aligns well with the dataset characteristics and requirements. It supports tabular data, technology domain, and is effective with noisy data. It can handle large datasets efficiently and has a short training time. While it typically requires high memory, it outperforms other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, SO-GAAL, and Deep SVDD which have significant weaknesses such as inability to handle tabular data, noisy data, or low memory compatibility. The AutoEncoder offers a practical balance considering the constraints, especially given that it can be computationally adjusted to work within CPU and memory limitations." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it effectively handles tabular data and scales to large datasets, both of which align with the dataset properties. Furthermore, it performs well with noisy data, a critical characteristic of the dataset. While it primarily leverages GPU, which may not fully align with the CPU requirement, it supports low memory usage and offers a short training time, providing a good balance for the given constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it is strong with tabular data, handles large datasets well, is effective in processing noisy data, and is associated with a short training time. While it typically utilizes a GPU, its capability to handle large-scale data and noisy environments makes it apt for technology sector datasets. It does not explicitly have a CPU or low memory preference, but given the constraints, its overall strengths align well with the dataset's needs, compared to other models that either lack scalability to large datasets or are less suited to noisy tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling large tabular data, especially within the technology domain. It is capable of dealing with noisy data and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset tags. Despite its requirement for high memory, it provides a short training time and aligns well with the model requirement for GPU compatibility rather than CPU. Among the models available in the list, AutoEncoder strikes the best balance between managing noisiness and scaling with large data, making it the most suitable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is most suitable considering the dataset properties and model characteristics. It is adept at handling tabular and noisy data, as well as technology domain applications, which aligns with the dataset's type and characteristics. Despite its GPU preference and sometimes high memory need, VAE is capable of handling large datasets efficiently with a short training time. The model's weakness in CPU handling is opposite of the dataset's additional requirement, but given the overall suitability to the dataset's tags, it stands out as the best choice from the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the best choice given the dataset properties. It is well-suited for large tabular datasets in the technology domain and is capable of handling noisy data effectively, a key characteristic of the dataset. Although it has a weakness with respect to CPU requirements, its strength in adapting to high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets makes it suitable for the given data size and additional requirements. Moreover, it has a short training time which aligns well with operational efficiency." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, consists of tabular data, is noisy, and requires compatibility with low memory and CPU resources. The AutoEncoder excels with large datasets, handles tabular and noisy data well, and offers short training times, making it suitable for low memory situations. Although a weakness listed is CPU usage, it still addresses more dataset requirements compared to other models in the list. Its ability to scale and handle high dimensional data is also advantageous for technology domain data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. It supports high-dimensionality data and is scalable to large datasets while offering a short training time. Despite requiring high memory and typically utilizing GPU, it can handle the given dataset requirements better than other models. The limitations concerning CPU are a common challenge, but its ability to manage noisy data is crucial given the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is suitable for handling large tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It leverages GPU for efficient processing and maintains short training times, making it feasible with low memory constraints. Despite its weakness in CPU needs, its ability to scale to large datasets and manage noisy data makes it the best fit compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is suitable as it can handle tabular data and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is scalable to large datasets and performs well with high-dimensionality, which aligns with the need for scalability and the dataset size. Although AutoEncoder typically requires high memory, the dataset's focus on CPU and low memory are not critical limitations since the strengths of handling large, noisy, tabular data outweigh these concerns, making it the best fit among available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset consists of large tabular data with noisy characteristics and requires models that can run on CPU with low memory. While AutoEncoders typically leverage GPUs and high memory, their ability to handle large datasets and noisy data makes them more suitable given the constraints. They have strengths in tabular data and technology domains, aligning well with the dataset properties, and offer short training times, which is advantageous in CPU environments." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the best choice for this large tabular dataset in the technology domain with noisy data, as it is scalable to large datasets and has strengths in handling noisy data and tabular formats. While it has a high memory usage and GPU preference, it offers a short training time which is advantageous given the CPU and low memory additional requirements. Other models either do not handle tabular data well, are not suitable for noisy data, or have extended weaknesses like long training times that may not align with low memory availability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is most suitable for the dataset properties as it supports tabular data and is capable of handling noisy data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It also performs well with large datasets and is scalable. While it may require GPU and high memory, it fulfills the requirement for large data size management. Among all the models in the list, the AutoEncoder aligns the best considering both its strengths and the dataset's needs, even if the 'low memory' requirement is not perfectly aligned, it is a reasonable trade-off given other strengths." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and handles large datasets effectively, both of which align with the dataset properties. It is capable of working with noisy data, a key characteristic of the dataset. While VAE typically benefits from GPU acceleration, it is also scalable to large datasets, which is necessary given the dataset's size. Despite its weakness in CPU usage, it aligns better than other models with most dataset requirements, such as handling noisy data and large-scale tabular data in the technology domain." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is best suited for this scenario due to its strengths in handling large, noisy tabular datasets, which matches the dataset tags provided. It is also scalable to large datasets, and despite its general preference for GPUs, its capability with CPU and short training times make it a suitable choice. Other models like VAE and ALAD also have strengths in these areas, but the AutoEncoder is less compromised by low memory and CPU constraints compared to others." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets with noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. While other models like VAE also fit these criteria, the AutoEncoder does not have 'CPU' as a weakness, making it more suitable given the requirement for low memory usage. Additionally, it supports scalability to large datasets and has short training times, which are important considerations for the given dataset constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it supports tabular data and efficiently handles noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which is suitable given the data size. Despite the CPU and low memory requirements as weaknesses, its strengths make it a suitable choice for large tabular datasets with noise in the technology domain." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for handling large tabular datasets in the technology domain with inherent noisy data characteristics. It is optimized for large datasets and achieves a short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory requirement constraint. Although it tends to leverage GPU for better performance, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data make it the most appropriate choice for this particular dataset among the given options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets in the technology domain, particularly when dealing with noisy data. It is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time. While it has a weakness related to CPU usage and low memory, it is arguably the most compatible choice among the options, as other models have more significant weaknesses concerning the specific dataset requirements such as handling tabular data or noisy data effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice because it is specifically strong with tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's tag for data type. It is capable of handling noisy data, which is another key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets which is essential given the data size. While the model uses high memory and GPU, it offers a short training time, which is beneficial despite the CPU and low memory requirements. Considering the trade-offs and the need to process large, noisy tabular datasets effectively, AutoEncoder balances scalability with performance better than other models in the context provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large-sized, tabular, technology-related, and noisy, with a requirement for low memory and CPU utilization. Among the models, 'AutoEncoder' handles tabular data, technology, and noisy data well. While it requires high memory and prefers GPU, it can have a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which are critical requirements given the dataset's properties. Although CPU adaptability is a weakness, other model options either do not support tabular data well or have significant weaknesses with large datasets or noisy data, making 'AutoEncoder' the best compromise for the given constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable as it supports both tabular and technology domains, handles noisy data well, and is scalable to large datasets. Although it generally requires high memory, it has a short training time and can work with GPU, making it a good fit given the dataset size and characteristics. While it prefers GPU, it can be efficient on CPU with careful management of hyperparameters. Moreover, VAE specifically mentions compatibility with tabular data which matches the dataset's data type." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is tabular, large in size, and contains noisy data with a requirement for low memory and CPU usage. AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data handling and can manage noisy data effectively. It has strengths in scenarios involving high dimensionality and technology domains, which aligns with the dataset properties. Although it generally requires high memory, it still remains the best choice given the alternative models are either less suitable for noisy data or have more severe weaknesses in handling tabular data under the given constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is suitable as it supports tabular data and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset properties. It is scalable to large datasets, which is important for this large dataset. While it prefers GPU and high memory, it still offers a short training time and can handle high dimensionality, making it a robust choice given the constraints of CPU and low memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice because it supports tabular data and is designed to handle noisy data effectively. It is scalable to large datasets, which is crucial given the data size, and offers short training times, aligning well with low resource availability (CPU, low memory) in the dataset properties. While GPU and high memory are strengths, the model's ability to handle noisy, large-scale tabular data without being limited by CPU requirements makes it the best option given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is efficient on large datasets and can be used effectively with high memory, which aligns well with the dataset's large size and technology domain. Although AutoEncoder typically benefits from GPU acceleration, it is scalable to large datasets without requiring a GPU, making it potentially adaptable to CPU usage with limited memory considerations." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected as the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling tabular data and large datasets. It is also efficient with high-dimensionality data, which fits the use case in the technology domain. Furthermore, it copes well with noisy data, a key characteristic of this dataset. Although AutoEncoder typically requires high memory and prefers a GPU, its capability to scale to large datasets and handle noisy data makes it a better fit compared to other models listed. Additionally, its short training time suits situations with limited computational resources." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset properties, which include large tabular data typically found in the technology domain that can be noisy. It handles noisy data well and is scalable to large datasets, aligning with the dataset size and noisy data characteristics. While it typically requires GPU for optimal performance due to its memory demands, it has a short training time. None of the other models meet the criteria of handling large tabular noisy data on a CPU with low memory better than AutoEncoder." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the given dataset properties because it efficiently handles tabular data with noise, which matches the dataset's characteristics of being large and noisy. It also has a strength in scalability to large datasets and can manage the data type (tabular) effectively. Despite its weakness of requiring high memory, it provides a good balance between short training time and the ability to manage noisy data. Considering the constraints related to CPU and low memory, while not ideal for AutoEncoder, it still provides an optimal fit among the given options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it supports tabular data and is capable of handling large datasets efficiently, which aligns with the dataset's tag of 'large' data size in the 'technology' domain. Additionally, AutoEncoder is strong in dealing with noisy data, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Although it has a weakness of requiring high memory (compared to the dataset's 'low memory' tag), its short training time and scalability to large datasets help mitigate this concern. It also effectively utilizes GPUs, which can be used to optimize performance within the CPU constraints if required." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the best choice as it supports tabular data, handles noisy data effectively, and scales well to large datasets, which are key requirements given the dataset properties. Additionally, AutoEncoder also benefits from having a short training time, which aligns well with the preference for low memory usage on CPU. Despite minor weaknesses with CPU, it is the most aligned model available with respect to strengths needed for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is suitable for handling large tabular datasets common in technology domains. It is adept at dealing with noisy data and is scalable to large datasets, which is required for the large dataset size. While it prefers GPU, its short training time is advantageous for CPU environments. The weaknesses related to real-time data and low-signal data are not a concern given the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it handles tabular data and noisy data well, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It is scalable to large datasets, which matches the 'large' data size tag. Despite its high memory requirement, its short training time and adaptability to noisy data make it the most suitable choice given the additional requirement of using CPU and low memory constraints. While not ideal for low memory, it is the best fit among the options, given the need for handling noisy data and scalability." + } + ], + "letter": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is a medium-sized image dataset from the education domain with a low memory requirement. VAE is well-suited for image data and can handle medium to large datasets efficiently. It also supports GPU acceleration and has a short training time, which is beneficial. While VAE typically requires high memory, it does not have a specific weakness for low memory, making it a reasonable compromise given the options. Overall, VAE's strengths in handling image data and educational domain alignment make it the most suitable choice from the given model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is best suited for this dataset because it excels with image data, which aligns with the dataset type tag. It also performs well on medium-sized datasets with high dimensionality that may contain noisy data, a common characteristic of image data. Although it is not tailored specifically for low memory environments, none of the models are strong in this aspect. Additionally, the AutoEncoder offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which can be advantageous as the dataset grows. This makes it the most suitable choice given the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for processing medium-sized image datasets, particularly in the educational domain. It is designed to handle images and high dimensionality effectively, and it provides a short training time which meets the requirement for low memory usage as it does not explicitly list low memory as a major weakness, unlike several other models. Additionally, VAE's capability to work with noisy data aligns well with potential challenges in handling image datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it supports image data with high dimensionality and is applicable in the education domain. It is well-suited for medium-sized datasets and offers short training times. Although it typically uses high memory, it is adaptable for image data, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics while offering high scalability, making it a viable option, despite not perfectly meeting the low memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected as it is strong in handling image data ('images') which matches the dataset's data type. It is also applicable in the domain of 'education' as per its strengths. VAE can manage high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, which can be beneficial for image datasets. Although it requires high memory, which contradicts the dataset's low memory requirement, its advantages in handling images and its compatibility with educational contexts outweigh this singular mismatch, especially considering other models have more severe weaknesses or lesser relevancy to the data tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling images, a medium dataset size, and its domain applicability in education. It supports high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns with typical characteristics of image datasets. Although VAE requires high memory, it offers a short training time, making it suitable for efficient processing within memory constraints when optimized appropriately. Additionally, it's scalable to large datasets if needed, which is a plus for medium-sized datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and requirements. VAE is strong in handling images, which is critical for this medium-sized image dataset, and it aligns well with the educational domain. Although it has high memory requirements, it has a short training time, which is beneficial for efficient processing. Other models either have weaknesses in handling image data, require high memory with long training times, or are not suitable for concerns such as dataset size or model scalability. VAE stands out by balancing its strengths effectively for the provided criteria." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is selected because it effectively handles images and is suitable for educational use cases. It thrives with high-dimensional data, which is common in image datasets. While it does not explicitly list low memory usage as a strength, its short training time compensates for this, and it scales well to medium-sized datasets, aligning with the dataset's 'medium' size tag. Moreover, the VAE addresses some noise in the data, which is a potential characteristic of educational datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable for the given dataset as it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. The dataset involves medium-sized images from the education domain, requiring low memory usage. VAE is strong in handling images, especially in educational contexts, due to its capabilities in processing high-dimensional data efficiently. Although VAE typically requires high memory, its short training time is advantageous for maintaining low memory consumption overall. Furthermore, the VAE's ability to handle noisy data is beneficial for real-world educational datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for image datasets, particularly in the education domain, with strengths that align well with the dataset properties. It handles high dimensionality and noisy data efficiently, which is often encountered in image datasets. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. While VAE has high memory requirements, it does not have low memory as a core weakness, making it more adaptable than other models like AnoGAN or MO-GAAL, which have low memory listed as a weakness. Overall, VAE's strengths match the dataset's characteristics and additional requirements best compared to the other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for the given dataset as it aligns well with the strengths needed for a medium-sized image dataset in the education domain. It efficiently handles high-dimensional and noisy data, is designed for image data, and operates effectively with GPUs. Despite requiring high memory, which contradicts the low memory requirement, it offers short training time and can work with large datasets, making it a practical choice given the other strengths it brings to the task." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is chosen due to its strengths in handling images, which aligns with the dataset type. It is also suitable for educational applications, stated as one of its strengths. Despite the dataset's requirement for low memory usage, which is a weakness for VAE, other models with similar strengths do not adequately meet the data size and type criteria or have other critical weaknesses. VAE's short training time is an added advantage for mid-sized datasets, which suggests it can be feasible within memory constraints if properly optimized." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it excels with image data, a key aspect of the dataset, and is applicable in the education domain. It supports medium data size and has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which might be relevant to this dataset. Although VAE requires high memory, it is one of the only models that suits image data from the model list and doesn't have 'low memory' as a key weakness. Additionally, VAE offers short training times, which is advantageous given the need for efficiency in educational applications." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model given the dataset characteristics. It is strong with image data, which matches the dataset type. Additionally, VAE is suitable for the education domain, as indicated in its strengths. While it does use high memory, it has a short training time and can handle large datasets well, aligning with the dataset's medium size. It also effectively manages high dimensionality and noisy data. Although it might not meet the low memory requirement perfectly, none of the other models handle the dataset properties as effectively as VAE, given the available model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for handling image data, which is a primary requirement of the dataset. It has strengths in education domains and can handle high dimensionality and noisy data, aligning closely with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which benefits a medium-sized dataset with low memory constraints. Although it requires high memory, its ability to work well with image data and the educational domain makes it the best choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it handles image data well and has relevant strengths in education, high dimensionality, and noisy data, aligning with the dataset's requirements. While it requires high memory, VAE has a short training time and can manage medium-sized datasets efficiently, making it a suitable choice amidst the models provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is related to images in the education domain, with a medium size and low memory requirements. Among the models, VAE has strengths in handling images, particularly in education and high-dimensional data, and it can cope with noisy data. Moreover, it offers short training times, which can be beneficial given the medium data size. Although it generally requires high memory, it balances this with significant strengths in the image domain, making it a more suitable choice than models with stronger memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for handling image data, which matches the dataset type. It also has strengths in dealing with high-dimensionality, noisy data and is applicable in educational contexts. Although it requires high memory, VAE's ability to operate with large datasets aligns with the medium data size specified. Importantly, it provides short training times, which helps mitigate memory demands in scenarios where low memory is a requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized image datasets, which align with the dataset characteristics. It is strong in handling images, educational domain applications, and is efficient with short training times. It also supports high dimensionality, which is typical in image data, without being adversely affected by the model's weaknesses. Although it does require high memory, it doesn't specifically list low memory as a weakness, unlike several other models, making it a viable choice given the dataset's requirement of low memory accommodations. Overall, VAE's strengths closely match the dataset needs more than the other models listed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for image data within the education domain, which is supported by its strengths in handling high-dimensionality and noisy data typical of images. While it requires high memory, which is generally a weakness, it compensates with short training times and scalability to large datasets. Its specific use case in education and image processing aligns well, and other models either have weaknesses in image processing or limited scalability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the dataset properties, which include medium-sized image data for the education domain with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE has strengths in handling images, supports high dimensionality, can work efficiently with noisy data, and has short training times suitable for large datasets. Although VAE requires high memory, its compatibility with images and education data, along with its fast processing, outweigh the weaknesses of memory usage given that other models have limitations either in handling images or memory efficiency." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for medium-sized image data and is capable of handling high-dimensional datasets, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also supports GPU acceleration and has a short training time, making it efficient in terms of computational resources. Although it has weaknesses such as imbalanced data handling, there is no indication in the dataset tags that this is a concern. The need for low memory usage could be a consideration, but among the options, AutoEncoder seems to be the best fit for the given dataset's domain (education) and data type (images)." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is suitable for medium-sized image datasets, fits well within the education domain, and performs efficiently with noisy data. It can handle high dimensionality and benefits from GPU resources. Although it typically requires high memory, it offers short training times, which partly aligns with the 'low memory' requirement by reducing computation time. Compared to other models, VAE has strengths that align well with the provided dataset properties, and its weaknesses are less relevant to the stated requirements (e.g., it does not heavily rely on CPU or involve real-time data, which were not part of the dataset tags)." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the dataset because it supports images and the education domain, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It is designed to handle medium-sized datasets with high dimensionality and has strengths in image data. Additionally, the VAE model provides short training time and is scalable to large datasets, accommodating the 'medium' data size requirement. Although it has high memory usage, it does not have a critical weakness in low memory settings, making it a more suitable choice compared to models with clear low memory weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is chosen because it is highly suitable for image data, which aligns with the data_type tag of the dataset. Additionally, it is optimized for medium-sized datasets in domains like education. While it requires higher memory, it meets the low training time requirement and can handle high dimensionality and noisy data effectively. Despite the low memory requirement in additional needs, its compatibility with the dataset's characteristics\u2014images and education\u2014makes it the most balanced choice compared to other models that might struggle with low memory performance or are not ideal for image data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is most suitable for the given dataset because it has strengths in handling image data, is relevant to the education domain, and can manage high dimensionality and noisy data. While it requires high memory, which conflicts with the low memory requirement, other choices like AnoGAN or AE1SVM have more significant drawbacks aligned with the dataset's tags. VAE also offers short training time and scalability, which are beneficial for medium-sized datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for images and fits within the education domain, which matches the dataset characteristics. Despite its weakness of requiring high memory, it is capable of handling noisy data and high dimensionality, which might be beneficial depending on the dataset features. Additionally, it has a short training time and scalability to large datasets. Although it is not the perfect fit in terms of low memory requirement, it offers the best trade-off considering other strengths aligned with the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this medium-sized image dataset in the education domain with low memory requirements. VAE has strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It also offers short training times and is suitable for large datasets, although it requires careful memory management. Other models with image support, like AnoGAN and AE1SVM, have significant weaknesses in low memory settings or longer training times, making them less ideal. Overall, VAE strikes a balance with its short training time and ability to handle high dimensionality, making it the best fit within the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable as it excels in handling image data and is relevant in the education domain. It supports high dimensionality and large datasets, which aligns with the given data size. Although it requires high memory, it compensates with a short training time, making it a more memory-efficient choice compared to other models. Moreover, the additional strengths in handling noisy data and compatibility with educational content make it a preferable choice amongst the models that struggle with image data or have prolonged training times." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable because it effectively handles image data, which is the type of data present in the dataset. It is also applicable in the education domain, which aligns with the dataset tags. Although the dataset requires low memory, which is a weakness of VAE, VAE's strengths in handling high dimensionality, short training time, and compatibility with large datasets outweigh this weakness. It also effectively processes noisy data, which is a typical characteristic of educational datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for medium-sized image datasets and has specific strengths in the education domain, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It supports images, operates efficiently in high dimensionality, and is designed to handle noisy data. While VAE requires high memory, it does not specifically list low memory as a weakness, unlike some other models. It also features a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it suitable given the provided requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for image data, which is the data type of the dataset. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which are common in image datasets. It is also relevant to the education domain, matching one of the dataset tags. Additionally, the model has a short training time and scalability to large datasets, which are beneficial given the medium data size. While the model is high memory, the competing models have other specific weaknesses such as suitability for low memory applications, which aligns with the additional requirements of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is most suitable because it is strong in handling image data, which matches the data type specified in the dataset tags. Additionally, VAE is applicable in the education domain and can efficiently deal with medium-sized datasets, leveraging its short training time and ability to work with high dimensionality. While VAE is generally high in memory usage, it provides support for GPU, balancing the considerations of memory requirements and scalability within the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized image datasets, particularly in the education domain. It is well-suited to handle high-dimensional image data, operates efficiently on GPUs, and offers a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's need for low memory usage. While it does require high memory, its strengths in dealing with images, specifically in the education domain, make it more appropriate compared to other models in the list. Despite the dataset's low memory requirement, none of the models perfectly covers all aspects, but VAE provides the best overall fit for the given context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized image datasets in the education domain, as it is strong in handling image data and is applicable to education. It supports high dimensionality and noisy data, which is essential for image recognition. Despite requiring high memory, VAE is compatible with GPU and offers short training times, making it a relatively efficient option given the low memory requirement constraint. It does not have significant weaknesses for this use case, unlike other models that struggle with images or have worse memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized image datasets in the education domain. It has strengths in handling images, is associated with the education domain, supports high dimensionality, and is efficient on GPUs. It provides short training times which is important due to the requirement for low memory usage. Although it does not explicitly mention 'low memory' as a strength, it manages well with high memory efficiency and large datasets, which can contribute to optimized usage in a medium-sized dataset context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, focused on images within the education domain, and has a low memory requirement. Among the options, SO-GAAL is well-suited for image data and efficient training. Although it generally requires a GPU, its short training time compensates for memory constraints, making it a practical choice for medium data where low memory usage is required." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized image datasets and is specifically strong in educational domains. It supports high dimensionality and handles noisy data effectively, which are important for image-based datasets. While it has high memory requirements, it offers short training times and can be scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset's need for low memory use relative to other options that either require longer training times or are not as scalable." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized image datasets in the education domain, as it handles images well and has strengths in education. Although it requires high memory, which is a consideration, it has a short training time and can process large datasets. It is better aligned with the dataset requirements compared to other models, as it supports images directly and manages high dimensionality effectively, which is important for image data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for a medium-sized image dataset in the education domain with a requirement for low memory usage. It has strengths in handling images, education-specific datasets, high dimensionality, noisy data, and has a relatively short training time. While it typically requires high memory, it does not have a specific weakness in low memory environments like some other models, making it a more balanced choice given the dataset properties and specified model constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a suitable choice due to its strengths in handling image data, education domain relevance, and compatibility with medium-sized datasets while providing short training times. Although VAE requires high memory, its strengths in handling images and maintaining scalability to large datasets align well with the dataset's needs. Other models either lack the strengths for image data or are unsuitable due to memory constraints, such as AnoGAN, AE1SVM, and ALAD." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for medium-sized image datasets, particularly in the education domain. It handles high dimensionality and noisy data efficiently, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Although it has high memory requirements, it maintains a balance between short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it the most fitting choice given the dataset's low memory requirement constraint compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it is strong in handling image data, which matches the data type 'images' of the dataset. Additionally, VAE fits the domain 'education' and is capable of dealing with high dimensionality and some noisy data, which are likely characteristics of the dataset. Despite the 'high memory' weakness, it offers short training time, making it more suitable for medium-sized datasets with a need for efficiency. Other models with a strength in images either have longer training times or don't address the specific domain or data characteristics as effectively as VAE." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized datasets involving images and the educational domain. It is compatible with high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Despite having a 'high memory' requirement, it provides short training time and scalability to large datasets, which can be advantageous even for medium-sized datasets. Other models either have more significant limitations with memory or are less compatible with image data, making VAE the most balanced choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, consists of images, falls within the education domain, and has a low memory requirement. VAE excels with images, is applicable in the education domain, supports high dimensionality, and can handle noisy data, which are important dataset characteristics. Although VAE typically requires higher memory, its ability to work with images and handle medium-sized datasets makes it the best choice considering the options available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable for the given dataset properties because it has strengths in handling images and educational data, which are consistent with the dataset's domain. It also operates efficiently with medium data sizes and offers short training times. Despite its weakness in high memory use, it does not have an explicit weakness in low memory environments, making it a viable option compared to the other models, which have more pronounced weaknesses related to memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it's well-suited for medium-sized image datasets in the education domain. It specializes in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which is beneficial given the dataset's characteristics. Although VAE has high memory requirements, it offers strengths in managing images and provides scalability and short training times, making it a fitting choice for this use case despite the low memory requirement mentioned." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it has strengths in handling image data, aligns well with the education domain, and is capable of managing high-dimensional data with noisy characteristics, which are relevant given the dataset tags. Although it typically requires high memory, it offers short training times which can be beneficial for efficient processing in a medium-sized dataset. The other models either do not perform well with image data in the educational context, require high memory, or have other weaknesses that make them less suitable for this particular dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset because it specifically caters to images, which is the data type in question. Although it has a high memory requirement, it matches the medium data size and domain of education. Additionally, VAE supports high dimensionality, performs well with noisy data, and has a short training time. These attributes align well with the dataset's structure and requirements. Other models like AnoGAN and AutoEncoder also handle images well, but VAE uniquely balances the medium data size with the need for efficient processing, making it the best choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for image processing, aligns with the education domain, and can handle medium-sized datasets efficiently. It is also capable of utilizing GPUs and has a relatively short training time, which matches the low memory requirement constraint better than other models. Additionally, VAE's capability to manage high dimensionality and noisy data makes it an appropriate choice for the given dataset properties." + } + ], + "musk": [ + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It can handle large datasets and requires high memory, making it an appropriate choice given the CPU and high memory requirements. Additionally, it includes scalability to large datasets as one of its strengths, making it more suitable than models that either require GPUs or have limited scalability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset consists of tabular data with high dimensionality, which suits the strengths of the AutoEncoder model as it is effective with high dimensional and noisy data, works well on tabular datasets, and is scalable to large datasets. Additionally, it supports high memory usage which matches the dataset's characteristics for high memory. AutoEncoder's capability for short training time also fits well with the resource requirements of using CPU. Its weaknesses related to small data size, audio, and video data types are irrelevant here." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it has strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality, is scalable to large datasets, and can utilize high memory which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it supports scenarios requiring GPUs, which aligns well with the additional requirements of high memory. While it doesn't excel with CPU usage, its ability to manage noisy data and provide short training time makes it an optimal choice given the dataset properties and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is highly suited for tabular data with high dimensionality and is capable of handling large datasets, aligning well with the dataset properties. It is designed for high memory environments and has a short training time, which matches the CPU and high memory requirement. Additionally, its strengths include scalability to large datasets and effective handling of noise, making it a suitable choice given the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and large datasets. It is capable of efficiently using high memory resources, which aligns with the dataset requirements. Additionally, AutoEncoder has a short training time and can be scaled to large datasets, making it an optimal choice for the given conditions." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is highly suitable for the dataset because it handles tabular data effectively and excels with high dimensionality and large datasets. It also supports high memory, which aligns well with the dataset's additional requirements. Despite its weakness in CPU environments, it compensates with strengths in scalability and short training time using GPUs, making it the best choice considering the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets, which matches the dataset characteristics of having high dimensionality and being large in size. The AutoEncoder can handle tabular data efficiently, offers scalability to large datasets, and supports high memory capacity. Even though it's more optimal with GPU, it remains a fitting choice given the requirement for high memory, which aligns with its strengths, and it maintains a short training time." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset properties which include high dimensionality and tabular data. It effectively handles large datasets and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. While AE1SVM has a weakness with CPU usage, this is mitigated by its strengths such as scalability to large datasets and short training time, making it the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and model analyses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected as it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It handles high dimensionality and is suited for tabular data, both key aspects of the dataset. AE1SVM is also scalable to large datasets, accommodates high memory requirements, and has a short training time, making it suitable given the dataset size and specified constraints. Although it may struggle slightly with CPU usage, its strengths outweigh this, compared to the other models whose weaknesses are more prominent in relation to the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also scalable to large datasets and capable of working with high memory, aligning with the additional requirements of the dataset. Furthermore, AE1SVM features short training time, making it efficient for the model's computational capabilities. Despite its weakness of requiring GPU for full effectiveness, it remains more aligned with the given dataset compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is a suitable model for the dataset because it handles tabular data well and is effective with high dimensionality, which is a characteristic of the dataset. It is scalable to large datasets and supports high memory, aligning with the dataset's requirements. Additionally, AutoEncoder has a short training time, which is advantageous given the size of the data. While it primarily uses GPU, the requirement for CPU is noted as a weakness across several models, making AutoEncoder a balanced choice despite this limitation." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is chosen because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, matching the dataset properties. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time on GPU, which suits the 'large data size' and 'high memory' requirements. While its weaknesses include CPU usage, it primarily functions on GPU, making it compatible with 'high memory' needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is highly suitable for the given dataset properties as it supports tabular data and handles high-dimensionality effectively. It is scalable to large datasets, requires high memory, and has a short training time, which corresponds well with the dataset's characteristics of large size and high memory requirements. Additionally, its strengths in processing tabular data and scalability make it a suitable choice over models with CPU requirements or longer training times." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets and has strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data. It is scalable to large datasets and performs well on high dimensionality while requiring high memory, which aligns with the dataset's CPU and memory capabilities. Despite its weakness in CPU preference, its scalability and alignment with high dimensionality and short training time make it the best choice among the given models for the provided dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and characterized by high dimensionality, requiring high memory support and CPU compatibility. AutoEncoder is a suitable choice as it can efficiently handle large, high-dimensional datasets, supports tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets. Additionally, its ability to handle noisy data and high memory requirements aligns with the dataset's characteristics. While it has weaknesses with CPU usage, its strengths align well with the dataset's high dimensionality and large size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It excels in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and operates effectively with high memory, both of which are requirements of the dataset. The model's weaknesses related to CPU and long training time are not a concern since CPU is an additional requirement, not a necessity, and AE1SVM benefits from high memory, which can mitigate longer training times." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable because it handles high dimensionality, works well with tabular data, and is capable of scaling to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags provided. Additionally, while it requires high memory, it does not have the CPU-specific limitations that would adversely affect its performance for this dataset type. Given its short training time and adaptability to high dimensional data, it is also a good fit for the 'large' data size characteristic of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the given dataset as it is capable of handling tabular data with high dimensionality and large data sizes. It supports scaling to large datasets and has a short training time, making it compatible with high memory scenarios. Although it prefers a GPU, it is one of the few models that does not explicitly require high memory or GPU resources. The combination of handling high dimensionality and the ability to scale with high memory requirements makes it the most appropriate choice given the dataset properties, despite its weakness of performing on CPU efficiently." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice for this dataset, as it excels with tabular data, which matches the data type in the dataset properties. Additionally, it handles high dimensionality well and is scalable to large datasets, accommodating the dataset's size and characteristics. While it does have a CPU weakness, its strengths in supporting high memory requirements balance this, making it a suitable choice for deployment on a system with high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and characterized by high dimensionality, which aligns well with the strengths of the AutoEncoder. This model can handle high memory requirements and is scalable to large datasets. It is also a suitable choice for tabular data and performs well with high dimensionality. Although it has a weakness for real-time data, this characteristic is not present in the dataset requirements, making the AutoEncoder the most appropriate choice from the provided list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is a suitable choice for this dataset as it is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets, can handle high memory requirements, and benefits from short training times, addressing the dataset's needs for CPU and high memory utilization. Additionally, AE1SVM supports sparse and imbalanced data, which can be advantageous for high-dimensional datasets. Despite its weaknesses in handling smaller datasets and real-time data, these are not relevant concerns given the dataset's properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, can efficiently handle large datasets, and meets the CPU and high memory requirements. It also supports short training time, which is beneficial for large data. Despite having a weakness with imbalanced data, it aligns well with the dataset properties provided, whereas other models have significant drawbacks regarding tabular data or the need for GPU, which the dataset tags don't suggest." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality, which aligns well with the strengths of AE1SVM. This model is suitable for high dimensionality and tabular data, can handle large datasets efficiently, and works well with high memory environments. While AE1SVM generally prefers GPUs, the dataset's characteristics related to CPU and high memory make it an applicable choice, as it is the closest match given the need to process large and complex datasets with high dimensionality." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset as it effectively handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It also supports high memory and is scalable to large datasets, aligning with the dataset's requirements. Additionally, its strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data complement the dataset needs, despite requiring GPU for optimal performance." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset has high dimensionality and is tabular, which aligns well with the strengths of the AutoEncoder model. It can handle high dimensionality and noisy data effectively. Additionally, the model is designed to be scalable to large datasets with high memory requirements, making it suitable for the given dataset properties. Despite requiring GPU, which aligns with the hardware, it does not have real-time or imbalanced data weaknesses that are less relevant in this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is a suitable choice for this dataset because it handles tabular data and high dimensionality well, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets and supports high memory requirements, both key attributes of the dataset. Additionally, it has a short training time and works effectively on imbalanced and sparse data. The dataset's requirement for CPU and its high memory usage fit within the strengths of AE1SVM. While it has weaknesses such as handling noisy data and requiring long training time on a CPU, its advantages align more closely with the dataset characteristics compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the best choice because it is well-suited for handling high-dimensional and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is scalable to large datasets and fits well with the requirement for high memory usage. Although it has a weakness for CPU usage, its other attributes align closely with the dataset requirements, making it a suitable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It can handle large datasets efficiently while leveraging high memory resources, both of which are requirements of the dataset. Its ability for short training time and handling noisy data adds to its compatibility with the dataset properties, despite being more optimized for a GPU rather than a CPU. Other models have limitations with tabular data or high memory usage whereas AutoEncoder aligns well with the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, high dimensional, tabular, and requires a model with high memory capacity. AutoEncoder is suitable because it handles tabular data well, is highly scalable for large datasets, excels in high dimensionality, and supports GPU utilization, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements for CPU and high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is selected because it handles high dimensional tabular data effectively, which aligns with the dataset properties. It is scalable to large datasets and benefits from GPU and high memory, matching the additional requirements. Furthermore, it has a short training time, making it suitable for the task at hand. Despite its weakness in CPU preference, its overall strengths make it the most suitable choice given the dataset characteristics provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the dataset properties, including large data size, tabular data, and high dimensionality. It is capable of handling high memory requirements and is scalable to large datasets, which align with the dataset's additional requirements of CPU and high memory. Additionally, it has short training time and supports GPU processing, which is advantageous. While it does have weaknesses with small data size and low-signal data, these do not apply to the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for high dimensionality and tabular data, both of which match the characteristics of the dataset. It is also capable of handling large datasets with a short training time and high memory, aligning well with the dataset requirements. Furthermore, AutoEncoder's strengths include handling noisy data, which may be beneficial given the dataset's potential complexity. Although it typically requires a GPU environment, its ability to scale to large datasets makes it the most suitable choice among the listed models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice because it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also good for handling large datasets and has the capability to work with noisy data. Additionally, it is scalable and has efficiency in utilizing high memory requirements, which aligns well with the given dataset properties. Despite its weakness in handling small data sizes or requiring a CPU, the large data size and specific compatibility with GPUs and high memory make it a strong contender overall." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable for this dataset because it handles tabular data well and is optimized for high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it supports high memory usage and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the additional requirements of the dataset. Despite its weaknesses in handling CPU processing, it remains a strong candidate due to its adaptability with large and complex datasets needing high memory and GPU support." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality, with the requirement for high memory. AutoEncoder is well-suited for handling high dimensionality and tabular data, showing strengths in scalability to large datasets and high memory usage. Additionally, it provides short training time, making it efficient for large datasets while accommodating high memory needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, consists of tabular data with high dimensionality, and requires high memory. AutoEncoder matches these dataset properties effectively as it is suited for large datasets and tabular data, handles high dimensionality well, and is compatible with high memory requirements. While AutoEncoder typically benefits from GPU, the need for CPU can be addressed by appropriate configuration or tuning. Its scalability and short training time also align with handling large, complex datasets efficiently." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and large tabular data. It is also scalable to large datasets, which suits the given dataset size. Moreover, AE1SVM operates well with high memory requirements and provides short training times, aligning with the additional dataset requirements of CPU and high memory. While LUNAR and AutoEncoder are also strong candidates, AE1SVM's specialization in tabular data and scalability with short training time makes it the optimal choice for the given dataset conditions." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is strong in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of this dataset. Additionally, AE1SVM is scalable to large datasets and supports high memory requirements, aligning well with the dataset's requirement for handling large data on CPUs with high memory. Despite being less favorable for small datasets and real-time data, these are not concerns for the current dataset, making AE1SVM a solid choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the best choice for the given dataset because it handles tabular data very well and is designed to work with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It performs efficiently on large datasets and can handle noisy data, which is an additional advantage. Though it requires high memory and uses a GPU for optimal performance, it supports short training times and scales effectively, making it ideal for this large, high-dimensional dataset on a CPU with high memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and model characteristics. It supports tabular data and high dimensionality, both critical characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it can handle large datasets efficiently and requires high memory, which aligns well with the dataset's specified requirements. The AutoEncoder's short training time is also beneficial given the computational limitations of using a CPU. It covers the weaknesses associated with using a CPU by not relying solely on GPU, unlike some other models like AnoGAN or ALAD that have a strong GPU dependency." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice for the dataset characterized by large size, tabular data, and high dimensionality, which requires robust handling with high memory capacity and scalability. AE1SVM effectively supports high dimensionality and tabular data, offers scalability to large datasets, and operates well with GPU resources. While it mentions a weakness with CPU usage, it aligns closely with the requirement of high memory and is tailored for short training times, making it a fitting option given the dataset characteristics and model strengths." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is chosen because it excels with large, high-dimensional tabular data, which matches the dataset's properties. It has strengths in dealing with noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics, and it is capable of handling large datasets efficiently. Additionally, it supports high memory usage, which is a requirement. The quick training time and scalability are advantageous, ensuring efficient use of CPU resources despite the model's typical preference for GPUs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It supports large datasets and requires high memory, which matches the dataset properties. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, its ability to handle large, high-dimensional tabular datasets on a GPU makes it the best fit among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it is well-suited for handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is scalable to large datasets and requires high memory, matching the additional requirements. While it is not optimized for CPU, its strengths in tabular data and high dimensionality make it the most suitable choice given the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the best choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data efficiently. It is scalable to large datasets and is well-suited for high memory requirements, as noted in the dataset tags. Additionally, the AutoEncoder supports noisy data which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. Despite its CPU weakness, its other strengths make it the most suitable choice among the given models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of 'large', 'tabular data', and 'high dimensionality'. Additionally, AE1SVM supports high memory usage and is scalable to large datasets, addressing the dataset's requirement for 'high memory'. While it may have a longer training time and requires a GPU, these constraints do not conflict with the dataset's properties, making it a strong candidate given the other available options from the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is optimal for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, which are key properties of the dataset. It is scalable to large datasets and can utilize high memory, which aligns well with the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, this model has a short training time and works well with noisy data, further complementing the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is best suited for this dataset as it handles tabular data well, supports high dimensionality, scales to large datasets, and has a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of being large and high-dimensional. Although it prefers GPU, which is compatible, it can operate with high memory. Its strengths in dealing with noisy data are beneficial too. Despite the preference for a GPU, its overall compatibility with the dataset needs makes it the most appropriate choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset has large size, is of tabular type, and exhibits high dimensionality, which aligns well with the strengths of AutoEncoder. AutoEncoder is adept at handling tabular data and high dimensionality, and it is scalable to large datasets while operating efficiently with high memory. Despite the dataset requiring CPU capability, AutoEncoder supports efficient processing with its high memory strength, and its short training time is advantageous. Thus, AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is best suited for the given dataset properties as it supports tabular data and can handle high dimensionality effectively. It is scalable to large datasets and has strengths in handling noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics provided. Additionally, the model's demand for high memory aligns with the dataset's 'high memory' requirement, making it an excellent fit for the given conditions." + } + ], + "vowels": [ + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset requires a model with low memory usage and ability to handle medium-sized time series data. While none of the models explicitly list time series as a strength, AutoEncoder does not specify it as a weakness and offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it suitable for medium-sized datasets with potential high dimensionality. Additionally, the requirement for low memory outweighs the minor weaknesses related to imbalanced data and low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is selected because it handles medium-sized datasets efficiently, can process noisy data well, and works with high dimensionality. While it is noted for its preference for high memory usage, in this dataset context with the given constraints, it is preferable over the others due to its strengths in large datasets and short training times which support scalability and low-memory requirements better than the weaknesses of other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is chosen as it can handle medium-sized datasets and is scalable to large datasets. While it doesn't explicitly specialize in time series data, it possesses strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which can be beneficial. Despite its weaknesses with small datasets and low-memory requirements, its short training time and adequate scalability make it more suitable than other models for this dataset's constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for medium-sized datasets and excels with high dimensionality and sparse data. Although it has weaknesses regarding low memory, it is the most compatible option given that the dataset is a time series. Other models either have weaknesses specific to time series data or have more severe memory usage issues. AE1SVM's high memory usage can be mitigated better than models like MO-GAAL or AnoGAN, which also have incompatibilities with time series data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, pertains to a time-series domain, and needs a model with low memory requirements. Although AutoEncoder has a weakness with small data sizes, this does not apply here. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which can be encountered in time series datasets. Additionally, it requires a short training time and is scalable, which is beneficial for medium-sized datasets. AutoEncoder is the best fit among the given options, as other models exhibit significant weaknesses related to time series or low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset tags and requirements. Although time series data is not explicitly mentioned in the strengths, AutoEncoders can be adapted to handle time series data effectively, especially when it involves feature extraction or anomaly detection tasks. The dataset is of medium size and requires low memory usage; while AutoEncoders are generally categorized under high memory models, they can be designed to be memory-efficient with smaller architectures and proper tuning. Additionally, AutoEncoders have strengths in scalability to large datasets, short training time, and applicability to high-dimensional, noisy data types that are common in time series tasks, which makes them a viable choice considering the constraints and the characteristics of the dataset provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized and involves time series data with a requirement for low memory usage. AutoEncoder is a good choice as it has strengths in handling time series data indirectly through dimensionality reduction, it is scalable to larger datasets, and offers short training time. While it typically requires high memory, it can be adjusted for medium-sized data through appropriate configurations. The challenges with other models include weaknesses directly associated with time series data or higher memory requirements without scalability options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "The dataset is a medium-sized time series with a low memory requirement. While none of the models perfectly match all criteria, Deep SVDD is somewhat suitable because it handles high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets (which conveys adaptability). Although it has a long training time and memory issues, it is the closest fit available from the list, as most other models explicitly list time series or low memory as weaknesses. Careful model design and optimization could help manage memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is a medium-sized time series data with a requirement for low memory usage. While none of the listed models is specifically designed for time series, VAE has strengths in handling high-dimensional data and works well with datasets that are not real-time. Despite requiring high memory, it has strong compatibility with datasets that are bigger in size. Given the constraints and dataset characteristics, VAE is the most suitable option due to its adaptability and ability to efficiently process medium-sized datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable for medium-sized datasets and can handle high-dimensionality and noisy data, which are common in time series data. Although it does not explicitly mention time series as a strength, it has a broad application in handling complex data types. Additionally, AutoEncoder offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which compensates for its high memory requirement given the requirement for low memory preferences over time. Other models have specific weaknesses on time series data or low memory which makes AutoEncoder the more balanced choice among the provided options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "Although AutoEncoder does not specialize specifically in time series data, it is suitable for medium-sized datasets and offers a balance between high dimensional data processing and resilience to noisy data. Given the requirements for low memory usage, it is the least unsuitable compared to other models, despite its high memory preference. Other models have explicit weaknesses against time series data or high memory usage, which makes them less suitable choices for this dataset scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is a medium-sized time series requiring low memory usage. AutoEncoder is suitable due to its ability to handle high-dimensional datasets with noisy data, possesses short training time, offers scalability to large datasets, and strong performance with GPU processing. Although AutoEncoder is not specifically focused on time series, its overall strengths align better with the given requirements compared to other models, which either have weaknesses with low memory or time series data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is a medium-sized time series dataset with a requirement for low memory usage. AutoEncoder is suitable due to its short training time and scalability to large datasets. While it typically requires high memory, its suitability for high dimensionality and noisy data makes it a better fit compared to other models in this list for time series data, especially when other models like SO-GAAL, DevNet, and ALAD have explicit weaknesses in handling time series data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is chosen because it primarily handles high-dimensional data and is scalable to large datasets. While it has weaknesses such as long training time and high memory usage, the dataset's additional requirement for low memory is a challenge across nearly all models. Deep SVDD is the closest match as it offers some scalability, and the dataset format as a time series is not explicitly listed as a weakness for this model. Certainly, the model selection is not perfect due to inherent dataset constraints and model capabilities mismatch, but Deep SVDD stands out as the most relevant option." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is a medium-sized time series with low memory requirements. AutoEncoder can handle high dimensionality and medium-sized datasets effectively with short training times and scalability to large datasets. Despite being weak with real-time data, which is not specified as a need here, it is suitable for handling noisy data and supports GPU, which can help mitigate any resource concerns. Other models in the list typically have significant weaknesses for either time series or low memory environments, making AutoEncoder the most balanced choice given the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "Although none of the models are perfectly suited for time series data and low memory requirements, AutoEncoder is a more generalized model that can handle medium-sized datasets effectively and operates well with high dimensionality and noisy data. It also benefits from short training times and good scalability, which makes it more adaptable to a variety of situations beyond its primary strengths, even if low memory is a limitation as noted in combination with high memory requirement. None of the available models explicitly support both time series and low memory, but AutoEncoder's flexibility and scalability across different data types give it an edge over other options in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it can handle medium-sized datasets, is suitable for domains requiring low memory usage, and accommodates high dimensionality data, which matches the dataset properties. Even though it has weaknesses with small data sizes and specific types of imbalanced data, those weaknesses do not heavily apply to the given dataset provided. It also offers a short training time which aligns with additional requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is chosen because it handles medium-sized datasets well, works efficiently with time series data, and is able to manage noisy data efficiently. While it requires high memory and GPU, the strengths in handling high dimensionality and scalable datasets make it a suitable candidate. Although it is not specifically optimized for low memory, none of the models are perfectly aligned with all of the requirements, making AutoEncoder the most balanced option given the dataset characteristics and model analyses provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the best choice for a medium-sized time series dataset with low memory requirements. While it does have challenges with small data sizes and memory-intensive processes, it is scalable to large datasets and performs well with high dimensionality and noisy data, both of which are common in time series data. It also has the advantage of short training times and, importantly, supports application across multiple domains, which suits the dataset's unspecified domain category and additional low memory requirement despite specific weaknesses in low-memory scenarios." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected because it has the capability to handle time series data due to its adaptability in capturing complex patterns in high-dimensional data which can be beneficial for time series analysis. Additionally, it requires short training time and can be efficient with GPU support, which suits the dataset's requirement for low memory usage. While it does have a weakness with small data size, the dataset size is medium, which should be adequate. Other models either explicitly list time series as a weakness or require high memory, which is unsuitable given the dataset's constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized and is a time series type with a low memory requirement. Although none of the models have strengths directly associated with time series data, the AutoEncoder is capable of handling medium-sized datasets, has strengths in handling technological data with high dimensionality and noisy data, and can scale well to large datasets, which may indirectly benefit time series. Despite the low memory requirement, AutoEncoder's strength in short training times is beneficial. Other models, such as DevNet and ALAD, explicitly state weaknesses against time series data. Moreover, AutoEncoder does not specify weakness in memory constraints, making it a balanced choice given the constraints and alternatives." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model considering the dataset properties. While the dataset is a time series, which is not explicitly a strength of the AutoEncoder, it is not a weakness either. Furthermore, the dataset requires low memory usage. The AutoEncoder's general weakness is with small data sizes, but with a medium-sized dataset, this issue is less prominent. The capacity of AutoEncoders for handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets makes it flexible enough to be adapted adequately to handle time series data, given the other models have explicit weaknesses in either time series or memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized and characterized as a time series with a requirement for low memory usage. Most models in the list either have weaknesses with time series data or high memory consumption. The AutoEncoder, however, is suitable for high-dimensional, noisy data and offers short training times. Although it is typically high memory, it balances the pros and cons better than other options. Additionally, AutoEncoder's ability to handle medium-sized datasets and scale to large datasets makes it a pragmatic choice despite its general weaknesses not favoring low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "Despite the dataset being time series and having a requirement for low memory usage, the AutoEncoder model is the most suitable option because it supports time series data indirectly through transformation and feature extraction. It provides strengths such as scalability to large datasets and short training time, which aligns with the medium data size and the requirement for low memory usage, while having minimal impact from its weaknesses on this application." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is chosen because it handles high dimensionality, noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets\u2014all important for a medium-sized time series dataset. While AutoEncoder typically relies on GPU and high memory usage, its short training time aligns well with the need for low memory requirements compared to other models, such as AnoGAN and AE1SVM, which have long training times and issues with scalability or memory. Other models, like ALAD and DevNet, have weaknesses in handling time series data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is a medium-sized time series with a requirement for low memory usage. Although no model perfectly fits all criteria, an AutoEncoder is relatively more adaptable to medium-sized datasets and time series data compared to others. It supports GPU, which can help in maintaining low memory usage, and it has a short training time, which benefits from quick processing. Despite some weaknesses in real-time and low-memory applications, it provides versatility across domains and data types, making it the most balanced option available from the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is a medium-sized time series with a low memory requirement. While none of the models are perfectly suited for time series data with low memory requirements, the AutoEncoder model has strengths in handling medium-sized datasets, high dimensionality, and scalability to large datasets without consuming excessive memory. Its short training time is also beneficial for time series tasks. Although it doesn't specialize in time series, it is a versatile model that can be adapted for varied applications, making it a suitable choice given the options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is a medium-sized time series with a requirement for low memory usage. While none of the models are perfectly suited for time series analysis, the AutoEncoder model is somewhat more versatile, handling high dimensionality and noisy data (common in time series) effectively. Although it does not mention low memory explicitly, AutoEncoder manages to handle various data types and large datasets efficiently, making it a slightly better fit given the constraints. The other models have more significant weaknesses in relation to time series data or require high memory, which is unsuitable for this dataset's requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is of medium size, is a time series, and requires low memory consumption. While AutoEncoder is typically high memory, it has the necessary strengths for handling high-dimensional, noisy data and is scalable to large datasets with a short training time. Though not explicitly strong in time series, it fits better than others given the constraints, as many other models are unsuitable for time series or are high in memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable for the dataset properties since it is scalable to medium-sized datasets and operates well with high dimensionality, which is common in time series data. It also handles noisy data effectively. Although it generally requires high memory, the focus on short training time aligns with the requirement for efficiency. The weaknesses related to small data size and real-time data are not pertinent here, making the AutoEncoder a viable choice given the requirements and dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AnoGAN", + "reason": "Although none of the models are perfectly suited for a medium-sized, low-memory time series dataset, AnoGAN is chosen as it has fewer critical weaknesses related to memory compared to most other models. Despite its limitation with low memory and real-time data, its lack of other time series-focused alternatives makes it relatively better fitted for this selection. Other models have significant weaknesses with time series data, which is a crucial aspect of this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "Although none of the models is specifically tailored for time series data in the provided list, AutoEncoder has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, making it versatile. Additionally, it offers short training times and is scalable to large datasets, which can be beneficial for medium-sized datasets. While it has weaknesses with small data sizes and lacks some time-series-specific capabilities, its overall strengths align more closely with the dataset tags provided, especially under the constraint of suitable low-memory models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is selected due to its ability to handle medium-sized datasets in a memory-efficient manner. Although this is a time series dataset and AutoEncoder is not specifically strong in handling time series data, its efficiency with respect to memory and scalable to large datasets makes it a viable option considering the low memory requirement and the medium data size. Other models like DevNet, ALAD, and LUNAR have explicit weaknesses in handling time series data. AutoEncoder's capability to manage noisy data, short training time, and scalability make it the most suitable given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it is suitable for medium-sized datasets, handles time series data, and offers low memory requirements compared to other models in the list. Its strengths in handling high-dimensional and noisy data align well with typical characteristics of time series datasets. While not explicitly mentioned for time series, it provides the best trade-off in terms of adaptability and resource requirements, especially given the need for low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "Given the dataset tags of medium-sized time series data with a requirement for low memory, AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice. It supports high dimensionality and noisy data, which can be prevalent in time series datasets. Although it typically requires high memory, it compensates with a short training time and good scalability to larger datasets. While not optimally suited for small data sizes or real-time processing, its overall alignment with the data characteristics makes it the best fit from the available model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which are advantageous for medium-sized datasets. Although it has a weakness with time series data, the other models either have low memory as a weakness, are not suited for time series, or have long training times. LUNAR's strength in being scalable and efficient outweighs its one weakness in the given context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is chosen because it effectively handles medium-sized datasets and can cope with high dimensionality, which is useful for time series data. It has strengths such as working with technology and finance domains, which cover a broad range. Despite a drawback with small data size, our dataset is medium-sized, allowing us to leverage its efficient training time and scalability. Additionally, it supports the use of GPU and aligns with additional requirements such as low memory usage, making it a suitable choice for the given dataset's constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset involves a medium-sized time series with low memory requirements. While none of the models specifically list time series as a strength, AutoEncoder is suitable for high dimensionality and is capable of handling noisy data. It has short training times and can be scalable to large datasets, which fits the medium data size characteristic. Despite not being optimized for low memory, it holds a better balance of required characteristics compared to other models, which have more critical weaknesses such as inefficiency with time series or low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is suitable for the dataset as it is capable of handling medium-sized datasets and offers strengths in dealing with time series data, which aligns with the dataset's time series nature. Despite its high memory usage, its other strengths like handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets make it more adept in comparison to other models on the list, given the requirement for low memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it supports high dimensional dataset types and works well with noisy data, which aligns with the given dataset type. It also offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which compensates for the medium data size. Despite its weakness with small data sizes, the dataset size here is medium which shouldn't be a significant issue. Additionally, although it has high memory usage as a weakness, the requirements didn't explicitly prohibit models with relatively high memory usage. This model does not have any listed weaknesses related to time series data, making it more suitable than the other options in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it can handle medium-sized datasets and time series applications efficiently, even though the dataset has a low memory requirement. While AutoEncoder is generally used in high memory scenarios, its adaptability and efficiency in time series data, combined with its good performance on medium-sized datasets, make it suitable compared to other models in this list that specifically list time series as a weakness." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is a medium-sized time series with a requirement for low memory usage. Despite the low memory requirement not aligning perfectly with AutoEncoder's strength in terms of memory and time series data handling, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets, along with its short training time, make it the most suitable choice given the constraints. Other models in the list have weaknesses directly conflicting with the key aspects of the dataset, such as issues with time series data or low memory performance." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized and requires low memory usage, which is a challenge for most models but not a direct disqualifier for AutoEncoder. AutoEncoder is well-suited for time series data and is capable of handling medium data sizes efficiently. It also supports GPU, which can help speed up processing time, addressing the time series requirement efficiently. Despite its weakness with small data sizes, this model can manage medium-sized datasets and supports short training times and high-dimensional data, making it the most suitable choice among the provided options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized time series datasets with low memory requirements. Although it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, this is less relevant to the given dataset. Its strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data alongside short training time make it a suitable candidate, considering low memory constraints. The absence of significant weaknesses related to time series data makes it the best available option given the context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is the most suitable model given the dataset's requirements. Even though the dataset is time series, the model performs well with high dimensional data and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with 'medium' data size. Importantly, Deep SVDD does not have a specific memory constraint, making it appropriate for low-memory scenarios. The dataset does not present noisy or imbalanced data, which are weaknesses of Deep SVDD. Thus, it is the best fit among the provided options, given the dataset's characteristics and additional low memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the best choice based on the provided dataset characteristics. Although the dataset is tagged as time series, which is not a specific strength of AutoEncoder, it is suited for medium-sized datasets and can handle high dimensional and noisy data effectively, both of which are common in time series analysis. It also supports scalability to large datasets, uses GPUs efficiently (which is preferable for low memory usage), and has short training times. Despite its weakness in handling imbalanced and real-time data, these are not given requirements, making it more compatible with the low memory constraint compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is suitable for medium-sized datasets and provides support for time series through high dimensionality capabilities. It performs well with noisy data and is capable of short training times, which is beneficial for low memory requirements. Although it has weaknesses with small data sizes, this dataset is medium-sized, which should be adequate. AutoEncoder's capability for high-dimensional data and scalability to large datasets matches the dataset's properties better than the other alternatives, which have specific weaknesses with time series or are not optimized for low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is chosen because it supports medium-sized datasets well, handles high dimensionality and noisy data which could be present in time series data. It also has the advantage of a short training time and scalability to large datasets. Although it has a few weaknesses, such as not being specifically strong for time series and requiring high memory, given the dataset's requirement of low memory, other options from the model list exhibit more severe weaknesses with time series data, making AutoEncoder the best compromise considering the given dataset properties and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is a medium-sized time series with low memory requirements. Among the available models, the AutoEncoder is the most suitable due to its ability to handle high dimensionality and noisy data, which is typical in time series. Despite its weakness with small data sizes, the medium data size here is sufficient, and its strength in being scalable to large datasets ensures it can handle the medium data size efficiently. Other models either have weaknesses in handling time series data or require high memory, making AutoEncoder the best compromise given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is chosen as it is well-suited for medium-sized datasets and can handle high dimensionality, which can be relevant for time series data. It has strengths in scalable datasets and a short training time, which is beneficial when considering low memory constraints. Although time series isn't explicitly mentioned as its strength, it generally performs reasonably well on diverse types of data, including time-series. Its weaknesses such as small data size and imbalanced data do not apply to the current dataset, making it the most suitable choice from the list." + } + ], + "optdigits": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is most suitable due to its strengths in handling images, technology, high dimensionality, and its capability to leverage GPU effectively. It is well-suited for datasets requiring high memory and supports short training time, addressing the additional requirements perfectly. While VAE does have some weaknesses with imbalanced and categorical data, these aspects are not highlighted in the dataset tags, making VAE a robust choice overall for the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the task as it caters to images, supports high-dimensional data, and leverages GPU capabilities, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is known for handling large datasets efficiently with high memory requirements, making it ideal for the educational and technological domain. Although AnoGAN and AutoEncoder also handle images well, VAE stands out due to its compatibility with the education domain, high memory usage, and ability to manage high dimensionality combined with short training times." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It excels with images and high-dimensional data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it supports GPU and high memory usage, which are required for this task. It has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it suitable for a medium-sized data set in education and technology domains." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice for the given dataset tags, as it has strengths in handling image data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it supports GPU and high memory requirements, making it suitable for the dataset's additional requirements. The model's strengths in education and technology domains further align with the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the optimal choice as it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It supports image data, high dimensionality, and is well-suited for the technology and education domains. Moreover, VAE benefits from GPU acceleration, handles high memory requirements effectively, and trains on medium data sizes efficiently. Its ability to scale to large datasets and deal with noisy data further complements the dataset's attributes." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is highly suited for this dataset because it handles images and high-dimensional data effectively, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is also compatible with the requirements of GPU usage and high memory, allowing for efficient processing and training time. Moreover, its ability to handle noisy data and be scalable to large datasets makes it a robust choice for the educational and technology domain context provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the best choice because it is well-suited for image data with high dimensionality, aligning perfectly with the dataset's characteristics. It supports GPU and high memory environments, which are additional requirements of the dataset. Furthermore, VAE is efficient with large datasets and has a short training time, addressing potential computational constraints. Its strengths in handling image data in educational and technological contexts make it an ideal fit for the given domain." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, technology and education domains, and GPU usage. It requires high memory and offers short training time, which aligns well with the additional requirements of the dataset. Unlike some other models, it doesn't have notable weaknesses towards image data or high dimensionality, making it the best fit from the provided options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is highly suitable for the dataset due to its strengths in handling image data and high dimensionality, which fits with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it operates well with technology and education domains. The requirements for GPU and high memory are also perfectly matched by VAE's capabilities. Moreover, VAE has short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it a strong fit for the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is highly suitable for this dataset due to its strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and its applicability to the technology and education domains. It supports GPU acceleration, which is ideal for high memory requirements. Additionally, it has a short training time and can handle large datasets effectively, aligning well with the medium-sized, high-memory image dataset tags provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is a highly suitable choice given the dataset properties and model characteristics. The dataset consists of images, is of medium size, and has high dimensionality, which aligns well with VAE's strengths. The VAE is well-suited for image datasets and can handle high-dimensionality with the use of GPUs and high memory, meeting the dataset's additional requirements. Its capability for short training times and scalability to large datasets further makes it an optimal choice, as other models could present longer training times or are not scalable. VAE also aligns with the application domains of education and technology." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is centered around medium-sized image data with high dimensionality, found in the education and technology domains. VAE is well-suited for these characteristics as it excels at handling images, high dimensionality, and is effective in the technology and education domains. Moreover, VAE supports GPU and requires high memory, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, it has the advantage of short training time, which can be beneficial for handling a medium-sized dataset efficiently." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It strengths align well with the requirements: it is strong in handling images, which is key since the data type is images. It handles high dimensionality well, a critical characteristic of the dataset. It supports the education and technology domains relevant to the dataset. VAE requires high memory and makes efficient use of a GPU, both of which are listed additional requirements. Additionally, it can manage noisy data and scales to large datasets, meeting more of the dataset's needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is highly suitable for the given dataset properties as it handles images effectively, leverages high dimensionality, and requires GPU and high memory, which aligns with the dataset requirements. Additionally, VAE is effective in domains like technology and education, and it supports large datasets with a short training time, making it the most fitting choice compared to other models, which have greater weaknesses in these areas." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which align with the dataset properties. It also supports GPU and high memory requirements, making it capable of efficiently processing medium-sized datasets with high dimensionality in the education and technology domains. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model fits well with the dataset properties as it is suited for image data with high dimensionality, which is a crucial requirement for the given dataset. It also supports GPU processing and can handle high memory demands, ensuring efficient processing of medium-sized datasets. Furthermore, VAE is scalable to large datasets and requires only short training time, making it a practical choice for technology and education domains. Other model options failed to meet some of these critical requirements, such as support for GPU and high memory or suitability for image data with high dimensionality." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model is the most suitable choice for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling images, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It is also well-suited for high dimensionality and works effectively in technological and educational domains, as reflected in the dataset tags. VAE supports GPU usage and high memory requirements, which are also specified dataset needs. Additionally, its ability to handle noisy data and large datasets makes it an ideal fit given the dataset's high dimensionality and medium size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well suited for the dataset as it effectively handles images and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of this dataset. It is also compatible with technology and education domains, aligning with the dataset's domain tags. Additionally, VAE can handle noisy data, utilizes GPU, supports high memory requirements, has a short training time, and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset's additional requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is the best choice for this dataset because it specifically handles images with high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset properties. It is suitable for educational and technological domains, supports GPU, and is effective with high memory settings. VAEs also provide short training times and are scalable to large datasets, matching the dataset's characteristics and requirements. Despite its limitations with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced datasets, these do not apply significantly here, making it a suitable model for this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is highly suitable for the dataset due to its strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, the technology domain, and educational domains, which align well with the dataset tags. It also supports GPU and high memory requirements, both of which are necessary given the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, VAE offers short training times on large datasets, which is advantageous for efficient model development in medium-sized image datasets. Although it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced datasets, these are not primary concerns according to the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It is proficient with images and high dimensionality, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. Furthermore, it supports GPU acceleration and high memory, addressing the additional requirements. VAE also demonstrates strengths in the domains of education and technology, making it particularly fit for this dataset. Its capabilities with large datasets and short training times offer additional advantages, making VAE the most suitable model from the provided list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is best suited for the given dataset properties as it excels at handling image data with high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, AutoEncoder is GPU compatible, supports high memory usage, and has a short training time, making it efficient for medium-sized datasets. Its scalability to large datasets and ability to manage noisy data further complement the dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is selected as it aligns well with the dataset properties. The dataset characteristics include medium-sized image data with high dimensionality, a requirement for GPU, and high memory. VAE specifically excels in handling images, high dimensionality, and operates efficiently with GPU and high memory environments. It also has a short training time, which is advantageous. Additionally, it fits well within the education and technology domain specified in the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling images with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset properties. VAE supports technology and education domains, aligns well with the requirement for GPU and high memory, and can process noisy data efficiently. Furthermore, it offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets, meeting all the additional dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the best choice for this dataset because it is well-suited for images with high dimensionality and it benefits from GPU and high memory usage, which matches the dataset requirements. It is scalable to large datasets, and although there are some weaknesses related to small data sizes and imbalanced data, these are not as critical given the dataset's medium size and lack of mention of imbalance. Additionally, the short training time is advantageous for practical deployment." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset as it aligns well with the dataset properties and requirements. The dataset is described as having medium size and involves images with high dimensionality, which VAE can handle effectively due to its strengths in images and high dimensionality. Additionally, it supports GPU processing and high memory usage, which matches the additional requirements of the dataset. VAE's robustness against noisy data and its adaptability to large datasets make it an ideal choice for the educational and technological domain specified." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It is suitable for medium-sized datasets with high dimensionality and image data, which are the main features of the dataset. VAE performs well with high memory and GPU resources available, as required by the dataset. Additionally, it supports technology and education domains, making it a good fit for this task. Its strengths in handling large datasets and short training time further enhance its suitability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is particularly well-suited for the given dataset because it is strong in handling images with high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It also supports high memory and leverages GPUs effectively, which is necessary since a GPU and high memory are additional requirements. Though VAE has weaknesses with imbalanced, sparse, or categorical data, none of these are specified as issues with the dataset. Additionally, the education and technology domains of the dataset align well with VAE's strengths." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset because it excels with image data, which matches the data type. It handles high dimensionality well, a key characteristic of this dataset. Additionally, VAE benefits from a GPU and high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. Its strengths in education and technology domains make it a good fit for the dataset's domain. Moreover, VAE has a short training time and can scale to large datasets, addressing the medium data size effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model because it effectively handles the high dimensionality and image data present in the dataset. Given the 'medium' data size and requirements for GPU and high memory, VAE is well-equipped with strengths in images, high dimensionality, GPU capability, and high memory. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which aligns well with the dataset properties and additional requirements tagged." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice as it aligns well with the dataset properties. It excels in handling image data, supports high dimensionality, and fits the domain of education and technology. Additionally, it leverages GPU and high memory requirements effectively while offering short training times for medium-sized datasets. Despite the challenges with discrete or categorical data, these are not explicit concerns in the given dataset attributes, making VAE a strong candidate." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for a medium-sized dataset consisting of images with high dimensionality in the education and technology domain. The model's strengths align well with the dataset's characteristics, as it is specifically strong in handling image data, high dimensionality, and can utilize GPU and high memory effectively. Additionally, VAE has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it versatile for the given requirements. Despite its weaknesses in handling discrete or imbalanced data, these do not apply in this context, making VAE an optimal choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the best choice as it is well-suited for image data, aligns with the educational and technology domain, handles high dimensionality, and is capable of leveraging GPU and high memory resources. It also has short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which fits the medium-sized dataset requirement. Although it struggles with imbalanced and sparse data, these issues are not highlighted as critical dataset tags, making VAE the most compatible option based on strengths." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model is the most suitable choice for the provided dataset characteristics. The dataset includes medium-sized image data with high dimensionality, falling under the education and technology domains, and requiring GPU and high memory resources. VAE is strong with images, high dimensionality, and education/technology domains, while also being optimized for use with GPUs and high memory. It has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. These align well with the dataset requirements, making it the best fit compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the best choice for the given dataset because it is particularly strong at handling images and high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, VAE supports GPU and high memory requirements and has been noted for its capability to handle large datasets within the technology and education domains. Its short training time is an added advantage for efficient processing." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, consists of images, and has high dimensionality, which aligns well with VAE's strengths. VAE is well-suited for dealing with images, high dimensionality, and education and technology domains. It supports GPU and high memory, which meets the dataset's additional requirements. It also handles noisy data and has a short training time, making it a strong candidate considering the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for image data with high dimensionality, as indicated in the dataset properties. It supports GPU use and high memory, which are additional requirements for this dataset. The VAE model also has strengths in both the education and technology domains, which match the dataset domain. It handles noisy data appropriately and is scalable to large datasets, matching the dataset's medium size. It has a short training time, which is beneficial for efficient model development." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it aligns well with the dataset properties: working effectively with images and handling high dimensionality. It requires GPU and high memory, which matches the additional requirements. Moreover, it has the capability for short training times and can manage large datasets. Although it struggles with discrete data and imbalanced datasets, these weaknesses are not relevant given the dataset characteristics, making VAE an apt selection for educational and technological image data analysis." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties which include images, high dimensionality, and the requirement for high memory and GPU capabilities. VAE's strengths align well with these properties, as it is particularly strong with images, handles high dimensionality effectively, and is optimized for GPUs with high memory. Additionally, VAE provides short training time and works well with large datasets, making it an ideal choice for a medium data size in the educational technology domain." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset as it has strengths in handling image data, high dimensionality, and is compatible with GPU usage. It is particularly strong in the domains of technology and education, which match the dataset's domain tags. Furthermore, VAE can manage high memory requirements and offers short training time, making it ideal given the high memory need and medium data size. Although it has weaknesses with certain types of data, these do not conflict with the properties of the provided dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is highly suitable for the given dataset properties because it is specifically strong in handling images with high dimensionality, which aligns with the 'images' and 'high dimensionality' tags of the dataset. VAE also supports GPU and high memory usage, matching the additional requirements. Moreover, it aligns well with the educational and technological domains. Despite its weaknesses, the VAE remains efficient for the dataset size indicated as 'medium' and does not suffer significantly from issues with the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model as it is strong in handling images with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it is designed for use with GPU and high memory, meeting the additional requirements, and is well-suited for technology and education domains. Compared to other models, VAE has the advantage of short training times, handling large datasets, and dealing with noisy data, making it an optimal choice given the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a strong candidate for the given dataset because it handles images, high dimensionality, and noisy data effectively. It is compatible with GPU usage and high memory requirements, which aligns with the additional dataset needs. Furthermore, its strengths in technology and education domains, along with a short training time on large datasets, make it an excellent choice for the provided dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it is strong in handling images, which matches the data type of the dataset. It also effectively handles high dimensionality and can leverage a GPU and high memory, addressing the dataset's additional requirements. Furthermore, VAE is well-suited for educational and technology domains, aligns with the dataset's mentioned domains, and supports short training times, which could be beneficial depending on implementation constraints. While some weaknesses exist in terms of discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, for this dataset's tags, VAE\u2019s strengths are the best match." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational AutoEncoder) model is best suited for the dataset as it effectively handles high-dimensional image data, which aligns with the dataset's properties of 'images', 'high dimensionality', and 'technology'. VAE is also known for its strengths in the education domain and supports the additional requirements of using a GPU and high memory capacity. It offers a short training time, which is beneficial given the dataset's medium size and requirement for high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable for this dataset because it is specifically strong in processing images and handling high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's high dimensionality and image-type characteristics. It also supports GPU and requires high memory, which fits the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, AutoEncoder can manage large datasets efficiently with relatively short training times. It provides a balance between the dataset's medium size and the educational and technology domains, making it a versatile choice for various image processing tasks in these fields." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is well-suited for high dimensional image data, which is the type of data in the dataset. It operates efficiently on GPUs and requires high memory, matching the additional requirements for model performance in high-dimensional spaces. VAE offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which addresses the medium data size needs. Additionally, VAE is applicable to the education and technology domain, making it a strong fit for this application." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset involves images with high dimensionality and requires a model that can utilize GPUs and handle high memory. The AutoEncoder is well-suited for this dataset as it has strengths in handling images, high dimensionality, and utilizing GPU and high memory resources. Additionally, it offers short training times and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's medium size and education and technology domains. Despite its weaknesses, such as handling small datasets and imbalanced data, these are not critical for the given dataset's properties. Therefore, AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is best suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling images and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is capable of using GPU and accommodating high memory needs, as required by the dataset properties. Moreover, it has a short training time and can scale to large datasets, aligning well with the 'medium' data size described. These attributes make AutoEncoder the optimal choice over other models, which may have specific weaknesses, such as in handling noisy data, imbalanced data, or scalability issues." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is highly suitable for the dataset as it excels with image data, which is the type of data in this case. It supports high-dimensionality and technology domains, both of which are relevant to the dataset. The model also requires a GPU and high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. VAE additionally offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which are beneficial given the medium data size." + } + ], + "satellite": [ + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for the given dataset characteristics as it effectively handles high dimensionality and tabular data, two key aspects of the dataset tags. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's large size requirement. Despite its weakness on CPU usage, its strength in short training time and capability to manage high dimensionality and sparse data make it a strong candidate for agricultural domain data, ensuring efficient processing given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected because it handles tabular data and high dimensionality effectively, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which is crucial given the dataset's large size. While there is a weakness noted for CPU use, the model's strengths in handling large datasets, high dimensionality, and tabular data make it the most suitable choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset properties. It is scalable to large datasets and supports high dimensionality, which is crucial for this task. The weaknesses related to CPU do not significantly outweigh the advantages for handling large datasets on CPUs since it has short training times and is highly suitable for the data characteristics mentioned." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for the dataset's characteristics, including 'large' data size, 'tabular data' type, 'high dimensionality', and requirement for scalability on CPU resources. It is capable of handling high dimensionality and tabular data effectively. Although it has a weakness with CPU as an additional requirement, it balances this by offering 'short training time' and 'scalability to large datasets', making it a good fit overall, given the dataset's requirements and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset's characteristics. It excels in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset tags. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and offers a short training time, which fits the large data size requirement. While AE1SVM has weaknesses related to CPU utilization, its ability to handle high dimensional tabular data and scalability outweighs this limitation in the context of the provided dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice based on the dataset properties. It handles tabular data well and efficiently deals with high dimensionality, making it apt for large datasets. It also has a short training time and scales well to large datasets, which is beneficial when dealing with high-dimensional, large-scale data. Despite its weakness in CPU utilization, its strengths outweigh other models for the given dataset characteristics, particularly in high dimensionality and scalability for large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it is well-suited for high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset tags. It is also scalable to large datasets using CPU, and can handle the characteristics of the dataset effectively. Although there are some weaknesses regarding noisy data, the other models either are not well-matched to the dataset type or are less suitable for CPU-based computations." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is chosen because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. It is also scalable to large datasets, which is appropriate for the large data size tag. While it has a weakness with CPU-based computation, its other strengths such as handling sparse and imbalanced data make it a suitable choice compared to other models in the list, particularly since the dataset is high-dimensional and tabular." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it is strong with tabular data and accommodates high dimensionality, matching the dataset's characteristics. It performs well with large datasets and high memory, and has a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's requirement for CPU utilization. While it does have a weakness with CPU usage, AutoEncoder's strengths align more closely with the dataset properties compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is selected because it is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. It can handle noisy data efficiently and is scalable to large datasets, despite requiring a CPU. Although it performs better with a GPU, it still is efficient with the support for high memory and short training time, making it a suitable choice for the given dataset context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the best choice because it can handle large, high-dimensional tabular datasets, which fits well with the dataset properties provided. Despite the additional CPU requirement noted in the dataset tags, AutoEncoder is preferred because its strengths include scalability to large datasets and suitability for high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the provided dataset. While AutoEncoder typically prefers GPU, its strength in tabular data and scaling ability makes it the most suitable option given the dataset specifics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it effectively handles high dimensionality, tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset properties. Although it performs better with a GPU, it can still handle CPU usage, unlike other models with more significant CPU weaknesses. While ALAD also handles high dimensionality and tabular data well, it is not suitable for CPU usage. AE1SVM's compatibility with tabular data and scalability make it the most suitable choice for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this task due to its strengths in handling large tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It also offers scalability to large datasets and short training time, which are beneficial for CPU-based implementations despite its general preference for GPU. While it might have weaknesses with CPU, the strengths align well with the dataset requirements compared to other models on the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, consists of tabular data, and has high dimensionality. While AutoEncoder requires a GPU for optimal performance, it is well-suited for handling high-dimensional tabular data, and it can efficiently scale to large datasets with a short training time, addressing the dataset's high dimensionality requirement. Despite its weakness with CPU-based implementations, the strengths of AutoEncoder in handling such dataset characteristics outweigh this downside in scenarios where a GPU can be made available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is most suitable for the given dataset because it handles high-dimensional tabular data efficiently and scales well to large datasets. It also features short training time and supports high memory with the use of a GPU, which aligns well with the requirement to cope with a large, high-dimensional CPU-compatible dataset. Although it has a weakness when CPU is required during training, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and large data sizes, especially in the tabular form, make it the best fit from the provided list of models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is best suited for the given dataset because it effectively handles high-dimensional and tabular data, aligns well with the dataset's large size, and is scalable to large datasets. Although it's best on GPU, its ability to tackle high-dimensionality and tabular data makes it a good choice when considering CPU constraints. Additionally, it is known for its short training time, catering well to the requirement of computational efficiency." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it supports large, high-dimensional tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which is critical given the dataset's 'large' size and 'high dimensionality' tags. Additionally, AutoEncoder handles noisy data well, making it a suitable choice for data in the agriculture domain. While not optimized for CPU, it compensates with short training time and scalability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice because it effectively handles tabular data with high dimensionality and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset properties. Additionally, it offers short training times leveraging GPU, which aligns well with the requirement to use CPU, as it can still perform without explicitly needing CPU-dependent models. Despite its weakness in CPU, its strengths in handling large, high-dimensional tabular data make it a preferable option over other models with more significant negatives for the given dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset consists of large tabular data with high dimensionality, and there is a requirement to run on a CPU. Among the models listed, the AutoEncoder is particularly suitable due to its strength in handling high dimensionality and tabular data. Although it mentions a weakness with running on CPUs, there are implementations that can leverage CPU performance effectively without requiring GPUs. Additionally, the AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets, which perfectly aligns with the dataset properties provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it is strong with tabular data and handles high dimensionality well, which aligns with the dataset properties. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which is crucial given the large data size. While it requires a GPU, its ability to manage high dimensionality and scalability outweighs the weakness regarding CPU usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the provided dataset properties. It supports tabular data and high dimensionality, both of which are central characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's large size. Although it has a weakness in CPU compatibility, its strength in handling tabular, high-dimensional data and scalability makes it the optimal choice among the available models for this agricultural dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, both of which are characteristics of the provided dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the 'large' data size tag. While the dataset requires a CPU implementation, and AutoEncoder is listed as having a weakness when used with CPUs, its overall alignment with other dataset properties like high dimensionality and scalability makes it the best choice from the given model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which matches the characteristics of the given dataset. It is known for handling noisy data effectively and has scalable abilities suitable for large datasets. Although it typically benefits from GPU, it can still perform acceptably given the high dimensionality capability. While other models like VAE also support high dimensional tabular data, AutoEncoder is more specifically tailored for scalable applications with short training times, making it a suitable choice under CPU constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the best choice because it supports high dimensionality and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets, and although it prefers GPU, it can still leverage high-dimensional data effectively with CPU constraints. Its strengths in short training time and scalability suit the given requirement, making it better suited compared to models like ALAD or AutoEncoder, which have CPU weaknesses, or VAE and other models with specific limitations in tabular data handling or scalability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is chosen because it handles tabular data well, is capable of processing high-dimensional data, and can scale to large datasets. It offers short training times and is designed for GPU usage, which suits the dataset's characteristics of large size and high dimensionality. Despite its weakness for CPU, its strengths align well with the dataset properties, making it the most suitable choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice because it supports tabular data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It also handles high dimensionality well, aligns with the dataset's large size, and is scalable to large datasets. While the requirement mentions CPU, AutoEncoder's ability to handle high memory and short training time can still be an advantage when balanced against other models which might not support tabular data or have long training times despite being scalable." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for the provided dataset characteristics. It excels with tabular data and high-dimensional data, which are key properties of the dataset in question. Furthermore, AutoEncoder can handle large datasets efficiently and has a short training time, making it feasible for CPU environments when memory is available. Despite its weakness in CPU usage, its strengths align well with other dataset requirements and domain emphasis on agriculture and scalability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality. The AutoEncoder model is suitable because it can handle high-dimensional, large datasets and is optimized for tabular data. While it prefers GPU, it can still be used effectively on a CPU for large datasets despite some weaknesses noted. Its strengths include high dimensionality, the ability to handle large datasets, and tabular data, making it the best fit from the list of options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it is effective with large, high-dimensional tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which meets the additional requirement of being efficient on a CPU. While it has a minor weakness with CPU use, the strengths align well with the dataset's needs, particularly in handling high-dimensional tabular data with the potential for noisy data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is a suitable choice because it handles tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset's data type. It is capable of processing high-dimensional data, aligns with the dataset's characteristic of high dimensionality, and is scalable to large datasets. Although it is generally optimized for GPU rather than CPU, none of the listed models specifically favor CPU processing, making it a compromise choice while addressing the other priority requirements like data type and dimension handling." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is a suitable choice given the dataset properties. It is well-suited for handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, AutoEncoder can work well with large datasets, leveraging its scalability and short training time. Although it is optimized for GPU usage, it aligns more closely with the dataset's requirements compared to other models, which exhibit CPU incompatibility or other characteristics misaligned with tabular data and high dimensionality." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is best suited for tabular data with high dimensionality and large data size, which matches the dataset characteristics. Despite being GPU-focused, it aligns well with the requirement of being scalable to large datasets. Its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data make it the most appropriate choice from the given models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the best choice for the given dataset properties as it supports tabular data and high dimensionality. It is scalable to large datasets and exhibits strengths in handling noisy data, which aligns with the characteristics of the dataset. Although one of its weaknesses is CPU compatibility, its other strengths outweigh this limitation, and it provides a short training time and efficient GPU utilization suitable for large agricultural datasets with high dimensionality." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality, which matches well with the strengths of AutoEncoder. It supports high dimensionality, tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets with a short training time. Although it performs better with a GPU, it can still be suitable given the CPU requirement. Its scalability and capability to handle high dimensionality make it the best choice among the provided models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, consists of tabular data, and has high dimensionality, all of which align perfectly with the strengths of AutoEncoder. AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets, works well with high-dimensional and tabular data, and has a short training time, which is advantageous for practical implementation. Additionally, while the dataset prefers CPU usage, AutoEncoder's strengths in other critical areas make it the best overall fit among the given options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is a suitable choice for this dataset because it supports tabular data and handles high dimensionality well, aligning with the dataset properties. It is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which is ideal given the requirement of using a CPU and managing large data efficiently. Although it has a weakness for CPU, this is typical for models of this type, but it does excel in other necessary areas for this agricultural tabular dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, handles high dimensionality efficiently, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset properties. It also offers quick training times on GPUs, which suits the additional requirement for CPU processing as it implies a preference for models that are not resource-intensive. Despite CPU not being a strength, the AutoEncoder's compatibility with large datasets and tabular data outweighs this drawback compared to other models that do not support tabular data as effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected as it handles tabular data well, supports high dimensionality, and is suitable for large datasets, which matches the dataset properties provided. Although it primarily requires GPU, its ability to process high dimensional and noisy data efficiently with a short training time makes it a strong candidate given the requirement for CPU resources and a large dataset size. The other models have either limitations with CPU usage or issues with tabular data that make them less suitable choices." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. It has strengths in handling noisy data and is scalable to large datasets, making it appropriate for the given 'large' data size. Although it typically prefers GPU, its capability with tabular data and short training time make it a strong fit given the requirement of working with CPU eventually." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it effectively handles tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which is suitable given the 'large' dataset size. Although it prefers GPU, its strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality outweigh its CPU weakness in this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It also performs well on large datasets and is scalable, which is necessary given the large data size. While it has weaknesses related to CPU usage, its strengths align more closely with the dataset properties compared to other models on the list, especially given the need for handling high dimensionality data efficiently." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset consists of large tabular data with high dimensionality which is suitable for an AutoEncoder. AutoEncoder's strengths include handling tabular data and high dimensionality, and it's scalable to large datasets which aligns well with the dataset's large size. While one of its weaknesses is CPU, the dataset's requirement for CPU is an issue; however, given the other constraints and strengths, it provides a reasonable balance given the other model options available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it excels in handling large, high-dimensional datasets and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also performs well with noisy data, a potential concern in agriculture-related data, and can efficiently run on large datasets. Although it typically requires a GPU for optimal performance, these strengths outweigh its CPU limitation, making it the best choice among the available models for the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is best suited because it supports tabular, high-dimensional data, which aligns with the dataset's high dimensionality characteristic. It also handles noisy data well, despite the negative on CPU optimization. It is scalable to large datasets, which is crucial for the large data size requirement. Additionally, it offers a short training time, making it practical given the computational constraints associated with CPU usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The AE1SVM model is suitable for the dataset because it effectively handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it scales well to large datasets, which aligns with the large data size tag. While it has weaknesses related to CPU usage, it does not mention it being unusable on CPUs, making it a feasible choice among the options provided. Other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, ALAD, and AutoEncoder either underperform on tabular data or have a higher affinity for GPU processing, which is less compatible with the requirement for CPU use." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, high-dimensional, tabular, and requires CPU compatibility. The AutoEncoder model strongly handles high-dimensional and tabular data, as well as scalable to large datasets, making it a suitable option. Although AutoEncoder has weaknesses with CPU requirements, its strengths in handling the dataset's other characteristics make it the most suitable choice among the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for the dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and scalability to large datasets, which are key attributes of the dataset. Additionally, it offers short training times and can process noisy data efficiently, making it a good fit for the agricultural domain. While its weakness includes needing a CPU, no specific CPU requirement heavily impacts its computational strengths on large datasets in this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected as it caters to the dataset's properties of being large, tabular, and high dimensional. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets with short training time. Despite its requirement for GPU, it aligns well with the dataset's high dimensionality and agriculture domain, making it a suitable choice for the given constraints and strengths needed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it is strong in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is also scalable to large datasets, which is crucial given the large data size requirement. Although it has weaknesses in CPU usage, its strengths in the relevant areas make it the most suitable choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data exceptionally well, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets and can efficiently utilize high memory, both of which are crucial given the large data size and high dimensionality. Despite its weakness in CPU usage, compared to the other models, it also performs adequately with conditions favoring GPU, thus offering a reasonable balance considering the variations in model capabilities." + } + ], + "lympho": [ + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it aligns well with the dataset characteristics and requirements. The dataset is medium-sized tabular data from the medical domain, characterized by low-signal data and requiring low memory and CPU compatibility. AE1SVM is strong in handling tabular and medical data, and it's compatible with high dimensionality and imbalanced data, which is beneficial given the low-signal nature of the dataset. Although it has a weakness in terms of CPU and low memory, it aligns more closely with the dataset requirements than other models, offering short training time and scalability to larger datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data and falls within the medical domain. It can handle medium-sized datasets effectively and is known for its short training time, which aligns with the requirement for low memory usage on a CPU. While VAE is generally better suited for GPU processing, its compatibility with tabular and healthcare data without being heavily reliant on noisy data makes it the best option given the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also functions effectively on low-dimensional datasets and processes sparse and imbalanced data well, which might align with the 'low-signal data' characteristic. Additionally, LUNAR offers scalability and requires short training time, meeting the low memory and CPU constraints. While it might be computationally intensive, the mentioned characteristics make it the best fit among the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is a suitable choice for the given dataset properties as it is strong with tabular data, is specialized in handling high dimensional data, and is applicable in the medical domain. Despite the dataset being low-signal and medium in size, AE1SVM can manage the medium data size effectively with short training times and scalability. It is weaker when it comes to low memory and CPU, but compared to other models, it aligns more closely with the needs, especially given its strengths in handling tabular and medical data, which is essential for the problem domain." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it specifically handles tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also supports medical domain data, which aligns with the dataset's domain. While it does generally require high memory, it is still the best fit among the models listed because its strengths align well with the dataset's characteristics such as dealing with tabular data effectively and having short training time. Additionally, although it is less ideal on CPU and low memory, it is relatively better suited for low-signal data compared to other options like VAE and AutoEncoder, which have weaknesses in handling low-signal data in CPU environments." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is a suitable choice for this dataset as it handles tabular data effectively, which aligns with the dataset's medium size and tabular data type. It also supports low-dimensional datasets, which benefits low-signal data. Although LUNAR is computationally intensive and sensitive to hyperparameters, it is CPU-friendly and suitable for low-memory conditions, meeting the additional requirements. Other models in the list either have weaknesses related to low-memory situations or don't adequately support tabular data under these constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is a suitable choice because it supports tabular data and is applied in healthcare domains, which matches the dataset's medical domain. Despite requiring a GPU for best performance, it suits medium-sized data and can handle low-memory constraints better than most competitors. VAE also has a short training time with capabilities for high dimensionality and limited noisy data; these characteristics help accommodate the low-signal data noted in the dataset. Its weaknesses such as requiring high memory and preference for GPU are less concerning with acceptable hardware adjustments. While CPU preference is noted, none of the models perfectly fit all criteria, and VAE aligns most closely with the critical dataset characteristics and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular medical data with low signal and low memory requirements. Among the models, AutoEncoder has strengths in tabular data, healthcare, and high-dimensional datasets, which suits the domain and data type well. Although it's typically better suited to GPUs and may prefer higher memory, it has a short training time and can scale to large datasets, making it adaptable to medium-sized data on CPUs with optimized settings." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected for the medical domain with tabular data and its particular suitability for handling imbalanced data and sparse data. Despite AE1SVM's requirement for GPU, which conflicts with the CPU tag in dataset requirements, it overall aligns better with medium data size and tabular data characteristic. Although AE1SVM requires high memory and is weak for CPU use, its strength in medical and tabular data fields outweighs other models, like AutoEncoder or VAE, which are weak with CPU usage and low-signal data. This model also features short training time and good scalability, which supports use in medium-sized datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and in the medical domain, with additional requirements for CPU usage and low memory. VAE supports tabular data, healthcare applications, and can handle high dimensionality, which is beneficial given the medical domain context. While VAE typically prefers GPU and high memory, its strengths align more closely with the dataset's characteristics compared to other models. Furthermore, VAE can work with short training times which may help with the low memory requirement, making it a better option for this dataset than alternatives like AutoEncoder or Deep SVDD, which have noted weaknesses in low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for tabular data and medical domains which align with the dataset characteristics. It handles medium-sized data well and supports tabular datasets, which fits the requirement of the dataset properties. Additionally, it does well with high dimensionality, which can be associated with tabular medical data. Although it typically prefers GPU and high memory, it remains one of the few options accommodating tabular data in a medical context from the model list, despite some challenges with CPU and low memory efficiency." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational AutoEncoder) is the most suitable model for this dataset as it supports tabular data and has strengths in the medical domain. Although it generally requires high memory and prefers a GPU, it can handle low memory scenarios with optimized configurations. Additionally, it offers short training times making it feasible for medium-sized datasets. Despite its weakness in CPU deployment, its ability to adapt to tabular data and suitability for healthcare domains makes it a good fit for the dataset's properties while aligning with the model's strengths in handling tabular and healthcare data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it handles tabular data well, which matches the dataset type. It also has strengths in the medical domain, which is relevant, and can deal with high dimensionality. Despite its weaknesses in terms of CPU and low memory, it offers scalable solutions for medium-sized datasets with a potentially low signal. While not the absolute perfect fit, it's the best choice considering the available models and the given dataset requirements for working on a CPU system with low memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and medical, which aligns well with AE1SVM's strengths in handling tabular data and medical domains. Although it requires high memory, which was not preferred, it operates well with CPU, which satisfies the additional requirement. The model is also capable of dealing with high dimensionality and sparse data, making it a strong candidate considering the characteristics of low-signal data. Overall, AE1SVM meets more of the requirements and conditions than the other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It is suitable for healthcare applications present in the medical domain tag. Although it favors GPU and high memory, VAE is often more versatile and can be adapted for CPU with careful optimizations. Importantly, VAE's strengths in handling tabular data and healthcare overshadow its limitations regarding low-signal data. Other models, such as AE1SVM and ALAD, were not ideal due to their weaknesses in CPU optimization, which is a requirement here. Despite VAE's weaknesses in CPU optimization, its strengths align more closely with the dataset properties compared to other options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data and is also suitable for healthcare-related datasets, aligning with the medical domain of the dataset. Although it generally prefers GPU and high memory, it is more suitable than the alternatives given the constraints of using a CPU and low memory. Other models either lack support for tabular data, have significant weaknesses in low-signal data, or require resources not aligned with CPU preference." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is most suitable given the dataset properties. It supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. AutoEncoder also excels in handling medium-sized datasets, has medical domain expertise, short training time, and can deal with low-signal data. Although it prefers a GPU environment, the requirement for low memory can be managed by adjusting the model's size or using a CPU at the cost of increased training time." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it supports tabular data and is relevant in the medical domain, which aligns with the characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it works well with high dimensionality and can handle imbalanced data effectively. Although AE1SVM typically requires high memory and GPU, its ability to manage tabular data and the domain suitability make it the best choice. The requirement to run it on CPU and low memory is a weakness, but given the options, it offers the best compromise considering the low-signal nature of the dataset compared to the other models available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular data with applications in healthcare, and is effective even with low-signal datasets. While it has strengths related to GPU use, its short training time aligns with low memory requirements if the training data is efficiently batched. While it is typically favorable for high-dimensionality datasets, it is generally suited for tabular medical data when signal strength is low, contrasting with other models that either have high memory demands or are tailored primarily for noisy data or data types not tied to this dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and is used in healthcare domains, matching the dataset's medical domain and tabular data type characteristics. It also has a short training time and can be efficient with high dimensionality, suitable for low-signal data tasks. Although it is generally suited for GPU, with medium data size and a need for efficiency on CPU and low memory, VAE is closer to meeting the overall requirements compared to other models that have higher memory and CPU usage issues." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is best suited for the dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and the medical domain, both of which are present in the dataset. It is capable of managing high dimensionality and maintains good performance with sparse and imbalanced data. Additionally, it uses GPUs efficiently but its consideration of high memory could be countered with efficient memory management. While it is not optimal for CPU or low memory settings, it aligns best with the needs for tabular and medical data within CPU constraints better than the other available models, given the strengths it brings in other critical areas." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected as the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type, and is applicable in the medical domain. It is adept at handling high dimensionality, which can be beneficial for medical datasets. Despite the model's weakness for low memory, it generally offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which aligns with the requirement for CPU usage and low memory. Additionally, its strengths in handling tabular data and medical data conform to the key attributes of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model, given the dataset characteristics and requirements. It effectively handles tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Despite its weaknesses in high memory and being computationally intensive, it has strengths in handling low-dimensional datasets and imbalanced data, which could complement the low-signal nature of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR supports CPU usage and does not demand high memory, aligning with the specified constraints. Its short training time and scalability to large datasets are additional advantages." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for medium-sized tabular data in the medical domain. It excels with high-dimensional, sparse, and imbalanced data, and is designed to work with CPU constraints. Despite the dataset's low-signal data characteristic, its ability to handle tabular data alongside its short training time makes it the optimal choice, especially when considering the requirement for low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is highly suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset's primary characteristic, and it also has strengths in healthcare. Despite being typically used with GPUs, VAE has an advantage in handling low-signal data effectively due to its ability to model complex relationships in the data. While it is typically paired with high memory, this model's ability to work well with medium-sized datasets and the absence of scalability constraints make it a suitable choice for the given low-memory requirement when balanced with careful resource management." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the data type of this dataset. It is also strong in the medical domain, which corresponds to the dataset's domain. Although it requires high memory, it is suitable for medium-sized datasets and has short training time, compensating for CPU and low memory limitations. Other models like AnoGAN and DevNet are limited by their unfavorable interactions with tabular data and low-signal data, respectively. Further, AE1SVM's capability to handle sparse and imbalanced data adds an advantage, despite potential issues with small data size, making it the best fit from the list provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it handles tabular data and is suitable for the medical domain, as specified in the dataset characteristics. Although it has a weakness concerning small data size and CPU usage, it does work well with tabular and medical datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. Despite its high memory requirement, it provides a balance between the needs of handling imbalanced and sparse data and also offers relatively fast training time compared to others, ideal for medium-sized datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is chosen because it specifically supports tabular data, which fits the dataset type. It is also suitable for medical domain data and handles high dimensionality well, addressing the dataset's characteristics of being in the medical field and potentially having a complex feature space. Although AE1SVM typically utilizes GPU, it can be adapted for CPU usage due to its short training time; however, memory limitations could be improved with appropriate preprocessing or feature selection. Importantly, it supports low-signal data compared to some other models in the list, making it a good candidate for the given dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset as it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics of medium size and tabular data type. It shows strengths in handling tabular data, imbalanced data, and medical domain requirements, which are important given the dataset is medical-related with low-signal characteristics. Although it has a weakness with low memory, amongst the available models, it has fewer weaknesses directly conflicting with the requirements of 'CPU' and 'low memory'. Additionally, it can handle high dimensionality, which might be a factor in the dataset given its medical nature. Despite this, its short training time and scalability make it a better choice when using limited memory resources on a CPU as compared to other models with overlapping weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset's properties. It is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Despite its higher memory requirements, it is effective for medical data and tabular data while being capable of handling high-dimensional datasets, which is beneficial given the medium data size and low-signal characteristics. Although not optimal for low memory and CPU, it still strikes a better balance with the given constraints compared to the other models, which have more significant weaknesses related to key dataset features or requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, works well in the medical domain, and handles medium-sized datasets efficiently. Although it requires high memory and is optimized for GPU, it has a short training time which is beneficial considering the dataset's CPU and low memory constraints. It effectively addresses sparse and imbalanced data, making it a good fit for low-signal characteristics without significantly impacting performance." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which is a critical characteristic of the dataset. The VAE model also aligns with the domain requirements as it has proven strengths in healthcare, making it appropriate for the medical domain of this dataset. Although VAE typically requires a GPU and high memory, its short training time and scalability to large datasets fit well within medium-sized data constraints. Despite its weakness in CPU environments, its proficiency in handling tabular data and medical domain data makes it the most suitable choice from the provided model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets, particularly in the medical domain, which matches the dataset's characteristics. While it faces challenges with small data sizes and CPU requirements, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets make it the most compatible option for the dataset properties provided. Additionally, it performs well with sparse and imbalanced data, making it versatile for various medical data patterns." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it supports tabular data and is applicable in the medical domain, both of which are key characteristics of the dataset. Despite the requirement for low memory, AE1SVM's strengths include high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets, which can counterbalance memory limitations as it does not specify requiring GPU or high memory in the dataset tags. Additionally, it has a short training time, aligning well with the CPU-driven requirement. It can handle imbalanced and sparse data, which may be present in medical datasets, even though it is not explicitly low-signal data oriented." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is specifically noted for its strengths in healthcare applications and can handle high dimensionality and noisy data. Although VAE prefers a GPU and high memory, it has a short training time, making it feasible for use with medium-sized datasets using CPU. The key strengths match the dataset's properties in the medical domain while handling low-signal data effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is chosen because it supports tabular data and is strong in the medical domain. It handles imbalanced data and is suited for high-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset's low-signal characteristic. Despite its weakness with small data size, AE1SVM can manage medium-sized datasets and efficiently run on CPUs, which is necessary given the constraints of low memory and CPU usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset indicates medium-sized, low-signal, tabular medical data with CPU and low memory requirements. LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and performs well on low-dimensional datasets and sparse data. It also offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's medium size and computational constraints, even though it primarily benefits from a GPU. Therefore, LUNAR strikes a balance between the dataset properties and the strengths of available models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset characteristics. It handles tabular data and is specifically strong in the medical domain, which matches the dataset's domain. Although AE1SVM has some weaknesses related to CPU usage and low memory conditions, it can effectively handle medium-sized datasets and tabular data, which are critical factors for this selection. Other models, like VAE and AutoEncoder, have strengths in similar domains but have weaknesses regarding CPU usage, which makes AE1SVM a more balanced choice given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is best suited for this task because it demonstrates strengths in handling tabular data within the medical domain, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Even though AE1SVM generally requires high memory, it accommodates tabular data and has short training times, both reinforcing its suitability given the medium data size and the need for CPU compatibility. The model also supports high dimensionality, which could be advantageous for capturing complex patterns within the low-signal data, albeit on a CPU, making it the most compatible option compared to others on the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it caters to the characteristics of medium-sized and tabular medical datasets well, despite the low-signal nature. It is explicitly designed for tabular data and excels in the medical domain. While it generally requires high memory, its strengths in handling tabular and imbalanced data, relevant to the medical domain, makes it a suitable choice, despite some memory constraints. Moreover, its short training time fits the requirement for a model that can be efficiently run on a CPU, considering additional CPU and low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is a good fit for medium-sized tabular data in the medical domain, matching the dataset characteristics. Despite a low-signal data weakness, it excels in high dimensionality, tabular, and medical data, utilizes CPU efficiently, and accommodates low memory usage. Although it prefers high memory and GPU, its strengths align better with the dataset compared to alternatives, providing a balanced trade-off." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset since it is capable of handling tabular data effectively and has strengths in the medical domain. Although it requires high memory and a GPU, which contradicts some requirements, it excels in short training time and scalability to large datasets, which can offset some low memory issues. Its capability to manage imbalanced and sparse data also makes it a good fit for the medium-sized medical dataset with low signal characteristics, aligning closely with the strengths needed for this type of data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset and requirements. The dataset is medium-sized and involves tabular data within the medical domain, which aligns well with the strengths of AutoEncoders. Although AutoEncoders typically require high memory, this consideration is less severe given the dataset's medium size. While they are generally not optimal for low-signal data, their compatibility with tabular data and healthcare, coupled with efficient processing on a GPU, makes them a viable choice. Additionally, the efficient model training time and scalability further support its selection despite CPU and low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It supports tabular data, which aligns with the data type, and can handle low-dimensional datasets, which is appropriate given the low-signal data characteristic. Additionally, it requires a CPU and offers short training time, which matches the additional requirements of low memory usage. Other models either do not fit the 'low memory' or 'CPU' requirement well or have larger weaknesses for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is a suitable choice for this dataset as it is well-suited for tabular data in the medical domain. It handles high dimensionality effectively, which is beneficial given the dataset characteristics. Although it is typically GPU-based, its short training time can offset CPU requirements to some extent. Among the available options, it is the most compatible choice given the model's balance of strengths and weaknesses with respect to the dataset's low-signal limitations and medium size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this use case because it handles tabular data and medical domain applications well, aligning with the dataset properties. It supports high dimensionality and can process medium-sized datasets, making it a good fit for low-signal data contexts. While it is sometimes CPU-bound and requires high memory, its advantages in handling tabular medical data overrule these concerns given the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a suitable choice for this medium-sized tabular medical dataset because it can handle tabular data, is applicable in healthcare, and manages high dimensionality. Additionally, VAE is proficient with noisy data and has short training times. Though the model generally prefers GPU, it can run on a CPU if execution time is not the primary concern. Despite its weaknesses with CPU and low memory, it aligns best with the primary dataset requirements compared to other models that either require GPU exclusively or struggle with low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and the medical domain, aligning with the dataset properties. Although it typically requires a GPU, VAE can handle the 'low-signal data' effectively due to its strengths in high dimensionality and noise-handling. While VAE usually leverages high memory, among the available options, it strikes a balance with the requirement for low memory usage. Other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, and AutoEncoder share more weaknesses in areas important to this dataset, such as handling tabular data or low memory. Additionally, VAE offers relatively short training times and scalability to larger datasets, which fits well with a medium-sized dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable due to its strengths in handling tabular data and its applicability in the medical domain. Although it requires high memory and typically uses a GPU, it is designed to work with high dimensional data, which can help in addressing the low-signal nature of the dataset. AE1SVM also handles sparse and imbalanced data well, which aligns with the dataset characteristics mentioned. While low memory is a requirement, the strengths of AE1SVM outweigh this weakness, making it a favorable choice given the context and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is best suited for tabular data and can handle low-dimensional datasets with sparse and imbalanced characteristics, aligning well with the dataset's properties. It is also scalable to large datasets, has short training time, and does not require high memory, which is ideal given the additional CPU and low memory requirements. Although LUNAR's weaknesses include noisy data and high memory, these are less of a concern given that the dataset is low-signal and medium-sized, focusing on the need for efficient management of computational resources." + } + ], + "ionosphere": [ + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It handles tabular data well, which matches the dataset type. It also has strengths in working with sparse and imbalanced data, which could be advantageous given the low-signal data characteristic. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time and scales to large datasets, which can help manage resource constraints such as low memory. Although LUNAR has high memory as a weakness, it still aligns better with the dataset tags compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset comprises small tabular low-signal data with a low memory constraint. Among the model list, VAE is most suited due to its strengths in handling tabular data and technology domain features, despite requiring high memory, which is a trade-off given that small data size may offset this requirement. VAE is noted for its adaptability to tabular and high-dimensional data, both relevant here, and offers a short training time that aligns with low-resource constraints better than other options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "Among the given models, VAE has strengths that align most closely with the dataset properties. It supports tabular data and is applicable in the technology domain. Additionally, VAE has a short training time, which is advantageous for small datasets. Although it generally requires high memory, other models have more significant weaknesses related to small data size or low memory requirements, making VAE the most suitable choice considering the trade-offs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and small datasets, which matches the dataset properties of being small and tabular in nature. It also provides the benefit of short training time and scalability to large datasets if needed, aligning with the low memory requirement. While it may have high memory weaknesses, other models either have more weaknesses or do not match the dataset's characteristics as well as LUNAR. It also does not have the weakness of 'low-signal data' like other models, making it a more viable option given the current dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It specifically handles tabular data well and performs efficiently with low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the 'small' data size tag. Despite its high memory weakness, LUNAR's strengths in tabular data, imbalanced data management, and short training time make it preferable for low-signal data requiring low memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for this scenario as it supports tabular data, performs well in the technology domain, and is efficient with high dimensional and noisy data despite its high memory requirement. While it is generally more effective with larger datasets, its strengths align better with the given dataset properties (small tabular data, technology domain) than the other models, which have greater weaknesses such as poor performance on tabular data or small datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset's characteristics. It has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and works well with low-dimensional datasets, aligning with the small data size tag. It also meets the additional requirement of low memory usage with its short training time, despite having a general weakness of high memory. It doesn't have weaknesses directly conflicting with low-signal data, unlike other models, making it a more balanced choice overall." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags. It also has strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data without requiring high memory, fitting the additional requirement of low memory. Additionally, LUNAR has short training times, making it efficient for small datasets. Despite its weaknesses like sensitivity to hyperparameters, it doesn't conflict significantly with the dataset characteristics given." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for small tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags indicating a 'small' data size and 'tabular data'. LUNAR also benefits from short training times, which aligns with the 'low memory' requirement. Although LUNAR has high memory as a weakness, its strengths in managing tabular and low-dimensional data make it more suitable than other options given the constraints on the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data and technology domains. It can handle high-dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite its weakness for small data size and low-signal data, it has strengths in short training time and scalability, making it appropriate even for small datasets. This model, although not perfect given the low-signal and small size context, provides a reasonable balance of strengths that fit the given constraints better than others in this list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is small sized, tabular, technology-focused, and low-signal, with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is suitable for tabular and technology datasets, and offers short training times. Although VAE typically requires high memory, its strengths in handling noisy data and high dimensionality align well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its higher memory requirement, it is the best match among the available models given its strengths in relevant data types and domain, and its capability to work well even when the signal is low." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model when considering the given dataset properties. It is strong with tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type, and although it isn't specified for small data sets, its ability to handle low-dimensional datasets and short training time makes it a viable candidate given the low memory requirement. Moreover, while other models struggle with the small data size characteristic of the dataset, LUNAR doesn't explicitly list this as a weakness. It avoids the weaknesses that align directly with the dataset properties and additional requirements, such as low memory and low signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, and imbalanced data, making it a good fit for the low-signal tabular data in the technology domain. Although it requires high memory, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's low memory requirement and small size constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it specifically lists tabular data as a strength aligning well with the dataset type. It also handles imbalanced data and does not have a weakness related to low memory, which addresses the additional requirements. Although it has no specific strength for small datasets, its strengths in handling tabular and sparse data with short training time provide a balanced approach given the low-signal characteristic and the need to accommodate small data size indirectly." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and constraints. It is designed for tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and is specifically suited for low-dimensional datasets, aligning with the 'low-signal data' characteristic. Additionally, LUNAR has efficient memory usage which is vital given the 'low memory' requirement, and it has a short training time, allowing for rapid iterations on small datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for small tabular datasets and the technology domain, which matches the dataset properties. Despite its requirement for high memory, which might be a concern, it addresses the characteristics of low memory better than models like AutoEncoder and AE1SVM, which have weaknesses specifically in this area. VAE also handles tabular data well and has a short training time, making it a suitable choice given the dataset's additional low memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice because it handles tabular data effectively, aligns with technological domains, and is capable of processing low-dimensional datasets like our small data. Additionally, it has a short training time and operates well under GPU processing, which can mitigate potential high memory requirements despite its computational intensiveness. LUNAR specifically lacks weaknesses associated with small data size or low memory, making it a better fit compared to other models which either struggle with small datasets or have significant memory usage concerns." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is selected because it explicitly lists 'tabular data' as a strength, aligns well with 'technology' domain, and can handle 'low-signal data' through its robust feature learning capabilities. Although it has high memory requirements, it fits better than other options as they either are negatively impacted by the 'small data size' or 'low memory'. VAE's strength in handling 'tabular data' and usability in the 'technology' domain, while having a relatively short training time, makes it the most reasonable model considering the task's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and the technology domain, which matches the dataset. It has strengths in handling tabular data and can manage low-signal data issues better than other models in the list. Although it requires more memory, VAE compensates with a short training time and robustness to noisy data, aligning with the requirement for low memory usage and addressing the challenges presented by the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice for this dataset, which is small, consists of tabular data, and belongs to the technology domain. Its strengths in handling tabular data, short training times, and scalable processing make it a strong candidate. Despite requiring high memory, which conflicts with the 'low memory' requirement, it balances well with other dataset properties and characterized model weaknesses compared to other models. The other models either explicitly list 'small data size' and 'low-signal data' as weaknesses or do not sufficiently align with the domain and data type needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It handles sparse and imbalanced data well and has a short training time, which is important for low memory environments. Although it requires high memory and is computationally intensive, its strengths with tabular data and scalability make it the most suitable choice among the provided models given the dataset's constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is specifically designed to handle tabular data, which matches the dataset's type. It can handle low-dimensional datasets effectively, and it has strengths in technology domains. Additionally, it requires short training time and low memory, which aligns with the requirement for low memory and the characteristics of the small dataset size. Despite its weaknesses in noisy data and high memory, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the best choice given the dataset properties. It is specifically noted for its strengths in handling tabular data and technology domains, both of which match the dataset tags. Despite being slightly memory-intensive, VAE has short training times which are beneficial for small datasets. Its capability to work well with low-signal data and general robustness in technology-related applications make it the most suitable choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which is the data type of the dataset, and its applicability in the technology domain. Despite its high memory requirement, it performs well with noisy data and short training time, which could be beneficial given the low-signal characteristic of the dataset. While not ideal for small datasets, it offers more relevant strengths for the dataset requirements compared to the other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and technology domains, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Although it typically requires high memory, its strengths include a short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it capable of handling low memory requirements with appropriate adjustments. Despite its weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data, the dataset's characteristics of low-signal data make VAE a more robust choice among the available models, as it handles tabular data well and can be adapted for low-memory use cases." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, its efficient performance on low-dimensional datasets, and its capability of operating under constraints of short training time and scalability to large datasets. The model's adaptable architecture is advantageous given the requirement for low memory usage, and it can address the low-signal nature of the dataset better than the alternatives." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for the given dataset as it supports tabular data and is applicable in the technology domain, which aligns with the dataset requirements. Despite the dataset being small and the data characterized as low-signal, VAE does not have specific weaknesses that conflict significantly with these properties compared to other models. While VAE requires high memory, which is a consideration, it overall handles the tabular data type present in a low-signal environment better than the other models on the list that have more critical weaknesses related to small datasets or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model due to its compatibility with tabular data and technology domain, which aligns with the dataset properties. Despite the dataset being small, VAE's strength in handling tabular data with efficient training time makes it a better fit compared to others. Additionally, VAE operates well with low-signal data and requires low memory, addressing the additional requirements of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and requirements. It supports tabular data and is effective in technology domains, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its weaknesses in handling small data size, it matches better than other models because it can operate with low-signal data and deals with technology-oriented domains. VAE also has the advantage of shorter training times and scalability, fitting the low memory requirements. While not perfect, it provides the best trade-offs among the models listed for this specific dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this scenario due to its strength in handling tabular data, which aligns well with the dataset properties. It also has the capability to work with low-dimensional datasets, as indicated by the dataset's 'low-signal data' characteristic. Furthermore, LUNAR has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the requirement for low memory usage. The weaknesses of LUNAR, such as high memory and computational intensity, are less impactful given other models have more severe weaknesses for small datasets and low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the dataset properties given that it supports tabular data, is relevant to the technology domain, and requires low memory. While it has some weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced datasets, these issues are less significant compared to its competitors' weaknesses in handling small data sizes, which is a significant factor in this selection process. Additionally, VAE models have a short training time, which compensates for the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it handles tabular data well, has a short training time, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags of tabular data and low-memory requirements. Additionally, LUNAR's strengths in dealing with low-dimensional datasets and its GPU capability fit the technology domain, despite the dataset's low-signal characteristics and small size. The model's minimal memory demand aligns well with the need for low memory utilization." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset. It is particularly strong with tabular data and technology-related domains, which aligns well with the given dataset tags. While VAE models typically require high memory, they are well-suited for situations with low-signal data and short training time, despite the dataset size being small, which is a general weakness of most models. Additionally, VAE supports high-dimensionality scenarios, and the requirement for low memory might not pose a significant issue given the 'small' data size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is chosen as it handles tabular data and is suitable for the technology domain. Among the available options, it effectively deals with noisy data and achieves short training times, which helps with the low memory requirement. Although it generally requires high memory, its overall strengths align better with the dataset properties, including the ability to handle low-signal data, compared to other models which have more pronounced weaknesses with small datasets and low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's 'tabular data' tag. It also works well with low-dimensional datasets, making it appropriate for 'low-signal data', which indicates simpler patterns may be prevalent. Additionally, LUNAR supports low memory requirements, aligning with the additional requirement of 'low memory'. Although it typically uses high memory, it is more computationally optimal for small datasets compared to other models that strongly oppose low memory and small data sizes." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected due to its strengths with tabular data and technology domains, matching the dataset's characteristics. It requires low memory and has a short training time, making it suitable for small data sizes. Although its weaknesses include handling discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these do not significantly impact this dataset according to the given tags. Overall, VAE provides a good balance for low-signal data within the technology domain." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's type. It also excels with low-dimensional, sparse, and imbalanced data that could be associated with low-signal datasets. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time and is scalable, aligning well with the requirement for low memory usage. While it does not explicitly mention small data size as a strength, it does not have it as a weakness unlike other models. This makes it more suitable for the provided dataset compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model as it excels with tabular data and is capable of handling low-dimensional, sparse, and imbalanced datasets, which are relevant for the given dataset properties. It also has short training time and low memory usage, which aligns well with the need for low memory consumption." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice because it is effective with tabular data and works well with low-dimensional datasets. It also requires low memory usage and provides short training times, which fits the dataset's small size and low-memory requirement. While LUNAR may have weaknesses with high memory and being computationally intensive, its strengths align better with the dataset characteristics compared to the other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is chosen because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It is also suitable for technology domain applications and can work well with low-memory requirements due to its short training time. Furthermore, the VAE model can handle tabular data and is capable of managing low-signal data when well-tuned. Although it has some weaknesses like handling imbalanced or sparse data, these are not the primary concerns given the dataset's properties. Its ability to operate under constraints that are present in the dataset, such as low memory and small data size, makes it the most suitable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model because it is designed to handle tabular data and is efficient with low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the small and low-signal characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR's strengths in handling tabular data and short training time make it ideal for datasets with low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches our dataset requirements. It also caters to datasets in the technology domain, which aligns with our dataset's domain tag. Despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data, which is not specified as a concern, VAE offers short training time and is adaptable to technology data, making it a suitable choice for low-signal data on small datasets with low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data in the technology domain, which matches the dataset's attributes. Despite its classification as high memory, it has a relatively short training time, which is beneficial considering the additional low memory requirement. While the VAE generally performs well with larger datasets, it does not explicitly have weaknesses related to small data sizes like some other models, making it a more balanced choice for the current scenario. Additionally, VAEs can handle low-signal data better than other models listed, ensuring it can effectively work with the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and model characteristics. It excels with tabular data, aligns with the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset, and is capable of handling small data size effectively given its strength in low-dimensional datasets. Although it is computationally intensive, its short training time and scalability to large datasets make it a suitable candidate, especially considering the need for low memory usage in the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it specifically strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR is capable of handling low-dimensional and sparse data, which is beneficial for addressing the low-signal nature of the dataset. Despite its weaknesses in handling high memory, the short training time and scalability to large datasets make it a suitable choice given the small data size and low memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is scalable to large datasets, has a short training time, and does not have an explicit small data size weakness. Importantly, LUNAR does not have a low memory constraint, making it more suitable given the low memory requirement in the dataset tags. While it generally requires GPU and can be computationally intensive, its ability to handle tabular and low-dimensional datasets makes it a better fit compared to other models that have a weakness with small data sizes or specifically require high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is most suitable for this dataset because it supports tabular data, is favorable for the technology domain, and has short training time, which aligns well with the dataset needs. While it generally requires high memory, the dataset's small size might mitigate this issue. Despite its weakness with discrete or categorical data, the lack of emphasis on 'sparse data' or 'imbalanced data' makes VAE a better fit compared to others that have explicit weaknesses in these areas. Additionally, VAE does not have specific weaknesses related to low-signal data, unlike some other options, making it the best available choice from the given list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "Given the dataset properties, VAE is suitable due to its strengths in handling tabular data and technology domains. It is capable of managing low-signal and small datasets efficiently, despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data. Its short training time and compatibility with tabular structures make it particularly fit for a small dataset with low memory constraints. Although it doesn't handle imbalanced data well, this is not a specified issue in the dataset characteristics provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it is specifically suited for tabular data, which is the type of data we have. It also has the ability to handle low-dimensional datasets, which relates well to the low-signal nature of the data. Furthermore, LUNAR supports short training times and scalability, all while working under low memory conditions, aligning well with the dataset's requirements. Although LUNAR is sensitive to hyperparameters and computationally intensive, these drawbacks are less significant given the dataset's properties and the specific constraints outlined." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is small, comprises tabular data, and is in the technology domain with low-signal characteristics. Most models have a weakness with small data sizes, but VAE explicitly includes strengths in managing tabular and technology-related datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's tags. Additionally, VAE has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory requirement, making it more suitable than other models that have long training times or high memory requirements. Despite its strength in high-memory environments, its ability to handle tabular data in technology and short training time makes it the best available choice from the provided list." + } + ], + "wbc": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational AutoEncoder) is selected because it performs well with tabular data and healthcare domains, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it effectively manages high dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. While VAE generally requires high memory and is not explicitly optimized for low memory environments, among the choices, it has strengths aligned closely with the medical and tabular data context. Other models either have primary weaknesses with small datasets or insufficient support for tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset's tags. VAE also has strengths in healthcare, making it a good fit for the medical domain. While it typically requires high memory, the absence of low memory as a weakness indicates that it may perform adequately under the given constraints. Additionally, VAE offers short training times and can handle small data sizes well, making it a balanced choice for this specific context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it is suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality and it works well in the healthcare domain. While it does require high memory, it is favorable for small data sizes with short training times. It can handle the high dimensionality characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, its robustness to noisy data and high-dimensional datasets aligns well with the dataset properties, making it the most suitable choice from the list provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for the given dataset as it supports tabular data, which matches the data type requirement. Additionally, it handles high dimensionality well, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Although the dataset is small, VAE has strengths in healthcare and offers short training time, which can be beneficial given the dataset's small size. The model is also able to work with noisy data and can scale efficiently to larger datasets, which provides future flexibility. While VAE does require high memory, its other strengths align closely with the dataset properties, making it the most suitable choice given the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model fits well with the dataset properties because it effectively handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which are significant characteristics of the given dataset. Additionally, it is suitable for the medical domain, providing strengths in healthcare data applications. Despite not being intrinsically optimized for small datasets, VAE's ability to work with tabular data and its compatibility with GPU for efficient computation are beneficial. Furthermore, VAE can be adapted to work with low memory settings more effectively than other models on the list. This makes it the best available choice given the dataset's properties and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and can handle high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. VAE also supports medical and healthcare domains, which is critical in this context. Despite being characterized as requiring high memory, VAE offers advantages in short training time and the ability to handle noisy data, although the memory constraint is a concern. Overall, considering the dataset's small size and tabular nature, VAE strikes a balance in handling high dimensionality and medical domain suitability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is well-suited for tabular data and specifically addresses high dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It is also oriented towards healthcare, aligning with the medical domain of the dataset. Although VAEs typically require high memory, they offer short training times and are suitable for processing data with noise, which is relevant even if not explicitly part of the dataset tag. Despite the dataset's small size, VAE has strengths that closely match the dataset's properties better than the other models available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also suitable for high dimensionality, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Although it has a weakness in handling imbalanced data, it does not have a specific weakness for small data sizes as mentioned for AE1SVM and others. Additionally, VAE has a short training time, which compensates for its higher memory requirement. Overall, its compatibility with healthcare and capacity to handle high dimensionality while working on tabular data makes it the most fitting choice among the models listed, considering the given dataset properties and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and can handle high dimensionality, which is a characteristic of the given dataset. Moreover, it has a short training time and is capable of dealing with noisy data, which aligns well with the medical domain in high-dimensional spaces. Although it requires high memory, this is a small dataset, so the memory requirement is less of a concern. Other models were ruled out because they either do not support tabular or small datasets effectively or require high memory, which is a constraint." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is suitable for a small dataset with tabular data in the medical domain and exhibits strengths for high dimensionality data. Although VAE has high memory requirements, it aligns well with the rest of the dataset properties, including its ability to handle high dimensionality and tabular data effectively within the healthcare domain. Moreover, it offers short training time compared to other models which makes it more viable for constrained resources." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is well-suited for small, high-dimensional tabular datasets, particularly in the medical domain. It has strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, both of which are characteristics of the dataset. While it typically requires high memory, the requirement for short training time and suitability for high-dimensional tabular data make it a strong candidate despite the dataset's small size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for small, high-dimensional tabular medical datasets, as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data well, which matches the dataset tags provided. Although VAEs typically require high memory, this model has the advantage of short training times, which helps in situations with low memory constraints. Moreover, it does not show significant weaknesses for small data sizes compared to other models. Its capability to work with medical domains further aligns with the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is chosen because it specializes in fitting on high dimensional tabular data, which is crucial for the given dataset characteristics. It is also tailored for medical applications. Although it has weaknesses with small data sizes and low memory scenarios, compared to other models, it offers a balanced handling of the required properties, excluding small dataset handling where most models show weaknesses. It also has the advantage of short training times, which is beneficial for low memory scenarios." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is specifically strong for tabular data, which aligns well with the dataset type. It also performs well with high dimensionality, a characteristic of the dataset. While it is not as strong with small data sizes due to its computational intensity, it promises short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it efficient once appropriately configured within its strengths." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected because it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which align with the dataset characteristics. It also has strengths in the medical domain and has a short training time, which is beneficial for small datasets. While it typically uses high memory, its strength in handling high dimensionality and scalability makes it the most suitable choice given the dataset's high dimensionality and low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) aligns well with the dataset's properties: it is suitable for tabular data and is often used in healthcare domains, making it relevant for medical data. It can handle high dimensionality, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Despite its higher memory usage, VAE's strengths in short training time and ability to handle noisy data make it a viable candidate, especially given the low memory requirement constraint. Most other models either struggle with tabular data, have issues with small datasets, or require high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it is one of the few models strong in tabular data, healthcare, and high dimensionality, which aligns well with the given dataset properties. Despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data, VAE offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets while being suitable for the medical domain. It is not heavily penalized for small data sizes, a critical requirement of this dataset. The low memory requirement is a challenge for VAE, but its strengths in the other necessary areas make it a suitable compromise." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for the dataset as it supports tabular data, healthcare domain, and high dimensionality. It is well-suited for small datasets as it can provide short training times. Despite its requirement for high memory, no other model perfectly matches the dataset's characteristics better while aligning with the low memory requirement, except in its ability to adequately handle the specific strengths required by the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the best choice for this dataset because it handles tabular data well, which is our primary data type. It is also suited for high dimensionality, a characteristic of our dataset, and it works effectively in the medical domain. Although the dataset size is small, the strengths of VAE in handling tabular data and high dimensionality outweigh this weakness. Additionally, despite its higher memory requirements, it has a short training time, which is advantageous when low memory is desired. Other models, such as AnoGAN, MO-GAAL, and AE1SVM, have notable weaknesses with small data size or low memory, making them less ideal for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which are crucial for this dataset. It is also known for its applicability in healthcare, making it relevant for the medical domain. Although it requires high memory, it has shorter training time and includes well with high-dimensional datasets which aligns with the dataset characteristics despite its constraint on data size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data and is well-suited for healthcare or medical domains. It also handles high dimensionality effectively, which is an important characteristic of the dataset. Though VAE generally requires high memory, the other choices are not better suited due to their significant weaknesses in the context of medical tabular data with high dimensionality and low memory requirements. The VAE's capability of processing small datasets overcomes some of the trade-offs required." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is highly suitable for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are relevant characteristics of the dataset. Furthermore, it performs well in the medical domain and offers short training times, which is beneficial given the low-memory requirement. While it generally requires high memory, the short training time and compatibility with tabular, high-dimensional data make it a good fit despite the small data size. This balance of relevant strengths makes VAE the most suitable choice among the given models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for small tabular datasets with high dimensionality, matching the dataset's properties. It performs well in medical and healthcare domains and handles high dimensionality effectively. VAE is also efficient in terms of memory usage with a short training time, which aligns with the low memory requirements. While it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, these do not outweigh its advantages for the dataset at hand." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable for this dataset because it handles tabular and high-dimensional data effectively, which matches the dataset's tabular data type and high-dimensionality characteristic. Additionally, it operates well within domains such as healthcare, aligning with the medical domain of the dataset. Despite its requirement for high memory, VAE's short training time and compatibility with GPU make it a viable option given the dataset's small size and low memory requirement constraints. Its ability to handle high-dimensionality and noisy data further solidifies its suitability for this use case." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for this scenario because it handles high dimensionality well, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It also supports tabular data and is strong in the healthcare domain, aligning with the medical domain of the dataset. Additionally, VAE features a short training time and can be applied to small datasets, making it a better fit compared to other models that either have a weakness with small datasets or require more memory than specified." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected as it is well-suited for tabular data and the healthcare domain, handling high dimensionality efficiently. It supports scenarios with noisy data, which is a characteristic of the dataset, though with limited constraints on the presence of noisy data in this particular context. While VAE requires high memory, its strengths in handling small datasets in healthcare and tabular contexts outweigh this minor weakness. It also offers short training times in most circumstances, making it a practical choice for datasets with high dimensionality and low memory requirements, providing a good balance between the dataset characteristics and the model's capabilities." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset's properties. It is well-suited for tabular data and can handle high dimensionality, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, LUNAR offers low memory usage and short training time, which aligns with the requirement for low memory. While it is not specifically tagged for the medical domain, its compatibility with tabular data and short training time makes it a better fit than the other models, which have weaknesses related to small data sizes or high memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. Although it typically requires high memory, it has a short training time and is capable of working with smaller datasets when optimized properly, making it a reasonable fit considering the low memory requirement. Other models have significant weaknesses related to the given dataset characteristics such as being unsuitable for small datasets or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected as it is suitable for tabular data and has strengths in handling high dimensionality and healthcare (medical) datasets. While it usually requires high memory, its ability to deal with noisy data and provide a short training time makes it the best fit given the constraints. Other models in the list either have significant weaknesses with small datasets or are unsuitable for tabular data and low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which aligns with the dataset's properties. While it generally requires high memory, it has a short training time, making it more efficient for a small dataset compared to other models. Despite the weakness with low memory, its ability to work well with healthcare data, accommodating the medical domain, makes it a preferable option among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset as it handles high dimensionality and is applicable for tabular data and medical domains, which match the dataset tags. Although it is not ideal for small data sizes and low memory usage, its strengths in managing high dimensionality, optimal tabular data handling, and capability in the medical field make it the most suitable choice compared to the other models. Other candidate models either lack strengths in tabular or medical datasets, or have significant weaknesses such as inefficiency with small data sizes or low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality, as well as within the medical domain, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It also has a short training time and works well on GPUs. Though it generally requires high memory, it accommodates small datasets, which matches the requirement for a low memory footprint, given the dataset is small. Its strengths in healthcare and high dimensionality make it an appropriate choice for this task." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is chosen because it accommodates tabular data and is suitable for high-dimensional datasets, which matches the dataset properties. Despite requiring high memory, it fits the small size of the dataset due to its ability to handle short training times well, making it more efficient for the given constraints compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the best choice as it effectively handles small tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which matches the given dataset's properties. It also works well in medical domains. While it requires higher memory, it offers short training times and is scalable, which makes it suitable under memory constraints when configured properly. Despite its weakness with discrete or categorical data, the dataset is tagged as tabular and high dimensional, which aligns well with VAE's strengths. In contrast, issues like small dataset size and low memory significantly hinder other model alternatives." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable because it handles tabular data and healthcare domains well, matching the dataset's medical domain tag. It is also strong with high dimensionality, which fits the dataset's characteristics. VAE has a short training time, which compensates for the small data size's potential issues, and while it has weaknesses with imbalanced data and low memory, it doesn't explicitly state a problem with small dataset sizes, unlike models such as AE1SVM or ALAD. This makes VAE the best fit among the options, despite not being optimized for low memory settings." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model given the dataset's properties. It excels in handling high-dimensional tabular and medical data, and it offers short training times which is beneficial for smaller datasets. Despite requiring higher memory, its strengths align well with the dataset characteristics, specifically its ability to manage high dimensionality and tabular data. Additionally, VAEs are equipped to deal with noisy data, and while they might not be the best for discrete or categorical data, the provided dataset does not specify such requirements, making VAE a compatible choice for this task." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data with short training times, aligning with the dataset's need for low memory usage. Despite its minor weakness of needing high memory, it supports high dimensionality, which is a crucial aspect of the dataset. The model's strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data also complement the high-dimensional medical dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, healthcare domain data, and high-dimensional datasets, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite the small data size and low memory requirements which are not its strengths, VAE excels in short training time and can efficiently manage high dimensionality typical of medical datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model is selected because it is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data, includes strengths in the healthcare/medical domain, and effectively handles noisy data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Although VAE requires high memory, its short training time is advantageous given the small data size, and it is scalable, which aligns with dataset constraints and the need for low memory requirements as much as possible." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it handles tabular data and high dimensionality well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Despite its weakness on discrete or categorical data, it requires short training time and is scalable, which aligns with the requirement for low memory usage. Even though VAE typically uses high memory, the focus on the strengths that match the dataset's high dimensionality and compatibility with tabular data in the medical domain make it the best option compared to other models, which have more significant weaknesses related to small data size or the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality and is known for handling healthcare-related datasets well. It performs effectively on small datasets and requires low memory, which aligns well with the dataset requirements. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced data, this aspect is not highlighted in the dataset tags, making VAE the most compatible choice from the list considering both strengths and weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it is tailored for tabular data and can handle small data sizes, which is crucial given the dataset's size characteristic. It also offers short training time and scalability for large datasets, making it adaptable for future data expansions. Although it has high memory usage as a weakness, other models that handle small datasets better do not align well with the tabular data type or low memory requirement in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data, is used in healthcare contexts, and can handle high dimensionality which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. While it may have weaknesses with small data sizes, other models also share this limitation or have other significant weaknesses such as low memory or incompatibility with tabular data. The AutoEncoder is optimized for high-dimensional healthcare data and has short training times, making it a feasible option despite the given constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is specifically strong with tabular data, which fits the dataset's data type. VAE handles high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite having a weakness in low-memory requirements, other models in the list have more critical weaknesses regarding small data size, making them less suitable. VAE also has a short training time and is known for its applicability in the medical domain, matching the dataset's domain needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, which is the type of data in this dataset. It is well-suited for high dimensionality, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Even though it is not optimized for small data sizes, it is a good fit considering other model options that have more prominent weaknesses relative to this dataset, especially with low memory requirements. Moreover, AutoEncoder has short training time and scalability, making it advantageous for the given context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for small, tabular, high-dimensional medical datasets, matching all the given dataset properties. Although VAE has memory constraints, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data while being applicable to healthcare make it the best choice among the provided models. VAE's short training time and ability to work with noisy data further align well with the dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data in the medical domain with high dimensionality, which aligns well with the dataset properties. It also requires low memory, a critical factor for the dataset. Although VAE has weaknesses with imbalanced data, this is not a specified characteristic of the dataset, making it a more feasible choice compared to others that have more significant weaknesses for small data sizes. VAE also supports short training time, which is beneficial given the dataset's small size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is selected because it handles tabular data effectively and works well with datasets that have high dimensionality. It also supports datasets with sparse and imbalanced characteristics, which are common in medical data. While it requires high memory, the short training time and capability to handle small datasets make it suitable for this scenario where memory needs to be optimized. Given these considerations, it balances the dataset needs of being high-dimensional and tabular with practical computational constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data, is suitable for healthcare and high dimensionality, both of which align with our dataset properties. It is capable of coming to terms with noisy data and offers a short training time, which is advantageous given the need for low memory use. Although it generally requires high memory, its strengths outweigh its weaknesses compared to other models in the list, particularly for small datasets that it can efficiently manage due to its general adaptability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is selected because it supports tabular data and works with high-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset characteristics of tabular data and high dimensionality. Although the dataset is small, LUNAR's strength in handling sparse and imbalanced data, along with its short training time, offers flexibility and adaptability. Moreover, despite LUNAR's weakness of being computationally intensive, its ability to work with low-dimensional datasets mitigates the concern of high dimensionality and low memory requirements, making it a suitable choice for the given conditions." + } + ], + "glass": [ + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the best choice because it excels with tabular data and is suitable for small datasets, as indicated by its strength in low-dimensional datasets. It features low memory consumption with short training times, which matches the requirement of low memory usage. Additionally, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets, making it versatile for various dataset sizes, unlike other models with weaknesses in handling small data sizes." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is described as 'small', 'tabular data', with a requirement for 'low memory'. LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and is characterized by short training time and good scalability to large datasets. While it is acknowledged for its high memory usage, it has strengths in handling low-dimensional datasets and sparse data, which might offset the memory demand on small data size, making it the optimal choice among the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset as it is designed for tabular data and performs well on small datasets. It is also compatible with low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the small data size and low memory requirement. Additionally, LUNAR offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it a resilient option as data size or complexity potentially increases." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this scenario because it specifically lists tabular data as a strength and is well-suited for low-dimensional datasets. It also has a short training time and is capable of handling sparse and imbalanced data, which might be beneficial even if these are not specified. Although it can be computationally intensive and requires high memory, the low memory requirement of the dataset is a challenge but other models show more serious alignment issues regarding dataset size or data type. Additionally, other models either have explicit weaknesses with small datasets or tabular data, making them less ideal choices." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is suitable for this scenario because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the data type in the dataset. While it generally has higher memory requirements, it offers short training times and does not explicitly list small data size as a weakness, making it a better option than models like AnoGAN, AE1SVM, and ALAD, which suffer from weaknesses related to small data size. Furthermore, VAE manages noisy data effectively, aligning with the characteristics of the dataset. Therefore, VAE balances an acceptable trade-off given the low memory constraint and matches well with tabular data processing needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is best suited for this dataset because it demonstrates strengths in handling tabular data, which is a critical dataset characteristic. Additionally, it supports low-dimensional datasets, which is likely applicable given the small data size. LUNAR also has a short training time and is scalable, making it well-suited for low-memory environments. Although LUNAR is computationally intensive and exhibits high memory usage during hyperparameter tuning, its strengths align most closely with the dataset requirements compared to other models in the list, which typically suffer from weaknesses such as inefficiency with small data size or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it has strengths in handling tabular data and small data size is not listed as a weakness. Additionally, it offers short training time, which aligns well with the requirement for low memory usage. Other models either have small data size or low memory listed as a weakness." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags. It is also characterized by short training times and scalability to large datasets, which can accommodate small data size. Despite the dataset's requirement for low memory usage, LUNAR is preferable to other models that have weaknesses in handling small data sizes and low memory situations." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Despite having a small data size, LUNAR's strength lies in handling tabular, low-dimensional datasets efficiently. Moreover, it meets the additional low-memory requirement better than other models, as its weaknesses do not include memory concerns and it boasts a short training time. This makes LUNAR a good fit for the given requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties: it is designed for tabular data, supports low-dimensional datasets, operates well with low memory, and has a short training time. While the dataset size is small, LUNAR's strengths and scalability make it a better fit than the other models available, which generally have weaknesses with low memory or small datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model is the most suitable choice for this scenario due to its capability to handle tabular data and its strength in dealing with small, low-memory datasets. Although not explicitly noted for supporting low memory, it has a short training time which can indirectly assist in managing memory constraints. Other models have explicit weaknesses towards small datasets or low memory, making them less suitable for this specific dataset configuration." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is small and is composed of tabular data with a need for low memory usage. LUNAR is strong in handling tabular data, works well with low-dimensional datasets, and operates with short training time, making it suitable for small datasets with low memory requirements. While it requires GPU, it fits better compared to other models which generally have weaknesses in managing small data sizes or require high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data, which is the type of dataset provided. Although it requires high memory, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the additional requirement of low memory. Additionally, VAE's handling of noisy data might be beneficial if the dataset contains noise, making it a balanced choice despite some of its weaknesses on small data sizes." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type provided. It is also optimized for small, low-dimensional datasets and operates efficiently under low memory constraints. Though it has weaknesses like high memory usage, these do not directly affect its ability to handle small datasets and tabular data. Additionally, LUNAR's strengths in short training time and scalability are advantageous compared to other models with small data size weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Although it does not explicitly mention small data sets as a strength, it does not have it listed as a weakness either, which is a better fit compared to other options that list small data size as a weakness. Additionally, VAE has a short training time and supports high dimensionality, which can be beneficial even for small datasets. While it does require high memory, the absence of a low memory constraint as a strength in other models makes VAE a balanced choice given the provided requirements and model analyses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is suitable for small tabular datasets with low memory requirements. It explicitly lists tabular data as one of its strengths and has a short training time, which is beneficial for small datasets. While it mentions high memory as a weakness, it does not adversely affect datasets of small sizes. Thus, LUNAR's ability to handle tabular data efficiently and its robustness against imbalanced and sparse data makes it a fitting choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also efficient with low-dimensional datasets and requires low memory as per the dataset's additional requirements. While the dataset is small, LUNAR offers short training times and is scalable to large datasets, making it adaptable without over-specializing on large memory usage. Additionally, LUNAR does not have 'small data size' as a weakness, unlike many other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. While it does have weaknesses regarding small datasets, its strengths include handling tabular data effectively and offering short training time, which is beneficial given the 'low memory' requirement. Other models either do not support tabular data or have significant weaknesses when applied to small datasets and low memory scenarios." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is strongest in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Although it has some weaknesses with small data size, it is relatively better suited compared to others in terms of handling tabular data with low memory requirements. The other models either do not support tabular data optimally or have significant weaknesses with small datasets and low memory, making VAE the most suitable option from the list provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, a key aspect of the dataset. Despite the small data size being a weakness, VAE's strengths in handling tabular data, coupled with short training times and low memory requirements, make it the most appropriate choice from the model list. Other models have more significant weaknesses related to small data size and low memory that make them less suited for the given dataset constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this task as it is specifically designed to handle tabular data and is capable of working with small datasets, which aligns with the 'small' and 'low memory' requirements of the dataset. While it does not have high memory efficiency as a strength, it is the most aligned with the given data characteristics compared to other models that have significant weaknesses with small data size or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is small in size, composed of tabular data, and requires low memory usage. LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, has a short training time, and is scalable to large datasets. It excels with low-dimensional datasets and does not have the issue of requiring high memory, which aligns well with the dataset's requirement for low memory usage. While LUNAR has a weakness with images and high memory requirements, these are not dataset requirements or issues, making it a more suitable model compared to others in the list that either poorly handle small datasets or require high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice for a small tabular dataset with the requirement of low memory usage. It is specifically mentioned as strong in handling tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, sparse and imbalanced data, and involves short training time, all of which are essential given the dataset's 'small' size and 'tabular data' characteristics. Additionally, it can be scalable to large datasets, ensuring flexibility for future data growth. While LUNAR has weaknesses concerning high memory usage, its strength in tabular data and lower computational costs makes it the optimal model from the provided list, given the dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset requires a model suitable for small, low-memory tabular data. LUNAR is capable of working well with tabular data while keeping low memory requirements in mind. It offers short training times and scalability, which can be beneficial for further adaptation. Although it is generally computationally intensive, its strengths align with the low-memory and small data size needs better than other models in the list, making it a suitable choice for the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is small and consists of tabular data with a low memory requirement. Among the available models, VAE handles tabular data well. While it does have higher memory usage typically associated with its strengths, its short training time and capability with small datasets align with the dataset's characteristics. Although not a perfect fit, it is the best option considering the requirements outlined, as the alternatives have more severe weaknesses in relation to small data sizes or low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it can handle tabular data effectively, which is a specific requirement of the dataset. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and short training times, which are beneficial for extracting meaningful insights from even small datasets. Despite its general requirement for high memory, it's the most suitable considering alternatives' greater weaknesses for the dataset specifics, particularly in dealing with small data size and the need for low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type, and it is designed for low-dimensional datasets, which fits the small data size requirement. It also operates efficiently with sparse data and is scalable to large datasets, offering flexibility beyond the current dataset's small size. Additionally, LUNAR supports low memory usage which is an explicit requirement. While it has some weaknesses like being computationally intensive, these are not critical given the dataset constraints and the context provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model as it is well-suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It also efficiently handles small datasets and requires low memory, which matches the additional dataset requirement. Furthermore, it offers scalability and short training time, making it an efficient choice given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is a suitable choice given the dataset properties because it specializes in tabular data, which matches the data type provided. Additionally, despite the small data size, LUNAR is strong with low-dimensional datasets and offers short training time, making it ideal for environments with low memory requirements. Its ability to handle sparse and imbalanced data could also be beneficial. Although LUNAR needs high memory, the other strengths outweigh its weaknesses compared with other models available in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the best choice given the dataset characteristics and requirements. It is suitable for tabular data, accommodates low-dimensional datasets, and ensures a short training time while being scalable to large datasets. Importantly, LUNAR has a strength in handling imbalanced and sparse data which might be relevant given the dataset's small size. It also addresses the low memory requirement better than other models in the list, as it is not explicitly stated to have high memory usage as a weakness, minimizing computational intensive concerns." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this scenario because it supports tabular data, requires low memory, and performs well with small datasets. The dataset is described as small and tabular, so LUNAR's strengths including handling low-dimensional datasets with sparse or imbalanced data make it an optimal fit. While other models may handle tabular data effectively, they often have weaknesses in low memory scenarios or small dataset sizes which align with the dataset's constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "Given the small size and tabular nature of the dataset, along with the need for low memory usage, VAE is the most suitable option. It supports tabular data well and has a short training time. Though it has high memory usage as a weakness, it remains more compatible with the dataset than other models which have more pronounced weaknesses for small datasets or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice as it is explicitly designed for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles low-dimensional datasets effectively, which is ideal given the small data size requirement. LUNAR also requires only short training time, a crucial consideration for the low memory requirement. Therefore, it aligns well with the dataset's constraints and tags, even though it has some weaknesses in hyperparameter sensitivity and computational intensity, which are manageable given the scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, aligns well with the requirement for handling small datasets due to its short training time, and can operate within a low memory constraint. Despite its weakness with small datasets, it is relatively better suited compared to other options, as it can manage tabular data efficiently without excessive memory use and has a short training time, which are critical given the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the dataset because it supports tabular data and small dataset sizes, aligns well with low-memory requirements, and offers short training time and scalability, which are beneficial given the dataset constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for small tabular datasets with low memory requirements. It has strengths in handling tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, and provides short training times, which align with the dataset's properties. Unlike the other models, it does not explicitly list 'small data size' as a weakness, and its low memory usage fits the additional requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most appropriate choice for this dataset as it supports tabular data and is well-suited for small datasets due to its short training time. It also performs well on low-dimensional datasets and can run with low memory requirements, matching the dataset's needs for a model that consumes minimal resources. Despite some weaknesses in handling certain data types, its strengths align closely with the dataset's characteristics, making it more suitable than the other models listed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is small and tabular with a requirement for low memory usage. While VAE does not explicitly have strengths in low memory usage, it supports tabular data and has a short training time, which is beneficial for small datasets. VAE's capacity to work with tabular data and its overall compatibility with the given dataset characteristics make it the most suitable choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Although it is designed for larger datasets, it offers short training time, which is beneficial for small datasets. It does not have low memory requirements, which is a disadvantage, but compared to other options, it aligns closely with dataset needs without significant weaknesses. VAE's strengths include handling noisy data, easy integration with GPU, and short training time, making it the best fit among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is chosen because it is compatible with tabular data and addresses the requirement for low memory usage due to its short training time. Despite its need for high memory, VAE does not explicitly have 'low memory' as a weakness, unlike other models. Most critically, VAE is well-suited for small datasets, making it the best choice considering the dataset properties and limited compatibility of other models with small data sizes." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is a strong fit for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also suitable for small datasets as it works well with low-dimensional datasets, and has low memory requirements which aligns with the additional requirement of low memory consumption. LUNAR supports scalable learning with short training times, making it efficient for small datasets while ensuring effective performance." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is small and of tabular type, with low memory requirements. VAE is particularly suitable for tabular data and has a short training time, compensating for the dataset's small size. Despite its high memory usage, it aligns more closely with the dataset characteristics compared to other models, which have significant weaknesses in tabular data or require larger datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is small, tabular, and requires a low memory footprint. Despite LUNAR's high memory usage weakness, it is suitable for tabular data, has short training time, and supports small, low-dimensional datasets, matching the dataset properties. Its strength in handling sparse and imbalanced data, along with short training times, makes it the best fit among the options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset because it excels with tabular data and is designed for low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics and size. It also has efficient memory usage and short training time, making it apt for low-memory constraints, which is a requirement here. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which can be beneficial as the dataset grows." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the best choice for the given dataset properties because it supports tabular data and has strengths in handling low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset characteristics of being small in size and tabular in nature. It also offers low memory usage and short training time, which meet the additional requirement of low memory. While it has weaknesses related to images and audio, these are not relevant to the dataset type at hand." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model because it excels with tabular data, which matches the dataset data type. It also handles low-dimensional and sparse data well, aligning with the dataset's need for low memory usage. Additionally, LUNAR offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which are advantageous attributes that align with small data size constraints, even though high memory might be a concern. Other models like VAE and AutoEncoder have weaknesses with small data and low memory, making them less suitable in this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for a small tabular dataset with low memory requirements. It specifically strengths in handling tabular data and small datasets, with efficient memory usage and short training time which meets the dataset's additional requirements. Unlike other models, it does not have significant weaknesses for small dataset sizes or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected as it aligns well with the dataset properties of being small, tabular, and requiring low memory. It is specifically strong for tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, making it well-suited for handling the provided dataset. Moreover, LUNAR has a short training time and does not rely on high memory, which suits the additional requirement of low memory usage. While it has some weaknesses such as being computationally intensive, its strengths play well into the dataset characteristics provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice as it specifically lists tabular data as a strength, matches the requirement of being efficient for low-dimensional datasets, and is scalable to large datasets. Additionally, it suits low memory requirements with short training time, making it ideal for small data sizes. While it is computationally intensive, its strengths align well with the dataset characterized as small, tabular, and requiring low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this case because it is designed to handle tabular data efficiently, which aligns with the dataset type specified. Additionally, it requires low memory and has a short training time, making it ideal for a small dataset with low memory requirements. While it is computationally intensive, its compatibility with GPU can compensate for this, and it is scalable to large datasets, which provides flexibility for future data expansion." + } + ], + "satimage-2": [ + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality and high memory requirements, as indicated by the dataset tags. Its strengths include handling high dimensionality, tabular data, and scalability to large datasets, which align perfectly with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, AE1SVM benefits from using GPU and a short training time, making it efficient for large-scale applications in technology domains." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for large datasets with high dimensionality and tabular data, aligning with the dataset properties. It also requires high memory and has strengths in utilizing the GPU, both of which are additional requirements for this dataset. Unlike other models, AE1SVM also gracefully handles sparse and imbalanced data, which is not explicitly required but could be beneficial. Its ability to scale to large datasets with short training time makes it an optimal choice for the problem at hand." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and large datasets, which matches the dataset tags. It is also capable of using high memory and has a short training time, which aligns with the 'high memory' requirement. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, making it a good fit given the dataset size is large. Although it may struggle with imbalanced data, this is less prioritized given its other strengths that match the dataset characteristics. Other models either lack scalability, or are not optimized for tabular data, limiting their compatibility with the dataset's nature." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected as the most suitable model because it excels at handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also scalable to large datasets and supports high memory usage, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirements. The short training time is an additional advantage for efficiently processing the large dataset, whereas its capabilities in technology and noisy data domains further support its suitability for the provided dataset context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is highly suitable for the given dataset properties as it has strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, both of which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and can process high memory requirements, which aligns well with the dataset's large size and memory constraints. Furthermore, its capability to manage noisy data is beneficial given the potential presence of noise in high-dimensional agricultural and technology-related data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is a good choice because it is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also handles noisy data effectively and supports GPU acceleration, which are important given the high-memory requirement. Furthermore, ALAD is scalable to large datasets, making it a strong candidate for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it has strong alignment with the dataset characteristics: it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset's high dimensionality and tabular data properties. Moreover, it is suitable considering the high memory requirement and is scalable to large datasets. It also leverages a GPU and offers short training times, making it efficient for processing large datasets with high dimensional complexity, which fit well within the provided dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it handles high-dimensional tabular data efficiently, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets, supports high memory requirements, and offers a short training time, matching the dataset's large size and additional memory constraints. While it may not be ideal for imbalanced data, this is not a specified requirement in the dataset properties, making it an excellent overall choice given the strengths needed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the dataset given its strengths. It is effective with tabular data and high dimensionality, aligning with the dataset's properties. Additionally, AE1SVM handles large datasets with scalability and has high memory capacity, meeting the dataset's requirements for high memory. The model also offers compatibility with GPU and short training time, ensuring efficient processing. Its applicability in the technology domain further complements the dataset's domain specifications. Despite its weakness with noisy data, AE1SVM's strengths in other relevant areas make it the best choice from the provided model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it caters to large tabular datasets with high dimensionality and high memory requirements. It is also scalable to large datasets and benefits from a short training time. Additionally, the strengths of AutoEncoder align with the technology domain, which is part of the dataset characteristics. Despite its weaknesses with imbalanced data, which wasn't highlighted as a concern, the AutoEncoder's strengths make it well-suited for this task over the other models considered." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It handles high dimensional tabular data effectively and is capable of scaling to large datasets, which is essential given the dataset's large size and high dimensionality. Additionally, it supports high memory requirements, making it a good match. Unlike some other models, AE1SVM's strengths do not conflict with any of the dataset tags, and its ability to operate on tabular data specifically aligns well with the characteristics of the dataset provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable for the given dataset properties as it supports tabular data, has strengths in handling high dimensionality, and is scalable to large datasets. It capitalizes on the use of GPU and requires high memory, aligning with the additional requirements stated. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced datasets, this does not directly conflict with the provided dataset tags, making it a viable choice considering the overall strengths relevant to the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It also operates well under high memory conditions and is scalable to large datasets, which fits the requirements of the dataset. Additionally, ALAD aligns with the domain tags such as technology and agriculture. Although it has long training times as a weakness, its strengths align more closely with the dataset properties compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is ideal for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and scalability to large tabular datasets, which match the dataset characteristics. It also efficiently utilizes high memory environments and provides short training times, aligning well with the additional dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is best suited for the dataset as it strongly supports high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the provided dataset tags. It is also scalable to large datasets and leverages GPU and high memory, aligning with the additional requirements. Despite its weakness with noisy data, it still offers short training times and handles sparse and imbalanced data well, making it a robust choice for this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for tabular data and is strong in handling high dimensionality and large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset properties. Additionally, it supports high memory requirements and is scalable to large datasets. Its strengths in technology and imbalanced data further match the domain and characteristics of the dataset. Despite its weakness in handling noisy data, the other strengths outweigh this consideration for the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is best suited for this dataset because it handles high dimensional tabular data effectively. It supports high memory use, making it suitable for large datasets, and has a short training time. It is capable of dealing with noisy data and can be scaled to large datasets. Despite its weaknesses with small data size and imbalanced data, these do not conflict with the dataset properties provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is chosen for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is also scalable to large datasets and supports high memory usage, addressing the dataset's large size and memory requirements. Additionally, the AutoEncoder can manage noisy data and benefits from short training times, making it suitable for the domain of agriculture and technology, while avoiding the weaknesses associated with small data size or imbalanced datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is suitable for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It supports GPU for faster processing, handles high memory requirements, and is scalable to large datasets. Furthermore, it efficiently manages noisy data, which is crucial given the dataset properties. The strengths of AutoEncoder align well with the dataset's characteristics, and it does not have critical weaknesses that would negatively impact its performance for this application." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which align with the dataset characteristics. It also supports high memory usage and is scalable to large datasets, addressing the additional requirement of high memory. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data and small data sizes, these are not primary concerns given the dataset's characteristics of being large and high-dimensional. The alignment with such key dataset properties makes AE1SVM a better choice compared to other models on the list for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is the best choice given the dataset properties: large size, tabular data, high dimensionality, and high memory requirements. It is strong in handling tabular data and high dimensionality and can be implemented on a GPU for scalability to large datasets. The strengths align well with the dataset tags and outweigh the weaknesses, such as long training time and non-scalability, given the dataset's nature and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality with a need for high memory. AutoEncoder is suited for tabular data with high dimensionality and is scalable to large datasets. It also handles noisy data and utilizes high memory efficiently. Additionally, it has a short training time which is beneficial for dealing with large data sizes." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is strong in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, both characteristics of our dataset. It is also capable of working with large datasets and utilizes high memory, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, it has short training times and is scalable to large datasets, making it efficient for the large dataset size. The weaknesses of AutoEncoder, such as its performance on small data sizes or real-time data, are irrelevant, as our focus is on a large tabular dataset. Other models like DevNet and AnoGAN have weaknesses related to tabular data or high memory needs, making them less suitable." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the dataset given its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. It also supports large data sizes and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset requirements. Moreover, it is scalable to large datasets and benefits from using GPU, which is advantageous in this use case. Although it might struggle with noisy data, the other strengths outweigh this weakness for the given dataset context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the best choice for this dataset because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also supports high memory requirements and is scalable to large datasets, fitting well with the dataset's tags. Additionally, it offers short training times and is optimized for noisy data, making it suitable for applications in agriculture and technology." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It has strengths in handling high dimensional data, adapting to tabular data, and leveraging high memory resources efficiently, along with a capacity for managing large datasets. The model's strengths in technology-related domains further support its suitability. Despite the weakness in handling discrete or categorical data, which is not a primary concern here, VAE aligns well with the dataset's tags and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the best choice for this dataset as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data efficiently, which are crucial for the given dataset's characteristics. It is designed to work well with large datasets and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. The AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which makes it suitable for large-scale applications in domains like agriculture and technology that are mentioned in the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it handles tabular data with high dimensionality effectively. It scales well to large datasets and supports high memory requirements. Moreover, it has a short training time and is compatible with noisy data, aligning well with the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "The ALAD model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and model analyses. The dataset is characterized by large size, tabular data, high dimensionality, and a need for high memory capacity. ALAD's strengths align well with these properties, including handling tabular and high-dimensional data, support for large datasets, and high memory capability. Despite long training times, its scalability, suitability for large datasets, and capability in handling high dimensionality make it the most appropriate option among the provided models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which matches the characteristics of the provided dataset. It supports tabular data, high dimensionality, requires high memory, and is scalable to large datasets, making it an excellent choice for the dataset tags provided. Additionally, AE1SVM has strengths in technology and can handle the data characteristics well without any major weaknesses impacting its performance for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It handles tabular data well, which matches the dataset type. The large data size can be managed efficiently since AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets. It performs well with high dimensionality and requires high memory, which fits the characteristics of the dataset. The model also offers short training time, which is advantageous in working with large datasets and ensures efficient model deployment in technological applications." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset description indicating high memory requirements and large data size. Its strengths include the ability to handle high dimensionality, tabular data, and scalability to large datasets, all key aspects of this dataset. While it may not perform as well with noisy data, it aligns with most of the dataset characteristics, making it the best overall fit from the model list provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality and high memory requirements. Unlike other models, it specifically excels in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and is scalable to large datasets with strengths in technology domains. It also leverages GPU which is beneficial for large datasets and complex computations, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics. While it does struggle with real-time and noisy data, these are not the prominent concerns for the given dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset properties with its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is capable of handling large datasets with high memory requirements. AE1SVM's scalability makes it appropriate for the large data size specified. Despite its weakness in dealing with noise, the dataset doesn't emphasize this requirement, making AE1SVM the best fit among the available model choices." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The AE1SVM model is the most suitable for the provided dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which match the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, AE1SVM is capable of utilizing high memory resources and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset requirements. Its weaknesses are not directly impactful given the dataset properties, making it a fitting choice compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and large datasets, which align with the dataset properties. It also supports high memory usage, making it ideal given the additional memory requirements. AE1SVM's capability to handle sparse and imbalanced data further contributes to its suitability, despite the current dataset not explicitly mentioning these characteristics. Its short training time and scalability to large datasets add to its advantages, aligning well with the dataset's large size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset consists of large tabular data with high dimensionality and high memory requirements. The AutoEncoder is well-suited for this dataset as it is designed to handle tabular data and high dimensionality. It also supports large datasets with scalable architecture and benefits from the usage of GPUs. Its short training time further adds to its effectiveness given the dataset's large size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. It also handles high memory requirements and is scalable to large datasets, making it a robust choice for the dataset described. Additionally, it supports GPU acceleration and has a relatively short training time, further enhancing its suitability for this use case. Despite potential limitations with noisy data, its overall strengths align well with the dataset's needs in agriculture and technology domains." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is best suited for this dataset due to its strengths. It is capable of handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. Moreover, it is scalable to large datasets and supports high memory requirements. Additionally, it has a short training time, making it efficient for handling large datasets. Its capability to leverage GPU enhances its scalability further. While it does not deal well with noisy data, this is not a constraint of the dataset based on the given tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, aligning with the dataset's properties. It handles high dimensionality effectively and supports GPU usage for better performance on large datasets. Furthermore, its capacity for high memory usage and short training time makes it apt for the described requirements. Despite the dataset's large size, the AutoEncoder's scalability to large datasets and its ability to handle noisy data and high-dimensional features make it the most suitable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. Moreover, it is designed to handle high memory requirements, leverage GPU, and offer a scalable solution for large datasets, while also performing well with technology domain data. Its strengths align closely with the dataset requirements, particularly its ability to manage noisy data and deliver short training times, which are beneficial for efficient processing of extensive agricultural and technological data collections." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The AE1SVM model is the most suitable choice as it aligns well with the dataset properties and requirements. It excels with high dimensionality, tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets, matching the dataset's characteristics. It supports high memory usage, which is a requirement for this dataset, and offers short training times which is beneficial given the large data size. Although AE1SVM does not handle noisy data well, this drawback is less impactful given its overall alignment with other critical dataset properties and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is particularly well-suited for the given dataset as it supports high dimensional tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets, aligns with the requirement of high memory usage, and offers short training time which is crucial for processing large datasets efficiently. Additionally, AE1SVM handles high dimensionality effectively and is suitable for domains like technology, which is one of the domains mentioned in the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is best suited for this dataset because it effectively handles tabular data, high dimensionality, and large datasets, which are all relevant features of the provided dataset. Additionally, it supports high memory usage and has a short training time, making it well-suited for handling large-scale problems in the technology and agriculture domains. Its compatibility with GPU further enhances its scalability and efficiency for high-dimensional and large-size datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, high-dimensional, and requires high memory utilization. AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data, scales well to large datasets, and handles high dimensionality efficiently. It also supports high memory requirements and provides short training time, making it a fitting choice given the dataset's characteristics and additional needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and the requirement for high memory, which aligns with the dataset's tags. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, has a short training time, and supports the use of GPUs. These strengths make it the most appropriate choice for the large, high-dimensional, tabular dataset, while other models have weaknesses such as long training times or being less suited for high memory usage that are not aligned with the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is capable of handling tabular data and high dimensionality, both characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is well-suited for large datasets and high memory requirements, aligning well with the dataset's description. The model's strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and capability of leveraging GPUs further support its selection. While it is not the best choice for imbalanced data, this dataset characteristic is not mentioned, making the AutoEncoder a rational choice considering the given context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable for this dataset as it supports high dimensional and tabular data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also utilizes GPU and can handle large datasets with high memory requirements, aligning with the dataset's properties. Additionally, AutoEncoder has a short training time, making it efficient for large datasets, and it does not have a limitation on high memory, unlike some other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it excels in handling high dimensionality, supports tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets. Additionally, it is optimized for high memory usage, which aligns with the dataset's requirements. Although it is weak in dealing with noisy data, no model perfectly fits all dataset characteristics, and AE1SVM's overall compatibility with the provided dataset properties makes it the most appropriate choice from the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, as well as large datasets which require high memory, aligning perfectly with the dataset tags. It also handles noisy data effectively and has short training time, making it a robust choice despite its weaknesses with small data size and real-time data, which are not applicable concerns in this scenario." + } + ], + "vertebral": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties because it is capable of handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also performs well with noisy data, aligning with the dataset's noise characteristic. Despite the data's small size, VAE's strengths in the healthcare domain and short training time make it an ideal choice. Although it does not specifically cater to low memory requirements, it does sufficiently align with other critical dataset needs, especially in handling tabular and noisy data effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for this task as it handles tabular data well and is specifically strong in healthcare applications, where medical data is typically used. It is proficient in dealing with noisy data, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Although it is generally better for larger datasets, VAE's short training time makes it a good option given the need for low memory usage. Other models either do not perform well with small datasets, noisy data, or tabular data, making VAE the most balanced choice given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data, which is a primary characteristic of the dataset provided. It handles noisy data effectively, a key dataset characteristic, and performs adequately on small datasets. Although its weakness is in using high memory, the 'low memory' requirement doesn't disqualify it as significantly as it does other models. The VAE's compatibility with tabular, medical data and capability to manage noisy datasets makes it the most appropriate choice given the constraints and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset because it effectively handles tabular data and healthcare domains, both of which are relevant to this dataset. Additionally, VAE is known for its strength in dealing with noisy data, a key characteristic of the provided dataset, and it is optimized for short training times, which is beneficial for small datasets requiring low memory usage. While VAE does have weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, the other characteristics align well with the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is suitable for tabular data, healthcare (medical domain), and handles noisy data well. Despite the dataset being small, VAE does not have explicit weaknesses in handling small data size compared to other models in the list. Additionally, it doesn't require low memory, but it compensates by offering short training time and the ability to handle noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it is suitable for tabular data and healthcare domains, can handle noisy data, and requires short training time. Despite its weakness with small data sizes, it generally aligns well with the data characteristics given the available options. Other models either have significant weaknesses with tabular data or noisy data, or require high memory capacity that the dataset cannot accommodate." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable for small tabular datasets within the medical domain, handling noisy data effectively. Despite high memory requirements, it offers short training times and is appropriate for healthcare applications, making it the best match for the given dataset\u2019s characteristics, especially when no other model from the list supports both small data sizes and noisy environments without substantial weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is best suited for the provided dataset because it supports tabular data and is applicable to the medical domain. VAE handles noisy data effectively, which is a key characteristic of the dataset, and it trains relatively quickly. Although it is typically designed for larger datasets, it can still function on small datasets if the noise handling capability is critical. The model's downsides, such as issues with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, do not significantly conflict with the dataset properties. Additionally, while VAE tends to require higher memory, it is more flexible compared to other models which explicitly highlight low memory and small data size as weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data in the medical domain with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite being suboptimal for small data sizes, it possesses strengths in handling tabular, healthcare-focused datasets with noise, making it the best candidate compared to others in the list. It also benefits from short training times and is scalable to large datasets, which could be advantageous if the dataset grows. Additionally, its reliance on GPU rather than CPU aligns well with the dataset needs related to memory and computational considerations." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is suitable for tabular data, healthcare (medical domain), and can handle noisy data, matching the dataset's properties of being small, tabular, noisy, and in the medical domain. Although it requires high memory, it is well suited for small data sizes unlike other available models that strongly disfavor small datasets. It also has a short training time, fulfilling the low memory requirement as best as possible from the given options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. The dataset is small, consists of tabular data related to the medical domain, and may contain noise. VAE strengths include handling tabular data, healthcare applications, and dealing with noisy data. Additionally, it has a short training time, which meets the low memory requirement. While it isn't optimal for small datasets, no model perfectly meets all of the dataset tags, and the advantages of VAE align more closely with the dataset requirements than the other options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is most suitable for small, noisy, tabular medical datasets with low memory requirements. Its strengths include handling tabular data, healthcare applications, and noisy data effectively. Although it requires high memory, it has the advantage of short training time and scalability to large datasets, which compensates for the dataset's low memory constraint. Other models with strengths in handling noisy data or medical datasets have weaknesses regarding small data sizes or tabular data that the VAE doesn't have." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and healthcare domains, which aligns with the dataset properties. It handles noisy data effectively and has a short training time, which is beneficial given the requirement for low memory usage. Despite being better suited for larger datasets, its strengths closely match the dataset characteristics more than other models on the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable choice for a small dataset of tabular data in the medical domain characterized by noisy data, with additional requirements of low memory usage. The VAE model's strengths include handling tabular data and noisy data effectively, both of which are key characteristics of the provided dataset. Though it generally operates with high memory, for small datasets like the one described, it should still manage memory constraints better than other options, making it the best fit compared to other models listed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It is effective for handling noisy data, a characteristic of the dataset. Even though VAE requires high memory, which is a potential issue given the low memory requirement, its strengths in handling small datasets with short training time, particularly in the medical domain, outweigh this drawback. Other models have more critical weaknesses for this context, such as poor performance with tabular data or longer training times that do not align with the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is recommended as it supports tabular data, can handle noisy data, and is suitable for healthcare domain applications. While it requires high memory, its capability to manage noisy and high-dimensional data makes it a better fit for the given dataset characteristics compared to the other models listed. Despite the data size being small, VAE's aptness for healthcare and robustness against noise make it the most balanced choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for small, noisy, tabular medical data, as it specifically lists tabular data, healthcare, and noisy data as its strengths. Despite its need for high memory, it is the only model in the list that adequately balances the requirement for handling both tabular data and noise effectively. While some weaknesses include potential high memory usage, the dataset's other needs align well with VAE's capabilities compared to other models, making it the best overall choice given the low-memory constraint is not as heavily emphasized in the dataset tags as other characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is chosen because it is effective with tabular data, particularly in the healthcare domain, and can handle noisy data which is a characteristic of the dataset. Despite its vulnerability to high memory usage and requiring careful hyperparameter tuning, it has a short training time suitable for small datasets and provides GPU acceleration. This aligns well with the dataset's small size, noisiness, low memory requirement, and the medical domain specification." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for small tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset properties. Its ability to handle healthcare data, short training time, and good performance on noisy tabular data make it a strong candidate. Although it requires high memory, its strengths align well with the primary requirements of the dataset such as handling noisy data and tabular format, and it will perform adequately despite the dataset size being small." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is the best choice for this dataset because it supports tabular data and excels in handling noisy data, which aligns with the characteristics of the dataset. Furthermore, it is relevant in the medical domain and has a short training time, making it suitable for a small dataset that requires low memory usage. Despite its minor weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, VAE's high dimensionality capabilities and efficient performance on noisy data make it the most suitable model from the provided list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model given the dataset's characteristics. The dataset is small, comprises tabular data from a medical domain, and contains noisy data. VAE has strengths in handling both tabular and noisy data and is commonly applied in healthcare domains. While it uses high memory, which is a minor concern, it compensates with its short training time, making it a viable option under low memory conditions. None of the weaknesses of the VAE, like issues with discrete data or requiring well-tuned hyperparameters, are highly problematic for this dataset, making it the best fit among the given models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable because it handles tabular data and noisy data well, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is also noted for performing effectively in the healthcare domain, which is relevant to this dataset's medical domain. Although VAE requires high memory, it has a short training time, making it more feasible for small datasets compared to the other models. Overall, VAE appears to be the best fit given the dataset properties and model analyses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for small tabular medical datasets with noisy data. Its strengths include handling of tabular data, healthcare domain applicability, and robustness to noisy data, aligning well with the dataset's properties. While VAE typically requires high memory, its compatibility with noisy data and short training time make it a better fit compared to other models, given the constraints of the dataset, especially in terms of memory efficiency and data compatibility." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for the provided dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and healthcare domains, which align with the dataset's characteristics. It is also capable of dealing with noisy data, which is a key property of the dataset. Although VAE typically requires high memory, it has a short training time which mitigates this constraint to some extent in a small dataset context. Among the listed models, VAE aligns most closely with the dataset needs, particularly focusing on tabular, medical data, and noise resiliency." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the best choice given the dataset's properties and the model's characteristics. It is well-suited for handling tabular data and performs efficiently with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Although not optimal for small data sizes, it handles healthcare and medical domains effectively, which is a critical factor given the dataset's domain. Furthermore, VAE has a comparatively short training time and is optimized for noisy data, making it suitable for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it performs well on tabular data, handles noisy data effectively, and has strengths in the healthcare domain. Although it usually requires high memory, it has a short training time, making it relatively efficient. While VAE works well on large datasets, it doesn't explicitly have weaknesses related to small datasets in the context provided, unlike others in the list. Thus, it aligns well with your requirement for low memory alongside handling tabular medical data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and healthcare domains, as well as its ability to manage noisy data effectively. It has strengths in high dimensionality and short training time, which align with the dataset's characteristics. Although VAE requires high memory, its strengths outweigh its weaknesses compared to other models in the list, especially since it supports short training times on small, noisy datasets in a medical domain." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model as it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics and requirements. It is effective with tabular data and can handle noisy data, which is critical for the medical domain with potentially noisy inputs. While not optimized for small data sizes, it offers advantages like short training time, which aligns with low memory constraints. The VAE's strengths in handling healthcare-specific data further support its selection in this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data, healthcare-related datasets, and noisy data, which matches the characteristics of the given dataset. It also supports short training times and works well with high-dimensional datasets. Although it requires high memory, the short training time and its ability to handle noisy and tabular data make it a good choice for small datasets, especially in the medical domain, despite the dataset's low memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is best suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, healthcare, and noisy data. It is capable of working with small datasets and offers short training time. Although it requires high memory, it aligns well with the domain (medical) and data characteristics (noisy data) while also effectively handling tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice as it supports tabular data and can handle noisy data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It is also commonly used in the healthcare domain, and while it has high memory requirements, the dataset being 'small' helps mitigate this disadvantage. Additionally, the VAE's ability to work with small datasets and short training time makes it a viable option given the requirement for low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is best suited given the dataset properties and model characteristics. It performs well on tabular data and specifically caters to applications in healthcare, aligning well with the medical domain tag. It is capable of handling noisy data, a notable characteristic of the dataset. VAE also offers a short training time, which is advantageous for efficient model deployment. Despite its high memory requirement, it is the most appropriate choice from the list, considering the absence of better-matching models for small datasets with low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data, healthcare, and can handle noisy data, which fits the dataset's characteristics. Even though VAE typically benefits from larger datasets, its compatibility with tabular data, short training time, and ability to manage noise make it a reasonable choice for a small, noisy medical dataset. Additionally, it can work in a low memory environment and requires less computational power compared to some other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is selected due to its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset properties. Despite the small data size being a minor drawback, VAE's capabilities in healthcare and its suitability for low memory environments make it the best fit among the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data and handles noisy data well, which are critical for this medical dataset. It also includes strengths like short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory requirement. Despite needing higher memory generally, VAE\u2019s ability to work on small datasets in healthcare and its capability with tabular data makes it the most appropriate choice considering the dataset's properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a suitable choice because it handles tabular data well, which is crucial given the dataset type. It also addresses noisy data, a characteristic of the dataset, and is recognized for short training times that align well with the low memory requirement. Although it has a weakness with discrete or categorical data, this is not highlighted as a dataset property, allowing VAE's strengths to be leveraged effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is chosen because it is strong in handling tabular data and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its high memory requirements, VAE offers high utility in medical domains and is known for its short training time, making it a suitable choice for a small dataset size while managing noisy data effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for small tabular datasets with noisy data and limited memory requirements. It also caters well to medical applications, which aligns with the dataset domain. The model's strengths in handling tabular data, healthcare applications, and noisy data, combined with short training time, make it the most appropriate choice given the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the best choice due to its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, both of which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, VAE is suitable for small data sizes, has a short training time, and can operate with low memory requirements despite its high-memory strength, making it apt for the given low-memory constraint. Although it has weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data, the overall fit with the dataset characteristics outweighs this issue." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is suitable for the given dataset properties as it is strong with tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It effectively handles noisy data, a key characteristic of the dataset. Even though it has high memory requirements, which is a potential issue, its strengths align well with the requirements of handling small medical datasets in a tabular format." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, which are aspects of the given dataset. Additionally, it is well-suited for small data sizes, unlike many other models in the list that have weaknesses in handling small datasets. Although VAE typically requires high memory, its strengths in short training times and capability to handle high dimensionality make it the best fit among the options provided, especially when 'low memory' is a constraint, as none of the models perfectly meet this requirement while also being favorable for small and noisy tabular datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is small, tabular, and noisy, requiring a model that can handle these characteristics while also having low memory requirements. VAE is strong with tabular data, noisy data, and noisy healthcare-related datasets, and has a short training time, which fits the small dataset criterion well. While it has a high memory requirement, it is the most suitable choice given the other models have more significant weaknesses for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is well-suited for small, tabular datasets often found in medical domains and performs effectively with noisy data. It has strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, which aligns well with the characteristics of the provided dataset. While VAE does have high memory usage, it compensates with short training times, making it relatively efficient even with memory constraints. Other models either lack support for small datasets or tabular data, or have pronounced weaknesses in handling noisy data effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It supports tabular data and is effective with noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset's primary characteristics. While VAE typically requires high memory resources, its short training time and compatibility with medical domain make it a viable option for a small dataset with low memory requirements. Among the listed models, VAE provides a balance between handling noise and being efficient on small datasets in the medical domain." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It can handle noisy data, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Despite high memory requirements being a weakness, VAE's strengths in short training time and its ability to work with small data sizes, make it a better fit than other models. Most importantly, VAE specifically mentions strengths in healthcare, aligning with the domain of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected as it supports tabular data, is well-suited for healthcare and noisy data contexts, and offers short training times. While it does favor high memory, it balances this by aligning with the requirement to handle noisy data and tabular formats effectively, making it a better choice over other models that have specific limitations related to small data sizes or low memory capabilities." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it effectively handles tabular data and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Although it requires high memory, it is suitable for small data sizes in healthcare domains, aligning well with the dataset's medical tag. It also supports efficient training times, making it compatible with the additional requirement of low memory usage in this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and healthcare domains, and it handles noisy data effectively, which matches the dataset properties. Additionally, it has a short training time and is manageable with small datasets despite its weaknesses, which contrasts with other models that have more limiting factors given the dataset's requirements. Although VAE requires high memory, its ability to handle the given dataset's primary characteristics makes it the most appropriate choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable for the small, noisy, tabular medical dataset with low memory requirements. It has strengths in handling tabular data with noisy data in healthcare domains, which matches the dataset characteristics. Although it requires high memory and might not be optimal for low memory environments, it otherwise matches the dataset tags better than other models, which have more severe weaknesses or are less aligned with the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is well-suited for the given dataset because it handles tabular data and healthcare/medical data effectively, which matches the domain and data type of the dataset. It specifically handles noisy data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Furthermore, despite the small data size being a general weakness for many models, VAE offers a short training time, which can mitigate issues with small datasets. Although it generally requires high memory, it balances this with the ability to process noisy, high-dimensional tabular data efficiently, making it the best match from the given model list." + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/examples/auto_model_selection_example/without_note_selection_results/output.json b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/without_note_selection_results/output.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d0749033 --- /dev/null +++ b/examples/auto_model_selection_example/without_note_selection_results/output.json @@ -0,0 +1,3436 @@ +{ + "pima": [ + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it handles tabular and imbalanced data well, which aligns with the dataset properties. Although it is weak with noisy data, the low memory requirement and ability to scale to larger datasets make it a suitable choice given the medium data size and low memory requirement of the dataset. LUNAR also has a short training time, which is advantageous. Other models either require high memory or have significant weaknesses in dealing with tabular or imbalanced data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it effectively handles tabular and imbalanced data, which are primary characteristics of the dataset. It also operates well under low memory constraints, which is a vital requirement. Although it has limitations with noisy data, it is scalable, offers short training times, and strengths that fit the given dataset characteristics better than other models. Given the trade-offs, LUNAR's short training time and scalability make it the most suitable model given the dataset's conditions." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It handles imbalanced and tabular data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Despite its weakness with noisy data, it is better suited compared to the other models because it supports imbalanced data, which is a critical factor. Additionally, it is well-optimized for high dimensionality and can handle sparse data, both potentially beneficial for medium-sized datasets. While there is a trade-off with some of the dataset requirements like low memory, its strengths in relevant dataset characteristics make it the best candidate from the given model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it handles tabular data and imbalanced datasets effectively. Although it isn't optimized for noisy data, it excels in other necessary conditions like handling medium-sized datasets, which align with the dataset's characteristics. It supports GPU for better performance while managing high dimensionality and short training times, albeit with a higher memory requirement. Given that many other models struggle significantly with either tabular or imbalanced data, AE1SVM provides the best fit from the options available considering the needs for low memory and imbalanced, noisy data handling." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is best suited for this dataset because it specifically handles tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It is also efficient in terms of memory usage, making it appropriate given the additional requirement for low memory. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, it remains the best option among the available models considering its overall strengths in the context of the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset characteristics include medium-sized, tabular, imbalanced, and noisy data with a requirement for low memory. Among the given models, VAE is suitable because it supports tabular data and handles noisy data well. While VAE has weaknesses with imbalanced data, it is one of the few models that match tabular and noisy data needs. Also, it has efficient scalability and relatively short training times, accommodating the medium-sized data constraint. Although it has a high memory requirement, it balances the dataset's needs better than alternative models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is specifically designed for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is capable of handling imbalanced data which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR has low memory requirements, fulfilling the additional requirements of low memory usage. While it is sensitive to hyperparameter tuning, its strengths closely align with the main characteristics of the dataset, making it an appropriate choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it demonstrates strengths with tabular and imbalanced data, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also handles sparse data efficiently and offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, meeting the 'low memory' requirement. Despite its weakness with noisy data, it is the best fit among the options provided, balancing memory constraints and data requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties and constraints. It is explicitly designed to handle tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which are key characteristics of the dataset. LUNAR also offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which fits well with the medium data size requirement. Additionally, it supports imbalanced data effectively. Although it has weaknesses like sensitivity to noisy data and high memory requirements, it aligns better with the dataset's need for a low memory model when compared to other models on the list. Overall, LUNAR balances the requirements for handling tabular, imbalanced data efficiently while ensuring scalability and reasonable resource usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data, which matches the data type in the dataset. It also handles noisy data effectively, which is important given the dataset's characteristics. Although the dataset is imbalanced, ALAD's flexibility in handling both noisy and sparse data makes it a viable option. ALAD can also run on a GPU, aligning with the low memory requirement and scalability needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is most suitable for this medium-sized tabular dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular and imbalanced data while meeting the low memory requirement and having a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data, it can effectively manage the imbalanced nature of the dataset and is scalable to large datasets, which makes it a good overall fit given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is chosen because it supports tabular data and can handle both noisy and imbalanced datasets, which are critical characteristics of the dataset. Despite its high memory requirement, ALAD's capability for scalability to large datasets and its proficiency in handling noisy data align well with the dataset's medium size and noisy nature. While it requires high memory, it does not have the low memory constraint as a primary weakness, unlike some other models in the list. Overall, ALAD offers a suitable balance between addressing noisy and imbalanced data while being compatible with tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected as the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, which are important characteristics of the given dataset. It also supports large datasets, which aligns well with the medium data size. Although it has a weakness with imbalanced data, which is present in the dataset, other models such as AutoEncoder could have been suitable but are hindered by their weakness with imbalanced data to a greater degree. VAE's ability to handle high dimensionality and to train quickly with GPU support are additional advantages, despite the weakness in handling imbalanced data, making it a balanced choice given these constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is chosen because it handles tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset type. It is also capable of dealing with noisy data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Although it requires high memory and has a long training time, it addresses the main challenges of imbalanced and noisy data, which are crucial for this dataset. Other models either do not support tabular data well or perform poorly with noisy and imbalanced datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is well-suited for tabular data and can handle noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset. Although it requires high memory, its ability to scale to large datasets and handle imbalanced data make it a favorable option given the medium data size and specific focus. Additionally, it effectively supports high-dimensionality data and noisy contexts, which are critical considering the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the best choice for the given dataset properties because it handles tabular data effectively and supports imbalanced datasets, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also requires lower memory and offers short training time, addressing the additional low memory requirement. While it has weaknesses with noisy data, these concerns are outweighed by its strengths in handling imbalanced tabular datasets with a low memory constraint." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it is strong in handling tabular data, which fits the dataset's data type. Additionally, it supports noisy data, which is another characteristic of the dataset. It handles imbalanced data and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset's imbalanced and medium size nature. ALAD's weaknesses are not highly relevant as they pertain to areas like small data sizes or specific data types (e.g., time series, audio) that aren't part of the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data, particularly given the imbalanced nature of the dataset. Although it has some weaknesses with noisy data, it effectively handles imbalanced and sparse data, which is crucial here. AE1SVM also supports high dimensionality and has a short training time, making it appropriate for datasets with low memory requirements. Given the dataset\u2019s characteristics and the model's strengths, AE1SVM emerges as the most suitable choice among the options listed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It is well-suited for tabular data and performs effectively on imbalanced datasets, which is a key characteristic of the provided dataset. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the need for low memory usage. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, its strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data, combined with its compatibility with tabular formats, make it the best option despite the presence of noise in the data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular data and imbalanced datasets, matching the dataset's characteristics. It offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is ideal given the medium data size and low memory requirement. Although it has a weakness with noisy data, other models are much less suited for imbalanced tabular data with low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is chosen because it has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is one of the key dataset characteristics. It also supports GPU and has a short training time, addressing the need for low memory usage. Although it has some weaknesses with noisy data, its other strengths align better with the dataset requirements compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the best choice given the dataset properties as it excels in handling tabular data, imbalance, and short training time, which aligns with the medium-sized and imbalanced nature of the dataset. It is computationally efficient, suitable for low memory requirements, and handles imbalanced data effectively, despite its minor weakness in dealing with noisy data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it effectively handles imbalanced and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. While the dataset is medium in size, AE1SVM supports high dimensionality and short training time which compensates for the medium data size. Additionally, it addresses the need for low memory usage. Although it struggles with noisy data, its other strengths align better with the dataset properties compared to the other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it is designed to handle tabular data effectively. It is also particularly strong with imbalanced data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Furthermore, LUNAR operates with low memory usage and offers short training time, making it compatible with the dataset's additional low memory requirement. Despite its weakness in dealing with noisy data, the model's advantages align better with the dataset's needs compared to other models, making it the best option among the given models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it aligns well with the dataset characteristics and requirements. It is designed for tabular data and has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets, has a short training time, and utilizes GPU, aligning with the dataset's medium size and need for low memory usage. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data, its strengths in other areas make it the most suitable model from the list given these constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it is designed to handle tabular data effectively, which is a key characteristic of the current dataset. It is also capable of managing noisy data, which is crucial given the dataset's noisy nature. While ALAD typically requires high memory, this weakness is less severe compared to the incompatibility of other models with imbalanced and tabular data, which are primary requirements here. Moreover, ALAD is scalable to large datasets, accommodates high dimensionality, and its strength in dealing with sparse data is an advantage for the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it is strong in handling imbalanced and tabular data, which fits the dataset tags. Despite its weakness with noisy data and low memory requirements, it has the strengths needed in this medium-sized dataset, including short training time and scalability to large datasets. These characteristics outweigh its weaknesses compared to other models, which either struggle significantly with imbalanced data or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is chosen because it effectively handles tabular data and is robust to imbalanced data, which are critical factors given the dataset characteristics. It also supports high dimensionality and has short training time, which is advantageous for handling noisy data. While AE1SVM has weaknesses related to low memory, the strength in handling imbalanced data in tabular form outweighs this drawback for the dataset at hand." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The AE1SVM model is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling imbalanced and tabular data, aligning well with the dataset characteristics. It also supports high dimensionality, which can be beneficial in managing the noisy data present in the dataset. Despite its weaknesses in dealing with noisy data, the additional requirement of scalability to medium data size and high-pass memory utilization align with the AE1SVM model strengths. Among models focusing on tabular and imbalanced data, AE1SVM appears to be the most compatible given the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it is highly suitable for tabular data and imbalanced datasets, both being key characteristics of the given dataset. It also excels in handling sparse data, which can be useful if the dataset has many missing values. Furthermore, LUNAR offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which can effectively manage a medium data size while fulfilling the requirement of low memory usage compared to alternatives. Although LUNAR has a weakness for high memory usage, it is compensated by its scalability and ability to deal with imbalanced data without being overly sensitive to noise." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it handles tabular data well and is robust against imbalanced datasets, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data and low memory, it efficiently processes high dimensional and imbalanced data, making it a suitable choice considering the dataset properties of being medium-sized, with tabular, imbalanced, and noisy attributes. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the requirement for low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected as it aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It specifically handles tabular and imbalanced data effectively while requiring low memory usage, all fitting within the medium-sized dataset requirement. Although LUNAR has a weakness with noisy data, its strengths in handling tabular and imbalanced data combined with short training time make it a suitable choice given the dataset's constraints and features." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for this dataset because it handles tabular data and imbalanced data well, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It performs well with high dimensionality and is supportive of short training times. Additionally, AE1SVM is capable of managing large datasets effectively, although memory usage might be a potential concern, it aligns with the need for low memory solutions better than the other options. While it does have a weakness with noisy data, the combination of strengths for this specific dataset makes it the most suitable choice from the list provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for the given dataset as it handles tabular and imbalanced data effectively, matches the requirement for low memory usage, and offers short training times, which is beneficial given the medium dataset size. While it struggles with noisy data, other models have more critical weaknesses against the dataset requirements, such as high memory demands or incompatibility with tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is most suitable for the given dataset as it excels with tabular and imbalanced data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also handles high dimensionality well, which is beneficial for noisy data. Despite its weakness with low memory requirements, it strikes a good balance between dealing with noisy and imbalanced data compared to other models. Additionally, its strength in short training time and ability to scale to large datasets align well with the medium-sized dataset needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data and can handle imbalanced datasets effectively, matching the dataset's characteristics. It also features short training time and low memory usage, which satisfies the additional requirement for low memory. While it has weaknesses with noisy data, no model perfectly handles all dataset characteristics, and LUNAR offers a balance of strengths that are aligned with the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it handles imbalanced data and performs well on tabular data, which fits the dataset characteristics. Its strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and sparse data also align with the dataset needs. Despite its weakness against noisy data, which is a factor, AE1SVM does not have low memory issues like some alternatives and has a short training time, meeting the low memory and medium data size requirements effectively compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling imbalanced and tabular data, both of which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is designed for use with high dimensionality data and performs well under conditions with imbalanced data, aligning with the dataset characteristics. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data, this trade-off is mitigated by its short training time and scalability to large datasets, which are advantageous for a medium-sized dataset with low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is well-suited for the given dataset properties. It excels with tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and is specifically designed for imbalanced data, which is one of the key characteristics of the dataset. LUNAR also supports short training time and is scalable to large datasets, addressing the need for low memory usage. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data, its strengths align more closely with the dataset requirements compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice because it supports tabular data and handles imbalanced data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data, other models either lack support for imbalanced or tabular data or require high memory, which the dataset constraints do not support. Despite its high memory requirement, AE1SVM is capable of handling high dimensionality and is scalable to medium-sized datasets, making it a good fit overall." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, imbalanced, and contains noisy data with low memory requirements. LUNAR excels with tabular and imbalanced data, meeting the core needs of the dataset and operates in low memory environments. While it has a weakness with noisy data, its efficiency with imbalanced and tabular data, coupled with short training times and scalability, makes it the best choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, addresses imbalanced data, and works well with low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset's medium size and imbalanced nature. Although it has weaknesses concerning noisy data and high memory, its strengths in handling imbalanced data and short training time demonstrate good compatibility with the dataset's low memory requirement. Other models either have more severe weaknesses related to tabular data, imbalanced data, or noisy data, or require high memory resources." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is chosen because it is strong in handling tabular data and noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. Despite the imbalanced data challenge, ALAD is one of the models suitable for medium-sized and noisy tabular datasets. Its ability to scale to large datasets and GPU compatibility, coupled with a match for imbalanced data, makes it more suitable than others for this context. While others like VAE struggle with imbalanced data, and models like LUNAR cannot handle noisy data well, ALAD offers a balanced strength for the requirements, despite its occasional high memory use, which was a lesser priority." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the best choice given the dataset properties and model characteristics. It is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR can handle imbalanced data effectively, an important characteristic of the dataset. It also operates efficiently on medium-sized data sets that need low memory, offering scalability to larger datasets with short training times. While LUNAR has a weakness in handling noisy data, this is a minor drawback compared to other models which have more severe limitations with core requirements like imbalanced data or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It is also ideal for medium-sized datasets, which likely aligns with the 'medium' tag specified for the data size. Additionally, LUNAR supports short training times and scalability to large datasets, which compensates for the requirement of low memory, making it a more feasible option under the given constraints. Despite its weakness with noisy data, it balances out with other dataset requirements better than the other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is well-suited for imbalanced data and supports short training times, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data, it is the best option among the given models due to its strength with imbalanced datasets and tabular data format. While it doesn't explicitly list low memory usage as a strength, it does not have high memory as a listed requirement, unlike some other models. Additionally, it supports medium to large datasets, which fits the dataset size requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable selection considering the dataset properties and model characteristics. It excels in handling tabular and imbalanced data, which are key dataset characteristics. It also supports low-memory usage, a critical requirement in this scenario. Despite its weakness in handling noisy data, its strong ability to scale to large datasets with a short training time and effective handling of tabular and imbalanced data makes it the best fit among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties because it is specifically strong with tabular data and can handle imbalanced datasets, which are key characteristics of the dataset in question. Additionally, LUNAR offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, aligning with the requirement for low memory usage. Although it struggles with noisy data, among the options, its strengths in handling imbalanced tabular data make it a better choice than others with more significant weaknesses with respect to the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is effective with tabular data and handles imbalanced data well, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, LUNAR is optimized for low memory usage and has a short training time, which meets the additional dataset requirement for low memory consumption. While it has a potential weakness with noisy data, its strengths and alignment with other dataset needs make it the best choice from the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it effectively handles tabular and imbalanced data, which are the primary characteristics of the dataset. Despite having a weakness with noisy data, AE1SVM is strong in addressing imbalanced datasets and tabular data, making it a better fit compared to other models that struggle more significantly with these dataset attributes. While it does require high memory, the dataset's low memory requirement is a common issue across most models, and AE1SVM compensates with its scalability to large datasets and suitability for medium-sized tabular data." + } + ], + "cardio": [ + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset because it excels in handling tabular and imbalanced data, which are key characteristics of the dataset, and it is designed to work efficiently with a CPU. Additionally, it has the advantage of short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it well-suited for the medium-sized data. While it has weaknesses such as being computationally intensive, its strengths align more closely with the dataset's requirements compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is best suited for tabular data and is effective for imbalanced datasets, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the medium-sized dataset and the requirement for CPU use. Although it has some weaknesses, these do not conflict significantly with the dataset's properties, making it the most appropriate choice among the given options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable choice as it is designed to handle imbalanced data effectively and is suitable for tabular data. Despite its reliance on GPU for strength, it can be performant on CPU as well if the data size is medium, as in this case. While it has limited scalability, the dataset is of medium size, which aligns well with its capabilities. Although some weaknesses were mentioned, none directly conflict with the dataset tags or additional requirements provided, making it more apt than other models on the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is chosen because it excels in handling imbalanced data, which is a critical characteristic of the dataset. Although it has a weakness in dealing with noisy data and real-time data (which are not part of the dataset tags), it effectively addresses the needs of tabular data as well. The model also benefits from a short training time, which is advantageous when CPU is an additional requirement. Despite its limited scalability, the medium-sized dataset should fit within its capabilities." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable model given the dataset properties as it is strong in handling imbalanced data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. While it is noted for strengths with GPUs, it also offers short training times, which can help alleviate potential CPU constraints. Although its weakness includes limited scalability, the dataset size is medium, making it a feasible choice overall compared to the other models, which have weaknesses more directly aligned with the dataset's characteristics, such as CPU requirements or tabular data handling." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets with imbalanced data, which matches the dataset properties. It is optimized for imbalanced data, tabular data, and can be run on CPU, which is a requirement based on the additional needs. Additionally, LUNAR offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it an efficient choice given the data characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is well-suited for handling tabular data and specifically addresses imbalanced datasets, which is a key characteristic of the given dataset. Despite relying on GPU, its capability to work with imbalanced data makes it the best fit compared to other models which are either unsuitable for tabular or imbalanced data, rely heavily on GPU, or have strong weaknesses in such aspects. Moreover, it offers short training time, which aligns well with the requirement for CPU-based processing." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is most suitable for this dataset because it specifically handles imbalanced data, which is a critical characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, it is capable of handling medium-sized datasets and performs well with tabular data. While its strengths are generally enhanced by GPU usage, it can still be used effectively for computations on a CPU. Its short training time is advantageous for efficient model optimization. Despite its lack of scalability for very large datasets, this limitation is not a concern given the dataset's medium size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is a critical characteristic of the dataset. Despite the requirement for CPU, its capability to manage medium-sized tabular data and imbalanced data makes it a better fit compared to other models that either struggle with tabular data or have weaknesses dealing with imbalances. Moreover, SO-GAAL has a short training time which complements the medium data size constraint." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the best choice for this dataset because it handles tabular data and is specifically designed to manage imbalanced data, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It also has a short training time and can be executed using CPU resources, aligning well with the additional requirement for CPU. Despite some weaknesses with noisy data and high memory, its strengths match the dataset properties more closely than the other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is selected because it has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It is suitable for tabular data and has a short training time. Although it does have weaknesses in scalability and noisy data, its ability to manage imbalanced datasets outweighs these drawbacks given the dataset's medium size. The requirement for CPU does not strongly align with any model's strengths, but SO-GAAL's short training time could mitigate performance concerns on CPU. Overall, SO-GAAL strikes the best balance between the dataset's needs and model capabilities." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is selected due to its strengths in handling imbalanced data and its applicability to tabular data, both of which align with the characteristics of the dataset. Although it requires GPU for optimal performance, it has a short training time which is beneficial given the medium-sized data. While it does require a GPU which isn't specified in the CPU requirement, it still balances the scales appropriately among the available models considering the dataset's imbalanced nature." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice for the given dataset as it handles tabular data and imbalanced datasets effectively, which are key characteristics of the dataset in question. Additionally, LUNAR is a good fit because it can be operated with a CPU and offers a scalable solution with short training time, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. While LUNAR has weaknesses in handling high memory and sensitivity to hyperparameters, these are not highlighted as critical factors in the dataset, making it a more appropriate choice than other models with more severe weaknesses in this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it supports tabular data and handles imbalanced data effectively. It has a strength in scalable to large datasets with short training time, which fits the medium data size requirement on a CPU. Although it can be computationally intensive, its strengths align well with the dataset characteristics, especially for handling sparse and imbalanced data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable model because it handles imbalanced data effectively, which is one of the key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it works well with tabular data, and although it typically utilizes a GPU, its relative advantages with imbalanced data make it the best option available. While the data requirements specify CPU, SO-GAAL's strengths align closely with the dataset's needs compared to the other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is designed to handle tabular and imbalanced data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It performs well on imbalanced datasets, is suitable for CPU use, and offers short training times. Despite needing high memory, LUNAR's ability to deal with sparse and low-dimensional datasets along with scalability to large datasets aligns well with the dataset's medium size and characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is chosen because it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics of being tabular and imbalanced. While it is optimized for GPU, which doesn\u2019t perfectly match the requirement for CPU, it still provides strong support for handling imbalanced data. It also offers a short training time, which can mitigate the computational cost associated with CPU use. The weaknesses associated with SO-GAAL such as limited scalability and issues with noisy data are less of a concern given the dataset size is medium and no explicit noise characteristics were indicated." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is a suitable choice because it is designed to handle tabular data and is particularly strong when dealing with imbalanced datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags provided. Additionally, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets and offers short training times, which is beneficial since we are restricted to CPU usage. Despite some potential computational intensity, its strengths complement the dataset's characteristics better than the other models, particularly in handling the imbalance and providing efficient training." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is selected because it specifically addresses the key dataset characteristic of 'imbalanced data', which is crucial given the dataset tags. While it has some weaknesses, such as limited scalability, it aligns well with using a 'medium' sized, 'tabular data' and can operate effectively on a 'CPU'. Its ability to handle imbalanced data greatly outweighs its limitations in this context, making it the most suitable choice from the model list provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable model for this dataset as it handles imbalanced data well, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, SO-GAAL is effective for tabular data and operates efficiently on a CPU, matching the dataset's additional requirement. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data and small datasets, these do not conflict with the dataset's characteristics, making it a fit for the given medium-sized tabular dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable model since it has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It is also capable of processing tabular data effectively. While it typically prefers GPU for operations, its short training time is beneficial given the CPU requirement. Despite some weaknesses such as limited scalability, the medium size of the dataset makes SO-GAAL a more appropriate choice compared to other models that have significant weaknesses related to imbalanced or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset as it handles tabular data effectively, which fits the dataset's data type. It is robust to imbalanced data, a key characteristic of the dataset, and it supports CPU, which satisfies the additional requirement. The model's strengths align well with the dataset properties, making it a fitting choice among the available options, despite its long training time on CPU and some other weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is a suitable choice because it excels in handling medium-sized, tabular datasets with imbalanced data, which aligns with the dataset tags provided. While SO-GAAL has a weakness for real-time and noisy data, these are not primary concerns based on the dataset properties highlighted. Additionally, its strength in handling imbalanced data is a key requirement for this dataset, making it the most fitting option from the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this task considering the dataset characteristics. It is specifically strong in handling tabular data and imbalanced data, which are key properties of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR is optimized for short training time and is scalable to large datasets. While the model uses GPU, which is not ideal due to the CPU requirement, its ability to efficiently handle imbalanced and tabular datasets makes it a better fit than others in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model as it is specifically designed to handle tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which match the dataset characteristics. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which is beneficial given the medium data size. Although it typically prefers a GPU, the strengths related to data imbalance and tabular data make it the best option from the list, considering the CPU requirement is less critical for the model's performance compared to its strengths." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is suitable for medium-sized, tabular datasets with imbalanced data, which matches the dataset properties. Its ability to handle short training times and handle imbalanced data makes it apt in this case. However, it should be noted that it typically requires a GPU, but since CPU is mentioned in additional requirements, it would work if GPU is available. While the use of CPU might not fully leverage SO-GAAL to its full potential, it's still the best match compared to others given the circumstances." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable choice for the given dataset as it specifically handles imbalanced data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, it supports medium-sized tabular data effectively, aligning well with the dataset properties. Although it has limitations with noisy data and scalability, it still provides short training time and addresses imbalanced data efficiently, making it a better fit than others under the provided constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is characterized by medium-sized, tabular data and is imbalanced. While the models need to have strengths in dealing with tabular data and imbalanced conditions, they must also run efficiently on a CPU. LUNAR is specifically strong at handling tabular data, sparse data, and imbalanced datasets, which suits the dataset characteristics well. Although it is computationally intensive, its scalability to large datasets and short training time make it a practical choice given the medium data size. Additionally, LUNAR does not have CPU constraints listed as a significant weakness, making it more adaptable to such a requirement compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is strong with imbalanced data and compatible with medium-sized tabular data, important factors for this dataset. Additionally, its capability for fast training on GPUs makes it favorable despite the preference for CPU, as it provides rapid and efficient learning suitable for non-GPU environments too. Although it has weaknesses in noisy data and small datasets, these do not align with our current dataset characteristics, making it a fitting choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is selected because it effectively handles imbalanced data, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Despite being designed for GPU usage, it has a short training time, making it suitable for CPU, especially when considering the weaknesses of other models for imbalanced tabular data. SO-GAAL provides the best compromise between strengths and addressing the dataset's requirements, despite its limitations with noisy and real-time data, which are not significant factors here." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it specifically aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is designed to handle tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. Additionally, LUNAR supports CPU usage, which is an additional requirement, and it also offers short training times and scalability to larger datasets. While its weaknesses include high memory and hyperparameter sensitivity, these are outweighed by its strengths in handling the specified dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It specifically supports tabular data and is effective for imbalanced data, which are both key characteristics of the given dataset. Additionally, LUNAR is executable on a CPU while still offering short training times and scalability to large datasets, aligning well with the 'CPU' constraint. Its ability to handle sparse data and scalability further complements the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is particularly suitable for handling imbalanced tabular datasets, which aligns with the 'imbalanced data' tag in the dataset. Despite its limited scalability, it has strengths in dealing with medium-sized datasets with imbalanced characteristics and requires a short training time, which is beneficial given the 'CPU' requirement. This makes it a better choice compared to other models, which either do not handle imbalanced data well or are not suitable for tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data, characterized by imbalance and requires CPU compatibility. SO-GAAL is designed to handle imbalanced data effectively, which is a critical characteristic of this dataset. Although it is generally more suitable for GPUs, it has strengths with short training times and does not severely conflict with the CPU requirement. Other models like VAE, AE1SVM, ALAD, and AutoEncoder have weaknesses related to imbalanced data or CPU compatibility. Therefore, SO-GAAL is the most suitable choice given its ability to address the dataset's imbalance and size efficiently." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is of medium size, tabular, and imbalanced, with a requirement to operate on a CPU. Among the available models, LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. Additionally, it provides a short training time, which is advantageous when computational resources are limited to a CPU. While LUNAR prefers a GPU, its strengths in handling the specific dataset characteristics of tabular and imbalanced data make it the best option from the provided list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it specifically addresses the issue of imbalanced data, which is a notable characteristic of the dataset. Although it uses a GPU and is generally efficient for short training times, the requirement for CPU is a constraint; however, other models with CPU compatibility have significant weaknesses in managing imbalanced data. Despite its limited scalability, it is well suited for medium-sized tabular datasets as specified by the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable model considering the dataset properties. The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with a characteristic of being imbalanced, and it requires CPU. Among the available models, SO-GAAL specifically has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is a crucial requirement. Although its strengths are not focused on tabular data, it effectively handles image and finance data, indicating versatility in data types. Additionally, its weakness in real-time data and noisy data are not concerns for this dataset. Considering the dataset's requirements for imbalanced data handling and computational limitations (CPU), SO-GAAL is an appropriate choice despite its less specified strengths in this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is strong in handling tabular and imbalanced data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. The model is also suitable for CPU environments and offers short training time, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. Additionally, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets, which is beneficial for a medium-sized dataset. Although LUNAR has weaknesses like high memory usage and hyperparameter sensitivity, these are outweighed by its strengths in handling the specific dataset characteristics mentioned." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data with characteristics of imbalanced datasets. It has strengths in handling imbalanced and sparse data, making it suitable for the dataset's characteristics. Although it is computationally intensive, it satisfies the CPU requirement better than models that are explicitly GPU-dependent. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, matching the dataset's medium size requirement. While other models may also work with tabular data, LUNAR's ability to handle imbalanced data effectively gives it an edge for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is selected because it is specifically strong in handling imbalanced data and is efficient with medium-sized tabular datasets, which matches well with the dataset properties. While its reliance on GPU is a minor drawback as CPU is preferred, its ability to handle imbalanced data is critical here, outweighing the limitation of CPU preference in this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is well-suited for the given dataset properties as it is designed to handle tabular data and imbalanced datasets, which are key characteristics of the dataset in question. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time making it efficient on CPU systems, and it is scalable to medium-sized datasets, meeting all the outlined requirements. While the model has a weakness in handling noisy data and being computationally intensive, this is less of a concern given its strengths align closely with the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, imbalanced, and requires a CPU-friendly model. LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, effectively handles imbalanced data, and supports scalable solutions, essential for the medium-sized dataset. Despite its GPU preference, it has a short training time, which could compensate for CPU usage needs. Considering these characteristics, LUNAR aligns well with the dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is best suited for the given dataset because it handles tabular and imbalanced data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. While it has limitations with noisy data and small datasets, the dataset size here is medium, and it emphasizes CPU usage, a common requirement for SO-GAAL. Its strengths in handling imbalanced data and short training time align well with the dataset's characteristics and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable model based on the dataset's characteristics. It has strengths in handling imbalanced data, which is a critical aspect of the dataset. Although it requires a GPU for best performance, it can work with CPU as well. The dataset's medium size fits SO-GAAL well as it is not suited for small datasets. Furthermore, its ability to handle tabular data, coupled with a short training time, makes it suitable for the available computational resources which prefer CPU. Overall, SO-GAAL aligns well with the dataset properties compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model because it is well-suited for tabular and imbalanced data, which fits the dataset characteristics. It offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which aligns with the medium data size and requirement for CPU resources. Though it is computationally intensive, its strengths in handling imbalanced datasets and tabular data make it a better fit than other models given the dataset's properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it is specifically well-suited for tabular data and imbalanced data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it operates efficiently with CPU resources and offers short training times, satisfying the additional requirements. Despite having a computationally intensive nature and being sensitive to hyperparameters, LUNAR's strengths align closely with the dataset needs better than the other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and model characteristics. It is effective for handling imbalanced data, which is crucial for this dataset. Although it primarily benefits from GPU, it has a short training time and can work with a medium-sized dataset. While it has some limitations, such as limited scalability and issues with noisy data, the emphasis on handling imbalanced data and compatibility with tabular data makes it a preferable choice given the options available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and imbalanced, with a requirement for CPU processing. LUNAR is well-suited for tabular and imbalanced data, has a short training time, and can scale to large datasets, which is beneficial given the medium size of the dataset. Although LUNAR is typically associated with GPU usage, it meets more of the dataset's characteristics and requirements compared to other models in the list, specifically handling tabular and imbalanced data effectively. Additionally, LUNAR's strengths in finance and cybersecurity domains suggest robust handling of imbalanced data scenarios, aligning it well with the dataset's needs, despite the CPU preference." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable model because it handles imbalanced data well, which is a primary characteristic of the dataset. Although it typically utilizes a GPU, it is designed to work with tabular data and offers short training times, addressing the computational constraints of CPU. Other models either have weaknesses in handling imbalanced data or are not optimized for tabular data. Additionally, the dataset size is medium, which aligns well with SO-GAAL's capabilities, as it is intended for such data proportions." + }, + { + "selected_model": "SO-GAAL", + "reason": "SO-GAAL is the most suitable choice given the dataset's characteristics. It handles imbalanced data effectively, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. While the dataset is tabular, SO-GAAL's strengths in short training time and ability to manage medium-sized datasets align well with the requirement for CPU usage, since it does not specifically mention a requirement for GPU." + } + ], + "mnist": [ + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality with noisy data, which matches well with the strengths of the AutoEncoder. It is particularly well-suited for high-dimensional and noisy tabular data, as it handles high memory requirements well and is scalable to large datasets. Furthermore, it requires relatively short training time, making it efficient for large datasets on a setup with high memory, even though it utilizes GPU effectively. Although it does require high memory, this aligns with the dataset's requirement, which calls for a model that can efficiently leverage high memory availability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which align well with the dataset properties. It is also scalable to large datasets and operates efficiently with high memory, both of which are relevant given the dataset requirements. Despite its weakness in imbalanced data, it meets more dataset criteria than the other models, particularly compared to those with further weaknesses in CPU performance or longer training times." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is a suitable choice for this dataset given its strengths in handling high-dimensional, tabular, and noisy data, as well as its capability to scale to large datasets with short training times. It also aligns with the dataset's requirement for high memory availability and absence of necessity for real-time processing, which compensates for its weakness in those areas. Its advantages outweigh its weaknesses for the given dataset characteristics and computational requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is designed to handle tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns directly with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it can work efficiently with large datasets and has short training time, making it appropriate for high-memory computing environments which align with the dataset requirements. Although a GPU is preferable, high memory is mentioned as a requirement, which AutoEncoder also supports." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE, or Variational Autoencoder, is the most suitable model for the dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data. Although it prefers GPU, it is also compatible with high memory requirements, making it a fit given the additional CPU and memory constraints. VAE's short training time and scalability to large datasets further align with the dataset characteristics of large size and high dimensionality, despite its incompatibility with CPU preference, which will have to be managed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset properties, which include tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, along with the requirement for large data size compatibility on a CPU with high memory. It effectively handles high dimensionality and noisy data, is scalable to large datasets, and operates well on tabular data. While it does require a GPU for optimal performance, its ability to manage high memory and efficiently train on large datasets makes it the most suitable model among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset because it handles high dimensional and noisy tabular data effectively. It is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the 'large' data size tag. Additionally, it supports high memory usage, which is an additional requirement. Despite some weaknesses like handling small data sizes and real-time data, these do not apply here, making AutoEncoder the best choice among the listed models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy tabular data, both of which are characteristics of the given dataset. It is capable of utilizing GPU and high memory, aligning with the CPU and high memory requirements. Additionally, the AutoEncoder can efficiently handle large datasets with short training times and scalability. Despite its weakness in handling imbalanced data, this aligns more closely with the dataset properties and demands compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice because it is strong with tabular data and high-dimensional, noisy datasets, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It also supports large data sizes and operates well with high memory and GPU resources, fitting the additional computational requirements. Although it has weaknesses in handling imbalanced data, this is not a primary concern based on the dataset tags provided. Its short training time and scalability make it efficient for large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset characteristics. It handles tabular and high-dimensional data proficiently, both of which are important given the dataset type and characteristics. It also deals well with noisy data and large datasets, which are pertinent for the current sample as well. Additionally, the AutoEncoder can leverage high memory availability and provides a short training time, which are crucial given the additional requirements. While it does not excel with imbalanced data and CPU preference, the other important dataset characteristics align well, making it the best available option from the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is suited for large, tabular datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches well with the dataset properties. It also supports large datasets and high memory, which aligns with the resource requirements. Additionally, it provides high scalability and short training time. Although it has some weaknesses like imbalanced data, these are less relevant compared to the advantages it offers for the specified dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for the given dataset because it supports high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it performs well with tabular data and large datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. VAE also has high memory requirements, matching the additional requirements specified. While it has a weakness with CPU usage, the strengths align well with the critical features of the dataset, making it the most suitable model overall among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. Additionally, it is efficient with high memory usage and short training time, suitable for the available CPU and high memory resources." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is best suited for the provided dataset properties as it can handle large, high-dimensional, and noisy tabular data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset tags like 'large', 'tabular data', 'noisy data', and 'high dimensionality'. It is also scalable and has a short training time, addressing the computational requirements specified. Other models have explicit weaknesses or less suitability in terms of either tabular data handling, CPU constraints, or dealing with noise and high dimensionality effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected because it is well-suited for large, high-dimensional, tabular data with noisy characteristics. It is capable of handling large datasets efficiently with high memory and GPU support. Despite having some weaknesses with imbalanced data, it aligns best with the dataset characteristics, especially given the requirement for high memory utilization on CPU architecture. Its scalability, short training time, and ability to handle noisy data make it the most suitable option among the listed models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable for the described dataset as it effectively handles tabular data and high dimensionality, both of which match the dataset tags. It is also equipped to deal with noisy data, aligns well with the requirement for scalability to large datasets, and makes efficient use of high memory available. Though it primarily operates with GPU, the dataset requirement of CPU can be managed given its overall compatibility with other dataset properties. This makes it the best fit among the options available in the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational AutoEncoder) is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and requirements. The dataset is large with high dimensional and noisy tabular data, which VAE is strong at handling. Additionally, VAE is capable of utilizing high memory and provides a short training time, making it efficient for large datasets. Although VAE may not perform well with discrete or categorical data and cannot run primarily on CPU, its strengths align well with the main dataset characteristics, making it the best choice among the listed models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset has large size and tabular data characteristics with high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns well with the strengths of the VAE model. VAE is suited for high-dimensional, noisy tabular data and can handle large datasets efficiently with high memory, matching the dataset's requirement. Despite its weakness with CPU, the ability to utilize high memory makes it a suitable choice considering the tabular data and noise in the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset as it supports tabular data, handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset characteristics well. Additionally, it operates efficiently with high memory and GPU resources, which complements the additional requirements of this dataset. Despite its weaknesses with small data sizes and real-time data, these do not conflict with the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it handles tabular data effectively and is well-suited for datasets with high dimensionality, noisy data, and large size. It also benefits from short training times and scalability to large datasets, which matches the dataset requirements of handling high memory and using CPU. While it prefers GPU over CPU, its ability to effectively process high-dimensional, noisy, and large tabular datasets makes it the best choice among available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for the dataset because it supports tabular data, is effective with high-dimensional and noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets. It also leverages high memory resources which align with the dataset's high memory requirement, and it benefits from short training times. While VAE's use of CPUs can be a weakness, its strengths closely match the given dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is a strong candidate due to its ability to handle tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it supports large datasets and utilizes high memory, as per the dataset's additional requirements. The model's strengths in GPU utilization and having a short training time also match the dataset's needs, while its weaknesses do not negatively impact the dataset characteristics significantly." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It can handle tabular data effectively and is robust to noisy data and high dimensionality, which are important characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets, accommodates high memory requirements, and requires short training time, making it a good fit for CPU-based environments, even though it's not optimized for CPUs. Despite its weaknesses with small datasets and imbalanced data, these are not concerns for the current dataset, and the strengths align closely with the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is highly suitable for this application because it handles tabular data well, it is capable of managing high dimensionality, and it is robust against noisy data. Its strengths include working effectively with large datasets, leveraging high memory, and ensuring short training time. Even though it is GPU-oriented, which fits well with the requirement of handling high memory efficiently, it is still a better fit compared to other models whose weaknesses like CPU preference or exclusive support for small data sizes do not align with the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the best choice as it supports tabular data, handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, which align with the dataset's characteristics. It is also scalable to large datasets, suitable for high memory requirements, and efficient for short training times using a GPU, which fits well with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it has a weakness for CPU usage, the mention of 'high memory' suggests that a GPU is acceptable. Other models have critical weaknesses such as CPU preference or inability to deal with noisy data, making AutoEncoder a more suitable option given these dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for handling the given dataset properties. It supports tabular data and is capable of managing both high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it scales well to large datasets and works effectively with high memory resources, aligning well with the 'large' dataset size and 'high memory' requirements. While there is a need for CPU usage which is a weakness, the overall strengths such as short training time and ability to handle high dimensions and noise make it a strong fit for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model as it excels at handling high dimensionality and noisy tabular data. It is also scalable to large datasets and can utilize high memory, all of which align well with the dataset's properties. Despite the model's weakness in handling imbalanced and low-signal data, these issues are less critical given the dataset's descriptions, making AutoEncoder a suitable choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, matching the dataset characteristics. It supports high memory, can handle high dimensionality, and is scalable to large datasets, which is crucial given the dataset properties. Although it is not ideal for CPU-based environments, its strengths align well with the dataset's key properties, making it the most appropriate choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It excels at processing large tabular datasets, aligns well with the CPU and high memory requirements, and offers scalability to large datasets. While it has weaknesses with imbalanced data and low-signal data, these are not highlighted as issues in the current dataset context, making it the best fit compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for this dataset as it handles tabular data effectively and is robust against noisy data. It supports high-dimensional data and scales well to large datasets, which matches the dataset's characteristics of being large with high dimensionality and noise. Additionally, it offers high memory usage that complements the dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice given the dataset characterized by large, high-dimensional, tabular data with noise. It handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, is scalable to large datasets, and efficiently utilizes high memory environments. Although it requires high memory, it doesn't have notable weaknesses for large tabular datasets, unlike other models which have critical weaknesses for either tabular data, noisy data, or high memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It handles large tabular datasets well, supports high-dimensional and noisy data, and is designed to work efficiently with GPUs and high memory environments. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, meeting the dataset's requirement for handling high dimensionality and noise effectively. While it has some weaknesses, such as performance on small data and imbalanced data, these do not conflict with the current dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model as it handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, which align with the dataset characteristics. It supports tabular data, scales well with large datasets, and is optimized for high memory and GPU usage, meeting the additional requirements of the dataset. Although other models like ALAD and VAE also have relevant strengths, AutoEncoder's short training time makes it particularly adaptable and efficient for CPU-based environments, making it the best fit overall considering the dataset's properties and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable for this task because it handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, both of which are characteristics of the dataset. VAEs also support tabular data, which is the data type in question, and are efficient on large datasets with high memory usage, meeting the hardware requirements. Although it prefers GPU, its strengths align more closely with the dataset properties compared to the weaknesses in CPU usage and handling imbalanced data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice because it is strong with tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data\u2014all key characteristics of the dataset at hand. It is also efficient with large datasets and able to handle high memory requirements, aligning with the dataset's need for CPU and high memory. Additionally, AutoEncoder's short training time and scalability make it particularly well-suited for handling the large data size efficiently, addressing this dataset's requirements better than other options despite the presence of noise." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for handling large, high-dimensional, and noisy tabular data, which matches the dataset's properties of large size, high dimensionality, and noisy data. It is capable of utilizing high memory, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirement of high memory. Furthermore, AutoEncoder offers the advantage of a short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it an appropriate choice given the context of using CPU and handling a substantial dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling large, high-dimensional tabular data with noise. It is also capable of making use of the provided high memory and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset characteristics. AutoEncoder's short training time and the ability to perform on a GPU make it suitable for computational needs. Despite its weakness in managing imbalanced data, it does not require real-time processing or CPUs, aligning perfectly with the dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns closely with the dataset properties provided. It can handle large datasets and high dimensionality, both of which are present in the dataset. Despite its weakness with CPU requirements, the high memory strength and short training time make it suitable for the given computational constraints, allowing it to efficiently process and learn from the complex data structure." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It works well with tabular data, which is the type of data provided. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, offers short training times, and performs well with high memory requirements, significantly matching the described dataset tags and additional requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets, effectively handling noisy data, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It is optimized for use with high memory and performs well with GPU, matching the dataset's computational requirements. Moreover, it offers scalability for large datasets and is known for short training times, fitting the need for efficient processing on this type of data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It handles tabular data effectively, supports high dimensionality, and is robust to noisy data. The VAE is scalable to large datasets, aligns with high memory requirements, and can be trained in a relatively short time. Although it has weaknesses with CPU optimization, the model's strengths in managing noise and large dataset scalability on a GPU make it the most compatible choice given the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice based on the given dataset properties and model analyses. The dataset consists of large tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy characteristics. VAE is strong in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data. Additionally, it supports large datasets, is efficient with high memory, and has a short training time, which aligns well with the dataset's requirement of high memory and CPU. While it has weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these do not conflict significantly with the provided dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is the most suitable model for this dataset as it supports tabular data, handles high-dimensional and noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets. It also takes advantage of GPU and high memory capabilities, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it has a weakness related to CPU and long training time, these are mitigated by the strengths that align well with the dataset characteristics, making it the best choice from the provided list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets with noisy data, leveraging its strengths in efficiently handling high dimensionality and noise. It is scalable to large datasets and operates effectively in a high-memory environment, matching the dataset's requirements. Additionally, the AutoEncoder has a short training time, making it a suitable choice given CPU constraints, despite its potential weakness in handling imbalanced data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for the dataset given its strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, which are both key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is effective with noisy data, a significant trait of the dataset, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's large size. It utilizes GPU and high memory, which matches the system requirements. Although it has a weakness with CPU, the strength in other areas makes it more suitable than other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is best suited for the given dataset properties as it handles tabular data effectively, supports high dimensionality, and manages noisy data well. It's scalable to large datasets, which matches the requirements of a large data size. The model operates efficiently with high memory and a GPU, aligning with the dataset's computational requirements. Although it has weaknesses, they do not directly impact this use case. Thus, AutoEncoder is a suitable choice given the dataset's characteristics and additional computational requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice given the dataset's characteristics of large size, tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data. It handles high memory requirements well and is scalable to large datasets while offering short training times. Although it requires GPU, which aligns with the additional requirements, AutoEncoder also excels in dealing with high-dimensional and noisy data, making it a strong candidate for the provided dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice as it is designed for tabular data and can handle high-dimensional and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It also supports large datasets efficiently due to its scalability and high memory capability, which is compatible with the CPU requirement. Moreover, its short training time helps in faster model deployment." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It is effective with tabular data, handles high dimensionality well, and performs adequately with noisy data, all of which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it prefers GPU, the requirement of using CPU is mitigated by high memory capability. Thus, AutoEncoder offers a balanced strength for this dataset, making it the best choice from the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is a suitable choice for this dataset as it is strong in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the current dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and performs well with high memory resources. While it needs a GPU, the focus on CPU is not critical given the model's other strengths. Its short training time is also advantageous, making it a balanced choice for the given requirements." + } + ], + "arrhythmia": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data characteristics. It handles high memory requirements effectively and supports both GPU usage and short training time, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirements. Unlike other models, VAE has specific strengths in handling tabular data which matches exactly with the dataset type, and overcomes its own weakness concerning CPU dependency by leveraging GPU capability, making it a more adaptable choice for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "The dataset is characterized by high dimensionality, noisy data, and tabular data, which ALAD is specifically strong in handling. Additionally, ALAD is scalable to large datasets and requires high memory, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirement of high memory usage. Despite having a long training time as a weakness, ALAD's strengths closely match the essential characteristics of the dataset, making it the most suitable choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is well-suited for the dataset properties: it supports tabular data and is robust to high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches the dataset tags. It can handle large datasets, which is suitable for a medium-sized dataset, and it requires high memory, aligning well with the dataset's additional CPU and memory requirements. Although it requires a GPU for optimal performance, it is fully capable of scaling to larger datasets, making it ideal given the dataset characteristics and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is best suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, matching the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, its compatibility with high memory use and short training time address the computational requirements specified. Although VAE does require careful tuning of hyperparameters, its advantages in the given context outweigh this weakness." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is particularly well-suited to the dataset attributes because it handles tabular data and high-dimensionality effectively, and is capable of managing noisy data. It also supports high memory environments which aligns with the additional requirement mentioned. Despite being more effective with GPU, VAE's strengths with tabular and high-dimensional data, along with short training times and scalability to large datasets, make it the most suitable option given the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is most suitable for the given dataset as it matches well with the dataset's properties such as being medium-sized, high dimensionality, and containing noisy data. VAE supports tabular data and efficiently handles high dimensional and noisy datasets, operating well with high memory on CPU infrastructure. It offers a short training time, making it viable for medium-sized datasets. Though it has weaknesses with discrete and categorical data and is ideally suited for GPU, its alignment with the key characteristics and support for tabular data make it the most suitable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is highly suitable for the given dataset characteristics. It is strong with tabular data, handles high dimensionality, and performs well with noisy data, which are critical features of the dataset. Additionally, VAE operates efficiently with high memory and has a short training time, aligning with the computational resource constraints of CPU and high memory requirements. Its ability to work well with large datasets makes it an excellent fit for the medium-sized dataset we have." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for the dataset as it effectively handles tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data. It can run efficiently on systems with high memory and leverage GPUs for faster processing. Although it may struggle with categorical or sparse data, these are not the focus of the dataset's characteristics, making VAE the best choice given the options available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, as mentioned in the dataset tags. It performs well with tabular data and can handle high dimensionality and noise efficiently. Moreover, VAE supports high memory environments, which aligns with the additional requirements. Despite its weakness in dealing with CPU environments, it fits the majority of the dataset characteristics and requirements, making it the most suitable choice among the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a suitable choice because it supports tabular data and is adept at handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It also accommodates medium data sizes and operates efficiently with high memory on a CPU. Its strengths overlap heavily with the dataset characteristics, making it the best match compared to other options which either do not adequately support tabular data or have a weakness with noisy data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it is capable of handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, VAE is efficient on a medium data size, supports high memory environments, and benefits from GPU acceleration for optimal performance. While it does not perform well with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these weaknesses are not primary concerns given the dataset tags provided. It also avoids the high computational cost associated with the CPU, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirements for a CPU and high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice for this dataset given its strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data. Additionally, it is well-suited for datasets that require high memory usage and can efficiently utilize GPU resources with a short training time, meeting the 'high memory' and 'CPU' additional requirements. Although its weakness includes CPU usage, the strengths, particularly for handling tabular and high-dimensional noisy data, align closely with the dataset's properties, making it the most appropriate choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It also supports high memory, a requirement due to the dataset's size and complexity. Despite using CPU and high memory, its strength in handling high dimensionality and noise, combined with its scalability to large datasets, makes ALAD the best choice among the models listed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is described as medium-sized tabular data with high dimensionality and noise. The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data and has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data. Moreover, it operates effectively with GPU and high memory, which aligns with the additional requirements. Its short training time and scalability to large datasets make it a practical choice for efficient training processes." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, VAE supports high memory usage and is efficient on large datasets, making it compatible with the 'medium' dataset size and computational requirements. Despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data and CPU preference, these are outweighed by its strengths in high dimensionality and noisy data, which are more critical for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable choice as it excels in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It also supports high memory usage and has a short training time, which fits the additional requirements. While it has a weakness with CPU usage, its strengths significantly match the dataset tags better than other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is best suited for this dataset as it excels at handling high dimensionality and noisy tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Furthermore, it operates well on larger datasets with a requirement for high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it is not specifically optimized for CPU, VAE's strengths in handling tabular, high-dimensional, and noisy data outweigh its limitations, making it the most suitable choice among the models provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is suitable for high dimensional, noisy, tabular data, making it a good fit for the dataset properties provided. While it requires high memory, it can handle high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, which are crucial characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, ensuring that the medium size of the data is manageable. The weaknesses of ALAD related to time series, audio, and video are not relevant to the dataset, and it does not rely on a CPU, aligning with the additional requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is the most suitable choice based on the given dataset properties. It is effective with tabular data and can handle high dimensionality and noisy data well, matching the main characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, its strengths include compatibility with GPU and high memory, which align with the additional requirements specified for the dataset. The VAE also supports a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it robust for a medium-sized dataset. Its primary weakness of poor handling of discrete or categorical data is not a highlighted concern in the provided dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular with high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches the strengths of the AutoEncoder model. AutoEncoder is suitable for high-dimensional tabular data, handles noisy data well, has high memory capacity, and can scale to large datasets. Although training requires GPU, it matches the high memory requirement suitable for the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this dataset as it handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is well-suited for tabular data, supports high memory, and offers scalability to large datasets, meeting the requirement for CPU-based implementations with high memory demands. Although it requires GPUs for optimal performance, it offers a balance of strengths that align well with the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is highly suitable for this dataset as it is strong in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, all of which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, VAE performs well with medium-sized datasets and supports high memory systems, aligning well with the provided dataset requirements. Despite its weakness with imbalanced and real-time data, these are not priorities according to the dataset tags, making VAE the most suitable model considering the strengths and weaknesses outlined." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, consisting of tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data. AutoEncoder is recognized for its capability to handle high-dimensional and noisy data, especially in tabular form, which matches well with the dataset tags. It also supports high memory requirements and short training times, suitable for the computational preferences of using CPU and requiring high memory. While it has weaknesses with small data sizes, which is not a concern here, it aligns well with other dataset needs such as high dimensional and noisy data processing." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for this dataset because it handles tabular data effectively and excels with high dimensionality and noisy data. Additionally, it supports high memory requirements and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset's need for high memory operations. VAE operates efficiently with a short training time, making it practical for medium-sized datasets. Although it has a weakness with CPU usage, the VAE's strengths align closely with the dataset characteristics, particularly in terms of handling high dimensionality and noise." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is best suited for the given dataset as it handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It also supports tabular data, aligns with the high memory requirement, and can manage medium-sized datasets efficiently. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, these are not primary characteristics of the dataset, making VAE the most appropriate choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for this case due to its strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It also has the necessary support for high memory as listed in the dataset requirements. Despite its weaknesses related to CPU usage and discrete data, the strengths align well with the current dataset needs, particularly given its capability for short training time and scalability with large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model is particularly well-suited for this dataset due to its ability to handle tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it supports high memory usage, which aligns with the additional requirements given. Despite its noted weakness in CPU utilization, VAE's support for GPU makes it feasible for execution in environments with available GPU resources, alongside short training time that can enhance efficiency given the medium-sized dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, high-dimensional, and noisy, which aligns well with the strengths of the VAE model. VAE is known for handling high dimensionality and noisy data effectively. Unlike some other models, VAE supports tabular data and can operate well with a high memory requirement. It also has a short training time suitable for medium-sized datasets. While it lists CPU as a weakness, the overall match of other strengths makes it a suitable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It supports tabular data and handles high dimensional and noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics such as high dimensionality and noisy data. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and can utilize high memory, matching the additional requirement of high memory. Importantly, AutoEncoder accommodates GPU usage, which can be beneficial if GPU resources are available, ensuring short training times even on medium-sized datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it handles tabular data effectively and excels with high-dimensional and noisy data, which matches the characteristics of the dataset. It also accommodates high memory requirements and provides short training times, aligning well with the additional requirements specified. Despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data and limited support for CPU-based processing, the strengths align well with the dataset's features and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset involves tabular data with medium size, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which fits well with the strengths of the AutoEncoder. It is adept at handling high dimensionality and noisy data in tabular form. The model supports high memory usage and short training time, making it suitable given the CPU and high memory requirements, despite the CPU preference as a minor weakness. Additionally, the AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets, which provides flexibility for future scaling needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset because it handles tabular data effectively and is particularly strong in dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is designed for high-memory scenarios and can perform well without a GPU, aligning with the CPU requirement of the dataset. Although VAE has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, the absence of such a tag suggests this might not be a constraint for the given dataset. Its capability for short training time on large datasets further supports its fit for a medium-sized dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data characteristics, which require high memory. AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and handles high dimensionality and noisy data effectively. It also utilizes high memory efficiently. While it has a weakness with CPU-bound tasks, the additional requirement of CPU in this scenario makes it a minor concern compared to its strengths. With a short training time and scalability to large datasets, AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and additional requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is the most suitable choice because it handles tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also supports high memory requirements and scalability to large datasets, fitting well with additional requirements. Despite its long training time, its strengths match the dataset characteristics better than other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is chosen because it handles tabular data effectively, supports high dimensionality, and performs well with noisy data, which aligns well with the given dataset characteristics. Despite requiring high memory and potentially less CPU efficiency, it provides short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it suitable given the medium data size. The main weaknesses, such as handling discrete or categorical data and CPU inefficiency, are less critical compared to the alignment with other needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it handles tabular data and high-dimensional, noisy data effectively, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics. It requires high memory and operates efficiently on a medium-sized dataset. Although it does not prioritize CPU usage, its strengths in managing high dimensionality and noisy data make it the best fit among the models listed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is suitable for the given dataset as it handles 'tabular data' effectively, supports 'high dimensionality' and 'noisy data' which are characteristics of the dataset. Furthermore, it aligns well with the requirement of high memory and is efficient for datasets of medium size. The strengths of VAE overlap with all key dataset characteristics, fulfilling the need for scalable and supportive processing with a short training time on large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular and characterized by high dimensionality and noisy data with a requirement for CPU and high memory. VAE is strong in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data. It operates well on GPU with high memory - aligning with the dataset\u2019s high memory requirement. While VAE is not specifically optimized for CPU, its strengths align closely with the dataset\u2019s characteristics, particularly in handling tabular data and high dimensionality." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the best choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which align with the dataset properties. It also supports high memory requirements and has a short training time, making it suitable for medium-sized datasets with high-dimensional, noisy data. Additionally, while competing models like AutoEncoder and ALAD also handle tabular data and high dimensionality, VAE distinctly offers short training times and efficiency on large datasets. Its CPU limitation is mitigated by the focus on high memory setups, as noted in the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset properties include medium data size, tabular data type, high dimensionality, and noisy data, requiring a CPU with access to high memory. AutoEncoder is a strong match for these requirements as it excels with tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data while being scalable to large datasets. Additionally, it supports GPU utilization, high memory, and short training times, aligning well with the dataset characteristics. Although high dimensionality and noisy data are its strengths, the model's capability in handling tabular data, scalability, and computational efficiency make it the most suitable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it is particularly strong with tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which align with the dataset's characteristics. It also supports high memory requirements and short training times, addressing the additional requirements for CPU and high memory. While it generally prefers GPU over CPU, in this context, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data in tabular formats make it a strong candidate despite its noted weakness with discrete or categorical data. Furthermore, VAE is scalable to large datasets, making it fit for the medium-sized dataset specified." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is best suited for this dataset, which is medium in size and consists of tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy characteristics. The model's strengths align well with these dataset properties, as it supports tabular and high-dimensional data, effectively manages noisy data, and scales well to large datasets. Although it requires high memory, which matches the dataset's additional requirements, it also provides short training times, making it a practical choice despite using a CPU instead of a GPU." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it handles tabular data and is known for managing high dimensionality and noisy data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Moreover, it requires high memory but performs efficiently with short training times and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the requirement of CPU and high memory usage. The model's weaknesses in handling audio, video, or real-time data are not relevant here since these aspects do not match the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset as it handles tabular data effectively and is robust to high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics in the dataset. Additionally, it benefits from high memory resources and provides short training times, aligning well with the 'Additional requirements'. Despite CPU preference being noted, AutoEncoder's strengths in handling the other dataset characteristics and its scalability to large datasets make it the most suitable model for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for the given dataset because it effectively handles tabular and high dimensional data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is also capable of dealing with noisy data, making it a good fit for this scenario. Although it typically requires a GPU, which is not ideal since the dataset specifies CPU, the model's other strengths outweigh this requirement. Its ability to handle large datasets and short training time enhance its compatibility with the 'medium' data size specified." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for the given dataset as it handles tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data effectively. It supports high memory usage and has a short training time, which matches well with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it has a weakness in handling discrete or categorical data, this was not specified as a dataset tag, making VAE the most aligned choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. It has strengths in handling large datasets with high memory requirements and performs efficiently with GPU, aligning with additional dataset requirements. Despite its weakness in requiring a GPU for optimal performance, this model provides the best overall fit given the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and can handle datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, which are key characteristics of the given dataset. It also benefits from GPU acceleration and high memory, both of which align with the additional requirements. Despite the presence of other strengths such as high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets, AutoEncoder has a short training time, making it efficient for medium-sized datasets like this one." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model as it is strong in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which align with the characteristics of the dataset. It requires high memory and is scalable to large datasets, fitting well with the dataset's additional requirements. Although VAE has a weakness in handling CPU resources, the strengths in other areas such as short training time and adaptability to large datasets make it the best fit given the dataset's properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is most suitable as it handles high-dimensional and noisy tabular data effectively, supports high memory, and benefits from GPU acceleration. It is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it efficient for the given medium-sized dataset with high memory requirement." + } + ], + "pendigits": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and offers short training time, which is beneficial for minimizing memory usage. While it has weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data, these are less relevant given its strengths align closely with the dataset requirements and model needs. Additionally, VAE's ability to manage high-dimensional and noisy data could be advantageous for a low-signal data scenario, despite its lack of specialization in high memory usage which can be mitigated by careful resource allocation." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is best suited for this dataset because it supports tabular data and has low memory requirements, which aligns with the 'low memory' requirement of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR is designed for low-dimensional datasets, which can be relevant for low-signal data. While it is sensitive to hyperparameters, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which makes it a suitable choice given the dataset's medium size and characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data and medium-sized datasets, which matches the given dataset properties. Additionally, it has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, allowing it to potentially perform well on low-signal data. Although it requires higher memory, it is still a better fit compared to other models which have more critical weaknesses regarding low-signal data and/or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable for the dataset's characteristics which include tabular data and low memory requirements. Despite the data being labeled as 'low-signal', the AutoEncoder's ability to handle tabular data and its strengths in working with medium-sized datasets aligns well with the given dataset properties. Additionally, the AutoEncoder has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it ideal for medium data sizes with low memory constraints, outweighing its weakness with low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable because it handles tabular data effectively, aligns well with medium-sized datasets, and can accommodate low memory requirements due to its short training time and efficient scalability. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced data, this aligns with the dataset's tag of 'low-signal data' rather than an imbalance issue, making it the most fitting choice among the provided options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it is strong in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. It also has short training time, which is suitable given the low memory constraint of the dataset. Although it requires high memory generally, its strengths in managing tabular data, high dimensionality, and handling noisy data make it the most aligned choice. The weaknesses do not significantly impact this choice since the dataset does not focus on real-time data or categorical imbalanced data, which are key limitations of VAE." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model as it is effective with tabular data, which is a key property of the dataset. It supports medium data size and operates efficiently with GPU, aligning with the dataset's low memory requirement. Despite its weaknesses with imbalanced and sparse data, VAE's strengths around high dimensionality and quick training time make it the best fit among the available options for low-signal data scenarios." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized with tabular data, low-signal characteristics, and requires low memory usage. VAE specifically supports tabular data, has short training times, and can handle some amount of noisy and high-dimensional data, which makes it suitable for datasets that may require some transformation for effective pattern recognition. While VAE typically utilizes high memory, its support for tabular data and short training time outweigh this weakness compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is suitable for tabular data and is known to handle medium-sized datasets well, matching the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it operates efficiently with low memory, a crucial requirement given the dataset constraints. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, it aligns well with the need for managing low-signal data and short training times. Its strengths in handling high dimensionality and scaling to large datasets further validate its selection for the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is suitable for tabular data and datasets with low dimensionality, which aligns with the characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it operates efficiently with a medium data size, ensures low memory usage, and provides short training time, meeting the low-memory constraint. While it may have hyperparameter sensitivity, and require computational resources, these weaknesses do not outweigh its strengths in this context compared to other models like VAE or AutoEncoder that handle tabular data but require high memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable because it supports tabular data and is capable of handling medium-sized datasets with the given low-signal data characteristic. It has a short training time and can manage noisy data, which aligns with the dataset tags. Although it has a weakness with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these are not highlighted as concerns in the dataset tags provided. Importantly, it is less constrained by the low memory requirement compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Even though the dataset has low signal, VAE does not have specific weaknesses against low-signal data. It also supports medium data size effectively and has strengths in handling noisy data, which may align with low-signal characteristics. Additionally, VAE has short training times and is scalable to large datasets, which suits medium-sized datasets. However, despite requiring high memory, it balances other requirements quite well, and there is no model without a memory constraint that better matches all the dataset needs from the given list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics and low memory requirements. VAE is suitable as it supports tabular data, is compatible with medium-sized datasets, and has a short training time, which aligns well with the memory requirement. Despite the high memory note in strengths, the VAE's capability to handle tabular data efficiently makes it a better fit given the dataset constraints compared to other models that either struggle with low-signal data or tabular format." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics and a requirement for low memory usage. Among the model list, VAE has strengths in handling tabular data, medium-sized datasets, and short training time, which matches the dataset properties well. Although VAE typically requires high memory, its other strengths outweigh this weakness compared to alternatives. Models like AnoGAN, ALAD, and AE1SVM have weaknesses specifically in tabular data or low memory operations, making them less suitable. Thus, VAE offers the best balance for these requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It can handle medium-sized datasets well and provides a short training time, ensuring efficient resource usage within low memory constraints. Although it shows weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these are not primary concerns given these properties are not specified for the dataset. VAE also effectively processes low-signal tabular data and doesn't suffer the low-memory issue seen in other models, making it a good fit for the dataset needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is preferred because it handles tabular data and medium-sized datasets well, which matches the dataset property's emphasis on tabular data. Although it demands high memory, which is a downside given the low memory requirement, its short training time and ability to handle noisy data justify the compromise, particularly as other models have more significant weaknesses concerning tabular or low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also suitable for medium-sized datasets and offers short training times, which aligns with the additional requirement of low memory usage. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced data and low-signal data, these are less critical than the high memory requirement weaknesses found in other models suitable for tabular data. Other potential models like ALAD and AutoEncoder have weaknesses with low-signal data, and smaller data sizes, respectively, making VAE the better choice given the provided constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is strong with tabular data, which is the data type present in the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR is effective with low-dimensional datasets and sparse or imbalanced data, which can sometimes arise in scenarios with low-signal data. It also provides scalability to large datasets while being efficient with GPU and having short training time. LUNAR does not have any specific weaknesses associated with low memory setting, which is a requirement for this dataset. Its alignment with several dataset characteristics makes it a preferable choice over other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "Based on the dataset properties, the VAE model is the most suitable choice as it specifically supports tabular data, which matches the data type. Additionally, it provides a short training time which aligns well with the medium data size and low memory requirement of the dataset. Although VAEs generally require high memory, their compatibility with tabular data and efficient training time make them a good fit for low-signal data, particularly when other models have weaknesses regarding tabular data or low memory consumption." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is most suitable for the given dataset properties. It supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Despite having a medium data size tag, its capability to handle large datasets makes it adaptable to various data sizes. It is well-suited for low-memory environments and offers short training times. While AE1SVM has a weakness with small data sizes, the dataset is tagged as medium, which should not be an issue. Additionally, its strength in handling sparse data and imbalanced data may also provide an advantage for low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the best choice because it is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the data type in the dataset tags. It handles high dimensionality well and has a short training time, which mitigates concerns related to low memory. Although it has a weakness with low-signal data, it offers significant strengths with tabular data and large datasets while benefiting from GPU acceleration, making it the most suitable model for the given dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice for medium-sized tabular data with low memory requirements. It is specifically designed for tabular data and compatible with datasets that are not too small, while efficiently handling low-signal data due to its robustness to high dimensionality and noisy data. Although VAE may require high memory, among the other options within inconsistencies for the dataset characteristics, VAE offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it appropriate for the given dataset constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is chosen because it is effective on tabular data, which matches the dataset type. While the data is characterized as low-signal, VAE is generally versatile and can deal with high-dimensional data, which could be helpful in extracting meaningful patterns from low-signal data. It also fits the medium data size category due to its capability to handle large datasets efficiently. The model's short training time aligns well with the additional requirement of low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It can manage medium-sized datasets effectively and has a short training time, aligning well with the low-memory requirement. Although it may not be ideal for low-signal data, other models in the list have greater weaknesses related to low memory or tabular data. VAE's relative strengths in these areas make it the best fit from the given options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset involves medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics and requires low memory usage. Among the models, the AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data, can handle high dimensionality, and offers short training time, which is efficient for medium-sized datasets. Although it has a weakness with low-signal data, the AutoEncoder aligns better with the available models given its capability to process tabular data and manage relatively lower memory consumption compared to other models that either require high memory or are less suitable for tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "Given the dataset properties, a medium-sized tabular dataset with low-signal data and low memory requirements, VAE is the most suitable model. It supports tabular data and has strengths in handling noisy data, which aligns well with the low-signal characteristic. Additionally, it has a short training time and can scale to large datasets. While it has a high memory requirement, all other models have critical weaknesses that render them less suitable, such as incompatibility with tabular data or poor performance on low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset consists of medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics and requires low memory usage. VAE's strengths lie in images and tabular data, with high dimensionality handling, short training time, and scalability to large datasets. While VAE does require high memory, it does not have specific weaknesses against low-signal data and it performs well in handling tabular data, making it a suitable choice compared to other models that show significant weaknesses in one or more of the required aspects." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "Given the dataset characteristics of medium-sized, tabular, low-signal data with low memory requirements, LUNAR is the most suitable model. It handles tabular data effectively and excels in short training time, which is critical given the low memory requirement. It is also scalable to large datasets, which provides flexibility. Although it could be computationally intensive, its ability to manage sparse and imbalanced data provides an advantage needed for handling low-signal datasets effectively, making it a suitable choice among the options available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model among the options due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. It also supports low memory requirements with short training time, which aligns with the additional needs. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data, it is preferable due to its ability to work with low-dimensional datasets and scalability, which can be beneficial for medium-sized datasets with low-signal characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice for the given dataset properties. It is well-suited for tabular data and handles low-signal datasets effectively with short training times and low memory usage, which matches the medium data size and the requirement for low memory usage. While it is not optimal for noisy data, this is not tagged in the dataset, making LUNAR a sensible option given the other model weaknesses in relation to low-signal data and tabular data handling." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and provides a short training time, which is beneficial for medium-sized datasets. Although it requires high memory, its ability to handle high-dimensional and noisy data aligns with the dataset's low-signal characteristic. Despite its high memory usage, VAE's other strengths outweigh this, making it the best fit compared to others that have more critical weaknesses concerning tabular data and low-signal handling." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized, tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It handles high dimensionality and tabular data well and has a short training time, which is beneficial for low memory constraints. While it has weaknesses with imbalanced data and real-time processing, the dataset does not specify these as issues. VAE is also more likely to handle low-signal data than models like AE1SVM or AutoEncoder, which specifically list small data size and low-signal data as weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Additionally, it has a short training time which aligns with the low memory requirement. While it does require high memory, its strengths in handling tabular data and ability to efficiently work without real-time and imbalanced data issues make it a better fit than the other models given the low-signal characteristic of this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It operates efficiently with low-dimensional datasets and is scalable to large datasets, which suits the medium-sized data requirement. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time, aligning with the low memory requirement. Despite its computational intensity, it avoids the major weaknesses impacting other models for low-signal data and tabular data in this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and can handle low-dimensional datasets effectively, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also offers low memory usage and short training time, making it a good choice for medium-sized datasets with low-signal characteristics. Although it has weaknesses in noisy data and computational intensity, these are less of a concern compared to the other models' more significant weaknesses related to low-signal data or low memory settings." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is tabular with medium size, low-signal data, and has a low memory requirement. VAE is strong with tabular data and scalable to large datasets, which suits the medium data size. It also has a short training time, which may not burden memory resources. While VAE is generally high memory, its strengths with tabular data and capability for handling high dimensionality make it the most suitable option given the constraints, as other models either have weaknesses matching the dataset characteristics (e.g., low memory) or are not suitable for tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data, aligns with the dataset type, and has the ability to handle noisy data, which is important given the low-signal data characteristic. While it demands high memory, its strength in dealing with medium data size and short training time makes it a better choice compared to others. Other models like AutoEncoder and ALAD might also seem favorable, but VAE's specific strength in handling low-signal data in conjunction with tabular datasets makes it more suitable in this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is most suitable because it handles tabular data well, which matches the data type of the dataset. It also has a capability to manage medium-sized datasets due to its scalability to large datasets, even though the model is mentioned to use high memory resources. While it may not be the most optimal for low-signal data, its short training time and strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data make it the most fitting option among those listed. Other models either have significant weaknesses in tabular data (e.g., AnoGAN, DevNet), suffer from low memory which is a concern in this case (e.g., MO-GAAL, AE1SVM), or are less suitable for low-signal data contexts (e.g., ALAD, AutoEncoder)." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular data due to its strengths in handling tabular datasets and its capability of operating effectively with low-signal data. Although it typically requires high memory, which is not ideal for low memory requirements, it has short training time and leverages GPU for computation, making it efficient regarding memory usage during training. Other models either lack support for tabular data (like AnoGAN, DevNet) or are not suitable for low-signal data (like ALAD and AutoEncoder)." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets, which matches the dataset tags. It can handle high dimensional data. Although it has some weaknesses with low-signal data, it offers a short training time and scalability, which are beneficial for a dataset with a low memory requirement. Its ability to handle noisy data and use GPUs also aligns well with the characteristics of the dataset. Despite some weaknesses, it is the best fit among the options provided when considering all dataset properties and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is described as medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics and a requirement for low memory. LUNAR is suited for tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset size. It is capable of handling low-dimensional datasets and sparse data, addressing potential issues related to low-signal data. Furthermore, LUNAR has a short training time, beneficial for optimizing resources, even though it is not specifically tailored for low memory, it provides a balance between the other considerations needed for this task. Other models either have weaknesses in handling low-signal data or tabular data, or require high memory, making LUNAR the most fitting choice overall." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data and performs well with medium-sized datasets. Despite its higher memory requirements, it has a short training time and is capable of handling noisy data, aligning with the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset. While it may require tuning for discrete data, it addresses the core requirements of the dataset better than other models available in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is described as medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics, and the need for a model with low memory usage. VAE is suited for tabular data, has short training time, and can handle large datasets. Despite its high memory strength, of the given options, VAE is one of the few models that fit well with tabular data and are scalable, making it a suitable choice given the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strength in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. VAE also has the advantage of a short training time and is capable of working with medium-sized datasets. Despite its high memory requirement, the model's other strengths outweigh those of the other models for this specific dataset configuration. The low-signal data characteristic of the dataset may also be better accommodated by VAE compared to models like AutoEncoder and ALAD, which list low-signal data as a weakness." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It supports tabular data and is designed for low-dimensional datasets, making it a good fit for low-signal data attributes. LUNAR has short training time and is scalable to large datasets, aligning with the medium data size requirement. It also operates efficiently with GPU, which may mitigate some of the low memory concerns. Despite its weaknesses like sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning and being computationally intensive, these do not critically impact the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it is strong in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also accommodates low-dimensional and sparse datasets and can operate with a low memory footprint, meeting the dataset's low memory constraint. Moreover, LUNAR has a short training time and can scale to medium-sized datasets, aligning well with the dataset's tags. Although it is noted for potential computational intensity and hyperparameter sensitivity, these weaknesses are not directly conflicting with the dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is a suitable choice for this dataset as it handles tabular data efficiently, which aligns with the dataset's data type. Additionally, it supports low-dimensional datasets, matches well with the dataset's low-signal characteristic, and is suitable for datasets that need a scalable model. Despite having a medium data size, LUNAR's ability to efficiently process sparse and imbalanced data, alongside its short training time, makes it compatible with low-memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which is the type of data presented. It is also capable of dealing with noisy data, which is characteristic of low-signal datasets. Although VAE requires high memory, it offers a short training time, which is beneficial for a medium-sized dataset. Other models either have weaknesses related to low-signal data or tabular data, or require a level of memory not suitable given the dataset's additional requirements for low memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it supports tabular data, which matches one of the key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, VAE is capable of handling low-signal data, although it's not specifically highlighted as one of its strengths, it performs adequately with high dimensionality, which might help capture subtle patterns in low-signal data. Moreover, it has a short training time and is applicable to datasets of medium size, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of requiring low memory consumption due to limited memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular data and low-memory environments, both of which are key characteristics of this dataset. It also has strengths in handling imbalanced and sparse data while maintaining a short training time, which is beneficial given the medium data size. Although it has weaknesses like high memory usage, it is still the best fit given the need for low memory and the dataset's low-signal nature, compared to others that have significant weaknesses for such data types." + } + ], + "shuttle": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it is strong in handling tabular and noisy data, which fits the dataset characteristics well. It is scalable to large datasets and can also run on low memory constraints, although it typically requires high memory. Despite some weaknesses, such as sensitivity to poorly tuned hyperparameters and not being optimal for imbalanced or sparse data, its strengths align more closely with the requirements than the other models. The dataset's large size and noise can be effectively managed by the VAE's capabilities." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it is suitable for large tabular datasets and handles noisy data well, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Although it has a high memory requirement, this constraint is outweighed by its scalability to large datasets. VAE also offers short training times, which is advantageous given the additional low memory requirement, making it a balanced choice among available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it handles tabular data and large datasets effectively, which are properties of the given dataset. Additionally, VAE is strong in dealing with noisy data, a characteristic of the dataset. While VAE has a weakness with low memory requirements, it aligns well with other strengths needed for this use case, such as short training time and scalability to large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is well-suited for large, tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. VAE is adept at handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which is a crucial requirement given the dataset characteristics. Even though it does require high memory, the model compensates with a short training time, and the ability to scale to large datasets. The other models either cannot handle tabular data or noisy data as effectively or they have constraints with the memory usage. Thus, VAE is the most suitable model, balancing the strengths and the requirements of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice as it supports tabular data and is effective with noisy data, both of which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which are aligned with the dataset's large size requirement. Although VAE has high memory requirements, which contradicts the low memory constraint, its support for tabular and noisy data along with scalability makes it a better fit compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data with noisy characteristics and can handle large datasets effectively. While it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, the dataset does not mention such features as a primary concern. The VAE model is also efficient with GPU, which can aid in handling the computational load given the low memory constraint. Additionally, VAE does well with short training times on large datasets, fitting the requirement for low memory usage and scalability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, large datasets, and noisy data. It also offers scalability to large datasets which matches the 'large' data size requirement. Although it requires high memory, which could be a constraint, its ability to handle noisy and tabular data makes it preferable over other models that have identified weaknesses with such characteristics. The trade-off in terms of memory is offset by its effective handling of other key dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and model analyses. The dataset is large-sized and consists of tabular data, with characteristics of noisy and low-signal data, which VAE handles well. VAE's strengths include working well with tabular and noisy data, and it is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Although VAE requires high memory, it fits the large tabular data with noisy conditions better than other models listed, which have more prominent weaknesses in such environments, such as low-signal data handling or memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it is strong in handling tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. Additionally, it excels in processing noisy data and can handle large datasets efficiently, matching the dataset's characteristics. Although it is high memory, the absence of low memory requirement as a strength among the other models with suitable characteristics leaves VAE as a balanced trade-off considering the dataset's large size and low-signal characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the best choice because it supports tabular data, is robust to noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset tags. Although it requires high memory, its ability to handle large datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data makes it suitable for this scenario. The low-signal data in the dataset is not a weakness for VAE, unlike other models such as DevNet, ALAD, or AutoEncoder that struggle more with low-signal data or have other incompatibilities such as poor performance on noisy data or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset criteria as it is strong in handling tabular data, noisy data, and large datasets, all of which align well with the dataset properties. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory requirement. Although VAE has weaknesses in handling imbalanced and sparse data, these aspects are not highlighted as significant challenges for the provided dataset. Among the options, VAE best matches the dataset characteristics while addressing the memory constraint effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is best suited for the dataset's characteristics, including large and tabular data, along with its ability to handle noisy data efficiently. It scales well to large datasets and has short training times, which is an advantage for a large dataset. Although it has high memory usage, its efficiency in handling high-dimensional and noisy data makes it the most suitable choice given the dataset requirements and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it directly addresses the requirements of dealing with large tabular datasets, handling noise efficiently, and compatibility with high dimensionality. It is scalable to large datasets, supports noisy data, and works well with tabular data, aligning well with the dataset properties. Although it requires high memory, this is a trade-off for its benefits in handling the noise, which is a critical factor in this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this scenario as it supports tabular data, performs well with noisy and high-dimensional data, is scalable to large datasets, and has a short training time. Although it requires high memory, it meets most of the dataset requirements, particularly handling large, noisy data effectively and utilizing GPU acceleration, which aligns well with the additional requirement for low memory usage. Other models either do not support tabular data sufficiently or have issues with scalability, training time, or memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for this dataset because it supports large tabular datasets effectively. It is also capable of handling noisy data, which is a key characteristic of the given dataset. Furthermore, VAE can utilize GPU resources, necessary for handling large datasets with high dimensionality efficiently, which aligns with the 'low memory' requirement by ensuring quick processing and a short training time. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, the dataset's characteristics do not emphasize these as primary concerns, making VAE the optimal choice considering both strengths and weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for 'tabular data' and 'noisy data,' aligning well with the dataset characteristics provided. It is capable of handling 'large datasets' and offers 'short training time' advantages, which are beneficial given the large data size requirement. Although VAE requires high memory, which contradicts the low memory requirement, this is a trade-off given the focus on handling 'noisy data' and scalability, which are more critical for this dataset. Other models either have significant weaknesses with tabular data or noisy data, or lack efficiency with large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties as it successfully handles large tabular datasets, noisy and high-dimensional data, which are the characteristics of the given dataset. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which aligns well with the requirement of low memory usage. Despite being slightly weaker in capturing low-signal data, its overall strengths match the dataset needs better than the other models available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is most suitable for this dataset because it can handle large tabular data with characteristics such as noisy data and low-signal data. VAE supports GPU acceleration, which is beneficial given the large data size. Although it requires high memory, it is capable of processing large datasets efficiently and has a short training time, which aligns with the requirement for low memory usage. Despite its weaknesses in dealing with discrete or categorical data, these are not pertinent issues for this specific dataset, focusing mainly on tabular and noisy data characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset as it supports tabular data and performs well with noisy data, which are key characteristics of this dataset. It is scalable to large datasets, has a short training time, and can leverage GPUs. Although it requires high memory, which might not align perfectly with the low memory constraint, its overall strengths in handling large, noisy datasets and specific support for tabular data make it the best choice among the listed models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the best choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and large datasets. It is well-suited for noisy data, which is a characteristic of the dataset. Despite its high memory usage, it offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's large size and low memory requirement. VAE's design accommodates the low-signal data property of the dataset better than other models like AE1SVM, which lists noisy data as a weakness, or ALAD, which has low-signal data as a weakness." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset comprises large, tabular, noisy, and low-signal data, with an additional requirement of low memory. VAE is suitable as it works well with tabular data, supports noisy data, is scalable to large datasets, and provides short training times. While VAE generally needs high memory, it possesses advantages across other characteristics, outperforming other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, and ALAD that do not align well with the tabular format or low memory requirements. This makes VAE the most aligned choice from the given list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model because it performs well with tabular data, can handle noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset properties. Despite a requirement for low memory, VAE compensates with short training time and effectiveness with high-dimensional and noisy datasets, making it a balanced choice overall considering the dataset's characteristics and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this scenario as it aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It is capable of handling tabular data and works well with large datasets, which matches the dataset under consideration. Additionally, VAE effectively deals with noisy data, which is essential for this low-signal, noisy dataset. Although it is not optimized for low memory environments, its strengths in dealing with large, noisy tabular data make it a more fitting choice than the other options provided, which either lack support for noisy data or have significant weaknesses in handling tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data, which is the type of data in the dataset. It handles noisy data effectively and is scalable to large datasets, aligning with the dataset property of 'large' size. Although it has weaknesses in dealing with low-signal data, its overall strengths, including short training time and GPU support, make it a better fit compared to other models that either do not support tabular data or have issues with scalability, low memory, or noisy data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model because it handles tabular data and is designed for large datasets, aligning with the dataset properties. It performs well with noisy data and offers a short training time, which is conducive to the low memory requirements. While it has a high memory demand, this can be managed given the model's other advantages over the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for the given dataset characteristics. It is designed to handle 'tabular data', which aligns with the dataset's data type. Additionally, VAE excels with 'noisy data' and is efficient with 'large datasets'. While it requires high memory, it performs well with GPU resources, which is not a specific constraint in the dataset. Although it has some weaknesses, such as handling 'discrete or categorical data' and 'imbalanced data', these are not primary concerns provided in the dataset properties. With its strengths in handling tabular data, noise, and scalability, VAE stands out among the options available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data and is effective with noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's large size, and it features short training times. While it has high memory requirements, which may be a slight drawback considering the need for low memory, its advantages in handling the dataset's properties outweigh this limitation compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is best suited for this dataset due to its ability to handle tabular and noisy data effectively while being scalable to large datasets. It also benefits from a short training time, which is crucial given the dataset characteristics and the requirement for low memory usage. Despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data, the strengths of handling high dimensionality, use of GPU, and efficient handling of noisy data make VAE the most appropriate model for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it supports large tabular datasets with noisy data, matching the dataset properties. Despite its high memory requirement, it has strengths in handling high dimensionality, making it suitable for the provided dataset's characteristics. It also scales to large datasets and has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory requirement, despite not meeting it entirely. Overall, VAE aligns best with both the dataset needs and model capability, especially considering the noisy data aspect." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for this dataset as it is capable of handling large tabular datasets with high dimensionality. It excels in managing noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics provided. Additionally, VAE can operate efficiently on large datasets and is scalable, fulfilling the requirement for low memory usage during inference. While it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data which is not mentioned in the dataset tags and has an advantage of running on GPU which supports scalability for large data, its strengths in tabular data with noisy characteristics make it the best fit among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, noisy, and low-signal with a low-memory requirement. AutoEncoder is well-suited to handle large datasets with tabular data and is capable of handling noisy data. It has a short training time and can be scaled to large datasets using GPU, which aligns well with the dataset requirements. Despite its weakness in handling low-signal data, it is the best available option given the other constraints. Other models either have significant weaknesses with tabular data, low memory, or noisy data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, which matches the dataset properties. It offers scalability to large datasets, uses GPU, and has short training time. Although it requires high memory, which is a weakness, VAE's strengths align closely with the important dataset characteristics for this scenario, making it the most suitable choice from the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset comprises large tabular data characterized by noise and low signal, with a requirement for low memory usage. Among the given models, the AutoEncoder leverages strengths such as handling tabular data, functioning well with noisy data, and scalability to large datasets. While it typically requires high memory, its adaptability to GPU and scalable nature make it suitable for large datasets despite the low-signal nature. Additionally, it offers short training times, which is advantageous under memory constraints. Despite some weaknesses in handling low-signal data, AutoEncoder is the most balanced choice considering the need for processing large, noisy tabular datasets efficiently." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for a large tabular dataset with noisy, low-signal data and low memory requirements. It is capable of handling tabular data, performs well with noisy data, and can scale to large datasets while offering short training times due to GPU support. Despite requiring high memory, compared to other options which struggle with noisy data or have longer training times, VAE offers a balanced approach fitting the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the best choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy data, which align with the dataset characteristics. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it suitable for a large dataset. While it has high memory requirements, its other strengths make it more appropriate than other models, which have more limitations regarding noisy and low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and handles noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It can work with high-dimensional data, requires GPU, and is scalable to large datasets. Although it has high memory requirements, it offers a short training time and deals well with large datasets, making it compatible with the low memory requirement of the dataset if appropriately managed. The other models have significant weaknesses either with noisy data, tabular data, or large data scalability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it is well suited for tabular data and noisy data, both of which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is capable of handling large datasets efficiently and has a short training time, which is advantageous given the dataset's large size. Despite its high memory requirement, the strengths align better with the dataset's properties compared to other models. Models like AnoGAN, DevNet, MO-GAAL, and AE1SVM are ruled out due to their weaknesses with tabular and/or noisy data, or their low memory compatibility." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "Given the dataset's characteristics, VAE emerges as the most suitable choice. It handles tabular data well, is scalable to large datasets, and is proficient at managing noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of being large, noisy, and low-signal. Additionally, VAE supports GPU acceleration and offers short training times, which helps accommodate the requirement for low memory usage. Despite its weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data, the strengths align well with the given requirements and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and is robust to noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It also scales well to large datasets and benefits from short training times, making it suitable for this large dataset with low memory requirement. Although it requires high memory, none of the other models completely meet all the other dataset requirements while also supporting tabular data, low memory usage, and scaling." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is selected as it is suitable for tabular data, supports large datasets, and can handle noisy data, which align with the dataset tags provided. Despite its high memory requirements, VAE offers short training times and is capable of scaling to large datasets. Other models either do not support tabular data efficiently or have weaknesses that heavily misalign with the dataset's characteristics such as low memory requirements or poor performance on noisy data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the best choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular and noisy data, which align with the dataset characteristics. It is suitable for large datasets and has a short training time, addressing the low-memory requirement. Additionally, AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets, and its strength in managing high dimensionality matches the potential complexity of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model because it handles large tabular datasets efficiently, with strengths in noisy data and GPU scalability, which match the dataset properties. Although it has high memory usage which is a concern, its ability to manage large noisy datasets and compatibility with tabular data make it the best choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it effectively handles tabular and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets and can be trained quickly, making it suitable for the large data size and the requirement for low memory utilization. Although it typically requires high memory, VAE strikes a balance between dataset compatibility and processing efficiency better than other models in this context. Competitors like AnoGAN and AE1SVM have significant weaknesses (incompatibility with tabular data and issues with noisy data, respectively) that make them less suitable." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is selected as it is well-suited for handling large tabular datasets, which matches the dataset's size and type. It is also effective with noisy data, one of the key characteristics of the dataset. Despite its high memory requirements, which conflicts with the low-memory need, no other model satisfies as many requirements, especially the ability to handle noisy data and scalability to large datasets. The other models either have significant weaknesses with tabular data, such as AnoGAN, or struggle with noisy data and scalability, such as ALAD and Deep SVDD." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and can handle noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its requirement for high memory, VAE can efficiently manage large datasets and offers short training times. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced data, the dataset characteristics do not emphasize imbalance. Thus, VAE emerges as the most balanced choice for the given dataset, prioritizing both scalability and dataset alignment." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and constraints. It is well-suited for tabular and noisy data, has a strong capability to handle high dimensionality, is scalable to large datasets, and offers a short training time. Although it requires high memory, which is a drawback, VAE stands out for its strengths in handling core dataset characteristics like large size, tabular form, and noise while needing less memory compared to alternatives that also match the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected as it handles tabular data well and is suitable for large datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset properties. Despite the low memory requirement, VAE's compatibility with large datasets and noisy data, as well as short training times, make it a suitable choice given the other models have more significant drawbacks with respect to noisy data or low-signal data handling." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it is well-suited for large tabular datasets with noisy data, a characteristic of the provided dataset. Additionally, VAE can utilize a GPU, allowing it to handle large datasets efficiently. Although it typically requires high memory, its short training time makes it a feasible choice given the constraints. It\u2019s important to note that VAE may struggle with discrete or categorical data, which is not mentioned as a characteristic of the dataset, making it a compatible choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice as it handles large datasets effectively and performs well on tabular data, which fits the dataset properties. Although it requires high memory, it can manage noisy data and offers short training times. Other models like AE1SVM and ALAD also support large datasets and tabular data but have weaknesses related to noisy data or low memory. VAE stands out with its strengths aligning closely to the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it handles tabular and noisy data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It also scales well to large datasets and has a short training time, which suits the 'large' data size requirement. Although it has a weakness in handling low memory, it is the best choice given the need for handling noisy and low-signal data in large tabular datasets." + } + ], + "letter": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized datasets and works well with tabular data. It is particularly advantageous for scenarios requiring low memory usage, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. VAE also excels in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, providing short training times, which enhances its applicability for a medium-scale tabular dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the dataset as it supports tabular data, which is the type of data in this case. It also handles high dimensionality and noisy data, which might be present in the dataset, and has a short training time, making it efficient for medium-sized data. Although it requires high memory, which is a limitation given the low memory requirement, its compatibility with the dataset type and medium data size makes it favorable compared to other models. Other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, and MO-GAAL have greater weaknesses with tabular data or memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and it is capable of handling medium data sizes effectively. Additionally, it offers low memory usage, a crucial factor considering the additional requirements of the dataset. LUNAR's short training time and scalability to large datasets are further advantageous, making it a strong candidate for the given dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and medium-sized datasets, which aligns with our dataset's properties. It efficiently handles high dimensionality and offers fast training times while requiring GPU resources, fitting the requirement of low memory usage. Although it uses high memory, its other strengths closely match the dataset's characteristics, making it the most suitable choice among the listed models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized and primarily tabular, and there is a requirement for low memory usage. Among the models, AutoEncoder is one of the few that explicitly supports tabular data well. Although high memory usage is a weakness mentioned, the medium data size implies that memory usage will be more manageable. AutoEncoder also benefits from short training times and scalability, making it a practical choice for a medium-sized dataset with the potential need for scalability. This makes AutoEncoder the best choice among the available options considering the constraints and characteristics specified." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is capable of handling medium-sized datasets efficiently and supports low memory usage due to its short training time. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, allowing for potential future extensions in dataset size. The model's ability to work with high dimensionality and noisy data aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite a weakness in handling small data sizes, it is not a concern here given the medium data size of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized datasets and works well with tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which can be advantageous given the unspecified characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, the VAE model supports short training times and can scale to large datasets, fitting the low memory requirement better than models with high memory needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized with tabular data, requiring a model that supports low memory usage. VAE is well-suited for tabular data, as it is designed for high dimensionality and can handle noisy data well. Although VAE traditionally requires high memory, its compatibility with tabular data outweighs this downside given the alternatives. Moreover, it offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it a suitable choice for the requirements specified." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets and has strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data. It is also capable of short training times and scalability to large datasets, which fits the dataset's requirement. Although VAE requires high memory, it is the closest match among the model list for handling tabular data with good performance characteristics suited for the provided dataset properties. Other models have weaknesses in handling tabular data or low memory requirements more explicitly." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is highly suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It is capable of handling medium-sized datasets efficiently due to its strength in scalability to large datasets. Additionally, VAE has a short training time, which meets the low memory requirement of the dataset. Despite its weakness in handling discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, the dataset's tags do not indicate these challenges, making VAE an appropriate choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is highly suitable for tabular data and can efficiently handle medium-sized datasets. It supports tabular data and has a short training time, making it ideal given the requirement for low memory usage. Although it can be computationally intensive, its ability to operate on tabular data with necessary scalability aligns well with the dataset needs. Additionally, LUNAR's strength in handling sparse and imbalanced data could be beneficial depending on the dataset characteristics. Its strengths align with the dataset properties and additional requirements better than other models in the provided list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is characterized as medium-sized tabular data with low memory requirements. VAE is well-suited for tabular data and large datasets, providing short training times, which is beneficial given the need for low memory usage. Despite having high memory usage in its weakness, VAE's ability to handle high dimensionality and its strength in dealing with tabular data make it a suitable choice compared to other models, which have more substantial weaknesses with tabular data or low memory environments." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular data, aligning well with the dataset's properties. It supports low memory usage and possesses strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which fits the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for this medium-sized tabular dataset with a requirement for low memory usage. It has strengths in handling tabular data and medium datasets efficiently while providing short training times. Although it typically requires high memory, it is the best compromise considering other models either do not handle tabular data well or have significant weaknesses related to low memory or small datasets which do not align as closely with the dataset tags and requirements as VAE does." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular data and aligns well with the low memory requirement, which is a stated need for the dataset. It has strengths in handling tabular data and offers short training time with relatively efficient memory usage, making it a suitable choice. While it may have weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data, this was not specified as a dataset characteristic, and it supports high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized and consists of tabular data, with a requirement for low memory consumption. Among the potential models, VAE stands out as it supports tabular data well, performs efficiently with high dimensionality, and is suited for medium to larger datasets with a short training time. While it typically requires higher memory, its other strengths align closely with the dataset needs, and it is more applicable to tabular data compared to most other models in the list. VAE also balances well against its weaknesses, which are less of a concern here given the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable due to its compatibility with tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. It handles sparse and imbalanced data well, which is beneficial for the dataset characteristics, even though specific characteristics aren't listed. Although it is labeled as high memory, LUNAR supports low-dimensional datasets, aligning with the dataset's low memory requirement. It also boasts a short training time, which is advantageous for efficiency given the 'medium' data size. Its ability to scale to large datasets aligns well with possible future dataset expansions." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the best choice since it has strengths in handling medium-sized, tabular data with high dimensionality while supporting GPU processing, which aligns well with the dataset properties. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which could bring future scalability benefits despite the current medium size requirement. Though it requires high memory, its short training time compensates for this during processing. Other models either have significant weaknesses with tabular data or suffer from memory issues and not being scalable." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. It handles tabular data effectively, works well with high dimensionality, has a relatively short training time, and manages noisy data. Although it has a high memory requirement, it supports large datasets and GPU acceleration, which can mitigate memory constraints. Other models either have significant weaknesses with tabular data or require low memory, scalability issues, or long training times." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and is effective on medium-sized datasets. It also has strengths in handling high-dimensional and noisy data, which might align well with the needs of the dataset, and it offers short training times. Although it has a high memory requirement, VAE is capable of handling large datasets, making it suitable for medium-sized datasets that aim for low memory usage, more so than the other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is a suitable choice as it works well with medium-sized tabular datasets, aligning with one of the strengths 'tabular data'. It also has the ability to handle high-dimensional data and is scalable to large datasets, which fits the medium data size requirement. Moreover, VAE offers short training times, which is beneficial given the requirement for low memory usage. It does not possess strengths specifically disqualified by weaknesses related to medium data size with low memory, unlike other models that face serious memory constraints or are inefficient with tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it is specifically strong with tabular data, which matches the dataset type. VAE can handle medium-sized datasets efficiently and offers short training time, aligning well with the low memory requirement. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, this model is most well-suited among the options given the dataset's additional requirement for low memory and the nature of the tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized and consists of tabular data with a requirement for low memory usage. The AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data and has strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data, which might be relevant here. It offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, which align with a medium data size requirement. While the AutoEncoder requires high memory, it is the best option among the models listed that fits the tabular data type and has the least conflict with the requirement for low memory, as other models have more significant weaknesses or aren't suited to tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also has strengths in handling tabular data and works well with GPUs, accommodating the 'low memory' requirement by supporting short training times. Although high memory can be a potential weakness, the VAE provides a good balance considering the dataset's needs, in contrast to other models like AnoGAN and AE1SVM that have more significant weaknesses related to the dataset's properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it specifically supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also capable of handling sparse and imbalanced data effectively, aligning with potential dataset characteristics. Furthermore, LUNAR excels with low-dimensional data, and the short training time requirement fits the additional criteria of low memory usage. These strengths make it more aligned with the dataset's needs compared to other models in the list, which are either unsuitable for tabular data or have high memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the best choice given the dataset properties and model characteristics. The dataset is medium-sized tabular data and requires a model with low memory consumption. LUNAR is explicitly designed for tabular data, offers short training times, and scales well to large datasets. Although it has weaknesses related to high memory, in the context of medium data size and the requirement for tabular data processing, LUNAR's strengths align closely with the dataset needs, unlike other models which have significant weaknesses such as low memory or are not suited for tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, aligns with the medium-sized dataset requirement, and offers low memory usage while also being scalable to large datasets. It addresses high dimensionality and noisy data, which could be relevant to the dataset characteristics. Despite its weaknesses with certain data types like discrete or categorical data, VAEs generally handle tabular data well when numerical data is predominant." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model as it has strengths in handling tabular data and medium-sized datasets, aligning well with the dataset properties. Additionally, it efficiently works with high-dimensional data and requires low memory, which matches the dataset's requirements. Although it may not perform optimally with discrete or categorical data, this is a lesser concern compared to its well-suited nature for the other dataset properties. This makes VAE the optimal choice despite its dependence on well-tuned hyperparameters." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset consists of medium-sized tabular data, with a requirement for low memory usage. The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the medium data size. It provides short training times which is beneficial in terms of resource efficiency. Although AutoEncoder typically requires higher memory, its strengths in processing tabular data with scalability and short training times make it a more balanced choice compared to other models, whose weaknesses more seriously conflict with the dataset requirements, such as low memory or unsuitability for tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset consists of medium-sized tabular data with a requirement for low memory usage. Among the models listed, VAE is highlighted for its strengths in handling tabular data and its suitability for medium to large datasets. Although it typically requires high memory, it is still more suited than other models due to its short training time and capability to manage high-dimensional data. Other models like AE1SVM, ALAD, and AutoEncoder also excel in tabular data but have weaknesses related to low memory which aligns with VAE better than other available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Additionally, it supports medium-sized datasets with short training time requirements and is scalable to large datasets. Despite its need for high memory, VAE compensates with the use of GPU, allowing it to handle more complex data without significant memory concerns. These features match the requirements of low memory usage and medium data size, making VAE the most suitable model for the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is well-suited for tabular data and can handle high-dimensional, noisy data with short training times, making it efficient for medium-sized datasets. While it requires high memory, VAE is among the few models that are compatible with the dataset properties, providing a balance between performance and capability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the given dataset properties as it is strong with tabular data, which fits the dataset type. It has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it compatible with a medium-sized dataset. Despite using high memory, VAE does not list low memory as a weakness, making it a viable option considering the additional requirement of low memory. Furthermore, the VAE model aligns with the need for handling noisy data, whereas other models like AnoGAN, SO-GAAL, AE1SVM, and ALAD particularly mention tabular data as a weakness." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also handles low-dimensional datasets and is scalable to large datasets, aligning with the medium data size of the dataset. LUNAR's capability of short training time meets the low memory requirement of the dataset. While LUNAR does have high memory as a weakness, this is mitigated by its strengths in handling tabular data efficiently compared to other models. Additionally, LUNAR does not have weaknesses related to tabular data, making it a strong candidate given the dataset properties. Other models, such as AnoGAN and AE1SVM, have significant weaknesses in low memory environments, which were emphasized as additional requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is of medium size and tabular in nature, with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is suitable for tabular data and is efficient with regard to memory usage, especially when compared to other options that are typically more memory-intensive. It also handles high-dimensionality and noisy data well, which aligns with potential characteristics of the dataset. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, it is a strong fit given the current dataset properties and constraints, particularly in terms of supporting tabular data and offering a short training time." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Dataset Tags indicate the need for a model suitable for medium-sized tabular data and with low memory requirements. VAE is a suitable choice because it directly supports tabular data, is efficient with high-dimensional data, and requires short training time, which can be beneficial for low memory settings. While VAE does have a weakness with high memory usage, it offers short training time, making it manageable in medium-sized datasets. It is the best fit among available options despite its minor drawbacks in memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with a requirement for low memory consumption. AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and offers short training times which are advantageous for medium-sized datasets. While AutoEncoder might generally require high memory, it does not have low memory as a weakness, unlike some other models in the list. Additionally, AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets, ensuring flexibility in handling the size needs of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data and medium-sized datasets, which aligns well with the dataset properties. It handles tabular data effectively, and although it has high memory usage, it boasts a short training time and scalability to larger datasets, which can be beneficial given the dataset's medium size. While the dataset requires low memory, VAE's benefits align well with the strengths of the data, making it a strong candidate among the given options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium sized and tabular, and there is a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is suitable for tabular data and can handle high dimensionalities with the potential for short training times. Despite its higher memory usage listed as a weakness, its overall strengths in handling tabular data make it the best fit among the provided models, especially given the dataset's characteristics and absence of other models perfectly matching low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with a low memory requirement. Among the listed models, AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data and has strengths in handling noisy data, high dimensionality, and providing short training times. It is also scalable to large datasets, which aligns with medium dataset size. Although AutoEncoder requires high memory, among the available models, it aligns best with the dataset requirements due to its compatibility with tabular data and its efficiency in handling medium-sized datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is a suitable model for the given dataset properties due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. It also supports medium data sizes and has low memory requirements, aligning with the need for low memory usage. Furthermore, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it a good fit for the medium-sized dataset. Unlike other models with weaknesses in memory usage and/or tabular data, LUNAR aligns well with all the key dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable for the given dataset properties. It handles tabular data well, which matches the dataset type. VAE also requires medium data size, which is compatible with the dataset size. Although it typically demands high memory, it provides short training times and can scale to large datasets, making it an efficient choice considering the additional requirement of low memory. Despite weaknesses such as issues with discrete data or imbalanced data, these do not conflict directly with the dataset's characteristics making VAE a fitting option." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset consists of medium-sized tabular data with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is suitable for tabular data and works well with medium to large datasets, which aligns with the given data size. Although it usually requires high memory, it is preferred due to its strengths in handling tabular data and short training time, which can be beneficial if memory can be optimized or managed. The low memory constraint was difficult to satisfy perfectly with the options available, but VAE remains the closest match among the models provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and has the additional advantage of being able to handle imbalanced and sparse data effectively. It also benefits from a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the requirement for low memory usage. Despite its hyperparameter sensitivity and high memory weakness, it fits well for a medium-sized tabular dataset while supporting the low memory necessity more than the other options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is suitable for medium-sized tabular data as it has strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also has short training time and is scalable to large datasets while being compatible with GPU acceleration, which is beneficial for meeting the low memory requirement. Although its weaknesses include small data size, it is not an issue with the medium data size provided. Other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, and AE1SVM have weaknesses specifically in tabular data or low memory constraints that do not align well with the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is best suited for the given dataset properties because it is adept at handling tabular data and medium-sized datasets, which aligns well with the dataset tags of 'medium' and 'tabular data'. Additionally, AutoEncoder can work efficiently with 'low memory', fulfilling the additional requirement, while providing strengths in scenarios involving high dimensionality and noisy data. Although it has weaknesses with small data size, it remains scalable to medium datasets, making it the most suitable choice given the characteristics of this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data, which is the main type of data in the given dataset. It handles medium-sized datasets effectively and operates efficiently with a GPU, which aligns well with the 'low memory' requirement. Additionally, it offers short training times suitable for the dataset's characteristics. While it may not be the best with imbalanced or sparse data, the dataset provided does not prioritize these attributes, making VAE a good match given the circumstances." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized and consists of tabular data, with a requirement for low memory usage. Among the models, VAE is suitable for tabular data and supports medium dataset sizes, fitting well with the dataset's properties. Although VAE is not inherently low memory, it presents a balanced option with its additional strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, alongside its capability for short training times. Other models either have significant weaknesses in tabular data, such as AnoGAN, or involve high memory usage and are not explicitly optimized for low memory environments which could be mitigated in the VAE's architecture." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is a suitable choice because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and is efficient in handling high-dimensional data with low memory requirements. While it requires high memory, it meets the criteria of low training time and scalability, which aligns with the dataset's medium size and need for low memory usage. Other models like AE1SVM and ALAD also handle tabular data well, but they have weaknesses with low memory, making VAE the better fit given its strengths and alignment with the dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is well-suited for tabular data of medium size, which matches this dataset's characteristics. VAE excels at handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset tags. Despite its known weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these are not primary concerns given the dataset description. Additionally, VAE operates with relatively low memory compared to some other models, making it suitable for this requirement as long as the high memory demand isn't excessive. The short training time and scalability fit well with the dataset's medium size." + } + ], + "musk": [ + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for high-dimensional and tabular data, which fits the dataset characteristics. Despite its weakness in CPU environments, its strengths in handling high dimensionality, sparse data, and short training time align well with the dataset's requirements. Additionally, AE1SVM's ability to work with medium-sized datasets and its scalability makes it an appropriate choice for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, high-dimensional, and in tabular format with a requirement for CPU capability. The AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data and can handle high dimensionality well. While it usually performs better on a GPU, it can operate within a CPU setting if necessary, and it does not have critical weaknesses that directly conflict with the dataset properties. Despite its GPU preference, the short training time and scalability to large datasets make it a fitting choice given the medium data size and tabular nature." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and has high dimensionality, with a need for CPU compatibility. The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data and handles high dimensionality effectively. It offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset size. Despite having a weakness regarding CPU use, the AutoEncoder's strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data make it the most appropriate choice among the provided models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It handles high dimensionality effectively and supports tabular data. Despite its weakness with CPU and long training times, its overall strengths, including high dimensionality, scalability to large datasets, and applicability to tabular data, make it a better fit than other models which either lack in tabular data support or are suboptimal for CPU usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data with high dimensionality and efficiently handles noisy data. It is optimized for high memory environments and has a short training time, making it a good fit for working on CPU despite its preference for GPU. The weakness regarding CPU usage is less critical compared to its strengths appropriate for the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for medium-sized, high dimensional tabular data as it explicitly lists tabular data and high dimensionality as its strengths. Additionally, despite its weakness on CPU, it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics, and it has a short training time, making it efficient for medium datasets. The model also supports scalability to large datasets, which is advantageous if the data size increases." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is best suited for the given dataset properties as it specifically supports tabular data and efficiently handles high dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It has strengths in short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns with the medium data size of the dataset. While it performs best on GPU, its capability with tabular data in high-dimensional settings outweighs its weakness on CPU usage compared to the alternatives." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and high-dimensional, with a requirement for CPU. AutoEncoder supports tabular and high-dimensional data effectively and is scalable to large datasets. While it often utilizes GPU, its strengths align well with the dataset tags compared to other models in the list. This choice balances the dataset's characteristics and the need for scalability, despite the CPU requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It excels in handling imbalanced and sparse data, offers short training time, and scalability to large datasets. Although AE1SVM has a weakness in using CPU and handling noisy data, the dataset does not particularly emphasize these factors, making it a strong candidate for the given requirements. Additionally, AE1SVM supports medium data sizes, aligning well with the dataset's constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the best choice for this dataset because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, a key characteristic of the dataset provided. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, and offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is advantageous given the 'medium' data size. Although it prefers a GPU environment, which is a typical situation, its ability to process tabular data effectively makes it the most appropriate option from the list. It also supports efficient training and data reconstruction tasks pertinent in similar data domains." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset as it performs well with high dimensionality and tabular data, which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and requires only short training times, which is beneficial given the CPU requirement. Although AE1SVM generally utilizes GPU and high memory, it has strengths in high dimensionality and tabular data, making it a fitting choice for this medium-sized dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice given its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, AE1SVM is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the medium dataset size. While it is not the best for CPU-only environments, its overall fit considering tabular data and high dimensionality makes it the best candidate among the provided options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected because it is highly suitable for tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It also supports handling noisy data and has a short training time, making it efficient for medium-sized datasets. Furthermore, it is scalable to large datasets and performs well with GPU acceleration, although a CPU will be used per the requirements. While it does have a weakness with CPU, its strengths in handling high dimensional tabular data outweigh this factor compared to the other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized with tabular data characterized by high dimensionality, and the requirement for CPU usage. The AutoEncoder model is a strong fit due to its suitability for tabular data and high dimensionality. It handles noisy data effectively and has a short training time, which compensates for potential CPU limitations. While it is primarily optimized for GPU, its scalability to large datasets and compatibility with tabular data make it the most appropriate choice given the dataset characteristics. Despite the CPU limitation, its strengths align well with the dataset's needs compared to other models on the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also supports handling noisy data and is efficient with a GPU, providing short training times and scalability to large datasets. Despite its weakness with CPU usage, its strengths significantly match the dataset characteristics, making it the most suitable choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics provided. Although it requires GPU and typically runs with high memory, it benefits from short training times and scalability to large datasets. Importantly, its strengths cover high-dimensional tabular data on CPU if necessary, matching the constraint not explicitly depending on GPU resources. While AE1SVM has some issues with CPU preference, its ability to handle high-dimensional tabular data and short training time makes it the most appropriate choice given the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data and handles high dimensionality well, which aligns with the dataset properties. Although it has a weakness with CPU requirements, it stands out for providing short training times, capability with large datasets, and good performance on tabular data, making it a better fit for the dataset needs compared to others that are more GPU-dependent or suited for other dataset types." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is suitable for medium-sized tabular data with high dimensionality and can handle noisy data. Although it generally prefers GPU, it is more advantageous than other models since it is scalable to large datasets, provides short training times, and excels in high-dimensional scenarios, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics despite the preference for CPU." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is well-suited for the given dataset as it efficiently handles tabular data with high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it excels in dealing with sparse and imbalanced data, and is capable of processing a medium-sized dataset effectively. Although it has a weakness regarding CPU usage, it compensates with its strengths like short training time and scalability, making it the most suitable model among the provided options, especially given its strengths with tabular data and high dimensionality." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It also supports short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it suitable for medium-sized data. While it has a weakness related to CPU performance, the strengths in dealing with tabular data and high dimensionality make it the best match among the given options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice because it aligns well with the dataset's characteristics, such as being medium-sized, containing tabular data, and having high dimensionality. Despite the preference for GPU, the dataset requires CPU compatibility, but AutoEncoder's strength in handling high-dimensional tabular data, scalability to large datasets, and short training time offsets this limitation with acceptable compromise compared to the weaknesses of the other models. Other models either lack support for tabular data or have training time/scalability issues, making AutoEncoder the best-fit model from the given list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is a suitable model for medium-sized, high-dimensional tabular data. It aligns well with the dataset's characteristics, such as high dimensionality and tabular data. VAE's strengths include handling tabular data and high-dimensional data effectively, despite some weaknesses with CPU usage. Its short training time and suitability for high-dimensional datasets make it an ideal choice over other models which are more suited for GPU use or have constraints on data type or size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is suitable for the given dataset properties as it excels with tabular data and high dimensionality, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. It also has a short training time and scales well to large datasets, which is beneficial given the medium data size. Although the dataset requires models that can leverage a CPU, the strengths in handling tabular and high-dimensional data make AutoEncoder a fitting choice despite its GPU preference." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected because it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It also handles noisy data efficiently and can work with medium-sized datasets, offering short training times. While it generally requires a GPU, which may not align perfectly with the CPU requirement, its overall strengths and ability to work with high-dimensional tabular data make it the most suitable choice given the options. Other models have significant weaknesses with tabular data, high dimensionality, or CPU constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data and handles high dimensionality well. It also has a short training time, which is beneficial for medium-sized datasets processed on CPU. While there is a weakness with CPU, its overall strengths outweigh this, especially given the dataset's focus on tabular high dimensional data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is particularly suitable for the given dataset properties as it is strong in handling high dimensional tabular data and is effective on medium-sized datasets. It capitalizes on its strengths in high dimensionality and works well with tabular data, matching well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its weakness of needing a GPU, other models on the list also predominantly rely on GPUs. AE1SVM offers short training times and scalability to large datasets, fitting the computational requirement of using a CPU effectively, hence making it the best choice for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it handles tabular data and high dimensionality effectively, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Although VAE is typically optimized for GPU, it accommodates high dimensionality and is performant for medium-sized datasets. Additionally, VAE is known for its short training time and ability to handle large datasets, making it an optimal choice for a medium-sized dataset with high dimensionality without an immediate need for CPU-specific optimization." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for a medium-sized tabular dataset with high dimensionality while using CPU. It is well-suited for tabular data and high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Moreover, AE1SVM's ability to handle sparse and imbalanced data adds robustness to the selection, despite its weakness with CPU utilization. Given its strengths in these areas and short training time, it matches the dataset requirements better than the other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset because it handles tabular data well and excels with high dimensionality, which are characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, AE1SVM is capable of using a CPU, which aligns with the requirement, even though it generally prefers GPU. Its strengths include handling sparse and imbalanced data, which, while not explicitly mentioned in the dataset tags, could be beneficial if such characteristics are present. Despite requiring high memory and being generally GPU-optimized, the compatibility with CPU environments makes it a better choice over others, which have CPU explicitly as a weakness." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for handling medium-sized tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It has strengths in processing tabular data, high dimensional datasets, and it can efficiently handle noisy data. While it is optimized for GPU, its ability to handle high dimensionality and noise with a short training time makes it the most suitable choice among models listed, despite the additional CPU requirement, compared to other models whose weaknesses include handling tabular data or CPU limitations." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. The dataset has medium data size, tabular data format, high dimensionality, and needs to be processed on a CPU. AE1SVM excels at handling high dimensionality and tabular data, and it is scalable to large datasets. Although its strength lies in GPU usage, its capability in managing high dimensionality and short training time makes it a good fit. Other models either have weaknesses with tabular data or require GPU processing, or are not suited for CPU-oriented environments." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset based on its compatibility with the dataset characteristics. The dataset is tabular, medium-sized, and has high dimensionality, which aligns well with AE1SVM's strengths. It is good at handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and can be scaled to large datasets. While it has a weakness related to CPU, which is a requirement, the model's strengths in handling tabular data and scalability outweigh this, making it the best choice among the given options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it excels in handling tabular data with high dimensionality, which is a key characteristic of the dataset. It supports medium-sized datasets and offers short training times, making it efficient for CPU environments. Additionally, its capability to handle noisy data and scalability to large datasets align well with the dataset's properties and computational requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the best choice for this dataset because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it has strengths in addressing imbalanced data, which might be useful in tabular datasets. While it generally relies on GPU for optimal performance, it has some flexibility and can work with medium data size and requires limited scalability, allowing for potential CPU execution with short training time. The model's ability to manage various domains, including technology and finance, makes it adaptable to 'others' domains, offering a balance between strengths and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is strong in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite its weakness in CPU usage, its strengths in short training time, scalability to large datasets, and capability to process medium-sized datasets make it the ideal choice. AE1SVM also supports imbalanced and sparse data, which, although not explicitly mentioned in the dataset tags, could be beneficial. Compared to other models, AE1SVM presents the best balance of strengths that align with the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well suited for high dimensional tabular data as indicated in the dataset properties. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and works well with tabular data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, AutoEncoder has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which fits the requirement for utilizing CPU resources efficiently, even though it is primarily optimized for GPU usage. Its minor inefficiencies related to CPU are outweighed by its alignment with the key dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The AE1SVM model is the most suitable choice as it handles high dimensional data well, which is a characteristic of the dataset. It supports tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset, and is capable for use cases on CPU. While it has a weakness related to noisy data and CPU, other models have more significant weaknesses in areas critical to the dataset such as 'CPU compatibility' and 'high dimensionality'. Additionally, AE1SVM has strengths in handling sparse data and can scale to large datasets which aligns with a 'medium' dataset size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model as it is particularly strong with high dimensional tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. It is efficient for medium-sized datasets, provides quick training times, and is appropriate for high-dimensional problems. While it mentions CPU as a weakness, its compatibility with tabular data, short training times, and ability to handle high dimensionality make it a good fit given the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is chosen as it is suitable for tabular data and handles high dimensionality well, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also supports medium data size and can operate efficiently under CPU constraints, despite being optimized for GPU. Additionally, it has strengths in handling noisy data and provides a scalable solution for datasets that aren't small, while offering a short training time." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it excels in handling high-dimensional and tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It supports high dimensionality and is well-suited for tabular data, as required. Additionally, while AE1SVM performs better with GPUs, it is a good choice for high-dimensional data on CPU, making it the best fit given the CPU requirement mentioned in the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset has medium size, high dimensionality, and is tabular, with a preference for CPU usage. The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for tabular data, high dimensionality, and can handle noisy data effectively. Although it is optimized for GPU, its strengths align well with the dataset's characteristics. While AutoEncoder generally requires high memory, it is still a good fit given the dataset is medium-sized and the primary requirement is for it to run on CPU which can be a trade-off for the weakness." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it is well-suited for handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it performs well with CPU and has a short training time while providing scalability to large datasets, matching the dataset's medium size requirement. Although it has some weaknesses with noisy data, this is not a primary concern given the dataset's description." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is most suitable for the given dataset as it handles high dimensionality and tabular data well, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it performs well with imbalanced data which could be a concern, and though it normally uses GPU, it's scalable to large datasets with a short training time. Its primary weakness related to CPU dependency is less impactful here since other strengths outweigh the others." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It effectively handles tabular data and high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it supports GPU usage and has a short training time, making it compatible with CPU requirements when not specifically needing high memory. AE1SVM's strengths with high dimensionality, sparse data, imbalanced data, and scalability to large datasets perfectly match the dataset's characteristics and additional requirements, making it a very good choice compared to other models that have limitations on CPU or tabular datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for medium-sized, high-dimensional, tabular data using CPU resources. It is strong in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. While it is generally GPU-optimized, its additional strengths outweigh this, as it is scalable to large datasets and offers short training time. Unlike other models, AE1SVM doesn't explicitly require a GPU, making it adaptable for CPU needs while effectively managing high-dimensional tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is chosen because it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which are characteristics of the given dataset. Additionally, AE1SVM has strengths in dealing with imbalanced and sparse data, and it can be scaled to large datasets. Despite its weakness with CPU usage, AE1SVM provides a good balance of strengths specifically aligned with the dataset requirements when considering the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice for the given dataset as it supports high dimensional tabular data, which is a key aspect of the dataset. Although its strengths are typically GPU-oriented, it also has short training times which can mitigate CPU limitations. It is well-suited for handling tabular data and has strength in managing high dimensionality, making it ideal for the dataset at hand. Despite CPU preference being a weakness, AE1SVM compensates with its other strengths relevant to the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular datasets with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset properties. It handles high dimensionality effectively and is scalable to large datasets. Although it usually benefits from GPU, it does not have a major strength or weakness associated with CPU, making it a reasonable choice given the requirement. Additionally, it offers a short training time, which is beneficial for medium datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "Deep SVDD", + "reason": "Deep SVDD is well-suited for high dimensional datasets and can handle tabular data effectively. It leverages GPU acceleration and scales to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset's medium size and requirement for high dimensionality. While high memory is a consideration, the absence of a specific need for low memory allows for leveraging Deep SVDD's strengths effectively over its weaknesses, making it a suitable choice over other models in the list that either do not well-support tabular data, have prohibitive weaknesses on CPU, or have other disqualifying weaknesses for this specific scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and its compatibility with tabular data. Additionally, it supports CPU-based processing, which aligns with the additional requirement of CPU. While it has weaknesses in terms of long training time on CPUs and handling simple linear patterns, the given dataset's characteristics of medium size and the nature of the data as tabular make AE1SVM a strong candidate, given its strengths outweigh its weaknesses in this context." + } + ], + "vowels": [ + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it excels with tabular data, requires short training time, and is scalable to large datasets. It also handles imbalanced and sparse data well, which aligns with the dataset's low-signal and low memory requirements. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data, LUNAR offers a balanced trade-off among the models listed for the provided dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected as it aligns well with the dataset properties. It is specifically strong with tabular data and a medium data size. Although it generally prefers high memory, it features short training times which might mitigate memory constraints. Furthermore, while it does have weaknesses regarding imbalanced data and real-time data, these do not conflict directly with the dataset properties provided, making it a suitable choice. Its strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality fit well with the dataset requirements despite the low-signal nature of the data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It supports tabular data, which aligns with our dataset type, and handles low memory requirements with short training time. Despite its weakness with discrete or categorical data, the dataset characteristics like 'low-signal data' and 'medium size' are not directly contradicted by the VAE. While it does require high memory, its strength in tabular data and efficient handling of high dimensionality make it the best fit compared to other models that have more significant weaknesses with low-signal data or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it can effectively handle tabular data, which is one of the strengths of the model. Despite the low-signal data being a concern, VAE is compatible with medium-sized datasets and has a short training time, aligning well with the low memory requirement. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets which offers room for future data growth. Although it might face challenges with imbalanced data and requires high memory, the overall characteristics of VAE align better with the given dataset properties compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data and performs well on medium-sized datasets, which fits the dataset tag properties. Despite the low-signal characteristic of the data, VAE's robustness in handling noisy and high-dimensional data can help uncover valuable insights. It also aligns with the requirement for low memory usage compared to many other listed models. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it a good fit for the constraints and characteristics detailed in the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and performs well with medium-sized datasets, which align with the dataset properties. While it is noted for high memory usage, it compensates with a short training time and scalability to large datasets. Moreover, it does not have a weakness for low-signal data, which is important given the dataset characteristic. In comparison to other models, VAE covers the dataset requirements more closely while avoiding critical weaknesses that conflict with the data characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and has low-signal data characteristics with a low memory requirement. VAE supports tabular data and handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, fitting the dataset type and characteristics. Despite its high memory usage, VAE's ability to handle medium data sizes with a short training time makes it the most appropriate model compared to others which either do not handle tabular data well or have weaknesses with low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It efficiently handles medium-sized datasets with short training times and doesn't rely on high memory, which is suitable given the low memory requirement. Despite its weaknesses in handling discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, the focus on tabular data with short training times makes it the most appropriate choice given the dataset properties and overall constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice as it has strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. Additionally, it is capable of dealing with high dimensionality and has a short training time, which are beneficial for low-signal data. While it does have weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, the medium data size and low memory constraints can be managed effectively with VAE as it is scalable for large datasets and optimized for GPU, aligning well with the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for the given dataset properties which include tabular data and low-signal data. It is efficient with tabular data and works well with low-dimensional and sparse data. Although LUNAR typically requires high memory, it offers short training times and is scalable to large datasets, which balances well with maintaining low memory footprint through efficient resource management. The other models either have weaknesses with tabular data, low memory, or low-signal data, making LUNAR the most aligned choice based on the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It handles medium-sized datasets efficiently and has a short training time, which meets the 'low memory' requirement. Although it is not ideally suited for low-signal data, it offers a balance between the dataset needs and model capabilities in the given model list, unlike other models with significant weaknesses related to the dataset's key requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it handles tabular data well, which aligns with the dataset\u2019s data type. It has strengths in high dimensionality and short training time, which is suitable for the medium-sized dataset. Although it generally requires high memory, its ability to process tabular data with high dimensionality outweighs this weakness under the given constraints. Other models either have significant weaknesses in handling tabular data, low-signal data, or require low memory, which are crucial requirements for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It performs well with medium-sized datasets and supports high dimensionality, which is beneficial for low-signal data to extract meaningful patterns. VAE also has short training times and can handle noisy data well. While it may require high memory, it does not have explicit constraints on low memory. The other models either have significant weaknesses in handling tabular data or low-signal data, making VAE the best fit based on the given properties and analyses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for tabular data and can handle medium-sized datasets efficiently with a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of being medium-sized, low-signal, and requiring low memory usage. It also performs well with high dimensionality and noisy data, making it a fit for the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset characteristics include medium-sized tabular data with low-signal, and a requirement for low memory utilization. VAE is suitable for tabular data and can handle high dimensionality, which might be important for extracting meaningful patterns from low-signal data. Although VAE typically uses high memory, it is the best fit from the given options as it can handle large datasets and has a short training time, which is beneficial for resource constraints. Additionally, the low-signal data challenge can be mitigated by VAE's capability to model complex relationships in tabular datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which corresponds with the dataset's nature. It also offers a short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the 'medium' data size. Additionally, LUNAR accommodates low memory requirements, making it an appropriate choice given the low-memory constraint. Although it is not specifically noted for low-signal data, its overall compatibility with the dataset's properties makes it the best option among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular data and is known for its short training time and capability to handle high dimensionality and noisy data. While it typically requires high memory, its strengths align well with the dataset's characteristics, particularly its ability to work effectively with tabular data and manage low-signal conditions. Despite the low memory preference, VAE has a combination of strengths that match most of the dataset needs better than the other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data and can handle medium-sized datasets effectively. It demonstrates strengths in high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns well with the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset. Although VAE typically uses high memory, the low memory requirement is less emphasized than other constraints such as compatibility with tabular data and noisy data handling, making VAE the most aligned choice among the provided models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data and efficiently handles low-memory requirements, which are critical for the given dataset characteristics. It performs well with medium-sized datasets and is scalable to large datasets, matching the dataset's medium size. Additionally, LUNAR has strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data, which could provide better robustness in dealing with low-signal data characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a suitable choice because it specifically mentions strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the data type of the dataset. It also supports high dimensionality, which may be beneficial even if the dataset is medium-sized. The dataset requires low memory, and while VAE prefers high memory, it compensates with a short training time and scalability to larger datasets, which can be optimized to fit medium-sized data requirements. Additionally, its requirement for 'noisy data' aligns well with the low-signal characteristics of the dataset, providing robustness in signal extraction and data interpretation." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets with low memory requirements. It supports tabular data and is efficient in handling datasets with low signal due to its short training time and the capacity to deal with noisy data. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced data, this is not a primary concern in the given dataset properties. Additionally, its requirement for high memory is noted, but this is less problematic than other model weaknesses in the context of the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It has strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the data type provided. Although it requires high memory, it offers short training times, making it preferable for medium-sized datasets with low-signal characteristics. The weaknesses of the VAE, such as difficulties with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, are less concerning given the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, VAE is scalable to large datasets, which offers flexibility in case the dataset size increases in the future." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this scenario due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns well with the dataset's data type. It is well-suited for medium-sized datasets due to its scalability to large datasets and short training time. Moreover, it is tailored to handle low memory requirements, matching the additional requirements of the dataset. While it may suffer from hyperparameter sensitivity and high memory in other contexts, these concerns are mitigated by its alignment with the dataset's characteristics and requirements. Its ability to work with low-dimensional datasets also makes it appropriate given the low-signal data characteristic, despite this not being its primary strength." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset properties. It handles medium data sizes well, and although it has the weakness of requiring high memory, the dataset\u2019s requirement for low memory might be offset by VAE's short training time and scalability to large datasets. VAE's capability to work with high dimensionality and its short training time align well with the dataset\u2019s characteristics and additional requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the best choice for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and its capability to work with low-memory settings, making it well-suited for medium-sized datasets with low signal. While VAE is not ideal for discrete or categorical data, it aligns well with the dataset's requirement for low memory usage and has a short training time, accommodating the low-memory characteristic more effectively than other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is a suitable choice for this medium-sized tabular dataset with low memory requirements. It has strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and supports GPU for efficient processing. Despite the low-signal nature of the data, VAE can perform well with proper hyperparameter tuning. Other models either have weaknesses in dealing with tabular data, low-signal data, or have high memory requirements, making VAE the best option from the provided list for the given dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and possesses low-signal characteristics, with a low memory requirement. VAE is suitable for tabular data and possesses strengths in handling high-dimensional data and noisy data. Although VAE typically requires high memory, it doesn't feature specific weaknesses with respect to low memory, and it has a short training time which is beneficial for medium-sized datasets. Out of all the models, VAE matches most of the dataset requirements effectively while minimizing weaknesses relevant to the dataset's properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is a medium-sized tabular dataset with low-signal characteristics and a requirement for low memory usage. Among the models listed, VAE is suitable for tabular data and fits well with medium-sized datasets. Although VAE typically requires high memory, it has strengths in handling high-dimensional and noisy data, which can somewhat accommodate low-signal characteristics. Its short training time is beneficial given the memory constraints. Overall, VAE offers the best balance given the dataset features and the constraints listed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with a low-significance signal and low memory requirements. Among the models, AutoEncoder supports tabular data and manages medium-sized datasets efficiently. It also handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, which might be beneficial even for low-signal data, minimizing overfitting. Its capability to work with GPUs and short training times caters to potential computational constraints. Despite its weakness with low-signal data, its strengths align better with the dataset requirements compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type provided. It handles medium-sized data well, as it is scalable to large datasets. Although it has some weaknesses with low-signal data, it does not explicitly require high memory, thereby aligning with the low memory requirement. Its short training time also ensures efficiency, making it a balanced choice for tabular data with the dataset constraints provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice for this dataset as it is well-suited for tabular data and can handle medium-sized datasets with high dimensionality. Although VAE models have high memory requirements, they offer short training times and are scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's need for efficiency given its 'low memory' constraint. The low-signal characteristic of the dataset does not pose a critical challenge for VAE compared to other models, making it the best compromise given the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for the described dataset properties as it supports tabular data, aligns with the 'medium' data size, and is efficient in terms of training time which is helpful given the low memory requirements. It is also capable of handling high dimensional data, a common characteristic in tabular datasets. While VAE has weaknesses with imbalanced data, this is not a specified characteristic of the dataset, making it a viable option given the other constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for the given medium-sized tabular dataset with low signal and low memory requirements. VAE's strengths include handling tabular data and high dimensionality, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Furthermore, it has a short training time and is suitable for datasets not needing high memory, making it the best choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data, which matches the dataset characteristics. It excels with tabular data, has low memory requirements, can handle sparse and imbalanced data, and offers short training times along with scalability to large datasets. Despite its challenges with noisy data, the primary dataset requirement of low memory usage aligns well with LUNAR's strengths, making it the most appropriate choice given the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected as the most suitable model because it explicitly handles tabular data effectively and is well-suited for low-dimensional datasets, as indicated by the dataset's medium size. Despite being labeled as having a low signal, LUNAR is not specifically weak against this characteristic and offers advantages such as short training time and scalability to large datasets. Additionally, it works well under low-memory constraints, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets, which aligns well with the dataset properties provided. It has strength in handling tabular data and exhibits short training times, addressing the requirement for low memory usage. Despite its poor performance on discrete or categorical data, it doesn't have a specific disadvantage regarding low-signal data, which makes it a viable option for this particular dataset characteristic." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is chosen because it supports tabular data, aligns well with the medium data size, and does not have low memory constraints. Its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and short training time make it appropriate for the dataset characteristics, despite its minor weakness with low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular data and aligns with the dataset requirement for low memory usage. It offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which will efficiently handle the given 'low-signal data'. Although it has weaknesses with imbalanced and sparse data, these do not apply strongly to the specified dataset characteristics. VAE's strengths in handling tabular data, short training time, and compatibility with low-signal data make it the optimal choice from the provided list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it handles tabular data well, which aligns with the dataset type. Despite being low-signal data, VAE's ability to manage high-dimensional data and provide short training time makes it suitable for medium-sized datasets. Although VAE requires high memory, its suitability for tabular data and a good fit for the specifics of this dataset make it the best choice among the options considered." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and offers short training time, which is beneficial for a medium-sized dataset. VAE handles low-signal data without requiring large memory resources significantly better than other options, aligning with the dataset's additional requirement for low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen based on its strengths, which align with the dataset properties, particularly its suitability for tabular data and its ability to handle medium-sized datasets efficiently. Despite the low-signal characteristic, VAE provides good performance on tabular data when the focus is on capturing complex relationships rather than interpretability. Additionally, it supports GPU usage, which can optimize training times and memory usage, catering to the low memory requirement of the dataset. The short training time further aligns with the efficiency needs of this task." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the dataset as it is specifically strong with tabular data, which matches the data type requirement. It also performs well on medium-sized datasets and has strengths in handling sparse and low-dimensional data, which can align with low-signal characteristics. Furthermore, it requires low memory and has a short training time, catering to the dataset's additional requirement of low memory usage. While it is computationally intensive and sensitive to hyperparameters, its benefits outweigh these weaknesses given the dataset's characteristics and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the most suitable due to its strengths in handling tabular data and capacity for low memory consumption, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics, including being medium-sized and requiring low memory usage. Unlike other models, LUNAR does not have listed weaknesses related to low signals, making it a better fit compared to models like AutoEncoder or ALAD, which explicitly list low-signal data as a weakness." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset because it is strong in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Although the dataset is characterized by low-signal data, the key requirements are medium data size and low memory usage. VAE can process medium-sized datasets efficiently and has short training times, which meets the 'low memory' requirement. Additionally, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and its scalability to large datasets provide future-proofing in case the dataset grows." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the data type property of the dataset. Despite the dataset being low-signal and having a requirement for low memory, VAE is the most compatible choice from the list since it supports tabular data, provides short training times, and is scalable to medium datasets. Although VAE generally requires high memory and handles high dimensionality well, it is the more suitable option given the limitations of the other models. It strikes a balance by supporting appropriate data type and scalability, even with the memory consideration." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which is the primary data type in this scenario. It also demonstrates good performance on low-dimensional datasets and is known for short training times and scalability to large datasets, addressing the medium data size and low-memory requirements. Although it has weaknesses concerning noisy data, this is less critical here as the data is characterized as low-signal rather than noisy." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it handles tabular data efficiently, which aligns with the dataset's 'tabular data' tag. Despite its high memory requirement, it provides short training time and can process datasets of medium size effectively. VAE also accommodates noisy data well, allowing it to manage potential noise in the dataset. Other models either suffer from weaknesses related to tabular data or require lower memory usage, which would affect the model's performance given the additional requirement for low memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset characteristics mention tabular data and additional requirement for low memory, where LUNAR's strengths align well. It supports tabular data, is scalable to large datasets, and requires short training time which fits a medium dataset size. Although it has a high memory weakness, its strengths in handling low-dimensional and sparse data make it the most suitable option considering no other model perfectly aligns with all dataset requirements. Additionally, LUNAR's ability to handle imbalanced data, which is not explicitly required but still beneficial, further complements the choice in the presence of low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low signal and a requirement for low memory usage. LUNAR is suited for tabular data and should perform adequately with low-dimensional datasets. It has strengths in handling tabular and sparse data while providing a manageable training time and scalability to larger datasets, which is important for a medium-sized dataset. Although it has weaknesses in handling high memory requirements, it has an advantage in prioritizing tabular data and fast training time, which makes it a better fit compared to others that either require high memory or have significant weaknesses for low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is best suited for the given dataset properties as it excels with tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It supports imbalanced data and works well with low memory, addressing additional data characteristics and requirements. LUNAR also accommodates sparse data and has a short training time, making it efficient and scalable for medium-sized datasets. Although it is weak with noisy data, the dataset's primary concern appears to be low signal strength, which LUNAR is suited to handle." + } + ], + "optdigits": [ + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and characterized by high dimensionality, all of which align well with AutoEncoder's strengths. AutoEncoder is scalable to large datasets and efficient with high-memory requirements, addressing the dataset's CPU and high-memory tags. It also excels in handling high-dimensional tabular data, making it a suitable choice for this task. While some models like VAE and ALAD also perform well with high-dimensional tabular data, AutoEncoder's strengths in scalability, training time, and adaptability to large datasets make it the best fit." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which match the dataset characteristics. Additionally, AE1SVM is scalable to large datasets and supports high memory usage, aligning with the dataset requirements. While it has weaknesses in CPU usage, the dataset's attributes such as high dimensionality and large size are crucial factors where AE1SVM excels compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, high-dimensional, tabular data with high memory requirements. AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and high-dimensional datasets, supports GPU for enhanced performance, can handle large datasets efficiently, and is adept at dealing with noisy data. It also has short training times, which is advantageous for high memory requirements. Although it does not support CPU as a strength, it addresses most other key dataset needs better than alternative models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model given the dataset properties as it handles tabular data and high dimensionality well, which match the dataset tags. AE1SVM also supports large datasets, while accommodating high memory requirements and offers a short training time, aligning with the additional CPU and high memory constraints. Although GPU is a strength, the model's ability to handle high memory demands and high dimensionality in tabular data make it a suitable choice compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and high-dimensional, requiring a model capable of handling such characteristics. The AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and high-dimensionality, offers scalability to large datasets, and can manage noisy data effectively. Additionally, it benefits from short training times. While it is designed to utilize GPUs, the high memory attribute aligns with the dataset's requirement. Despite having weaknesses in CPU usage, high memory requirements are met with the dataset's memory capability, making it the best fit among the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, with high dimensionality, and has a requirement for high memory. The AutoEncoder is a model that is well-suited for high dimensionality and tabular data. It performs well with large datasets and can handle noisy data while being scalable, which matches the dataset properties closely. While it may require a GPU for optimal performance due to high memory usage, it doesn't have significant weaknesses that misalign with the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice as it effectively handles tabular data and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It is also scalable to large datasets and runs efficiently on high memory environments, addressing the dataset's large size and high-memory requirements. Additionally, it offers a short training time, making it practical for efficient processing, and it can manage noisy data, aligning well with the dataset's potential noise challenges." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and characterized by high dimensionality. AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data and high-dimensional datasets. It can efficiently handle large datasets, has a short training time, and is capable of working with noise, which matches the characteristics of the given dataset. Although the model's use of GPU might be a limitation given the CPU requirement, its high memory compatibility and scalability to large datasets make it the most suitable choice from the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the best choice because it is well-suited for high dimensionality and large tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It can handle noisy data efficiently and uses high memory, which fits the dataset's additional requirements. VAE also offers a short training time and scalability for large datasets, which are important given the dataset's large size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. It supports large datasets, is scalable, and benefits from high memory availability. Its ability to handle noisy data while utilizing GPU accelerations makes it a good fit for this scenario. Additionally, it offers short training times, which is beneficial when using CPU resources, even though CPUs are generally not its primary strength." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is best suited for the given dataset properties due to its strengths - handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets, while also being effective with tabular data. It aligns well with additional requirements for high memory usage. Despite certain weaknesses (e.g., some issues on CPU), its short training time and applicability to a wide domain of fields make it a strong fit for this large, high-dimensional tabular dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it is strong in handling high dimensionality, sparse and imbalanced data, which aligns with the dataset's high dimensionality tag. It is also capable of dealing with tabular data and scalable to large datasets. Additionally, AE1SVM requires high memory, which matches the dataset's requirement for high memory. While it typically utilizes GPU, it is governed by the requirement of using CPU, which does present a slight misalignment but is offset by its overall strengths with the data type and characteristics. The model's short training time is another beneficial attribute for handling large datasets efficiently." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for the dataset properties, which include large tabular datasets with high dimensionality that require high memory and processing on a CPU. The AutoEncoder's strengths in handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets, along with its suitability for tabular data and ability to use high memory, make it the best choice among the models. Additionally, it offers a short training time, which is advantageous given the high dimensionality of the data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is particularly well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, as it can handle high memory demands and is scalable to large datasets. It is also capable of handling noisy data efficiently. Despite the requirement for high memory, which is supported by the dataset requirements, the model's strength in high dimensionality and scalability makes it a strong candidate given the dataset characteristics, especially when run on a GPU. Other options either do not support tabular data well or have more significant weaknesses related to scalability or high memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is suitable for this large, high-dimensional tabular dataset as it handles high dimensionality well, supports tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets. It also aligns with the additional CPU and high memory requirements of the dataset. Despite its weakness of longer training times with CPU, its strengths far outweigh this, making it the best choice given the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The AE1SVM model is well-suited for handling high dimensionality and tabular data, both of which are characteristics of the dataset. It also supports high memory usage and can scale to large datasets, making it compatible with the 'large' data size tag. Despite the need for a CPU, AE1SVM stands out due to its strengths in dealing with the dataset's properties and requirements, particularly for tabular high-dimensional data and scalability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches the dataset characteristics. It also handles large datasets effectively and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it has a weakness in terms of CPU use, it compensates with its strengths in handling high dimensionality and scalability to large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for the dataset because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which aligns with our dataset properties. It is capable of scaling to large datasets and operates with high memory, meeting the CPU and high memory requirements of the dataset. Additionally, its strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data make it well-suited, and it offers short training times, allowing for efficient computation on large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, consists of tabular and high-dimensional data, and requires high memory with the ability to utilize a CPU. AutoEncoder supports high dimensionality and tabular data, is scalable to large datasets, offers high memory usage, and has short training times. Although primarily uses GPU, the capability for utilizing high memory aligns well with the CPU requirement. Its strengths outweigh its weaknesses in this context, making it the most suitable model for the given dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the most suitable choice because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also excels with large datasets, is suitable for high dimensionality, and can handle noisy data effectively. The model's capability to operate with high memory and short training time aligns well with the dataset's additional requirements. Although it typically utilizes a GPU for best performance, its scalability to large datasets makes it a strong candidate given the constraints. While it has weak support for CPU, its strengths outweigh this limitation for the given scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for the given dataset as it handles large tabular data efficiently, which is tagged with high dimensionality. It has the strengths of dealing with noisy data and scalability to large datasets, utilizing high memory and GPU efficiently, satisfying the dataset requirements. While it has a weakness of not performing well on datasets requiring CPU, in this scenario, other critical strengths like handling large, high-dimensional, tabular data outweigh this weakness, making it the best choice among the listed models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is suitable for this large, high-dimensional tabular dataset. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, and it is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it can handle noisy data and is compatible with high memory requirements, making it the best choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model due to its strengths aligning well with the dataset properties. It handles high dimensionality and tabular data effectively, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It also offers scalability for large datasets with high memory requirements, compatible with the CPU setting. Despite the CPU being a noted weakness, AE1SVM's overall alignment with the dataset's characteristics makes it the preferable choice over models with more pronounced weaknesses in tabular data processing or scalability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model for this dataset because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data well, both of which are key properties of the dataset. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and requires high memory, aligning with the CPU and high-memory requirements of the dataset. While it has a weakness for CPU usage, this weakness is shared with most models, and its strengths in critical areas make it the best fit overall." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it handles tabular data and high dimensionality well, which matches the dataset characteristics. It is scalable to large datasets and performs well on high-memory systems. Additionally, it has a short training time, making it efficient given the computational constraints, despite its weakness in handling CPU which is less critical given its other strengths align with the dataset's needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality, with requirements for high memory. AutoEncoder is well-suited for handling high-dimensional tabular data, scalable to large datasets, and is compatible with high memory usage on GPU. Additionally, it can handle noisy data and has a short training time, making it an optimal choice considering our dataset's properties and computational constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model as it handles high-dimensional tabular data effectively, offers scalability to large datasets, and can operate with high memory, which matches the dataset's large size and requirement for high memory usage. It is optimized for short training times on GPUs, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirements. While it primarily uses GPU resources, it covers key strengths like handling high dimensionality and noisy data, which are vital for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it handles tabular data effectively, supports high dimensionality, and is capable of scaling to large datasets. Additionally, it can manage noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. While the dataset requires high memory and relies on CPUs, the strengths of AutoEncoder in handling large, high-dimensional tabular data outweigh these weaknesses, making it the most fitting choice from the list provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality. It handles high memory requirements efficiently and offers scalability to large datasets. Furthermore, it supports noise tolerance, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. While it is designed for GPU, the CPU requirement of the dataset is not a major hindrance when compared to other models with more significant mismatches in weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large, high-dimensional tabular datasets and leverages the strengths of handling high-dimensional data with noisy elements. It is scalable to large datasets and can utilize GPUs for efficient processing, which aligns with the dataset properties. Furthermore, its capability to accommodate high memory demands is crucial given the dataset's high dimensionality and the additional requirement of high memory. While it has weaknesses with small data sizes and CPU usage, these are not issues here, making it the most suitable choice from the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model as it aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and tabular data, which match the dataset properties. Additionally, AutoEncoder has the ability to work with large datasets and high memory requirements, both of which are crucial given the dataset's size and constraints. Despite requiring a GPU for optimal performance, its short training time and scalability make it appropriate for the dataset's needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is suitable for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. It supports tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, matching the dataset's size and need for high memory support. Additionally, it handles noisy and sparse data well, which are common challenges in high-dimensional datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is a large-scale tabular dataset with high dimensionality and high memory requirements, which aligns well with the strengths of the AutoEncoder model. AutoEncoders are well-suited for dealing with high-dimensional and tabular data, can handle noisy data, and are scalable to large datasets. Additionally, AutoEncoders have high memory capabilities and short training times, meeting the requirements specified in the dataset properties. Although AutoEncoders prefer GPU implementation, their high memory compatibility makes them suitable for the provided CPU requirement, considering the alternatives." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is well-suited for high-dimensional, large tabular datasets, as indicated by its strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and scalability to large datasets. It leverages GPU and high memory effectively, which matches the dataset requirement, while having strengths relevant to this domain. Despite a longer training time on CPU, its scalability and handling of noisy and sparse data make it appropriate for the given dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality with high memory requirements. AutoEncoder is well-suited for high-dimensional tabular data and is scalable to large datasets. It also handles noisy data and leverages GPU and high memory efficiently, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite requiring a CPU, its overall strengths make it the most suitable choice given the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the best choice for the given dataset because it excels in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset's properties. It supports high memory requirements and has a short training time, which fits the additional dataset requirements. While it has a weakness of requiring a GPU, this is mitigated by the dataset's high memory requirement, which can complement GPU usage. AE1SVM stands out among other models for meeting these specific needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is the most suitable model as it handles tabular data well, which matches the dataset type. It is also capable of dealing with high dimensionality, a key characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, ALAD is scalable to large datasets, a crucial factor given the data size. Although it is more oriented towards GPU, the high memory aspect aligns well with the dataset's additional requirements. While it does have a weakness in terms of CPU, its strengths make it the best fit for the given dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable for large tabular data with high dimensionality and requires high memory, which matches the dataset characteristics. Its strengths include handling noisy data and scalability to large datasets, which is important given the dataset's size and complexity. It also offers short training time, which is beneficial given the high dimensionality. Despite the weakness of requiring a GPU, it remains the most compatible option among the listed models considering the dataset's demand for CPU and high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the best choice for this dataset because it handles tabular data and high dimensionality effectively, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, AutoEncoder supports large datasets, has high memory requirements, and can be efficiently trained on a GPU, matching the dataset's needs for a model that can manage large data sizes with high memory. Its weaknesses, such as the need for a GPU instead of CPU, align well with the additional requirements specified in the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "The AE1SVM model is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling high dimensionality and its applicability to tabular data. It is also scalable to large datasets and operates effectively with high memory, which aligns perfectly with the dataset's tags. Although it requires a GPU, it avoids the weaknesses associated with CPU dependency observed in other models. Furthermore, its ability to perform well on high-dimensional tabular data makes it a strong contender in this scenario, despite not being explicitly tuned for noisy data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data with high dimensionality, aligns well with the large data size, and is scalable to large datasets. It also has a strength in handling high memory requirements, which fits the dataset's additional requirements. Despite its CPU weakness, its strengths outweigh other models with regards to the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is a suitable choice for this dataset because it handles high dimensionality effectively and works well with tabular data. It also supports large datasets and high memory, aligning with the dataset properties. It offers scalability and short training time, which are important given the large data size and computational resources available. While it requires a GPU and does not perform well with CPU, the dataset specifies high memory, which aligns with the strengths of AutoEncoder." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is selected because it specifically excels in dealing with tabular data with high dimensionality, which matches well with the dataset's characteristics. It also supports large datasets, aligns with the high memory requirement, and is scalable. While it requires GPU for optimal performance and has a long training time, it is well-suited for the dataset's large size and complexity, leveraging its strengths such as handling noisy and sparse data effectively in a tabular domain." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is chosen because it effectively handles tabular data and high dimensionality, which are key characteristics of the dataset. It supports large datasets and requires high memory, aligning well with the dataset's CPU and high memory requirements. While AE1SVM is optimized for GPU, it still possesses the necessary strengths for handling tabular data with high dimensionality, ensuring scalability to large datasets while maintaining short training time." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable model because it handles high dimensional tabular data effectively, offers high memory utilization, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics provided. Although AE1SVM has a weakness of long training times with CPU, it supports GPU, which can mitigate this issue. Its strength in handling both tabular data and high dimensionality makes it a better fit compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is a fitting choice for the dataset due to its strengths in handling large, high-dimensional tabular data. It is scalable to large datasets, supports GPU acceleration for high-memory environments, and typically involves a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's CPU and high-memory requirements. While it has weaknesses with real-time data and imbalanced datasets, these are not specified concerns for this scenario, making it a suitable choice given the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and has high dimensionality, which aligns well with the strengths of AutoEncoder. AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data and high-dimensional datasets, supports noisy data, and scales well to large datasets, which matches the dataset requirements. Despite needing a GPU for optimal performance, its capability with high memory and short training time accommodate the dataset's additional needs. Its weaknesses related to CPU dependency and imbalanced data are not major concerns given the current dataset description." + }, + { + "selected_model": "ALAD", + "reason": "ALAD is well-suited for the dataset given its effective handling of tabular data and high dimensionality, which matches the specified dataset characteristics. It is capable of working with large datasets, and although it is not optimized for CPU, its strength in GPU environments and ability to handle high memory requirements align with the dataset's additional needs. Despite the longer training time, ALAD offers scalability to large datasets, making it a good fit overall." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is the most suitable choice because it handles high dimensionality and tabular data, which matches the dataset properties. It supports large datasets and performs well with high memory constraints, which is important given the dataset size and additional CPU requirement. Additionally, AE1SVM has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset's needs. While AE1SVM's GPU preference is a slight mismatch with the CPU tag, its overall strengths far outweigh this single discrepancy compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected because it is suited for high-dimensional tabular data, can handle noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics provided. Additionally, AutoEncoder is compatible with high memory requirements and offers short training time, making it a good match even when CPU resources are specified. Despite the CPU weakness, the suitability for tabular data and high dimensionality makes it the best choice given the dataset properties." + } + ], + "satellite": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable because it supports tabular data, aligns with the medium-sized dataset, and operates efficiently with noisy data, which is pertinent given the low-signal data characteristic. It also offers short training time, which can satisfy the low memory requirement to some extent, compared to other models that have memory constraints. Additionally, while VAE's weaknesses include handling discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these aspects are not specified as issues in the dataset tags. Thus, VAE is the best match from the given options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular datasets and supports low memory applications, aligning with the dataset's properties. While it doesn't specialize in low-signal data, its strengths in handling high dimensionality and short training time make it a balanced choice given the constraints and requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it supports tabular data and can handle low-signal data effectively while requiring minimal memory usage, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. It also supports medium-sized datasets with high dimensionality and operates with a short training time. Additionally, VAE is known for its scalability to medium datasets, making it suitable for the task at hand." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for tabular data and operates efficiently on medium-sized datasets, which aligns with the dataset's properties. Despite having a higher memory requirement, VAE supports short training times, manages high-dimensional data, and is suitable for low-signal data since the dataset does not emphasize the need for strong signal extraction. It also offers scalability for larger datasets if needed in the future." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model has strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It is suitable for medium-sized data and has a short training time, which complements the dataset's low memory requirement. Although it has some weaknesses with imbalanced data and low-signal data, its overall compatibility with tabular data and efficiency in processing makes it the most suitable choice among the available models given the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable choice because it is capable of handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's type. Additionally, it is equipped to deal with low-memory environments by offering short training times and is effective with medium-sized datasets, which fits the dataset's size. Although VAE has some weaknesses with imbalanced data, the dataset's primary characteristics align well with VAE's strengths, making it the best fit among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data with high dimensionality and short training times. Despite its higher memory usage, it aligns well with the medium data size requirement and handles tabular data effectively. Although it does not excel with low-signal data, it is the most suitable given the model list constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also designed for low-dimensional datasets, aligning with the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset. Importantly, LUNAR has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it more memory-efficient compared to others. Despite its weakness of being computationally intensive, it poses fewer memory constraints, which is a critical requirement for this data task." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable option for the given dataset because it supports tabular data and has a short training time, which matches the dataset requirement for handling low memory footprints efficiently. Despite the low-signal data tag, VAE's compatibility with tabular data and its strength in efficiently handling medium-sized datasets makes it a viable candidate, especially when low memory usage is necessary. Moreover, VAE can handle noisy data, which is common in low-signal datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low memory requirements and low-signal characteristics. LUNAR is highlighted for its suitability for tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, short training times, and its ability to scale to large datasets. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data and high memory usage, it does not have specific weaknesses related to low memory or low-signal data, making it a better choice compared to other models with significant weaknesses in these areas." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also suitable for medium data sizes as it is scalable to large datasets with a short training time. Despite its need for high memory, it can handle the low-signal characteristic of the dataset more effectively than other models, which either do not support tabular data or have specific weaknesses such as handling low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice due to its strengths in handling tabular data, short training time, and scalability to large datasets, which align well with the dataset properties. Despite its potential issues with noisy data and high memory, LUNAR's key advantages such as efficient processing of low-signal data outweigh these concerns, especially given the low memory requirement and the medium dataset size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low signal and requires low memory usage. AutoEncoder supports tabular data and offers short training time, which is beneficial for medium-sized datasets. Moreover, AutoEncoder's ability to handle tabular data and its support for noisy data aligns well with the dataset characteristics. While it does not explicitly list low memory as a strength, it is more aligned with the dataset properties than other models. Despite its weakness in handling low-signal data, it handles medium-sized datasets better than other models that require high memory or longer training times." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected as it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Additionally, it is effective with short training time requirements and can handle medium-sized datasets, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. While VAE has high memory usage as a weakness, the model's strength in handling tabular data and dealing with potentially noisy data makes it the best fit compared to other models. Models like AE1SVM and AutoEncoder have issues with small data size and require high memory or have weaknesses in low-signal data, making VAE a balanced choice given the dataset requirements and characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular datasets with low memory constraints. Its strengths align with the dataset properties, particularly its ability to handle tabular data effectively while maintaining a short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is ideal for medium-sized data. While it has a weakness with discrete or categorical data, this is not a specified concern for the dataset provided. Overall, VAE's advantages outweigh its weaknesses in this context, making it a suitable match for the given requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it works well with medium-sized tabular data, which is a key characteristic of the dataset in question. Although it is not specifically designed for low-signal data, it has strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensional datasets while maintaining efficiency with a short training time and scalability. While the dataset requires low memory usage, which is a weakness for AutoEncoders, the absence of model options that meet all criteria makes this the most suitable choice given the strengths aligned with the dataset's structure and the additional qualities that could counterbalance the low-signal challenges." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular data and does not have low memory as a weakness, making it a good option given the requirement for low memory usage and the low-signal nature of the data. Although VAE has a weakness with discrete or categorical data, this is not the main concern given the dataset characteristics. Other models either have weaknesses directly related to tabular data or low memory, which are more crucial given the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a suitable choice for the dataset characterized by medium-sized tabular data with low signal, while also needing to be efficient in low memory environments. VAE's strengths include handling tabular data effectively and working efficiently with noisy data, all of which align well with the dataset's requirements. Despite its weakness in low-signal data, it comparatively fits the given requirements better than other models in terms of balancing scalability and resource efficiency." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is chosen because it supports tabular data and can handle medium-sized datasets effectively. While it does have high memory requirements, it also offers a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it suitable given the low memory constraint. VAE's weakness in dealing with discrete or categorical data is not directly in conflict with the dataset properties, and its strengths in managing tabular and noisy data make it a well-rounded choice for low-signal, medium-sized data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Despite being a medium-sized dataset, VAE can manage the dataset effectively given its scalability to large datasets and short training time. While low-signal data is a characteristic in the dataset, the model's ability to handle high dimensionality and noisy data provides potential value extraction. Although VAE has higher memory usage as a weakness, its strengths in handling tabular data and scalability make it the most fitting choice among the given models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it handles tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset type. It is suitable for medium-sized datasets and is optimized for using a GPU, which can help with the constraints of low memory. While it has a weakness in handling discrete or categorical data, the dataset characteristics of 'low-signal data' could still benefit from its ability to work with high-dimensional data and noisy data. Other models either have substantial weaknesses in dealing with tabular data or exhibit not being optimized for short training time or efficient memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is best suited for the given dataset as it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Despite having high memory requirements, it handles medium-sized datasets effectively with a short training time. It also possesses strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data, although the dataset is characterized by low signal, which isn't directly a strong point of VAE, other models in the list are less suitable due to more significant mismatches with the dataset characteristics, such as not supporting tabular data or requiring high memory without other matching strengths." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for the dataset properties, as it handles tabular data effectively. It provides strengths in high dimensionality and performs well on medium-sized datasets. Additionally, it offers short training times and operates well with GPU, aligning closely with the dataset requirements. Although it requires high memory, which is a slight mismatch, it compensates with its applicability to tabular data and medium dataset size, making it a better fit compared to other models with significant weaknesses regarding tabular data or low-memory concerns." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable as it supports tabular data, which aligns well with the dataset type. Additionally, the VAE model has a strength in dealing with high dimensionality, short training time, and scalability to large datasets. Although VAE might suffer with discrete or categorical data, it is designed to handle noisy data, which can be beneficial for low-signal data where the signal is difficult to discern. Other models have critical weaknesses such as high memory (DevNet) or low-signal data incompatibility (ALAD), making VAE a better fit given the medium-sized dataset and the low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is the best choice for this dataset because it has strengths in handling tabular data along with high dimensionality, which is suitable for the given dataset properties. It also supports GPU, has a short training time, and is scalable to large datasets, which is beneficial given the medium data size and low memory requirement. Although it does not specialize in low-signal data, its advantages in other relevant aspects make it the most suitable model among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and can handle low-dimensional, unstructured feature datasets, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It is also able to manage imbalanced and sparse data, and offers the benefit of short training times and scalability to large datasets. Although it may be computationally intensive, it does not have a specific weakness for low memory, making it feasible given the dataset's requirements for low signal data and low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for medium-sized tabular data with low signal and low memory requirements. It has strengths in handling tabular data, operates efficiently on GPU for high-dimensional datasets, and maintains a short training time, which counters the low-signal characteristic. While it has weaknesses with categorical data and imbalanced data, these are not primary concerns given the dataset properties. Compared to other models, VAE best fits the dataset's needs without major drawbacks based on the given characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is suitable for medium-sized tabular data and works well with low memory constraints, given its short training time and scalability. It is specifically strong with tabular data, high dimensionality, and supports GPU acceleration, which fits the characteristics of the dataset. Although AutoEncoder has a weakness for low-signal data, its strengths align well with the dataset properties, making it the best choice among the listed models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for medium-sized tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It is efficient in handling tabular data, which is explicitly indicated as a strength. Despite requiring high memory, which contrasts with the dataset's low memory constraint, VAE has a short training time and can accommodate low-signal data better than other models, as its weaknesses do not explicitly list low-signal data as a limitation. This makes VAE the best fit among the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is tabular with a medium data size and low-signal characteristics, requiring low memory usage. VAE is strong with tabular data and capable of handling high dimensionality and noisy data, although it generally requires high memory. However, other model options either have significant weaknesses with tabular or low-signal data, or do not meet the low memory requirement, making VAE a better fit compared to the alternatives even with this trade-off on memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is characterized by medium-sized tabular data with low-signal and low memory requirements. Among the models, VAE supports tabular data well, offers short training times, and can handle medium-sized datasets. Additionally, it doesn't have significant memory constraints. While VAE may not excel in low-signal scenarios, its ability to work with tabular data and medium-sized datasets makes it the best option among the given models, as others have more debilitating weaknesses for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model based on the dataset properties. The dataset is tabular with medium size and low memory requirements. Although the dataset is characterized by low signal data, LUNAR's strength in handling tabular data and its capability to work with sparse data and short training time make it a good fit. While it is sensitive to hyperparameters and can be computationally intensive, it does not have issues with low memory and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the provided requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data and is efficient with medium-sized datasets, a short training time, and can handle noisy data. While it is less suitable for low-signal data, it meets other dataset constraints such as tabular format and medium size better than the alternatives, thus offering a balanced choice in line with the given data characteristics and additional requirement of low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, fits within the constraints of medium-sized datasets with low memory usage, and does not have weaknesses directly impeding its performance on low-signal datasets. VAE's short training time and ability to handle high dimensionality make it a robust choice. Other models like DevNet and AutoEncoder, despite handling tabular and low memory well, have weaknesses such as low-signal data in the case of AutoEncoder, making VAE more optimal under the given constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it is designed to handle tabular data effectively. It also offers a short training time, which is beneficial given the medium data size. Although it requires high memory, which contradicts the low memory requirement, it is the least conflicting option available since it performs well on tabular data and can manage low-signal data to some degree. Other models either have a strong weakness against low-signal data or tabular data, making VAE the best compromise given the circumstances." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data and allows for high dimensionality, which fits well with the dataset's tags. It handles noisy data efficiently, has a short training time, and can work with low-memory resources. Although it has a weakness with discrete or categorical data, that is the least impact compared to the low-signal nature of the dataset which VAE does not explicitly address. Given the requirement for low memory and preference for models on tabular data, VAE's strengths align closely with the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. It also provides scalability to large datasets and has short training times, fitting the requirement for a medium-sized dataset with low memory constraints. Additionally, LUNAR excels with imbalanced and sparse data, which might be beneficial given the dataset's low-signal characteristics. While it is computationally intensive and sensitive to hyperparameters, its strengths outweigh these factors for the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is a suitable choice for this medium-sized tabular dataset with low-signal characteristics. It can handle tabular data effectively and has a short training time, which is beneficial for datasets with low memory requirements. Although AutoEncoders have a weakness with low-signal data, the other models have more severe compatibility issues with either tabular data, low signal, or memory constraints. AutoEncoder's strengths in tabular data processing and scalability make it the most balanced option here, despite its weakness in low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "Considering the dataset properties of medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics and the additional requirement for low memory usage, VAE is the most suitable choice. VAE is strong in handling tabular data and works efficiently with high dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's low-signal data characteristic. Despite the low memory requirements, VAE generally has a short training time which can help mitigate the memory concerns. Although it is not explicitly listed as low memory, its efficiency in training can be advantageous compared to other models that are explicitly high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is characterized as 'medium' in size and 'tabular', with a need for 'low memory'. While the dataset is 'low-signal', the primary requirement is a model that supports tabular data efficiently with low memory usage. VAE has strengths in handling tabular data and works well with medium-sized datasets. Although it typically requires high memory, it can handle the low-signal characteristics of the dataset better than other options. The other models either are not suited for tabular data, have memory constraints, or do not handle low-signal data well." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular in type, and characterized by low-signal data, with an additional requirement of low memory. Among the models listed, VAE supports tabular data and is efficient for medium-sized datasets. Although it may not inherently cater to low-signal data, VAE handles tabular data well and has a short training time. While it requires high memory, it meets more of the dataset's criteria than the other models, which either don't support tabular data as strongly or have weaknesses that do not align well with the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's type. It has a short training time, making it suitable for medium-sized datasets, and it can handle datasets with high dimensionality, which might be relevant given the 'low-signal data' characteristic. Additionally, VAE is listed to be effective with low memory requirements, aligning well with the dataset's additional requirement of 'low memory'. It is more suitable compared to other models, as none of the weaknesses directly impact the dataset's provided characteristics. The only potential concern is its ineffectiveness with imbalanced data, but this is outweighed by its other strengths." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics, and there is an additional requirement for low memory usage. Among the options provided, VAE supports tabular data processing and is efficient with medium-sized datasets due to short training times and scalability to large datasets. Despite the requirements for high memory, which isn't ideal for low memory constraints, VAE's ability to handle noisy data and tabular data makes it the most suitable among available options given the constraints provided. Other models either have significant weaknesses dealing with tabular data, low-signal constraints, or small datasets, making VAE the best fit although some trade-offs exist." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It explicitly supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type, and it is also designed to handle low-signal data effectively which is critical given the dataset characteristics. Furthermore, LUNAR operates efficiently with low memory and provides short training times, addressing the additional requirements of the dataset. Despite LUNAR's computational intensity and hyperparameter sensitivity, these factors are less critical compared to the match in dataset characteristics and requirements. Other models either have weaknesses directly affecting the dataset's low memory requirement or do not align as well with the given dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset properties indicate a medium-sized tabular dataset with low-signal data and a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is well-suited for tabular data and offers short training times, making it efficient for medium data sizes. While it is not specifically optimized for low memory, it strikes a good balance with its strengths in efficient handling of tabular datasets and compatibility with high-dimensional data. Moreover, it benefits from GPU acceleration, which can offset some memory constraints. Other models either have critical weaknesses with low-signal data (e.g., DevNet, ALAD, AutoEncoder) or do not align well with the specified tabular data type or low memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized and consists of tabular data with low signal, requiring a model that can handle tabular data, is efficient in terms of memory, and offers a short training time. The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, has a short training time, and performs well on medium-sized datasets despite low-signal properties. Although it has high memory requirements, the strengths of handling tabular data and short training durations make it a more suited candidate compared to others on the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. While it has high memory usage as a weakness, it excels in handling tabular data and has short training times, making it a suitable choice for a medium-sized dataset. Although it is not specifically strong in dealing with low-signal data, among the options, it best aligns with the dataset's needs without a strong conflict with its weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset properties. It is optimized for scenarios with sparse and imbalanced data and performs well with low-dimensional datasets, which might be relevant for low-signal data. Moreover, LUNAR is efficient with short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which addresses the medium data size without a high memory footprint, as required. Other models either have weaknesses with low-signal data or require more memory than available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data, which aligns with the dataset properties. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, it supports tabular data effectively with strengths in short training time and high dimensionality. It also has low memory requirements compared to other models, making it a suitable choice for your constraints in low memory and low-signal data handling." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. It has strengths like short training time and compatibility with high-dimensionality datasets, which are useful given the medium data size requirement. Despite having a weakness with discrete or categorical data, VAE's ability to handle noisy data and be scalable to large datasets makes it a suitable choice for low-signal datasets. The requirement for low memory is a concern, but among the available options, VAE has fewer conflicting weaknesses compared to other models." + } + ], + "lympho": [ + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is best suited for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and its low-memory requirement, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also benefits from short training times and is scalable to large datasets, making it efficient despite the dataset being small in size. Although more memory-intensive models like AE1SVM, ALAD, and AutoEncoder are viable for tabular data, LUNAR is better suited for scenarios where low memory usage is critical." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. It is also suitable for small dataset sizes, as there is no explicit weakness listed for small datasets. Moreover, it has low memory requirements, as its high memory is listed as a weakness, and has a short training time, making it a suitable fit given the 'low memory' additional requirement outlined in the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a suitable choice as it supports tabular data, which matches our dataset type. It is efficient with small data sizes due to its short training time and is capable of operating in environments with limited memory. While it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and may not be ideal for highly imbalanced datasets, these do not outweigh its capabilities with tabular data in the provided context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. Despite requiring high memory, it is suitable due to its strengths in handling tabular data and providing short training time, making it efficient for small datasets. While other models have weaknesses such as poor performance on small datasets or lack of support for tabular data, VAE balances its capabilities well given the constraints, making it the most suitable choice among the options provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is capable of handling tabular data effectively, which is the type of dataset we have. Although it generally requires high memory, it has a short training time, which is beneficial for a small dataset. While it does have weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these weaknesses were less relevant compared to other models in the list, especially since the dataset size is small and there's a need for low memory usage. Furthermore, VAE's compatibility with high dimensionality and noisy data aligns well with potential data characteristics that are often encountered in various domains." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is suitable because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, and while this is a small dataset, the low memory requirement fits, as LUNAR doesn't have specific weaknesses related to small data size or low memory environments. Its weaknesses like high memory and hyperparameter sensitivity aren't critical in this scenario, as the dataset is small." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is small, tabular, and requires low memory usage. While VAE does have some high memory requirements, among the field, it is one of the few models with strong support for tabular data which is critical for this task. Additionally, it excels in handling high dimensional data and noisy data, should these characteristics become relevant. Also, VAE provides a short training time which is suitable given the small data size. Other models in the list either struggle with small datasets or tabular data, making VAE the balanced choice despite its limitation on memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is best suited for tabular data and is characterized by its ability to handle low-dimensional datasets. While it may require careful tuning due to hyperparameter sensitivity, it offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Notably, it does not have small data size as a weakness, making it a suitable choice for a small dataset with low memory requirements. This contrasts with most other models which list small data size or low memory as weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular data and small datasets, which fits the dataset properties identified. While it has some weaknesses with high memory, it offers low memory requirements compared to other models in the list due to its design for low-dimensional datasets, and provides short training times, making it an optimal choice given the additional requirement for low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, and its ability to work well with sparse and imbalanced data. Additionally, it is designed for low memory usage and has a short training time, which aligns well with the dataset\u2019s characteristics of being small and having low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it specifically lists 'tabular data' as a strength, which aligns with the dataset's data type. Despite requiring high memory, other options are either explicitly weak for small datasets or tabular data, or do not emphasize the needed strengths. VAE also has a short training time, which is advantageous for a small dataset requiring low memory usage, balancing more favorable characteristics applicable to the dataset needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "Based on the dataset properties of small size, tabular data, and additional requirement of low memory, LUNAR is a suitable choice because it supports tabular data, performs well with low-dimensional datasets, and has short training times. While it is marked as potentially high memory, its lack of reliance on other characteristics not present in the data (e.g., images, time series) makes it a more suitable choice compared to models like AutoEncoder, which would be constrained by small data size limitations." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data and has short training time, which aligns with the dataset requirement of low memory usage. Although it's typically suitable for larger datasets, none of the weaknesses directly conflict with the dataset properties. Other models are less suitable due to specific weaknesses associated with small data size and low memory, which are not applicable to VAE in this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is capable of handling low-dimensional and sparse datasets and offers short training times, meeting the requirement for low memory usage. Although LUNAR has some weaknesses like high memory usage and hyperparameter sensitivity, it still aligns better with the dataset characteristics compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it specifically supports tabular data and small data size is not mentioned as a weakness. Additionally, LUNAR has strengths in low-dimensional datasets, short training time, and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset tag of requiring low memory. This makes LUNAR more suitable compared to other options that have small data size or low memory as weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice as it supports tabular data effectively and is optimized for low-dimensional datasets, which fits the 'small' data size requirement. It also operates with low memory usage, meeting the 'low memory' constraint, and has a short training time, making it efficient to deploy. Although it has some weaknesses like high memory demand and hyperparameter sensitivity, these are less impacting than those of the other models given the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is small and tabular, requiring low memory usage. LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, can handle sparse and imbalanced datasets, and promises short training time with scalability to larger datasets. It is not strongly affected by the weaknesses that impact other models concerning small data sizes, making it the most suitable choice given the dataset's needs for low memory consumption and small data adaptability." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is small, tabular, and requires low memory usage. VAE supports tabular data and has a short training time, making it suitable for small data contexts. Although VAE has a weakness with discrete/categorical data, this is offset by its strength in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, thus potentially providing robust performance despite dataset limitations." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice as it supports tabular data with a small dataset size requirement and low memory usage, given its short training time and efficiency in handling sparse data. Even though it requires careful hyperparameter tuning, it meets the data size, type, and additional requirements indicated by the dataset tags better than other models which have weaknesses such as high memory consumption or inadequate performance on small datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is small, consists of tabular data, and has a requirement for low memory usage. While VAE typically requires high memory, it does not have the explicit 'small data size' weakness as many others in the list do, making it a more suitable option. It is also explicitly strong with tabular data, unlike most other models in the list that are either weak with small datasets or require high memory, which does not meet the dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it has strengths in dealing with tabular data and low-dimensional datasets. It is capable of handling sparse and imbalanced data, which aligns with potential characteristics implied by the additional requirement of low memory. Moreover, LUNAR has short training times and is scalable to large datasets, ensuring efficient processing with the constraints of a small data size. Despite weaknesses in regions like images and high memory usage, it aligns closely with the dataset properties compared to other models that are not optimized for small data size and have memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a suitable choice for a small, tabular dataset with low memory requirements. It has the strength of handling tabular data and although it generally requires high memory, its support for GPU and short training time can compensate for the low memory constraint better than other options. The weaknesses of VAE don't significantly impact the small, low-memory, tabular dataset context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice because it handles tabular data well and is suited for high-dimensionality data. Additionally, it supports short training times, which is beneficial for a small dataset. Although it requires high memory, which is a requirement, it delivers good performance for tabular data in small volumes compared to other models with more significant weaknesses related to small data size or low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the best choice for this dataset as it specifically supports 'tabular data' and 'low-dimensional datasets,' which aligns with the dataset properties. Although it requires high memory, the dataset's need for 'low memory' is not as critical because the other models in the list have more significant weaknesses related to small data size and poor performance on tabular data. Furthermore, LUNAR offers a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which ensures quick deployment and extension if the dataset grows." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model supports tabular data, which is suitable for this dataset. While it requires high memory and is scalable to large datasets, the short training time is beneficial for small datasets. Although it is not ideal for discrete or categorical data, it manages other data characteristics well. Despite its strengths in high memory usage, it doesn't have low memory in its weaknesses for small data sizes, making it a viable option given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset because it supports tabular data, which is the type of data we have. It can handle a small data size, as our dataset is described to be small, and it operates well under low memory settings despite its need for high memory typically. Additionally, it has short training times which is beneficial for efficiency. While it may not inherently solve the low memory constraint, among the options available, it offers the best alignment with the dataset's characteristics and additional requirements compared to other models on the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and performs efficiently with low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the 'small' dataset size tag. It also excels in dealing with sparse and imbalanced data, features that are often encountered in tabular data. Furthermore, LUNAR is optimized for low memory usage and offers a short training time, which matches the dataset's requirement for low memory usage. These characteristics make LUNAR the most appropriate choice from the given model list for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and its compatibility with low-dimensional datasets. It also supports sparse and imbalanced data, which can be advantageous. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Although the dataset size is classified as small and has low memory requirements, LUNAR's specifications align better with the need for low memory compared to other models in the list, making it the best choice among the given options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset as it specifically targets tabular data, aligns well with the small data size, offers short training time, and can operate under low memory conditions. Additionally, it is designed to work efficiently with low-dimensional datasets, making it well-suited for the defined requirements and constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is specifically strong in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Despite the requirement of low memory, LUNAR's weaknesses do not explicitly include low memory as a limitation, unlike many other models that struggle with small datasets or require high memory. Additionally, LUNAR supports low-dimensional datasets and offers a short training time, making it a better fit compared to others on the list for this small dataset scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and works well on low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset's property of being small and requiring low memory. It offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it efficient even for smaller datasets. Additionally, LUNAR has strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data, which could potentially be beneficial despite these characteristics not being explicitly listed in the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular datasets, which aligns with our dataset type. It can handle small data sizes within its capabilities, offers low memory usage, and features short training times, making it ideal for scenarios that require efficient processing within limited resources. While other models might excel in high-dimensional data or large datasets, LUNAR meets the specific requirements of our small, tabular dataset needing low memory consumption, without any critical weaknesses impacting this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a suitable choice for dealing with tabular data, which is the data type present in the dataset. It handles high dimensionality and noisy data well while offering short training times. Despite its higher memory requirement being non-ideal for low memory scenarios, it is the only model from the list with strengths that align closely with the dataset type (tabular data), making it the best option available from the given list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties since it has strengths in handling tabular data and is designed for low memory usage with short training times, which aligns well with the dataset's requirements of 'small' data size and 'low memory'. Even though it requires GPU and is sensitive to hyperparameters, its strengths with tabular data and handling sparse and imbalanced data make it a good fit for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Despite its weaknesses in handling small data sizes, it has strengths in using low memory, which is a requirement in this case, and can accommodate data of varying sizes efficiently. Additionally, its short training time aligns well with optimizing computational resources for small datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also has strengths in high dimensionality and short training time, and it can manage tabular data well, which is a requirement in the dataset tags. Even though VAE requires high memory, it does not have specific weaknesses around small data sizes like some other models in the list. Therefore, given the need to handle tabular data with low memory requirements in a small dataset, VAE is a reasonable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for the given requirements. It supports tabular data (a key dataset property) and can operate efficiently on small datasets, albeit with careful tuning. While VAE typically needs high memory, its adaptability to tabular data outweighs weaknesses in memory usage. Despite some challenges with discrete or categorical data, it can be fine-tuned more effectively than other models, which have fundamental weaknesses with small dataset sizes or tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is small in size and is tabular, with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is the most suitable choice as it is designed for tabular data and supports a short training time, which is beneficial given the dataset's small size. Despite not being low memory, VAE is better aligned with our needs compared to other options that have more pronounced weaknesses with small data and tabular data. Furthermore, VAE supports noisy data, which might be beneficial depending on the dataset characteristics not explicitly mentioned. Although VAE's weaknesses include handling discrete or categorical data poorly, it is still a better match compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for a small, tabular dataset with low memory requirements. It is tailored for low-dimensional and tabular data, and is also efficient for datasets that may be sparse or imbalanced. While it requires a GPU for optimal performance, it addresses low memory requirements by being scalable and having short training times, making it an appropriate choice for a small dataset. Other models in the list struggle with small data size or require high memory, which the dataset's additional requirement does not permit." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles noisy data efficiently and offers short training time, aligning with low memory requirements. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, its strengths match better than other models given the constraints of small data size and low memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset as it handles tabular data well, which matches the dataset type. It is also capable of working with small data sizes, which suits the 'small' label of the dataset. Additionally, it has low memory requirements, aligning well with the additional dataset requirement of 'low memory'. Although it's computationally intensive, it provides scalable short training times that are appropriate for efficient processing within low-dimensional datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data and supports high dimensionality, which aligns with the 'tabular data' tag of the dataset. Although the dataset size is small and VAE does not specifically address low memory, it offers short training times compared to other models. Additionally, it is well-suited for handling noisy data, which might be a relevant consideration even if not explicitly tagged. Other models either have significant weaknesses with small datasets or are not recommended for tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and small datasets, and it is optimized for low-dimensional datasets with short training time, which aligns well with the requirement for low memory usage. Despite having some weaknesses such as being computationally intensive, it does not have 'small data size' as a weakness and addresses the major consideration of low memory and quick adaptability to tabular datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is specifically designed for tabular data, which matches the data type requirement. Although the dataset is small, which is generally a weakness of LUNAR, the dataset does not require high memory or computationally intensive models, which aligns well with LUNAR's strengths. LUNAR's ability to handle imbalanced and sparse data effectively without consuming significant memory makes it an ideal choice given the requirement for low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset requires a model suitable for small, tabular data with low memory requirements. VAE has strengths in handling tabular data and is known for short training times, which is crucial for low memory usage. Despite its high memory requirement, it still fits better compared to others, which have weaknesses in small data size or tabular data. VAE's short training time can be leveraged to manage memory more efficiently." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties and requirements. It is specifically designed for tabular data and performs well on low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags. Additionally, LUNAR is resource-efficient with short training times, making it a good fit for the low memory requirement. While it can handle imbalanced and sparse data, it does not require high memory, aligning perfectly with the dataset constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it is suitable for tabular data and small datasets, which aligns with the dataset's properties of being small and tabular. Additionally, LUNAR is capable of handling sparse data and provides short training time, which is beneficial for low memory requirements. Its weaknesses are not particularly detrimental to the dataset's characteristics, given the absence of noisy data and the focus on low-dimensional datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model as it explicitly handles tabular data, which is a requirement given the dataset type. It performs well on low-dimensional datasets, which is often a characteristic of small datasets. Additionally, LUNAR has short training times and is scalable to large datasets, which indirectly suggests efficiency with small datasets and aligns with the low memory requirement. While it is computationally intensive, it does not have a direct 'low memory' weakness like many other models on the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "Given the dataset's properties\u2014being small and tabular with a low memory requirement\u2014LUNAR is the most suitable model from the list. It is specifically equipped to handle tabular data and small datasets efficiently, particularly in low-memory environments. Its strengths align well with the dataset's needs, despite potential hyperparameter sensitivity, which can be managed with careful tuning." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is small and consists of tabular data with a requirement for low memory usage. Among the models that are suitable for tabular data, VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is one of the few that specifically list tabular data as one of its strengths. Despite some weaknesses with small data sizes, it has relatively fewer negative implications for the current dataset when compared to other models, and does not have a specific weakness for low memory usage, making it a better fit compared to other options." + } + ], + "ionosphere": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is a suitable choice because it is strong with tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the medium data size. Although it requires high memory, it effectively handles high dimensionality and noisy data, adding robustness to the model, which are important considerations for the dataset characteristics. The main weaknesses of VAE, such as dealing with discrete or categorical data, are not a major concern given the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and can handle balanced datasets effectively. It supports high dimensionality, which aligns with the medium-sized dataset. Additionally, it has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Although it requires high memory, it still fits better than other options considering the dataset requirements, as it doesn't have low memory explicitly listed as a requirement but might be preferred if available. Overall, it matches the dataset's characteristics and fulfills most requirements more closely than other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is suitable because it supports medium-sized tabular data, which matches the dataset properties given. It provides good performance on high-dimensionality data, which might be a characteristic of the dataset, and offers a scalable solution with short training time and effectiveness on noisy data. Although it has high memory requirements in practice, the model's strengths align closely with the dataset characteristics, such as balanced data and tabular format, more so than other models available in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it specifically includes tabular data in its strengths and can handle medium-sized datasets. It also offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets. While VAE has high memory requirements, it is the best fit given the emphasis on tabular data and memory efficiency among the options, and the weak factors like imbalanced data and discrete data are not concerns for this balanced and initially described dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and balanced with a low memory requirement. AutoEncoder is suitable for tabular data and medium datasets, has strengths in short training time, and is scalable to larger datasets. Although it has a high memory usage, among the model options provided, it aligns best with the dataset characteristics by supporting tabular data and handling noisy data, thus making it a suitable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling tabular, low-dimensional datasets, and imbalanced data with short training time and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the provided dataset properties. Though it has high memory usage as a weakness, its compatibility with balanced tabular data and its efficiency make it a better fit compared to other models that have low memory strength but might struggle with other dataset characteristics such as tabular data or scalability issues." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and balanced. The AutoEncoder model is suitable for tabular data and is known for handling high dimensionality effectively with short training times. Although it requires high memory, which contrasts with the low memory requirement in dataset tags, it doesn't have significant weaknesses for this data size and type. AutoEncoder provides scalability to large datasets, aligning well with the medium data size without significant performance issues, making it a viable choice in this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles medium-sized datasets effectively and is capable of processing high-dimensional data efficiently with the aid of a GPU. Despite having high memory requirements as a weakness, other models have more critical incompatibilities with the dataset, such as weaknesses in handling tabular data or constraints on memory usage. VAE's short training time is beneficial, fitting the low memory requirement indirectly by minimizing resource utilization time." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice as it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also capable of handling medium-sized, balanced datasets effectively with low memory requirements due to its short training time, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its high memory tag, the VAE's short training time suggests efficient use of resources. Other models presented weaknesses related to small data size, low memory handling, or were not optimized for tabular data usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, is effective for medium-sized datasets, and aligns well with low memory requirements due to its short training time. Unlike other models listed, it addresses the dataset's characteristics better by handling tabular data and providing scalability to large datasets, despite weak support for imbalanced data. Importantly, VAE's capability to function with low memory and its suitability for the dataset type outweigh its weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for the dataset properties as it supports tabular data, which is the type of data in this case. It handles medium-sized datasets effectively and has a short training time. The model is scalable to large datasets, which caters to potentially varying data sizes, and although it requires high memory, it does not specifically struggle with low memory requirements in the context of medium data sizes where other models may have constraints. The dataset is also balanced, which aligns with VAE's capability to handle data effectively, making it a more optimal choice compared to others with greater weaknesses in tabular or balanced data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for medium-sized balanced tabular datasets, which matches the given dataset properties. It handles tabular data effectively, offers short training times, and is scalable to large datasets. Additionally, LUNAR is likely to meet the low memory requirement better than other models that specifically mention high memory as a weakness. Its capability to deal with imbalanced data also aligns well with balanced datasets, ensuring robustness to minor class imbalances that might not be evident. Despite being indicated as computationally intensive, it doesn't mention high memory as a primary need, which makes it a compatible choice for the low memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and balanced, with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is a strong candidate because it is suitable for tabular data and has short training times. Although it typically requires high memory, it does not have a specific low memory weakness, unlike MO-GAAL and AE1SVM which are explicitly marked as unsuitable for low memory conditions. Furthermore, VAE's weakness in handling imbalanced data is mitigated as the dataset is balanced, making it the most suitable choice from the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, which is the type of data in the dataset. It can handle medium-sized datasets and operates efficiently with GPU, which is suitable for models requiring short training times. Furthermore, AutoEncoder's strengths include handling high-dimensional and noisy data, and it is designed to have a short training time with scalable capabilities, aligning well with the dataset's characteristics and additional requirements for low memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized, balanced tabular datasets. It specifically lists tabular data as one of its strengths and handles high dimensionality efficiently, which is a common trait in tabular datasets. VAE can operate with a low memory footprint compared to other models, which aligns with the dataset's low memory requirement. Although it uses high memory in some configurations, it offers short training times, making it a practical choice for medium datasets where memory management is a consideration." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, balanced, and requires a model with low memory usage. VAE has strengths in handling tabular data, includes support for medium to large datasets, and has short training time. While it typically requires high memory, it matches well with the majority of the dataset properties and lacks the low memory issue seen in models like AnoGAN, MO-GAAL, and AE1SVM. The models like AE1SVM and ALAD, despite being strong with tabular data, have low memory weaknesses. VAE is thus the most suitable available option considering the given criteria." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is best suited for the given dataset characteristics. It handles 'tabular data' effectively, which matches the dataset type. It also works well with 'medium-sized' data and has 'short training time,' suitable for the 'balanced data' characteristic. Despite its requirement for 'high memory,' it is one of the few models that do not list 'low memory' as a weakness, and it provides good performance on 'tabular data' with 'balanced' datasets compared to others which have more weaknesses aligning with the dataset constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data, handles medium data sizes efficiently, and works well with high dimensional data. While it requires more memory, its high performance on tabular data and relatively short training time make it the best fit for the balanced dataset with low memory requirements considering the strengths and weaknesses of the other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is chosen because it supports tabular data and high dimensionality, which matches the dataset properties. It is also suitable for medium-sized datasets and offers a short training time with scalability to large datasets. Despite its high memory requirement, it aligns well with the balanced data characteristics and low memory demand compared to other models like AE1SVM, which also has low memory as a weakness. Additionally, AutoEncoder's strengths, such as GPU support and handling noisy data, further align with the dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized, balanced tabular data while having low memory requirements as a relative strength compared to other options. It supports tabular data well, provides short training time, and has scalability to large datasets. This aligns with the dataset's requirement of low memory usage and could manage well with tabular data, offering balance between strengths and weaknesses given the available model choices." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable because it supports tabular data and works well with medium-sized datasets. It offers strengths in scenarios requiring high dimensionality handling, which aligns well with the 'balanced data' characteristic of the dataset. Although it requires high memory, it provides short training time compared to some other models and effectively utilizes GPUs, making it a viable choice given the 'low memory' requirement when balanced against other considerations. While it does have weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, the dataset does not explicitly state these traits, making VAE a strong fit overall." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is most suitable for this dataset since it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. VAE is also efficient with medium-sized datasets and has a short training time, fitting the requirement for low memory consumption. While VAE may have weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, these do not conflict significantly with the dataset's characteristics, which include balanced data. Additionally, VAE's ability to handle high dimensionality and its scalability to large datasets make it an ideal choice, addressing the requirements for a robust model with moderate memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, balanced, and consists of tabular data, which aligns well with the strengths of VAE. VAE handles tabular data effectively, supports high-dimensional data, and offers short training times. While it requires high memory, the dataset's low memory requirement is relatively less critical given the other options have more significant mismatches in the weaknesses department. Furthermore, unlike other models, VAE does not have severe weaknesses concerning small data size or low memory that would disqualify it in this context. Therefore, VAE is a suitable choice given the dataset properties and other model alternatives." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized tabular datasets and operates efficiently with balanced data. It supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and has a short training time, meeting the low memory requirement. Although it uses high memory during operation, it is scalable to larger datasets, making it a suitable choice for the given dataset properties. Other models either have stronger weaknesses in handling tabular data or present issues with low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is a suitable choice for the given dataset properties because it supports tabular data and features such as high dimensionality and noisy data, which align well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite having high memory requirements, which is a weakness for datasets with low memory constraints, VAE's strengths include handling tabular data efficiently with a short training time and scalability to large datasets, making it a better fit compared to other models with more critical weaknesses related to the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is highly suitable for the given dataset characteristics since it excels with medium-sized tabular data and is capable of handling high dimensionality and noisy data. It also benefits from low memory requirements, which aligns with the 'low memory' constraint of the dataset. Additionally, it supports short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it a robust choice for the current dataset needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, and balanced with a requirement for low memory usage. AutoEncoder is strong in handling medium to large datasets, especially for tabular data. It operates well with high dimensionality and offers short training time, making it apt for balanced tabular data applications. Though it typically requires high memory, its strengths with tabular data and high-dimensionality datasets make it the most suitable choice from the given list, despite facing some constraints in low-memory scenarios. It aligns well with the core dataset characteristics and outperforms others in handling the given conditions effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, tabular, balanced, and requires low memory usage. AutoEncoder has strengths in handling tabular data, is scalable to large datasets, and requires short training time, which aligns well with the medium data size. Although AutoEncoder typically requires high memory, it still fits better than other models in the list, as all models with low memory strengths do not perform as well with tabular data or have other significant restrictions like small data size. Hence, AutoEncoder is the most suitable model given the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a strong fit for the dataset properties as it supports tabular data and is effective for medium-sized, balanced datasets. VAE handles high-dimensional data, which aligns well with the dataset's tabular type. Despite its requirement for high memory, which isn't ideal for low memory constraints, it accommodates high memory and GPU computation, offering short training times, making it suitable for balanced tabular datasets with specific low-memory adjustments." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. While it requires high memory, it is favored because it supports short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is beneficial for a medium-sized dataset. Additionally, its ability to deal with noisy data aligns well with the dataset characteristics. Although VAE has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, the dataset is balanced, mitigating these concerns. Other models with low memory requirements either do not specialize in tabular data or entail limitations that are more detrimental than VAE's weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable due to its compatibility with tabular data and balanced datasets as indicated by the dataset tags. It can handle medium data sizes well and has the ability to manage high dimensionality, which is often present in tabular data. Additionally, VAE exhibits short training times and can scale to large datasets, making it a good fit for this scenario. Although VAE demands high memory, which conflicts with the 'low memory' requirement, its strengths in other necessary aspects such as handling tabular data and scalability make it the most suitable choice from the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is suitable for the given dataset as it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset's type. It also handles medium-sized and balanced data well, as indicated by its scalability to large datasets and short training time. Despite requiring higher memory, its strengths align with the dataset properties better than other models, and it offers low memory usage, making it a suitable fit for the additional requirements of low memory consumption." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is best suited for medium-sized, balanced tabular datasets with low memory requirements. It excels with tabular data and offers high dimensionality capabilities, which is appropriate for the given dataset tags. Additionally, VAE models have short training times and are scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the low memory constraint. While VAE has weaknesses regarding imbalanced data, this is not a concern as the dataset is balanced." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized, balanced, and in tabular form, with a requirement for low memory usage. The AutoEncoder model is suitable for tabular data and is capable of handling balanced datasets. Although it typically requires high memory, it is the most compatible option given the available models, as it provides efficient handling of tabular data with short training times. Additionally, its scalability to large datasets means it can efficiently use resources even with a medium data size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is most suitable for the given dataset properties which include medium-sized, balanced, tabular data with low memory requirements. LUNAR has strengths in handling tabular data and supports low-dimensional and sparse datasets, which aligns with the characteristics of the provided data. Additionally, it offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is advantageous. Although it is high memory-intensive, the short training time and its suitability for tabular data make it the best fit compared to other options in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data and can handle medium-sized datasets effectively. It offers a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it appropriate for balanced data and low memory requirements. Despite its sensitivity to hyperparameters and somewhat high memory usage, its strengths align closely with the dataset characteristics, especially since it addresses the need for efficient use of computational resources." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles medium data sizes and supports high dimensionality, which can be beneficial for diverse tabular datasets. Despite requiring more memory and not being ideal for low memory constraints, its strengths in tabular data and ability to process noisy data over short training times make it a suitable option among available models. VAE's capability to handle medium-sized datasets and scalability to larger datasets align well with the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. The dataset is of medium size and balanced, and LUNAR can handle such datasets efficiently with its short training time and scalability to large datasets. Additionally, it operates well within low-memory environments, making it a good fit given the low memory requirement of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it is well-suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It can handle medium-sized datasets efficiently. Although it requires high memory, its short training time and scalability to large datasets fit the requirement of low memory better than other options. Moreover, VAE handles high dimensionality and noisy data well, making it robust for varied data quality." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized, balanced, tabular data while being sensitive to low memory requirements. VAE's strengths include its compatibility with tabular data, balanced data scenarios, and its efficient memory usage. It also features short training times and scalability, making it apt for managing medium-sized datasets with constraints on memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is selected because it aligns well with the given dataset properties. It is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data, and it handles high dimensionality effectively. Even though it generally requires high memory, its capability to work with tabular data and short training time make it a suitable candidate given the balanced nature of the dataset. Other models either have weaknesses with tabular data or low memory constraints which do not align well with the dataset needs." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is the most suitable model for this medium-sized, balanced tabular dataset with low memory requirements. It has strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, aligns well with the dataset's tags. Despite its high memory requirement in general, it is capable of short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it efficient for this medium-sized dataset. This aligns closely with the dataset's need for low memory usage, more so than its alternatives, based on their weaknesses with low memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is suitable for the given medium-sized, tabular, and balanced dataset as it specifically lists tabular data as one of its strengths. It also has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data and is compatible with GPU acceleration, which may help in reducing memory usage compared to CPU. Although VAE generally requires high memory, it does have a short training time and has been effectively applied to large datasets, making it a reasonable choice under low memory constraints compared to other models which have explicit weaknesses in low memory usage. Additionally, VAE's weaknesses are mostly irrelevant to the provided dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is suitable for the given dataset properties because it is designed to work well with tabular data, which aligns with the data type of the dataset. The dataset is medium-sized and balanced, which fits well with VAE's capability of handling tabular data and medium datasets. Additionally, VAE has a short training time and does not inherently require low memory, which matches the requirement of low memory constraints. Although VAE requires high memory, it provides a compromise given the dataset characteristics, as other models with low memory have more significant weaknesses related to the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for medium-sized, balanced, tabular data, as it explicitly lists tabular data as a strength. It handles high-dimensional datasets and can operate efficiently with high memory setups. While AutoEncoder prefers a GPU setup, the requirement for low memory is a challenge, but it seems to be less of a hindrance than the weaknesses of other models. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which aligns well with the given dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is well-suited for medium-sized tabular data, aligning with the dataset's properties. It handles tabular data efficiently, supports high dimensionality, and offers short training time with scalability to large datasets. Despite requiring high memory, it excels in tabular data tasks and can meet the low memory requirement better than other models, which often pose lack of support for tabular data or have longer training times. Additionally, AutoEncoder is capable of handling balanced data efficiently." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for medium-sized, balanced tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties provided. It has strengths in handling tabular data and is capable of dealing with high-dimensionality and noisy data. The model also supports GPU, which is beneficial for efficient computation. While it typically requires high memory, its short training time compensates for this, aligning with the dataset's low memory requirement. Among the models in the list, VAE's strengths make it the most appropriate choice given the dataset characteristics and additional requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. The data size being medium aligns with VAE's ability to handle large datasets efficiently. Although VAE does require high memory, its capability to manage high dimensionality, short training time, and compatibility with tabular data make it the best choice given the dataset's characteristics and requirements. Weaknesses related to discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data are not issues here since the provided dataset is balanced." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It has strengths in handling tabular data and high dimensionality, which fits well with the dataset characteristics. Although VAE requires high memory, it offers short training time and scalability to large datasets. Its proficiency with tabular data aligns with the dataset type, and it suits the balanced data due to its high model capacity. While it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and CPU processing, these do not conflict significantly with the given dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is chosen because it is well-suited for medium-sized, balanced tabular data, which matches the dataset's properties. It has strengths in handling tabular data with high dimensionality and noisy data, accommodating the needs perfectly. Additionally, AutoEncoder has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the low memory constraint to some extent. Although it requires higher memory, its strengths outweigh its weaknesses for this scenario, making it the best available choice from the list provided." + } + ], + "wbc": [ + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and satisfies the low-memory requirement, given that it excels on sparse and imbalanced data, which are common characteristics of low-signal data. Its strengths include working efficiently with CPU resources and demonstrating short training times. Despite its computational demands, these are more manageable than the memory requirements or GPU dependencies of other models. LUNAR's ability to scale to large datasets ensures adaptability to medium-sized data while effectively handling low-dimensional features." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it supports tabular data well, aligns with the CPU and low memory constraints due to its short training time, and handles medium-sized datasets effectively. While it may have weaknesses related to high memory, the dataset's characteristics such as being medium in size and tabular make LUNAR a viable option among the given models. Additionally, despite the low-signal data challenge, LUNAR's capacity to manage imbalanced and sparse data themes may provide some advantage in managing low-signal data scenarios." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data with low signal that needs to be processed on a CPU with low memory. AutoEncoder is adept at handling tabular data and medium-size datasets while dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data. Despite its weakness in low-signal data and CPU environments, it offers short training time and scalability, making it a suitable choice considering the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is suitable for tabular data and is designed to handle low-dimensional datasets with sparse and imbalanced data. It excels in scenarios requiring short training times and scalability to large datasets, aligning with the medium data size and CPU/low memory constraints specified. Additionally, its strengths in tabular data make it an appropriate choice, despite its high memory weakness, as no other model perfectly fits all requirements with respect to low-signal data and low memory; however, LUNAR's ability to handle sparse data compensates for low-signal challenges." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it handles tabular data well, which aligns with the dataset type. Despite primarily requiring GPU, VAE's short training time can compensate for CPU constraints to a certain extent. Its capabilities for medium-sized datasets, combined with managing low-memory environments occasionally, make it a reasonable fit for low-signal data, given other models have significant weaknesses here." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and constraints. It specifically handles 'tabular data' efficiently and is capable of operating on 'low-dimensional datasets', which aligns with the current 'medium' size and 'low-signal data' characteristics. Additionally, LUNAR has strengths in scalability and short training time, which can be beneficial considering the 'low memory' requirement and 'CPU' preference. While it has some weaknesses for high memory use and computational intensity, these are mitigated by its ability to handle imbalanced and sparse data in tabular formats effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model as it specifically supports tabular data, which aligns well with the dataset type. It is also efficient with low-memory requirements, which fits the dataset's additional requirements of CPU and low memory. Furthermore, LUNAR handles sparse and imbalanced data well, which may align with the low-signal data tag. Despite some weaknesses with noisy data and high memory issues, these do not conflict significantly with the specific requirements of the provided dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and is designed to handle low-dimensional datasets, which matches the dataset's medium size and tabular data type. LUNAR supports CPU processing, is low memory intensive, and offers short training times, aligning with the additional constraints of low memory and CPU usage. Although this dataset is tagged as low-signal, which is not LUNAR's strongest area, it is the best available option from the list considering the dataset's characteristics and the other models' weaknesses in tabular or CPU-based settings." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it specifically handles tabular data, which matches the dataset type provided. It is designed to work well with low-dimensional datasets and CPU constraints, fitting the low-memory requirement. Despite being somewhat sensitive to hyperparameters, LUNAR has a short training time and scalability, making it suitable for a medium-sized dataset. While it may not fully address low-signal data, its strengths align better with the dataset properties compared to other models, which have notable weaknesses related to low-signal data or CPU usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It operates well with low-dimensional datasets and sparse data, aligning with the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset. LUNAR also has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets without requiring high memory, which fits the additional requirements of CPU and low memory constraints. While hyperparameter sensitivity is a concern, it does not outweigh the fit to dataset characteristics compared to the weaknesses found in other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the best choice because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also suitable for datasets requiring low memory and operates well with CPU, addressing the additional dataset requirements. It efficiently manages medium-sized datasets and low-signal data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite being GPU-optimized and having some computational intensity issues, its ability to handle low-dimensional and imbalanced data makes it the most fitting model for the given dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is medium-sized tabular data which requires low memory and CPU usage, with the additional challenge of being low-signal data. VAE supports tabular data, handles high dimensionality and noisy data, and has a short training time. While it generally favors GPU and high memory systems, among the model options, it aligns best with the dataset's type and requirements, especially for tabular data, and has a short training time beneficial for development efficiency." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles low-dimensional datasets effectively and can deal with sparse or imbalanced data efficiently. It operates on GPU, supporting short training times and large dataset scalability, meeting the 'medium' data size requirement despite its 'computationally intensive' drawback. Furthermore, it aligns with the 'low memory' requirement by avoiding high memory usage associated with other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It can handle low-dimensional datasets efficiently and is scalable to large datasets, making it suitable for the medium data size. Moreover, it has low memory requirements and a short training time, which align with the CPU and low memory constraints of the dataset. Although it has some weaknesses with noisy data and is computationally intensive, the other models have more deficiencies with low-signal data or require higher memory or GPU, making LUNAR the best fit given the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected as it aligns best with the dataset's characteristics. Given the medium-sized, tabular data that is low-signal and requires CPU with low memory, LUNAR has strengths in handling tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, and can be utilized with short training time despite the low memory constraint. Although LUNAR requires GPU and is computationally intensive, it is the most suitable model considering the other options have significant weaknesses like poor performance with low-signal data or reliance on GPU and high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is a suitable choice for tabular data with low signal, characteristic of medium-sized datasets. It performs well with sparse and imbalanced data while utilizing GPU efficiently and providing short training times. Although LUNAR's high computational intensity can be a downside, it aligns closely with the dataset requirements for low memory and CPU limitations compared to other models that have higher memory demands and longer training times." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data and is designed for low-dimensional datasets, matching the dataset's characteristics of being medium in size and tabular. Additionally, it requires low memory and CPU, aligning well with the dataset's constraints. While LUNAR has a weakness with noisy data, this is not a significant issue given the dataset's primary characteristic of low-signal data rather than noisy data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen as it aligns well with the dataset properties. It is suited for tabular data, operates efficiently on CPU with low memory usage, and can handle medium-sized datasets. Although it's sensitive to hyperparameters, it has the benefits of short training time and scalability, which are essential given the CPU and low-memory requirements. The ability to work well with low-dimensional datasets is an additional strength that complements the dataset's low-signal characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is specifically designed for tabular data and works well with low memory and CPU resources as per the dataset requirements. It is also suitable for medium-sized datasets and avoids the weaknesses related to noisy data. Despite being computationally intensive, its short training time aligns well with the need for CPU-efficient operations, making it the best fit given the low-signal characteristic and the constraints outlined by the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice as it is explicitly designed to handle tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. It also accommodates the need for handling medium-sized data, offering scalability to large datasets with short training times. Although it runs on GPU and can be computationally intensive, it does not require excessive memory, aligning with the low-memory requirement. Additionally, while it can be sensitive to hyperparameters, it is less influenced by the low-signal data characteristic compared to some others in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected because it is suitable for tabular data and can handle high dimensionality efficiently, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. The model has a short training time and can be scaled to large datasets, making it suitable for medium-sized data. While it has a weakness for low-signal data, it is more compatible with the requirements (CPU and low memory) compared to other options in the list like DevNet and ALAD, which have notable weaknesses for low-signal data and high memory requirements. AutoEncoder handles noisy data and tabular formats well, while the other models like AnoGAN, DevNet, and ALAD have significant weaknesses with tabular data or low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It has strengths in handling low-dimensional datasets, aligning with the low-signal characteristic. Although it requires high memory, it is CPU-capable, which satisfies the additional requirement. LUNAR also offers short training times, which is beneficial given the medium-sized dataset and CPU constraints, making it the most fitting choice among the given options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it specifically caters to tabular data and supports low-dimensional datasets with its capability of handling sparse and imbalanced data effectively. Although high memory might be a concern, the model's compatibility with CPU and short training time align well with the dataset's low memory requirement. Furthermore, LUNAR can handle datasets with low signal efficiently, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and can handle imbalanced and sparse data which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It has a short training time and does not require high memory, matching the additional requirements of CPU and low memory. Although LUNAR shows weaknesses in handling noisy data and requires careful hyperparameter tuning, its strengths in handling the tabular format and quick scalability make it the most compatible choice given the dataset's medium size and need for computational efficiency." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset since it is compatible with tabular data and has a short training time, which aligns with the dataset's medium size and low memory requirements. Although it has a weakness for CPU usage, it handles tabular data efficiently, making it a balanced choice given the other options, which are less suited due to either not supporting tabular data or having other significant weaknesses related to the dataset properties like low-signal data or high memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and constraints. It specifically handles tabular data well, which aligns with the dataset's structure. LUNAR is also designed for low-dimensional and sparse data, which matches the low-signal characteristic of this dataset. Despite the CPU requirement noted as a weakness, its strengths such as short training time and scalability to large datasets make it a viable option for a medium-sized dataset with low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is designed to handle tabular data, which matches our dataset type. Additionally, it is suitable for medium-sized datasets, offers scalability to large datasets, and focuses on imbalanced and sparse data. While it uses GPU, one of its weaknesses is hyperparameter sensitivity, but for low memory requirements, it is a better fit compared to other models, which either require high memory or are not optimized for CPU. Furthermore, none of the models explicitly handle low-signal data well, making LUNAR a more balanced choice given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is suitable for tabular data and can handle medium-sized datasets efficiently on a CPU. It supports low-memory operations and is designed for short training time, making it ideal for constrained memory environments. While it is sensitive to noisy data, it doesn't have the same degree of weakness for low-signal data as other models such as DevNet or ALAD, making it the most balanced choice for this dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected as the most suitable model because it is designed to handle tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It operates effectively on low-dimensional datasets, which might be beneficial given that the dataset is characterized as low-signal data. LUNAR also has strengths in handling imbalanced and sparse data, which are common challenges in low-signal data scenarios. Additionally, it supports short training times and scalability to large datasets, making it efficient in terms of both time and resource use, fitting the CPU and low memory requirements. Despite its use of GPUs mainly, its ability to perform well with the dataset's characteristics makes it the best option given the limitations of other models related to low-signal data or CPU compatibility." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected as it is strong in handling tabular data, which is the type of this dataset. Additionally, it supports low-dimensional datasets and sparse data, which might align with the 'low-signal data' characteristic. LUNAR also benefits from short training time and scalability to large datasets, which are advantageous given the medium data size. Despite its weakness in noisy data, the model is preferred due to the dataset's 'low memory' requirement as it doesn't list high memory usage as a limitation, and it can be computationally supported with a CPU." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for medium-sized tabular data and possesses strengths in handling noise, a common issue in low-signal data. While it generally performs better on high memory systems and GPU, its strengths align more closely with the dataset requirements than the other models. Despite its slight limitation on CPU-based systems, it remains one of the few models that effectively handle tabular data, which is crucial given the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it handles tabular data effectively, which matches the dataset type. Although the dataset has low-signal data, VAE's strengths in tabular data outweigh its weaknesses. It uses high memory and a GPU, fitting the dataset's low memory constraint on a CPU, making it more suitable than others. VAE's short training time and good performance on medium-sized datasets and scalability align well with the dataset size of medium without large computational demands." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and requirements. The dataset is medium-sized, tabular in format, and requires the model to operate on a CPU with low memory usage. While VAE's main strength is handling tabular data, it also performs well on medium-sized datasets and has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low-memory requirement. Although VAE typically requires GPU and high memory for optimal performance, its adaptability to tabular data and strong capacity for high-dimensional data processing make it preferable over other options, which either don't handle tabular data well or have significant weaknesses in terms of memory usage and computational resource requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and scales to medium-sized datasets with low memory requirements, matching the given dataset properties. It supports short training times and is capable of handling imbalanced and sparse data, aligning well with the 'low memory' and 'CPU' constraints. Its weaknesses, such as noisy data and high memory, are less concerning given the dataset characteristics of 'low-signal data' and 'medium size'." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice because it supports tabular data, which is the dataset's type, and is optimized for low-dimensional datasets. Its strengths include handling sparse and imbalanced data, which could be relevant due to the low-signal nature. Additionally, it is designed for short training times and scalable to large datasets, making it compatible with a medium-sized dataset and CPU requirements. Although there is a mention of high memory usage among its weaknesses, other models have significant weaknesses like low-signal data issues or are primarily GPU-optimized, which makes LUNAR the best fit overall given the conditions." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice given the dataset tags and requirements. It is specifically strong with tabular data, which matches the data type we have, and works well with low memory use and short training times. Although LUNAR typically uses GPU, its overall strengths in handling tabular data and short training times outweigh any weaknesses associated with high memory use. Additionally, LUNAR does not have a particular weakness for low-signal data, making it an appropriate choice for the given dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and handles low-dimensional datasets well, which aligns with the medium-sized, tabular nature of the dataset. It is designed to operate in environments with limited memory and CPU, important given the dataset's low memory requirement. Although it has weaknesses with high memory and noisy data, its strengths in short training time and scalability make it a fitting choice over other models, considering the low-signal aspect and resource constraints of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the data type provided. It also handles high dimensionality and noisy data, which can align with low-signal data characteristics. Although it has a weakness in using CPU and low memory environments, other models have more severe weaknesses for this scenario, making VAE the most balanced choice given the dataset properties and computational constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) model is recommended because it aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It supports tabular data and is suitable for moderate-sized datasets. While it generally benefits from GPU, it also offers short training time which helps in situations with CPU constraints. Although VAE typically requires higher memory, its capability in handling low-signal data\u2014while not a direct strength noted\u2014overrides the other models, whose weaknesses more directly conflict with the dataset tags, especially those that require low memory and CPU constraints. Moreover, other models like ALAD and AutoEncoder have explicit weaknesses with low-signal data or CPU, making VAE a more balanced choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it supports tabular data and is suitable for medium-sized datasets. Despite being a model that typically requires high memory and GPU, it satisfies the tabular data requirement and can handle sparse and imbalanced data efficiently, which aligns well with the given dataset characteristics. While low-signal data is a noted weakness, the focus on tabular data makes it the least conflicting choice among those available. Also, it is scalable to larger datasets which is advantageous in moderate dataset handling." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AE1SVM", + "reason": "AE1SVM is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, which matches our dataset's type. Despite its weakness in CPU and low memory environments, it has a strong ability to handle imbalanced and sparse data as well as high dimensionality, which provides versatility. Additionally, while not perfect for low-signal data, the availability of short training times can be beneficial for optimizing model performance without excessive computational costs. Other models either perform poorly on tabular or low-signals, rely heavily on GPU or high memory, or have longer training times, making them less optimal for the described dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the dataset properties provided. It supports tabular data and is designed to handle low-dimensional datasets, which aligns well with the 'low-signal data' characteristic. It is also efficient on CPU and has low memory requirements, which matches the 'CPU' and 'low memory' constraints of the dataset. Unlike other models, it doesn't have a significant weakness for low-signal data, making it an optimal choice despite some weaknesses in noisy data and hyperparameter sensitivity, which are not primary dataset concerns." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for this dataset. The dataset consists of medium-sized tabular data with low-signal characteristics. Although VAE has a weakness with CPU usage, it is strong with tabular data, short training time, and handling noisy data, which aligns closely with the dataset characteristics. Other models have significant weaknesses with low-signal data or are more suited to GPU and high memory, which contradicts the requirement for CPU and low memory usage. Therefore, despite the CPU limitation, VAE is the best trade-off given these constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected due to its strong suitability for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It specializes in handling low-dimensional and sparse datasets, fitting the dataset tag well, and has the advantage of short training time. Moreover, it operates efficiently on CPU and is less memory-intensive compared to other options. Despite LUNAR's sensitivity to hyperparameters, its ability to manage tabular data on a CPU with low memory requirements makes it the most suitable choice for the given dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is suitable for tabular data and is designed to handle low-dimensional datasets, which may be advantageous for low-signal data. It also operates well with CPUs and has low memory requirements, addressing the additional requirements provided. Despite its weaknesses in handling noisy data and being computationally intensive, it is the best fit among the available models for the given dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is best suited for this scenario as it aligns well with the dataset properties. It supports tabular data, which matches the given data type, and it is efficient in low-dimensional datasets, addressing the low-signal data characteristic. Despite its weakness with high memory requirements, it provides a good balance for medium data size, operates effectively on CPU, and has short training time, which is advantageous given the low memory constraint." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice because it specifically excels with tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also designed for low-dimensional datasets, meeting the low-signal characteristic of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR is efficient with short training time and scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the medium data size and low memory requirements, making it compatible with CPU processing." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it is suitable for tabular data and medium-sized datasets. While it typically requires more memory, it is well-suited for scenarios that involve high dimensionality and noisy data. Despite the low-signal nature of the dataset, VAE has the best compatibility with the requirement for working on CPU-based systems compared to other options, though the memory constraint is a consideration. Models like DevNet, AnoGAN, and AutoEncoder were less suitable due to their drawbacks with low-signal data or CPU incompatibility." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties and resource constraints. It is well-suited for tabular data, matches the requirement for handling low memory contexts, and can efficiently handle datasets with low-signal characteristics thanks to its sensitivity to features. Moreover, LUNAR's strengths in handling low-dimensional tabular datasets align well with the medium data size requirement, and while it typically requires a GPU for optimal performance, it does not suffer significantly from low memory constraints like some other models in the list. Additionally, it offers short training times which is ideal given the CPU requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data and low-dimensional datasets. It also offers a short training time, making it efficient for medium data sizes. Although it employs GPU for improved performance, the low memory requirement and CPU usage requirement are critical due to its select strengths that align with tabular data without the need for high memory resources, which compensates for its computational intensity. Unlike others, LUNAR is less affected by the low-signal data present in the dataset." + } + ], + "glass": [ + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is specifically designed for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Additionally, LUNAR is efficient for low-dimensional datasets and offers short training times, making it a good fit for handling small datasets while being scalable to large datasets if necessary. It also effectively deals with sparse and imbalanced data, which are common concerns in low-signal datasets. Although it poses some memory concerns, its strengths in handling tabular and low-signal datasets outweigh these challenges, especially given the constraints of low memory and small data sizes." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is specifically strong with tabular data and is suitable for low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. It also meets the requirement of being suitable for a small data size due to its short training time and ability to scale to a variety of dataset sizes without high memory demands. Despite its hyperparameter sensitivity, it is the best fit among the available options given the dataset's characteristics as low-signal data with low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for small tabular datasets and can handle low-signal data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. It supports tabular data and has a short training time, essential for low memory environments. Although it has some weaknesses with imbalanced and sparse data, these issues are less critical given the dataset constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and works well even with noisy data, which is important considering the dataset's characteristics of low-signal data. Even though small data size is a challenge, VAE is capable of handling it better among the options available. It requires low memory compared to many other models, and has a short training time, making it a good fit given the requirement for low memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Despite the dataset being tagged as low-signal, LUNAR does not explicitly have a weakness in this area compared to others. Additionally, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets, supports low-dimensional datasets, and has short training time, all of which are beneficial even for small data sizes. Importantly, it suits low memory requirements better than other models listed, which often require high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the best choice as it specifically excels with tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles low-dimensional datasets effectively, relevant for small data with low-signal characteristics and is able to work with low memory constraints due to its short training time. While LUNAR can be computationally intensive and sensitive to hyperparameters, these weaknesses are less critical for small datasets with low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is chosen because it specifically supports tabular data, works well with low-dimensional datasets, and is noted for its short training time, which is advantageous for a small dataset. Additionally, it does not have significant memory requirements which align with the dataset's low memory need. Although it is sensitive to hyperparameters, its suitability for tabular and sparse data, combined with robust scalability, makes it an optimal choice for this small, low-memory, low-signal dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data and has short training time, which aligns with the requirement of handling a small dataset with low memory usage. It handles tabular data well and can work with high dimensionality, addressing the low-signal data characteristic of the dataset. While it is not optimized for low memory, its capability to handle tabular data makes it the best fit from the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it supports tabular data, which is the type of the given dataset. Even though it generally handles larger datasets, it performs well with low memory usage and has the ability for short training times which is suitable given the requirement for low memory. Its weakness with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data isn't major given the dataset characteristics, which focus more on low-signal data rather than data balance." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is chosen because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which is applicable to the dataset's data type. Despite having weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced data, VAE is well-suited for low memory and small data sizes due to its short training time. Additionally, it can efficiently process high-dimensionality and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics of being low-signal. VAE also supports GPU usage, which might help mitigate the low memory requirement by optimizing computation." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and can handle low-dimensional datasets, matching our dataset type and characteristics. Despite having weaknesses related to noisy data, LUNAR does not explicitly have weaknesses for small datasets and low memory, which are critical requirements for our scenario. Furthermore, it offers short training time and scalability, making it an appropriate choice for handling the provided dataset's constraints effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for tabular data and handles imbalanced and sparse datasets efficiently. While it has high memory usage, its strengths in short training time and scalability make it optimal for small datasets, especially given the low-signal data characteristics where it fits better than other options. The weaknesses related to high memory and hyperparameter sensitivity are balanced by its compatibility with tabular data and a shorter training time, which satisfies the low-memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Although it generally performs better on larger datasets, it can still be used for small datasets unlike other options. It requires low memory usage during training, which aligns with the dataset's additional requirements. While VAE has some weaknesses with certain types of data, its support for tabular data and low memory usage makes it the most appropriate choice given the limitations of the other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is chosen because it handles tabular data effectively and is suitable for datasets with high dimensionality and noisy data, which are characteristics that may align with low-signal data. Despite requiring high memory, which is a concern for this dataset tag, VAE stands out for its ability to process tabular data efficiently, which is crucial given the dataset's small size and tabular nature. The short training time also adds an advantage in conditions where computational resources may be limited." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model due to its strengths in handling tabular data and its capability to work with low-dimensional and sparse datasets. It aligns well with the dataset properties of being small, tabular, and low-memory, while not having weaknesses that heavily contradict these properties. Other models either have weaknesses in dealing explicitly with small datasets or tabular data, or require high memory, making them less suitable." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It has strengths for handling high dimensionality and short training time. Although VAE typically requires a larger dataset, it is the best option given the constraints, especially since it can handle tabular data with higher dimensionality and short training time, balancing the dataset's small size and low-signal characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. Although it's strong on larger datasets, it has the advantage of handling low-signal data better than the other models in the list. It also operates efficiently in a low memory setting compared to others that have high memory requirements. While it is not specifically optimized for small datasets, its strengths in tabular data make it the best fit given the model choices." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type. Additionally, it performs well with low-dimensional datasets and is scalable to large datasets while offering short training time, making it suitable for low-signal data. Despite needing GPU, LUNAR's strength in low-memory situations and compatibility with small datasets aligns it better than other models in the list considering the given constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. The key strengths of LUNAR include handling tabular data and low-dimensional datasets, which aligns well with the dataset tags. Additionally, LUNAR's short training time and scalability make it a better fit given the requirement of low memory. Even though it has hypersensitivity and is computationally intensive, these issues are more manageable compared to the weaknesses of other models, such as their inability to handle small data sizes or low-signal data effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is most suitable for the dataset properties because it has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It also performs well with low-dimensional datasets and sparse data, which align with the characteristics of low-signal data. It has the advantage of short training time and scalability to large datasets, which is beneficial for small data sizes and low memory requirements. Though not explicitly mentioned for low memory, its scalability and short training time suggest efficient use of resources, making it the best fit among other options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it supports tabular data, requires a short training time, is scalable to large datasets, and does not demand high memory. These strengths align with the dataset requirements: tabular data, low memory, and small data size. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data and high memory usage, it has fewer incompatibilities with the given dataset than the other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and is suitable for scenarios with low memory requirements and short training time, as indicated by its strengths. Although it has weaknesses like handling discrete or categorical data, these are not mentioned as characteristics of the dataset. Other models either have weaknesses such as handling small data size or low-signal data, or they are not suited for tabular data, which excludes them as suitable choices." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. Despite its weakness with discrete or categorical data, VAE has strengths in handling tabular data, which matches the dataset's 'tabular data' type. While the dataset is small, leading to a potential drawback for VAE, its short training time and ability to handle noise make it an appropriate choice. Moreover, VAE's low memory requirement aligns with the dataset's additional requirement of 'low memory', providing an efficient and effective solution for the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for small tabular datasets, aligning with the dataset's characteristics. It supports tabular data, and while it uses GPU and high memory, it offers a short training time. Despite the low-signal data being a concern, VAE's ability to handle short training times makes it more viable than other options, which have more critical weaknesses for small datasets, low memory, and tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it performs well on tabular data and small data sizes given its capacity for efficient handling of low-dimensional datasets and short training time, which fits the low memory requirement. Although it has weaknesses with noisy data and high memory, these are not prioritized concerns given the dataset's characteristics. The model's scalability to large datasets and dealing with imbalanced data are additional benefits, which infer flexibility and adaptability in unexplored areas of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset due to its strengths in handling tabular data, short training time, and scalability to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Although the dataset is small and low-signal, LUNAR does not have specific weaknesses in these areas, making it a viable choice given the constraints of low memory usage and the requirement to use tabular data effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it handles tabular data well, which fits the dataset type. Despite potential weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, its strengths like short training time and capability to work on high-dimensional and low-memory configurations make it suitable for a small dataset with low-signal data while ensuring efficient memory usage." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for this scenario due to its compatibility with tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. Furthermore, it has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low-memory requirement, and it can effectively handle noisy data, a characteristic that can help manage low-signal data. Despite its strength in handling more significant datasets, the VAE's versatility with tabular data and its effectiveness in scenarios where memory efficiency is crucial make it a more favorable choice compared to the other models in the list, which have limitations with small data or low-memory settings." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular data, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It supports low-dimensional datasets and operates with low memory requirements, addressing the dataset's characteristics and additional requirements. Additionally, it has a short training time, which is advantageous for small data sizes. Therefore, LUNAR best meets the dataset's needs compared to the other models listed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular data, aligns with the requirement for low memory usage due to its short training time, and handles sparse and imbalanced data effectively, which could be beneficial for low-signal data. Although it has some weaknesses, such as high memory and hyperparameter sensitivity, the match to the dataset's characteristics makes it the most suitable choice from the provided options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. Although VAE typically requires large datasets and has a high memory requirement, it is one of the few models that supports tabular data in the list. Given its strength in handling tabular data and short training time, it can be optimized for small datasets. Additionally, VAE does well with noisy data which can compensate somewhat for the low-signal aspect of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice for this dataset because it is well-suited for tabular, low-dimensional data and supports small datasets. Moreover, it has strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced datasets, while having low memory requirements and short training time, which aligns with the additional requirement of low memory usage in the dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is suitable for small tabular datasets, which matches the dataset's characteristics. It handles sparse and imbalanced data, which may relate to the low-signal data in the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR requires low memory usage and has short training times, making it ideal for the specified low memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for tabular data with low-dimensional datasets, which matches the dataset type (tabular) and small size. It has strengths in handling sparse and imbalanced data, and it operates efficiently with low memory requirements, making it a good fit for the given characteristics and additional requirements of low memory. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time, making it a practical choice for datasets with low-signal data where complex models might not yield significant benefits." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is chosen because it is suitable for tabular data and small data size, which align with the dataset's requirements. It offers strengths like handling low-dimensional datasets and short training time, while being scalable to large datasets. Despite weaknesses like hyperparameter sensitivity, LUNAR's capabilities make it the best fit for the given low-signal, low-memory dataset scenario compared to other models, which generally struggle with small data size or low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice as it is specifically strong with tabular data and small datasets, which matches the dataset properties. Its strengths include low-dimensional datasets and short training time, which align with the requirements for handling low memory environments and low-signal data, despite its sensitivity to hyperparameters. Although other models have certain strengths with tabular data, they tend to struggle with small data sizes or low-signal data, making LUNAR the best fit for the given requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, low-dimensional datasets, and sparse data. It also offers short training time and scalability to large datasets, which can be an advantage given the low-memory requirement. While LUNAR is sensitive to hyperparameters, it uniquely matches the use case of low-memory tabular data better than the alternatives, especially since most other models face significant weaknesses with small data sizes, low signals, or memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is a suitable choice as it supports tabular data and features like low memory usage and short training time, aligning well with the dataset's properties of small data size and low memory requirement. Despite its weaknesses with imbalanced data, this is not a highlighted concern for the dataset, making VAE a balanced choice considering its strengths and the limitations of other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it supports tabular data and is well-suited for handling low-dimensional and sparse datasets. It is efficient in terms of memory usage, which aligns with the low memory requirement of the dataset. Additionally, LUNAR has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, making it a robust choice despite its computational intensity weakness. Furthermore, its strengths address low-dimensionality and imbalanced data, which are often characteristics of low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is well-suited for tabular data, which corresponds with the dataset characteristics. Although it does not specifically mention handling small datasets, it offers short training time and scalability, which can be beneficial for low memory environments. Its ability to handle sparse and imbalanced data, coupled with low-dimensional datasets, makes it a suitable choice compared to other options that either struggle with small datasets or are less aligned with the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for this dataset due to its compatibility with tabular data and its capability to handle low-dimensional datasets, which aligns with the small data size requirement. Additionally, it is designed for low memory consumption and short training times, making it a better fit compared to other models with high memory requirements or long training times. Despite the dataset being labeled as low-signal, LUNAR's strengths and lack of significant weaknesses in this context make it the optimal choice from the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties. It supports tabular data and is known for working with low-dimensional datasets, aligning with the 'small' and 'low memory' requirements. Although 'low-signal data' is not its strength, it's less unsuitable than other models in the list, as many other models are ineffective with small datasets or require high memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model because it explicitly supports tabular data and functions well with small datasets due to its short training time. Moreover, it addresses the requirement of low memory usage better than alternatives that have high memory demands. Despite its weakness with imbalanced data, VAE's strengths are more aligned with the dataset characteristics compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is well-suited for small, low-memory environments with tabular data. It excels in handling tabular data and requires short training time, which aligns with the dataset requirements. Although LUNAR has computationally intensive operations, it is tailored for low-memory and tabular datasets, making it the best fit when considering both the dataset characteristics and model weaknesses of others in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model given the dataset properties of small data size, tabular data, and low memory requirements. It supports tabular data effectively and is efficient with short training time. While LUNAR is computationally intensive, it does not explicitly have a weakness for low memory scenarios compared to other models, which makes it a comparatively better choice. Furthermore, it is scalable to large datasets, which indicates it is robust enough to handle the dataset within memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and has a relatively short training time, which meets the dataset's characteristics of low memory and small size. While it does not excel in low-signal data, it is more aligned with the 'tabular data' requirement compared to other models. Moreover, it offers strengths in handling tabular data and has a modest memory footprint when tailored correctly, making it preferable for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "Given the dataset requirements, VAE is the best choice due to its strengths in handling tabular data and its adaptability to small datasets. While VAE typically requires high memory, it balances this with short training times, which may offset the memory constraint to some extent. Furthermore, VAE can effectively deal with the challenge of low-signal data better than the other models in the evaluation, which typically have weaknesses associated with small data sizes or memory constraints. On balance, VAE aligns best with the dataset tags despite some memory demands." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it supports tabular data and is adept at handling sparse and imbalanced data, both of which may be relevant for low-signal datasets. Additionally, it offers a short training time and scalability, which is crucial given the low-memory requirement. Despite its weaknesses with noisy data and high memory usage, its overall strengths align better with the requirements than other models, especially since it can handle tabular data and maintain a smaller computational footprint compared to others." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it handles tabular data effectively and is designed for low-dimensional datasets, which is compatible with the 'small' data size and 'low-signal data' characteristics. Additionally, it requires short training time and is scalable, which balances well with the 'low memory' requirement. Although it has weaknesses in terms of noisy data, the strengths in handling tabular data and the capacity to work with small and sparse datasets make it the best fit among the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for tabular data which matches the dataset tag. Despite its general preference for larger datasets, its strengths in handling tabular data and short training times make it a more viable option given the constraints. Its weakness with discrete or categorical data aligns with the potential challenges in the dataset, but it offers a balanced set of strengths fitting well with the dataset's small size and requirement for low memory. It is the best fit among the available options considering the overall characteristics of the dataset and the other models' weaknesses in handling low-signal and small datasets." + } + ], + "satimage-2": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for large tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset tags of 'large' and 'tabular data'. It has strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data, and it is scalable to large datasets with a short training time which is advantageous given the 'low memory' requirement. Despite its requirement for high memory, its scalability and efficiency with large datasets make it the best choice among the listed models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties as it handles tabular data efficiently, which aligns with the dataset's data type. It is also scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, addressing the dataset's large size and low memory requirements. Although it has a weakness in handling noisy data, this is a lesser concern compared to other models whose major weaknesses align unfavorably with the dataset characteristics like low memory." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data with a large dataset size. It supports tabular data, has high memory needs, and is scalable to large datasets. Although it requires high memory, it offers a combination of short training times and the ability to manage high dimensionality. While AE1SVM and AutoEncoder also support tabular data, AE1SVM's weaknesses include lower memory, and AutoEncoder has some strengths redundant with VAE without addressing the need for lower memory, making VAE the more suitable option as it balances the data size and type properties along with the other requirements better than the other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is the best choice as it is suitable for tabular data and can handle high-dimensional and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset tag of 'tabular data'. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets, which matches the 'large' dataset size. Even though it requires high memory, it has a short training time which could compensate for memory usage, making it a viable option despite the requirement for 'low memory'." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It is specifically strong with tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which matches well with the 'large' data size and 'tabular data' tags. Despite its high memory requirement being a weakness, LUNAR supports short training times and does not focus on noisy data, which is not a characteristic mentioned in the dataset tags. Overall, it aligns well with the requirement for handling large-scale tabular data efficiently while meeting most of the provided criteria." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and requires a model with low memory usage. VAE supports tabular data, can handle large datasets, and has short training times, which aligns well with the dataset's properties. Despite its high memory weakness, it offers a better advantage over other models since they do not adequately support tabular data or low memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected as it supports tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset tags. Although VAE requires high memory, its short training time and ability to process noisy data make it a suitable choice given the additional requirement of low memory constraints relative to other models listed, as they either have bigger memory requirements or are not suitable for tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is suitable for large, tabular datasets and is scalable to large datasets with short training time, which aligns well with the dataset tag 'large'. Despite using more memory, it is designed to handle high-dimensional tabular data effectively. LUNAR's weaknesses are less critical for the given dataset, making it the most suitable option considering the low memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, which aligns with the dataset type. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and has short training time, which is advantageous when dealing with large data sizes. Although it is high memory, it is one of the options that meet the essential requirements, given the available choices. Other models either have critical weaknesses related to the dataset properties, such as supporting low memory or being applicable to tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and large datasets, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Although it requires high memory, it offers short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Its strengths in dealing with noisy data and high dimensionality are also beneficial. Despite a potential weakness with discrete or categorical data, the alignment with low memory requirements and tabular data makes VAE the most suitable choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for large tabular datasets and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. While it performs well with tabular data, its ability to handle high dimensionality, coupled with a short training time, addresses the dataset\u2019s need for low memory usage. Though VAE requires high memory, which is a slight mismatch, its strengths outweigh this aspect given the dataset's characteristics, making it the best choice from the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected due to its strength in handling tabular data, which matches the data type of the dataset. It is also scalable to large datasets, which is important given the large size of the dataset. Furthermore, LUNAR has a short training time which helps meet the low memory requirement. Despite its high memory usage as a weakness, its scalability and strength in tabular data make it the most suitable choice among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder model is selected because it is well-suited for large, tabular datasets, which matches the dataset characteristics. It has strengths in handling tabular data, high dimensionality, and noisy data, which are relevant to the dataset type. Additionally, it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, which addresses the requirement for low memory usage. Its weaknesses do not pertain to the significant characteristics or additional requirements of the dataset provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational AutoEncoder) is the most suitable model for this scenario because it is designed to handle tabular data and is known for managing large datasets, which aligns with the dataset properties. While it may have high memory usage, it compensates with short training times, making it feasible despite the additional low memory constraint. Its strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and short training times further enhance its suitability for the given dataset tags and the model's scalability requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable for large tabular datasets, and it performs well with high dimensionality and noisy data. It also has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets. Although it requires high memory, which is not a direct match for the 'low memory' requirement, no other models perfectly align while fitting other dataset characteristics. Considering all factors, AutoEncoder strikes a balance between the dataset's needs for tabular data handling, scalability, and training time efficiency." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns well with the dataset's properties of being large and tabular. Despite having high memory requirements, VAE offers short training times and can handle high dimensionality, which can be beneficial for complex tabular datasets. Its strengths in handling noisy data also add to its suitability given no explicit need for handling sparse or imbalanced data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for the given requirements as it works well with tabular data, which is the type of data in the dataset. It is also capable of handling large datasets, addressing the 'large' data size tag. Although the dataset has the 'low memory' constraint, VAE is one of the few models that can manage large datasets with a relatively short training time, making it more efficient memory-wise compared to other models. Despite its high memory demand as a weakness, it has better compatibility with the dataset characteristics compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which aligns with the dataset's requirements. VAE has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, making it suitable for this dataset. While it does have high memory requirements, the model compensates with short training times, which can be managed within the low memory constraint given the scalability and effectiveness in dealing with tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is selected because it explicitly supports tabular data, which is the type of data in this dataset. Additionally, VAE is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, making it suitable for a large dataset. Even though it requires high memory usage, which is a concern given the additional requirement of low memory, VAE's strength in handling tabular data and scalability are crucial advantages given other models have more critical weaknesses for this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for large tabular datasets and is scalable. Although it has high memory requirements, it aligns well with the dataset properties by supporting tabular data and handling large datasets efficiently. It also provides short training times, which is advantageous given the dataset's low memory requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets, which aligns with the dataset's properties. It has strengths in handling high dimensionality and noisy data, and is scalable to large datasets, addressing the need for low memory use. While it does require high memory, which is a slight concern, it offers short training times, making it a strong candidate for this application compared to other listed models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large and is tabular, and the AutoEncoder is well-suited for such data types, excelling in handling high dimensionality and noisy data. AutoEncoder also supports GPU processing, which is beneficial given the large data size, and it has a short training time, ensuring efficient processing of extensive datasets. Although it requires high memory, which is a consideration against the low memory requirement, it is more suitable than other models that either do not support tabular data or struggle with large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable choice because it is specifically designed for tabular data, which aligns with the data type tag in the dataset. It is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, addressing the requirement of handling a large dataset efficiently. Importantly, its weaknesses do not affect its capability to handle large tabular datasets with low memory demands, unlike other options which have memory limitations or are not suitable for tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for large tabular datasets, aligning well with the dataset requirements. It can handle high dimensionality and is scalable to large datasets. Despite requiring high memory, which is a weakness, its strengths, such as short training time and compatibility with tabular data, make it the best fit among the available models considering the low memory requirement. Other models either do not support tabular data, are less scalable, or have significant weaknesses that conflict more with the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable for large tabular datasets and handles high dimensionality well, which is a requirement given the dataset's properties. It also scales well to large datasets and has a short training time, which aligns with the need for low memory usage. Despite the general high memory requirement, the efficiency in scalability and the ability to manage large data while operating efficiently make it a suitable choice for this scenario." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data, which matches the dataset's data type, and it can handle large datasets efficiently. Despite its high memory requirement, it offers a short training time, which can be beneficial when considering large data sizes. While it does have weaknesses in processing sparse and discrete data, these are not mentioned as concerns in the dataset properties. It balances strengths of scalability and applicability to tabular data effectively according to the use case constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties because it handles tabular data efficiently, is scalable to large datasets, and has a short training time. Despite the dataset's requirement for low memory usage, LUNAR can still be a viable option due to its strengths in handling tabular and large datasets, aligning well with the large data size requirement. Additionally, its ability to process imbalanced and sparse data in tabular formats makes it a good fit, compensating somewhat for the low memory concern." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable due to its ability to handle large tabular datasets efficiently while also offering short training time. Although it requires high memory, which conflicts slightly with low memory requirement, it is the best compromise given it supports tabular data and large datasets. Other models either lack the capability to handle tabular data or have critical weaknesses like low scalability or high memory requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for the given dataset as it supports tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which fits well with the 'large' and 'tabular data' dataset tags. Additionally, it has a short training time and is efficient with GPU, helping overcome memory constraints, making it a suitable option given the 'low memory' requirement of the dataset. Its strength in handling high dimensionality and noisy data also aligns with the requirements, despite these not being explicitly specified in the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset properties indicate tabular data with a large size requirement and the need for low memory usage. Among the models listed, the AutoEncoder has strengths in handling tabular data and is scalable to large datasets. Although it generally requires high memory, its short training time makes it the most suitable choice given the options. Other models either do not support tabular data effectively, have limited scalability, or require more complex memory and computational resources." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is highly suitable as it supports tabular data, and is scalable to large datasets, aligning well with the dataset tags. Its ability to handle high-dimensionality and noisy data is beneficial. The main weakness of requiring high memory is partially contraindicated by the 'low memory' requirement of the dataset, however, among the available models, it provides the closest fit to the requirements while minimizing weaknesses impacting performance on large tabular datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable for large tabular datasets, which match the dataset properties. It handles high-dimensional and noisy data efficiently, utilizes GPU for better performance, and offers scalability to large datasets. While it requires high memory, which is a weakness given the 'low memory' requirement, it overall meets the dataset needs better than others. Most of the other models either do not support tabular data well or have significant limitations like low scalability or incompatibility with large datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is well-suited for large tabular datasets with high dimensionality. It handles noisy data efficiently, supports scalable learning with a GPU, and requires high memory, aligning with the dataset's large data size tag and tabular data type. Despite its high memory requirement, its other strengths match the needs of accommodating a large dataset, and it has a short training time, which is beneficial when considering low memory constraints. Other models with strengths in tabular data either have more constraints with memory or less efficiency handling large datasets or specific weaknesses that do not align well with the dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a suitable choice for this scenario as it supports tabular data and is scalable to large datasets. While it does require high memory, it offers a short training time and effectively handles large tabular datasets due to its strengths in dealing with high dimensionality and noisy data. These properties align well with the dataset requirements, except for the low memory constraint, but it best matches the overall needs compared to other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for large datasets and works well with tabular data, which matches the dataset's properties. While it has high memory requirements, so do most models, but VAE avoids specific disadvantages like long training time and limited scalability seen in others. Its ability to manage high dimensionality and noisy data is an added advantage given the dataset characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a suitable choice for large tabular datasets, which matches the dataset properties given. VAE can handle high dimensionality and noisy data well, which is often a characteristic of large datasets. Additionally, it has a strength in working with tabular data, making it appropriate for the dataset type. Though VAE is high in memory usage, it is scalable to large datasets and has a short training time, aligning with the need for low memory requirements given the other model options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It is also scalable to large datasets, aligning with the dataset's large size. Although it requires high memory, which is not ideal for low memory requirements, it offers short training times and performs well with high-dimensional and noisy data. Other models like VAE and ALAD also support tabular data but present similar memory requirements or have other weaknesses that are less ideal for the dataset characteristics. Therefore, despite the memory consideration, AutoEncoder offers the best overall alignment with the dataset properties among the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is well-suited for tabular, large datasets and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset properties. It also supports low memory consumption which meets the additional requirement specified. While it has minor weaknesses like hyperparameter sensitivity, those are less impactful compared to its strengths. Other models like AE1SVM and AutoEncoder have weaknesses such as low memory effectiveness that are critical for the given dataset requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The dataset is a large tabular dataset with a requirement for low memory usage. Among the models listed, LUNAR is suitable for tabular data and can handle large datasets efficiently. It also has a short training time, which accommodates the low memory requirement. While ALAD and AutoEncoder are also good for tabular data and large datasets, they typically require high memory, making LUNAR a more suitable choice given the additional low memory constraint." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) model is selected because it supports tabular data, which matches the dataset type, and is scalable to large datasets, which suits the dataset size. Although it has a high memory usage, it has a short training time, making it a potentially good fit despite the low memory requirement. Other models either do not handle tabular data effectively or face other significant weakness issues, especially with low memory and long training times, making VAE the most suitable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The dataset is large, tabular, and has low memory requirements. The AutoEncoder is well-suited for tabular data, is scalable to large datasets, and has a short training time, which is advantageous given the low memory requirement. Although it requires high memory, its capability to handle large datasets and tabular data outweighs this when considering the available model options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is the most suitable model for this large tabular dataset with additional requirements for low memory consumption. It excels in handling tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which is crucial given the dataset size. While AutoEncoder typically requires high memory, the low memory requirement is the only significant mismatch. Other models like AE1SVM, ALAD, and LUNAR also cater to large tabular datasets, but AutoEncoder has fewer weaknesses contradictory to the dataset's needs, making it the most balanced choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is best suited for large tabular datasets, which matches the provided dataset properties. Moreover, it is designed to work with low memory requirements and has a short training time, both of which align well with the additional requirements. Despite its computational intensity, its capabilities in handling large, tabular, and imbalanced datasets make it the most appropriate choice given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "The LUNAR model is chosen because it supports tabular data and is scalable to large datasets, which matches the dataset properties. It is also noted for having short training times and being relatively efficient with regard to memory, which aligns with the additional requirement for low memory usage. Despite weaknesses in memory sensitivity, its strengths in dealing with imbalanced and sparse data, along with compatibility with GPUs, make it a suitable choice for the dataset's requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is large and consists of tabular data with a requirement for low memory usage. VAE is suitable for large datasets and works well with tabular data. While VAE typically requires high memory, it can handle large datasets and provides a balance in terms of short training time. Given the available models, VAE aligns most closely with the dataset characteristics, despite the need for careful memory management." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for the given dataset as it handles tabular data effectively, which is one of the strengths required for this dataset type. The dataset is large, and VAE can scale well with large datasets. While it has high memory requirements, it meets the criteria for low memory better than other models in the list as they face various issues with either scalability or are not optimal for tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "AutoEncoder is selected as it is well-suited for tabular data, can handle large datasets, and performs well with high dimensionality and noisy data. Despite its weaknesses with imbalanced data and the need for high memory, its scalability and compatibility with the dataset characteristics make it the most appropriate choice given the low memory requirement and dataset properties." + }, + { + "selected_model": "AutoEncoder", + "reason": "The AutoEncoder is suitable for 'large' tabular datasets, as it can handle 'tabular data' effectively and is 'scalable to large datasets'. It also has 'high dimensionality' support and a 'short training time', making it a good fit for large datasets. While it does require 'high memory', it does not have 'low memory' as a weakness like some other models. Moreover, the AutoEncoder can handle 'noisy data', which can be beneficial depending on the dataset's characteristics. Overall, it balances the strengths needed for the given dataset requirements while minimizing weaknesses." + }, + { + "selected_model": "LUNAR", + "reason": "LUNAR is selected because it is suitable for tabular data and can handle large datasets efficiently, matching the dataset properties. Although it requires high memory and is computationally intensive, it does support low memory usage better than many other options. Additionally, LUNAR is scalable to large datasets and offers short training time, which aligns with the requirements of the provided dataset tags." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset is large and consists of tabular data with a low memory requirement. VAE is well-suited for large datasets and tabular data, making it a compatible choice. Although it requires high memory, it also offers a short training time and can handle noisy data and high dimensionality, which suits the potential dataset needs. Other models like AnoGAN and DevNet are less suited due to their weaknesses with tabular data and higher memory requirements, respectively." + } + ], + "vertebral": [ + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for the given dataset as it performs well on 'tabular data' and handles 'noisy data' effectively, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Despite the requirement for 'low memory', VAE's strengths in handling 'small' and 'low-signal data' outweigh its weakness of high memory usage, making it the best trade-off among available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is the most suitable model for the given dataset characteristics. It handles tabular and noisy data effectively, which aligns with the dataset tags. Although it requires high memory, the short training time and capability to handle small datasets make it a good fit for datasets with low memory requirements. The VAE's strengths in handling high dimensionality and its scalability align well with the characteristics of the dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) model is best suited for tabular data with noisy and low-signal characteristics while maintaining a requirement for low memory use. It handles noisy data effectively and is designed to work with smaller datasets, unlike most other models in the list that are less suitable for small data sizes. Although VAE typically requires high memory, given the dataset tags require low memory, VAE fits better than alternatives when taking all factors into consideration. Other potential models either struggle with small datasets, like AE1SVM and ALAD, or lack compatibility with tabular data, as is the case with models like AnoGAN." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it performs well on tabular and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset tags indicating noisy tabular data. While VAE might not be ideal for small data sizes, it handles noisy data effectively and requires low memory, which is important given the additional requirements specified. Although it needs high memory and a large dataset for optimal performance, the short training time and ability to handle low-signal data give it an edge over other models in the list under these conditions." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is chosen because it handles tabular data efficiently which matches the dataset type. VAE is also strong in dealing with noisy data, a significant characteristic of the dataset. Furthermore, it has a short training time, which aligns with the low memory requirement of the dataset despite having high memory consumption overall. Other models either struggle with tabular data, noisy data, or small dataset sizes. VAE provides the best balance of strengths for the given dataset's characteristics." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset's properties. It is strong in handling tabular data and performs well with noisy data, making it fit well with the dataset characteristics. Furthermore, the VAE model has a short training time and can accommodate large datasets, which supports the low memory requirement. Though it may struggle with discrete or categorical data, this does not conflict with the dataset tags provided. Therefore, despite being resource-intensive, it aligns better with the dataset's characteristics than other options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is most suitable because it addresses several key aspects of the dataset: it works well with tabular data, handles noisy data effectively, and supports higher dimensionality, which can help extract more detailed information even from low-signal data. Although it might typically require higher memory, its strengths in handling small datasets, short training time, and capability with noisy data make it the most aligned option for dealing with the dataset characteristics identified." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it is strong in handling tabular data, noisy data, and has a short training time, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics such as tabular, noisy data, and requirement for low memory use due to its short training time. While it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and imbalanced datasets, these do not heavily impair its performance in this scenario. This choice balances the dataset properties with the model's ability to effectively generalize on small datasets while managing noise in the data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is chosen due to its strengths in handling tabular and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It is also capable of operating with low-signal data, making it suitable despite the small dataset size. Moreover, VAE is optimized for GPU, offers short training times, and does not require high memory, matching the additional requirement of low memory usage. Although it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, these are less concerning given the compatibility with the other dataset attributes." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable as it supports tabular data and performs well with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset tags. Although it requires high memory, the strength in handling small datasets with noisy characteristics compensates for this. It also has a short training time, which is beneficial given the low memory requirement. Despite its weaknesses in dealing with discrete data or imbalanced data, these are not critical factors in this selection context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is well-suited for small tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite its need for high memory, it is the most compatible model considering the strengths relevant to tabular and noisy data while accommodating relatively low-dimensionality. Other models either struggle with small data sizes or are less effective with noisy tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE (Variational Autoencoder) is chosen because it is the most suitable model for the given dataset tags. It supports tabular data and can handle noisy data effectively, which corresponds well with the dataset's characteristics. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, the requirement for low memory is the only major challenge, but compared to alternatives, VAE is still preferable since alternatives have larger and more critical mismatches. VAE also has a short training time and is designed to work with small datasets efficiently within reasonable memory limits." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is best suited for the given dataset as it supports tabular and noisy data and is adaptable to small data sizes. While it is not explicitly optimized for low memory usage, its strengths in handling tabular data and noisy environments, as well as its capability for short training times, make it the most compatible option from the provided list. The model can process high-dimensional data, which complements the low-signal characteristic of the dataset, despite the low-memory constraint." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it handles tabular and noisy data well, which aligns with the characteristics of the dataset. It is also appropriate for low-signal data and requires low memory and short training time, which match the additional dataset requirements. Despite not being optimal for discrete or categorical data, VAE's overall compatibility with the dataset's properties makes it the most suitable choice from the list provided." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model supports tabular data and performs well with noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it has a short training time, which is beneficial given the 'low memory' requirement. While VAE is typically better for larger datasets, it is the most aligned option given the need for handling noisy, low-signal, small-sized tabular data among the available models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset's characteristics. It supports tabular data and performs well in noisy data environments, which aligns with the dataset tags. Although it requires high memory, it offers short training time, which is beneficial considering the 'low memory' requirement in comparison to the other models. Additionally, it can handle high-dimensionality data which might be useful for distinguishing low-signal features." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data and handles noisy data well, which aligns with the dataset properties. Despite requiring high memory, which is a weakness, other models from the list have incompatible weaknesses such as poor performance on small datasets or not handling low-signal data effectively. VAE's ability to work with small datasets and tabular data makes it the best fit among the available options." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is the most suitable choice given the dataset properties. It handles tabular data and noisy data effectively, which aligns well with the dataset's characteristics. Although it has a weakness with low-signal data, its overall strength with noisy and high-dimensional data, combined with its compatibility with tabular data, makes it the best fit among the options. Furthermore, its short training time and scalability are advantageous for low-memory environments, which are also requirements for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model given the dataset properties and model analyses. It is strong for tabular data, which matches the dataset type. It handles noisy data well, which is a characteristic of the dataset, and it can operate efficiently with low memory, satisfying the additional requirement. Moreover, VAE also benefits from a short training time suitable for small data sizes. Although not perfectly attuned to low-signal data, it handles the major constraints of the dataset better than other models in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE is selected because it handles tabular data well and is designed to work with noisy data, both of which are characteristics of the given dataset. Although the dataset is small, VAE compensates by being able to operate efficiently on high-dimensionality and noisy datasets which aligns well with the needs of this particular dataset. Despite the limitation on memory, VAE's strengths in handling noisy and tabular data make it a suitable choice compared to the other models which either lack support for tabular data or have significant weaknesses regarding noisy or small datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for tabular data, despite its weaknesses with small data sizes, it is capable of handling noisy data which is a characteristic of our dataset. It can operate with high memory requirements, which might not be optimal for low memory, but it offers short training times. While not perfect, it matches better than others given the strengths and weaknesses of the other models listed." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for the given dataset properties. It handles tabular and noisy data effectively, which matches the dataset characteristics. VAE's ability to deal with high-dimensionality and to use GPUs for acceleration also complements the dataset's need for handling noisy data. Although VAE may require a GPU and higher memory, it is still preferable given the requirement for a model that can handle noisy, low-signal data effectively, compared to others in the list which are not optimal for small data sizes or have weaknesses with noisy or low-signal data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable choice because it is effective with tabular data and can handle noisy data well, which aligns with the dataset properties. Even though the dataset is small, which is a weakness for VAE, other models have more significant weaknesses related to tabular data or low memory requirements. Additionally, VAE supports low memory usage better than alternatives, making it a more feasible option for this dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable option because it supports tabular data and is effective on noisy data, aligning well with the dataset's properties. While it leverages GPU and has high memory usage, its efficiency on tabular and noisy data, combined with a short training time, makes it the best candidate despite the small data size. All other models had significant weaknesses specific to either small data size, tabular data, or noisy data, making them less suitable for this dataset's constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen as the most suitable model because it supports tabular data, handles noisy data well, and has the ability to work with low-signal data while maintaining a short training time. Although it has weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and requires high memory, its strengths in handling tabular and noisy data align well with the dataset characteristics. The ability to scale to larger datasets and manage high dimensionality makes it a robust choice for this use case, particularly given the small data size requirement." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is suitable for handling small, tabular, noisy datasets, which aligns with our dataset's characteristics. It is good for tabular and noisy data, has a short training time, and can manage high dimensionality, which may help in extracting useful features from the low-signal data. Despite its requirement for high memory, it fulfills the low memory requirement better than other candidates and supports the data type without having significant weaknesses for small data as seen in alternatives such as AnoGAN or MO-GAAL." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model considering the dataset properties and model characteristics. VAE is strong in handling tabular data and noisy data, which is important given the characteristics of the dataset. Although VAE generally requires high memory, it handles noisy data effectively and supports tabular data, aligning well with the dataset's requirements. Furthermore, VAE has a short training time, which is advantageous for low-memory scenarios, making it the best compromise amongst the models available." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it supports tabular data and is effective with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. It handles small datasets well compared to the other available models, and its short training time is beneficial given the low memory requirement. While other models have strengths in specific areas, VAE's ability to handle the dataset type and characteristics makes it the most suitable choice." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen as it supports tabular data and performs well with noisy data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Despite the small data size, VAE's strength in handling noisy data and efficient training time are beneficial. The low memory requirement is not ideal for VAE, but other models have more incompatible traits for this dataset, such as handling small data sizes or having strong negative tendencies towards noisy data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is well-suited for tabular data and performs well on noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Although it may require higher memory, which is a slight mismatch with the 'low memory' requirement, it provides short training time and is capable of handling high dimensionality. VAE also supports small datasets better than many other models listed, making it the most balanced choice for this scenario despite its limitations with categorical data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and is effective with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. It also has a short training time requirement which is beneficial for handling small datasets efficiently. While it requires high memory, it is more suitable compared to other options that struggle with small or low-signal datasets, aligning better with the need for low-signal data handling." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected as it can handle tabular and noisy data while being efficient with small datasets. Despite its high memory usage, it compensates with short training times and scalability. This aligns well with the dataset's characteristics of low memory requirement and noisy, low-signal data, while avoiding severe weaknesses of other models with small datasets and tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for the dataset as it handles tabular data and noisy data well, which matches the dataset characteristics. Although it typically requires high memory, it offers short training times suitable for small datasets. VAE's ability to process high-dimensional data also aligns with potential data complexity, making it the best choice considering the limitations of other models for small, low-signal, noisy tabular datasets." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The dataset consists of small, tabular data with noise and low signal, requiring a model that can handle such characteristics efficiently under low memory constraints. VAE is strong with tabular and noisy data, suitable for handling high dimensionality and has a short training time. Its weaknesses are mostly related to discrete or categorical data and balancing issues, which are less relevant here. Thus, VAE is the most appropriate choice given its ability to deal with noisy data and tabular format within this context." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the best choice as it handles tabular and noisy data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it operates efficiently on small datasets while requiring low memory, overcoming the primary weaknesses of other models in handling small, low-signal datasets with noise. Despite the model's high memory requirement, it is most aligned with the need for handling noisy and tabular data effectively." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is a good fit for small tabular datasets with noisy data, which matches the dataset properties provided. While VAE does have weaknesses with discrete or categorical data and may require GPU and high memory, it specifically handles noisy data well and is applicable to tabular data, even though it is not inherently minimalistic in memory usage. Considering the dataset's requirement for handling noise and the taboo of small data size refuted by other options, VAE stands out as a preferred model from the provided list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is chosen because it supports tabular data and performs well with noisy data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Additionally, it is designed to work efficiently on small datasets and has a short training time. Despite its need for high memory, which is a minor mismatch, it is the best available option given the requirement for models that handle low-signal data well." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it handles tabular data well and is robust to noisy data, which aligns with the dataset properties of 'tabular data' and 'noisy data'. Despite the dataset being small, VAE is preferred because it has strengths in managing high dimensionality and noisy data efficiently, offering a good balance of suitability for the low-signal data with low memory requirements. It also has a short training time, which is beneficial in a scenario with a small dataset and low memory constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this dataset because it supports tabular data and is effective with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, it has a short training time, which is advantageous for handling small data sizes, though it requires high memory. While other models may also deal with noisy data, VAE's combination of strengths in working with tabular data and handling noise makes it a more suitable choice for this scenario compared to others in the model list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model because it handles tabular data and noisy data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Despite its weakness with small data sizes and low-signal data, it offers short training time and can be tailored with hyperparameter tuning to adapt to the data size. Additionally, while VAE typically requires high memory, its tabular data strength and short training time make it a viable choice considering the dataset's low memory requirement compared to other models." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and effectively handles noisy data, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, VAE has a short training time and is scalable to large datasets, which is beneficial for expanding beyond the current small dataset size. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, these do not impact the current dataset as no such tags were mentioned, and the model requires high memory which fits within the given low-memory constraint only for training but not runtime, making it a viable option." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this scenario due to its strength in handling tabular data, noisy data, and operating on small datasets. It also has the capability to effectively manage high dimensionality, which can be beneficial given the 'low-signal data' characteristic of the dataset. While it does require high memory, it compensates with a short training time, making it suitable for your low memory requirement. Other models either struggle with small datasets or are less ideal for tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it handles tabular data and noisy data well, which are key characteristics of the dataset. Additionally, it requires low memory and has a short training time, making it suitable for a small dataset with low-signal properties. While it has a high memory requirement in full capacity, its strengths align well with the dataset features compared to others in the list." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is suitable for small tabular datasets with noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Although VAE is not ideal for low-signal data, it handles noisy data and tabular data effectively compared to other options. It also requires low memory and has a short training time, matching the dataset's additional requirements." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The VAE model is suitable for small, tabular data with noisy and low-signal characteristics, which are key attributes of the dataset. Despite its weakness with discrete or categorical data, VAE handles tabular and noisy data well, is efficient in terms of memory and training time, making it a good fit for low-memory requirements. Other models like AnoGAN and DevNet are less suitable due to poor performance on small datasets and tabular data." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is the most suitable model for this scenario due to its strengths in handling tabular and noisy data, which aligns with the dataset characteristics. Despite its high memory requirement, it offers short training times and effectively manages high dimensionality, making it a good fit for low-signal data. Additionally, it supports scalability, which is a provision for potential dataset growth, and its strengths in managing noisy data help address noise in the current dataset." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model as it supports tabular data and performs well on noisy data, which matches the dataset characteristics. Though it has a weakness with low memory requirements, other models such as LUNAR and Deep SVDD are not suited due to their weaknesses with noisy data, a key characteristic of the dataset. VAE outperforms others in handling tabular, noisy data combined, despite the dataset's small size." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is the most suitable model for this scenario as it supports tabular data, can effectively handle noisy data, which is a characteristic of the dataset, and has a short training time that meets the low memory requirement. While the dataset is small, the ability of VAE to work with noisy data helps mitigate this issue better than other models listed, given the constraints." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it is one of the models that handles tabular data and noisy data well, which aligns with the dataset properties. Although it typically requires high memory, it has short training time and is suitable for small datasets, making it a good fit for low memory requirements when optimized properly." + }, + { + "selected_model": "VAE", + "reason": "VAE is selected because it supports tabular data and is capable of handling noisy data, which aligns well with the dataset characteristics. Despite its weaknesses with discrete or categorical data, these do not contradict the current dataset tags. Additionally, VAE is known for short training times and scalability, which can be beneficial even with the requirement for low memory usage. Other models either have more critical weaknesses relative to the dataset requirements or do not support tabular data as effectively." + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/pyod/utils/auto_model_selector.py b/pyod/utils/auto_model_selector.py new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7966135d --- /dev/null +++ b/pyod/utils/auto_model_selector.py @@ -0,0 +1,315 @@ +from openai import OpenAI +from dotenv import load_dotenv +import os +import pandas as pd +import numpy as np +from scipy.stats import kurtosis, skew +import importlib.resources +import json +import re + + +def load_model_analyses_labels_only(): + analyses = {} + model_list = [] + + resource_dir = importlib.resources.files("pyod.utils").joinpath("model_analysis_jsons") + + + for file in resource_dir.iterdir(): + if file.suffix == ".json": + model_name = file.stem + with file.open("r", encoding="utf-8") as f: + try: + analysis = json.load(f) + except json.JSONDecodeError: + print(f"Failed to decode JSON for model {model_name}") + continue + + # 处理 strengths / weaknesses + strengths = analysis.get('strengths', []) + weaknesses = analysis.get('weaknesses', []) + strengths_labels = [] + for item in strengths: + label = item.get('label') if isinstance(item, dict) else item + strengths_labels.append(label) + weaknesses_labels = [] + for item in weaknesses: + label = item.get('label') if isinstance(item, dict) else item + weaknesses_labels.append(label) + + analyses[model_name] = { + 'strengths': strengths_labels, + 'weaknesses': weaknesses_labels + } + model_list.append(model_name) + + return analyses, model_list + + +class AutoModelSelector: + def __init__(self, dataset, additional_notes='not specified', api_key=None): + """ + Initializes the AutoModelSelector with a dataset, additional notes, and an OpenAI API key. + + Parameters: + - dataset (pd.DataFrame): The dataset to analyze. + - additional_notes (str): Additional notes about the dataset. + - api_key (str): OpenAI API key. If not provided, it will be loaded from the environment variable. + """ + load_dotenv() + + # Initialize class variables + self.dataset = dataset + self.additional_notes = additional_notes + self.api_key = api_key or os.getenv("API_KEY") + self.model_info, self.model_list = load_model_analyses_labels_only() + self.selected_model = None + self.reason = None + self.gpt_response = None + + def call_gpt(self, prompt): + """ + Calls the OpenAI GPT-4o API with the provided prompt and returns the response. + + Parameters: + - prompt (str): The prompt to send to GPT-4o. + + Returns: + - response (str): The assistant's reply from GPT-4o. + """ + client = OpenAI(api_key=self.api_key) + messages = [ + {"role": "system", "content": 'You are a well-trained data scientist specifically good at machine learning.'}, + {"role": "user", "content": prompt} + ] + response = client.chat.completions.create( + model="gpt-4o", + messages=messages, + max_tokens=1000 + ).choices[0].message.content + return response + + + def analyze_and_tag_dataset(self): + """ + Analyzes the dataset and generates a prompt for GPT-4 to get standardized tags describing the dataset. + + Returns: + - prompt (str): The prompt generated based on the dataset analysis. + """ + import pandas as pd + import numpy as np + from scipy.stats import skew, kurtosis + + data = pd.DataFrame(self.dataset) + + # Step 1: Capture dataset statistics + stats = { + "shape": data.shape, + "data_type_counts": data.dtypes.value_counts().to_dict(), + "overall_missing_values_ratio": data.isnull().mean().mean().round(4), + } + + # For numeric columns, compute overall statistics + numeric_cols = data.select_dtypes(include=np.number) + if not numeric_cols.empty: + # Drop rows with any missing values in numeric columns for accurate calculations + numeric_data = numeric_cols.dropna() + + overall_mean = numeric_data.values.flatten().mean().round(4) + overall_std = numeric_data.values.flatten().std().round(4) + overall_min = numeric_data.values.flatten().min().round(4) + overall_max = numeric_data.values.flatten().max().round(4) + overall_skewness = skew(numeric_data.values.flatten()).round(4) + overall_kurtosis = kurtosis(numeric_data.values.flatten()).round(4) + + stats["overall_descriptive_stats"] = { + "mean": overall_mean, + "std_dev": overall_std, + "min": overall_min, + "max": overall_max, + "skewness": overall_skewness, + "kurtosis": overall_kurtosis + } + else: + stats["overall_descriptive_stats"] = {} + + # Step 2: Build the prompt + prompt = ( + "You are an expert in data analysis. Based on the following statistical summary of a dataset, " + "provide a list of standardized tags that best describe this dataset's properties.\n\n" + "Dataset Analysis:\n" + f"- Shape (rows, columns): {stats['shape']}\n" + f"- Data type counts: {stats['data_type_counts']}\n" + f"- Overall missing values ratio: {stats['overall_missing_values_ratio']}\n" + f"- Overall descriptive stats (numeric columns): {stats['overall_descriptive_stats']}\n" + ) + + prompt += ( + f"\nAdditional Information: {self.additional_notes}\n\n" + "Using the following categories, define appropriate tags for this dataset:\n" + "Data size: Choose from ['small', 'medium', 'large']\n" + "Data type: Choose from ['images', 'text', 'tabular data', 'time series', 'audio', 'video']\n" + "Domain: Choose from ['medical', 'finance', 'education', 'social media', 'retail', 'manufacturing', 'agriculture', 'technology', 'automotive', 'others']\n" + "Characteristics: Choose from ['noisy data', 'high dimensionality', 'sparse data', 'imbalanced data', 'real-time data', 'low-signal data']\n" + "Additional requirements: Choose from ['CPU', 'GPU', 'high memory', 'low memory']\n\n" + "Return your response in JSON format with keys corresponding to each category and list of relevant tags." + ) + + return prompt + + + def model_auto_select(self): + """ + Selects the most suitable deep learning model based on the dataset tags and model analyses. + + Returns: + - selected_model (str): The name of the selected model. + - reason (str): The reason for selecting the model. + """ + # Step 1: Analyze and tag dataset if not already done + # get data info + + max_retries = 3 + + if not hasattr(self, 'data_info'): + prompt = self.analyze_and_tag_dataset() + for attempt in range(max_retries): + data_info_response = self.call_gpt(prompt) + + try: + # Extract the section within curly braces + match = re.search(r'\{(.*?)\}', data_info_response, re.DOTALL) + if match: + data_info_response = match.group(0) + + print(data_info_response) + data_info = json.loads(data_info_response) + self.data_info = data_info # Store data_info + + break # Exit loop if successful + except json.JSONDecodeError: + print(f"Attempt {attempt + 1}/{max_retries} failed to parse data_info.") + if attempt == max_retries - 1: + print("Max retries reached. Could not parse dataset information.") + return None, None + + + + # Step 2: Load model analyses and list if not already loaded + if not hasattr(self, 'model_info') or not hasattr(self, 'model_list'): + self.model_info, self.model_list = self.load_model_analyses_labels_only() + + # Step 3: Construct the model selection prompt + if not hasattr(self, 'selection_prompt'): + selection_prompt = f""" + You are an expert in machine learning model selection. + + Based on the dataset properties and model analyses provided, recommend the most suitable model from the given model list. Only select a model from the model list. + + Dataset Tags: + {json.dumps(self.data_info, indent=4)} + + Model Analyses: + {json.dumps(self.model_info, indent=4)} + + Model List: + {json.dumps(self.model_list, indent=4)} + + Please compare the dataset tags with the strengths and weaknesses of each model, and select the most suitable model from the model list. The best model should be the maximum alignment of strengths and minimum alignment of weekness. Provide your selection in JSON format with the following keys: + - "selected_model": the name of the top-choice selected model (must be exactly one from the model list) + - "reason": a brief explanation of why this model is the best choice, considering the dataset properties and model characteristics. + + Ensure that 'selected_model' is exactly one of the model names from the model list. + """ + self.selection_prompt = selection_prompt + + for attempt in range(max_retries): + selection_response = self.call_gpt(self.selection_prompt) + try: + # Extract the section within curly braces + match = re.search(r'\{(.*?)\}', selection_response, re.DOTALL) + if match: + selection_response = match.group(0) + + selection_result = json.loads(selection_response) + selected_model = selection_result.get('selected_model') + reason = selection_result.get('reason') + + # Validate the selected model + if selected_model in self.model_list: + self.selected_model = selected_model + self.reason = reason + + break + else: + print(f"Attempt {attempt + 1}/{max_retries} failed: Model '{selected_model}' not in the model list.") + except json.JSONDecodeError: + print(f"Attempt {attempt + 1}/{max_retries} failed to parse selection response.") + if attempt == max_retries - 1: + print("Max retries reached. Could not complete model selection.") + return None, None + + print("The top model is: ", self.selected_model) + print("Reason to choose this model: ", self.reason) + + return self.selected_model, self.reason + + + + + def get_top_clf(self): + """ + Imports the library of the selected model and initializes the classifier. + + Returns: + - clf: Initialized classifier object. + """ + if self.selected_model is None: + self.selected_model, _ = self.model_auto_select() + + # Initialize the classifier based on the selected model + if self.selected_model == 'MO_GAAL': + from pyod.models.mo_gaal import MO_GAAL + clf = MO_GAAL(epoch_num=30, batch_size=32) + elif self.selected_model == 'SO_GAAL': + from pyod.models.so_gaal import SO_GAAL + clf = SO_GAAL() + elif self.selected_model == 'AutoEncoder': + from pyod.models.auto_encoder import AutoEncoder + clf = AutoEncoder() + elif self.selected_model == 'VAE': + from pyod.models.vae import VAE + clf = VAE() + elif self.selected_model == 'AnoGAN': + from pyod.models.anogan import AnoGAN + clf = AnoGAN() + elif self.selected_model == 'DeepSVDD': + from pyod.models.deep_svdd import DeepSVDD + clf = DeepSVDD() + elif self.selected_model == 'ALAD': + from pyod.models.alad import ALAD + clf = ALAD() + elif self.selected_model == 'AE1SVM': + from pyod.models.ae1svm import AE1SVM + clf = AE1SVM() + elif self.selected_model == 'DevNet': + from pyod.models.devnet import DevNet + clf = DevNet() + elif self.selected_model == 'RGraph': + from pyod.models.rgraph import RGraph + clf = RGraph() + elif self.selected_model == 'LUNAR': + from pyod.models.lunar import LUNAR + clf = LUNAR() + else: + # Default to AutoEncoder if model not recognized + from pyod.models.auto_encoder import AutoEncoder + clf = AutoEncoder() + + return clf + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/AE1SVM.json b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/AE1SVM.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bec75d41 --- /dev/null +++ b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/AE1SVM.json @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +{ + "strengths": [ + + { + "label": "high dimensionality", + "explanation": "The use of Autoencoders for dimensionality reduction and random Fourier features for kernel approximation makes the model suitable for high-dimensional data." + }, + { + "label": "sparse data", + "explanation": "The model's architecture can effectively compress sparse features using the Autoencoder, improving anomaly detection performance." + }, + { + "label": "imbalanced data", + "explanation": "One-Class SVM inherently focuses on learning the structure of 'normal' data, making it well-suited for datasets where anomalies are rare." + }, + { + "label": "tabular data", + "explanation": "The model's design is particularly suited to tabular data, where high dimensionality and sparsity often occur." + }, + { + "label": "images", + "explanation": "The deep structure of the Autoencoder enables the model to capture complex patterns in image data, aiding anomaly detection." + }, + { + "label": "medical", + "explanation": "High-dimensional and imbalanced datasets in medical domains align well with the model's strengths." + }, + { + "label": "finance", + "explanation": "The model is effective for high-dimensional financial datasets with sparse anomalies, such as fraud detection." + }, + { + "label": "technology", + "explanation": "Anomaly detection in technological systems benefits from the model's scalability and handling of high-dimensional data." + }, + { + "label": "manufacturing", + "explanation": "Detecting anomalies in manufacturing data, which can be sparse or imbalanced, aligns well with the model's capabilities." + }, + { + "label": "GPU", + "explanation": "The computational demands of Autoencoder training and Fourier feature transformation are well-supported by GPUs." + }, + { + "label": "high memory", + "explanation": "Processing high-dimensional data and storing Fourier features requires substantial memory resources." + }, + { + "label": "short training time", + "explanation": "Efficient optimization and end-to-end training reduce the time required to train the model on large datasets." + }, + { + "label": "scalable to large datasets", + "explanation": "The architecture and use of Fourier features allow scalability to large datasets without sacrificing efficiency." + } + ], + "weaknesses": [ + { + "label": "small data size", + "explanation": "The model's complexity and resource requirements make it inefficient for small datasets, where simpler models would suffice." + }, + { + "label": "noisy data", + "explanation": "The Autoencoder and SVM combination may overfit to noise, particularly in highly noisy datasets." + }, + { + "label": "real-time data", + "explanation": "The computational cost of Fourier feature transformation and training limits the model's application in real-time scenarios." + }, + { + "label": "long training time", + "explanation": "Although scalable, the model's reliance on Fourier features and Autoencoder optimization increases training time for large, complex datasets." + }, + { + "label": "CPU", + "explanation": "Training the model on CPUs can be significantly slower due to its computational demands." + }, + { + "label": "low memory", + "explanation": "The model's reliance on high-dimensional data processing and Fourier features makes it unsuitable for environments with low memory resources." + }, + { + "label": "simple, linear patterns", + "explanation": "For datasets with linearly separable patterns, the model's complexity is unnecessary and could lead to overfitting." + } + ] +} diff --git a/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/ALAD.json b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/ALAD.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..206e2b54 --- /dev/null +++ b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/ALAD.json @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +{ + "strengths": [ + + { + "label": "tabular data", + "explanation": "ALAD's ability to handle high-dimensional and noisy data makes it suitable for tabular datasets often found in domains like finance or healthcare." + }, + { + "label": "images", + "explanation": "The GAN-based structure, combined with spectral normalization and cycle-consistency, supports anomaly detection in image data, particularly for identifying subtle anomalies." + }, + { + "label": "cybersecurity", + "explanation": "The model's robust anomaly detection capabilities are highly relevant for cybersecurity applications, where detecting subtle irregularities is critical." + }, + { + "label": "finance", + "explanation": "The model's handling of imbalanced and high-dimensional datasets aligns with financial applications such as fraud detection." + }, + { + "label": "technology", + "explanation": "Its flexibility and robustness in identifying anomalies make it applicable in technology domains, such as sensor data analysis." + }, + { + "label": "high dimensionality", + "explanation": "ALAD is explicitly designed to excel in high-dimensional datasets, a common characteristic in domains like cybersecurity, healthcare, and finance." + }, + { + "label": "noisy data", + "explanation": "The incorporation of cycle-consistency and spectral normalization enables it to handle noisy datasets effectively." + }, + { + "label": "sparse data", + "explanation": "The reconstruction-based scoring mechanism allows ALAD to identify anomalies even in sparse datasets where traditional methods may struggle." + }, + { + "label": "GPU", + "explanation": "The model requires GPU resources for efficient training and inference, making it suitable for environments with access to such resources." + }, + { + "label": "high memory", + "explanation": "Handling high-dimensional data and maintaining cycle-consistency require substantial memory resources." + }, + { + "label": "scalable to large datasets", + "explanation": "ALAD's architecture is scalable, allowing it to process and model large datasets effectively." + } + ], + "weaknesses": [ + { + "label": "small data size", + "explanation": "The model struggles with small datasets, where its complex architecture may lead to overfitting or inefficient use of resources." + }, + { + "label": "time series", + "explanation": "The architecture is not optimized for time-series data, where sequential patterns are more relevant than static feature-space anomalies." + }, + { + "label": "audio", + "explanation": "ALAD is not explicitly designed for audio data, requiring additional preprocessing or adaptations for effective use in this domain." + }, + { + "label": "video", + "explanation": "The model lacks native support for video data, which requires specialized architectures to capture temporal and spatial patterns." + }, + { + "label": "real-time data", + "explanation": "ALAD's training and inference times may not meet the requirements of real-time applications, limiting its use in such scenarios." + }, + { + "label": "low-signal data", + "explanation": "Datasets with minimal signal-to-noise ratio may not provide enough information for ALAD's complex architecture to detect anomalies effectively." + }, + { + "label": "CPU", + "explanation": "The model's reliance on GPU resources makes it inefficient for environments limited to CPU-based computation." + }, + { + "label": "long training time", + "explanation": "The inclusion of cycle-consistency, spectral normalization, and multiple discriminators leads to prolonged training times." + }, + { + "label": "not scalable", + "explanation": "Although the model scales well to large datasets, its complexity may make it less practical for applications requiring quick scaling to extremely large or distributed datasets without significant resources." + } + ] +} diff --git a/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/AnoGAN.json b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/AnoGAN.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..77b8a602 --- /dev/null +++ b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/AnoGAN.json @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +{ + "strengths": [ + + { + "label": "images", + "explanation": "AnoGAN is specifically designed for image data, particularly in the context of medical imaging, making it ideal for tasks like anomaly detection in retinal scans." + }, + { + "label": "medical", + "explanation": "Its capability to detect pixel-level anomalies makes it particularly suitable for medical fields where precise anomaly detection is critical, such as ophthalmology." + }, + { + "label": "high dimensionality", + "explanation": "The model is tailored for high-dimensional data, such as high-resolution medical images, leveraging GANs to learn the complex data manifold." + }, + { + "label": "noisy data", + "explanation": "AnoGAN's robust training process allows it to handle noise in the data, which is common in medical imaging due to variability in scanning conditions." + }, + { + "label": "GPU", + "explanation": "The model requires GPU acceleration to handle the computational demands of GAN training and high-dimensional image processing." + }, + { + "label": "scalable to large datasets", + "explanation": "AnoGAN's design allows it to be scaled to large datasets, which is beneficial for training on extensive medical image repositories." + } + ], + "weaknesses": [ + { + "label": "small data size", + "explanation": "AnoGAN is not well-suited for small datasets, as GANs generally require a large amount of data to effectively learn the underlying distribution." + }, + { + "label": "text", + "explanation": "The model is specifically designed for image data and is not applicable to text data or other non-visual modalities." + }, + { + "label": "tabular data", + "explanation": "AnoGAN is not optimized for structured tabular datasets, which require different preprocessing and modeling approaches." + }, + { + "label": "imbalanced data", + "explanation": "AnoGAN may struggle with imbalanced datasets, as GANs require sufficient representation of all data classes to perform effectively." + }, + { + "label": "real-time data", + "explanation": "Due to its computational complexity and need for GPU resources, AnoGAN is not suitable for real-time anomaly detection scenarios." + }, + { + "label": "low memory", + "explanation": "The model's high memory requirements make it unsuitable for environments with limited computational resources." + }, + { + "label": "long training time", + "explanation": "The model requires a long training time, which can be a limitation for applications requiring rapid model deployment or iteration." + }, + { + "label": "not scalable", + "explanation": "While scalable to large datasets, the model's computational and memory requirements limit its scalability in low-resource environments." + } + ] +} diff --git a/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/AutoEncoder.json b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/AutoEncoder.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3ffeabae --- /dev/null +++ b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/AutoEncoder.json @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +{ + "strengths": [ + + { + "label": "images", + "explanation": "Their ability to capture complex, nonlinear relationships makes autoencoders particularly effective for image data, especially for denoising or compressing high-dimensional visual representations." + }, + { + "label": "tabular data", + "explanation": "They are highly effective for structured data, such as tabular data, especially in dimensionality reduction and anomaly detection tasks." + }, + { + "label": "healthcare", + "explanation": "Autoencoders are commonly used in healthcare for tasks like anomaly detection in medical imaging or compressing high-dimensional genomic data." + }, + { + "label": "technology", + "explanation": "In technology, they are used for feature learning, anomaly detection in network security, and other high-dimensional data tasks." + }, + { + "label": "finance", + "explanation": "Their ability to detect outliers makes them valuable for fraud detection and risk analysis in financial data." + }, + { + "label": "high dimensionality", + "explanation": "Autoencoders excel in reducing high-dimensional data into compact latent representations, often outperforming traditional methods like PCA." + }, + { + "label": "noisy data", + "explanation": "With the ability to reconstruct inputs, autoencoders are effective at handling noisy data, as the latent space learns the dominant structures while ignoring noise." + }, + { + "label": "GPU", + "explanation": "Deep autoencoder architectures require significant computational power, which is best supported by GPUs for efficient training." + }, + { + "label": "high memory", + "explanation": "The model’s architecture and the need for storing intermediate representations necessitate high memory usage, especially for large datasets." + }, + { + "label": "short training time", + "explanation": "Compared to other deep learning models, autoencoders often require less time to train due to their focused task of reconstruction rather than complex predictions." + }, + { + "label": "scalable to large datasets", + "explanation": "Their architecture and optimization strategies enable them to scale effectively, making them applicable for large-scale data analysis tasks." + } + ], + "weaknesses": [ + { + "label": "small data size", + "explanation": "Autoencoders generally require a sufficient amount of data to learn meaningful latent representations and are less effective with small datasets." + }, + { + "label": "audio", + "explanation": "Autoencoders may struggle with sequential or highly complex audio signals, where specialized models like RNNs or transformers are more suitable." + }, + { + "label": "video", + "explanation": "While possible, handling video data often requires spatiotemporal feature extraction, which is not a primary strength of standard autoencoder architectures." + }, + { + "label": "real-time data", + "explanation": "Autoencoders are not inherently optimized for real-time processing, as their training and inference times can be limiting factors." + }, + { + "label": "imbalanced data", + "explanation": "They may struggle with heavily imbalanced datasets, as reconstruction error might not always reliably highlight anomalies in rare classes." + }, + { + "label": "low-signal data", + "explanation": "In datasets with very subtle patterns, the latent space learned by autoencoders may fail to capture meaningful representations, leading to poor performance." + }, + { + "label": "CPU", + "explanation": "Training deep autoencoder architectures on CPUs can be prohibitively slow and computationally expensive." + } + ] +} diff --git a/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/Deep SVDD.json b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/Deep SVDD.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..38d74f80 --- /dev/null +++ b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/Deep SVDD.json @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +{ + "strengths": [ + + { + "label": "images", + "explanation": "DeepSVDD has shown competitive performance on image datasets like MNIST and CIFAR-10, making it well-suited for anomaly detection in image data." + }, + { + "label": "high dimensionality", + "explanation": "The model's use of deep neural networks allows it to effectively handle high-dimensional data by learning compact representations in a hypersphere." + }, + { + "label": "cybersecurity", + "explanation": "Detecting anomalies aligns well with use cases in cybersecurity, such as intrusion detection or unusual behavior identification." + }, + { + "label": "healthcare", + "explanation": "The model's ability to detect anomalies is useful in identifying irregular patterns in medical imaging or health monitoring data." + }, + { + "label": "technology", + "explanation": "Technology applications benefit from its general-purpose anomaly detection in systems monitoring or performance analysis." + }, + { + "label": "GPU", + "explanation": "The model requires GPU resources, which are optimal for training deep neural networks on large datasets." + }, + { + "label": "scalable to large datasets", + "explanation": "The model can scale effectively to large datasets due to its neural network design and the ability to optimize efficiently in high dimensions." + } + ], + "weaknesses": [ + { + "label": "noisy data", + "explanation": "While DeepSVDD performs well on structured data, it struggles with noisy datasets where anomalies are not clearly separable from normal data." + }, + { + "label": "imbalanced data", + "explanation": "The model's performance declines with imbalanced datasets as it is not explicitly designed to handle significant class disparities." + }, + { + "label": "long training time", + "explanation": "The optimization process for minimizing the hypersphere volume can be computationally expensive, leading to extended training times." + }, + { + "label": "high memory", + "explanation": "The model's reliance on GPU and its large memory requirements can be a bottleneck for users with limited hardware resources." + }, + { + "label": "trial-and-error hyperparameter tuning", + "explanation": "The model requires significant effort in hyperparameter tuning to achieve optimal results, which can be time-consuming and complex." + }, + { + "label": "sparse data", + "explanation": "DeepSVDD is less effective with sparse datasets, as its reliance on neural network representations requires dense and structured inputs." + } + ] +} diff --git a/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/DevNet.json b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/DevNet.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..df05c2a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/DevNet.json @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +{ + "strengths": [ + + { + "label": "text", + "explanation": "Text data anomalies, especially in cybersecurity or finance, can be effectively identified due to the model's ability to work on sparse and high-dimensional data." + }, + { + "label": "finance", + "explanation": "In fields like finance, where anomalies often represent fraudulent transactions, the model's ability to optimize anomaly scores directly is highly advantageous." + }, + { + "label": "cybersecurity", + "explanation": "The model's strength in detecting clear outliers makes it a good fit for anomaly detection in cybersecurity, where distinct attacks are sought among benign activities." + }, + { + "label": "noisy data", + "explanation": "DevNet can work well with noisy datasets by leveraging its deviation loss to amplify meaningful differences between anomalies and normal data." + }, + { + "label": "GPU", + "explanation": "The model's training process benefits from GPU acceleration, especially when handling large datasets or deep architectures like DevNetD." + }, + { + "label": "short training time", + "explanation": "The model is designed to train efficiently, making it suitable for iterative processes or real-world applications with quick turnaround requirements." + }, + { + "label": "scalable to large datasets", + "explanation": "Despite its flexibility, DevNet can scale well to larger datasets due to its efficient architecture and targeted optimization for anomaly detection." + } + ], + "weaknesses": [ + { + "label": "small dataset", + "explanation": "Deep configurations, such as DevNetD, are prone to overfitting on small datasets with limited diversity, which reduces their generalizability." + }, + { + "label": "images", + "explanation": "While DevNet can technically handle image data, its architecture lacks the specialized feature extraction capabilities of convolutional layers, which are better suited for image-based anomaly detection." + }, + { + "label": "time series", + "explanation": "The model's architecture is not optimized for sequential dependencies, which makes it less suitable for time series anomaly detection compared to models like RNNs or Transformers." + }, + { + "label": "audio", + "explanation": "The model lacks specific feature extraction capabilities tailored to audio data, making it less effective for detecting anomalies in sound patterns." + }, + { + "label": "low-signal data", + "explanation": "Datasets where anomalies have only subtle differences from inliers may not perform well due to the reliance on distinct deviation patterns." + }, + { + "label": "high memory", + "explanation": "Training deeper architectures like DevNetD requires significant memory resources, which can be a bottleneck for large-scale or resource-constrained environments." + }, + { + "label": "long training time", + "explanation": "While the shallow configurations are quick, deep versions may require longer training times due to additional layers and computational demands." + }, + { + "label": "not scalable", + "explanation": "The computational cost of deep architectures may limit scalability on extremely large datasets or resource-limited settings." + } + ] + } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/LUNAR.json b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/LUNAR.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9ab4a939 --- /dev/null +++ b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/LUNAR.json @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +{ + "strengths": [ + + { + "label": "tabular data", + "explanation": "LUNAR's local outlier detection methods make it well-suited for structured tabular data, capturing outliers based on nearest neighbor relationships." + }, + { + "label": "unstructured data", + "explanation": "Its graph neural network architecture enables LUNAR to handle unstructured data by modeling relationships between data points." + }, + { + "label": "finance", + "explanation": "In the finance domain, where detecting fraudulent activities often involves structured data with local outliers, LUNAR excels." + }, + { + "label": "cybersecurity", + "explanation": "LUNAR's ability to model local data structures is advantageous for detecting anomalies in cybersecurity data, such as network traffic." + }, + { + "label": "low-dimensional datasets", + "explanation": "LUNAR is effective on low-dimensional datasets, as it leverages local neighborhood information to detect anomalies, a strategy that performs well in such data spaces." + }, + { + "label": "unstructured feature datasets", + "explanation": "LUNAR excels with unstructured feature datasets by utilizing graph neural networks to model complex relationships, enabling effective anomaly detection without relying on predefined structures." + } + , + { + "label": "sparse data", + "explanation": "LUNAR is effective on sparse datasets due to its ability to aggregate information dynamically across local neighborhoods." + }, + { + "label": "imbalanced data", + "explanation": "The model's negative sampling approach helps it train effectively even on imbalanced datasets by simulating diverse outlier types." + }, + { + "label": "GPU", + "explanation": "The model relies on GPU acceleration to handle computationally intensive processes, such as nearest neighbor searches and graph neural network operations." + }, + { + "label": "short training time", + "explanation": "Despite its complexity, LUNAR achieves efficient training through its well-optimized architecture and sampling strategies." + }, + { + "label": "scalable to large datasets", + "explanation": "The model's graph-based approach and efficient sampling strategies make it scalable to large datasets." + } + ], + "weaknesses": [ + { + "label": "images", + "explanation": "The model is not designed for image data, as it lacks the convolutional layers needed to capture spatial patterns." + }, + { + "label": "time series", + "explanation": "LUNAR does not explicitly account for temporal dependencies, making it less effective for time-series anomaly detection compared to sequence-based models." + }, + { + "label": "audio", + "explanation": "The model lacks specific preprocessing or architectural components to handle audio data effectively." + }, + { + "label": "noisy data", + "explanation": "While robust to sparse data, LUNAR may struggle with datasets where noise significantly disrupts local neighborhood relationships." + }, + { + "label": "high memory", + "explanation": "The reliance on graph-based computations and large neural networks requires significant memory resources." + }, + { + "label": "hyperparameter sensitivity", + "explanation": "The model's performance is sensitive to hyperparameters, such as the number of neighbors and sampling proportions, requiring fine-tuning for optimal results." + }, + { + "label": "computationally intensive", + "explanation": "The graph neural network operations and nearest neighbor searches make LUNAR computationally expensive, particularly for large datasets." + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/MO-GAAL.json b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/MO-GAAL.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..462da94c --- /dev/null +++ b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/MO-GAAL.json @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +{ + "strengths": [ + { + "label": "medical", + "explanation": "In the medical domain, where data often has high dimensionality and imbalance, MO-GAAL can detect rare but critical anomalies." + }, + { + "label": "finance", + "explanation": "MO-GAAL is suitable for financial datasets, which often involve complex, high-dimensional data with sparse anomalies." + }, + { + "label": "technology", + "explanation": "Technology datasets benefit from MO-GAAL's ability to handle sparse, high-dimensional data with potential real-time requirements." + }, + { + "label": "sparse data", + "explanation": "MO-GAAL is designed to manage sparse datasets by leveraging its generator diversity to explore the data space more comprehensively." + }, + { + "label": "imbalanced data", + "explanation": "The model's outlier-focused learning framework is highly suitable for datasets with significant class imbalance." + }, + { + "label": "real-time data", + "explanation": "Its ability to dynamically generate outliers allows MO-GAAL to adapt to real-time data scenarios where anomalies may evolve." + }, + { + "label": "GPU", + "explanation": "MO-GAAL requires GPUs for efficient training due to its computationally intensive multi-generator GAN framework." + }, + { + "label": "high memory", + "explanation": "The model's architecture requires high memory for storing and processing multiple generators and large datasets." + }, + { + "label": "scalable to large datasets", + "explanation": "The multi-generator setup makes MO-GAAL scalable to large datasets, as it can handle diverse patterns and high-dimensional data." + } + ], + "weaknesses": [ + { + "label": "long training time", + "explanation": "The model's training involves multiple GANs, which significantly increases computational expense and training time." + }, + { + "label": "not scalable", + "explanation": "While scalable to large datasets, MO-GAAL may not scale efficiently for very large datasets without substantial computational resources." + }, + { + "label": "low memory", + "explanation": "Low memory environments are unsuitable due to the model's high computational and storage requirements." + }, + { + "label": "noisy data", + "explanation": "MO-GAAL may struggle in extremely noisy datasets where outlier boundaries are difficult to distinguish, requiring fine-tuned hyperparameters." + }, + { + "label": "interpretability", + "explanation": "As a deep learning model, MO-GAAL lacks interpretability, which could be a limitation in fields like healthcare or finance that require model transparency." + }, + { + "label": "small dataset", + "explanation": "The model is overkill for small datasets where simpler methods may provide faster and more interpretable results." + } + ] + } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/SO-GAAL.json b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/SO-GAAL.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3bf6501f --- /dev/null +++ b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/SO-GAAL.json @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +{ + "strengths": [ + + { + "label": "images", + "explanation": "The GAN architecture enables SO-GAAL to generate synthetic outliers for image data, which can help in anomaly detection tasks such as defect identification." + }, + { + "label": "finance", + "explanation": "The model's ability to detect rare outliers makes it suitable for fraud detection or anomaly detection in financial transactions." + }, + { + "label": "high dimensionality", + "explanation": "The model's use of deep neural networks allows it to effectively handle high-dimensional data by learning compact representations in a hypersphere." + }, + { + "label": "sparse data", + "explanation": "The GAN-based setup allows the model to learn boundaries even with sparse data, as it dynamically generates synthetic outliers to challenge the discriminator." + }, + { + "label": "imbalanced data", + "explanation": "The model is particularly adept at handling imbalanced datasets, where outliers are rare and normal instances dominate." + }, + { + "label": "GPU", + "explanation": "The model benefits from GPU acceleration, which speeds up the training process, especially for generating and evaluating synthetic outliers." + }, + { + "label": "short training time", + "explanation": "The model converges quickly due to its single-objective GAN structure, making it efficient for quick anomaly detection tasks." + } + ], + "weaknesses": [ + { + "label": "time series", + "explanation": "The model lacks mechanisms for capturing temporal dependencies, making it unsuitable for time-series anomaly detection tasks." + }, + { + "label": "real-time data", + "explanation": "SO-GAAL is not optimized for real-time anomaly detection due to its iterative training process, which can introduce latency." + }, + { + "label": "noisy data", + "explanation": "The model may struggle with noisy data, as noise can mislead the generator and discriminator, affecting the decision boundaries." + }, + { + "label": "small dataset (<500)", + "explanation": "SO-GAAL is susceptible to mode collapse, where the generator produces overly similar synthetic outliers, limiting the model's effectiveness in detecting diverse anomalies." + }, + { + "label": "limited scalability", + "explanation": "The model's reliance on a single generator-discriminator pair restricts its ability to scale effectively to larger datasets or handle datasets with extensive variability." + }, + { + "label": "minor distinctions", + "explanation": "SO-GAAL may struggle to detect outliers when the distinctions between normal and abnormal data are subtle or involve complex relationships." + } + ] + } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/VAE.json b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/VAE.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..db3d971a --- /dev/null +++ b/pyod/utils/model_analysis_jsons/VAE.json @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +{ + "strengths": [ + + { + "label": "images", + "explanation": "The model's ability to reconstruct high-dimensional and noisy image data makes it well-suited for tasks like denoising and inpainting." + }, + { + "label": "tabular data", + "explanation": "VAEs can handle high-dimensional tabular data, especially when noise or missing data is present, by learning latent representations." + }, + { + "label": "healthcare", + "explanation": "VAEs are beneficial in healthcare for tasks like imaging analysis, anomaly detection, and data compression where high-dimensionality and noise are common." + }, + { + "label": "technology", + "explanation": "Applications in generative modeling and data compression in technology domains make VAEs a valuable tool for handling large, noisy datasets." + }, + { + "label": "education", + "explanation": "The model's dimensionality reduction capabilities are valuable for analyzing large educational datasets with latent patterns." + }, + { + "label": "high dimensionality", + "explanation": "VAEs are specifically designed to capture and compress high-dimensional data into structured latent spaces." + }, + { + "label": "noisy data", + "explanation": "The reconstruction loss and latent space regularization allow VAEs to effectively learn underlying patterns in noisy datasets." + }, + { + "label": "GPU", + "explanation": "The computational requirements for training VAEs are optimized with GPUs, especially for gradient-based optimizations in high-dimensional spaces." + }, + { + "label": "high memory", + "explanation": "Training VAEs on high-dimensional data requires significant memory for storing intermediate computations and latent representations." + }, + { + "label": "short training time", + "explanation": "VAEs generally converge quickly compared to other generative models like GANs, provided appropriate hyperparameter tuning." + }, + { + "label": "large datasets", + "explanation": "The model's architecture and gradient-based training are inherently scalable, allowing it to perform well on large datasets." + } + ], + "weaknesses": [ + { + "label": "discrete or categorical data", + "explanation": "VAEs struggle with datasets that are not preprocessed into a continuous form, as the reconstruction loss assumes continuous distributions." + }, + { + "label": "imbalanced data", + "explanation": "Imbalanced datasets can lead to biased latent representations, as the model prioritizes reconstruction of majority classes." + }, + { + "label": "real-time data", + "explanation": "VAEs are not optimized for real-time training and inference due to their computational complexity and high memory requirements." + }, + { + "label": "sparse data", + "explanation": "While VAEs can handle high-dimensional data, sparse datasets may require additional preprocessing to avoid poor latent space representation." + }, + { + "label": "CPU", + "explanation": "Training a VAE on a CPU is computationally expensive and inefficient compared to leveraging GPUs." + }, + { + "label": "poorly tuned hyperparameters", + "explanation": "The performance of VAEs is sensitive to hyperparameter choices, such as the beta coefficient, requiring careful tuning to balance reconstruction and regularization." + } + ] + } + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py index 82a59504..f7ecd17a 100644 --- a/setup.py +++ b/setup.py @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ def readme(): 'data mining', 'neural networks'], packages=find_packages(exclude=['test']), include_package_data=True, + package_data={ + 'pyod.utils.model_analysis_jsons': ['*.json'], + }, install_requires=requirements, setup_requires=['setuptools>=38.6.0'], classifiers=[