You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for releasing the code. When reproducing SARE results, I am able to reproduce the results in your paper when I use the dot product based code, but not the original Euclidean distance. Are the results in your work based on the code for the dot product?
For sare_joint the difference between the Euclidean distance and the dot product is about 15% for R@1, for both Pitts250k and Tokyo 24/7, which seems very high to me. Did you experience this as well?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for releasing the code. When reproducing SARE results, I am able to reproduce the results in your paper when I use the dot product based code, but not the original Euclidean distance. Are the results in your work based on the code for the dot product?
For sare_joint the difference between the Euclidean distance and the dot product is about 15% for R@1, for both Pitts250k and Tokyo 24/7, which seems very high to me. Did you experience this as well?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: