Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

type "voltage_range" unnecessary #51

Open
untzag opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

type "voltage_range" unnecessary #51

untzag opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@untzag
Copy link
Member

untzag commented Dec 18, 2023

The type "voltage_range" doesn't need to be a defined type, since it's just an array, as far as I know. Why don't use just use an array?

@untzag
Copy link
Member Author

untzag commented Dec 18, 2023

This was brought to my attention by yaq-project/yaq-fyi#94

@ksunden
Copy link
Member

ksunden commented Dec 18, 2023

In general I think having a shorthand name for a type is not bad... however, avro only supports named types for records, fixed length, and enum types. And this is none of those.

https://avro.apache.org/docs/1.11.1/specification/#names

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants