Proposal: remove support for emitChange payloads in BaseStore

[mridgway]

Payloads being emitted from emitChange can cause issues where state is actually being emitted rather than letting the store be used as the source of truth. This is problematic because a component may not be set up to listen to a store when it emits the event, then after it has missed the event it renders based on the state of the store.

In short, this prevents imperative view changes based on events and forces developers to use the store state instead.

This would be a major breaking change for people that use these payloads. I'd be curious to hear use cases where they are being used for something that could not be done using store state.

Code that allows this: https://github.com/yahoo/fluxible/blob/master/packages/dispatchr/addons/BaseStore.js#L72

[mridgway]

Example:

module.exports = createStore({
    storeName: 'TestStore',
    statics: {
        handlers: {
            'FOO_OPENED': (payload) => {
                this.emitChange({
                    fooHappened: true
                });
            }
        }
    }
});

[armandabric]

I didn't know we can do this. And now I think about it I do not find a case where this could be useful. So I'm in favor you're proposal.

[ali1k]

I wasn't aware of it either! It sounds like a good decision to disallow this!

[pizzarob]

I think this is useful for listening for successful requests made from the Fetchr plugin, because there is no really good way to verify a successful response from Fetchr without creating a whole new store for request statuses. For example I want to redirect when I add a new category to my database and then store. Once the category is added to the store I want to listen for success and then redirect based on that. The store is still the source of truth when it comes to the data, but when I get a successful response I know to redirect and then forget about it.