You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not sure this will ever actually be an issue in practice, but right now the bessel function interpolator is constructed using a point at x =0 (were we have j_\ell(x)) when \eta = \eta_final.
At least for the polarization source function, there is a problem because j_2(x)/x^2 |x=0 is not zero, but the way the source function integration is done is by calling the bessel interpolator at x=0 and then multiplying it into the source function.
I caught a NaN in the source function for x=0, but the bessel interpolator returning j_2(0)=0 will still be wrong.
This might be solved by the new Bessel integration?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not sure this will ever actually be an issue in practice, but right now the bessel function interpolator is constructed using a point at x =0 (were we have j_\ell(x)) when \eta = \eta_final.
At least for the polarization source function, there is a problem because j_2(x)/x^2 |x=0 is not zero, but the way the source function integration is done is by calling the bessel interpolator at x=0 and then multiplying it into the source function.
I caught a NaN in the source function for x=0, but the bessel interpolator returning j_2(0)=0 will still be wrong.
This might be solved by the new Bessel integration?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: