You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thank you for sharing the code and brilliant works. I have 3 questions as stated in the title.
Why is Log-Rank method linked to DetectGPT? I don't think DetectGPT uses any rank information. It is more inclined to the probability method.
How do you do the zero-shot detection for ChatGPT-turbo and same kind? They don't have scoring function for those zero-shot methods. What is the scoring model here?
Why do you use F1 score? because we don't have good balance between positive and negative samples?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For Q1: Log-Rank is a baseline in DetectGPT's paper.
For Q2 & Q3: we do not do zero-shot detection based on metrics. For metric-based methods, we train an extra classifier to map the metric into classes (e.g., HWTs and MGTs). With this classifier, we can transfer the detection method to other datasets.
Hi, thank you for sharing the code and brilliant works. I have 3 questions as stated in the title.
Why is Log-Rank method linked to DetectGPT? I don't think DetectGPT uses any rank information. It is more inclined to the probability method.
How do you do the zero-shot detection for ChatGPT-turbo and same kind? They don't have scoring function for those zero-shot methods. What is the scoring model here?
Why do you use F1 score? because we don't have good balance between positive and negative samples?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: