The implementation is split into two parts:
The plumber, wrapping low-level storage/database access to the database in verbose commands, and the porcelain, providing a pretty interface to it.
Underlying implementation - plumbing
Provides commands such as:
- add -> add a new task
- modify -> modify task metadata
- prune -> delete tasks with status:deleted permanently
- get -> gets a property of the first task matching the filter
To speed up development, I am considering tasklite under the hood for now rather than developing my own plumbing tool.
Additional relevant commands:
- runsql -> providing low-level access
Since I am currently running taskwarrior, this might also be a good foundation. It is also more tolerant about custom properties than Tasklite.
It has worse performance and some shortcomings, but these can mostly be addressed by the porcelain layer. A weak point however is that access isn't as powerful as with SQL, e.g. listing all subtasks of a parent can't be done as easily.
My own idea for a plumber, conceptually minimal without any convenient shortcuts or configuration - just basic commands to modify and read the database.
Maybe prefix internal values (ulid and state) with underscore. Does no interpretation of parameters, only storage.
The task manager - porcelain
Name ideas: Taskforc/Tafo
Basically a parser & visualizer with a few quirks.
Unknown commands are passed on to the plumber with potential parameter modifications.
Reports & parameter configurations should support some kind of inheritance, i.e. allowing to create a new property/report that initially uses all values from its ancestor.
Automatically generates short user-ids for new tasks based on description - first initials, then following letters in case of collisions (e.g. "al" for "Arch Linux setup"), length may depend on whether there is a parent (root tasks get single letter if possible) unless a user-id is explicitly set.
Most commands are specified in a default config file, and even most standard commands are aliases:
- delete=modify status:deleted
- do/done=modify status:done
- log=add status:done
- addx=add status:frozen name tbd; this is an important concept: such tasks cannot be completed, so they can denote categories (e.g. home, work) or activities (e.g. play piano, go outside) which can turn a task manager into a time manager
This allows the user to define and redefine the commands without any programming. It provides insights into existing inner workings and makes sure that internals are accessible for power use.
These commands need to be hardcoded, they can't be specified as simple aliases:
- add=add parent:id
- cd =selects a specific task - all further commands will be executed on this task and its children rather than all tasks
Special cases:..
to select the parent- special values prefixed with underscore e.g.
_archive
,_backlog
,_waiting
-> if they can be auto-generated they can also replace taskwarrior contexts!
The parameters for commands are pre-parsed separately, which allows custom simplified syntax. A separate config file specifies the properties with allowed values and potential shorthands, e.g.
[property]
scheduled.name=Scheduled
scheduled.label=Sched.
scheduled.type=date
sched=scheduled
size.name=Size
size.values=-,s,m,l
s=size
[tag]
big=size:l
- name is for display in detailed info (Default: property identifier with first letter uppercased)
- label is used as column header for reports - default: name
- type is used to potentially parse and translate the value - default: text (e.g. a date type will transform "5:00" to add the current date or even translate it to a timestamp - maybe even use the
date
command here?) - values can define allowed values
State values: waiting, open, frozen, repeat, done, deleted (could partially be implemented with tags?)
It is hard to get repeating tasks right. Every task manager I have seen so far implements it differently, and most task managers lack support for different use-cases.
So instead of a rigorous system, I want it to be flexible. Every property with the date type will use recurrence, as long as the state of the task is set to repeat
and the value of the property is set relatively (e.g. 2d
rather than 2020-08-24
). For that to work, the input needs to work a bit differently from the output: The date value that is displayed in reports and the like is always absolute, so it needs an internal, calculated value, while the original value has to be retained even if a task is not repeating, since it might later be set to repeat.
As in Todoist, appending a bang to the relative value will make the recur relative to the creation of the task, rather than the previous value of this property.
The task managers I have seen so far assign some kind of common id to all instances of recurring tasks. I don't really see the point here - why not simply update the values of the current task rather than marking it done and creating a new one? The case where I want to modify a single occurrence in an incompatible way seems really rare.
Let's take the case of a weekly event that is moved by an hour once. It would be defined like this:
sched!moT18 due!moT18
If scheduled
and due
are equal, the item is treated as an appointment. The T
in between separates date and time. state:repeat
is implied by the bangs inbetween, unless you explicitly instantiate it as frozen.
I can now modify this task once:
due:T19
Which only updates the date of this occurrence. No need for multiple instances.
Adds support for reports, which can also be configured in a separate config file. They can specify queries, limits, sorting and which properties to display.
Especially important is the support for tree displaying -> using the parent relation, as well as incorporating datestamps of parents.
HOME=$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/tofo
$HOME/*rc for general configuration - multiple files allow cleaner config -> alternative: directory structure mimicking DOM for UNIX-style, but worse performance
$HOME/hooks contains hooks:
- on-start/on-exit
- on-change (any task change, add or mod)
- on-add (new task)
- on-mod (existing task changed)
$XDG_CACHE_HOME may contain the current state (context/entered task), since resetting that does no harm. Depending on the implementation, it could also hold a cache of the compiled rc.
A task has attributes, and each attribute is of one of the following types:
- string, timestamp, number, date, list (of strings)
- it should be possible to restrict a property to a set of values (enum)
- uid: string-computed (ulid/uuid)
- id: string (generated automatically, user-friendly but can be changed)
- parent: string
- entered, modified: timestamp
- urgency: number-computed
- status: enum-string-computed
- virtual tags?
- completable: boolean
- tags: list
- annotations: list
- wait,scheduled,due,until,recur: timestamp
- relativeRecur: boolean
- start,stop: timestamp
- priority, size: enum-string
- url: string
add <mods>
: add a new task under the currently selected one<id> add <mods>
: add a new task with as parent
If there is no selected task, the selected task is assumed to be an empty invisible root task
cd <id>
: select the given task (alternative names: open,select,ct("change task"))show
: show details for the currently selected task (maybe also subtasks)list
: list all direct subtaskstree
: recursively list subtasks
For more, see taskwarrior for now...