You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Both ICAO Annex 3 and WAFCs' document Representing WAFC Significant Weather (SIGWX) data in BUFR do not give any clue whether metadata on projection is required for representing SIGWX objects for WAFC SIGWX charts as in VAA, SIGMET and AIRMET. In fact, the latter document suggests rendering software to use cubic spline routine for smoothing the line between points irrespective of the output projection. This seems to imply all SIGWX objects are prepared on the same projection or the difference between the projections for preparation and rendering are irrelevant/insignificant.
We may want to confirm with WAFCs on the need of projection metadata for SIGWX objects.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
blchoy
changed the title
Projection used to prepare SIGWX objects in WAFS SIGWX charts
Projection used to prepare SIGWX objects in WAFC SIGWX charts
Oct 18, 2017
Referring #52.
Both ICAO Annex 3 and WAFCs' document Representing WAFC Significant Weather (SIGWX) data in BUFR do not give any clue whether metadata on projection is required for representing SIGWX objects for WAFC SIGWX charts as in VAA, SIGMET and AIRMET. In fact, the latter document suggests rendering software to use cubic spline routine for smoothing the line between points irrespective of the output projection. This seems to imply all SIGWX objects are prepared on the same projection or the difference between the projections for preparation and rendering are irrelevant/insignificant.
We may want to confirm with WAFCs on the need of projection metadata for SIGWX objects.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: