You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue is to keep track of a discrepancy between NNF with empty-trace and non-empty trace semantics.
For example, let us denote ~ the logical not and ! the propositional not. Also, let a be an atom.
The NNF of a is a in both semantics.
The NNF of !a is !a in both semantics.
The NNF of ~a should be !a | end for empty-trace sem., and !a for non-empty trace sem.
The NNF of ~!a should be a | end for empty-trace sem., and a for non-empty trace sem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue is to keep track of a discrepancy between NNF with empty-trace and non-empty trace semantics.
For example, let us denote
~
the logical not and!
the propositional not. Also, leta
be an atom.The NNF of
a
isa
in both semantics.The NNF of
!a
is!a
in both semantics.The NNF of
~a
should be!a | end
for empty-trace sem., and!a
for non-empty trace sem.The NNF of
~!a
should bea | end
for empty-trace sem., anda
for non-empty trace sem.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: