You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In TPAC, we had feedback from Pablo COCA (W3C Spanish Chapter?) that the landing page is not clear enough and that "WoT is not a protocol" is not coming through.
Some opinions from the call on 26.09:
We can start with some catchphrases, like "Not a protocol", "Domain Agnostic" etc.
The groups structure can come after the catchphrases, like "Get Involved" and point to what you can do with the different groups (e.g. WG for normative work with membership)
We should reconsider if we can benefit from the restructuring of the W3C landing page. The worst case would be copying the fonts, colors, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In TPAC, we had feedback from Pablo COCA (W3C Spanish Chapter?) that the landing page is not clear enough and that "WoT is not a protocol" is not coming through.
Some opinions from the call on 26.09:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: