Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

definitions in Semantics #118

Open
pfps opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

definitions in Semantics #118

pfps opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)

Comments

@pfps
Copy link
Contributor

pfps commented Nov 21, 2024

RDF Concepts does not define notions like entailment, equivalence, and inconsistency.

These terms are described in RDF Semantics and only loosely described in RDF Concepts.

The various links, etc., need to be adjusted to make RDF Semantics primary and RDF Concepts secondary.

The situation for notions like literal, triple, etc., is different. There RDF Concepts is primary.
@pfps pfps added the spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) label Dec 11, 2024
@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Jan 13, 2025

RDF Concepts does not define notions like entailment, equivalence, and inconsistency.

This is a case of providing the anchors so the terminology is in RDF Concepts.

RDF Concepts already says:

An entailment regime [RDF12-SEMANTICS] is a specification that defines precise conditions that make these relationships hold.

What wording do you suggest?

@gkellogg gkellogg mentioned this issue Jan 16, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@afs @pfps