-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
Issue Triage July 2020
Philippe Le Hegaret edited this page Jun 30, 2020
·
4 revisions
Number | Title | Disposition |
---|---|---|
#418 | Consolidate discipline-related elements | |
#417 | Enable pr-preview | |
#414 | Tighten the Scope for definition of Working Groups | |
#410 | Increasing voter turnout in AC reviews with incentives | |
#409 | Community Groups and Business Groups should be incorporated into the Process | |
#405 | CR Draft boilerplate | |
#402 | "Candidate Recommendation" is no longer an accurate term | |
#401 | Proposes changes to wide/horizontal review | |
#394 | Formalise HRG as mandatory by default | |
#393 | df | [meta][director-free] Eliminate role of The Director and redistribute authority from The Team to W3C members & co |
mmunity | ||
#392 | Process details that should NOT be owned by W3M/Team/CEO | |
#391 | df | Alternatives to "W3C Council" for adjudicating formal objections |
#386 | singular | |
#376 | Editorial pass | |
#373 | ambiguous statement for proxy in WG/IG | |
#368 | TAG appointed participants announcement by Director | |
#366 | df | Setup document management for director-free matters |
#360 | df | Director-less issues |
#358 | Revising a Recommendation: Substantive Changes or New Features. | |
#356 | 2021 | Streamlining the Process Document |
#354 | reg | What aspects of Registries should/may/should-not be published together? |
#353 | reg | Where are registries published? |
#351 | 2021 | Who publishes Technical Reports? |
#347 | Streamlining horizontal reviews | |
#346 | 2021 | Re-envisioning the CRUD/Snapshot split |
#342 | Decoupling Notes and REC track | |
#339 | Why can AC comments on CR be ignored? | |
#338 | 2021 | Decisions |
#337 | 2021 | Link to document on formal objection processing |
#335 | reg | Registries |
#334 | Recording of meetings | |
#333 | 2021 | Undefined: rationale for "short term(s)" for AB/TAG elections |
#331 | df | Please reconsider director-free formal objection handling |
#330 | reg | Survivability of registries |
#329 | reg | Guidance for registry creation |
#328 | TAG and AB should be able to formally review charters | |
#327 | df | W3C Council should be limited to one vote per member organization |
#326 | Community and Business Groups | |
#324 | 2021 | Do we need a lighter-weight process for superseding when it's "obvious"? |
#322 | 2021 | What are the rules for where/how W3C publications are developed? |
#316 | df | The Elephant in the Director-free Room |
#315 | df | TAG Appointment Committee composition |
#314 | df | Consensus in the TAG Appointment Committee - Formal Objections |
#313 | df | Team-Appointed TAG Chair(s) |
#312 | df | Suspension / Removal for cause |
#310 | df | TAG chair selection timing |
#299 | Make it clear than any decision can be objected to | |
#293 | df | [director-free] Should the Council be all TAG+AB, or smaller and separately elected? |
#291 | df | "W3C Council" may have to hear information in confidence |
#290 | df | How does W3C Council handle membership turnover? |
#284 | df | CEO is part of the AB, and ex-officio participant in Objection Decision Committee |
#281 | df | objecting to chair appointments |
#280 | df | What to do when there's no consensus in the Objection Decision Committee |
#279 | df | What can the Objection Decision Committee actually decide? |
#278 | df | Recusal from FO handling |
#277 | df | CEO recusal while handling FOs |
#276 | df | Generalize FO-handling |
#275 | df | discipline and CEO recusal |
#274 | Remove reference to stale document | |
#262 | What does the document status "discontinued" mean? | |
#254 | df | [director-free] Gratuitous mentions of the Director |
#251 | First meeting of a WG allowed too soon | |
#236 | Does the process assume all WDs are on the Rec. Track? | |
#230 | df | TAG appointment should be via IETF style nomcom |
#223 | Allow AB to choose its own chair | |
#182 | Define charter review process to require addressing comments as in CR transitions | |
#168 | reg | We need a process for handling registries, APIs and other 'enumerations' |
#167 | define "independent" | |
#157 | Should the process include something about Testing? | |
#141 | provide clearer/common wording for transitions to Obsolete/Superseded status | |
#137 | Concerns about Amended Recommendations | |
#130 | 2021 | Enumerate the requirements for wide review |
#120 | Process should say how W3T can update NOTES | |
#115 | We need to consider equal-preference voting | |
#103 | Should the process allow REC->WD transition directly? | |
#76 | Should there be good standing / supermajority criteria in authoritative ballots? | |
#63 | 2021 | Updates to sections 5.2.2 and 2.1.3.1 |
#60 | 2021 | Clarify the voting process |
#38 | 2021 | 7.1.1 Charter reviews on a public communication channel? |
#28 | 2021 | Substantive changes undefined for Charter and Process reviews |