You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We've received feedback on the two following items, and wanted to share our view as well as request others' view on them.
Should we expose whether the user decided to grant ephemerally or persistently?
We are worried about potential dark patterns that exposing this information would enable. For example, a website may decide to not accept an ephemeral grant at all. This would negatively impact the privacy benefits that one-time permissions provide. While there may be use cases where a site can use this information to improve the user experience, we believe that the risks outweigh the benefits.
Should navigator.permissions.request() allow specification of grant type?
Supporting the ability to request one-time grants only (i.e. showing no permanent grant option on the prompt), is privacy-positive, and something that we would be open to support. In case of API changes here, we believe only grant type restrictions towards more privacy preserving should be explored.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We've received feedback on the two following items, and wanted to share our view as well as request others' view on them.
We are worried about potential dark patterns that exposing this information would enable. For example, a website may decide to not accept an ephemeral grant at all. This would negatively impact the privacy benefits that one-time permissions provide. While there may be use cases where a site can use this information to improve the user experience, we believe that the risks outweigh the benefits.
Supporting the ability to request one-time grants only (i.e. showing no permanent grant option on the prompt), is privacy-positive, and something that we would be open to support. In case of API changes here, we believe only grant type restrictions towards more privacy preserving should be explored.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: