Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor mistakes in EPUB AT 1.1 #2611

Closed
typopaul opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2612
Closed

Minor mistakes in EPUB AT 1.1 #2611

typopaul opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2612
Labels
Cat-Accessibility Grouping label for all accessibility related issues Spec-A11yTechniques The issue affects the EPUB Accessibility Techniques WG Note Type-Editorial The issue does not affect conformance

Comments

@typopaul
Copy link

typopaul commented Apr 11, 2024

Since I do not have the experience with pull-request, I would like to give this infomation to someone who has an executive role in editing this document:

I found two minor mistakes in the EPUB Accessibility Techniques 1.1.
https://www.w3.org/TR/epub-a11y-tech-11/

Section 3.6, example 6 -- Cypher "3" typo.

<meta3

should be

<meta

Section 4.4.2 -- Words "to need" should be switched.

EPUB creators also to need chunk

should be

EPUB creators also need to chunk

@mattgarrish mattgarrish added Cat-Accessibility Grouping label for all accessibility related issues Spec-A11yTechniques The issue affects the EPUB Accessibility Techniques WG Note Type-Editorial The issue does not affect conformance labels Apr 11, 2024
@mattgarrish
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the report! I've opened #2612 to get these fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Cat-Accessibility Grouping label for all accessibility related issues Spec-A11yTechniques The issue affects the EPUB Accessibility Techniques WG Note Type-Editorial The issue does not affect conformance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants