You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would find it useful to have a dedicated type, other than owl:Ontology, to type SHACL specifications.
In particular in systems that manage both OWL ontologies and SHACL specifications, to distinguish them.
Also because metadata properties are attached to this entity (versions, dates, etc.)
e.g. sh:ShapesGraph (upper case S), probably a subClassOf owl:Ontology.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would find it useful to have a dedicated type, other than owl:Ontology, to type SHACL specifications.
In particular in systems that manage both OWL ontologies and SHACL specifications, to distinguish them.
Also because metadata properties are attached to this entity (versions, dates, etc.)
e.g.
sh:ShapesGraph
(upper case S), probably a subClassOf owl:Ontology.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: