Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coverage is skewed towards local instances #27

Open
TobiasGoerke opened this issue Aug 2, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Coverage is skewed towards local instances #27

TobiasGoerke opened this issue Aug 2, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested

Comments

@TobiasGoerke
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage is calculated based upon the perturbation function.
The tabular perturbation function changes the non-fixed features randomly, given a predefined probability. As soon as this specified probability is < 1, non representative instances get generated, as the instance's value appear statistically more often.
This returns in a coverage that is not representative regarding the whole dataset.
If we, however, change the probability to 1 for generating coverage perturbations, we might violate anchor's theoretical description but make rules more intuitive.

@TobiasGoerke TobiasGoerke added question Further information is requested help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Aug 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant