You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear Prof. Bell
I want to know that the three COSMO-SAC models (i.e., COSMO-SAC-2002, COSMO-SAC -2010 and COSMO-SAC-dsp ) in the open source C++ and python implementation provide you whether can be directly used to predict the activity coefficients for mixed systems containg ionic liquids, without adding extra the Pitzer-Debye-Huckel term.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well, if I am not mistaken, yes you can certainly predict activity coefficients. But there is a big difference between predicting values and predicting accurate values. I think that is likely to be the issue. I think you could predict activity coefficients without Pitzer-Debye-Huckel but they would likely be quite erroneous. But you'd only know by comparison with experimental data.
Dear Prof. Bell
I want to know that the three COSMO-SAC models (i.e., COSMO-SAC-2002, COSMO-SAC -2010 and COSMO-SAC-dsp ) in the open source C++ and python implementation provide you whether can be directly used to predict the activity coefficients for mixed systems containg ionic liquids, without adding extra the Pitzer-Debye-Huckel term.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: