You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi For the map -- using an absolute measurement in a choropleth is a semiologic error - (unless it would be a choropleth with polygons of a similar size) -
Either we convert the value to be displayed to a % of change in comparison of previous year - the it's a ratio and we can keep a choropleth -
or better we keep absolute number of persons increase/decrease and use proportional symbols with a color code to encode the relative percentage of the increase in comparison with the existing population
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Edouard-Legoupil
changed the title
The map should be proportional symbol - not choropleth
The map should use proportional symbol - not choropleth
Oct 7, 2017
Hi For the map -- using an absolute measurement in a choropleth is a semiologic error - (unless it would be a choropleth with polygons of a similar size) -
Either we convert the value to be displayed to a % of change in comparison of previous year - the it's a ratio and we can keep a choropleth -
or better we keep absolute number of persons increase/decrease and use proportional symbols with a color code to encode the relative percentage of the increase in comparison with the existing population
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: