diff --git a/physics/docs/pdftxt/CLM_LAKE.txt b/physics/docs/pdftxt/CLM_LAKE.txt
index e0a8d9209..d78244cb2 100644
--- a/physics/docs/pdftxt/CLM_LAKE.txt
+++ b/physics/docs/pdftxt/CLM_LAKE.txt
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ in the UFS SRW App, is capable of capturing the effect of lakes on regional heat
 Lake depths for the RRFS lake configuration (Fig.1) are assigned from a global dataset provided by Kourzeneva et al.(2012) \cite Kourzeneva_2012,
 this dataset is referred to as GLOBv3 bathymetry in the UFS_UTL.
 
-\image html Lake_depths_RRFS3km.png "Figure 1: Lake depths for lakes in the 3-km RRFS domain." width=600
+@image html https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12705538/250180794-76af93a2-a7ba-4e9a-9478-5657198862b8.png "Figure 1: Lake depths for lakes in the 3-km RRFS domain." width=600
 
 To cold-start the CLM lake model in the UFS SRW App:
 - Use the CLM option in the input.nml
@@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ To cold-start the CLM lake model in the UFS SRW App:
 - Lake ice at the top level is initialized from the GFS ice concentration
 
 The differences of surface variables from the experimental RRFS 6-h forecast with/without CLM lake model are shown in Figure 2 for 2-m temperature and in Figure 3 for 2-m dewpoint.
-\image html diff_t2m_lake_rrfs.png "Figure 2: Differences of 2-m temperature between the RRFS coupled to the CLM model and the RRFS without CLM." width=600
-\image html diff_td2m_lake_rrfs.png "Figure 3: Differences of 2-m dew point between the RRFS coupled to the CLM model and the RRFS without CLM." width=600
+@image html https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12705538/250180790-63159300-33f6-4b34-9e9c-b65885213c30.png "Figure 2: Differences of 2-m temperature between the RRFS coupled to the CLM model and the RRFS without CLM." width=600
+@image html https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12705538/250180787-8fc9a820-5f80-4f06-b50a-88b2d20ebc53.png "Figure 3: Differences of 2-m dew point between the RRFS coupled to the CLM model and the RRFS without CLM." width=600
  
 
 
diff --git a/physics/docs/pdftxt/RUCLSM.txt b/physics/docs/pdftxt/RUCLSM.txt
index 7a39faf84..a836e7b93 100644
--- a/physics/docs/pdftxt/RUCLSM.txt
+++ b/physics/docs/pdftxt/RUCLSM.txt
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ to determine the uncertainty range for the selected parameters in the RUC LSM.
 
 ## RUC LSM characteristics that differ from Noah LSM:
 \image html ruc_lsm_veg_soil.png "Figure 1: RUC LSM Vegetation and Soil Model (Courtesy of T.G. Smirnova) " width=900
-\image html ruc_ranking.png "Figure 2: Model ranking as a function of normalized root mean square error of snow water equivalent and surface temperature (Courtesy of C. Menard)" width=900
+@image html https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12705538/250180784-d50a3d4c-93db-4d8d-b12d-2c0ca22da5c3.png "Figure 2: Model ranking as a function of normalized root mean square error of snow water equivalent and surface temperature (Courtesy of C. Menard)" width=900
 - \b Implicit \b solution of energy and moisture budgets in the layer spanning the ground surface
 - \b 9 \b soil \b levels with high vertical resolution near surface
 RUC LSM has more levels in soil than \ref GFS_NOAH model with higher resolution near the interface with the atmosphere
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Snow forms additional two layers on top of soil in RUC LSM
 \image html ruc_lsm_mosaic.png "Figure 4: 'Mosaic' approach for patchy snow (Courtesy of T.G. Smirnova) " width=900
   - New: additional options to compute snow cover fraction (\p isncovr_opt =2 and 3, Niu and Yang (2007) \cite Niu_2007). These options allowed to reduce overprediction of number of grid cells fully covered with snow which further reduced cold-biases over snow. Figure 5 demonstrates that option 3 of snow cover fraction computation (\p isncovr_opt = 3) in the UFS-based regional model matches better the satellite data for the test case on 6 February 2022.
 - New: added an option to use of a new formulation of snow thermal conductivity (\p isncond_opt = 2, Sturm et al. (1997) \cite sturm_1997);
-\image html sncov_rrfs_ruc.png "Figure 5: Snow cover fraction from MODIS (a,b), Regional UFS-based system (RRFS) original (c), and modified with isncover_opt=3 (d), 6 February 2022. (Courtesy of T.G. Smirnova)"  width=900
+@image html https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12705538/250180782-925303ec-7751-4d7e-be8f-b3f1323f35d4.png "Figure 5: Snow cover fraction from MODIS (a,b), Regional UFS-based system (RRFS) original (c), and modified with isncover_opt=3 (d), 6 February 2022. (Courtesy of T.G. Smirnova)"  width=900
 - Iterative snow melting algorithm;
 - Density of snow on the ground - a function of compaction parameter and snow depth and temperature;
 - Snow albedo - a function of temperature and snow fraction;