You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been experimenting with improving performance with various tools, and I've noticed that sf uses very low resources as its default is one file at a time. I've used the -multi flag with various values and performance skyrockets, with hard disk bandwith being the bottleneck.
Allowing a user to specify a value (between 1 and 256) for -multi could lead to major performance boosts.
I could probably add this if you felt like it make sense?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @kieranjol, apologies for the delay in responding but yes, this sounds like a great improvement! Feel free to submit a PR if you'd like, or I can try to find some time in the near future to add this.
I've been experimenting with improving performance with various tools, and I've noticed that sf uses very low resources as its default is one file at a time. I've used the -multi flag with various values and performance skyrockets, with hard disk bandwith being the bottleneck.
Allowing a user to specify a value (between 1 and 256) for -multi could lead to major performance boosts.
I could probably add this if you felt like it make sense?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: