You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
the seas system ontology is a valuable asset when describing technical systems. Looking into it again I came across the commented property chain axiom for seas:conectedTo in v1.1. and v1.0.
OK thanks @maximelefrancois86 for this clarification. I was wondering if it makes sense to omit the commented line in the file? or add to the commented line a comment ^^
# Logically applies but resulting ontology is outside of OWL 2 DL# seas:connectedTo owl:propertyChainAxiom ( seas:connectedThrough seas:connectsSystem ) .
Dear @maximelefrancois86,
the seas system ontology is a valuable asset when describing technical systems. Looking into it again I came across the commented property chain axiom for seas:conectedTo in v1.1. and v1.0.
# seas:connectedTo owl:propertyChainAxiom ( seas:connectedThrough seas:connectsSystem ) .
Why has this been commented? It would be helpful to have the same chain rule applied as for
best
Georg
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: