Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Double Sided #1

Open
PseudoCorps opened this issue May 18, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Double Sided #1

PseudoCorps opened this issue May 18, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@PseudoCorps
Copy link

So I've been going through the tool files trying to make it so I can build the bottom of a solid with different values, and I think that I might not fully understand how that works.
Say I have two separate tessellated images, is there a good way to go about connecting the backs of the two (if the sizes match up)?
I tried adjusting the min values of the facets to be the z values of the opposing side, but that gave strange sort of spaghetti type results.

Also, is there a way to set the solid=true parameter from cli?

@thearn
Copy link
Owner

thearn commented May 19, 2014

Say I have two separate tessellated images, is there a good way to go about connecting the backs of the two (if the sizes match up)?

Interesting - that should be pretty doable, but I'd have to think about it for a bit. I honestly haven't done much with the core algorithms since I converted them to C using cython. But the generation of solid models is one part which could be done much, much better.

Basically, it just copies down all vertices, but at a height aligned with the "bottom" of the model. Terribly, horribly inefficient. But it does give a solid printable STL.

I'll look into getting the solid option settable from CLI. I think I made it general enough that it should accept the option already, but I'll try to verify that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants