You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The ontologically correct approach to entailed phenotypes is to have another cell type that is subClassOf the equivalent class necessary and sufficient condition type that is itself subClassOf the entailed types. This will avoid cases where there are single individual counter examples. In additional we probably want a relationship that we can use to indicate which subclasses we want to use as "high probability entailed phenotype bag" or something like that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The ontologically correct approach to entailed phenotypes is to have another cell type that is subClassOf the equivalent class necessary and sufficient condition type that is itself subClassOf the entailed types. This will avoid cases where there are single individual counter examples. In additional we probably want a relationship that we can use to indicate which subclasses we want to use as "high probability entailed phenotype bag" or something like that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: