Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 7, 2024. It is now read-only.

Rack/non racked device sizes pulled in from object #9

Open
dBitech opened this issue Sep 17, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Rack/non racked device sizes pulled in from object #9

dBitech opened this issue Sep 17, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@dBitech
Copy link

dBitech commented Sep 17, 2023

The size of the object shown on the floor plan should come from the rack/device being added to the map. At the moment when you place a rack, it comes into the map as 24x36", even if the Rack's dimensions are specified as 19x6 (a 2 post rack for example)

@tbotnz
Copy link
Owner

tbotnz commented Sep 18, 2023

Hi @dBitech do you want to open a PR, adding support for this??

@tbotnz tbotnz added help wanted Extra attention is needed enhancement New feature or request labels Sep 18, 2023
@justin-davisibm
Copy link
Contributor

Something to discuss @tbotnz - what's your vision for handling non-racked devices? They don't have a true size construct in Netbox, and I know teams all handle them somewhat differently....

The two main ones I've seen:

  • Custom Fields
  • Fake Racks- i.e. build a custom "rack" the size of say... a CRAC- and then place a "device" within it, filling the unit.

The other option may be just to allow manual resize of the object if it's not a rack? Maybe an additonal custom_meta with "resizeable": true or similar?

@tbotnz
Copy link
Owner

tbotnz commented Sep 28, 2023

@justin-davisibm I think for now we just allow non racled devices to have their width / depth changed on thr floorplan through dragging. Once netbox adds support on thr device type then we can update accordingly

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants