Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
133 lines (106 loc) · 6.15 KB

charter.md

File metadata and controls

133 lines (106 loc) · 6.15 KB
Raw

SIG Testing Charter

This charter adheres to the conventions described in the Kubernetes Charter README and uses the Roles and Organization Management outlined in sig-governance.

Scope

SIG Testing is interested in effective testing of Kubernetes and automating away project toil. We focus on creating and running tools and infrastructure that make it easier for the community to write and run tests, and to contribute, analyze and act upon test results.

Although we are not responsible for ongoing test maintenance (see [Out of Scope] below), we will act as an escalation point of last resort for remediation if it is clear that misbehaving tests are harming the immediate health of the project.

In scope

Code, Binaries and Services

  • Project CI and workflow automation via tools such as prow and tide

  • Infrastructure to support running project CI at scale, including tools such as boskos, ghproxy and greenhouse

  • Providing a place and schema in which to upload test results for contributors who wish to provide additional test results not generated by the project's CI

  • Extraction, display and analysis of test artifacts via tools like gubernator, kettle, testgrid, and triage

  • Configuration management of jobs and ensuring they use a consistent process via tools such as job configs, kubetest

  • Tools that facilitate configuration management of github such as peribolos and label_sync

  • Tools that facilitate local testing of kubernetes such as greenhouse and kind

  • Ensuring all of the above is kept running on a best effort basis

  • Tools, frameworks and libraries that make it possible to write tests against kubernetes such as e2e* or integration test frameworks.

    * Note that while we are the current de facto owners of the kubernetes e2e test framework, we are not staffed to actively maintain or rewrite it and welcome contributors looking to take on this responsibility.

Cross-cutting and Externally Facing Processes

Ongoing Support
  • We actively collaborate with SIG Contributor Experience, often producing tooling that they are responsible for using to implement policies and processes that they own, e.g. the Github Administration subproject uses peribolos and label_sync to reduce the toil involved
  • We reserve the right to halt automation and infrastructure that we own, or disable tests that we don't own if the project as a whole is being impacted
  • We are actively assisting with the transition of project infrastructure to the CNCF and enabling non-Googlers to support this
Deploying Changes

We aspire to remain agile and deploy quickly, while ensuring a disruption-free experience for project contributors. As such, the amount of notice we provide and the amount of consensus we seek is driven by our estimation of risk. We don't currently define risk in terms of objective metrics, so here is a rough description of the guidelines we follow. We anticipate refining these over time.

  • Low risk changes do not break existing contributor workflows, are easy to roll back, and impact at most a few project repos or SIGs. These should be reviewed by another member of SIG Testing or the affected SIG(s), preferably an approver.

  • Medium risk changes may impact existing contributor workflows, should be easy to roll back, and may impact all of the project's repos. These should be shared with SIG Contributor Experience, may require a lazy consensus issue with [email protected] notice.

  • High risk changes likely break existing contributor workflows, may be difficult to roll back, and likely impact all of the project's repos. These require a consultation with SIG Contributor Experience, and a lazy consensus issue with [email protected] notice.

Out of Scope

  • We are not responsible for writing, fixing nor actively troubleshooting tests for features or subprojects owned by other SIGs
  • We are not responsible for ongoing maintenance of the project's CI Signal, as this is driven by tests and jobs owned by other SIGs. We do however have an interest in producing tools to help improve the signal.

Roles and Organization Management

This sig adheres to the Roles and Organization Management outlined in sig-governance and opts-in to updates and modifications to sig-governance.

Deviations from sig-governance

  • Proposing and making decisions MAY be done without the use of KEPS so long as the decision is documented in a linkable medium. We prefer to use issues on kubernetes/test-infra to document technical decisions, and mailing list threads on kubernetes-sig-testing@ to document administrative decisions on leadership, meetings and subprojects.
  • We do not consistently review sig-testing testgrid dashboards as part of our meetings

Subproject Creation

Subprojects are created by Tech Leads following the process defined in sig-governance