Is it still relevant to distribute Sozi for 32-bit architectures? #521
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Hi, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
A lot of chromebooks run crouton (linux) in 32bit environment. So the millions of Sozi users working on chromebooks would be affected. So the question is, do you want to support chromebook users for another 2 years or so . |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sozi releases are usually built for Linux, Windows and MacOS X, and for 32-bit and 64-bit Intel/AMD architectures when possible.
Based on the download statistics of the latest stable release, 17% of Linux and Windows users downloaded the 32-bit package.
I see two possible reasons for that:
Building and uploading packages for all platforms and architectures take time. Since there is a demand for additional package formats (RPM or flatpak for Linux) and additional architectures (ARM essentially), I am planning to drop 32-bit support in the next releases.
What do you think? Is is still relevant to ship Sozi packages for 32-bit architectures?
For background information, the Sozi presentation editor is based on Electron, a desktop application development framework using web technologies. While the Electron blog announced that 32-bit Linux support would be discontinued starting from Electron 4, it seems that I can still build 32-bit versions of Sozi with Electron 9.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions