-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is there a typo in the names of the processed instructions? #19
Comments
Also, I want to mention some other strange places that I've encountered. Maybe someday they will be fixed.
|
Hello, Thank you for your keen eyes, @TopCoder2K ! With regards to your questions 1~5, (general answer: A lot of engineering went into this work; I tried to clean the code but there are still some remnants of it.. sorry. )
3-4. For these, users can customize it as they want.
|
And thank you very much, @TopCoder2K ! |
@soyeonm, thank you for your fast response! As for 5, should the README file be updated then? The command
should be
since the model is always loaded from And if the README gets fixed, I also want to remind you about this issue. |
@TopCoder2K , thanks very much once again. I changed the readme. With regards to this issue, I will reply again soon! But I do believe it does work.. does it not? |
The #9 (comment) states that it's necessary to use |
There are no files with names '*test_seen_appended.p' and '*test_unseen_appended.p' in
models/instructions_processed_LP/
, although it's clear thatread_test_dict
tries to load files with 'appended' in names.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: