Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setting synchronization scope of OLB #44

Open
tormoseng opened this issue Sep 29, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Setting synchronization scope of OLB #44

tormoseng opened this issue Sep 29, 2015 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tormoseng
Copy link

In current version (branch without-i43-server) I cannot set the scope property to "synchronization scope". The drop-down menu shows it, but I cannot choose it.

@snowball77
Copy link

To add upon this: Any drop down property is broken. This seems to be a bug in the LPE commons code.

@tormoseng
Copy link
Author

I guess you´re right. I was able to use it - BUT after changing the default value of the property in the code and re-build it.

@snowball77
Copy link

Funny enough, that was also the solution I used at a different place :D
It is "just" a UI-issue.

Am 29.09.15 um 14:02 schrieb Tor M:

I guess you´re right. I was able to use it - BUT after changing the
default value of the property in the code and re-build it.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#44 (comment).

Prof. Steffen Becker
Professur Softwaretechnik
Angewandte Informatik

Technische Universität Chemnitz
Straße der Nationen 62 | R. B216B
09111 Chemnitz
Germany

Tel: +49 371 531-36144
Fax: +49 371 531-836144

[email protected]
www.tu-chemnitz.de

@MarcelTUC
Copy link

We found out that it seems to be an MAC-Bug. I am a Windows-User and there are no problems on selecting for example the scope - so for me its not possible to fix this bug.
We take a look at the code and I think the bug has its reason in the CustomComboBoxCellEditor of the DynamicSpotter in the Package org.spotter.eclipse.ui.editors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants