Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improving model-training notebook and 'trainers.py' #112

Open
pollytur opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Improving model-training notebook and 'trainers.py' #112

pollytur opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@pollytur
Copy link

  1. The standard trainer will not stop and will not give any warning if the loss when to 'nan', it will just keep training.
  2. It would be nice to add in the example notebooks 'track_training': True', 'verbose': True for the trainer_config (as its crucially needed for other models experiments)
@KonstantinWilleke
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi - yes I agree that (1) is an important feature. Has the validation accuracy been a NaN value?

Same for (2), it'd be a great addition to make it more user-friendly. If you already developed your own tracking, feel free to issue a PR against the current main.

Thanks a lot again for your helpful suggestions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants