Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improving the default model flexibility #110

Open
pollytur opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Improving the default model flexibility #110

pollytur opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@pollytur
Copy link

I would suggest to add **kwargs here and here as otherwise it does not allow to change some of the parameters, which are not stated in the function while they are in the further constructors (I was trying to change the activation function, thats how I ended up with it)

Hope this would help!

@KonstantinWilleke KonstantinWilleke self-assigned this Aug 30, 2022
@KonstantinWilleke
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! Yes thank you for these suggestions. Yes our Core modules aren't completely flexible. But this would be a good functionality to add.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants