You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We want to extend our processing to include at least one iteration of HWPSS estimation between glitch + jump detection. The idea being that the template estimation will be improved once glitches are flagged and filled and smaller glitches are more easily caught after the HWPSS is subtracted. So 1) flag the biggest glitches/jumps 2) fill them 3) estimate + subtract hwpss 4) flag + fill glitches and jumps again 5) add back in hwpss template 6) re-estimate hwpss template with the.
Currently we're not doing this because 1) we expect the HWPSS template bias is fairly small and 2) the overall processing time is slow so this was an obvious cut for now until we speed things up as raised in issue #981
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We want to extend our processing to include at least one iteration of HWPSS estimation between glitch + jump detection. The idea being that the template estimation will be improved once glitches are flagged and filled and smaller glitches are more easily caught after the HWPSS is subtracted. So 1) flag the biggest glitches/jumps 2) fill them 3) estimate + subtract hwpss 4) flag + fill glitches and jumps again 5) add back in hwpss template 6) re-estimate hwpss template with the.
Currently we're not doing this because 1) we expect the HWPSS template bias is fairly small and 2) the overall processing time is slow so this was an obvious cut for now until we speed things up as raised in issue #981
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: