Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider supporting manual token exchange #44

Open
simon-weber opened this issue Jun 1, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Consider supporting manual token exchange #44

simon-weber opened this issue Jun 1, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@simon-weber
Copy link
Owner

As B16f00t mentioned in #37 (comment), this could help in situations where the usual login flow is broken or otherwise impossible. #41 has an example implementation.

@kiwiz
Copy link
Contributor

kiwiz commented Sep 27, 2023

Bump! The manual token exchange appears to be more reliable at the moment. Could support be added for using this flow? I can make updates to the PR as appropiate.

@simon-weber
Copy link
Owner Author

You're referring to #41? I don't remember much about it. Can you share the code you're using?

@kiwiz
Copy link
Contributor

kiwiz commented Oct 18, 2023

Yup. This README has details on the flow. In short, the endpoint is passed an OAuth token which needs to be manually obtained by a user. The benefit is that it appears to sidestep the authentication issues that users are experiencing. The changes in the PR should still be relevant, but the code could possibly be broken out into a separate method.

@kiwiz
Copy link
Contributor

kiwiz commented Dec 12, 2023

Hi again! Any additional context/investigation work I can provide here?

@simon-weber
Copy link
Owner Author

I reopened #41.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants