You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reason I ask: I'm looking for a way to detect new performers, without querying the entire list of performers. If the ids are known to increment, then I can sort by id.desc, and only paginate until I find a known id, saving a bunch of API calls.
But, there are many gaps in the ids, so I wonder if the ids are assigned in a pseudo-random order, which would render this strategy unusable.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reason I ask: I'm looking for a way to detect new performers, without querying the entire list of performers. If the ids are known to increment, then I can sort by id.desc, and only paginate until I find a known id, saving a bunch of API calls.
But, there are many gaps in the ids, so I wonder if the ids are assigned in a pseudo-random order, which would render this strategy unusable.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: