You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the approach is to treat every projection year as having a unique f parameter and they can just happen to be the same value.
This is simplest coding wise to also allow for the flexibility of multiple changes in f in the future (e.g. cyclical patterns) but it slows projections down since it adds a lot of gradient calculations.
Instead the future f values could take segment values as is done in the fitting phase to minimize the number of parameters in the ODE.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently the approach is to treat every projection year as having a unique f parameter and they can just happen to be the same value.
This is simplest coding wise to also allow for the flexibility of multiple changes in f in the future (e.g. cyclical patterns) but it slows projections down since it adds a lot of gradient calculations.
Instead the future f values could take segment values as is done in the fitting phase to minimize the number of parameters in the ODE.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: