Naming convention for changeset (discussion)

[rin-st]

What do you think about naming convention for changesets? Because currently, it's a bit chaotic how we write it https://github.com/scaffold-eth/create-eth/releases

I think it would be good if we write it that way
<scope>: <what was changed>

Possible scope's: cli, hardhat, foundry, next, external-extensions, curated-extensions, gh-actions, general? etc. Do we need to capitalize?

For example
cli: fix listr spamming
curated-extensions: added eip-712

Or maybe just as conventional commits? What do you think?

[technophile-04]

Ohh yeah 100% agree! Love the scope idea too!