You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In contrast, the fix uses the outermost function name from sys.calls(), which corresponds with my wrapper function.
It then tries to copy the non-existent value into "AzimuthReference", which deletes the desired entry.
I think this can be fixed by using the innermost (last) function name from sys.calls(), as this is the function that calls Tool<-.
Hey - I recently started using Azimuth and have had some trouble similar to #155 when building a reference:
It seems the fix (b1b6895) has a bug in the logic trying to generate the automatically assigned tool name.
The
Tool<-
method gets the function name that calledTool<-
, per https://github.com/satijalab/seurat-object/blob/release/5.0.1/R/seurat.R#L2636.In this case, the
Tool<-
call uses the correct "AzimuthReference".In contrast, the fix uses the outermost function name from
sys.calls()
, which corresponds with my wrapper function.It then tries to copy the non-existent value into "AzimuthReference", which deletes the desired entry.
I think this can be fixed by using the innermost (last) function name from
sys.calls()
, as this is the function that callsTool<-
.For reference, I am running https://github.com/satijalab/azimuth/tree/release/0.5.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: