You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not sure how well this would work or if it would be desirable, but what if n-ary functions were implemented as definitions outside of the core? This would simplify proof-checking, but proofs would be longer. This may (or may not) be a desirable trade. Alternatively, we could keep the core as is but translate proofs from into something that can be checked by a simpler proof-checker. It's worth exploring the possibilities before deciding.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
wwitzel
changed the title
Only unary functions in the core
Only unary/binary functions in the core
Mar 25, 2024
I'm not sure how well this would work or if it would be desirable, but what if n-ary functions were implemented as definitions outside of the core? This would simplify proof-checking, but proofs would be longer. This may (or may not) be a desirable trade. Alternatively, we could keep the core as is but translate proofs from into something that can be checked by a simpler proof-checker. It's worth exploring the possibilities before deciding.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: