Replies: 5 comments 11 replies
-
any thoughts about this, @andreivladbrg? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Any additional thoughts on this, @andreivladbrg, @smol-ninja? I think that disabling the utils CI checks would minimize the error rates in PRs. Maybe we could incorporate the utils tests in the daily cron schedule for fork tests. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since we all have agreed to move precompile tests alongside the fork tests schedule, should I close this discussion and create an issue out of it? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Closing it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would suggest that we should bring the fork tests back into ci with less number of runs (~ 20). During PR reviews, it would be helpful to see fork tests passing with the new changes. What's your opinions? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
One of the most common reasons for git conflicts and CI failure nowadays are the Precompiles tests failing:
https://github.com/sablier-labs/v2-core/blob/36223aeb1867b2fc197978fca19cbd5fcc538914/test/utils/Precompiles.t.sol
@andreivladbrg, what would you say about refactoring the CI workflows to only run the Precompiles tests once weekly, just like the CI Deep workflow?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions