Replies: 5 comments
-
I agree that this would be a nice thing to have, but I would classify it as a priority 3 or a priority 4.
Yes, possible to create streams. But at withdrawal time, it would still be the wrapped token version that the recipient receives. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Possible implementations for this, ranked from most to least plausible:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Unfortunately, we really don't have time for this now. It would be overkill, since users can just stream Locking. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is now possible thanks to our recent decision to employ the proxy approach. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For future reference - the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Our protocol allows for streaming of ERC20 tokens. While this reduces complexity to only having to handle one type of asset, we lack the possibility to stream chain native assets, such as ETH (on Ethereum), MATIC (on Polygon) or most recently requested RON (on Ronin).
With v1 because we don't have
onBehalf/from
variants for our methods it would be hard to achieve wrap+create, unwrap+withdraw. With v2 tho, this will be possible with a custom router that has payable functions and chains these transactions.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions