Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Alternative names for "Requests For Comments":
Alternative names for "Improvement Proposals":
Generally speaking, it'd be best to go for the standard "Requests For Comments" and "Improvement Proposals", to ease the burden of adopting a new terminology for SabVM that the potential contributors would have to carry.
It'd be better if both prefixes are the same, for consistency and simplicity. Now, given that the "M"-prefixed names ("Moniac"/"Mesh") have won the recent company poll, how about the following naming (with "Moniac" as an example):
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Problem
SabVM will eventually become an open-source project and a public good, meant to be continuously improved by the global community of Sablier developers.
To that end, we need a pipeline of Improvement Proposals equivalent to EIPs (Ethereum Improvement Proposals) and PEPs (Python Enhancement Proposals), and another pipeline for RCs (Request for Comments).
Taken Names
As always, naming isn't easy. The obvious candidates are taken:
Suggestions
SBRC
SBRC = Sab Request for Comments
Couldn't think of any other better name. Maybe SABRC, but it would be fairly long.
SEPs
The only good name I could come up with is SEPs, which stands for Sab Enhancement Proposals.
Claude made several other recommendations, but I don't think any of those is better than SEPs.
SEPs appear to be unused in crypto. Some web2 tech and biology projects have used, but none appear to be active anymore.
Related
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions