Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

solr core of demo application #5

Open
demo055 opened this issue May 6, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

solr core of demo application #5

demo055 opened this issue May 6, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@demo055
Copy link

demo055 commented May 6, 2014

I have multiple web applications in tomcat and i have problem solr core to be accessible on specific url. Explanation here:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22914592/how-to-make-spatial-sandbox-applications-solr-core-accessible-with-multiple-tom

@dsmiley
Copy link
Collaborator

dsmiley commented May 6, 2014

Spatial-Solr-Sandbox is a demonstration and tool. It makes hard-coded assumptions that Solr is available at "/solr/". I suggest not trying to deploy it to anything; just run it via "mvn jetty:run".

@demo055
Copy link
Author

demo055 commented May 8, 2014

Thank you i understand now. But could you please tell me how can i add LSE support to my SOLR 4.0?

@dsmiley
Copy link
Collaborator

dsmiley commented May 8, 2014

That depends on what it is you want in LSE. You could start by simply adding the JAR and add appropriate field types like you see in the demo app's schema. But LSE is compiled against trunk and, for example, the BBox field is based on a "Spatial Strategy" that has yet to be ported from trunk to 4x. It should port easily.

@namid
Copy link

namid commented Jan 23, 2015

Sorry this might not be the right forum to post in, but I'm looking for any benchmarks for spatial search performance - in particular the BBoxStrategy. Is there a better place where I could ask this question?

Thanks

@dsmiley
Copy link
Collaborator

dsmiley commented Jan 23, 2015

The right forum would be the Lucene java user list. Even if this were the right one, you should create a new issue, not hijack this one.

Nevertheless, no, I don't know of someone who has benchmarked it. If you want to do so, I recommend Lucene's benchmark module, which already has a sample spatial ".conf" but it may need a little more code, such as the hook to instantiate a BBoxStrategy. It can turn point data (from geonames out of the box) into boxes for benchmarking purposes. It will instantiate a RecursivePrefixTreeStrategy which I know is supported. If you have further questions, please ask them in some other context besides this unrelated issue/thread.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants