You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We currently have an Intent Label field within the Incoming Message element. However, as this element now mainly represents a state, we propose renaming it to State Label for clarity and alignment with its actual function.
Details:
Current Implementation: The Incoming Message element contains an "Intent Label" field, originally designed to represent user intent. It now covers intent, context, and conversation state.
Reason for Renaming: "Intent Label" is misleading; renaming it to "State Label" aligns with its purpose and enhances system clarity.
Impact: This change benefits development, reducing confusion and improving user-friendliness.
Documentation Update: Update relevant documentation. Especially the fact that end users should use unique labels
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description:
We currently have an
Intent Label
field within the Incoming Message element. However, as this element now mainly represents a state, we propose renaming it toState Label
for clarity and alignment with its actual function.Details:
Current Implementation: The Incoming Message element contains an "Intent Label" field, originally designed to represent user intent. It now covers intent, context, and conversation state.
Reason for Renaming: "Intent Label" is misleading; renaming it to "State Label" aligns with its purpose and enhances system clarity.
Impact: This change benefits development, reducing confusion and improving user-friendliness.
Documentation Update: Update relevant documentation. Especially the fact that end users should use unique labels
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: