Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Revamp to use futures under the hood for additional flexiblity #4

Open
russellpierce opened this issue Jul 14, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Revamp to use futures under the hood for additional flexiblity #4

russellpierce opened this issue Jul 14, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@russellpierce
Copy link
Owner

See https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/future
@russellpierce
Copy link
Owner Author

In particular, I'd rather not assign the dummy NULL, but instead return the future and instead use the mcparallelDo functionality to notify that a future has resolved. Alternatively, we could discontinue the package and merge with future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@russellpierce