You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in Eczar[wght].ttf, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.
To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
Glyph Chi was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] in '', [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10] in 'wght=800.0'
Glyph Kappa was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] in '', [0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 5, 4, 7, 8, 9] in 'wght=800.0'
Glyph Mu was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] in '', [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 6, 8, 9] in 'wght=800.0'
Glyph Upsilon was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] in '', [0, 1, 3, 2, 4] in 'wght=800.0'
Glyph asterisk was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] in '', [2, 0, 1, 3, 4] in 'wght=800.0'
Contour 3 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Contour 4 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph dvDGRa was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] in '', [0, 1, 3, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7] in 'wght=800.0'
Glyph dvKSDda was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour 11 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph dvKSTa was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour 8 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph dvKSTta was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour 8 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph dvNSMYa was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour 11 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph dvNgMa was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour 7 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph dvNyJYa was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour 2 start point differs: 0 in '', 2 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph dvNyJa was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour 2 start point differs: 0 in '', 2 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph dvSTRa was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph multiply was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour 0 start point differs: 0 in '', 2 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph uni090B.ss06 was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour 2 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph uni0937094D was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
Glyph uni0938094D was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=800.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=800.0'; reversed: False
This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please apologize and ignore & close it.
To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello!
This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in
Eczar[wght].ttf
, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
This report was generated using the
fonttools varLib.interpolatable
tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please apologize and ignore & close it.To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: