-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEAT] Improving Type Parameter Specification in useForm Hook #6137
Comments
Hey @noritsune thank you for the issue! I think I understand the problem here. While the The 4th generic can be the same with the 3rd by default and it will also only trigger errors if Do I understand it correctly? BTW, as a workaround I remember that one time I used a union type as 3rd that matches both the form and submission type and handled types in the custom |
@aliemir Thank you for your response. I think your understanding is correct. Also, I've mostly grasped what you're saying. So, are you suggesting that useForm should allow specifying the type of the onFinish function's argument (i.e., the type of data sent to the DataProvider) as the 4th type option? |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
+1 It's really hard to use TS without proper typing in here. I think it's better to use union type rather than "any" Hopefully we can get an enhancement on this soon. |
@chhaysotheara thank you for bumping the issue 😅 I'm leaving this comment as an implementation guide that we can follow when working on this feature. Using a union type for As I mentioned earlier, one more generic can be added but even now the generics are too crowded imo. Instead, now I'm more into having utility types to manage two of the generics in one. This will also allow us to continue accepting We can create one utility type // using symbols to avoid conflicting with the basic TVariables shape
const FormVariablesSymbol = Symbol("FormVariables");
const SubmissionVariablesSymbol = Symbol("SubmissionVariables");
export type CreateFormVariables<TFormVariables, TSubmissionVariables> = {
[FormVariablesSymbol]: TFormVariables;
[SubmissionVariablesSymbol]: TSubmissionVariables;
}; Then we can allow passing the type ExtractFormVariables<T> = T extends { [FormVariablesSymbol]: infer F } ? F : T;
type ExtractSubmissionVariables<T> = T extends { [SubmissionVariablesSymbol]: infer S; } ? S : T; Then in the implementation we can use those types and achieve this: type Data = { id: number; name: string; date: string; }
type FormValues = { name: string; }
type SubmissionValues = { name: string; date: Date; }
const { handleSubmit, refineCore: { onFinish } } = useForm<
Data,
HttpError,
CreateFormVariables<FormValues, SubmissionValues>
>({ ... });
// `values` will be in `FormValues` type
handleSubmit((values) => {
// `onFinish` will expect the argument to be in `SubmissionValues` type and will error if it doesn't match.
onFinish({ ...values, date: new Date() });
}); As you can see from the extraction utilities, current implementation is also supported with no changes: type Data = { id: number; name: string; }
type FormValues = { name: string; }
const { handleSubmit, refineCore: { onFinish } } = useForm<
Data,
HttpError,
/// this will continue working as expected
FormValues
// or
// FormValues | SubmissionValues
// will continue working as is
>({ ... });
Let us know what are your thoughts on this. We can include this in our roadmap for the upcoming improvements and features to Refine. We're currently at planning stage for this. Or if anyone is interested in working on this issue, they can use this comment as a guide. We'll happy to help to the contributors 🚀 🚀 |
hey @aliemir I’ve read through the discussion and I’d love to take on this issue. Thank you for the detailed implementation guide. I will go over it and fix it soon 🚀 |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'm developing a user information editing page using Refine, and I'm facing difficulties in clearly distinguishing between the form structure and the data type submitted to the DataProvider.
If you know of some way, please let me know.
Describe alternatives you've considered
If I don't specify types in the useForm function, this issue doesn't occur. However, that would negate the purpose of using TypeScript.
Additional context
Current Status and Investigation
I've extensively reviewed documentation and advanced tutorials on how to specify useForm's type parameters effectively, but haven't found a solution yet.
Context
Here is the project setup and code where I encountered the issue.
Framework Structure
Routing: Next.js (App Router)
Data Provider: SimpleRest
UI: Material UI
The Flow of Data
Problematic Code
I think it's beneficial that the FormProps type specified as the third type parameter of useForm is used by the reset and handleSubmit functions. This is because they rely on the form structure.
However, the same type is also enforced for the argument of the onFinish function. This causes a type error when trying to convert the FormProps type to the User type inside the handleSubmitInner function during submission.
Describe the thing to improve
To resolve this issue, consider adding an additional type parameter like SubmissionData to useForm. This would clarify distinctions between form structure and submission data types, ensuring a smoother TypeScript-driven development process.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: