Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support ClusterClass Operations #13050

Open
richard-cox opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Support ClusterClass Operations #13050

richard-cox opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/enhancement QA/dev-automation Issues that engineers have written automation around so QA doesn't have look at this RFC Originated or linked to an RFC
Milestone

Comments

@richard-cox
Copy link
Member

richard-cox commented Jan 10, 2025

Placeholder for work related to Rancher Turtles ClusterClass Operations RFC

Post 2.11

  • Group clusters (provisioning?) on ClusterClass's group's human name (spec.topology.class points to a cluster class's metadata.name. cluster classes will have an annotation specifying a human readable group name... which will be the group on sort param). This is blocked on SQLite backed cache: Sort namespaces on human name for project rancher#48637
  • Work with team to show summary of the state of the rollouts associated with a cluster class (both in list and detail pages). This isn't currently easily possibly given the application of selectors
  • Work with team to show summary of the state of the associated clusters (via rollouts) (both in list and detail pages). This isn't currently easily possibly given the application of selectors
@richard-cox richard-cox added this to the v2.11.0 milestone Jan 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the QA/dev-automation Issues that engineers have written automation around so QA doesn't have look at this label Jan 10, 2025
@richard-cox richard-cox added the RFC Originated or linked to an RFC label Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement QA/dev-automation Issues that engineers have written automation around so QA doesn't have look at this RFC Originated or linked to an RFC
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants