-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How do we approve PyLadies chapters? #7
Comments
We do need a way to vet requests as some people might make those requests with no plan or commitment to grow the community. I suggest requiring prospective chapter organizers to provide recommendations/references from already existing chapter organizers. This I believe would help make sure that new chapters that open are sustained and don't become inactive after some time. |
I agree that it would be great to hear more about their commitment. I think there are other ways to show commitment though, other than getting references. Some ideas are:
|
@Mariatta this sounds like something like updating the pyladies-kit with said resources! |
To be explicit, what problem are we trying to solve? |
@jackiekazil right now @Mariatta has added automation to this but basically we don’t want to just blindly approve. For example we need to confirm there isn’t already an active chapter. So the problem we have to solve is precisely that: what steps do we need to take to confirm a chapter is valid and should be created? This is captured in scope of work in the issue above. Another thought that has popped up in discussion at the monthly global meetings - do we want to add in further steps to validate if a request is legitimate? As of now we just default to approving at the monthly global meeting if the chapter doesn’t already exist. All of this when finalized should be clearly documented as well in the pyladies kit or elsewhere for organizers to find. |
I'd also want to know what would be the policy of who get to be organizers. Are we ok with men becoming PyLadies organizers? I also think it would help prospective organizers if we can answer the following:
|
RE: Men as leaders -- PyLadies CZ was started by men, I believe. As women became more active they were empowered by the men. (I am grossly summarizing it, but that might be a good group to check in with when thinking about guard rails or non-guard rails.) https://pyladies.cz/ |
It might make sense to have men be at most "interim" organizers or "startup" organizers. |
@Mariatta has started communication of these items in the https://github.com/pyladies/project-admin-logisitics/issues specifically:
Everyone here should weigh in @willingc @jackiekazil @primuse! As that project team is now "owning" this conversation we will close this issue. |
Overview
We don't have a clear policy for how to approve a PyLadies chapter. As of now we have started:
Scope of work
Temporary Response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: