Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove "Sort by relevance" option on Bookmarks page #4440

Open
3 tasks
maxkadel opened this issue Oct 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
3 tasks

Remove "Sort by relevance" option on Bookmarks page #4440

maxkadel opened this issue Oct 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
feature Updates on existing feature or a new feature request PO (high value) PO reviewed and high value

Comments

@maxkadel
Copy link
Contributor

User story

As a user, all items I have bookmarked are equally relevant to me, so a sort by relevance is meaningless.

Acceptance criteria

  • The default sort on the /bookmarks page is by title
  • The 'relevance' sort option does not appear on the /bookmarks page
  • The 'relevance' sort option is still the default for catalog searches

Implementation notes, if any

  • You can decide whether a sort option is displayed or not using if: or unless: configuration options with a lambda or proc
  • You can mark a field as the default sort using default: true (otherwise I believe it uses the first sort field int he config). I do not believe you can use a lambda or proc for the default field configuration. This may need to be an added feature in Blacklight to do this ticket.
@maxkadel maxkadel added the feature Updates on existing feature or a new feature request label Oct 15, 2024
@ellen-aa ellen-aa added the PO (high value) PO reviewed and high value label Oct 15, 2024
@ellen-aa
Copy link

@maxkadel PO-priority label added! I think sort by title makes good sense.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Updates on existing feature or a new feature request PO (high value) PO reviewed and high value
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants