Feature Request: Systemd services that have a Nice=
value given explicitly should not be touched by default background priority adjustments
#54
Labels
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
SystemD allows configuration of services with a
Nice
property. Which, to little surprise, adjusts the process(es) niceness on launch.For services that have such a
Nice=
explicitly given, system76-scheduler shouldn't subject them to the default background priority adjustments. Since in that case the service probably is lower or higher priority for good reason.(I'm classifying this as a feature request, not a bug, due to the sheer scope of work needed just to "fix" this bug)
For a bit more nuance, we could have
Nice
of <0 should never have their niceness raised above the configured value.Nice
of >0 should never have their niceness lowered below the configured value (unless it becomes the foreground process...somehow).IMO, per-process assignments in
assignments
should override systemd configured niceness by default.Maybe introduce a new config option (false by default) to have systemd managed services still take priority over process assignments.
I don't know of a current (efficient) way to tell the difference between an explicitly set
Nice=0
vs theNice=0
coming from the default of that property (either case showsNice=0
)I'd be fine with treating
Nice=0
the same as unset though.There is a
libsystemd
crate you can probably use to avoid the pitfalls of parsing command line output.(If you ever want support for other distros that don't mandate SystemD init, you will probably want to introduce a build configuration option to build without systemd support)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: